DOCSLIB.ORG

View of Life in the Sea Than Any Other Site for That Time Period (World Heritage Committee, 2019)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
View of Life in the Sea Than Any Other Site for That Time Period (World Heritage Committee, 2019) IUCN World Heritage Outlook: https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org/ Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks - 2020 Conservation Outlook Assessment Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks 2020 Conservation Outlook Assessment INFORMACIÓN DEL SITIO Country: Canada Inscribed in: 1984 Criteria: (vii) (viii) The contiguous national parks of Banff, Jasper, Kootenay and Yoho, as well as the Mount Robson, Mount Assiniboine and Hamber provincial parks, studded with mountain peaks, glaciers, lakes, waterfalls, canyons and limestone caves, form a striking mountain landscape. The Burgess Shale fossil site, well known for its fossil remains of soft-bodied marine animals, is also found there. © UNESCO RESUMEN 2020 Conservation Outlook Finalised on 02 Dic 2020 GOOD WITH SOME CONCERNS The values of the Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks World Heritage site, inscribed under criteria (vii) and (viii) have so far remained well preserved and the management of individual protected areas comprising this serial site has been relatively effective. However, there are a number of concerns and threats negatively affecting these values. Glaciers are receding dramatically and are predicted to shrink by 95% by 2100. This will have a significant impact on hydrological systems, particularly river flows. An important mammal sub- species, mountain caribou, has been lost from much of the site and is declining towards extirpation. Rapidly increasing tourism numbers and tourism infrastructure are impacting the scenic value of the main valleys, and external pressure from increasing development activities outside of the site is affecting it. Reduced budgets and staffing levels raise questions about the commitment and capacity to address these threats, especially in the provincial parks. Overall, the conservation outlook for the site is considered Good with some concerns, noting that those concerns are persistent from previous Outlook assessments and are growing in some cases. IUCN World Heritage Outlook: https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org/ Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks - 2020 Conservation Outlook Assessment FULL ASSESSMENT Description of values Valores World Heritage values ▶ Striking mountain landscape of exceptional natural beauty Criterion:(vii) The seven parks of the Canadian Rockies form a striking mountain landscape. With rugged mountain peaks, ice fields, and glaciers, alpine meadows, lakes, waterfalls, extensive karst cave systems, thermal springs and deeply incised canyons, the Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks possess exceptional natural beauty (World Heritage Committee, 2019). ▶ One of the most significant fossil areas Criterion:(viii) The Burgess Shale is one of the most significant fossil areas in the world. Exquisitely preserved fossils record a diverse, abundant marine community dominated by soft-bodied organisms. Originating soon after the rapid unfolding of animal life about 540 million years ago, the Burgess Shale fossils provide key evidence of the history and early evolution of most animal groups known today, and yield a more complete view of life in the sea than any other site for that time period (World Heritage Committee, 2019). ▶ A classic representation of on-going glacial processes Criterion:(viii) The seven parks of the Canadian Rockies comprise Banff National Park (BNP), Jasper National Park (JNP), Kootenay National Park (KNP), Yoho National Park (YNP), Mount Robson Provincial Park, Hamber Provincial Park, and Mount Assiniboine Provincial Park. These seven parks are a classic representation of significant and on-going glacial processes along the continental divide on highly faulted, folded and uplifted sedimentary rocks (World Heritage Committee, 2019). Other important biodiversity values ▶ Biodiversity - rich assemblage of North American mammals and other species The Rocky Mountain Parks encompass three life zones or ecoregions: montane, subalpine and alpine. Montane zones lie within major river valleys and support deciduous and coniferous forests, wetlands and meadow habitat, and the highest biodiversity of the three ecoregions. Forests extend through the subalpine zone, the most extensive ecoregion in the Rockies. Alpine zones are above treeline and support hardy, low-growing vegetation. A total of 56 mammals have been reported in these parks as well over 300 avian species, five amphibian and 2 snake species (IUCN, 1984; Rogers, 2011). This list includes several iconic or IUCN Red-listed species such as American pipit, golden eagle, wolf, wolverine, hoary marmot, Clark’s nutcracker, American pika, elk, cougar and caribou (reindeer). The mountain parks support a number of species that have lost historic range due to fragmentation effects of early settlement and post-settlement development in the adjacent boreal, foothill and prairie landscapes (Laliberte and Ripple, 2004). This is particularly true for large mammals (carnivores and elk), whose range contracted considerably after settlement of the adjacent prairie landscapes. The mountain parks currently support a number of species with federal protected status under the Species at Risk Act (2012), including the mountain caribou, Banff Springs snail, whitebark pine, little brown myotis, black swift, barn swallow, bank swallow, bull trout, Athabasca rainbow trout and west slope cutthroat trout. IUCN World Heritage Outlook: https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org/ Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks - 2020 Conservation Outlook Assessment Assessment information Threats Current Threats High Threat External pressure on the World Heritage site due to increasing developments and tourism numbers has been on the rise. Although the site is nearly 2.3 million hectares in size it is still vulnerable to these impacts with limitations to its resilience. Tourism numbers and pressure for additional or expanded tourism infrastructure is rising. Infrastructure developments undergo comprehensive impact assessments which include visual impact considerations, and with likely future demands, the cumulative impacts of multiple developments will become increasingly important. Other threats include those linked to climate change. Between 1919 and 2012, glacier cover in the study area decreased by 590±70 km2 (40±5 %). Seventeen of 523 glaciers disappeared and 124 glaciers fragmented into multiple ice masses. Predictions are that Glaciers in Canadian Rockies could shrink by 95% by 2100. The reactivation of the oil pipeline through Jasper National Park raises environmental concerns as well as contributing to climate change. The Burgess Fossil shales are well protected (camera, alarms, enforcement staff) and visitation to the sites is controlled and well managed. ▶ Invasive Non-Native/ Alien Species Very Low Threat (Invasive Alien Species) Inside site, extent of threat not known Outside site Invasive non-native species are found in all the component parts of the World Heritage site and affect some of the threatened species present in the site, but this does not affect the striking mountain scenery, fossil or glacial processes for which the site was given its World Heritage status. The threat rating therefore reflects the level of impact on these World Heritage specific values, while the threats themselves are of concern. Invasive montane and subalpine plant species are present in Jasper, Banff, Kootenay and Yoho National Parks. Rainbow trout and Brook trout are found in all parks except Jasper, where they are readily hydridizing with native Westslope Cutthroat Trout. Invasive species diversity has increased significantly in the last decade in all parks (Parks Canada, 2019c; Parks Canada, 2019d) and efforts are continuing to remove or manage the threat. ▶ Fire/ Fire Suppression Data Deficient (Fire suppression) Inside site, widespread(15-50%) Outside site All National Parks in the World Heritage site have a sophisticated fire management program detailed in management plans. However, prescribed burns throughout the site are complicated because of the need to keep visitors and facilities safe, and maintaining the functionality of national transportation corridors. Species at risk concerns and wildfire models should be integrated to plan for prescribed burns within the context of species at risk habitat needs (Hunt et al., 2018). Consistent funding is needed for both new fuel management and maintenance of existing fuel management to ensure wildfire risk and management programs are maintained. Funding and park priority should also focus on modelling wildfire with the habitat needs of species at risk to take an ecosystems approach to wildfire management. ▶ Roads/ Railroads High Threat (Linear infrastructures (powerlines, oil pipelines, highway and Inside site, scattered(5-15%) railway infrastructure)) Outside site Highways and railways through the World Heritage site have led to wildlife mortality, and railway is the highest cause of mortality for grizzly bears in Banff, Kootenay, and Yoho National Parks (Hunt et al., 2018), and a cause of high mortality for black bears in Jasper National Park. Parks Canada partnered with CP rail to examine solutions to railways mortality within the parks. Several strategies and mitigation tools to reduce mortality emerged from this work. Noting some additional recent research such as Cassidy et al. (2020) which identified train speed, proximity to water and track curvature as IUCN World Heritage Outlook: https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org/ Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks - 2020 Conservation Outlook Assessment causes for greater railway mortalities, such findings should also inform park management. On Highway 16
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mount Robson Provincial Park, Draft Background Report
    Mount Robson Provincial Park Including Mount Terry Fox & Rearguard Falls Provincial Parks DRAFT BACKGROUND REPORT September, 2006 Ministry of Environment Ministry of Environment BC Parks Omineca Region This page left blank intentionally Acknowledgements This Draft Background Report for Mount Robson Provincial Park was prepared to support the 2006/07 Management Plan review. The report was prepared by consultant Juri Peepre for Gail Ross, Regional Planner, BC Parks, Omineca Region. Additional revisions and edits were performed by consultant Leaf Thunderstorm and Keith J. Baric, A/Regional Planner, Omineca Region. The report incorporates material from several previous studies and plans including the Mount Robson Ecosystem Management Plan, Berg Lake Corridor Plan, Forest Health Strategy for Mount Robson Provincial Park, Rare and the Endangered Plant Assessment of Mount Robson Provincial Park with Management Interpretations, the Robson Valley Land and Resource Management Plan, and the BC Parks website. Park use statistics were provided by Stuart Walsh, Rick Rockwell and Robin Draper. Cover Photo: Berg Lake and the Berg Glacier (BC Parks). Mount Robson Provincial Park, Including Mount Terry Fox & Rearguard Falls Provincial Parks: DRAFT Background Report 2006 Table of Contents Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................1 Park Overview.................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain Birds: Birds and Birding in the Central and Northern Rockies
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Zea E-Books Zea E-Books 11-4-2011 Rocky Mountain Birds: Birds and Birding in the Central and Northern Rockies Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Poultry or Avian Science Commons Recommended Citation Johnsgard, Paul A., "Rocky Mountain Birds: Birds and Birding in the Central and Northern Rockies" (2011). Zea E-Books. 7. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook/7 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Zea E-Books at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Zea E-Books by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIRDS Rocky Mountain Birds Birds and Birding in the Central and Northern Rockies Paul A. Johnsgard School of Biological Sciences University of Nebraska–Lincoln Zea E-Books Lincoln, Nebraska 2011 Copyright © 2011 Paul A. Johnsgard. ISBN 978-1-60962-016-5 paperback ISBN 978-1-60962-017-2 e-book Set in Zapf Elliptical types. Design and composition by Paul Royster. Zea E-Books are published by the University of Nebraska–Lincoln Libraries. Electronic (pdf) edition available online at http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook/ Print edition can be ordered from http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/unllib Contents Preface and Acknowledgments vii List of Maps, Tables, and Figures x 1. Habitats, Ecology and Bird Geography in the Rocky Mountains Vegetational Zones and Bird Distributions in the Rocky Mountains 1 Climate, Landforms, and Vegetation 3 Typical Birds of Rocky Mountain Habitats 13 Recent Changes in Rocky Mountain Ecology and Avifauna 20 Where to Search for Specific Rocky Mountain Birds 26 Synopsis of Major Birding Locations in the Rocky Mountains Region U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward an Ecosystem Reserve Complex for the Canadian Rockies
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1996 Toward an ecosystem reserve complex for the Canadian Rockies Thomas M. Platt The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Platt, Thomas M., "Toward an ecosystem reserve complex for the Canadian Rockies" (1996). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 6601. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/6601 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY The University ofIVIONTANA Pennissioii is granted by the author to reproduce tliis material in its entirety, provided that tliis material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. ** Please check "Yes** or "No" and provide signature ** Yes, I grant permission No, I do not grant permission Author’s Signature ^ Date Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's explicit consent. TOWARD AN ECOSYSTEM RESERVE COMPLEX FOR THE CANADIAN ROCKIES by Thomas M. Platt B.S. The University of Oregon, 1986 presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science The University of Montana 1996 Approved by: 1 Chairperson Dean, Graduate School Date UMI Number: EP37402 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared For
    Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc. •••DRAFT••• Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat TMX - Anchor Loop Project November 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The TERA/Westland staff and subconsultants responsible for the TMX - Anchor Loop Project Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat Program gratefully acknowledge the assistance and cooperation of Parks Canada and BC Parks management. Specifically we want to thank the following field and administrative staff: Jasper National Park Environment Canada • Thea Mitchell • Dale Kirkland • Wes Bradford • Paul Gregoire • Geoff Skinner • Andrew Robinson • Ward Hughson • Deanne Newkirk • Mark Bradley • Kim Forster BC Ministry of Environment • Anne Forshner • Chris Ritchie • Brenda Shepherd • Ted Zimmerman • Jesse Whittington Alberta Sustainable Resource Development BC Parks • Gordon Stenhouse • Rick Rockwell • Margo Pybus • Wayne Van Velzen • Jeff Kneteman • Hugo Mulyk • Rhonda Thibeault • Donna Thornton The help and support of Simpcw First Nation field assistants Sidney Jules, Steve Jules and Colin Eustache is also acknowledged. The Simpcw field personnel enthusiastically participated in all phases of the wildlife program. We thank them for their hard work and interest in this program. Several environmental nongovernment organizations took an active role in the identification of wildlife Valued Ecosystem Components and other aspects of program planning. We appreciate their guidance and cooperation throughout the course of the wildlife program work. Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc. •••DRAFT••• Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat TMX - Anchor Loop Project November 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The TMX - Anchor Loop Project proposed by Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc. involves the construction of 158 km of 812 mm or 914 mm (32-inch or 36-inch) diameter oil pipeline loop from a location west of Hinton, Alberta, across Jasper National Park (JNP) to a location immediately west of Mount Robson Provincial Park (MRPP), near Rearguard, British Columbia (BC).
    [Show full text]
  • SMZ Foreword
    Foreword BC Spaces for Nature is a solutions-oriented, conservation organization created in 1990 to promote the protection of British Columbia’s rich diversity of wilderness and wildlife. BC Spaces works with individuals and organizations throughout the province to ensure that British Columbia’s wild spaces remain intact. Given this mandate, BC Spaces recognized the potential that Special Management Zones could make in safeguarding these values. Hence this Citizens’ Guide has been written to help the public ensure that the Special Management Zones will indeed achieve their potential. After over 125 years of forest development, British Columbia still contains extensive temperate forests. These wildlands contain an extraordinary range of plants and animals that are the envy of the world. Consequently, British Columbians have a global responsibility to steward the environmental values of our province. However, for many years British Columbia’s forests have been subjected to damaging logging practices and unsustainable overcutting. In the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, this led to increasing conflicts between the logging industry and conservationists. In places such as Carmanah Valley and Clayoquot Sound the tensions of these confrontations became intense. To help resolve these conflicts the B.C. government sponsored a series of land use planning processes to designate the landbase for the management of both economic and ecological values. The zones delineated through these public negotiation exercises included: Protected Areas, Integrated Management, Enhanced Resource Use and Special Management. In particular, the establishment of Special Management Zones to maintain and enhance values other than timber - such as environmental and social concerns - were critical to achieving success at the negotiation table.
    [Show full text]
  • Sopr Jasper National Park Final Sept 11 2008 Signed
    JASPER ATIONAL ARK OF ANADA N P C State of the Park Report August 2008 STATE OF THE PARK REPORT JASPER NATIONAL PARK OF CANADA August 2008 August 2008 State of the Park Report for Jasper National Park of Canada i Table of Contents Executive Summary..................................................................................................................................... iii 1.0 Introduction..............................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Achieving the Vision for Jasper National Park...............................................................................1 1.2 Park Setting ..........................................................................................................................................3 2.0 Assessment and Evaluation Methods...................................................................................................5 2.1 Resource Protection Indicators..........................................................................................................6 2.2 Connection to Place: Visitor Experience and Public Education Indicators.................................7 3.0 Assessment of the State of Resource Protection, Visitor Experience and Public Education.........7 3.1 Ecological Integrity .............................................................................................................................7 Indicator: Native Biodiversity.............................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CURRICULUM VITAE Wayne P. Mccrory, Registered Professional
    1 CURRICULUM VITAE Wayne P. McCrory, Registered Professional Biologist (R.P.Bio.) President, McCrory Wildlife Services Ltd. <personal information removed> August 3, 2012 (Last up-date) EDUCATION B.Sc. Honours Zoology, University of British Columbia, 1966. Course emphasis: Wildlife management. Honors thesis on sub-speciation of mountain goats (published), thesis advisor was Dr. Ian McTaggart-Cowan. PROFESSIONAL LICENCE Registered Professional Biologist (R.P.Bio.), British Columbia. Member #168 EXPERTISE Primarily a specialist in black bear and grizzly bear ecology, conservation, safety, bear risk assessments, bear-people conflict prevention plans, design and management of bear-viewing tourism programs, bear safety and bear aversion training, bear problem analysis and other aspects. However, a broad range of experience in wildlife research involving numerous birds and mammals including design of GIS habitat map projects, conservation area design, travel corridors/connectivity and environmental impacts/cumulative effects assessments. Teaches bear safety and bear safety courses. PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES Member, College of Applied Biology (Registered Professional Biologist (R.P.Bio.) Member and certified guide and trainer with the BC Commercial Bear Viewing Association (CBVA) Member of, and contributor to, the International Association for Bear Research and Management, also known as the International Bear Association (IBA). With members from some 50 countries, the organization supports the scientific management of bears through research and
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    McCRORY WILDLIFE SERVICES LTD. RESPONSE TO 2011 TERRESTRIAL-WILDLIFE COMPONENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) & ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS REGARDING THE PROPOSED NEW PROSPERITY GOLD-COPPER MINE PROJECT AT TEZTAN BINY (FISH LAKE) WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO THE GRIZZLY BEAR [With added comments on Northwestern Toad & Wild Horses] Report for Friends of Nemaiah Valley (FONV) for submission to the CEAA Panel CEAR reference number 782 August 14, 2013 version Wayne P. McCrory, RPBio McCrory Wildlife Services 2 PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS & DISCLAIMER INFORMATION Professional background & relevant qualifications This report was prepared by me, bear biologist Wayne McCrory, for Friends of Nemaiah Valley (FONV) for submission to the federal CEAA Panel reviewing the New Prosperity mine proposal in the BC Chilcotin. I am a registered professional bear biologist in the province of British Columbia. I have an Honours Zoology degree from the University of British Columbia (1966) and have more than 40 years professional experience. My wildlife and extensive bear work has been published in ten proceedings, peer-reviewed journals, and government publications. I have produced 80 professional reports, some peer-reviewed, many involving environmental impacts, and bear habitat and bear hazard assessments. I served for four years on the BC government’s Grizzly Bear Scientific Advisory Committee (GBSAC). Qualifications relevant to my review of the New Prosperity 2011 EIS include the following. I have had extensive experience in environmental impact assessment involving a diverse array of developments, including impacts of logging on grizzly bears, caribou surveys in the Yukon related to the Gas Arctic Pipeline, impacts of the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline road, impacts of the Syncrude Tar Sands development on waterfowl and other wildlife, and others.
    [Show full text]
  • LEGISLATING BRITISH COLUMBIA: a HISTORY of B.C. LAND LAW, 1858-1978 by Michael Begg LL.B., University of Victoria, 1994 B.A., Un
    LEGISLATING BRITISH COLUMBIA: A HISTORY OF B.C. LAND LAW, 1858-1978 by Michael Begg LL.B., University of Victoria, 1994 B.A., University of Victoria, 1991 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF LAWS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA October, 2007 © Michael Begg, 2007 Abstract Almost all of British Columbia, 95%, is public land, managed by the B.C. government. This "95/5 split" is unique in the industrialized world. Public land, in its use for forestry, oil and gas, mining, tourism, and agriculture, remains the foundation of the B.C. economy. It has also come to define how the people of British Columbia see themselves as a society. But when did land become so much a part of British Columbia's identity? How is it that so much of British Columbia remains public? What does the high proportion of public land tell us about the role of the government? Why does land continue to have such an important role in this modern society? And what role does law play in the relationship among society, the economy, land, and government? With these questions as its starting point, this thesis offers a history of British Columbia through the lens of legislation for the allocation of land. The period covered, 1858-1978, enables the study of the two major periods of transition in land law, and of the continuity between them. Those periods are the establishment of colonial land legislation, from 1858- 1871, and the upheaval of those laws, from 1965-1978, ending just before the era of provincial land-use planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamber Provincial Park Has Been Part • Cant of the Canadian Rocky Mountain World Heritage Site
    Park Information Please Be Careful The park was named to honor the late Eric W. Hamber, • Weather varies with the season. Almost half the summer Hamber lieutenant-governor of British Columbia from 1936 to sees rain and wind, hikers need to be prepared. Provincial Park 1941. Since 1991, Hamber Provincial Park has been part • cant of the Canadian Rocky Mountain World Heritage Site. during high winds. Bushwacking in lower elevations. Grizzly and black bear habitats are extensive throughout • This is Bear Country; take necessary precautions when the park. Vegetation around Fortress Lake is mostly hiking, camping and storaging food. Bear poles are Park Map and Information Guide thick spruce and balsam with a very heavy understory of available at the campsites. false azalea and rhododendron. • Stream fordings can be treacherous with seasonal daily uctuations, especially from mid-June to the Things To Do end of August. The Chaba River is a major crossing and should only be attempted by experienced hikers. A rustic campground is located at the east end of Fortress Lake and several traditional campsites able along the north shore of the lake. Enjoy Your Stay ers Park regulations protect the nature state of the park and excellent angling opportunities. An air-accessed ensure a quality experience for all visitors. shing camp is situated on the Chisel Creek Fan midway down the lake’s south shore. • Please pack out refuse and dispose appropriately. • A 22-kilometre trail, starting at Sunwapta Falls in • stoves are recommended for cooking. Jasper National Park, leads hikers to Fortress • Horses are not permitted in the park.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Society and Protected Areas (Post-Conference Final) Harvey Locke
    Parks for Tomorrow 2008 July 7, 2008 Civil Society and Protected Areas (post-conference final) Harvey Locke “How can a Minister stand up against the pressures of commercial interests who want to use the parks for mining, forestry, for every kind of honky-tonk recreational device known to man, unless the people who love these parks are prepared to band together and support the minister by getting the facts out across the country?” Honourable Alvin Hamilton, 1960 Hansard Introduction Protected areas, especially national parks, are a highly valued component of Canadian life. They are of critical importance to the survival of many species of wildlife and to the provision of ecosystem services, including fresh-water production and carbon sequestration. Civil society is the owner of those protected areas. Contrary to recent conventional academic wisdom, the origin and development of Canada’s parks and protected areas lies not in business interests or the doctrine of commercial usefulness but rather in the interests of civil society. Indeed it is the special innovation of protected areas in North America (and Australia, New Zealand and South Africa) starting in the 19th century that they are dedicated to the public. Civil society’s engagement or lack of it has been and will likely continue to the determining factor in the success of protected areas in Canada. History has shown that when civil society practices absentee ownership, the result is the destruction or disappearance of protected areas and that when civil society leaves new protected area establishment exclusively to government, little gets done. However, the periods of public engagement in Canada’s protected areas have led to the creation of some of the world’s most emblematic national parks and several world-class protected areas systems.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Range of Impacts and Benefits of the Columbia River Treaty on Basin Communities, the Region and the Province
    A Review of the Range of Impacts and Benefits of the Columbia River Treaty on Basin Communities, the Region and the Province Prepared for: Ministry of Energy, Mines and Natural Gas Columbia River Treaty Review By George E. Penfold, M.Sc., RPP Community Planning and Development Consulting December 5, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... vi A. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT .............................................................................................. 1 B. SCOPE ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 C. THE COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY (TREATY) ........................................................................................................ 4 D. COLUMBIA RIVER AND TREATY DAM AND RESERVOIR DEVELOPMENT ................................................................. 7 Figure 1: Columbia River Treaty Dams and Reservoirs ......................................................................... 7 1. Mica Dam and Reservoir ............................................................................................................... 9 a) Description ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]