Melting of Two-Dimensional Tunable-Diameter Colloidal Crystals
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PHYSICAL REVIEW E 77, 041406 ͑2008͒ Melting of two-dimensional tunable-diameter colloidal crystals Y. Han,* N. Y. Ha,† A. M. Alsayed, and A. G. Yodh Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, 209 South 33rd Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396, USA ͑Received 12 February 2007; revised manuscript received 24 November 2007; published 18 April 2008͒ Melting of two-dimensional colloidal crystals is studied by video microscopy. The samples were composed of microgel spheres whose diameters could be temperature tuned, and whose pair potentials were measured to be short ranged and repulsive. We observed two-step melting from the crystal to a hexatic phase and from the hexatic to the liquid phase as a function of the temperature-tunable volume fraction. The translational and orientational susceptibilities enabled us to definitively determine the phase transition points, avoiding ambigu- ities inherent in other analyses and resolving a “dislocation precursor stage” in the solid phase that some of the traditional analyses may incorrectly associate with the hexatic phase. A prefreezing stage of the liquid with ordered patches was also found. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.041406 PACS number͑s͒: 82.70.Ϫy, 64.60.Cn, 64.70.DϪ I. INTRODUCTION to follow the spatiotemporal evolution of the same sample area through the entire sequence of transitions. This feature ͑ ͒ Two-dimensional 2D melting is a classic problem in is attractive and was not realized in previous colloidal melt- ͓ ͔ condensed matter physics 1 , and, over the years, theories ing experiments which employed samples composed of attempting to understand 2D melting have emphasized topo- charged spheres in the wedge geometry with density gradi- ͓ ͔ ͓ ͔ logical defects 2–5 , geometrical defects 6 , and grain ents ͓11͔, nor in experiments that employed samples com- ͓ ͔ boundaries 7 . The most popular model for understanding posed of hard spheres in many different concentration- the transition is Kosterlitz-Thouless-Halperin-Nelson-Young dependent cells ͓12͔. The temperature-sensitive samples ͑ ͒ ͓ ͔ KTHNY theory 2–5 , which predicts two-step melting, employed herein start in the equilibrium crystal phase and from the crystal to a hexatic phase and then from the hexatic reequilibrate rapidly after each tiny temperature jump. There- to a liquid phase. The intermediate hexatic phase has short- fore, they are unlikely to be trapped in metastable glassy range translational and quasi-long-range orientational order, states during melting. Beautiful recent experiments using and the two transitions are beautifully characterized by the magnetic spheres with tunable dipole-dipole interactions creation, binding, and unbinding of topological defects, i.e., ͓13–15͔ share some of these advantages but also differ from dislocations and disclinations, respectively. Experimenters the present experiments in a complementary way as a result have sought out these features across a wide range of mate- of their long-range dipolar interactions. ͓ ͔ rials, including monolayers of molecules and electrons 1 , We measured a variety of sample properties during melt- ͓ ͔ ͓ ͔ liquid crystals 8 , superconductors 9 , diblock copolymers ing, including radial distribution functions, structure factors, ͓ ͔ ͓ ͔ 10 , and colloidal suspensions 11–16 . Some experiments topological defect densities, dynamic Lindemann parameters and simulations have demonstrated substantial agreement ͓13͔, translational and orientational order parameters, and or- with KTHNY theory, but others exhibit deviations and am- der parameter correlation functions in space and time. In this ͓ ͔ biguities possibly due to finite-size effects 1 , the interaction process we discovered that the order parameter susceptibility, ͓ ͔ ͓ ͔ range and form 16 , and out-of-plane fluctuations 17,18 .In i.e., the order parameter fluctuations, proved superior for our view, the collection of evidence clearly points to the finding phase transition points compared to other analyses validity of the KTHNY scenario in 2D systems with long- which typically suffer finite-size and/or finite-time ambigu- ͓ ͔ range interaction potentials 13–15,19 , but the evidence is ities. The susceptibility method has been applied in simula- less convincing in systems with short-range interactions tions ͓17,21͔, but to our knowledge has not been applied in ͓ ͔ 20–24 . Consequently it remains desirable to explore the imaging experiments. Using this method, we clearly resolved phenomena in other model systems, especially those with the intermediate hexatic phase, and we identified a “disloca- short-ranged interactions. tion precursor stage” in the crystal phase that traditional In this paper we examine 2D melting in a colloidal sys- analyses sometimes incorrectly assign to the hexatic phase. tem. The pair potential between particles in this colloidal In addition, the functional form of the susceptibility near the suspension is short ranged and repulsive, and the sphere di- phase transition points, e.g., divergences or discontinuities, ameter is thermally sensitive, so that temperature tuning can can be used to determine the order of the phase transition. be used to vary the sample volume fraction and drive the melting transition. Temperature-sensitive particles enable us II. EXPERIMENT A. Sample preparation and characterization *Present address: Department of Physics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong. The samples consisted of a monolayer of N-isopropyl †Present address: Department of Physics, Ajou University, Suwon acrylamide ͑NIPA͒ spheres confined between two glass cov- 443-749, Korea. erslips. We synthesized NIPA microgel spheres by free- 1539-3755/2008/77͑4͒/041406͑7͒ 041406-1 ©2008 The American Physical Society HAN et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW E 77, 041406 ͑2008͒ radical polymerization ͓25͔ and suspended them in buffer 4 (A) ρ=0.909 (26.9°C) (B) solution ͑pH=4.0, 20 mM acetic acid͒. The NIPA polymer ° becomes less hydrophilic at high temperature ͓26͔, and there- 3 30 C ° T] 24 C fore the sphere diameter decreases with increasing tempera- B ture as water moves out of the microgel particle. Dynamic [k ) 2 r light scattering measurements found the NIPA sphere hydro- ( dynamic diameter to vary linearly from 950 nm at 20 °C to u 740 nm at 30 °C and showed that sphere polydispersity was 1 ↓ less than 3%. Such small polydispersity should not affect the ͓ ͔ nature of the melting process 27 . The cleaned glass sur- 0 ↑ faces were coated with a layer of 100-nm-diameter NIPA 0.5 1r[µm] 1.5 spheres to prevent particle sticking. A simple geometrical ρ=0.890 (27.5°C) (C) ρ=0.858 (27.9°C) (D) calculation showed that 100 nm close packed spheres on the surface give rise to ϳ3 nm surface roughness for the 800- nm-diameter spheres. This surface roughness is negligible compared to sphere polydispersity and wall separation fluc- tuations. In addition, our observations of the large sphere motions at lower concentrations did not find evidence of preferential spatial locations, i.e., of significant surface po- tentials. The dense monolayer of 800 nm spheres formed crystal domains within the sample cell of typical size ϳ͑40 m͒2, ͑ ͒ ͑ ͒ ͑ ͒ corresponding to ϳ3000 particles. Measurements were car- FIG. 1. a Pair potential u r of NIPA spheres at 24 squares ͑ ͒ ried out on a ϳ͑20 m͒2 central area away from the grain and 30 °C circles . Arrows indicate corresponding hydrodynamic ͑ ͒ ͑ ͒ boundaries. In practice we found that grain boundaries af- radius measured by dynamic light scattering. b – d : Typical 10 s fected only a few neighboring lines of particles, and that particle trajectories in the crystal, hexatic, and liquid phases, respectively. melting started from both inside crystal domains and at grain boundaries. This behavior differs qualitatively from grain- boundary melting in 3D ͓25͔ and edge melting in 2D ͓28͔, temperature using the method described in Ref. ͓31͔. From wherein melting starts from grain boundaries or edges and g͑r͒, we applied liquid structure theory to extract ͓32͔ the then propagates into the crystal. Our observations suggest pair potentials u͑r͒ shown in Fig. 1. Note that the potentials that interfacial energies for liquid nucleation from anywhere are short ranged and repulsive. The effective particle diam- ϳ within the crystal are similar to those near grain boundaries. eter at 1kBT is 10% smaller than the hydrodynamic diam- It appears that melting starts nearly simultaneously through- eter measured by dynamic light scattering. Herein we use the out the crystal. hydrodynamic diameter for defining the areal density 2 The sample was heated very slowly in 0.1 °C steps for a =n /4, where n is the areal number density. few minutes, and the measurements were taken after the tem- perature stabilized. We did not observe convection, even in B. Order parameter correlations in space and time samples with smaller particles at much lower volume frac- Figures 1͑b͒–1͑d͒ show typical particle trajectories in the tions. The sample cell was approximately 1 m thick, much three phases. In KTHNY theory, the traditional way to dis- smaller than the 1-mm-thick glass slide on which it was tinguish phases derives from the shapes of the order param- mounted. The temperature difference across the slide was eter correlation functions. For our analysis we first labeled ͑ ͒ about 5 °C, so the gradient across the sample was very small each particle by xj ,yj ,t, 6j , Tj . Here t is time, 6j ͑Ͻ ͒ ͚͑nn 6i jk͒/N 0.01 °C . Furthermore, the Reynolds number of water at = k=1e is the orientational order parameter, and iG·rj this 1 m scale is small, making convection unlikely. Be- Tj=e is the translational order parameter for particle j at ͑ ͒ fore starting the measurements we cycled the samples once position rj = xj ,yj . jk is the angle of the bond between or twice above the melting point in order to relieve any pos- particle j and its neighbor k.