DOCSLIB.ORG

Ethnic and Cultural Identity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ethnic and Cultural Identity Republican and Democrat Pundits on the topic of Ethnic and Cultural Identity Dan Hegelund Supervisor Mats Lindberg Seminar, 2013-01-17 Political Science D Master-level thesis, 15 ECTS Fall 2012 _______________________________________________________ !1 Republican and Democrat Pundits on the topic of Ethnic and Cultural Identity Abstract A Master-level Thesis in Political Science by Dan Hegelund, winter 2012. “Republican and Democrat pundits on the topic of Ethnic and Cultural Identity”. Supervisor: Mats Lindberg. This thesis seeks to analyze the discourse of Republican and Democrat pundits on the topic of Ethnic and Cultural Identity. The thesis contains a quantitative and a qualitative part. The quantitative part is a text content analysis, on the topic of Ethnic and Cultural Identity, of fifteen books authored by the most influential political pundits in America today. The qualitative part is a debate analysis, on the topic of Ethnic and Cultural Identity, of Patrick Buchanan, Michael Medved, Juan Williams, and Ed Schultz, through the theoretical framework of Samuel Huntington, Amartya Sen, and Seyla Benhabib. The thesis concludes that the differences between Republican and Democrat discourse on the topic of Ethnic and Cultural Identity are minor, although there is a pattern of Republican pundits being more outspoken about the topic than Democrat pundits. Keywords: Amartya Sen, Civilization, Conflict, Culture, Diversity, Ed Schultz, Ethnicity, Globalization, Identity, Immigration, Juan Williams, Michael Medved, Multiculturalism, Patrick Buchanan, Pundits, Samuel Huntington, Seyla Benhabib, Universalism. !2 Republican and Democrat Pundits on the topic of Ethnic and Cultural Identity Table of Contents Title Page Abstract Table of Contents Part I: Rationale for the thesis................................................................................ 1 Chapter 1: The Problem............................................................................................. 1 1.1 The rise of the punditocracy............................................................. 2 1.2 The significance of party-affiliation................................................. 6 1.3 Relevance of the Study..................................................................... 9 1.4 Aim and Objectives.......................................................................... 10 1.5 Definition of Terms.......................................................................... 11 Chapter 2: Methodological Framework................................................................... 16 2.1 Method............................................................................................. 16 2.2 Choosing the Empirical Material..................................................... 25 Part II: Theory...................................................................................................... 26 Chapter 3: Theory Introduction.............................................................................. 26 Chapter 4: Research Question 1 – To what degree are people’s different ethnic and cultural identity a contributing cause of conflict?.................................................... 27 4.1 Samuel Huntington....................................................................... 27 4.2 Amartya Sen.................................................................................. 28 4.3 Seyla Benhabib.............................................................................. 28 Chapter 5: Research Question 2 – Topics such as assimilation vs multiculturalism, American exceptionalism vs universalism, and immigration?................................ 30 5.1 Samuel Huntington....................................................................... 30 5.2 Seyla Benhabib............................................................................. 31 5.3 Amartya Sen................................................................................. 31 Chapter 6: Research Question 3 – What are future strategies for interaction between peoples of different ethnic and cultural identities?.................................................. 33 6.1 Seyla Benhabib............................................................................. 33 6.2 Amartya Sen................................................................................ 34 6.3 Samuel Huntington.................................................................... 35 !3 Republican and Democrat Pundits on the topic of Ethnic and Cultural Identity Part III: The Debate............................................................................................ 36 Chapter 7: Introducing the Pundits..................................................................... 36 7.1 Pat Buchanan............................................................................ 36 7.2 Michael Medved....................................................................... 37 7.3 Juan Williams............................................................................ 37 7.4 Ed Schultz.................................................................................. 37 7.5 Limitations................................................................................. 38 Chapter 8: Research Question 1 – According to the pundits, to what degree are people’s different ethnic and cultural identity a contributing cause of conflict?.................................................................................................................. 39 8.1 According to Republican Pundits............................................... 39 8.1.1 Patrick buchanan................................................... 39 8.1.1 Michael Medved................................................... 40 8.2 According to Democrat Pundits.................................................. 42 8.2.1 Juan Williams........................................................ 42 8.2.2 Ed Schultz.............................................................. 43 Chapter 9: Research Question 2 – Where do the pundits stand on topics such as assimilation vs multiculturalism, American exceptionalism vs universalism, and immigration?............................................................................................................ 44 9.1 According to republican Pundits................................................... 44 9.1.1 Patrick Buchanan..................................................... 44 9.1.2 Michael Medved...................................................... 45 9.2 According to Democrat Pundits.................................................... 47 9.2.1 Juan Williams.......................................................... 47 9.2.2 Ed Schultz............................................................... 48 Chapter 10: Research Question 3 – According to the pundits, what are future strategies for interaction between peoples of different ethnic and cultural identities?............................................................................................................ 49 10.1 According to Republican Pundits................................................. 49 10.1.1 Patrick Buchanan.................................................... 49 10.1.2 Michael Medved..................................................... 50 10.2 According to Democrat Pundits.................................................... 52 10.2.1 Juan Williams.......................................................... 52 !4 Republican and Democrat Pundits on the topic of Ethnic and Cultural Identity 10.2.2 Ed Schultz............................................................... 52 Part IV: Analysis................................................................................................... 54 Chapter 11: Quantitative Analysis......................................................................... 54 Chapter 12: Research Question 1 – According to the pundits, to what degree are people’s different ethnic and cultural identity a contributing cause of conflict?.................................................................................................................. 56 12.1 Comparison of Republican and Democrat pundits..................... 56 12.2 Republican pundits.................................................................... 56 12.3 Democrat pundits..................................................................... 57 12.4 Personal reflections..................................................................... 58 Chapter 13: Research Question 2 – Where do the pundits stand on topics such as assimilation vs multiculturalism, American exceptionalism vs universalism, and immigration?............................................................................................................ 59 13.1 Comparison of Republican and Democrat pundits..................... 59 13.2 Republican pundits.................................................................... 59 13.3 Democrat pundits..................................................................... 60 13.4 Personal reflections..................................................................... 61 Chapter 14: Research Question 3 – According to the pundits, what are future strategies for interaction between peoples of different ethnic and cultural identities?............................................................................................................ 62 14.1 Comparison of Republican and Democrat pundits..................... 62 14.2 Republican pundits...................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Firemen Reflect on Accord -Maoannb PULLOUT Gcction Mood Inside Buckland Station Is Gloomy
    m If79. HlOfI Mmln0. M l f m . ' LiMaron, 4 ofuomoffe, ». v«ryef«OA. 6 4M W «v- r wMkCfuM. 7f, ^ » w « r brok*^ ofr, •Mtta. Em«f- Wofl. M7-0M7 P. TifSildrinsr) lin M tp o m r broKM. 31k. ndlffon. 646- iHmtrbrfitrr Hrralb ) Vnrhfistfir A C'ty nf VilUqp ^,h.^rr^^ m . 6ootf . Mutt MU. M7-1130. » T X t . LtOttMTlnf*- :k finftb/ lodr 12,m . Dtllofi Saturday, Juna 2 7 ,19 2 7 SOCama 2145. ;ronk-u0 t«nt xetlltnt com M pt 3. Fur* )v«, orxJ led ln« 32400 or ROSS VERDICT: DEATH . Call aftor 6. ■y Linde ftoweff the Assoefeted Fress Inside: MLE BRIDOEFORT - MiciMel B. R«m , eonffeted/ons Sof merder- inG four t«en*sfs fM s, on rridsy Evcryona thouGht tho beesino die flrtt person con­ knock on tho Jury room door demned to (Be in Comiectlciit's at 6:66 p.m. Fridi^ Just moant eleetrle eheir since the U.S. tho Jurors wanted to go homo dupreme Cotm upheld the death and rosumo doliboratlona penalty In 1373. next weak. But it didn't ntoan Lawyers for the 27*year*old that — It moant tho Jury had serial killer said they would doekfod that Miohaol B. Rosa appeal the sentence. should bo oontoneod to daath In tho olootrlo chair. The Cornell University Gradu­ ate and former Insurance sales­ Ity man from Orlswold heard the verdict from a 12-memtier Jury A Jury's vordict Friday that that deliberated four hours before Miehaol B. Ro m should Go to ifiMdaisM, concludinG the killinGs were tho oloctrlo chair for tho mnm "espedally cruel, heinous and murders of four younG women CE depraved." evoked praise for tho Jurors' ThoM are the aGGravatinG couraGe, cntlclsm of Connec­ factors necessary for the death ticut's death penalty statute sentence to be Imposed under and predictions Ross will Connecticut law.
    [Show full text]
  • Jay-Richards-Longer
    Jay W. Richards, Ph.D., is author of many books including the New York Times bestsellers Infiltrated (2013) and Indivisible (2012). He is also the author of Money, Greed, and God, winner of a 2010 Templeton Enterprise Award; and co-author of The Privileged Planet with astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez. Richards is an Assistant Research Professor in the School of Business and Economics at The Catholic University of America and a Senior Fellow at the Discovery Institute. In recent years he has been Distinguished Fellow at the Institute for Faith, Work & Economics, Contributing Editor of The American at the American Enterprise Institute, a Visiting Fellow at the Heritage Foundation, and Research Fellow and Director of Acton Media at the Acton Institute. Richards’ articles and essays have been published in The Harvard Business Review, Wall Street Journal, Barron’s, Washington Post, Forbes, The Daily Caller, Investor’s Business Daily, Washington Times, The Philadelphia Inquirer, The Huffington Post, The American Spectator, The Daily Caller, The Seattle Post- Intelligencer, and a wide variety of other publications. He is a regular contributor to National Review Online, Christian Research Journal, and The Imaginative Conservative. His topics range from culture, economics, and public policy to natural science, technology, and the environment. He is also creator and executive producer of several documentaries, including three that appeared widely on PBS—The Call of the Entrepreneur, The Birth of Freedom, and The Privileged Planet. Richards’ work has been covered in The New York Times (front page news, science news, and editorial), The Washington Post (news and editorial), The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Times, Nature, Science, Astronomy, Physics Today, Reuters, The Chronicle of Higher Education, American Enterprise, Congressional Quarterly Researcher, World, National Catholic Register, and American Spectator.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Annual Report
    SEATTLE CHANNEL 2009 Annual Report In 2009, SEATTLE CHANNEL continued to provide top-flight service to Seattle residents by cablecasting and webcasting a variety of programming that informs and inspires its viewers. SEATTLE CHANNEL features comprehensive gavel-to-gavel coverage of the City of Seattle government; educational and dynamic public affairs; and inspirational community and arts programming. In addition, SEATTLE CHANNEL produces an innovative and sophisticated website. Moreover, all of this quality content is produced by a modest-sized staff operating with a lean budget. Highlights of the last year include: • SEATTLE CHANNEL won 28 awards in the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors’ (NATOA) Government Programming Awards including, for the third year in a row, first place for a Government Access Station Web Site. • In the last year, SEATTLE CHANNEL continued its commitment to the most thorough coverage of Seattle’s local government of any television outlet. • SEATTLE CHANNEL’s website received 5.6 million visits last year, with around 500,000 visitors streaming or downloading videos. • By working out distribution agreements, SEATTLE CHANNEL began showing some of its programs, including Book Lust, Art Zone and American Podium, on Federal Way TV and Burien TV. • SEATTLE CHANNEL added its own blog—Take21—to its website features. • Since the beginning of 2009, SEATTLE CHANNEL has been featured in 65 media outlets from small blogs to major websites and newspapers including The Seattle Times, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Puget Sound Business Journal, Crosscut, Seattle Post Globe, Publicola and many others. • SEATTLE CHANNEL partnered with CityClub and Town Hall to host a 90-minute, multi-media, interactive live call-in show hosted by C.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Agreement and Disagreement Among Movie Reviewers Alan Agresti & Larry Winner Version of Record First Published: 20 Sep 2012
    This article was downloaded by: [University of Florida] On: 08 October 2012, At: 16:45 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK CHANCE Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ucha20 Evaluating Agreement and Disagreement among Movie Reviewers Alan Agresti & Larry Winner Version of record first published: 20 Sep 2012. To cite this article: Alan Agresti & Larry Winner (1997): Evaluating Agreement and Disagreement among Movie Reviewers, CHANCE, 10:2, 10-14 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09332480.1997.10542015 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with
    [Show full text]
  • American Forces Network Radio Programming Decisions (D-2006-117)
    September 27, 2006 Information Technology Management American Forces Network Radio Programming Decisions (D-2006-117) Department of Defense Office of Inspector General Quality Integrity Accountability Additional Copies To obtain additional copies of this report, visit the Web site of the Department of Defense Inspector General at http://www.dodig.mil/audit/reports or contact the Secondary Reports Distribution Unit at (703) 604-8937 (DSN 664-8937) or fax (703) 604-8932. Suggestions for Future Audits To suggest ideas for or to request future audits, contact the Office of the Deputy Inspector General for Auditing at (703) 604-8940 (DSN 664-8940) or fax (703) 604-8932. Ideas and requests can also be mailed to: ODIG-AUD (ATTN: Audit Suggestions) Department of Defense Inspector General 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801) Arlington, VA 22202-4704 Acronyms AFIS American Forces Information Service AFN American Forces Network AFRTS American Forces Radio and Television Service AFN-BC American Forces Network - Broadcast Center ASD(PA) Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs) OIG Office of Inspector General Department of Defense Office of Inspector General Report No. D-2006-117 September 27, 2006 (Project No. D2006-D000FI-0103.000) American Forces Network Radio Programming Decisions Executive Summary Who Should Read This Report and Why? This report will be of interest to DoD personnel responsible for the selection and distribution of talk-radio programming to overseas U.S. Forces and their family members and military personnel serving onboard ships. The report discusses the controls and processes needed for establishing a diverse inventory of talk-radio programming on American Forces Network Radio.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy
    Mount Rushmore: The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy Brian Asher Rosenwald Wynnewood, PA Master of Arts, University of Virginia, 2009 Bachelor of Arts, University of Pennsylvania, 2006 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia August, 2015 !1 © Copyright 2015 by Brian Asher Rosenwald All Rights Reserved August 2015 !2 Acknowledgements I am deeply indebted to the many people without whom this project would not have been possible. First, a huge thank you to the more than two hundred and twenty five people from the radio and political worlds who graciously took time from their busy schedules to answer my questions. Some of them put up with repeated follow ups and nagging emails as I tried to develop an understanding of the business and its political implications. They allowed me to keep most things on the record, and provided me with an understanding that simply would not have been possible without their participation. When I began this project, I never imagined that I would interview anywhere near this many people, but now, almost five years later, I cannot imagine the project without the information gleaned from these invaluable interviews. I have been fortunate enough to receive fellowships from the Fox Leadership Program at the University of Pennsylvania and the Corcoran Department of History at the University of Virginia, which made it far easier to complete this dissertation. I am grateful to be a part of the Fox family, both because of the great work that the program does, but also because of the terrific people who work at Fox.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Meddling in Western Elections, 2016-2017: a Preliminary
    RUSSIAN MEDDLING IN WESTERN ELECTIONS, 2016-2017: A PRELIMINARY PROBE By Guillermo Lopez Sanchez A thesis submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts with a Major in International Studies May 2018 Committee Members: Dennis J. Dunn, Chair Ronald Angelo Johnson Sandhya Rao COPYRIGHT by Guillermo Lopez Sanchez 2018 FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, Guillermo Lopez Sanchez, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I express my gratitude to Dr. Dennis J. Dunn, Professor of History and Director of the Center for International Studies at Texas State University. His dedication, knowledge, and support since I began the Master of Arts with a major in International Studies were invaluable. In addition, my appreciation is extended to Dr. Ronald Angelo Johnson, Associate Professor in the Department of History; and Dr. Sandhya Rao, Professor in the Department of Mass Communication, for their outstanding advice and assistance. Collectively, they strengthened my resources, asked probing questions that helped me sharpen my focus, and provided valuable insights that benefitted my research. I also wish to express my appreciation to Jeremy Pena, Coordinator of Academic Programs at the Center for International Studies, for his administrative support.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Federal STEM Education Programs
    Invisible: 1.4 Percent Coverage for Education is Not Enough Darrell M. West, Grover J. “Russ” Whitehurst, and E.J. Dionne Jr. Methodology • Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism - Coded content daily from a sample of newspapers, network news, cable news, news and talk radio, and online news - Samples are purposeful rather than representative - Selection bias for important stories • Brookings: coded content of all AP education wire stories • Brookings: qualitative study of blogs and local newspapers Newspapers Online Network TV Cable Radio Yahoo news ABC Good CNN daytime NPR Morning Edition NY Times Morning America MSNBC.com ABC World News Situation Room Rush Limbaugh Washington Post Tonight Wall Street Journal NYTimes.com NBC Today Show Anderson Cooper 360 Ed Schultz USA Today Google news NBC Nightly News Lou Dobbs Randi Rhodes washingtonpost.com CBS The Early CNN Prime Time Michael Savage LA Times Show cnn.com CBS Evening MSNBC daytime Sean Hannity Kansas City Star News Pittsburgh Post- aol news PBS Newshour Hardball ABC News Gazette Headlines San Antonio foxnews.com Rachel Maddow CBS News Express-News Headlines San Jose Mercury USAtoday.com The Ed Show News Herald News abcnews.com Countdown Anniston Star BBC News Fox News special Spokesman-Review Reuters.com Fox News daytime Meadville Tribune O'Reilly Factor Fox Report with Shepard Smith Hannity (TV) Special Report w/ Bret Baier Government National News Coverage 2009 Economics Foreign (non-U.S.) U.S. Foreign affairs 12 Health/Medicine Business Crime 10 Campaign/Elections/Politics
    [Show full text]
  • Million Dollar Baby (Spoiler Warning!)
    University of Central Florida STARS On Sport and Society Public History 2-14-2005 Million Dollar Baby (spoiler warning!) Richard C. Crepeau University of Central Florida, [email protected] Part of the Cultural History Commons, Journalism Studies Commons, Other History Commons, Sports Management Commons, and the Sports Studies Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/onsportandsociety University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Commentary is brought to you for free and open access by the Public History at STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in On Sport and Society by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Crepeau, Richard C., "Million Dollar Baby (spoiler warning!)" (2005). On Sport and Society. 703. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/onsportandsociety/703 SPORT AND SOCIETY FOR H-ARETE Million Dollar Baby (spoiler warning!) FEBRUARY 14, 2005 I will start today with a warning, something that perhaps I should do more often. The subject today is the film "Million Dollar Baby." If you have not seen the film and intend to see it you may want to stop reading now. Reading this will reveal things you don't want to know before you see the film. Over the past few weeks "Million Dollar Baby" has become a target of the ultraconservative media types like Rush Limbaugh, Michael Medved, and an assortment of those non-spinners who pile-on at FOX. Once the film picked up a bundle of Oscar Nominations the outcry quickened. If you think this is a film promoting assisted suicide or some other liberal agenda, then you did not see the same film as I did.
    [Show full text]
  • Uld Take All Callers, Independent Facts Radio Talk. Mike Malloy, Articulate
    uld take all callers, independent facts radio talk. Mike Malloy, articulate historian, (unfortunate11 fired for daring to speak the truth about the US Israeli PAC and Israel's bombing of Lebannon), Thorn Hartrnann, articulate historian & writer, Randi Rhodes, who took on CACl &won, Sam Sedar, who articulates what 36 of 171 ike dwards 43212 Clear Channel now will provide two more hateful commentators in Laura lngraham and despicable Michael Savage who calls Jimmy Carter an Anti Semite (the man who won the nobel peace prize). I will boycon Clear Channel and buy a satellite radio because they seem to want to have a One Sided radio station. I hope people realize how hateful those two people are that they are putting on there. TO READ MORE OF THERE HATEFUL COMMENTS GO TO MEDIAMAmERS.ORG iurie ewey 45387 We need progressive voices on the airwaves to keep our democracy. I need 1230 on in the morninq drive to keep my sanity. ieresa lhitnev 43074 Keep this important proqramming on the air!!!! .a. lhnson 43201 ike we eahy 43235 America's Last Non-desperate Housewife just got desperate! The last thing Columbus needs to subjected to is the insane rantings of Michael Savage (nee Weiner)! Keep Stephanie, AI and Biq Eddie on the air in Columbubs! ark utkus 43215 We are encouraginq as many people as possible to siqn this petition. my well 43212 it's not that clear channel "cannot sell" progressive radio... they just aren't trying. the hosts they are eliminating are some of the only truthful, level- headed and/or loqical people on the air.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking the Spin Cycle: Teaching Complexity in the 19.3
    Lane Glisson 461 Breaking the Spin Cycle: Teaching Complexity in the 19.3. Age of Fake News portal Lane Glisson publication, abstract: This article describes a discussion-based approach for teaching college students to identify the characteristics of ethical journalism and scholarly writing, by comparingfor fake news with credible information in a strategically planned slideshow. Much has been written on the need to instruct our students about disinformation. This librarian shares a lesson plan that engages students’ critical thinking skills by using a blend of humor, analysis, and a compelling visual presentation. The teaching method is contextualized by research on the distrust of the press and scientific evidence since the rise of hyper-partisan cable news, Russian trollaccepted farms, and alternative facts. and Introduction edited, Throughout our culture, the old notions of “truth” and “knowledge” are in danger of being replaced by the new ones of “opinion,” “perception” and “credibility.” copy Michio Kakutani1 What if truth is not an absolute or a relative, but a skill—a muscle, like memory, that collectively we have neglected so much that we have grown measurably weaker at using it? How might we rebuild it, going from chronic to bionic? reviewed, Kevin Young2 npeer 2015, I knew I had a problem. After several years of teaching library instruction is classes, I noticed that my conception of factual- ity and that of my students had diverged. Most Most students preferred Istudents preferred Google and YouTube to do their mss. Google and YouTube to do research. When asked in my classes how they dis- cerned the credibility of a website, most shrugged their research.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution– and Devolution–
    JULY 1999 Volume 28, Number 7 IMPRIMISBecause Ideas Have Consequences 27th The Evolution– year and Devolution– of Journalistic Ethics Marianne Jennings 845,000 subscribers Professor of Legal and Ethical Studies Arizona State University Journalists are the eyes and ears of society. arianne Jennings is an They gather, sift, and communicate millions of M award-winning newspaper pieces of information. But as Marianne columnist and radio commenta- Jennings warns, some journalists believe that tor, director of the Joan and the facts are less important than a story that David Lincoln Center for Applied “sells” or that promotes a cause. Ethics, and professor of legal Professor Jennings delivered her remarks at and ethical stud- the February 1999 Center for Constructive ies at Arizona State Alternatives seminar, “The Fourth Estate: A University. With undergrad- History of Journalism,” which was co-hosted by uate and law de- Hillsdale’s newly established Herbert H. Dow II grees from Brig- Program in American Journalism. ham Young Univer- sity, Dr. Jennings lawyer by training and a newspaper col- has written six text- umnist by avocation, I teach ethics at a books, and more business school. People tell me that’s than 130 articles. four oxymorons in one sentence. Her column in the AMy unusual career choices have made me Arizona Republic realize that lawyers, businessmen, and journal- has been reprinted ists wrestle with the same ethical concerns. But by the Wall Street Journal, the Chicago Tribune, and other news- journalists face the greatest challenge. They not papers nationwide. A collection of only have to decide whether to follow a code of her essays, Nobody Fixes Real ethics personally but also whether that code Carrot Sticks Anymore, was pub- should apply to the stories and the subjects they lished in 1994.
    [Show full text]