AVAILABLE from DOCUMENT RESUME Hearing on USERRA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AVAILABLE from DOCUMENT RESUME Hearing on USERRA DOCUMENT RESUME ED 404 468 CE 073 404 TITLE Hearing on USERRA, Veterans' Preference in the VA Education Services Draft Discussion Bill. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Education, Training, Employment and Housing of the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, Second Session. INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C. House Committee on Veterans' Affairs. REPORT NO ISBN-0-16-053858-0 PUB DATE 30 May 96 NOTE 187p.; Serial No. 104-23. Contains small type. AVAILABLE FROMU.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402. PUB TYPE Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials (090) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC08 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adults; *Compliance (Legal); Employer Attitudes; *Employment Problems; Employment Qualifications; Federal Government; Federal Legislation; Government Employees; Hearings; *Personnel Selection; *Public Agencies; *Reduction in Force; State Government; *Veterans IDENTIFIERS Congress 104th ABSTRACT This document records oral and written testimony given at a hearing before a subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Veterans' Affairs. The testimony pertains to veterans' preferences in hiring in the federal government and problems veterans are having in being reemployed after stints of active duty or during reductions in force (RIFs) at federal agencies. Those testifying included members of the House of Representatives, representatives of veterans' organizations, and officials of the Clinton Administration. According to the House members and the representatives of veterans' organizations, veterans have been faring badly in applications for employment and in protection against RIFs because bureaucrats do not support veterans and do not follow the law. The legislators have proposed bills that would provide for redress for veterans hurt by bureaucrats' failure to follow the law of preference in hiring. Administration officials, however, pointed out statistics that show that hiring of veterans has increased greatly during the past several years and that veterans have fared much better than nonveterans during RIFs. (KC) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** HEARING ON USERRA, VETERANS' PREFERENCE IN THE VA EDUCATION SERVICES DRAFT DIS- CUSSION BILL HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION, TRAINING, EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING OF THE COMMITTEE ON VETERANS' AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES cD, ONE HUNDRED FOURTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION MAY 30, 1996 Printed for the use of the Committee on Veterans' Affairs Serial No. 104-23 U.S. DEPARTMENT OFEDUCATION Office or Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) is document has been 9 received from the personreproduced as originating it. or organization O Minor changes have been reproduction Quality made to improve Points of new or opinionsstated in this docu- ment do not necessarilyrepresent official OERI position or policy U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 26-280 CC WASHINGTON : 1996 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington,DC 20402 ISBN 0-16-053858-0 BEST COPY AVATIABLE 2 COMMITTEE ON VETERANS' AFFAIRS BOB STUMP,Arizona, Chairman CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey G.V. (SONNY) MONTGOMERY, Mississippi MICHAELBILIRAKIS,Florida LANE EVANS, Illinois FLOYD SPENCE, South Carolina JOSEPH P. KENNEDY II, Massachusetts TIM HUTCHINSON, Arizona CHET EDWARDS, Texas TERRY EVERETT, Alabama MAXINE WATERS, California STEVE BUYER, Indiana BOB CLEMENT, Tennessee JACK QUINN, New York BOB FILNER, California SPENCER BACHUS, Alabama FRANK TEJEDA, Texas CLIFF STEARNS, Florida LUIS V. GUTIERREZ, Illinois BOB NEY, Ohio SCOTTY BAESLER, Kentucky JON FOX, Pennsylvania SANFORD BISHOP, Georgia MIKE FLANAGAN, Illinois JAMES E. CLYBURN, South Carolina BOB BARR, Georgia CORRINE BROWN, Florida JERRY WELLER, Illinois MIKE DOYLE, Pennsylvania J.D. HAYWORTH, Arkansas FRANK MASCARA, Pennsylvania WES COOLEY, Oregon DAN SCHAEFER, Colorado CARL D. COMMENATOR, Chief Counsel and Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION, TRAINING, EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING STEVE BUYER, Indiana, Chairman BOB BARR, Georgia BOB FILNER, California WES COOLEY, Oregon MAXINE WATERS, California TIM HUTCHINSON, Arizona JAMES E. CLYBURN, South Carolina DAN SCHAEFER, Colorado FRANK MASCARA, Pennsylvania CONTENTS Page OPENING STATEMENTS Chairman Buyer 1 Hon. Bob Filner 2 Hon. Wes Cooley 3 Prepared statement of Congressman Cooley 76 Hon. Frank Mascara 13 WITNESSES Crandell, Bill, Deputy Director, Government Relations, Vietnam Veterans of America 27 Prepared statement of Mr. Crandell 137 Dollarhide, Ms. Celia, Director of Education Services, Department of Veterans Affairs 44 Prepared statement of Ms. Dollarhide 158 Drach, Ronald, National Employment Director, Disabled American Veterans 22 Prepared statement of Mr. Drach, with attachment, 91 Kahn, Gerald, Veterans Economic Action Coalition 26 Prepared statement of Mr. Kahn 117 King, Hon. James B., Director, Office of Personnel Management accompanied by Mr. Leonard Klein, Associate Director for Employment Service 39 Prepared statement of Mr. King 153 Mica, Hon. John L., a Representative in Congress from the State of Florida 4 Prepared statement of Chairman Mica 77 Naschinski, Emil, National Economic Commission, The American Legion 24 Prepared statement of Mr. Naschinski, with attachments, 101 Siegel, Jonathan R., Associate Professor of Law, George Washington Univer- sity Law School 14 Prepared statement of Mr. Siegel 82 Taylor, Jr., Hon. Preston M., Assistant Secretary of Labor, Veterans Employ- ment and Training 38 Prepared statement of Mr. Taylor 144 MATERIAL SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD Discussion draft: H.R. a bill to amend 38, United States Code, to improve veterans education benefits, and for other purposes 71 Report: FY 1995 Report to Congress on the Employment and Reemployment Rights of members of the uniformed services, prepared by U.S. Depart- ment of Labor 63 Statements: Hon. Bob Stump, chairman, House Committee on Veterans' Affairs 61 Veterans of Foreign Wars 161 Non Commissioned Officers Association 164 Summary of Veterans Education Benefits Discussion Draft 69 Tables: Status of demonstration projectsactive and potential, requested by cer- tain agencies for approval, submitted by Office of Personnel Manage- ment 181 Written committee questions and their responses: Chairman Buyer to Office of Personnel Management 171 4 HEARING ON USERRA, VETERANS' PREF- ERENCE IN THE VA EDUCATION SERVICES DRAFT DISCUSSION ILL THURSDAY, MAY 30, 1996 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SUBCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION, TRAINING, EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING, COMMITTEE ON VETERANS' AFFAIRS, Washington, DC. The subcommittee met, pursuant to call, at 10 a.m. in room 334, Cannon House Office Building, Hon. Steve Buyer, (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding. Present:RepresentativesBuyer,Barr,Cooley,Hutchinson, Schaefer, Filner, Clyburn and Mascara. OPENING STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN BUYER. Mr. BUYER. Today, we've asked interested parties to present their views on how we're doing in the areas of veterans' preference and in the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, commonly called USERRA. We also have a draft bill that would make other changes in how VA administers its edu- cation programs. I recently had the privilege of testifying on veterans' preference before the Subcommittee on Civil Service. In that testimony, I began by saying this is a bipartisan issue and I believe we should continue in that fashion. Federal agencies have long abused, I be- lieve, veterans' preference in hiring, promotion and retention. Today, we'll see a piece of a videotape that shows they also violate the rights of veterans under USERRA. In my testimony, I made the point that I view the entrenched bureaucracy as the main source of the problem. There are thousands of managers and per- sonnel that would like nothing better than to see veterans, in fact, go away. They resent their presence in the organization for a num- ber of reasons. Maybe it's because these managers didn'tserve and are embarrassed by the presence of those who did. Maybe it's be- cause there are questions of women and minorities more repre- sentive as a growing proportion of the veterans. And maybe it's be- cause they have other diversity goals which they believe take prec- edence over veterans. Maybe they resent the unusually small dis- ruptions that are caused by periods of active duty. For whatever reason, I believe it can not continue. Our career civil servants must be made to follow the law, and their political bosses should be edu- (1) 5 2 cated to watch closely for these unacceptable personnel practices. I believe there are no other choices. Therefore, the issue that comes before us today is how do we structure a redress mechanism that will allow veterans to effec- tively pursue their claims of violations of veterans' preference stat- utes? Because most of that legislation lies within the jurisdiction of title 5 and the Subcommittee on Civil Service, I have asked the Chairman, John Mica, to appear today to give us their ideas on how this may best be approached. Before he begins, I would like to recognize the Ranking Member for any remarks he may have here today. OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. BOB FILNER Mr. FILNER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Certainly
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 5 Preparation, Consultation, and Coordination
    Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement Chapter 5 Preparation, Consultation, and Coordination Contents Project Management Team....................................................................................................................... 2 EIS Team Members .................................................................................................................................... 3 Administrative Support ............................................................................................................................ 6 Document Production............................................................................................................................... 6 Communications Team ............................................................................................................................. 6 GIS/Spatial Analysis Team ......................................................................................................................... 7 Science Advisory Group ............................................................................................................................ 7 Other Contributors ................................................................................................................................... 9 Agencies and Organizations Contacted ................................................................................................ 14 Chapter 5: Consultation and Coordination List of Preparers This
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may t>e from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI* Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 University of Oklahoma Graduate College The Tenuous Majority: The Effect of Two-Party Competition on the House of Representatives A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By JOHN P.
    [Show full text]
  • MICROCOMP Output File
    FINAL EDITION OFFICIAL LIST OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES of the UNITED STATES AND THEIR PLACES OF RESIDENCE ONE HUNDRED FOURTH CONGRESS . OCTOBER 4, 1996 Compiled by ROBIN H. CARLE, Clerk of the House of Representatives http://clerk.house.gov Republicans in roman (236); Democrats in italic (196); Independent in SMALL CAPS (1); vacancies (2) 2d AR, 2d TX; total 435. The number preceding the name is the Member’s district. ALABAMA 1 Sonny Callahan ........................................... Mobile 2 Terry Everett ............................................... Enterprise 3 Glen Browder .............................................. Jacksonville 4 Tom Bevill ................................................... Jasper 5 Robert E. (Bud) Cramer, Jr. ........................ Huntsville 6 Spencer Bachus ........................................... Vestavia Hills 7 Earl F. Hilliard ........................................... Birmingham ALASKA AT LARGE Don Young ................................................... Fort Yukon ARIZONA 1 Matt Salmon ................................................ Mesa 2 Ed Pastor ..................................................... Phoenix 3 Bob Stump ................................................... Tolleson 4 John B. Shadegg .......................................... Phoenix 5 Jim Kolbe ..................................................... Tucson 6 J. D. Hayworth ............................................ Scottsdale ARKANSAS 1 Blanche Lambert Lincoln ........................... Helena 2 ——— ——— 1
    [Show full text]
  • Regulating Jet Boat Use on the Wild and Scenic Snake River in Hells
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1996 Regulating jet boat use on the wild and scenic Snake River in Hells Canyon: An examination of the public participation process and an environmental organization's strategy within that process Marnie L. Criley The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Criley, Marnie L., "Regulating jet boat use on the wild and scenic Snake River in Hells Canyon: An examination of the public participation process and an environmental organization's strategy within that process" (1996). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 8575. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/8575 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY The University ofIVIONXANA Pennission is granted by tire author to reproduce tliis material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. ** Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature Yes, I grant pennission No, I do not grant permission____ Author’s Signature Date 11 * f Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author’s explicit consent.
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred Fourth Congress January 3, 1995 to January 3, 1997
    ONE HUNDRED FOURTH CONGRESS JANUARY 3, 1995 TO JANUARY 3, 1997 FIRST SESSION—January 4, 1995, 1 to January 3, 1996 SECOND SESSION—January 3, 1996, to October 4, 1996 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—ALBERT A. GORE, JR., of Tennessee PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—J. STROM THURMOND, 2 of South Carolina SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—SHEILA P. BURKE, 3 of California; KELLY D. JOHNSTON, 4 of Oklahoma; GARY L. SISCO, 5 of Tennessee SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE SENATE—HOWARD O. GREENE, JR., 6 of Delaware; GREGORY S. CASEY, 7 of Idaho SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—NEWT GINGRICH, 8 of Georgia CLERK OF THE HOUSE—ROBIN H. CARLE, 8 of Idaho SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—WILSON (BILL) LIVINGOOD, 8 of Pennsylvania CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 9—SCOTT M. FAULKNER, 10 of West Virginia; JEFF TRANDAHL, 11 of South Dakota ALABAMA Jon L. Kyl, Phoenix Wally Herger, Marysville SENATORS REPRESENTATIVES Vic Fazio, West Sacramento Matt Salmon, Mesa John T. Doolittle, Rocklin Howell T. Heflin, Tescumbia Robert T. Matsui, Sacramento Richard C. Shelby, Tuscaloosa Ed Pastor, Phoenix Bob Stump, Tolleson Lynn Woolsey, Petaluma REPRESENTATIVES John Shadegg, Phoenix George Miller, Martinez Sonny Callahan, Mobile Jim Kolbe, Tucson Nancy Pelosi, San Francisco Terry Everett, Enterprise J. D. Hayworth, Scottsfield Ronald V. Dellums, Oakland Glen Browder, Jacksonville Bill Baker, Danville Tom Bevill, Jasper ARKANSAS Richard W. Pombo, Tracy Bud Cramer, Huntsville SENATORS Tom Lantos, San Mateo Spencer Bachus, Birmingham Dale Bumpers, Charleston Fortney Pete Stark, Hayward Earl F. Hilliard, Birmingham David H. Pryor, Little Rock Anna G. Eshoo, Atherton REPRESENTATIVES Norman Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Sep- 2-91 Fri 10:20 Oregon Republican Party Fax No
    This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas SEP- 2-91 FR I 10:20 OREGON REPUBL Ihttp://dolearchives.ku.eduCAN PARTY FAX NO. 503620579 1 P. 01 TO~ senator Dole FR: Kerry Re: Oregon Background PARTY BACKGROUND: The state party is currently controlled by the more 11 mainstream11 wing. Party control has gone back and forth over the past years between the mainstream and the ultra right wing. The "Oregon Citizens Alliance" is the conservative organization that has gaini?.d powi:?.r at. t.hP. 1oc.o31 1AvP-l~- Whi1e OCA e.ndorse.mr?.t'lt. is often key to success in winning the primary, it can also be the kiss of death in the general election , The State Rouse of Representatives is currently controlled Qy the Republicans 32-28. The Senate is controlled by the Democrats 16-14, It is commonly believed th;;it the Republicans will gain control of the Senate in November, (for the first time in 40 years) and will keep control of the House. The Republican leader of the State Senate is Gordon Smith. He is a 42 year old millionaire CEO of one of America's largest frozen food companies. smith is a likely senate candidate if Hatfield does not run. He will be the emcee at the Denny Smith event in Portlanct. GOVERNOR'S RACE: The Democrat nominee is John Kitzhaber, former President of the Ore~on State Senate, and author of the Oregon health plan. There will also be two independent candidates on the ballot. Conventional wisdom is that Denny is probably about 10-15 points behind right now.
    [Show full text]
  • Eight Leaders to Watch in '96 Page 10
    - - ...._ __.,. - - - - - ~ ALA'.-S;KA: THE BIGGEST STATE M.ONEY CAN BUY ' J $2.95 us $3.50 Canada December 1995 Volume 1 No 9 I _J~4'Jr l ' .J .J ~---cJt I F v =cr, f! r :r _,,Jr ,~ · Eight Leaders To Watch in '96 page 10 ------~ ConR~------------------;· . ,. \\· .. --- DECEMBER 1995 · ,. • .< .. _, ' ;\. • ~:. ,; \ •• ' . : Dear Reader s 1995, Cascadia Times' debut year, winds to a close, we A believe people concerned about the environment have more to be hopeful about than at this time lase year. We are no longer looking at a nation caught up in an extremist frenzy co gut environmental laws. , Rather, we are seeing long overdue emergence of a strengthened move• ment (we profile some of its leaders starting on page 10). We look forward to the coming year, and believe CT is part of that response. The year has also seen the long overdue resignation of Bob Packwood from the U.S. Senate. And given the disenchantment toward extreme fac• tions within the Republican Party, Cascadia¥s Democrats are tripping over them• selves co get on the Oregon ballot. Certainly Reps. Ron Wyden and Peter Defazio didn't waste any time Shining Lights~- , entering the Dec. 5 primary (the seat will ·Yt: ··~,-~ be filled Jan. 30; both ballots are by mail.) Defazio is favored by many fiqht EnuironmentalLeaders to Watch in ·gfi c Oregon voters who admire his stands . A on energy conservation and salmon recovery, as well as against NAFTA. by Kathie Durbin and Paul Kobersto1 He is a maverick in the mold of Wayne Morse.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration Politics, Water Policy, and Dam Removal A
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ Same River Twice: Restoration Politics, Water Policy, and Dam Removal A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Environmental Studies by Peter Kimball Brewitt June 2014 The Dissertation of Peter Kimball Brewitt is approved: ______________________________ Professor Daniel M. Press, Chair ______________________________ Professor Karen D. Holl ______________________________ Professor Zdravka P. Tzankova ____________________________________ Tyrus Miller Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Peter Kimball Brewitt 2014 Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................... vi Abstract ............................................................................................................................. vii Dedication ............................................................................................................................ x Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................... xi Chapter 1: Dam Removal on the American West Coast ........................................ 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Background ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wallowa River Segment Proposed for Designation
    Acknowledgments . The U.S. Forest Service Umatilla and Wallowa-Whitman National Forests and the Bureau of Land Management Vale District acted as cooperating agencies in the writing of this report; their assistance was critical in its development. Much of this document was taken directly from, based on, or summarized from, the U.S. Forest Service’s earlier study of the Wallowa River, the Wallowa River Wild and Scenic River Study Report and Final Legislative Environmental Impact Statement. Both the Bureau of Land Management and the National Park Service were cooperating agencies on that study. By necessity, and to make this report complete for the Secretary of the Interior, Bruce Babbitt, much of this document is virtually identical to the U.S. Forest Service report. While this is a separate action, and the report must be complete enough for Secretary Babbitt to render a decision, there was no need to duplicate the earlier work of the U.S. Forest Service, thereby incurring greater cost to the Department of the Interior and the citizens of the United States. i ii Executive Summary This document is in response to a request by the state of Oregon to designate a segment of the Wallowa River into the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System as a state-managed river. Under section 2(a)(ii) of the national Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, the Secretary of the Interior is granted the authority to designate a river at the request of a state, provided certain conditions are met. The National Park Service has found, as explained in this report, that the state and the river meet these conditions and is recommending to the Secretary of the Interior that the Wallowa River be designated into the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System with a classification of recreational.
    [Show full text]
  • December 1996 Full Issue
    Cortffljjffl--------------------------- DECEMBER 1996 VOL. 2 No. 7 Dear Reader wo polls by Washington and Oregon conservation group last T summer told us what we already knew about public opinion and the envi• ronment. People want clean air and clean water. They want old-growth forests and almon. Yet in November, voters in this region defeated most initiatives aimed at EDITORIAL protecting the environment and elected a preponderance of candidates who are less than green. This disconnect is not easily explained. But it's also important not to End of An Era Page9 Re-Wiring the read too much into the results of Election '96. Many decisions that will By Kathie Durbin Northwest Page 8 shape our region's future are being made outside the polling booth. By Paul Koberstein As we report this i sue of Ca cadia Times, a decision by timber giant Louisiana-Pacific to close its polluting pulp mill in Ketchikan, Ala ka, earl THE USUAL STUFF next year has closed the door on one era and ushered in a new one in Southeast FIELD NOTES: Republicans control Cascadia. POINTS OF VIEW: How the battle for ancient Alaska. And a process et in motion by Bomb-building at Hanford: Clinton and the ESA: forests was lost. by Michael Donnelly 16 the governors of Washington, Oregon, Botulism at Klamath Refuge 3 Idaho and Montana is preparing a new Collusion? Corrupting? Scapegoating? by energy plan that will effect every con• GROUND TRUTHING: Election '96 - Money Robert Brothers (Bobcat) 17 sumer in the Pacific Northwest. It-is part of our mission at Cascadia Talks.
    [Show full text]
  • Zsgoddmaster
    UNITED STATES CONGRESS Bentz takes over Oregon’s 2nd District By Jeff Duewel of the Daily Courier There is still one Republican among Oregon’s five representa- tives in the U.S. House, but for the first time in over 20 years, it isn’t Greg Walden. Cliff Bentz of Ontario, veteran of the Oregon Legislature, now represents Oregon’s vast 2nd Congressional District after Walden’s retirement. He defeated several bigger names in the 2020 primary, including former gubernatorial candidates Knute Buehler of Bend and Jason Atkinson of Jacksonville, as well as a well- financed campaign by newcomer Jimmy Crumpacker. In the November election, he won in a landslide to keep the district red. The 2nd Congressional District, which includes the Grants Pass portion of Josephine County, Jackson County and all of Central and Eastern Oregon, has more than 70,000 square miles, the seventh-largest Congressional district in the country. It hasn’t had a Democrat elected since the legendary Al Ull- man of Baker City in 1981. Ullman served 12 terms, one more than Walden, before he was defeated in the Reagan landslide of 1980. CLIFF BENTZ Bentz, 69, has the same pedigree as Walden and the late Bob Smith, Republicans who have ruled the vast 2nd Congressional Wyden, Oregon’s senior senator at age 71, has been elected District since 1983, save for Wes Cooley’s single term in the to three six-year terms since he won a special 1990s (and he was a Republican, too). Bentz is a rancher, election over Gordon Smith in 1996 after Bob lawyer, and lawmaker who has served in the state Legislature Packwood resigned in a sex scandal.
    [Show full text]
  • A Salute to Republican Women Leadership FEATURING
    The Ripon Society presents its video sale of A Salute to Republican Women Leadership FEATURING: Sen. Milj .Le.lder Representatiye Represent.J.live SelUlor Rcpre~n l .. tive Representil tive Spcilker Bob Dole Jan 1\oiey1.'J"S 6.lrbara Vucanovich Nancy Kassebaum SUS/l n Molini'ln Nancy Johnson Newt Gi ngrich The Ripon Society's Salllte to Repllblican Womell Leadership video is a 20-minute program honoring the strides made by women in the Republican Party. This video makes it clear, that for all the rhetoric of the Democrat Party, it is the Republicans who actuall y have promoted and elected Congressional women to leadership positions throughout history. _.................. _._ .............. _.. _.. _..... __ .. _------------------------.---_._ .. -------------.------ -----_ ...__ ..... _---, YES! Send me a copy of the Ripon Society's ..1 Sa/ute to Republican Women Leadership Video for only $ 15. j ; Name: ,: Address: !: ! i City: State: _ _ Zip: ! i You may FAX your order to (202) 547-6560. Or mail it 10 Tir e Ripon Society, ! 501 Capitol Court NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002. ! .__ ... _...... __ ._. __ . ____ ... ____ ..• __ ...... ______________ ... _________ •__ .......... __ ................ _ ..... _.... ____ ................ __ .. J The Ripon JFor1l1lID. SUnl mer 1996 Volume XXXI, No.2 FEATURES 7 The Learning Bush New Governor George W. Bush is as pop­ ular as peppers down in Texas. Is a presi­ dential son preparing to reclaim the old family homestead? By William McKenzie 25 United Government? Is the GOP ready to be ;n control of the White House and Congress? By Bill Frenzel 27 What's Wyoming got on the RNC? The RNC has an historic opportunity to appeal to minorities.
    [Show full text]