Section Two: Your Representation

Tinklers Meadow Green Team Response to the Mid Suffolk Joint Local Plan Consultation

For Official use only:: JOINT LOCAL PLAN CONSULTATION JULY 2019 Date Acknowledged: Reference:

Respondent Name / Organisation: Community Group – Keep Tinklers Meadow Green Team Please be specific what document / part your comment below relates to: Joint Local Plan Preferred Options Document. Section / option / question / site: Please indicate the nature of your comment: (mark ‘x’)

All responses are objections

Please enter your comment below: (Continue on a separate sheet if necessary) 01 Introduction (page 5) 1.1 – We object to the omission of key aspects of the Stowmarket Area Action Plan (SAAP) 2013 which has the weight of an adopted policy until 2027 – the JLP fails to give sufficient attention to the SAAP 2013

1.2, 1.3, 1.4 The opportunity to be involved in this JLP consultation is welcomed, however we object to the consultation process which has been self-limiting and general public responses.

BMSDC have not established an effective process for people to engage with and respond to the consultation process. For example, an executive summary document of the Draft JLP made widely available through town and parish councils would have provided a higher level of support to local groups. Improving awareness and understanding about planning processes, terminology and preferred options. Engagement with the general public is essential to empower people, increase confidence and understanding in order for individuals to feel their response is valued. Otherwise the consultation process is flawed. The style and layout of the online public response form is off putting and cumbersome to use, limiting public engagement

Our response continues below with attached documents to support our response

Background to our community group Tinkers Meadow Green Team As a local community group, we have made a strong, active and positive effort to support this JLP public consultation process. Tinklers Meadow Green Team was established early in 2018 following a speculative development outline planning proposal on land south of Finborough Road (DC/18/01217 followed by DC/18/05570) this land is historically known as Tinklers Meadow (Apportionment Document) field number 255 (1842 Tithe Map). This is a cherished small tract of land outside the settlement boundary, in open countryside, in a flood plain, on best and most versatile agricultural land, adjacent to County Wildlife Sites, at the head of a SAAP designated Special landscape Area and the only undeveloped meadow acting as a ‘green buffer or Strategic gap’ to prevent potential coalescence with the neighbouring village of Onehouse. This site is rated ‘red’ and has been excluded from the Local Plan after several ‘call for site’ submissions due to its poor relationship to services and facilities. Yet it continues to remain vulnerable to speculative development. At the time of the first application BMSDC did not have a secure 5-yr housing supply. The efforts of the local community have been tremendous to save this field at the scenic gateway into Stowmarket from development with 100 objectors to the first application of 56 dwellings and 146 objectors so far to the present application for 4 houses. This site location is protected by clear statements

Tinklers Meadow Green Team Response to the Mid Suffolk Joint Local Plan Consultation and a sound rationale within various sections of the Stowmarket Area Action Plan (SAAP). As MSDC has currently secured a 5+-yr. housing supply this adds a layer of protection. There is a lack of substantive, strong statements within this Draft JLP regarding protecting, preserving and enhancing cherished landscapes, historic settings, green wildlife corridors, river valleys and strategic gaps. This is difficult to understand especially when BMSDC have declared a climate change emergency and feels like ‘the ground remains very shaky beneath our feet’ in terms of a JLP with clarity of purpose fitting for the next decades.

Our group support moving the BMSDC Draft JLP forward towards adoption but the document we are responding to now in our view falls short of our expectations particularly in the JLP areas below.

Key Evidence Documents (page 109) Object – Stowmarket Area Action Plan 2013 is excluded – SAAP is a comprehensive ‘Vision and Objectives’ document effective until 2027 and an adopted planning policy document. Yet several other documents with end dates before 2027 are included such as Dedham Vale AONB & Stour valley Project management Plan 2016-2021

Object – 15.16 We commend the inclusion of The Babergh Green Infrastructure Strategy 2012. We strongly object to the exclusion of the Stowmarket Area Action Plan 2013 from the list of Key Evidence Documents. The SAAP provides robust statements weak or non- existent in the JLP relating to the Stowmarket Area

Object to the BMSDC Open Space Assessment May 2019 definition of ‘Open Space’ which results in the exclusion of natural open spaces as defined in the NPPF paragraph 99 which states: “The designation of land as Local Green Space through local and neighbourhood plans allows communities to identify and protect green areas of particular importance to them.” A new evidence base is required relating to the designation of land within a Local Green Space policy.

Object – to the exclusion of the Suffolk Nature Strategy referred to in LP17 Biodiversity (page 86) 15.16 Suffolk Nature Strategy is referenced with examples of landscape features of principal importance – This document underpins BMSD landscape and nature protection, preservation and enhancement. It is a well written and clear document of specific relevance to the current acknowledged climate change emergency

Object – to the exclusion of the 25 Year Environment Plan – This plan sets out a comprehensive and long- term approach to protecting and enhancing a variety of natural landscapes and habitats for improving the environment. Its goals are simple: cleaner air and water; plants and animals which are thriving; and a greener country for us all.

Object – to the exclusion of The Government’s Clean Growth Strategy – which sets out how we will deliver clean, green growth to combat global warming

Part 1 - Objectives And Strategic Policies 03 Vision and Objectives – Healthy Communities and Infrastructure 3.3 vii. (page 10) 1. Object to the exclusion of a Local Green Space policy and process which is fair and consistent for all communities to seek designation of highly valued Local Green Spaces within the emerging Joint Local Plan subject to meeting the NPPF criteria. This Draft JLP does not give communities an equal opportunity, discriminating against neighbourhoods with no adopted Neighbourhood Development Plan

Tinklers Meadow Green Team Response to the Mid Suffolk Joint Local Plan Consultation

Part 1 - Objectives And Strategic Policies 03 Vision and Objectives – Healthy Communities and Infrastructure 3.3 ix. Vision and Strategy for Stowmarket (page 10) 1. Object to the lack of clarity regarding this statement – what, when, how, who? Will a new taskforce be set up to consider the development of vision and strategy for Stowmarket? Will this build on the SAAP? 2. Object to the lack of ‘joined up policies’ to enable public understanding - How does the statement in 3.3ix. relate to the document Delivering a Vision for Prosperity in Stowmarket (DFP)? This VFP 5- year Action Plan states ‘Stowmarket is the main town and key driver of growth and prosperity in Mid Suffolk, with a large sphere of influence as the major social and economic hub for the district. “We have used the Delivering a Vision for Prosperity (VFP) initiative to seek the views of local people about the future of the town and we have listened to what they have told us. There are many different opinions to consider in mapping out the future of the town and our starting point has been to discuss and understand the views of the local community, so that we can move forward together, on the basis of a consensus about what matters most”. The JLP is unclear about alignment with VFP – Why? Who is involved and impact of VFP on JLP is unclear.

Part 1 - Objectives And Strategic Policies 03 Vision and Objectives – Key Environmental Issues ii. Heritage Assets (page 13) refer also to Part 2 Local Policies LP20 – The Historic Environment Object – JLP omits landscape as a heritage asset in this point.

Part 1 - Objectives And Strategic Policies 11 Infrastructure (page 50-51) Object – JLP Infrastructure is not sufficiently robust in recognition of current difficulties and needs. Stowmarket is a fast-growing community with an infrastructure now not fit for purpose. JLP does not provide reassurance through Policy SP08 Infrastructure provision to enable the increased population to access the services they need now and into the future. Such as access to GP’s, schools, waste facilities. Not enough attention is given to sustainable transport or green infrastructure at an early enough in the planning process. Currently traffic congestion in and around Stowmarket leads to increased levels of pollution with a negative and harmful impact on the BMSDC declared climate change emergency.

Part 1 - Objectives And Strategic Policies 12 Protection And Management of the Environment (page 53-56) Policy SP09 lacks substance – We object to the omission of locally important sites (designated in SAAP) and County Wildlife Sites within this policy

Object to 12.1 -to 12.12. which also lack substance. Given the MSDC declaration of a climate change emergency (July 2019)– not enough attention is given to identify the wide range of issues relating to climate change and how the JLP can effectively address these issues through strategic planning and Development Management Policies. We understand a task group has been set up to consider climate change and green wildlife corridors, but it remains unclear how the task group findings will impact of the next JLP.

Object to 12.4 This point lacks clarity of purpose and intent and undervalues the contribution CWS make to the green infrastructure and climate change agenda. Although this point acknowledges there are local sites of biodiversity and geodiversity value including County Wildlife Sites, priority habitats and species the level of consideration and protection is unclear. For example, ‘how much consideration ‘what value will be afforded to them? Suffolk Biodiversity Information service describes County Wildlife Sites (CWS) as non- statutory sites which are of county and often regional or national importance. The designation recognises the high value of a site for wildlife. The Draft JLP should include greater recognition of the role and contribution of County Wildlife Sites.

Tinklers Meadow Green Team Response to the Mid Suffolk Joint Local Plan Consultation

Part 2 - Local Policies 15 Environment LP17 Biodiversity (page 86 - 88) Object to 15.13. and 15.19 As County Wildlife Sites although mentioned specifically they are omitted from maps. Not enough information is provided in these points and within other JLP sections such as their contribution to BMSD natural capital, green infrastructure, people’s health and wellbeing or climate change

Object to 15.16 and 15.17 The omission in the JLP of Special Landscape Areas and Visually Important Open Spaces as defined within the SAAP is a huge loss in the protection of highly valued features which contribute massively to the intrinsic qualities providing a unique ‘sense of place’ across towns and villages in Mid Suffolk.

We object to the omission the Rattlesden River Valley as a Special Landscape Area. Descriptors in the SAAP provide a robust rationale for its protection and enhancement linked to heritage landscape, biodiversity and climate change. The loss of many other specific policies currently in the SAAP weakens the protection of habitats and biodiversity safeguarding. Reference to Babergh Green Infrastructure 2012 included in this point is appropriate but the exclusion of the Stowmarket Area Action Plan 2013 is not.

Part 2 Local Policies 16 Healthy Communities and Infrastructure (page 102 -103) LP28 Designated Open Spaces (page 102) 1. Object to LP28 due to the exclusion of a Local Green Space policy and process which is fair and consistent to all communities. All neighbourhoods would benefit from a transparent opportunity to seek designation of highly valued Local Green Spaces within this emerging Joint Local Plan subject to meeting the NPPF criteria. This Draft JLP does not provide an equal opportunity, which discriminates against neighbourhoods where no adopted Neighbourhood Development Plan exists

2. Object to statements in LP28 that only permits Local Green Space (LGS) designation through neighbourhood plans. We understand it is not appropriate for Stowmarket to embark on a Neighbourhood Development Plan (agreed with MSDC). We view this omission as none-compliant with NPPF para 99 which says: “The designation of land as Local Green Space through LOCAL and neighbourhood plans allows communities to identify and protect green areas of particular importance to them.”

3. Object to LP28 (page 102) as it is not sufficiently robust to protect open spaces / countryside from speculative development, particularly if MSDC fall short of a 5-yr housing supply in the future. (TMGT have been in contact with Cllrs and members of the planning policy team for more than a year to seek inclusion of an LGS policy and process within the emerging JLP to strengthen the protection of highly valued small tracts of land which meet the NPPF criteria – Opportunities have been missed to move this agenda forward for the benefit of all communities across Mis Suffolk)

4. Object to the LP28 Preferred approach as this has been defined and limited by the Open Space Assessment (2019) purporting to provide new evidence which discounts the option of carrying forward existing designations in Local Plans / Core Strategies into the Joint Local Plan. The new evidence is skewed by the stated definition of ‘open space’ which excludes Local Green Spaces as defined in the NPPF para paragraph 99 which says: “The designation of land as Local Green Space through local and neighbourhood plans allows communities to identify and protect green areas of particular importance to them.” We want the discounted alternative approach to be reconsidered and carried forward as the reason for discounting it is flawed, irrational and based on biased evidence unfairly ruling out the inclusion of natural open spaces.

Tinklers Meadow Green Team Response to the Mid Suffolk Joint Local Plan Consultation

We ask for a NEW Local Green Space policy and process to be established ASAP enabling communities to propose Local Green Spaces for inclusion in the next Draft Local Plan. An LGS policy can offer communities a higher level of protection for cherished open spaces. A wide range of benefits are evident: The Natural Environment White Paper (The Natural Choice: securing the value of nature 2011) highlighted “the importance of green spaces to the health and happiness of local communities”. Green spaces, particularly natural green spaces, located close to people provide a range of social, environmental and economic benefits including: - • Improved mental and physical health • Increased physical activity • Increased social activity • Improvements to Children’s learning • Reduced crime • Improved community cohesion and sense of belonging • More attractive places to live, work, play, visit and invest • Enhanced opportunities for wildlife habitats and wildlife corridors • Climate change adaptation (e.g. flood alleviation)

There are many examples of districts that recognise NDP’s are not possible yet are committed to developing a ‘fair to all’ route to strengthen the protection, preservation and enhancement of Open Spaces known as Local Green Spaces. Districts with LGS policy guidance seek to support local communities/individuals in putting forward their local open spaces for formal designation as a Local Green Space in a robust, consistent and transparent manner.

https://www.richmondshire.gov.uk/planning/planning-policy/local-green-space-consultation/

Attached is a Draft Exemplar policy and a Draft Exemplar LGS Survey for Tinklers Meadow which we believe meets the criteria for LGS designation (NPPF para 100) and is worthy of this extra level of protection and inclusion in the next JLP. We welcome an opportunity to refine the Tinklers Meadow draft exemplar survey for MSDC consideration.

Part 1 Objectives and Strategic Policies 03 Vision and Objectives – Housing (page 10) i. “Delivery of the right types of homes, of the right tenure in the right place meeting need”

We object to the omission of a ‘Gap’ policy to ensure green buffers or strategic gaps’ are designated and included in the emerging JLP. There is a visual and physical separation between the adjoining settlements of Onehouse village, a small village located on higher plateau land (population 947 in 2013 estimated at 2,325 in 2017 (Suffolk Observatory) to the north west of Stowmarket town (Stowmarket exceeds its predicted population of 20,250 in the SAAP by 2020 with the 2017 estimate at 21,252 (Suffolk Observatory). A JLP Gap policy will address concerns of future housing growth where the merging of two distinct communities pose danger of coalescence through on-going development large or small. The gap between Onehouse and Stowmarket is located where the Rattlesden river valley (designated as a Special Landscape Area) narrows towards the B1115; the old roman road out of Stowmarket towards Great Finborough in the west; also known as the scenic gateway in and out of town. A gap here is essential to retain the openness and character of the land between Onehouse and Stowmarket. Here the difference between high plateau land and river valley meadowland is distinct and well defined by the contrasting landscape of each settlement in this GAP.

Tinklers Meadow Green Team Response to the Mid Suffolk Joint Local Plan Consultation

Gap context relevant to Stowmarket and Onehouse for inclusion in the next JLP SAAP 2.13 Onehouse is classified as a Secondary village within Mid Suffolk's adopted Core Strategy and is unsuitable for growth, but capable of taking appropriate residential infill and development for local needs only. SAAP describes Onehouse as ‘a small village located on higher plateau land to the north west of Stowmarket’. Despite recent changes the rural context of the village - narrow tree lined lanes, lime avenues and Northfield Wood (managed by the Woodland Trust), remain intact, with the integrity and distinct character of its own characteristic of the village setting’.

SAAP 2.9 Villages which surround Stowmarket comprise small rural settlements located on elevated land above the river valleys including Onehouse. All contain historic buildings which reflect the local vernacular of Suffolk; however, the larger villages also contain notable areas of more recent housing. All of these settlements have their own individual identity.

The Gap policy also relates to: Part 2 Local Policies – 13 Housing (page 58); 15 Environment (page 84); 16 Healthy Communities and Infrastructure (page 102) and Part 3 17 Non-Strategic - Place and Allocations Policies (page120)

Part 2 Local Policies - The Historic Environment (page 90 -91) LP 20 – The Historic Environment Object to LP20 – as statements are not sufficiently robust. Nor do they capture the essence nor ‘sense of place’ relating to historic landscape settings. Although 15.31 includes landscape in the definition of Heritage assets, this has got lost in the policy statement which seems to focus almost exclusively on buildings. The JLP recognises the rural context of BMSDC yet the LP20 statement is bland compared to the rural richness across the JLP districts.

NPPF Paragraph: 039 Reference ID: 18a-039-20190723 Revision date: 23 07 2019 – non-designated heritage assets are described as ‘Non-designated heritage assets are buildings, monuments, sites, places, areas or landscapes identified by plan-making bodies as having a degree of heritage significance meriting consideration in planning decisions, but which do not meet the criteria for designated heritage assets’. The SAAP provides clear detail of many protected historic landscape settings based on sound evidence. Refer to SAAP Natural Environment, Biodiversity and the Historic Environment (pages 92-98) SAAP Policy 9.1 and Map 9.1 (Strategic Biodiversity Areas). SAAP Policy 9.2 River Valleys. SAAP Policy 9.3 River Rattlesden. SAAP Policy 9.4 River Gipping. SAAP Policy 9.5 Historic Environment. Also, SAAP 16 Appendix E Mid Suffolk District Council's Glossary of Terms states ‘Special Landscape Area (SLA): Local areas of land specifically identified for its special landscape qualities that do not have national recognition but are still worthy of protection. These include river valleys, areas of heathland, historic parklands and gardens, and other areas of countryside where the topography and natural vegetation produce an area of special landscape quality’. The JLP does not take sufficient account of landscape as a heritage asset. The Rattlesden river valley is both an heritage landscape asset and a rich green wildlife corridor.

Part 2 Local Policies – Health and Education Provision (page 107) LP 32 – Health and Education Provision Object to LP32. This policy is unrealistic in its intent. Without a more proactive approach and needs greater consideration around delivery issues as current healthcare is already stretched to capacity. Healthcare needs to be in place as the population increases and Suffolk is an area which struggles to attract all healthcare professionals. Infrastructure must ensure delivery of services (both health and education) where it is needed and in a timely manner.

Tinklers Meadow Green Team Response to the Mid Suffolk Joint Local Plan Consultation

Over 1,000 new homes are identified in the Draft JLP which can only exacerbate the situation. Local capacity to provide healthcare in relation to the potential site allocations is only available at Needham Market Surgery. The growth identified in the Joint Local Plan would necessitate additional healthcare provision (developer funded through s106 or CIL), which would principally be focused on GP-related medical services and supporting community health services. However, Suffolk is an area which struggles to attract new healthcare professionals including GPs and non-medical prescribers. Although national policy is to deliver primary healthcare in new and innovative ways, lack of appropriate staff will provide local challenges.

Provision of costs towards buildings (LP32:2) is excellent but does not mitigate lack of staff. According to the 2018 NHS patient satisfaction survey for Ipswich & East Suffolk CCG just over 20% patients found it difficult to get through to someone at their GP practice on the phone and approximately 25% patients did not have a good experience when trying to make an appointment, both higher than the national average.

It is crucial that infrastructure ensures delivery of services (both health and education) where it is needed so that the population does not have to travel greater distances. This would be counter to environmental objectives and policies as it increases congestion and related emissions and reduces the number of school children who walk or cycle to school. It also increases cost and reduces accessibility to the public. Infrastructure needs to be in place as the population increases rather than lagging well behind.

Summary

Whilst all of these responses are termed ‘objections’, they are offered as constructive comments in the spirit of optimism. We want a well set out, forward thinking, robust Local Plan which takes account of the strong, positive policy statements we currently rely on and prepares us for an ambitious future where people’s current and future needs are fully considered.

Thank you to Mid Suffolk District Council for the opportunity to be part of this public consultation process.

Tinklers Meadow Green Team

28th September 2019

190924 JT DRAFT Exemplar- Local Green Spaces Survey

Introduction – This Draft is based on a Local Council’s policy and process which ensures a fair, consistent and equal opportunity for all groups of local residents. Completed survey proposes inclusion of a highly valued Local green Space in this districts emerging Local Plan where no Neighbourhood Development Plan has begun or is adopted (the NPPF criteria for Local Green Space must be met)

Please use this form to provide as much relevant information as possible on sites you would like to be considered for designation as a Local Green Space. Complete a separate form for each site. The site assessment form must include a single site boundary for each site that is being submitted and where possible be supported with further information such as photographs. This can all be completed via this form.

Please take into account when completing your submission that the council requires evidence as to why an area is of particular significance to the local community and why it warrants additional protection compared to other areas of open green space across the District. The site must be located within the Exemplar District.

Anonymous proposals cannot be accepted, as we may need to contact you in the future. Once the responses have been received, the Local Planning Authority will consider all of the Local Green Space designations submitted and those found to meet the requirements will be published as part of the Preferred Options consultation in date for further comment. If you wish to be added to our consultation database for upcoming Local Plan Review consultations, please add your email address and make this clear in the 'Any Further Comments' section below.

The deadline to submit a site is ……….. date

Submitting the Form  Please use a separate form for each site.  Please provide a response where * is indicated  Anonymous proposals cannot be accepted, as we may need to contact you in the future.  You can submit your Site Assessment Form and OS Map containing the site boundary by email to [email protected]  Alternatively, you can return by post to: Planning Policy, Exemplar District Council, full address

Site Criteria  The site must be located within Exemplar District  The site must be of particular significance to the local community warranting additional protection compared to other areas of green space in the District.

Call for Sites Webpage To visit the dedicated Local Green Spaces Designation webpage please view at https://www.exemplar.gov.uk/planning/planning-policy/local-green-space-consultation/

Local Green Spaces Survey Form

1. Your Details (Office Use) Site Ref: Name* Judith Thompson Tinklers Meadow Keep Me Green Team Organisation

Local Resident Parish / Town Council Status / Organisation Type* Community Group Other

Contact Address*

Telephone Number Email Address

2. Ownership Details G Do you own the Site?* Yes No No. of Owners/Controller Type of Owner/Controller How many owners are Private Landowner there?* (Where applicable, Single Developer please provide name(s) and address(es) of the owners) 2 or 3 Public Authority 4 or 5 Other

6 or more Mixture Don’t Know

Where applicable, please provide name(s) and No other owners address(es) of other owners (If you are the sole owner of the site and have supplied your contact details in the previous section you do not need to add it again here. However, if there are multiple

owners please include contact information for each individual)

Are all owners aware of your Yes No submission to designate the

land?*

Yes, full support Partial support No

Owners are not aware of this submission

Owners are both nephews of the previous owner. Neither are Are all owners supportive experienced developers. They inherited the small field on Best and of your submission to Most Versatile (BMV) Agricultural land in 2014. In November 2017 the land within a designated Special landscape Area along a wildlife river designate the land? (If you valley corridor was cleared of many mature trees, sections of historic have answered ‘Partial hedgerow were removed, an historic surface water land drain and ditch support’ or "No" to the was filled in and the soil surface heaped into huge piles of earth and question above please debris. The applicant carried out significant habitat destruction on the provide further information). site in November 2017 prior to planning permission, since when the site area and immediate surroundings of Tinklers Meadow (The historic name of this small meadow) have been left undisturbed with huge piles of logs and areas of scrub. In March 2018 an outline planning proposal DC/18/01217 for 56 dwellings was submitted, which was withdrawn in late summer 2018 due to unresolved issues. (100 objections). In December 2018 another outline planning proposal DC/18/05570 was submitted for 4 dwellings. (146 objections to date) Unresolved issues remain.

3. Site Information & Location (Office Use) Site Ref:

Land south of Finborough Road, Stowmarket, Suffolk IP14 1PY Site Address* (If no physical Historically known on the 1842 Tithe map as field 255 and named Tinklers Meadow in address exists, the Apportionment Document for Stowmarket please provide a description of the location of the Site).

1.47 hectares Site Area (Hectares) Yes No Don’t know MSDC – Planning Team Blue - Outline planning permission (DC/18/01217) was applied for in December 2018 and withdrawn. Another submission Is the site subject to planning permission was made in December 2018 for development?* (If Yes, please provide details). (DC/18/05570 which relates to the first application) MSDC Planning team advised me on 10/09/19 “this application is awaiting the submission of necessary further information which is particular to address concerns in respect of ecology, floods and as raised

2 by the Environment Agency”

Yes No Don’t know Current landowners have a history of failed MSDC ‘call for sites’ submissions since 2014 – MSDC Has the site been allocated for discounted (rated submissions RED) due to poor development in the Local Plan relationship to settlement, services and facilities previously?* August 2017 SHELAA Figure 1 methodology flow chart pg. 7. Also refer to pages 8,9 and 10- 2.4. 2.15 states ‘RED’

Is the site previously developed land?* Yes No The land currently is a disused pasture field

On the planning application form DC/18/05570 the question is asked – Is the site currently vacant? Applicant says ‘No’ – This is not true as a dilapidated railway carriage is the only temporary structure on site merging into the landscape. No permanent structure What is the current use of the site?* exists on the land. The previous landowner lived in a caravan which was removed following his death in April / May 2014

Natural England classify this agricultural land as Grade 2 the second highest ‘best and most versatile’ (BMV) for agricultural use. (confirmed on Mid Suffolk District Council on their interactive maps)

North East South West To the north is the Immediately to the The River An agricultural B1115 road out of east are 4 Rattlesden is to field. Planning Stowmarket detached houses the South, apart permission has towards Great set well back from from a 70 metre been granted for Finborough. A the B1115 behind stretch which a farm machinery steep bank of wide grass verge, a abuts our land at and food store natural greenery culvert and a Danecroft set back from the (trees) is on the private access Cottage which is road with an northern side of paved area. Two of a County Wildlife access and exit this road, set these homes Site. egress for Adjacent/Surrounding further back border the land agricultural Land Use* beyond the bank a boundary to the Immediately vehicles adjacent G (Please indicate the land further row of east. south beyond the to this land. use according to the trees, then a strip river is a large- appropriate boundary) of grass, beyond 1. Front and rear scale Broiler that housing garden of the Poultry farm nearest home has (approx.120 m fence abutting the from the B1115) land for a short way.

2. Another property has a larger section of their back garden abutting the land. This garden has

3 mature trees throughout

Is the site*: Within the settlement boundary?

Partially within the settlement boundary? G Adjacent to the settlement boundary?

Open countryside?

4. Site Characteristics Is the site an extensive Yes No tract of land*?

(Extensive tracts of land The site is a clearly defined 1.47-hectare small tract of land. Each boundary cannot be designated as is of a specific nature and clearly defined. To the south a river and a short run of fencing to the south east where Danecroft boundary meets the site, G Local Green Space. An north the B1115, directly west a deep ditch with newly planted hedgerow extensive tract is a large which separates agricultural pasture, and west chain link and boarded field or grouping of fence separate the site from neighbouring gardens numerous fields which are not local in scale).

Yes No Yes - Local residents living nearby to the north, south, east and west are within walking distance and highly value this site. Due to the precise location of this small tract of land being near to where the Stowmarket boundary meets with three other Parish boundaries, the site is close to communities living within each of these parishes. Onehouse is approximately 150 metres to the west. Great Finborough directly south / south west of the River Rattlesden. Combs Parish within 200 metres to the south east of the site south of the River Rattlesden. The site is a common denominator linking communities from each of these parishes to the shared landscape and the location of public and permissive footpaths, contour of land, meandering river and road.

The site is a highly valued, green open space connecting local people to a Is the site in close familiar landscape and the built environment from open countryside and proximity to the conversely connecting people either pedestrians, those in vehicles and

community it serves*? cyclists to the urban environment of town via pavement or the green tree- (e.g. walking distance) lined meandering road. The whole site is a highly visible, attractive open space from adjacent pavement and road additionally in close proximity to families living next to the northern boundary. There is a popular circular walking route adjacent to the northern boundary on a public footpath. Local residents living in Finborough Road, Wash Lane, Combs Lane or travelling to the abutting parishes of Onehouse, Great Finborough and Combs are regular users of this route. Additionally, from the housing estate to the north of the site there is a cut through onto Finborough Road which regular walkers use to access the circular route passing north of the site. Walking adjacent to the site on the public footpath from east to west is the shortest and most direct route into Stowmarket town centre to access a wide range of facilities and services. Walking past the site to the east takes people living nearby to the nearest bus route. The site entrance is at the exact place where open countryside to the west connects to the built environment to the east at the place where the ‘Welcome to Stowmarket in the heart of Suffolk’ sign is positioned. For residents living in homes set well back on 4 higher ground to the north, this site is very precious – Dark skies, open countryside, and connection to the tree lined, wildlife river valley is evident at the site southern boundary. (The site is like a corner piece of a jigsaw – without it the whole is incomplete) The open space, big sky, view across the meadow to the tree lined river valley landscape is unique.

Refer to maps

Yes No This site is true to the historic local character as outlined in Natural England National Character assessment (NCA) description for Area 86 which states ‘particularly important semi natural habitats, lowland meadows, pasture, rich valley floors, mosaics of valley floor habitats; marsh, fen, wet woodland’

The downward gradient of the sloped site invites the eye in and exemplifies the description in the MSDC Landscape character Assessment 2015

This green small tract of land below eye level directs the view into the sites open space providing:

Physical connection – a sense of place, which feels like a close personal connection to the tree lined river valley south side of site

The site key characteristics match the Mid Suffolk Landscape Character Assessment 2015 description of ‘wooded valley meadowlands and rolling hill claylands’ Is the proposed site a) Shallow river valley within upper undulating plateau landscape local in character*? b) Hedgerow and mature trees on boundaries c) Medium blocks of woodland or tree lines (E.g. How does the site d) Open arable fields on valley sides and plateau connect physically, e) Small enclosed fields in the river valley visually and socially to the f) Special landscape Area (designated in the Stowmarket Area local community?) Action Plan 2013). The physical separation between river and road narrows creating a stronger and more personal link

between humanity and nature

Described in a Greenlight Environmental Consultancy Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment March 2018 to be representative of the

wider landscape character and type for the area, in good condition and having a local designation

Visual connection – a sense of open space, which

a) Is a visually distinctive landscape with an attractive character and wooded skyline, b) Valued local green space for open views and quiet solitude. c) Site specific scenic entrance to the town d) Site specific scenic place leading the eye into open countryside with visually important distant views e) Visually significant and important site connecting urban to rural landscape

Social Connection – this edge of town site is a well-known historic landmark a) known well by young and old, established and new residents in the locality b) A specific, familiar geographical point of reference “you know the field where Joey kept his caravan – last field before Onehouse”

Yes No

This field has always been a small meadow which through time has made a significant contribution to the growth of Stowmarket’s economy through industries such as hop growing for local brewing and osier beds for basket making. Also use as a stock field / holding field when the town marketplace was a thriving centre for selling and buying. This small field is like a full stop – the only undeveloped open space on the western edge of Stowmarket. Minding the gap between town and village boundary acting as a strategic green buffer, ensuring each community retains its own cohesive identity.

Tinklers Meadow is capable of enduring beyond the end of the plan period. It is small enough to ‘look after itself’ acting as an anchor to the river valley with wildlife flowing through. It will make a long- lasting contribution to climate change by remaining green for future generations and biodiversity gain. The owners would also have an option to rent or sell the site for agricultural use. Is the site capable of enduring as a Local A new town wide project ‘Stow Stories’ is to be launched on October Green Space 5th, 2019. The inspiration for this project emerged when the first Designation beyond the planning application was withdrawn in summer 2018. end of the plan period Stow Stories Vision: re-connect this river valley to residents and (2035)*? (e.g. special visitors for them to enjoy now and to safeguard it for future features & qualities generations. remain long term or no alternative use planned) Protect - Preserve – Enhance

1) Protect this river valley as a green wildlife corridor with diverse biodiversity habitats 2) Preserve this area to retain its landscape character and its heritage valuing its contribution to the town’s past 3) Enhance the river valley through sensitive care and working together with others 4) Deter speculative development

Refer to: Stow Stories - Sharing Memories to Secure a Greener Future

5. Local Significance The proposed designation of Local Green Spaces must be based on evidence to demonstrate why the area is demonstrably special to a local community and holds a particular local significance. To meet this requirement an area should meet one or more of the following:

• be of local significance because of its beauty; • • be of local significance because of its historic importance to the local community; 6 • • be of local significance because of its recreational value; • • be of local significance because of the tranquillity it provides; • • be of local significance because of the wildlife it is home to.

To help in this assessment please complete the relevant boxes below providing evidence to support your answer.

In all instances the council requires evidence as to why an area is of particular significance to the local community and why it warrants additional protection compared to other areas of open green space across the district. Also, where a proposed site is already protected e.g. nature designation, listed building or local planning policy then evidence must be provided as to why additional protection is necessary.

Yes No

Yes – this site as a small meadow reflects the intrinsic nature and beauty of small, historical enclosures running through the valley

This site is at a key position within the highly valued river valley. Extract for the Stowmarket Area Action Plan is clear that the visual attractiveness is historic and since the first settlement in Stowmarket this pace was instrumental in the establishment and growth of the town

Refer to Mid Suffolk Stowmarket Area Action Plan (February 2013)

SAAP - Strategic Objective 3 Does this site hold a Enhancing the River Valleys particular local significance To protect and enhance Stowmarket’s two main river valleys, the because of its beauty*? Rivers Rattlesden and Gipping, by maintaining and enhancing (e.g. Visual attractiveness and their biodiversity, landscape, and accessibility to the public. contribution to townscape, landscape, character and/ or The protection of the river valleys safeguarding and improving the G setting of the settlement habitats they contain will encourage wildlife and support and extend important ecological green corridors. Improving public including views to and from it). access where this does not conflict with biodiversity gives opportunities to improve the quality of life and foster the health and well-being of residents and visitors

SAAP Landmarks and the Skyline 4.17 The location of Stowmarket lies within two river valleys, which will have an impact on acceptable building heights within different locations across the town. Stowmarket’s skyline will be protected to ensure that the views in, out and across the town identified in the Stowmarket Environmental Assessment (2008) are not harmed.

SAAP - The Strategic Area for the river valleys is set out in Map 9.1. The two rivers were once key approach routes to the town, but now the valleys provide important views in and out of the town, provide character, and act as key gateways to the town. The river valleys are strategic biodiversity corridors and form part of a continuous recreation and wildlife corridor linking habitats together.

Yes No

The site history is reflected in the river valleys history, which includes transporting stones from Caen in France to build the Abbey in Bury St Edmonds. The meadows alongside of the meandering river were used to grow hops and its osier beds provided willow rods for basket-making. Eastward from Tinklers Meadow farmland connects to woodland and water meadows. And the valley carries on, through the Museum of East Anglian Life, to the allotments at Combs Ford, and Pikes Meadow before reaching the River Gipping.

There is much to be proud of in Stowmarket, a town which takes its name from the Old English word ‘Stow’ meaning ‘principal place’. It was granted a market charter way back in 1347. Through research unearth a story that matters to you linked to Stowmarket’s Rattlesden River Valley. From Tinklers Meadow west of the town to Does this site hold a Pikes Meadow south of the town. Explore this ‘River of Memories’, particular local significance with its rural landscape which made a significant contribution to the because of its historic growth, historic setting and identity of Stowmarket. value*? Stow Stories – A new town wide project for Stowmarket. There is (e.g. Historic Building, much to be proud of in Stowmarket, a town which takes its name G remains or features including from the Old English word ‘Stow’ meaning ‘principal place’. It was listed buildings, scheduled granted a market charter way back in 1347. Through research local ancient monuments, people of all ages will be supported to unearth a story that matters structures or ancient trees on to them linked to Stowmarket’s Rattlesden River Valley. From site or forms the setting of it). Tinklers Meadow west of the town to Pikes Meadow south of the town. This rural landscape made a significant contribution to the growth, historic setting and identity of Stowmarket.

SAAP - Strategic Objective 6 Protecting and enhancing the environmental heritage To protect, manage and where possible enhance Stowmarket’s natural and built environment and ensure its continued contribution to the town’s heritage, culture, environment and economy. The environment is valued as an attractive setting for the settlements, its contribution to quality of life and sense of wellbeing and indirectly the economy of the town. The historic, natural and built environment in particular will continue to act as a draw and the action plan will ensure a continued contribution to the District's culture, environment, and economy. Protection and enhancement will be supported through designation of important areas, features and structures, planning policies and required quality of design.

Does this site hold a Yes No particular local significance because of its recreational Particularly important to the local community because of its value*? recreational value includes the benefit to people’s health and (e.g. supporting a variety of wellbeing from: G recreational activities or activity of particular 1) Mental health benefit from easy access to green open significance/importance to space surrounded by open skyline and nature (Natural local community) England latest research states “Most people’s experience of nature is close to home, in green spaces in towns and cities. Spending time in nature is good for your wellbeing”

8 2) Direct contact with open space to observe wildlife – As the site is part of an established wildlife corridor with patchwork like connections to other habitats including ancient woodland to the north, south and west there is a unique richness to the wildlife. For example, three species of owl hunt on this site – Barn, Little and Tawny. 3) People of all ages benefit from physical activity of walking / jogging/ cycling / dog walking / pram pushing passing this site on a circular route through open countryside with little pollution

The benefits above also apply to the local community who regularly travel east and west of Stowmarket along the B1115 – this road meanders along the gentle contours of the land running parallel with the river and vehicles are slowing down at the site location due to bends and the reduced speed limit.

Refer to Natural England – people’s engagement with nature – a story map Yes No

This site holds a particular local significance because of its tranquillity.

This site is located at the western gateway into Stowmarket at the precise place where countryside and urban environment meets. A lovely and tranquil place, offering outstanding views of the town from the top of nearby rolling hills and where, magical encounters with wildlife are not unusual. A highly valued local space which we want to keep green.

SAAP - River Valleys Context 9.7 Within the town the river valleys provide: varied habitats and species; sites with biodiversity and geodiversity conservation interests; and a sense of tranquillity and natural space. Does this site hold a

particular local significance SAAP Policy 9.2 because of its tranquillity*? River Valleys (e.g. place for quiet reflection 1). The environment within the river valleys, including the G and peaceful enjoyment) landscape, water, environment, and wildlife habitats will be conserved and enhanced.

SAAP Policy 9.3 River Rattlesden

1). Within the valley of the River Rattlesden, development proposals must make appropriate provision to accommodate the flood plain, protect biodiversity, and water quality. Development should be of an appropriate scale and form to integrate with the riverside environment. The Council will expect: 1) high quality design and enhancement to the public realm; and improved pedestrian and cycle access in areas where this will not prejudice biodiversity. 2). The existing Mid Suffolk Local Plan has identified the flood plain and the river valley of the River Rattlesden as Special Landscape Area from the Combs Ford Allotments westwards to Wash Lane and beyond. In this area an extension to the Museum of East Anglian Life was anticipated. Although a new approach to landscape character protection may be expected across the County of Suffolk, development should be prevented unless it relates to the needs of the Museum.

9 2). Planning permission will not be granted where the proposed development or associated mitigation measures would have an unacceptable adverse impact on: i. flooding and flood risk; ii. quality of ground or surface water; iii. biodiversity; iv. public access. 3). Non-conforming uses will be deterred from the river valleys. Mid

refer to SAAP and Objection letters attached relating to DC18/01217 and DC/18/05570

Yes No

Many local residents are amateur environmentalists keen to observe nature and wildlife. Some have kept local observation records for over 30 years, noting species types including mammals, birds, moths, butterflies, invertebrates and amphibians. Records have been shared with other enthusiasts and the Suffolk Biodiversity Information Service. This site holds a particular local significance as it is a new and complementary habitat best described as scrub. (Scrub is a priority habitat within the UK Biodiversity Action Plan Priority Habitat Descriptions Gov. Defra) Refer to Priority (NERC ACT SEC 41) Species list attached

This is a unique habitat connected to a mosaic of other habitats Does this site hold a along the valley eastwards though a privately owned County particular local significance Wildlife Site of mixed woodland, historic osier beds, sedge and fen at Danecroft, eastwards through water meadows at an abutting because of its richness in County Wildlife Site on land at the Museum of East Anglian Life, wildlife*? into allotments, though Pikes Meadow and on to the river Gipping. (e.g. rare habitat or features G which support numerous or This site area is located at the tip of the SLA river valley and at a particularly rare/important unique ‘pinch point’. This adds value to the site, connecting rather species of wildlife) than ‘fragmenting’ the landscape. Loss of this local site as an open space risks harm to biodiversity.

SAAP 9 Natural Environment, Biodiversity and the Historic

Environment - Natural Environment and Biodiversity Natural connections 9.5 Ecological corridors link habitats together and provide routes or 'steppingstones' for the migration, dispersal, and genetic exchange of species in the wider environment. It is important that such corridors in Stowmarket are protected and enhanced in accordance with the NPPF 9.6 Key Biodiversity Areas have been identified on the Strategic Biodiversity Areas, Map 9.1, to assist in demonstrating the need for natural connections through Stowmarket. ‘Key Biodiversity Areas’ are areas with a historical biodiversity value, and include key woodlands, ponds and areas of grassland within Stowmarket.

Refer to SAAP Map 9.1 Strategic Biodiversity Areas 10

Gov: 25-year environment plan seeks to Enhance beauty, heritage and engagement with the natural environment. Keeping this small pasture green supports this plan

6. Any Further Comments Tinklers Meadow was a key site during an event called ‘Beating the Bounds’ during the 2019 Suffolk Walking Festival.

Tinklers Meadow is the source of inspiration for the new town wide project called Stow Stories -

Natural England National Character Profiles (NCA) - 86 East of England a) Include a description of natural and cultural features over time b) A broad analysis of each area’s characteristics and ecosystem services c) Are guidance documents which follow natural lines in Landscape, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment d) Include ‘Statements of Environmental Opportunity (SEOs) offer guidance on critical issues, which could help achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future

We understand and agree growth of the town is essential and welcomed in a planned way. However, when speculative developers thrust inappropriate housing planning applications into locations where proposed houses are out of character, nor sensitive to either the site location or its environment the very qualities which bring people to live in this historic market town are destroyed.

Tinklers Meadow is a visually important open space, precious to both local communities within walking distance and wider community of Stowmarket and the abutting parishes. We seek designation as a LOCAL GREEN SPACE within the emerging Babergh and Mid Suffolk Joint Local Plan to strengthen the protection of this highly valued field contributing to people’s health and wellbeing. Keeping Tinklers meadow green for future generations, biodiversity gain and Stowmarket’s Greener future addressing BMSDC climate change emergency declaration.

The rivers Gipping and Rattlesden and small tracts of land such as this site were the lifeblood of the landscape long before settlers chose this place. Such sites as this location especially next to a river still secure the towns boundaries and shape the towns local character and distinctiveness. Such unique highly valued sites are worth standing up for and securing for the future through seeking designation in the Local Plan as a Local Green Space.

Documents such as those below would be attached as evidence to support statements:

1) Site map 2) Site and surroundings map 3) Open Space Society pathway chart to demonstrate this small field is suitable for designation consideration as a Local Green Space

11 4) National and MDSC policy chart to demonstrate the importance of keeping Tinklers Meadow green 5) Letters of support from local residents 6) Suffolk Wildlife Trust County Wildlife Site maps and Information 7) Suffolk Walking Festival programme ‘Beating the Bounds’ 8) Stow Stories background information 9) Suffolk Wildlife Trust – map showing two County Wildlife Sites in close proximity to the site 10) Heart-warming otter story ‘Otterly Magic’ 11) Definition of Scrubland habitat and value to biodiversity 12) Stow Stories - Sharing Memories to Secure a Greener Future 13) Stow Stories -publicity flyer for the launch October 5th, 2019 14) Poem Forever Land 15) Stowmarket Area Action Plan 16) Natural England – People’s engagement with nature – A story map

Photographs:

Disused meadow - unmanaged Site boundaries north / south / east /west Dilapidated railway carriage merging into the landscape Protected species in decline observed on nearby County Wildlife Sites

7. OS Map with Site Boundary* An Ordnance Survey map with the site boundary clearly outlined must be provided with the site assessment form. The map should preferably be on a scale of 1:1250 or 1:2500 of G size A4 or A3. It must be clearly annotated with the name/location of your site and your name and contact details (in case they become detached from the form).

Data Protection Statement: The personal information collected on this form will be dealt with according to the data protection principles as set out in the Data Protection Act 2018. The information you provide will be used only for the purposes of informing the development of future strategies and policies on the designation of Local Green Spaces and the Local Plan review. If you require further information about how your data is processed please read the privacy notices online at www.Exemplar.gov.uk/about-the-council/data-protection/.

Disclaimer: The proposing of a site at this stage does not necessarily mean that it will be allocated in the Local Plan. The choice of sites to be selected for inclusion in the Local Plan will not be made until later in the plan making process and in full consultation with the community and stakeholders.

25th September 2019 Date*

Print Name*

Please return completed form by along with a site map to [email protected] or alternatively, you can return by post to: Planning Policy, Exemplar District Council, Address

12 190924 TMGT DRAFT Exemplar- Local Green Spaces Survey

Introduction – This Draft is based on a Local Council’s policy and process which ensures a fair, consistent and equal opportunity for all groups of local residents. Completed survey proposes inclusion of a highly valued Local Green Space in this district emerging Local Plan where no Neighbourhood Development Plan has begun or is adopted (the NPPF criteria for Local Green Space must be met)

The deadline to submit a site is ……….. date

Call for Sites Webpage To visit the dedicated Local Green Spaces Designation webpage please view at https://www.exemplar.gov.uk/planning/planning-policy/local-green-space-consultation/

Local Green Spaces Survey Form

1. Your Details (Office Use) Site Ref: Name* Judith Thompson Tinklers Meadow Keep Me Green Team Organisation

Local Resident Parish / Town Council Status / Organisation Type* Community Group Other

Contact Address*

Telephone Number

Email Address

6 or more Mixture Don’t Know

Where applicable, please No other owners provide name(s) and

address(es) of other owners

(If you are the sole owner of the site and have supplied

your contact details in the previous section you do not need to add it again here. However, if there are multiple owners please include contact information for each individual)

Are all owners aware of your Yes No submission to designate the

land?*

Yes, full support Partial support No

Owners are not aware of this submission

3. Site Information & Location (Office Use) Site Ref:

Land south of Finborough Road, Stowmarket, Suffolk IP14 1PY Site Address* (If no physical Historically known on the 1842 Tithe map as field 255 and named Tinklers Meadow in address exists, the Apportionment Document for Stowmarket 1842 please provide a description of the location of the Site).

1.47 hectares Site Area (Hectares) Yes No Don’t know MSDC – Planning Team Blue - Outline planning permission (DC/18/01217) was applied for in Is the site subject to planning permission December 2018 and withdrawn. Another submission for development?* (If Yes, please provide was made in December 2018 details). (DC/18/05570 which relates to the first application) MSDC Planning team advised me on 10/09/19 “this application is awaiting the submission of necessary further information which is particular to address

2 concerns in respect of ecology, floods and as raised by the Environment Agency”

There 146 objections to this proposal so far

Is the site previously developed land?* Yes No The land currently is a disused pasture field On the planning application form DC/18/05570 the question is asked – Is the site currently vacant? Applicant says ‘No’ – This is not true as a dilapidated railway carriage is the only temporary structure on site merging into the landscape. No permanent structure What is the current use of the site?* exists on the land. The previous landowner lived in a caravan which was removed following his death in April / May 2014

Natural England classify this agricultural land as Grade 2 the second highest ‘best and most versatile’ (BMV) for agricultural use. (confirmed by Mid Suffolk District Council on their interactive maps)

2. Another property has a larger section of their back garden abutting the land. This garden has

3 mature trees throughout

Is the site*: Within the settlement boundary?

Partially within the settlement boundary? G Adjacent to the settlement boundary?

Open countryside?

4. Site Characteristics Is the site an extensive Yes No tract of land*?

Refer to maps

The downward gradient of the sloped site invites the eye in and exemplifies the description in the MSDC Landscape character Assessment 2015

This green small tract of land below eye level directs the view into the sites open space providing:

Physical connection – a sense of place, which feels like a close personal connection to the tree lined river valley south side of site

between humanity and nature

Described in a Greenlight Environmental Consultancy Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment March 2018 to be representative of the

wider landscape character and type for the area, in good condition and having a local designation

Visual connection – a sense of open space, which

Yes No

Refer to: Stow Stories - Sharing Memories to Secure a Greener Future

• be of local significance because of its beauty; • be of local significance because of its historic importance to the local community; • be of local significance because of its recreational value; 6 • be of local significance because of the tranquillity it provides; • be of local significance because of the wildlife it is home to.

To help in this assessment please complete the relevant boxes below providing evidence to support your answer.

Yes No

Yes – this site as a small meadow reflects the intrinsic nature and beauty of small, historical enclosures running through the valley

Refer to Mid Suffolk Stowmarket Area Action Plan (February 2013)

SAAP - Strategic Objective 3 Enhancing the River Valleys Does this site hold a To protect and enhance Stowmarket’s two main river valleys, the particular local significance Rivers Rattlesden and Gipping, by maintaining and enhancing their biodiversity, landscape, and accessibility to the public. because of its beauty*? (e.g. Visual attractiveness and The protection of the river valleys safeguarding and improving the contribution to townscape, habitats they contain will encourage wildlife and support and landscape, character and/ or extend important ecological green corridors. Improving public G setting of the settlement access where this does not conflict with biodiversity gives including views to and from it). opportunities to improve the quality of life and foster the health and well-being of residents and visitors

Yes G No

7 The site history is reflected in the river valleys history, which includes transporting stones from Caen in France to build the Abbey in Bury St Edmonds. The meadows alongside of the meandering river were used to grow hops and its osier beds provided willow rods for basket-making. Eastward from Tinklers Meadow farmland connects to woodland and water meadows. And the valley carries on, through the Museum of East Anglian Life, to the allotments at Combs Ford, and Pikes Meadow before reaching the River Gipping.

There is much to be proud of in Stowmarket, a town which takes its name from the Old English word ‘Stow’ meaning ‘principal place’. It was granted a market charter way back in 1347. Through research unearth a story that matters to you linked to Stowmarket’s Rattlesden River Valley. From Tinklers Meadow west of the town to Pikes Meadow south of the town. Explore this ‘River of Memories’, Does this site hold a with its rural landscape which made a significant contribution to the particular local significance growth, historic setting and identity of Stowmarket. because of its historic Stow Stories – A new town wide project for Stowmarket. There is value*? much to be proud of in Stowmarket, a town which takes its name (e.g. Historic Building, from the Old English word ‘Stow’ meaning ‘principal place’. It was remains or features including granted a market charter way back in 1347. Through research local listed buildings, scheduled people of all ages will be supported to unearth a story that matters ancient monuments, to them linked to Stowmarket’s Rattlesden River Valley. From structures or ancient trees on Tinklers Meadow west of the town to Pikes Meadow south of the site or forms the setting of it). town. This rural landscape made a significant contribution to the growth, historic setting and identity of Stowmarket.

Yes No Does this site hold a particular local significance Particularly important to the local community because of its because of its recreational recreational value includes the benefit to people’s health and wellbeing from: value*? (e.g. supporting a variety of 1) Mental health benefit from easy access to green open recreational activities or space surrounded by open skyline and nature (Natural G activity of particular England latest research states “Most people’s experience significance/importance to of nature is close to home, in green spaces in towns and local community) cities. Spending time in nature is good for your wellbeing” 2) Direct contact with open space to observe wildlife – As the site is part of an established wildlife corridor with patchwork like connections to other habitats including ancient woodland to the north, south and west there is a unique richness to the wildlife. For example, three species of owl hunt on this site – Barn, Little and Tawny.

8 3) People of all ages benefit from physical activity of walking / jogging/ cycling / dog walking / pram pushing passing this site on a circular route through open countryside with little pollution

Refer to Natural England – people’s engagement with nature – a story map Yes No

This site holds a particular local significance because of its tranquillity.

SAAP Policy 9.2 River Valleys Does this site hold a 1). The environment within the river valleys, including the particular local significance landscape, water, environment, and wildlife habitats will be because of its tranquillity*? conserved and enhanced. (e.g. place for quiet reflection G and peaceful enjoyment) SAAP Policy 9.3 River Rattlesden 1). Within the valley of the River Rattlesden, development proposals must make appropriate provision to accommodate the flood plain, protect biodiversity, and water quality. Development should be of an appropriate scale and form to integrate with the riverside environment. The Council will expect: 1) high quality design and enhancement to the public realm; and improved pedestrian and cycle access in areas where this will not prejudice biodiversity. 2). The existing Mid Suffolk Local Plan has identified the flood plain and the river valley of the River Rattlesden as Special Landscape Area from the Combs Ford Allotments westwards to Wash Lane and beyond. In this area an extension to the Museum of East Anglian Life was anticipated. Although a new approach to landscape character protection may be expected across the County of Suffolk, development should be prevented unless it relates to the needs of the Museum.

2). Planning permission will not be granted where the proposed development or associated mitigation measures would have an unacceptable adverse impact on: i. flooding and flood risk; ii. quality of ground or surface water; iii. biodiversity; iv. public access. 9 3). Non-conforming uses will be deterred from the river valleys. Mid

refer to SAAP and Objection letters attached relating to DC18/01217 and DC/18/05570

Yes No

This is a unique habitat connected to a mosaic of other habitats along the valley eastwards though a privately owned County Wildlife Site of mixed woodland, historic osier beds, sedge and fen at Danecroft, eastwards through water meadows at an abutting Does this site hold a County Wildlife Site on land at the Museum of East Anglian Life, into allotments, though Pikes Meadow and on to the river Gipping. particular local significance because of its richness in This site area is located at the tip of the SLA river valley and at a wildlife*? unique ‘pinch point’. This adds value to the site, connecting rather (e.g. rare habitat or features than ‘fragmenting’ the landscape. Loss of this local site as an open G which support numerous or space risks harm to biodiversity. particularly rare/important species of wildlife) SAAP 9 Natural Environment, Biodiversity and the Historic Environment - Natural Environment and Biodiversity Natural connections 9.5 Ecological corridors link habitats together and provide routes or 'steppingstones' for the migration, dispersal, and genetic exchange of species in the wider environment. It is important that such corridors in Stowmarket are protected and enhanced in accordance with the NPPF 9.6 Key Biodiversity Areas have been identified on the Strategic Biodiversity Areas, Map 9.1, to assist in demonstrating the need for natural connections through Stowmarket. ‘Key Biodiversity Areas’ are areas with a historical biodiversity value, and include key woodlands, ponds and areas of grassland within Stowmarket.

Refer to SAAP Map 9.1 Strategic Biodiversity Areas

Gov: 25-year environment plan seeks to Enhance beauty, heritage and engagement with the natural environment. Keeping this small pasture green supports this plan

6. Any Further Comments Tinklers Meadow was a site location during an event called ‘Beating the Bounds’ during the 2019 Suffolk Walking Festival.

Tinklers Meadow is the source of inspiration for the new town wide project called Stow Stories – Tinklers to Pikes and The Pickerel – Stowmarket Town Council, Suffolk Wildlife Trust, The Environment Agency, Red Gables Wellbeing Centre and the Museum of East Anglian Life have an active interest in this project

Documents such as those below would be attached as evidence to support statements:

1) Site map 2) Site and surroundings map 3) Open Space Society pathway chart to demonstrate this small field is suitable for designation consideration as a Local Green Space 4) National and MDSC policy chart to demonstrate the importance of keeping Tinklers Meadow green 5) Letters of support from local residents 6) Suffolk Wildlife Trust County Wildlife Site maps and Information

11 7) Suffolk Walking Festival programme ‘Beating the Bounds’ 8) Stow Stories background information 9) Suffolk Wildlife Trust – map showing two County Wildlife Sites in close proximity to the site 10) Heart-warming otter story ‘Otterly Magic’ 11) Definition of Scrubland habitat and value to biodiversity 12) Stow Stories - Sharing Memories to Secure a Greener Future 13) Stow Stories -publicity flyer for the launch October 5th, 2019 14) Poem Forever Land 15) Stowmarket Area Action Plan 16) Natural England – People’s engagement with nature – A story map

Photographs:

Disused meadow - unmanaged Site boundaries north / south / east /west Dilapidated railway carriage merging into the landscape Protected species in decline observed on nearby County Wildlife Sites

25th September 2019 Date*

Print Name*

Please return completed form by along with a site map to [email protected] or alternatively, you can return by post to: Planning Policy, Exemplar District Council, Address