Central Provident Fund in Singapore a Capital Market Boost Or a Drag?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Central Provident Fund in Singapore a Capital Market Boost Or a Drag? Central Provident Fund in Singapore A Capital Market Boost or a Drag? Edward Ng Edward Ng is Senior Lecturer at the Department of Finance and Accounting, National University of Singapore 56 A STUDY OF FINANCIAL MARKETS A Brief History ○○○○○○○○○ three years after Singapore became independent from the Malaysian Federation, when CPF savings The Central Provident Fund (CPF) scheme was in- were allowed to be withdrawn for the first time but troduced as the national funded pension scheme on limited to the purchase of government flats. This 1 July 1955 under the British colonial government. was the first policy measure wherein the govern- ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ Although it was evidently a pension fund for retire- ment used CPF savings to achieve national objec- ment, it was not meant to be the single social security tives. This period of the nation’s history was system that it is today. Just before Singapore achieved marked by political and social turmoil. Singapore self-government in 1959, a plan was in place to intro- did not become independent by choice and was duce a social insurance cum public assistance scheme largely considered economically unviable. Popu- to cater to the needy. At first, the scheme covered all lated largely by immigrants, it faced the risk of an employees in Singapore except those working in the exodus, which would have made the country’s col- civil service or contributing to other approved provi- lapse a self-fulfilling prophecy. The government 1 dent funds. This plan was later scrapped, however, thus decided that home ownership was the way to as the first local government in 1959 believed it would make its citizens cast their lot with the new nation. take “available capital resource from other even more With little surplus and private savings, the funds 2 pressing needs.” While the CPF scheme has re- in the CPF accounts were identified as a source of mained as Singapore’s national funded pension valuable financing. Figure 1 shows how CPF sav- scheme over the past four decades, its character has ings have been used to fund the development of substantially changed. It retains its primary role as a government housing projects. pension fund for retirement, but its functions have Figure 1: Circular Flow of Central Provident Fund been expanded to include funding medical expenses Savings to Finance the Construction of as well as property and financial investments. Today, HDB Flats Monthly contribution from employer the CPF Board (Central Provident Fund Board is the Buys SGS official name) is more like a mandatory savings bank, Government CPF Board a significant portion of whose assets can be channeled Deduction Individual from monthly to “desirable” activities like home ownership. salary The evolution of the CPF scheme was not acciden- Buys flat HDB Flat Extends mortgage tal. The scheme came about through a calibrated series Finances loans construction for flat of measures designed to exploit a critical pool of funds Housing and Allocates for Development Pays mortgage in a small developing country. However, one overrid- building Board installment from HDB flats monthly contributions ing principle that has not changed over the years is CPF = Central Provident Fund, HDB = Housing and Development Board, individual responsibility for one’s own future. The SGS = Singapore government securities. emphasis on individual decision making and responsi- bility has always been the central tenet in the manage- By most measures, the policy was a great suc- ment of CPF savings and had a significant influence in cess. Today, about 80 percent of Singapore citizens the development of the securities markets in Singapore. and permanent residents live in government flats. The flats have also become a valuable investment Central Provident Fund as a as most of them command market values more than Financing Tool double their purchase price. There are two landmark events in the development The second major policy change occurred in of the CPF scheme. The first took place in 1968, 1986. That year the government decided to pull the CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND IN SINGAPORE: A CAPITAL MARKET BOOST OR A DRAG? 57 economy out of its most serious recession since ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ Changes in the Central independence. “Sunrise” industries were identified but the securities markets had to be tapped for the Provident Fund Scheme new businesses. Thus, individuals were allowed to In its early years, the CPF scheme was largely invest CPF savings in risky financial assets. This devoted to savings for retirement. The static contri- was not, however, the first time CPF savings could bution rate of 5 percent each by the employer and be invested in the securities market. Early in 1978, the employee on the salary and the undivided indi- CPF members were allowed to invest their savings vidual CPF account quite clearly reflects this objec- in shares of the Singapore Bus Service Ltd. (SBS). tive. If this contribution rate had remained, an indi- SBS shares were, however, not a really risky in- vidual would have consistently set aside 10 percent vestment as the firm was a government-linked of his salary for retirement. monopoly that generated healthy cash flows. Each Not long after the country’s independence, the member was also limited to the purchase of S$5,000 government implemented rapid changes. First, the worth of shares. The 1986 measure was intrinsi- contribution rate was increased almost every year. cally different in terms of the risk profile of the With just three increases starting in 1968, the con- investments allowed. An Approved Investment tribution rate reached 10 percent by 1971, which was Scheme was initiated and has so far been regularly double the original rate. By 1974, the CPF contribu- updated. The original list of approved assets in- tion was 30 percent of a member’s salary. Such a cluded selected blue chip stocks, unit trusts, and high savings rate is evidence of the intent to make gold. CPF more than a pension scheme for retirement. One important aspect has remained unchanged The second change was the departure from the despite the measures to liberalize the use of CPF equal burden on the employee and the employer. The savings. The principal amount plus the accrued contribution rate first became asymmetric in 1972. interest cannot be withdrawn until the member While the employee’s contribution remained at 10 reaches the age of 55. Rather than using his own percent as in the previous year, the employer was money, the CPF member is “borrowing” from his made to contribute 14 percent. This marked the be- savings. Anytime an investment, whether property ginning of the fine-tuning of the CPF scheme to or securities, is liquidated, the CPF Board has the achieve various social and economic objectives. first claim to the principal amount used and any The third change took place in 1977 when the interest that has accrued over the holding period of individual’s CPF account was divided into two the investment. Only after these amounts have been subaccounts. The Special Account was created to returned to the individual’s CPF account can any ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ ensure that a minimum level of financial needs could capital gain be permanently withdrawn. A capital be met at retirement. Funds in this account cannot loss, however, does not need to be reimbursed by be withdrawn except at retirement. Starting at 1 per- the individual. cent of salary, the contribution rate for the Special The CPF scheme is quite clearly not a conven- Account quickly rose to 7 percent in 1979. tional pension system. Carefully timed measures The major portion of the CPF savings goes into have been introduced to allow this increasingly large the Ordinary Account. Since the Special Account is amount of forced savings to be productively em- truly the pension savings, the Ordinary Account is ployed to finance the nation’s development. Appen- aimed at other possible uses. Beyond the regula- dix 1 gives a chronology of these measures. tory minimum percentage for the Special Account, 58 A STUDY OF FINANCIAL MARKETS ○○○○○○○○○ an individual has the option to transfer funds from Figure 2: Approved Uses of Central Provident the Ordinary to the Special Account. A transfer in Fund Savings for Every S$40 of a the opposite direction is, however, not allowed even Member’s Balance if it is to reverse from the Ordinary Account. On the other hand, the Special Account enjoys a slightly S$4 ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ higher interest rate than the Ordinary Account. S$6a In 1984, the CPF account was further divided. Besides the Ordinary and Special Accounts, a third S$30 account called the Medisave Account was created. Funds in this account were specifically targeted at medical expenses, initially for the account holder Ordinary Account (housing, approved investment, CPF insurance, himself and later expanded to cover immediate fam- tertiary education, topping up of parents’ retirement accounts) Medisave Account (hospitalization expenses, hepatitis-B vaccinations, approved outpatient treatments, approved ily members. medical insurance premium) Right from the country’s independence, the gov- Special Account (for old age and contingencies) ernment has intended the CPF scheme to be a cen- a Members above 35 but less than 45 years old are required to contribute S$7 for every S$40 in their CPF balance to the Medisave Account and S$29 to the Ordinary Account. Those above 45 years old tral social and economic policy tool while preserv- need to contribute S$8 to a Medisave Account and S$28 to the ing the savings-for-retirement purpose as much as Ordinary Account. 3 possible. The present CPF scheme is far more than just a pension system. It serves three broad objec- scheme for its economic policies. Beginning 1 Au- tives. The first is to preserve and enhance the gust 1995, all employers were exempted from hav- individual’s integrity.
Recommended publications
  • Doctors' Guide to Working & Living in Singapore
    Doctors’ Guide to Working & Living in Singapore www.headmedical.com Working in Singapore Healthcare System Medical Registration Employment Pass Language Requirements Living in Singapore Housing | Education Utilities | Public Transport Climate | Moving Pets Central Provident Fund & Transferring UK Pensions Health Insurance | Contact Us Cost of Living | Link Library Working in Singapore Healthcare System Healthcare in Singapore is mainly under the responsibility of the Singapore Government’s Ministry of Health, and is designed to ensure that everyone has access to different levels of healthcare in a timely and cost-effective manner. Singapore has 8 public hospitals comprising 6 general hospitals, a women’s and children’s hospital, and a psychiatric hospital. General hospitals provide multi-disciplinary inpatient and specialist outpatient services, and 24-hour emergency departments. Six national specialty centres provide cancer, cardiac, eye, skin, neuroscience and dental care. Medical Registration International medical graduates (IMG) are doctors trained overseas. IMGs holding a degree from a university specified in the Second Schedule of the Medical Registration Act (MRA), a registrable postgraduate medical qualification recognised by the SMC or a specialist qualification recognised for specialist accreditation by the Specialists Accreditation Board (SAB), may apply for conditional registration. Conditional registration allows an international medical graduate to work in an SMC-approved healthcare institution, under the supervision of a
    [Show full text]
  • A Abang-Adik Relationship, 85 Abdul Ghani Othman, 133 Abdul Rahman
    Index 265 INDEX A ASEAN Post-Ministerial Conference abang-adik relationship, 85 (PMC), 182 Abdul Ghani Othman, 133 ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), 182 Abdul Rahman, Tunku see Tunku Asia Europe Meeting (ASEM), 222 Abdul Rahman Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Abdul Razak bin Hussein, 3, 44 (APEC), 182, 222 Abdullah Ahmad, 107 Asian Development Bank, 201 Abdullah Badawi, 4, 47 Asian Development Outlook, 201 cancellation of bridge project, 133 Asian economic crisis Abdullah Sungkar, 192 responses, 220, 221 Abu Bakar Basyir, 192 Asian financial crisis, 46, 143 Abu Bakar Association of Southeast Asian Nations son of Temenggung Ibrahim, 34 (ASEAN), 144 Abu Sayaff group, 193 avian flu, 48 Air Asia Azalina Othman Said, 131 components of, 100 use of Johor as hub, 135 B Al-Hazmi, Nawaf, 192 Baitulmal (Alms Collection Agency), Al-Midhar, Khalid, 192 188 Al-Mukmin Islamic School, 192 Bank Negara Malaysia Al-Qaeda networks, 192 allowing foreign ownership in All-Malaya Council of Joint Action Islamic Banks, 202 (AMCJA), 40 Barisan Sosialis, 65, 141 Alliance Party, 6 fear of it assuming power in UMNO-led, 41 Singapore, 102 AMCJA-PUTERA alliance formation, 101 People’s Constitional Proposal for merger campaign, 56, 57 Malaya, 40 bilateral relationship anak raja, 31 effect of leadership, 143 Anderson, John, 95 major issues, 84, 85 Anglo-Dutch Treaty, 127 bilateral trade, 213, 214 Anglo-Malayan Defence Agreement Binnell, T., 135 (AMDA), 146, 164, 171, 180 Bourdillon, H.T., 13 ASEAN Community Brassey, Lord, 41 goal of creating, 89 bridge issue, 47 ASEAN Declaration
    [Show full text]
  • Included Versus Excluded Funds for Singapore's Central Provident Fund Investors
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business Lee Kong Chian School of Business 2010 What's on the menu? Included versus excluded funds for Singapore's central provident fund investors Seng Kee, Benedict KOH Singapore Management University, [email protected] Olivia S. Mitchell Follow this and additional works at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research Part of the Finance and Financial Management Commons Citation KOH, Seng Kee, Benedict and Mitchell, Olivia S.. What's on the menu? Included versus excluded funds for Singapore's central provident fund investors. (2010). Pensions: An International Journal. 15, (4), 276-286. Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business. Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3005 This Journal Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Lee Kong Chian School of Business at Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business by an authorized administrator of Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. For more information, please email [email protected]. 1 What’s on the Menu? Included versus Excluded Investment Funds for Singapore’s Central Provident Fund Investors Benedict S. K. Koh and Olivia S. Mitchell
    [Show full text]
  • Central Provident Fund (Amendment) Bill
    Central Provident Fund (Amendment) Bill Bill No. 34/2019. Read the first time on 7 October 2019. A BILL intituled An Act to amend the Central Provident Fund Act (Chapter 36 of the 2013 Revised Edition). Be it enacted by the President with the advice and consent of the Parliament of Singapore, as follows: 2 Short title and commencement 1. This Act is the Central Provident Fund (Amendment) Act 2019 and comes into operation on a date that the Minister appoints by notification in the Gazette. 5 Amendment of section 2 2. Section 2(1) of the Central Provident Fund Act (called in this Act the principal Act) is amended — (a) by inserting, immediately after the definition of “chief executive officer”, the following definition: 10 ““collector” means any person or a member of a class of persons, specified by regulations made under section 77(1) to be a person who is required under section 9B to pay an estimated contribution in respect of a 15 self-employed person;”; (b) by inserting, immediately after the definition of “employer”, the following definition: ““estimated contribution” means a contribution to the Fund payable by a collector under 20 section 9B;”; and (c) by inserting, immediately after the definition of “retirement sum”, the following definition: ““revenue payment” means any payment prescribed by regulations made under 25 section 77(1) to be a revenue payment for the purposes of section 9B;”. Amendment of section 5 3. Section 5(4) of the principal Act is amended by deleting the words “a person who is required by any regulations made under 30 section 77(1)(e)” and substituting the words “a self-employed person who is required under section 9A”.
    [Show full text]
  • Votes and Proceedings of the Thirteenth Parliament of Singapore
    VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTEENTH PARLIAMENT OF SINGAPORE Second Session MONDAY, 4 MAY 2020 No. 131 1.30 pm 1 PRESENT: Mr SPEAKER (Mr Tan Chuan-Jin (Marine Parade)). Mr AMRIN AMIN (Sembawang), Senior Parliamentary Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and Ministry of Health. Mr ANG HIN KEE (Ang Mo Kio). Mr ANG WEI NENG (Jurong). Mr BAEY YAM KENG (Tampines), Senior Parliamentary Secretary, Ministry of Transport and Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth. Miss CHERYL CHAN WEI LING (Fengshan). Mr CHAN CHUN SING (Tanjong Pagar), Minister for Trade and Industry. Mr CHEE HONG TAT (Bishan-Toa Payoh), Senior Minister of State, Ministry of Trade and Industry and Ministry of Education. Mr CHEN SHOW MAO (Aljunied). Miss CHENG LI HUI (Tampines). Dr CHIA SHI-LU (Tanjong Pagar). Mr CHARLES CHONG (Punggol East), Deputy Speaker. Mr CHONG KEE HIONG (Bishan-Toa Payoh). Mr DESMOND CHOO (Tampines). Mr DARRYL DAVID (Ang Mo Kio). Mr CHRISTOPHER DE SOUZA (Holland-Bukit Timah). Mr ARASU DURAISAMY (Nominated Member). Mr CEDRIC FOO CHEE KENG (Pioneer). Mr DOUGLAS FOO (Nominated Member). No. 131 4 MAY 2020 2 Ms FOO MEE HAR (West Coast). Ms GRACE FU HAI YIEN (Yuhua), Minister for Culture, Community and Youth and Leader of the House. Mr GAN KIM YONG (Chua Chu Kang), Minister for Health. Mr GOH CHOK TONG (Marine Parade). Assoc Prof DANIEL GOH PEI SIONG (Non-Constituency Member). Mr HENG CHEE HOW (Jalan Besar), Senior Minister of State, Ministry of Defence. Mr HENG SWEE KEAT (Tampines), Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance. Mr TERENCE HO WEE SAN (Nominated Member).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Return
    FORM NO. MGT-7 Annual Return [Pursuant to sub-Section(1) of section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013 and sub-rule (1) of (other than OPCs and Small rule 11of the Companies (Management and Companies) Administration) Rules, 2014] Form language English Hindi Refer the instruction kit for filing the form. I. REGISTRATION AND OTHER DETAILS (i) * Corporate Identification Number (CIN) of the company L85110KA1981PLC013115 Pre-fill Global Location Number (GLN) of the company * Permanent Account Number (PAN) of the company AAACI4798L (ii) (a) Name of the company INFOSYS LIMITED (b) Registered office address ELECTRONICS CITY,HOSUR ROAD, BANGALORE KARNATAKA Karnataka 560100 India (c) *e-mail ID of the company [email protected] (d) *Telephone number with STD code 08041167775 (e) Website www.infosys.com (iii) Date of Incorporation 02/07/1981 (iv) Type of the Company Category of the Company Sub-category of the Company Public Company Company limited by shares Indian Non-Government company (v) Whether company is having share capital Yes No (vi) *Whether shares listed on recognized Stock Exchange(s) Yes No Page 1 of 20 (a) Details of stock exchanges where shares are listed S. No. Stock Exchange Name Code 1 National Stock Exchange of India 1,024 2 BSE Limited 1 (b) CIN of the Registrar and Transfer Agent U72400TG2017PTC117649 Pre-fill Name of the Registrar and Transfer Agent KFIN TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED Registered office address of the Registrar and Transfer Agents Selenium, Tower B, Plot No- 31 & 32, Financial District, Nanakramguda, Serilingampally (vii) *Financial year From date 01/04/2020 (DD/MM/YYYY) To date 31/03/2021 (DD/MM/YYYY) (viii) *Whether Annual general meeting (AGM) held Yes No (a) If yes, date of AGM 19/06/2021 (b) Due date of AGM 30/09/2021 (c) Whether any extension for AGM granted Yes No II.
    [Show full text]
  • Budgeting in Singapore By
    ISSN 1608-7143 OECD JOURNAL ON BUDGETING Volume 6 – No. 1 © OECD 2006 Budgeting in Singapore by Jón R. Blöndal The public finance system of Singapore consists of four “pillars”: the budget sector itself; the Central Provident Fund; the government investment agencies; and various special funds not consolidated into the budget. The budget process is characterised by close interministerial co-operation and the use of constitutional fiscal rules, spending ceilings for ministries (“block budgets”), across-the-board budget extractions (spending cuts), endowment funds, central manpower controls, and continual underspending. Parliament has a limited role. The President of the Republic has an important role as “fiscal guardian”. The article describes these particular features of the Singapore budget process, and discusses other elements of budget implementation and government management such as the organisational structure of the government, the execution of budget appropriations, personnel management, financial management and reporting, and performance and results initiatives. Jón R. Blöndal is Deputy Head, Budgeting and Public Expenditures Division, Public Governance and Territorial Development Directorate, OECD. OECD JOURNAL ON BUDGETING – VOLUME 6 – NO. 1 – ISSN 1608-7143 © OECD 2006 46 – BUDGETING IN SINGAPORE Foreword In an exchange of letters between the Singapore Ministry of Finance and the OECD in early 2006, it was agreed that the OECD would prepare a profile of Singapore’s budgeting process. The profile would offer a general overview of Singapore’s system of budgeting as well as highlighting the many innovative features of budgeting in Singapore. This article is divided into five sections. The first outlines the structure of Singapore’s multi-pillared public finance system.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Underlying Factors That Affected Malaysia-Singapore Relations During the Mahathir Era: Discords and Continuity
    An Analysis of the Underlying Factors That Affected Malaysia-Singapore Relations During the Mahathir Era: Discords and Continuity Rusdi Omar Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Discipline of Politics and International Studies School of History and Politics Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences The University of Adelaide May 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS i ABSTRACT v DECLARATION vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vii ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS ix GLOSSARY xii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Introductory Background 1 1.2. Statement of the Problem 3 1.3. Research Aims and Objectives 5 1.4. Scope and Limitation 6 1.5. Literature Review 7 1.6. Theoretical/ Conceptual Framework 17 1.7. Research Methodology 25 1.8. Significance of Study 26 1.9. Thesis Organization 27 2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF MALAYSIA-SINGAPORE RELATIONS 30 2.1. Introduction 30 2.2. The Historical Background of Malaysia 32 2.3. The Historical Background of Singapore 34 2.4. The Period of British Colonial Rule 38 i 2.4.1. Malayan Union 40 2.4.2. Federation of Malaya 43 2.4.3. Independence for Malaya 45 2.4.4. Autonomy for Singapore 48 2.5. Singapore’s Inclusion in the Malaysian Federation (1963-1965) 51 2.6. The Period after Singapore’s Separation from Malaysia 60 2.6.1. Tunku Abdul Rahman’s Era 63 2.6.2 Tun Abdul Razak’s Era 68 2.6.3. Tun Hussein Onn’s Era 76 2.7. Conclusion 81 3 CONTENTIOUS ISSUES IN MALAYSIA-SINGAPORE RELATIONS 83 3.1. Introduction to the Issues Affecting Relations Between Malaysia and Singapore 83 3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Statutes of the Republic of Singapore Central Provident Fund Act (Chapter
    THE STATUTES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND ACT (CHAPTER 36) (Original Enactment: Ordinance 34 of 1953) REVISED EDITION 2013 (30th June 2013) Prepared and Published by THE LAW REVISION COMMISSION UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISED EDITION OF THE LAWS ACT (CHAPTER 275) Informal Consolidation – version in force from 1/4/2021 CHAPTER 36 2013 Ed. Central Provident Fund Act ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title 2. Interpretation 3. Establishment and constitution of Central Provident Fund Board 4. Membership of Board 4A. Appointment of officers and employees 5. Appointment of inspectors 5A. Budget 5B. Issue of shares, etc. 5C. Symbol or representation of Board 5D. Directions by Minister PART II CONTRIBUTIONS TO FUND 6. Establishment of Central Provident Fund 7. Rates of contributions 8. Agreement by statutory body to pay excess contributions deemed void 9. Payment of interest on contributions in arrears 9A. Contributions by self-employed person 9B. Estimated contributions by collectors 9C. Waiver of contributions 9D. Disclosure and provision of information to facilitate administration of contributions under section 9A or 9B 10. Expenses, etc. 11. Financial provisions 12. Contributions to be paid into Fund 13. Crediting of contributions and interest into subsidiary accounts, etc. 1 Informal Consolidation – version in force from 1/4/2021 2013 Ed. Central Provident Fund CAP.36 2 Section 13A. Power to impose conditions relating to contributions by self- employed persons 13B. Voluntary contributions 13C. Other contributions to Fund 14. Payment of cash grant by Government or other payments into Fund 14A. Loan by Government to member PART III WITHDRAWAL OF CONTRIBUTIONS 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Provident Fund (Public Sector Employees) (Amendment) Regulations 2019
    CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND (PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYEES) (AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS 2019 S.L. 659 of 2019 Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 78(2) of the Central Provident Fund Act. Ordered by Parliament to lie upon the Table: 23 May 2019 (Vide Notifi cation No. S 376 in the Gazette Subsidiary Legislation Supplement No. 19 of 10 May 2019). CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND ACT (CHAPTER 36) CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND (PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYEES) (AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS 2019 In exercise of the powers conferred by section 77(1)(q) of the Central Provident Fund Act, the Minister for Manpower, after consulting with the Central Provident Fund Board, makes the following Regulations: Citation and commencement 1. These Regulations are the Central Provident Fund (Public Sector Employees) (Amendment) Regulations 2019 and come into operation on 10 May 2019. Amendment of regulation 5 2. Regulation 5 of the Central Provident Fund (Public Sector Employees) Regulations 2011 (G.N. No. S 106/2011) is amended — (a) by deleting the words “at the age of 55 years” in paragraph (4); and (b) by inserting, immediately after paragraph (4), the following paragraph: “(5) In this regulation — “applicable charge” means any charge or undertaking under section 15(9), (9A), (10), (10A), (11D) or (11E), 21(1), 21A(1), 21B(1), 27C(1)(v), 27D(1)(v), 27DA(1)(v), 27E(1)(iv) or 27F(1)(iv) of the Act that satisfies the requirement in regulation 4B(2) of the Central Provident Fund (Revised 2 Retirement Sum Scheme) Regulations (Rg 2) or regulation 4B(2) of the Central Provident Fund (New Retirement
    [Show full text]
  • Utilizing FDI to Stay Ahead: the Case of Singapore Penelope B
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Georgia State University Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University International Business Faculty Publications Institute of International Business 2012 Utilizing FDI to Stay Ahead: The aC se of Singapore Penelope B. Prime Georgia State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/intlbus_facpub Part of the International Business Commons Recommended Citation Prime, Penelope B., "Utilizing FDI to Stay Ahead: The asC e of Singapore" (2012). International Business Faculty Publications. 32. http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/intlbus_facpub/32 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Institute of International Business at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Business Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Utilizing FDI to Stay Ahead: The Case of Singapore Penelope B. Prime, Ph.D.1 Abstract: A country of five million people in 710 square kilometers, Singapore has built itself into an integral part of global markets with living standards that are among the highest in the world. The purpose of this article is to apply a capabilities-based approach to understand how a small, resource-scarce country dependent on global markets has done so well. The core of Singapore’s success has been the continuous updating and expanding of domestic social capabilities to meet the needs of foreign companies. Government policies were hyper-sensitive to providing conditions for foreign firms to be successful.
    [Show full text]
  • The Singapore Healthcare System: an Overview
    The Singapore Healthcare System CHAPTER 1 The Singapore Healthcare System: An Overview Singapore has achieved extraordinary results both in the high quality of its healthcare system and in controlling the cost of care. In per capita terms and as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), its health- care expenditures are the lowest of all the high-income countries in the world. How did this happen? How has Singapore been able to achieve these kinds of results? e answers are bigger than just the process of putting a healthcare system together. ere are larger factors that have to do with the spirit and philosophy of Singapore itself, the way it is governed, how the government approaches domestic issues, and how it deals with the world. In my study of Singapore, I have found three compelling qualities woven into the fabric of the country that have enabled it to achieve outstanding successes in so many areas, healthcare included. ey are long- term political unity, the ability to recognize and establish national priorities, and the consistent desire for collective well-being and social harmony of the country. Political Unity and Constancy of Purpose From the time the British withdrew from Singapore and left its former colony to fend for itself, Singapore has been able to develop and grow as an integrated whole. e People’s Action Party (PAP) has been in power since independence, resulting in sustained political stability. Along with stability has come a unity and constancy of purpose and action throughout Affordable Excellence combined t1 1 3/21/2013 7:12:50 PM Affordable Excellence government.
    [Show full text]