DOCSLIB.ORG

2007 Report on the Water Quality of Minnesota Streams Citizen Stream-Monitoring Program Environmental Analysis and Outcomes Division October 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2007 Report on the Water Quality of Minnesota Streams Citizen Stream-Monitoring Program Environmental Analysis and Outcomes Division October 2008 2007 Report on the Water Quality of Minnesota Streams Citizen Stream-Monitoring Program Environmental Analysis and Outcomes Division October 2008 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 http://www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 or 800-657-3864 toll free TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 toll free The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency thanks the 2007 Citizen Stream-Monitoring Program volunteers for their efforts in collecting water-quality data. Their commitment and dedication to stream monitoring and protection are greatly appreciated. Special thanks to the following people for their contributions to this report: Author and Manuscript Reviewers Johanna Schussler Laurie Sovell Cover Photo John Feneis (Mustinka River) Data Entry Andrea Ebner Nancy Flandrick Jean Garvin Shane Hanly Miranda Nichols Lynda Nelson Johanna Schussler Sandra Simbeck Laurie Sovell wq-csm2-07 The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs by using the Internet to distribute reports and information to a wider audience. For additional information, see the Web site: http://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/csmp.html Table of Contents List of Figures........................................................................................................................2 List of Tables .........................................................................................................................2 Introduction............................................................................................................................3 Ecoregions and Stream Water Quality...................................................................................4 Section 1. How CSMP Volunteers Collect and Use Data .....................................................5 What CSMP Volunteers Measure....................................................................................5 Putting CSMP Data to Work............................................................................................9 Section 2. Summary of 2007 CSMP Data .............................................................................10 Stream Monitoring Results ..............................................................................................10 Rainfall Monitoring Results.............................................................................................13 Bibliography ..........................................................................................................................17 Useful Definitions..................................................................................................................18 Appendix 1. Minnesota Drainage Basins & Major Watersheds Map and Key..........................................19 Appendix 2. Summary of 2007 CSMP Data Collected with 60-cm Transparency Tube...........................23 Appendix 3. Summary of 2007 CSMP Data Collected with 100-cm Transparency Tube.........................66 2007 Report on the Water Quality of Minnesota Streams • October 2008 • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 1 List of Figures Figure 1. Increase in CSMP Volunteers and Sites, 1998 – 2007...........................................4 Figure 2. Minnesota’s Seven Ecoregions. Mapped by U.S. EPA..........................................4 Figure 3. Range of Stream Transparency and Water Quality................................................6 Figure 4. CSMP Rain Gauge .................................................................................................8 Figure 5. CSMP Stream Stage Estimate ................................................................................8 Figure 6. Number of 2007 CSMP Sites in Each Major Drainage Basin ...............................11 Figure 7. Map of 2007 Average Transparency Readings ......................................................12 Figure 8. Percentage of CSMP Sites across 5 Categories of Average Transparency............13 Figure 9a. 2007 Water Year Precipitation Map.....................................................................15 Figure 9b. 2007 Departure from Normal Precipitation Map .................................................16 List of Tables Table 1. Interquartile Range of Concentrations for Least-Impacted Streams .......................5 2007 Report on the Water Quality of Minnesota Streams • October 2008 • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 2 Introduction The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s possible to track the effects of (MPCA) Citizen Stream-Monitoring rainfall runoff on their stream. At the Program (CSMP) began in 1998. The CSMP end of each monitoring season, was designed to give individuals across volunteers submit their data to the Minnesota an opportunity for involvement MPCA. An annual report in a simple yet meaningful stream- summarizes data collected by monitoring program that provides data volunteers statewide and is posted on management and interpretation. 2007 the MPCA Web site. Volunteers also marked the CSMP’s tenth season with 490 receive individual reports specific to volunteers submitting data collected from their stream monitoring sites. 831 different sites across the state. The This report summarizes data collected by CSMP grew again in 2007, with 4 more CSMP volunteers during 2007. The first volunteers and 38 more sites than the section describes what CSMP volunteers do previous year (Figure 1). Of the 490 and gives examples of how participants use volunteers in the program, 81 turned in data CSMP data. Section 2 presents a summary for the first time in 2007. of volunteer data from the 2007 monitoring The CSMP uses a collaborative season. The Appendices contain data approach to stream monitoring by summaries for each site monitored. partnering with citizen volunteers who live on or near a stream, and who are interested in water quality. Any person or group willing to devote a small amount of time and energy on a regular basis can CSMP Goals: participate in the CSMP. Volunteers receive a transparency tube, rain gauge, data sheets, and instructions 6 Collect valuable water-quality for taking measurements. Once data by expanding statewide enrolled, participants visit an stream-monitoring established spot on a nearby stream once per week from April to 6 Provide a basic program for September to measure Stream anyone interested in stream Transparency, Water Level (Stage), monitoring Appearance and Recreational Suitability. In addition to weekly 6 Complement existing citizen efforts stream measurements, rainfall is recorded daily. Volunteers are also 6 Facilitate awareness of water-quality encouraged to monitor immediately issues & promote shared goals after large rainfall events whenever 2007 Report on the Water Quality of Minnesota Streams • October 2008 • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 3 Figure 1. Increase in CSMP quality for a region, were sampled by the Volunteers and Sites, 1998 – 2007 MPCA to characterize stream conditions for each ecoregion (McCollor and Heiskary 900 1993). The results provide a baseline with 800 which to compare streams. In other words, 700 the least-impacted streams are the yardsticks 600 500 by which we measure other streams. Table 1 400 lists the typical total phosphorus, total 300 suspended solids, and turbidity values for 200 least-impacted streams in six ecoregions. 100 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Figure 2. Minnesota’s Seven Number of Volunteers Number of Sites Ecoregions. Mapped by U.S. EPA N or th e rn Ecoregions and Stream Water Mi n n es o ta W etlands Quality The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has divided the continental United States into ecoregions based on soils, geomorphology, land use and potential Red River natural vegetation. In Minnesota, this results Valley in seven fairly distinct ecoregions (Figure Northern Lakes 2). The Northern Lakes and Forests and Forests ecoregion (NLF) is predominately forested, N o r t h Central has numerous lakes and is located in the Ha r d wood Forests northeastern part of Minnesota. The Western Corn Belt Plains ecoregion (WCBP), located Northern in the southern third of Minnesota, has Glaciated Plains rolling terrain and is extensively cultivated Driftless for row crop farming. The ecoregion Area framework provides a good basis for evaluating differences and similarities in Minnesota's streams. Western Corn B e lt P la i n s “Least-impacted” streams, which are felt to be representative and reflect, expected water 2007 Report on the Water Quality of Minnesota Streams • October 2008 • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 4 Table 1. Interquartile Range of Concentrations for Least-Impacted Streams in Minnesota by Ecoregion.1 Distributions of annual data from 1970-1992 (McCollor and Heiskary, 1993; note 1 mg/L = 1 ppm = 1,000 ppb) Total Phosphorus Total Suspended Solids Turbidity (mg/L) (mg/L) (NTU) Region/ 25% 50% 75% 25% 50% 75% 25% 50% 75% Percentile NLF 0.02 0.04 0.05 1.8 3.3 6.0 1.7 2.5 4.3 NMW 0.04 0.06 0.09 4.8 8.6 16.0 4.1 6.0 10.0 NCHF 0.06 0.09 0.15 4.8 8.8 16.0 3.0 5.1 8.5 NGP 0.09 0.16 0.25 11.0 34.0 63.0 5.6 15.0 23.5 RRV 0.11 0.19 0.30 11.0 28.0 59.0 6.0 12.0 23.0 WCBP 0.16 0.24 0.33 10.0 27.0 61.0 5.2 12.0 22.0 Section 1. How CSMP Volunteers Collect and Use Data What CSMP Volunteers Measure Stream Water Transparency Stream transparency is an indirect measure Tracking water transparency is like of the amount of dissolved and suspended monitoring your blood pressure because it materials present in water. For most bodies tells us about the health of a stream. of water, the amount of solids suspended
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Physical Characteristics of Stream Subbasins in The
    PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF STREAM SUBBASINS IN THE SANOCKI PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF STREAM RIVER,SUBBASINS THE UPPER IN CEDAR RIVER, UPPER WAPSIPINICON ROCK SHELL ANDRIVER, UPPER WAPSIPINICON RIVER, UPPER CEDAR RIVER, SHELL ROCK OFR 99-471 RIVER, AND WINNEBAGO RIVER BASINS, SOUTHERN MINNESOTA AND NORTHERN IOWA MINNESOTA SOUTHEASTERN BASINS, RIVER, WINNEBAGO By Christopher A. Sanocki Open-File Report 99-471 Prepared in cooperation with the Minnesota Department of Transportation 99-471 OFR Mounds View, Minnesota 2000 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 3K\VLFDO &KDUDFWHULVWLFV RI 6WUHDP 6XEEDVLQV LQ WKH 8SSHU :DSVLSLQLFRQ 5LYHU 8SSHU &HGDU 5LYHU 6KHOO 5RFN 5LYHU DQG :LQQHEDJR 5LYHU %DVLQV 6RXWKHUQ 0LQQHVRWD DQG 1RUWKHUQ ,RZD %\ &KULVWRSKHU $ 6DQRFNL $EVWUDFW Data that describe the physical characteristics of stream subbasins upstream from selected sites on streams in the Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper Cedar River, Shell Rock River, and Winnebago River Basins, located in southern Minnesota and northern Iowa are presented in this report. The physical characteristics are the drainage area of the subbasin, the percentage area of the subbasin covered only by lakes, the percentage area of the subbasin covered by both lakes and marsh, the main-channel length, and the main-channel slope. Stream sites include outlets of subbasins of at least 5 square miles, and locations of U.S. Geological Survey high-flow, and continuous-record gaging stations. ,QWURGXFWLRQ Selected data for sites on streams at outlets of subbasins larger than about 5 square miles; at This is the 16th report in a series detailing locations of U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) high- subbasin characteristics of streams in Minnesota flow, and continuous-record gaging stations and adjacent states.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Summaries of Selected Iowa Streamflow Data--Table 1
    Table 1 1 Table 1. Streamgages in Iowa included in this study. [no., number] Map Streamgage number Streamgage name Link to streamflow statistics for streamgage number (fig. 1) 1 05387440 Upper Iowa River at Bluffton, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05387440_stats.docx 2 05387500 Upper Iowa River at Decorah, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05387500_stats.docx 3 05388000 Upper Iowa River near Decorah, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05388000_stats.docx 4 05388250 Upper Iowa River near Dorchester, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05388250_stats.docx 5 05388500 Paint Creek at Waterville, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05388500_stats.docx 6 05389000 Yellow River near Ion, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05389000_stats.docx 7 05389400 Bloody Run Creek near Marquette, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05389400_stats.docx 8 05389500 Mississippi River at McGregor, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05389500_stats.docx 9 05411400 Sny Magill Creek near Clayton, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05411400_stats.docx 10 05411600 Turkey River at Spillville, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05411600_stats.docx 11 05411850 Turkey River near Eldorado, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05411850_stats.docx 12 05412000 Turkey River at Elkader, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05412000_stats.docx 13 05412020 Turkey River above French Hollow Creek at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05412020_stats.docx
    [Show full text]
  • Delineation Percentage
    Lake Superior - North Rainy River - Headwaters Lake Superior - South Vermilion River Nemadji River Cloquet River Pine River Rainy River - Rainy Lake Little Fork River Mississippi River - Headwaters Leech Lake River Upper St. Croix River Root River Big Fork River Mississippi River - Winona Upper/Lower Red Lake Kettle River Mississippi River - Lake Pepin Mississippi River - Grand Rapids Mississippi River - La Crescent Crow Wing River Otter Tail River Mississippi River - Reno Mississippi River - Brainerd Zumbro River Redeye River Upper Big Sioux River Mississippi River - Twin Cities Snake River Des Moines River - Headwaters St. Louis River Rum River Lower Big Sioux River Lower St. Croix River Cottonwood River Minnesota River - Headwaters Cannon River Mississippi River - St. Cloud Long Prairie River Lake of the Woods Lower Rainy North Fork Crow River Mississippi River - Sartell Lac Qui Parle River Buffalo River Wild Rice River Minnesota River - Mankato Sauk River Rock River Redwood River Snake River Chippewa River Watonwan River Clearwater River East Fork Des Moines River Red River of the North - Sandhill River Upper Red River of the North Blue Earth River Red River of the North - Marsh River Roseau River Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River Le Sueur River Little Sioux River Bois de Sioux River Cedar River Lower Minnesota River Pomme de Terre River Red Lake River Lower Des Moines River Upper Iowa River Red River of the North - Tamarac River Shell Rock River Two Rivers Rapid River Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek Mustinka River South Fork Crow River Thief River Winnebago River Upper Wapsipinicon River 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% %Altered %Natural %Impounded %No Definable Channel wq-bsm1-06.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Wapsipinicon River Watershed WRAPS Report (Wq-Ws4-67A)
    Watershed February 2020 Upper Wapsipinicon River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy Report Authors and Contributors Emily Zanon, MPCA Ashley Ignatius, MPCA Bill Thompson, MPCA Justin Watkins, MPCA Joe Magee, MPCA Jason Carlson, DNR Jennifer Ronnenberg, MDH Angie Knish, Mower Co. James Fett, Mower Co. SWCD Justin Hanson, Mower Co. SWCD Antonio Arenas Amado, Iowa Flood Center/IIHR Cover photo credit: Joe Magee The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs by using the Internet to distribute reports and information to wider audience. Visit our website for more information. The MPCA reports are printed on 100% post-consumer recycled content paper manufactured without chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Document number: wq-ws4-67a Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................. 3 List of tables............................................................................................................................................ 3 List of figures .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Key terms and abbreviations .................................................................................................................. 5 Executive summary ................................................................................................................................. 6 What is the WRAPS Report? ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa Chapter Report March 27, 2018 Greg Gelwicks Iowa DNR Fisheries Research
    Iowa Chapter Report March 27, 2018 Greg Gelwicks Iowa DNR Fisheries Research Dam Mitigation and Rivers Program Contact: Nate Hoogeveen, (515) 281-3134, nate.hoogeveen@dnr.iowa.gov Links: http://www.iowadnr.gov/Things-to-Do/Canoeing-Kayaking/Dam-Mitigation-Projects Willow Creek The third of three dams on Willow at East Park in Mason City was improved for fish passage in January 2018. The third dam was a removal. Two other dams near where this tributary's mouth at the Winnebago River were modified in January of 2017. One was removed and replaced with a low-cross vane structure. The other was converted to a rock arch rapids. Quaker Mill Dam, Maquoketa River The Quaker Mill Dam north of Manchester on the Maquoketa River was removed in the fall of 2017 as a phase 1 project. A starter channel was meandered through the former lakebed and seeded down for one year of growth prior to reconnecting it to flowing water. 2018 Dam Mitigation Projects * Phase 2 of the Quaker Mill Dam project * Ames River Valley Park Dam conversion to whitewater facility/fish passage channel * A mitigation bank is being reviewed for USACE approval based on the removal of two dams in Fort Dodge on the Des Moines River, which may be either the first stream mitigation bank in Iowa. Setting up mitigation banks in Iowa is now possible due to work Iowa DNR led to develop a method of evaluating credits to measure adverse and beneficial effects of different project type to allow credit trading. This would open fish passage to the entire East Fork Des Moines River, and the West Fork Des Moines River upstream to the Reasoner Dam in Humboldt.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Report on the Water Quality of Minnesota Streams
    Citizen Stream-Monitoring Program 2004 Report on the Water Quality Of Minnesota Streams Environmental Analysis & Outcomes Division May 2005 TTY (for hearing and speech impaired only): (651) 282-5332 Printed on recycled paper containing at least 20% fibers from paper recycled by consumers Pam Skon prepared this report. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency thanks the 2004 Citizen Stream-Monitoring Program volunteers for their efforts in collecting water-quality data. Their commitment and dedication to stream monitoring and protection are greatly appreciated. Special thanks to the following people for their contributions to this report: Manuscript Review: Laurie Sovell Doug Hall Data Entry: Andrea Ebner Jan Eckart Jean Garvin Jennifer Holstad Joanne Singsaas Pam Skon Cover Photo: Mike Nordin Cover Design: Peggy Hicks On the Cover: Photograph by CSMP volunteer Mike Nordin. The photo was taken looking upstream from his monitoring location on the Sucker River in September 2004. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………………2 List of Tables…………………………………………………………………………………… 2 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………... 3 Ecoregions and Stream Water Quality………………………………………………………….. 4 Section 1. How CSMP Volunteers Collect and Use Data………………………………………. 5 What CSMP Volunteers Measure……………………………………………………………... 5 Putting CSMP Data to Work………………………………………………………………….. 8 Section 2. Summary of 2004 CSMP Data ………………………………………………………9 Stream Monitoring Results……………………………………………………………………. 9 Rainfall Monitoring Results……………………………………………………………………14 Section 3. 2003 Volunteer Survey Results…………………………………………………… 17 Section 4. Monitors in Action: Red River Basin River Watch………………………………….19 Useful Definitions ………………………………………………………………………………23 Appendix 1. Minnesota Drainage Basins & Major Watersheds Map and Key………………….24 Appendix 2. Summary of 2004 CSMP Data Collected with 60 cm Transparency Tube………..28 Appendix 3. Summary of 2004 CSMP Data Collected with 100 cm Transparency Tube……...76 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Work Plan
    Attachment A Project Work Plan Doc Type: Contract MPCA Use Only Swift #: 89268 CR #: 8070 Project Title: West Fork Des Moines River Major Watershed Project Phase II 1. Project Summary: Organization: Heron Lake Watershed District (HLWD) Contractor Contact Name: Jan Voit Title: District Administrator E-mail: jan.voit@mysmbs.com Address: PO Box 345 Heron Lake, MN 56137 Phone: 507-793-2462 Fax: 507-822-0921 Subcontractor(s)/Partner(s): Organization: University of Minnesota Extension Project manager: Barb Radke, Leadership and Civic Engagement Address: 863 30th Ave SE Rochester, MN 55904 Phone: 507-995-1631 E-mail: radke008@umn.edu and Project manager: Karen Terry, Watershed Education Program Address: 46352 State Highway 329 Morris, MN 56267 Phone: 320-589-1711 E-mail: kterry@umn.edu MPCA contact(s): MPCA project manager: Katherine Pekarek-Scott Title: Project Manager Address: 1601 East Highway 12, Suite 1 Willmar, MN 56201 Phone: 320-441-6973 Fax: 320-214-3787 E-mail: katherine.pekarek-scott@state.mn.us Project information Latitude/Longitude: 43.556/-94.956 County: Murray, Nobles, Cottonwood, Jackson, Lyon, Pipestone, and Martin Start date: 03/26/2015 End date: 06/30/2018 Total cost: $175,000.00 Full time equivalents: 2.59 www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats e-admin9-38 • 12/2/13 Page 1 of 6 Major watershed(s): Statewide Kettle River Miss Rvr – GrandRpds Rainy Rvr – Baudette So Fork Crow River Big Fork River Lac Qui Parle River Miss Rvr –Headwaters Rainy Rvr – Black Rvr Lower St.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Assessment Rockford Dam Removal on the Shell Rock River, Iowa
    Rockford Dam Removal – Draft Environmental Assessment DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ROCKFORD DAM REMOVAL ON THE SHELL ROCK RIVER, IOWA U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service La Crosse Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office 555 Lester Avenue Onalaska, WI 54650 September 2013 i Rockford Dam Removal – Draft Environmental Assessment Draft Environmental Assessment Rockford Dam Removal on the Shell Rock River, Iowa Executive Summary The La Crosse Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has prepared this assessment of the environmental effects that may result from the proposed removal of Rockford Dam on the Shell Rock River, Floyd County, Iowa. The purpose of the proposed action is to improve fish passage through the Rockford river reach and eliminate the public safety hazard associated with the dam. This action involves removal of the dam, stabilization of the west bank upstream of the dam, lowering of a 250 ft. long berm adjacent to the dam on the west bank, and revegetation of the disturbed areas. The Environmental Assessment provides information to the USFWS Regional Director on the potential effects of the proposed action for development of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). This assessment addresses the need and purpose for the proposed action, identification of alternatives, description of the affected environment, examination of the environmental consequences for each alternative, and the coordination, consultation, and involvement of the public through the process. Efforts to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act are in progress. Rockford Dam was determined to be eligible for the National Historic Register of Places by the Iowa State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) under criterion D, for its potential to provide architectural information.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of March-May 1965 in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
    Floods of March-May 1965 in the Upper Mississippi River Basin GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1850-A Prepared in cooperation with the States of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, and Missouri and with agencies of the Federal Government Floods of March-May 1965 in the Upper Mississippi River Basin By D. B. ANDERSON and I. L. BURMEISTER FLOODS OF 1965 IN THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1850-A Prepared in cooperation with the States of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, and Missouri and with agencies of the Federal Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1970 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERICR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $2.25 (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract. _________________________________________________________ Al Introduction._____________________________________________________ 1 Purpose and scope.________________________________________________ 3 Acknowledgments.________________________________________________ 6 Flood forecasts.___________________________________________________ 6 Meteorological conditions causing floods._____________________________ 7 Conditions previous to March..______ ___________________________ 7 March climatological events.-___--______-_---_-_-_-_____-_-____ 9 April climatological events___________________-_-________________ 13 Thefloods________._______.____.____________________ 15 Mississippi
    [Show full text]
  • Winnebago River and Upper Wapsipinicon River Watersheds Monitoring and Assessment Report
    Watershed health July 2018 Winnebago River and Upper Wapsipinicon River Watersheds Monitoring and Assessment Report Authors The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs by using the Internet to distribute reports and Mel Markert, Joe Hadash, Joel Chirhart, Mark information to wider audience. Visit our Gernes, David Duffey, Mike Walerak, James website for more information. Jahnz, Tiffany Schauls, Justin Watkins, David Christopherson, Bruce Monson, Shawn Nelson MPCA reports are printed on 100% post- consumer recycled content paper Contributors/acknowledgements manufactured without chlorine or chlorine Citizen Stream Monitoring Program Volunteers derivatives. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Department of Agriculture Iowa Department of Natural Resources Project dollars provided by the Clean Water Fund (from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment). Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | 651-296-6300 | 800-657-3864 | Or use your preferred relay service. | Info.pca@state.mn.us This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us. Document number: wq-ws3-07080203b Contents List of acronyms ....................................................................................................................................... v Executive summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Shell Rock River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy
    Watershed May 2021 Shell Rock River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy Report e. Right click on this picture, choose Change picture, click on th pi Authors Bill Thompson; MPCA Ashley Ignatius; MPCA Emily Zanon; MPCA Contributors/acknowledgements Andy Henschel; Shell Rock River Watershed District Brenda Lageson; Freeborn County SWCD Cody Fox; Freeborn County Courtney Phillips; Shell Rock River Watershed District Dalton Syverson; City of Albert Lea Kristen Dieterman; MPCA Lindsey Zeitler; Freeborn County SWCD Paul Brietzke; MPCA Rachel Wehner; Freeborn County Steven Jahnke; City of Albert Lea Winston Beiser; Freeborn County Cover photo descriptions (clockwise, from upper left): Shell Rock River near Gordonsville, Minnesota Agricultural drainage ditch in the Peter Lund Creek Subwatershed Jerad Stricker of the Shell Rock River Watershed District takes a water elevation measurement from the bridge over the channel between Fountain and Albert Lea lakes. City of Albert Lea’s wastewater treatment plant outfall to the Shell Rock River The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs by using the Internet to distribute reports and information to wider audience. Visit our website for more information. The MPCA reports are printed on 100% post-consumer recycled content paper manufactured without chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Document number: wq-ws4-70a Contents List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................ ii List of Figures .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Altered Hydrology
    Altered Hydrology RESPONSE LETTERS WATER PLANS REPORTS PUBLIC COMMENTS Draft issue statement: Priority Specific Resource Category Issue Source Resource Issue Issue? Identified Type 2019 05 29 Shell Rock 1W1P DNR Comments.pdf The lake is impacted by drainage but helps normalize those flows as they leave the lake. A DNR WMA encompasses most of the Yes Halls Lake Concern lakeshore and includes a 10-acre designated old growth hardwood forest. 2019 05 29 Shell Rock 1W1P DNR Comments.pdf Winnebago River Watershed - The Winnebago River is entirely altered in MN. Water storage projects in the upland and Yes Winnebago River Concern increasing floodplain connectivity could benefit channel stability because flows rarely leave the channel. BWSR response to notification Shell Rock Winnebago.docx Altered Hydrology/Flooding/Water Quantity – The hydrologic conditions of the watersheds in this planning area have changed Yes Concern over time. In recent decades more precipitation, more runoff, and more runoff per unit of precipitation has been observed as well as more frequent periods of extremely low flow in some watercourses. These hydrologic changes as well as others have contributed to instability of natural and artificial watercourses, degradation of wetland habitats, loss of agricultural productivity, and increased the risk of flood damages. Recognizing altered hydrology as a priority issue in the plan will help ensure that a driving factor behind many related issues is directly addressed. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Priority Concerns Drainage system management: A comprehensive drainage system management effort is needed to address stream hydrology Concern Letter - 6/19/19 issues for the long-term. This involves drainage networks and systems in both rural and urban areas.
    [Show full text]