DOCSLIB.ORG

Egmont Group Annual Report 2018-2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Egmont Group Annual Report 2018-2019 Egmont Group of Financial 2018 Intelligence Units 2019 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL REPORT 2018 / 2019 1 Applications for permission to reproduce all or part of this publication should be made to: THE EGMONT GROUP SECRETARIAT Tel: +1 647-349-4116 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.egmontgroup.org Copyright @ 2018 by the Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units 2 EGMONT GROUP OF FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE UNITS EGMONT GROUP ANNUAL REPORT 2018 | 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 2018 / 2019 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Remarks by the Chair, Mrs. Hennie VERBEEK-KUSTERS ........................................................................................................... 6 Remarks by the Executive Secretary, Mr. Jérôme BEAUMONT .................................................................................................7 Chapter 1: Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units (EG) .................................................................................................. 8 Highlights 2018-2019 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Structure ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................10 Mandate .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................11 Membership .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................12 Distribution of FIUs by region...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................12 Chapter 2: Strategic Plan in Action ................................................................................................................................................14 Egmont Group Strategic Plan 2018-2021 ..........................................................................................................................................................................................15 Strategic Plan in Action 2018-2019 .....................................................................................................................................................................................................16 Chapter 3: Measuring Success – Egmont Biennial Census 2019 and Operational Outcomes ........................................18 EBC Results ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................19 Operations in Numbers ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................19 Operational Outcomes: Egmont Group Publications .....................................................................................................................................................................20 Chapter 4: Looking Ahead ..............................................................................................................................................................22 Chapter 5: Working Group Developments ..................................................................................................................................23 Information Exchange Working Group (IEWG) .................................................................................................................................................................................23 Membership, Support and Compliance Working Group (MSCWG) ............................................................................................................................................26 Policy and Procedures Working Group (PPWG) ..............................................................................................................................................................................26 Technical Assistance and Training Working Group (TATWG) .......................................................................................................................................................28 Chapter 6: Egmont Centre of FIU Excellence and Leadership (ECOFEL) ............................................................................29 Key deliverables and outcomes since establishment ....................................................................................................................................................................29 Overview of tools and support available to FIUs ............................................................................................................................................................................30 4 EGMONT GROUP OF FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE UNITS Chapter 7: Regional Group Developments ..................................................................................................................................31 Americas ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................32 Asia and Pacific ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................33 East and Southern Africa .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................34 Eurasia .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................35 Europe I ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................36 Europe II ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 37 Middle East and Northern Africa ........................................................................................................................................................................................................38 West and Central Africa ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................39 Chapter 8: Best Egmont Case Award ...........................................................................................................................................40 2019 BECA WINNER, UIF-PERU: ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................41 Finalist – FFMS/Rosfinmonitoring, Russia ........................................................................................................................................................................................43 Chapter 9 : Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................................... 47 Annexes ...............................................................................................................................................................................................48 Annex A: Jakarta Communiqué ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................48 Annex B: The Hague Co-Chairs Statement ......................................................................................................................................................................................49 Annex C: List of Members ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................50 Annex D: Egmont Committee Composition ......................................................................................................................................................................................51
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Future of Weapons of Mass Destruction an Update
    A NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE UNIVERSITY PRESIDENTIAL SCHOLAR’S PAPER THE FUTURE OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AN UPDATE By John P. Caves, Jr. NIU Presidential Scholar November 2019 – November 2020 and W. Seth Carus THE FUTURE OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AN UPDATE John P. Caves, Jr. and W. Seth Carus National Intelligence University National Intelligence Press Washington, DC February 2021 The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Intelligence University, National Defense University, or any other part of the U.S. government. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS While the authors are solely responsible for the final content of this paper, they benefited greatly from the time, expertise and support freely availed to them by many knowledgeable individuals and organizations. They include Mr. Caves’ colleagues at National Intelligence University (NIU), where he worked on this paper while on a detail assignment from National Defense University (NDU). Mr. Caves expresses par- ticular gratitude to Dr. Brian Holmes, dean of the Anthony G. Oettinger School of Science and Technol- ogy Intelligence, for his leadership, knowledge, and support. Dr. Sharon Adams, Ms. Beverly Barnhart, Mr. George Clifford, Dr. LaMesha Craft, and Dr. R. Carter Morris offered helpful comments on the paper at various stages. They and Mr. Damarius Alston, LTC Jeffrey Bacon, Lt Col Frances Deutch, Ms. Thelma Flamer, Mr. Julian Meade, and Ms. Christina Sanders were among others at NIU whose assistance and support made Mr. Caves’ assignment at NIU enjoyable as well as productive. Both authors are deeply indebted to their colleagues at NDU’s Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction (CSWMD), especially Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Russland–Analysen
    www.laender-analysen.de/russland Nr. 403 | 08.06.2021 Russland–Analysen • Duma-Wahlen • Repressionen ■ KOMMENTAR Schrumpfende Freiräume für Russlands Medien 25 Die Duma-Wahlen 2021: Hochmut kommt vor dem Fall – oder doch Esther Somfalvy (Forschungsstelle Osteuropa an der Universität nicht? 2 Bremen) Boris Ginzburg und Alexander Libman (Freie Universität Berlin) Russland drosselte Twitter, um Inhalte zu zensieren 27 Informationskriege, Oppositionskoordination und die Dumawahl Natalia Krapiva (Access Now) im Jahr 2021 4 ■ Regina Smyth (Indiana University und Woodrow Wilson Center, DEKODER »Hätten wir eine andere Wahl gehabt? Nein.« 30 Washington D.C.) Konstantin Gaase und Leonid Wolkow Wird das Putin-Regime überleben? 6 ■ DOKUMENTATION Andreas Heinemann-Grüder (Universität Bonn) Repressive Gesetze, die von Wladimir Putin am 30. Dezember 2020 Vorbereitung auf die Parlamentswahlen 2021 8 unterzeichnet wurden 35 Andrei Semenov (Zentrum für vergleichende Geschichts- und Politische Strafverfahren nach den Protesten im Januar 2021 37 Politikwissenschaft, Staatliche Universität Perm) April-Chronik der Repressionen: Der Journalist Ilja Asar hat Buch geführt 40 Vor den Dumawahlen weitet Russland die elektronische Überblick: Hochverrat, Spionage und Staatsgeheimnisse 47 Stimmabgabe aus – warum und mit welchen potenziellen Folgen? 10 »Haben Sie Angst vor…?« Umfrageergebnisse Stas Gorelik (George Washington-Universität, Washington D.C. / des Lewada-Zentrums 48 Forschungsstelle Osteuropa, Bremen) Teilnehmende an den Protesten aus Solidarität mit Alexej
    [Show full text]
  • Wikileaks and the Institutional Framework for National Security Disclosures
    THE YALE LAW JOURNAL PATRICIA L. BELLIA WikiLeaks and the Institutional Framework for National Security Disclosures ABSTRACT. WikiLeaks' successive disclosures of classified U.S. documents throughout 2010 and 2011 invite comparison to publishers' decisions forty years ago to release portions of the Pentagon Papers, the classified analytic history of U.S. policy in Vietnam. The analogy is a powerful weapon for WikiLeaks' defenders. The Supreme Court's decision in the Pentagon Papers case signaled that the task of weighing whether to publicly disclose leaked national security information would fall to publishers, not the executive or the courts, at least in the absence of an exceedingly grave threat of harm. The lessons of the PentagonPapers case for WikiLeaks, however, are more complicated than they may first appear. The Court's per curiam opinion masks areas of substantial disagreement as well as a number of shared assumptions among the Court's members. Specifically, the Pentagon Papers case reflects an institutional framework for downstream disclosure of leaked national security information, under which publishers within the reach of U.S. law would weigh the potential harms and benefits of disclosure against the backdrop of potential criminal penalties and recognized journalistic norms. The WikiLeaks disclosures show the instability of this framework by revealing new challenges for controlling the downstream disclosure of leaked information and the corresponding likelihood of "unintermediated" disclosure by an insider; the risks of non-media intermediaries attempting to curtail such disclosures, in response to government pressure or otherwise; and the pressing need to prevent and respond to leaks at the source. AUTHOR.
    [Show full text]
  • ASD-Covert-Foreign-Money.Pdf
    overt C Foreign Covert Money Financial loopholes exploited by AUGUST 2020 authoritarians to fund political interference in democracies AUTHORS: Josh Rudolph and Thomas Morley © 2020 The Alliance for Securing Democracy Please direct inquiries to The Alliance for Securing Democracy at The German Marshall Fund of the United States 1700 18th Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 T 1 202 683 2650 E [email protected] This publication can be downloaded for free at https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/covert-foreign-money/. The views expressed in GMF publications and commentary are the views of the authors alone. Cover and map design: Kenny Nguyen Formatting design: Rachael Worthington Alliance for Securing Democracy The Alliance for Securing Democracy (ASD), a bipartisan initiative housed at the German Marshall Fund of the United States, develops comprehensive strategies to deter, defend against, and raise the costs on authoritarian efforts to undermine and interfere in democratic institutions. ASD brings together experts on disinformation, malign finance, emerging technologies, elections integrity, economic coercion, and cybersecurity, as well as regional experts, to collaborate across traditional stovepipes and develop cross-cutting frame- works. Authors Josh Rudolph Fellow for Malign Finance Thomas Morley Research Assistant Contents Executive Summary �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 Introduction and Methodology ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Typologies of the Use of Preventive Measures of Financial Institutions for Crime Detection and Risk Assessment
    ЕВРАЗИЙСКАЯ ГРУППА по противодействию легализации преступных доходов и финансированию терроризма EURASIAN GROUP on combating money laundering and financing of terrorism EAG TYPOLOGY PROJECT TYPOLOGIES OF THE USE OF PREVENTIVE MEASURES OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS FOR CRIME DETECTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT TYPOLOGICAL STUDY REPORT 2021 Contents General ....................................................................................................................... 3 Preventive Measures and Suspicious Transaction Reporting in the EAG members 3 Approaches Used by FIUs for Analyzing Incoming STRs and Service Denial Reports ....................................................................................................................... 9 Feedback on STRs ................................................................................................... 16 Trends and risks in the spread of COVID-19 .......................................................... 21 Impact of COVID-19 on AML/CFT supervisory activities and implementation of preventive measures ................................................................................................ 24 Summary of recommendations following the results of the study: ......................... 26 General Application by entities engaged in transactions with funds or other assets of preventive measures as well as identification of suspicious transactions and submission of suspicious transaction reports (STRs) to the financial investigation units (FIUs) is one of the most important measures aimed
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligence Services Roles and Responsibilities in Good Security Sector Governance
    SSR BACKGROUNDER Intelligence Services Roles and responsibilities in good security sector governance About this series The SSR Backgrounders provide concise introductions to topics and concepts in good security sector governance (SSG) and security sector reform (SSR). The series summarizes current debates, explains key terms and exposes central tensions based on a broad range of international experiences. The SSR Backgrounders do not promote specific models, policies or proposals for good governance or reform but do provide further resources that will allow readers to extend their knowledge on each topic. The SSR Backgrounders are a resource for security governance and reform stakeholders seeking to understand but also to critically assess current approaches to good SSG and SSR. About this SSR Backgrounder This SSR Backgrounder explains the roles and responsibilities of intelligence services in good security sector governance (SSG). Intelligence services perform an essential security function by providing governments with timely and relevant information necessary to protect the security of states and their societies. Applying the principles of good SSG to intelligence services makes them both effective and accountable within a framework of democratic governance, the rule of law and respect for human rights. This SSR Backgrounder answers the following questions: What are intelligence services? Page 2 What do intelligence services do? Page 2 How is intelligence produced? Page 4 What intrusive legal powers do intelligence services hold?
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIA INTELLIGENCE Politics & Government
    N°66 - November 22 2007 Published every two weeks / International Edition CONTENTS KREMLIN P. 1-4 Politics & Government c KREMLIN The highly-orchestrated launching into orbit cThe highly-orchestrated launching into orbit of of the «national leader» the «national leader» Only a few days away from the legislative elections, the political climate in Russia grew particu- STORCHAK AFFAIR larly heavy with the announcement of the arrest of the assistant to the Finance minister Alexey Ku- c Kudrin in the line of fire of drin (read page 2). Sergey Storchak is accused of attempting to divert several dozen million dol- the Patrushev-Sechin clan lars in connection with the settlement of the Algerian debt to Russia. The clan wars in the close DUMA guard of Vladimir Putin which confront the Igor Sechin/Nikolay Patrushev duo against a compet- cUnited Russia, electoral ing «Petersburg» group based around Viktor Cherkesov, overflows the limits of the «power struc- home for Russia’s big ture» where it was contained up until now to affect the entire Russian political power complex. business WAR OF THE SERVICES The electoral campaign itself is unfolding without too much tension, involving men, parties, fac- cThe KGB old guard appeals for calm tions that support President Putin. They are no longer legislative elections but a sort of plebicite campaign, to which the Russian president lends himself without excessive good humour. The objec- PROFILE cValentina Matvienko, the tive is not even to know if the presidential party United Russia will be victorious, but if the final score “czarina” of Saint Petersburg passes the 60% threshhold.
    [Show full text]
  • DETAILED ASSESSMENT REPORT on ISRAEL ANTI-MONEY
    Strasbourg, 22 August 2008 MONEYVAL (2008) 01 EUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON CRIME PROBLEMS (CDPC) COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS ON THE EVALUATION OF ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING MEASURES AND THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM (MONEYVAL) DETAILED ASSESSMENT REPORT on ISRAEL 1 ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND COMBATING THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM Memorandum prepared by the Secretariat Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs (DG-HL) 1 Adopted by the MONEYVAL Committee at its 27 th Plenary Session (Strasbourg, 7-11 July 2008). All rights reserved. Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, save where otherwise stated. For any use for commercial purposes, no part of this publication may be translated, reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic (CD-Rom, Internet, etc) or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system without prior permission in writing from the MONEYVAL Secretariat, Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs, Council of Europe (F-67075 Strasbourg or [email protected]). 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PREFACE.................................................................................................................................................... 7 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................ 8 III. MUTUAL EVALUATION REPORT .................................................................................................... 15 1. GENERAL ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Treasury's Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence Could
    September 2009 COMBATING ILLICIT FINANCING Accountability Integrity Reliability Treasury’s Office of Terrorism and Financial Highlights Intelligence Could Manage More Effectively to Highlights of GAO-09-794, a report to the Achieve Its Mission Committee on Finance, United States Senate Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found In 2004, Congress combined TFI undertakes five functions, each implemented by a TFI component, in preexisting and newly created units order to achieve its mission, as shown in the following table. to form the Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence (TFI) within TFI Components and Functions the Department of the Treasury (Treasury). TFI’s mission is to Year integrate intelligence and Main function TFI component formed enforcement functions to (1) Build international coalitions Office of Terrorist Financing and 2004 safeguard the financial system Financial Crime Analyze financial intelligence Office of Intelligence and Analysis (OIA) 2004 against illicit use and (2) combat Administer and enforce the Bank Financial Crimes Enforcement Network 1990 rogue nations, terrorist facilitators, Secrecy Act (FinCEN) and other national security threats. Administer and enforce sanctions Office of Foreign Assets Control 1950 In the 5 years since TFI’s creation, Administer forfeited funds Treasury Executive Office for Asset 1992 questioned have been raised about Forfeiture how TFI is managed and allocates Source: Treasury. its resources. As a result, GAO was asked to analyze how TFI (1) TFI officials cite the analysis of financial intelligence as a critical part of TFI’s implements its functions, particularly in collaboration with efforts because it underlies TFI’s ability to utilize many of its tools.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Flows Linked to the Production and Trafficking of Afghan Opiates
    FATF REPORT Financial flows linked to the production and trafficking of Afghan opiates June 2014 FINANCIAL ACTION TASK FORCE The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is an independent inter-governmental body that develops and promotes policies to protect the global financial system against money laundering, terrorist financing and the financing of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. The FATF Recommendations are recognised as the global anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CFT) standard. For more information about the FATF, please visit the website: www.fatf-gafi.org © 2014 FATF/OECD. All rights reserved. No reproduction or translation of this publication may be made without prior written permission. Applications for such permission, for all or part of this publication, should be made to the FATF Secretariat, 2 rue André Pascal 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France (fax: +33 1 44 30 61 37 or e-mail: [email protected]). Photocredits coverphoto: United Nations Photo UNODC Zalmai FINANCIAL FLOWS LINKED TO THE PRODUCTION AND TRAFFICKING OF AFGHAN OPIATES CONTENTS ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................................... 2 KEY FINDINGS ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Observations ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Considerations
    [Show full text]
  • Canada, Mexico, and Central America
    CANADA, MEXICO AND CENTRAL AMERICA V-1 INCSR 2002 V-2 Canada, Mexico and Central America Belize I. Summary The Government of Belize (GOB) recognizes that the transit of drugs is a serious concern and works closely with the United States on narcotics control and international crime issues. In 1999 Belize was removed from the list of major drug-transit countries, but it remains a country of concern to the United States. In 2001 several large shipments of cocaine were seized in Belize territorial waters and mainland Belize. Belize is a party to the 1988 UN Drug Convention. II. Status of Country Belize has a population of approximately 250,000 and a landmass of 8,866 square miles with borders contiguous with Guatemala and Mexico. The topography consists of large tracts of unpopulated jungles and forested areas, a lengthy unprotected coastline, hundreds of small caves, and numerous navigable inland waterways. These factors, combined with Belize’s rudimentary infrastructure, make Belize a natural transshipment point for illicit drugs. On January 15, 2002, Belize formally ended its economic citizenship program. This program had raised serious concerns in the past, because it allowed some international criminals and fugitives from justice to receive Belize citizenship. III. Country Actions Against Drugs in 2001 Policy Initiatives. In November the Commissioner of Police proposed that the Anti-Drug Unit be increased from 12 members to 23 members. Since its inception in 2000, the United States has provided assistance to this vetted unit, and the U.S. Department of Justice and the DEA vetted the initial members of the unit.
    [Show full text]
  • MONEYVAL 2008 23 Russian Federation
    Strasbourg, 11 July 2008 MONEYVAL (2008) 23 EUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON CRIME PROBLEMS (CDPC) COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS ON THE EVALUATION OF ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING MEASURES AND THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM (MONEYVAL) DETAILED ASSESSMENT REPORT on the RUSSIAN FEDERATION ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND COMBATING THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM Adopted by the MONEYVAL Committee at its 27th Plenary Session Strasbourg, 7 - 11 July 2008 Memorandum prepared by the Secretariat Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs (DG-HL) All rights reserved. Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, save where otherwise stated. For any use for commercial purposes, no part of this publication may be translated, reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic (CD-Rom, Internet, etc) or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system without prior permission in writing from the MONEYVAL Secretariat, Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs, Council of Europe (F-67075 Strasbourg or [email protected]). TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE - INFORMATION AND METHODOLOGY USED FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.......................................................................................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................................7 1. GENERAL ......................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]