8/11/2021 Quality Management Journal Journal Impact IF 2020-2021 | Analysis, Trend, Ranking & Prediction
Academic Accelerator / Journal Impact IF / Quality Management Journal Quality Management Journal Journal Impact IF - Analysis · Trend · Prediction · Ranking Homepage · Submit Manuscript
2 Year IF 3 Year IF 4 Year IF 5 Year IF Real-Time IF
ADVERTISEMENT Ads by Stop seeing Pthisor ad tableWhy this ad? Optical CMM Accurate, Fast & Easy to Use. Fast Shop Floor Measurements. Creaform Insensitive to Instabilities
New Journal Impact IF 2019-2020 1.2 30.0%
Journal Impact IF Trend
Related Journals Search Journals https://academic-accelerator.com/Impact-Factor-IF/Quality-Management-Journal 1/14 8/11/2021 Quality Management Journal Journal Impact IF 2020-2021 | Analysis, Trend, Ranking & Prediction
Journal of International Business Studies Academy of Management Review Brookings Papers on Economic Activity
Academy of Management Journal Harvard Business Review International Journal of Production Economics
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management Journal of Intellectual Capital Small Business Economics
Supply Chain Management Journal of Business Ethics Journal of Small Business Management Industry and Innovation
Journal of Business and Psychology International Journal of Health Geographics British Journal of Management
Review of Managerial Science Total Quality Management and Business Excellence R and D Management
ACM Transactions on Information Systems Management Decision Journal of Conflict Resolution
Business Ethics Quarterly Organization Review of Accounting Studies Journal of Common Market Studies
BRQ Business Research Quarterly Corporate Governance Economic and Industrial Democracy Eurasian Business Review
Multinational Business Review Competition and Change International Journal of Stress Management
British Journal of Industrial Relations Decision Sciences Managerial Auditing Journal
Computer Law and Security Review Journal of Management Inquiry Journal of Wine Economics IMF Economic Review
Journal of Evolutionary Economics Journal of Economics and Management Strategy Feminist Economics
Public Money and Management Journal of Futures Markets Asia Europe Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication International Journal of Selection and Assessment Economic Inquiry
Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry Clothing and Textiles Research Journal Contemporary Economic Policy
Australian Journal of Management Chinese Management Studies International Journal of Emerging Markets
European Journal of Industrial Relations Journal of Industrial Economics Journal of Portfolio Management
Jahrbucher für Nationalokonomie und Statistik Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics Journal of Economic Issues
American Bankruptcy Law Journal Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung und Praxis More Related Journals
Wireless Portable CMM
Outperform Traditional Portable CMMs on the Shop Floor. Get a
Creaform Free Live Demo.
ADVERTISEMENT https://academic-accelerator.com/Impact-Factor-IF/Quality-Management-Journal 2/14 8/11/2021 Quality Management Journal Journal Impact IF 2020-2021 | Analysis, Trend, Ranking & Prediction ADVERTISEMENT
Porable CMM: 3D Measurements
Outperorm Traditional Porable CMMs on the Shop Floor. Get a Free Live Demo.
Creaform Learn More
Popular Journals
nature scientific reports nature communications plos one science pnas science advances
cell iscience lancet acs applied materials & interfaces advanced materials
proceedings of the national academy of sciences journal of the american chemical society
international journal of molecular sciences ieee access science of the total environment chemical engineering journal
sustainability william and mary quarterly
Quality Management Journal The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of Quality Management Journal is 1.2, which is just updated in 2020. — Quality Management Journal Journal Impact IF
Quality Management Journal Impact Factor
Highest IF Lowest IF 1.2 0.621
Key Factor Analysis Key Factor Analysis
Total Growth Rate Annual Growth Rate 29.2% 4.9%
Key Factor Analysis Key Factor Analysis
ADVERTISEMENT
https://academic-accelerator.com/Impact-Factor-IF/Quality-Management-Journal 3/14 8/11/2021 Quality Management Journal Journal Impact IF 2020-2021 | Analysis, Trend, Ranking & Prediction
Porable CMM: 3D Measurements
Outperorm Traditional Porable CMMs on the Shop Floor. Get a Free Live Demo.
Creaform Learn More
Journal Impact IF Ranking
Subcategory Quartile Rank Percentile
General Business,Management and Accounting Q2 79/221 General Business,Management and Accounting 64%
Key Factor Analysis
https://academic-accelerator.com/Impact-Factor-IF/Quality-Management-Journal 4/14 8/11/2021 Quality Management Journal Journal Impact IF 2020-2021 | Analysis, Trend, Ranking & Prediction
00:00/01:00 HONG-KONG-PLACES-TO-VISIT
Quality Management Journal Impact Factor 2020-2021 Prediction
Quality Management Journal Impact Factor Predition System
Quality Management Journal Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community. — Impact Factor Predition System
Predict
Check All Preditions
Total Publications Total Citations 862 10253
Annual Publication Volume
Annual Citation Record
https://academic-accelerator.com/Impact-Factor-IF/Quality-Management-Journal 5/14 8/11/2021 Quality Management Journal Journal Impact IF 2020-2021 | Analysis, Trend, Ranking & Prediction
International Collaboration Trend
Cited Documents Trend
Journal Impact IF History
Display 5 records per page Search:
Year Journal Impact IF
2019-2020 1.2
2018-2019 0.923
2017-2018 0.621
2016-2017 1.0
2015-2016 0.935
Year Journal Impact IF
Showing 1 to 5 of 9 records Previous 1 2 Next
Key Factor Analysis
https://academic-accelerator.com/Impact-Factor-IF/Quality-Management-Journal 6/14 8/11/2021 Quality Management Journal Journal Impact IF 2020-2021 | Analysis, Trend, Ranking & Prediction
Publications Cites Dataset
Display 5 records per page Search:
Year Publications Citations
2021 3 51
2020 24 536
2019 40 515
2018 35 475
2017 24 436
Year Publications Citations
Showing 1 to 5 of 29 records Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Key Factor Analysis
What is Impact Factor? The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.
Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The Quality Management Journal Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2020) by papers published in the Quality Management Journal during the two preceding years (2018-2019). Note that 2020 Impact Factor are reported in 2021; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2020 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1 are known zero values Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other https://academic-accelerator.com/Impact-Factor-IF/Quality-Management-Journal 7/14 2/19/2021 Quality Management Journal: Vol 28, No 1
Log in | Register
Home All Journals Quality Management Journal List of Issues Volume 28, Issue 1
Quality Management Journal
Publish open access in this journal
Publishes empirical and theoretical articles, including case studies. The Quality Management Journal seeks articles that inform research and practice.
Advanced search
Submit an article New content alerts RSS Subscribe Citation search
Current issue Browse list of issues Explore An o cial journal of the American Society for Quality
About this journal
Your research. Your choice. How-to guide for authors. https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/uqmj20/current 1/4 2/19/2021 Quality Management Journal: Vol 28, No 1
See all volumes and issues
Volume 28, 2021 Vol 27, 2020 Vol 26,
Issue 1
Browse by section (All) Display order (Default)
Download citations Download PDFs
Quality Management Journal, Volume 28, Issue 1 (2021)
Editorial
Editorial Editor’s overview
S. Thomas Foster Page: 1 Published online: 17 Dec 2020
127 0 Altmetric Views CrossRef citations
Article
Article Selecting the best quality inspection alternative based on the quality, economic and environmental considerations
Feri Afrinaldi & Harly Bobby Pratama Pages: 2-16 Published online: 25 Nov 2020
97 0 Altmetric Views CrossRef citations
Review Article https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/uqmj20/current 2/4 2/19/2021 Quality Management Journal: Vol 28, No 1
Review article The role of internet of things in food supply chain quality management: A review
Mohamed Ben-Daya, Elka Hassini, Zied Bahroun & Bayan H. Banimfreg Pages: 17-40 Published online: 08 Dec 2020
184 2 Altmetric Views CrossRef citations
Article
Article An empirical study on quality improvement in higher education institutions with reference to selected processes
Rahul V. Mulay & Vandana Tandon Khanna Pages: 41-56 Published online: 10 Dec 2020
57 0 Altmetric Views CrossRef citations
Explore
Most read articles Most cited articles Open access articles
https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/uqmj20/current 3/4 2/19/2021 Quality Management Journal: Vol 28, No 1
Information for Open access
Authors Overview Editors Open journals Librarians Open Select Societies Cogent OA Dove Medical Press F1000Research Help and info Keep up to date
Help & contact Register to receive personalised research and resources by email Newsroom Sign me up Commercial services Advertising information All journals Books
Copyright © 2021 Informa UK Limited Privacy policy Cookies Terms & conditions Accessibility
Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067 5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG
https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/uqmj20/current 4/4 2/19/2021 Quality Management Journal Editorial Board
Log in | Register
Home All Journals Quality Management Journal Editorial Board
Journal Quality Management Journal
About this journal
Editorial board
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF S. Thomas Foster Jr.- Brigham Young University
EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD Sanjay Ahire- University of South Carolina Robert Batson- University of Alabama Edwin Cheng- Hong Kong Polytechnic University Joy Field- Boston College Barbara Flynn- Indiana University Larry Fredendall- Clemson University Soumen Ghosh- Georgia Tech University Susan Goldstein- University of Minnesota John Gray- Ohio State University Jan Hartley- Bowling Green State University Antony Jiju- Heriot Watt University Hale Kaynak- University of Texas - Pan American Peter Letmathe- RWTH Aachen University, Germany Kevin Linderman- Penn State University Victor Prybutok- University of North Texas Aleda Roth- Clemson University Scott Sampson- Brigham Young University Xiande Zhao- CEIBS
EDITORIAL REVIEW BOARD George Ball - University of Indiana https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=editorialBoard&journalCode=uqmj20 1/4 2/19/2021 Quality Management Journal Editorial Board Duane Beck - Rochester Institute of Technology Ram Bishu- University of Nebraska Aravind Chandrasekaran- Ohio State University Adrian S. Choo- Michigan State University Lori Cook- Depaul University Charles Corbett- UCLA Sime Curkovich- Western Michigan University Jay Daniel- University of Derby Sarv Devaraj- University of Notre Dame Ana Feger- University of Ohio Joy Field- Boston College John Gardner- Brigham Young University Peter Golder- Dartmouth College Anandasivam Gopal- University of Maryland John Grout- Berry College Leopoldo Gutierrez- Universidad De Granada Douglas Hales- University of Rhode Island Janelle Heineke- Boston University Jamison Kovach- University of Houston Robert Landeros- Western Michigan University Deborah Manzo- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Giuliano Marodin- University of South Carolina Gerolamo Mateus Cecilio- University of Sao Paulo Yoshiki Matsui- Yokohama National University Kathleen L. McFadden- Northern Illinois University Debanjan Mitra- University of Connecticut Anand Nair- Michigan State University Rogelio Oliva- Texas A&M University Ceyhun Ozgur- Valparaiso University Nicole Radziwill- James Madison University Sampath Rajagopalan- University of Southern California Alvaro Rosa- Instituto Universitario de Lisboa Eve Rosenzweig- Emory University Borut Rusjan- University of Ljubljana, Slovenia Paulo Sampaio- University of Minho, Portugal Danny Samson- University of Melbourne, Australia Joseph Sarkis- Worcester Plytechnic Bill Sawaya - Bowling Green Street University https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=editorialBoard&journalCode=uqmj20 2/4 2/19/2021 Quality Management Journal Editorial Board Robert Schmitt- RWTH Aachen University, Germany Shane Schvaneveldt- Weber State Rui Sousa- Catolica Porto Business School, Portugal John Surak- Clemson University Kevin Taa e- Clemson University Mile Terziovski- Swinburne University, United Kingdom Matthias Thurer- Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil Anita Tucker- Boston University Don Wardell Andy Yeung- Hong Kong Polytechnic University Eden Yin- Cambridge University He Zhen- Tianjin University, China Xingxing Zu- Morgan State University
https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=editorialBoard&journalCode=uqmj20 3/4 2/19/2021 Quality Management Journal Editorial Board
Information for Open access
Authors Overview Editors Open journals Librarians Open Select Societies Cogent OA Dove Medical Press F1000Research Help and info Keep up to date
Help & contact Register to receive personalised research and resources by email Newsroom Sign me up Commercial services Advertising information All journals Books
Copyright © 2021 Informa UK Limited Privacy policy Cookies Terms & conditions Accessibility
Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067 5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG
https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=editorialBoard&journalCode=uqmj20 4/4 FA Dashboard Author search Sources
Document details
of Export Download More... ▻ Cited by documents
Quality Management Journal Volume , Issue , November , Pages - Inform me when this document Selecting the best quality inspection alternative based on the quality, economic is cited in Scopus: Set citation Set citation and environmental considerations (Article) alert ▻ feed ▻ Afrinaldi, F., Pratama, H.B. Related documents View additional authors
Save all to author list Find more related documents in Scopus based on: Department of Industrial Engineering, Andalas University, Padang, Indonesia
View additional a liations Authors ▻ Keywords ▻
Abstract The use of inspection is unavoidable in many situations. For example, inspection is required to satisfy government regulation, guarantee quality parameter is met by the products supplied by new suppliers whose quality history has not been built, and mitigate product liability risks. There are three quality inspection alternatives, percent inspection, no inspection, and sampling inspection. No inspection brings a considerable risk of shipping non- conforming products to the consumer. percent inspection involves a slight risk of delivering non-conforming products to the consumer but consumes resources signi cantly. Sampling inspection requires the producer to judge products based on a random sample. Therefore, it still contains the risk of sending non-conforming products to the consumer. The risk and resource consumptions can cause the producer to bear for the cost and environmental impact due to rework, scrap, and transportation. This paper proposes a mathematical model and algorithm to select the best inspection alternative based on quality, economic, and environmental considerations. We apply the model and algorithm to solve a real industrial case study. The results of the case study show that the proposed method results in
a lower expected total cost and CO emission and a better level of protection for the producer and consumer than the single sampling plan method widely used. We expect that the proposed model and algorithm can assist practitioners in the industry to select the best inspection alternative. It is essential to note that sampling inspection is not a substitute for proper process monitoring and control. © American Society for Quality. All rights reserved.
SciVal Topic Prominence
Topic: Acceptance Sampling | Average Sample Number | Process Capability Index
Prominence percentile: .
Author keywords
Algorithm Cost Environmental impact Inspection Quality
Funding details
Funding sponsor Funding number Acronym
/UN. .
/ We would like to thank the Journal Publication Grant of the Faculty of Engineering, Andalas University, Contract No. /UN. . .D/PL , for its nancial support during the revision process.
ISSN: DOI: . / . . Source Type: Journal Document Type: Article Original language: English Publisher: American Society for Quality
Afrinaldi, F.; Department of Industrial Engineering, Andalas University, Padang, Indonesia © Copyright Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
About Scopus Language Customer Service
What is Scopus ⽇本語に切り替える Help Content coverage 切换到简体中文 Contact us Scopus blog 切換到繁體中文 Scopus API Русский язык Privacy matters
Terms and conditions ↗ Privacy policy ↗
Copyright © Elsevier B.V ↗. All rights reserved. Scopus® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies.
/ 2/19/2021 Quality Management Journal
also developed by scimago: SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS
Scimago Journal & Country Rank Enter Journal Title, ISSN or Publisher Name
Home Journal Rankings Country Rankings Viz Tools Help About Us
Best Minecraft Server Hosting
Start Your Own Minecraft Server With Instant Setup And 24/7 Live Chat.
Shockbyte OPEN
Quality Management Journal
COUNTRY SUBJECT AREA AND PUBLISHER H-INDEX CATEGORY
United States American Society for Business, Management Quality 11 Universities and and Accounting research institutions in Business, United States Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
PUBLICATION TYPE ISSN COVERAGE INFORMATION
Journals 10686967 2013-2020 Homepage
How to publish in this journal
SCOPE
Quality Management Journal (QMJ) is the rst journal to link the efforts of academic researchers and quality management practitioners. QMJ provides a forum for communicating and discussing research ndings. New research that scienti cally explores the principles of quality management is actively sought for the journal. Quality Management Journal (QMJ) is primarily an empirical research journal. To be appropriate, an article should be grounded in methods and theory.
Join the conversation about this journal
Quartiles https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=21100268418&tip=sid 1/5 2/19/2021 Quality Management Journal
FIND SIMILAR JOURNALS
1 2 3 4 Total Quality Management Operations Management International Journal of TQM Journa and Business Excellence Research Productivity and GBR USA GBR GBR 43% 42% 41% 4 similarity similarity similarity s
SJR Citations per document
0.6The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that This2 indicator counts the number of citations received by ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is documents from a journal and divides them by the total 0.4based on the idea that 'all citations are not created number of documents published in that journal. The equal'. SJR is a measure of scienti c in uence of 1.6chart shows the evolution of the average number of 0.2 journals that accounts for both the number of citations times documents published in a journal in the past two, receiv0 ed by a journal and the importance or prestige of three and four years have been cited in the current year. 1.2 the journals where such citations come from It The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 measures the scienti c in uence of the average article ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric. in a journal it expresses how central to the global 0.8
Total Cites Self-Cites Cites per document Year Value Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2013 0.000 0.4 60 Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2014 0.929 self-citations received by a journal's published Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2015 0.935 documents during the three previous years. Cites0 / Doc. (4 years) 2016 0.891 30 Journal Self-citation is de ned as the number of citation Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2017 0.933 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 from a journal citing article to articles published by the Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2018 1.724 Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2019 1.278 same journal. Cites / Doc. (4 years) 0 CitesCites / Doc./ Doc. (3 (3 y years)ears) 2013 0.000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 CitesCites / Doc./ Doc. (3 (2 y years)ears) 2014 0.929 Cites Year Value Cites / Doc. (3 years) 2015 0.935 S lf Cit 2013 0
External Cites per Doc Cites per Doc % International Collaboration
1.4Evolution of the number of total citation per document 21International Collaboration accounts for the articles that and external citation per document (i.e. journal self- have been produced by researchers from several citations removed) received by a journal's published 14countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's 0.7 documents during the three previous years. External documents signed by researchers from more than one 7 citations are calculated by subtracting the number of country; that is including more than one country address. self-citations0 from the total number of citations received 0 by the journal’s documents. Year International Collaboration 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2013 16.67 Cit Y V l 2014 4 76
Citable documents Non-citable documents Cited documents Uncited documents
Not every article in a journal is considered primary Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research not cited during the following year. https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=21100268418&tip=sid 2/5 2/19/2021 Quality Management Journal
60(research articles, conference papers and reviews) in 60 Documents Year Value three year windows vs. those documents other than Uncited documents 2013 0 research articles, reviews and conference papers. Uncited documents 2014 10 30 30 Uncited documents 2015 20 Documents Year Value Uncited documents 2016 26
← Show this widget in your own website
Just copy the code below and paste within your html code: