3. Landfill and Other Waste Sites Map
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Download Core Strategy Publication Report
Local Plan for Pendle Core Strategy Publication Report September 2012 For an alternative format of this document phone 01282 661330 Pendle Core Strategy Publication Report 1 Foreword Foreword Pendle is a unique and special place: attractive, diverse, yet constantly changing. We care about our community, so it is important that we recognise the challenges that the future holds, and that we plan for those changes. We live in an age where rapid advances in technology are changing how we communicate, the way we shop, where and how we work and the life choices we make. We are living longer too; and have higher expectations for a future where we expect to enjoy good health and greater prosperity. We must direct future growth to the right locations and carefully manage regeneration activity. We need to provide guidance so that new development benefits those people who live and work in our towns and villages, whilst continuing to protect and enhance those assets that make the area both attractive and locally distinctive. In doing so we must carefully consider the social, economic and environmental impacts of our actions. Only in this way can we hope to realise our vision of making Pendle a better place to live, work, learn, play and visit. The Core Strategy will work alongside Our Pendle, Our Future: Pendle’s Sustainable Community Strategy, to help us shape the future of Pendle, by addressing issues that are important to our locality as well as matters of wider concern such as climate change. The policies in the Core Strategy have been influenced by the evidence available to us. -
21 0661 EIA Vol 6 Appendix 7 1 Prelimina
Haweswater Aqueduct Resilience Programme - Proposed Marl Hill Section Volume 6 Proposed Ribble Crossing Appendix 7.1: Preliminary Water Environmental Regulations Compliance Assessment June 2021 Volume 6 P ro posed Rib ble C rossin g Appe ndix 7.1: Prelimin ary Wate r E nviro nment al R egul atio ns Comp liance Assessment United U tilities Wate r Limite d Volume 6 Proposed Ribble Crossing Appendix 7.1: Preliminary Water Environmental Regulations Compliance Assessment Haweswater Aqueduct Resilience Programme - Proposed Marl Hill Section Project No: B27070CT Document Title: Volume 6 Proposed Ribble Crossing Appendix 7.1: Preliminary Water Environmental Regulations Compliance Assessment Document Ref.: RVBC-MH-RC-TA-007-001 Revision: 0 Date: June 2021 Client Name: United Utilities Water Ltd Jacobs U.K. Limited 5 First Street Manchester M15 4GU United Kingdom T: +44 (0)161 235 6000 F: +44 (0)161 235 6001 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2021 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. i Volume 6 Proposed Ribble Crossing Appendix 7.1: Preliminary Water Environmental Regulations Compliance Assessment Contents 1. -
Samuel House, 1St Floor, 5 Fox Valley Way, Stocksbridge, Sheffield, S36 2AA Tel: 0114 321 5151 Our Ref: SHF.1615
Samuel House, 1st Floor, 5 Fox Valley Way, Stocksbridge, Sheffield, S36 2AA Tel: 0114 321 5151 www.enzygo.com Our Ref: SHF.1615.003.HY.L.001.A Date: 13th February 2020 Your Reference: 3/2020/0010 FAO: Carole Woosey Email: [email protected] Ribble Valley Borough Council Development Control Council Offices Church Walk Clitheroe Lancashire BB7 2RA Dear Carole, RE: HENTHORN ROAD, CLITHEROE, BB7 2QF [REFERENCE 3/2020/0010] - RESPONSE TO ENVIRONMENT AGENCY OBJECTION Enzygo Ltd have been commissioned to provide a response to an Environment Agency objection to a reserved matters planning application for 21 units on the above Site. A copy of the Environment Agency objection letter (Reference: NO/2020/112396/01-L01) is included as Attachment 1. This letter relates specifically to addressing Comments 1, 2 and 3 of the Environment Agency response. Please find below our response to the Environment Agency comments. ‘The proposed development would restrict essential maintenance and emergency access to Pendleton Brook, Main River. The permanent retention of a continuous unobstructed area is an essential requirement for future maintenance and/or improvement work’ To overcome our objection, the applicant should; 1) Submit cross sections extending from the water’s edge, including the top of the riverbank to the development areas closest to the watercourse, specifically plots 8 and 13 (Sabden), plot 7 (Eagley) and between the top of the riverbank and the attenuation pond. Drawing HR-BTP-00-S-DR-A-3537_160A (Attachment 2) includes cross sections at Plots 8, 7, 13 and the attenuation basin location as requested. The cross sections demonstrate that the built development will be a minimum of 13.2m (Plot 8) from the surveyed Pendleton Brook right bank top (A). -
Site 9 Primrose Mill, Clitheroe
Inter Hydro Technology Forest of Bowland AONB Hydro Feasibility Study Site 9: Primrose Mill, Clitheroe Site Assessment Report Title Figure 1 Map showing general layout Primrose Mill is a former water powered cotton spinning mill built in 1787. It later became a print works, paper works and lifting equipment manufacturer. The mill site has been extensively redeveloped and now provides a private residence, and a mix of technology and industrial business occupancy. The millpond lies to the North East on Mearley Brook and is not in the ownership of site however, the owners of the site have water abstraction rights. The weir and intake appear in good condition and the scope to produce energy at this site is good. The option shown above involves the construction of a new inlet and screen at the top of the weir and laying of a buried pipeline passing down the driveway to Primrose Lodge. The pipeline would need to pass under the currently unoccupied part of the mill building. A new powerhouse and new turbine would be constructed adjacent to the Pendleton Brook. A second option worthy of consideration would be to construct a turbine and power house on the weir. However, this may result in increasing flood risk upstream and a flood risk assessment would be required early in the feasibility stage to evaluate the risk. Authors Name Authors Title Date Forest of Bo wland AONB 1 2011 Inter Hydro Technology Forest of Bowland AONB Hydro Feasibility Study Figure 2 Intake weir from downstream Figure 3 Existing intake channel above weir Catchment Analysis Figure 4 Catchment boundary defined by Flood Estimation Handbook Software 2 Forest of Bowland AONB 2011 Inter Hydro Technology Forest of Bowland AONB Hydro Feasibility Study The Flood Estimation Handbook software is used to determine the following catchment descriptors for the proposed intake location, selected during the site visit. -
Summary of Fisheries Statistics 1984
Summary of fishery statistics, 1984 Item Type monograph Publisher North West Water Authority Download date 24/09/2021 19:31:15 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/24904 Summary of Fisheries Statistics 1984 ISSN 0144-9141 SUMMARY OF FISHERIES STATISTICS, 1984 CONTESTS 1. Catch Statistics 1.1 Rod and line catches (from licence returns) 1.1.1 Salmon 1.1.2 Migratory Trout 1.2 . Commercial catches 1.2.1 Salmon 1.2.2 Migratory Trout 2. Fish Culture and Hatchery Operations 2.1 Brood fish collection 2.2 Hatchery operations and salmon and sea trout stocking 2.2.1 Holmwrangle Hatchery 2.2.1.1 Numbers of ova laid down 2.2.1.2 Salmon and sea trout planting 2.2.2 Middleton Hatchery 2.2.2.1 Numbers of ova laid down 2.2.2.2 Salmon and sea trout planting 2.2.3 Langcliffe Hatchery 2.2.3.1 Numbers of ova laid down 2.2.3.2 Salmon and sea trout planting - 1 - Restocking with Trout and Freshwater Fish 3.1 Non-migratory trout 3.1.1 Stocking by Angling Associations etc. and Fish Farms 3.1.2. Stocking by N.W.W.A. 3.1.2.1 North Cumbria 3.1.2.2 South Cumbria/North Lancashire 3.1.2.3 South Lancashire 3.1.2.4 Mersey and Weaver 3.2 Freshwater Fish 3.2.1 Stocking by Angling Associations, etc 3.2.2 Fish transfers carried out by N.W.W.A. 3.2.2.1 Northern Area 3.2.2.2 Southern Area - South Lancashire 3.2.2.3 Southern Area - Mersey and Weaver 3.2.3 Fish Grants from N.W.W.A. -
What Is a Boggart Hole?1 Simon Young ISI, Florence (Italy)
What is a Boggart Hole?1 Simon Young ISI, Florence (Italy) INTRODUCTION The boggart—a word of uncertain origins (OED, ‘Boggard, -art’; Nodal and Milner 1875, 126; Wright 1898–1905, I, 326)—was once a much feared bogey in the midlands and the north of England. By the nineteenth century it had come to be associated, above all, with what might be called a ‘greater Lancashire’: the County Palatine, the south Pennines and the northern fringes of Cheshire and Derbyshire. Relative to the amount of writing that survives, most of it from the 1800s and much in Lancashire dialect, the boggart is perhaps Britain’s most understudied supernatural creature. This is true of the nineteenth century (Thornber 1837, 38, 99–104 and 329–34; Harland and Wilkinson 1867, 49–62; 1873, 10–12 and 141– 42; Hardwick 1872, 124–42; Bowker 1883, 27–36, 52–58, 63–72, 77–82, 131–39, 152–58, 174–88, 212–20 and 238–42; McKay 1888), and of recent years (Billingsley 2007, 69–74; Turner-Bishop 2010; Roberts 2013, 95–105; Young 2014b). Boggart place-names have particularly been neglected. In fact, there is, to the best of the present writer’s knowledge, no study of boggart toponyms, despite the existence of tens of boggart place-names, many still in use today.2 1 I would like to thank John Billingsley, David Boardman, Ffion Dash, Anna Garrett, Richard Green, Denise Jagger, Stephen Lees, Wendy Lord, Eileen Ormand and the anonymous reviewer for help with the writing and with the improvement of this article. -
Environment Agency North West Region Central Area
Central area redd project [Ribble, Hodder and Lune catchments] Item Type monograph Authors Lewis, J. Publisher Environment Agency North West Download date 02/10/2021 20:24:19 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/25128 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY NORTH WEST REGION CENTRAL AREA REDD PROJECT J LEWIS FEBRUARY 2000 G:\FER\Fisheries\Redd Counts\GIS Data Central Area Fisheries Science and Management Team Redd Distribution Project SUMMARY Redd counting is an integral part of most Fishery Officers duties. The number and distribution of salmonid redds throughout salmonid catchments provides invaluable information on the range and extent of spawning by both salmon and sea trout. A project was initiated by the Fisheries Science and Management Team of Central Area, NW Region in liason with the Flood Defence function. The main objective of this project was to assess redd count data for Central Area and attempt to quantify these data in order to produce a grading system that would highlight key salmonid spawning areas. By showing which were the main areas for salmon and sea trout spawning, better informed decisions could be made on whether or not in-stream Flood Defence works should be given the go-ahead. The main salmonid catchments in Central Area were broken into individual reaches, approximately 1 km in length. The number of redds in these individual reaches were then calculated and a density per lkm value was obtained for each reach. A grading system was devised which involved looking at the range of density per km values and dividing this by five to produce 5 classes, A - E. -
1994 Annual Fisheries Report
NBA FISHERIES J 8 JORTH WEST REGION 1994 ANNUAL FISHERIES REPORT NRA National Rivers Authority North West Region Guardions of the Water Environment m£a \ i r 1994 ANNUAL REPORT ON FISHERIES IN THE NORTH WEST INCORPORATING THE ANNUAL SUMMARY OF FISHERY STATISTICS INDEX OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2 2 NRA FISHERIES STAFF 3 REGIONAL FISHERIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS 5 CONSULTATIVE ASSOCIATION CONTACTS 5 3 NATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 6 4 REGIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 13 5 FISHERIES INCOME & EXPENDITURE 18 6 AREA ACTIVITY REPORTS 22 7 SALMON & SEA TROUT CATCHES 31 7.1 ROD & LINE (FROM LICENCE RETURNS) 1974-1994 31 7.2 COMMERCIAL CATCHES 1974-1994 41 7.3 ANGLER LOG BOOK RETURNS FOR 1994 46 8 MONITORING / SPECIAL PROJECTS 50 8.1 SALMON MICROTAGGING PROGRAMME 1987-1994 50 8.2 WEAVER MATCHES-USE OF ANGLER CATCH DATA 51 FOR STOCK ASSESSMENT 8.3 SALMON EGG SURVIVAL ASSESSMENT SWANSIDE BECK 54 8.4 FISH STOCK ASSESSMENT USING HYDROACOUSTICS 55 8.5 FISH STOCK ASSESSMENT SURVEY SUMMARIES 56 8.5.1 NORTH CUMBRIA 57 8.5.2 SOUTH CUMBRIA 58 8.5.3 CENTRAL 60 8.5.4 SOUTH 61 APPENDIX : SUMMARY OF FISHERIES STATISTICS 1994 63-114 y ENVIRONMENT AGENCY FISHERIES ANNUAL REPORT 1994 075911 1 FISHERIES ANNUAL REPORT 1994 INTRODUCTION This is the first time that the National Rivers Authority, (NRA), has produced an Annual Report on fisheries in the North West Region. It has four main aims ; • To inform the NRA's customers of developments within the NRA • To inform the NRA's customers of the work carried out by the NRA • To publish information on the performance of fisheries • To be a source for future reference We hope that you will find this report interesting and informative. -
Ribble Life Together Key Facts Ribble Life Together Is an Ambitious Project That Brings Together All Area Ribble Catchment with Specific Focus Areas
Ribble Life Together Key facts Ribble Life Together is an ambitious project that brings together all Area Ribble Catchment with specific focus areas. members of the Ribble’s Catchment Based Approach partnership. The project seeks to initially develop (from May 2015 to November 2016), and Outcomes Improved water quality: reduced diffuse then deliver (from April 2017 to November 2020) a range of activities that pollution sources including faecal matter to will significantly improve the Ribble Catchment for people and wildlife. improve coastal bathing waters. Improved biodiversity: increased riverine & It uses “ecosystem services” principles to identify where in the catchment other habitats, connectivity and re- improvements are required that can be delivered through natural process naturalisation. providing a service to both the public and the environment, such as Reduced flood risk: using natural processes woodland creation to reduce flood risk or improved water quality at aid in reducing flood risk. designated bathing waters. In addition to natural processes, the principle Recreation: improved access and can be used to identify where improving access will provide the most information for people to access rivers and benefit and opportunities for people to access and enjoy their riverine streams. environment. Education: increase awareness, engagement and understanding of riverine heritage. To identify where these services are needed, the partnership has shared a Social: provide training, volunteering and huge amount of data and evidence to allow a study to be completed to other opportunities for all to become highlight specific target locations and areas. This study has also included involved in improving and celebrating their what information is currently available about the condition of these places river heritage. -
Fisheries Monitoring of the Ribble Catchment
Fisheries Monitoring of the Ribble Catchment The Ribble Rivers Trust Paul Peters, Fisheries Scientist The Ribble Rivers Trust C/o Hanson Cement Ribblesdale Works Clitheroe Lancashire BB7 4QF Email: [email protected] Tel: 01200444452 Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Results ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Brown Trout ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Salmon ................................................................................................................................................. 9 Analysis .............................................................................................................................................. 14 Weather series ................................................................................................................................. -
The Paper Was Read : the ROMAN ROADS of LANCASHIRE. PART II
3 The Paper was read : THE ROMAN ROADS OF LANCASHIRE. PART II. ON THE SEVENTH ITEB OF RICHARD OF CIRENCESTER. By John Just, Esq. Lancashire is intersected in the direction of west and east by a Roman Military Road, just as it is north and south by that which was traced out for this Society in a former Paper.* This cross-road has but one authority extant for its course and destination. Richard of Cirencester gives us this in the 7th Iter of his Itinerary. He there states that a Roman Road reached from the " Portus Sistuntiorum" to York from the sea to the midland. The first object, then, in detecting this line of road is by ascer taining the site of the "Portus Sistuntiorum." Fortunately the situation of this harbour is mentioned by the geographer Ptolemy, who places it near to the great inlet of the bay of Morecambe. As two estuaries are not far distant from the entrance of this bay we have still a difficulty to contend with. But as a portion of a Roman Military Road has been known from time immemorial by the name of Watling Street, across Fulwood Moor, a little to the north of Preston, and as this lies in the direction of Richard's line, we must endeavour to trace it out in both directions, to ascertain the site of the " Portus Sistuntiorum," and thereby establish it as the identical line of road described by his document. By following up its remains west ward we are led close to Poulton-in-the-Fylde, and thereby find that on the estuary of the Wyre was situated the harbour of the Sistuntii. -
Advisory Visit River Ribble
Advisory Visit River Ribble – Lancashire 24/03/2015 1.0 Introduction This report is the output of a site visit to Bowland Game Fishing Association (BGFA) waters on the River Ribble, undertaken by Gareth Pedley of the Wild Trout Trust. The visit was requested following an initiative by BGFA to stop stocking on the River Ribble and to redirect funding and concentrate efforts on improving habitat for wild fish. Two sections of the river were visited at Long Preston and Paythorne. Normal convention is applied throughout this report with respect to bank identification, i.e. the banks are designated left bank (LB) or right bank (RB) whilst looking downstream (D/S). The Ordnance Survey National Grid Reference system is used for identifying locations. This report covers observations made at the two sections of River Ribble visited, and discusses options for future fish stock and riparian management. Table 1. Overview of the waterbody details for the sections of river visited Waterbody details Upper Section Waterbody details Lower Section River Ribble Ribble Waterbody Ribble (Stainforth to Long Preston Beck) Ribble (Long Preston to Stock Beck) Name Waterbody ID GB112071065614 GB112071065613 Management Middle Ribble - Settle to Calder Middle Ribble - Settle to Calder Catchment River Basin North West North West District Current Good (Not assessed for biological Good (Not assessed for biological Ecological quality elements – Not high for quality elements – Not high for Quality hydromorphological Supporting Elements) hydromorphological Supporting Elements) U/S Grid Ref SD 82368 57237 SD 84375 52274 D/S Grid Ref SD 82870 56812 SD 83317 51648 Length of river 0.65 1.52 inspected (km) (http://environment.data.gov.uk/catchment-planning/WaterBody/GB112069061340) 1 Under the Water Framework Directive (WFD) classification, most of the ecological and chemical parameters for both waterbodies have been scored as ‘good’ or ‘high’, giving an overall classification of ‘good’.