Dc/20/01110 Land to the South of Union Road

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dc/20/01110 Land to the South of Union Road Committee Report Item 7B Reference: DC/20/01110 Case Officer: Bron Curtis Ward: Onehouse. Ward Member/s: Cllr John Matthissen. RECOMMENDATION – GRANT OUTLINE PLANNING PERMISSION WITH CONDITIONS Description of Development Outline Planning Application. (Access to be considered) for the erection of up to 146no dwellings including vehicular and pedestrian accesses, public open space, play space, landscaping, associated highways, drainage and utilities infrastructure Location Land To The South Of, Union Road, Onehouse, Suffolk Expiry Date: 08/10/2020 Application Type: OUT - Outline Planning Application Development Type: Major Large Scale - Dwellings Applicant: Endurance Estates Land Promotion Limited and Mr Paul Barn... Agent: Pegasus Group Parish: Onehouse Site Area: 7.61ha Density of Development: Gross Density (Total Site): up to 19 dph Details of Previous Committee / Resolutions and any member site visit: None Has a Committee Call In request been received from a Council Member (Appendix 1): No Has the application been subject to Pre-Application Advice: Yes DC/19/03324 PART ONE – REASON FOR REFERENCE TO COMMITTEE The application is referred to committee for the following reason/s: It is a major application for in excess of 15 residential dwellings. PART TWO – POLICIES AND CONSULTATION SUMMARY Summary of Policies Mid Suffolk Local Plan 1998 GP1: Design and Layout of Development HB1: Protection of Listed Buildings HB14: Ensuring archaeological remains are not destroyed H3: Housing development in villagesH13: Design and layout of housing developmentH14: A range of house types to meet different accommodation needs H15: Development to reflect local characteristics H16: Protecting existing residential amenity CL8 Protecting wildlife habitatsT10 Highway considerations in development T11 Facilities for pedestrians and cyclists RT4 Amenity open space and play areas within residential development SC5 Areas at risk of flooding Mid Suffolk Core Strategy 2008 CS1: Settlement hierarchy CS2: Development in the countryside and countryside villages CS3: Reduce contributions to climate change CS5: Mid Suffolk’s environment Mid Suffolk Core Strategy Focussed Review 2012 FC1: Presumption in favour of sustainable development FC1.1: Mid Suffolk approach to delivering Sustainable Development Stowmarket Area Action Plan 2013 SAAP Policy 4.2: Providing a Landscape Setting for Stowmarket SAAP Policy 6.2: Land Adjoining Paupers Graves, Union Road, Stowmarket SAAP Policy 6.6: Development Briefs SAAP Policy 6.7: Paupers Graves SAAP Policy 6.9: Transport - buses / cycle / walking SAAP Policy 6.12 Infrastructure Delivery Programme (IDP) SAAP Policy 9.1:Biodiversity Measures SAAP Policy 9.5: Historic Environment The Emerging Babergh and Mid Suffolk Joint Local Plan (JLP) Babergh and Mid are currently preparing a Joint Local Plan which, if adopted, will replace the current Development Plan policies and set out a strategy for the growth of Babergh and Mid Suffolk up to 2036. The JLP will include land allocations and development management policies to inform the determination of planning applications. Details of the JLP insofar as it relates to the proposal are set out in the assessment below in order to provide context to the direction of travel of the council’s strategic policies. The JLP is currently out for a 6 week pre submission consultation (Regulation 19) on the legal compliance and soundness of the Plan after which it will be submitted to the Secretary of State (Regulation 22) which is expected during winter 2020/21. The progress of the JLP towards adoption is material to the weight it is afforded in the determination of planning applications as an emerging policy document. A verbal update on the status of the JLP will be given at the Committee meeting. Neighbourhood Plan Status This application site is not within a Neighbourhood Plan Area. Housing Land Supply position Mid Suffolk have recently published an updated housing land supply position demonstrating a supply of 7.67 years. This is material to the weight afforded to the relevant Development Plan policies as discussed in the assessment below. Consultations and Representations During the course of the application Consultation and Representations from third parties have been received. These are summarised below. NB: The application was originally submitted with two alternative proposals (A and B). Scheme B has been withdrawn from the proposal during the course of determination. Consultation and representation comments may make reference to two separate proposals, A and B. Summary of Consultations Parish Council (Appendix 3) Onehouse Parish Council Object The SAAP is the adopted document for planning applications in the Stowmarket area. This site was considered reserve and not part of the main plan. The first review of the SAAP has not been undertaken but the numbers proposed have already been given permission. Policy documents identify Onehouse as a secondary village appropriate for infill development to meet local needs only. Visually Important Open Space policies apply. Gaps between Stowmarket and Onehouse should be reinforced whilst allowing public access. The Rat river valley needs protection to maintain its attractive character. SAAP policies seeks to ensure provision of open space and protection of the open character of the area including protection of the Paupers Graves. Paupers Graves is a VIOP (sic). This development would harmfully effect the value of this space. The council has always accepted the concerns of Haughley and Onehouse for their loss of identity and their need for continued separation from Stowmarket. There have been 8000 planning applications considered by MSDC. The fact these have not been built suggests that demand for housing is unproven. Covid will result in recession meaning that the need for housing will not change in the foreseeable future. Development of the adjacent site has resulted in localised flooding on Finborough Road. Starhouse Lane has not been incorporated into highways planning for connectivity of this proposal with the countryside. Increased traffic on an already overloaded country lane will be detrimental. Stowmarket Town Council Recognise that the site has been allocated for residential development for some time. Wish to see the site developed in a sustainable and sympathetic manner. Prefer to see a mixed development including care home provision to enable the greatest social and economic benefits. The local environment should be protected. The site requires comprehensive water management. The narrowness of Union Road and Starhouse Lane are a concern. Traffic management and calming measures are recommended. Agree that the type and mix of housing should respond to housing need in the area. Concern regarding the capacity of local amenities and infrastructure. Combs Parish Council Neither support or oppose. It is probably that any negative impacts on Onehouse would cascade into neighbouring parishes including Combs. Question the need for development Believe the land is declared as reserve and ask MSDC to assess the impact of recent development to determine if this would be sustainable in the area and with the existing infrastructure. Concerns regarding impact of traffic on Combs Lane and Combs Ford. There has often been severe flooding on Combs Lane. National Consultee (Appendix 4) Anglian Water: • Assets are within / close to the site which will affect site layout. • There is not currently capacity to treat the waste water from the development but AW are obligated to accept waste water from developments with permission so would ensure there is sufficient capacity if permission is granted. • The sewerage system has capacity for expected used water flows from the development. • The preference for surface water disposal is SuDS. • Informative notes recommended. Environment Agency: • No comments Internal Drainage Board: • Proposed discharge of surface water to the River Rat is not the responsibility of the IDB but the EA. Mid Suffolk Disability Forum: • Mid Suffolk Disability forum wish to see the dwellings comply with Building Regs for accessibility. • At least one dwelling should be wheelchair accessible and 35% should be bungalows. • Footways should be wide enough for wheelchair use. Natural England: • No objection. NHS: • Both proposals would have an impact on funding for healthcare. • Object to option B as unsustainable effect on primary care in the area. • Impacts of option A expected to be addressed through developer contribution. • No objection to option A. • Further information to explain impact of scheme B. Suffolk Wildlife Trust: • Holding objection initially but resolved. • . Further comments on additional information: • Surveys are satisfactory. • Mitigation measures should be implemented. • No objection. County Council Responses (Appendix 5) Archaeology: • The site lies in an area of archaeological potential. • No grounds for refusal but conditions recommended to secure investigation. Developer Contributions: • The development must be planned comprehensively with the adjacent site to secure a better outcome for the locality and ensure pedestrian and cyclist connectivity. • Details of contribution requirements. • Revised education costs provided. Fire and Rescue: • Hydrants are required. • Must comply with Building Regs. Flood and Water Management after Further comments on additional information: • Submitted information meets policy requirements • Approve subject to conditions. Highways: • Further footway improvements
Recommended publications
  • September 2019
    Haughley and Wetherden Parish News SEPTEMBER 2019 ~1869 to 2019~ PALMERS BAKERY HAUGHLEY ‘CELEBRATING 150 YEARS OF PALMERS BAKERY’ TRADITIONAL HIGH CLASS FAMILY BAKERS & CONFECTIONERS Bread Van loaded for deliveries 1928 with Harry Rutherford © Palmers (Haughley) Limited FRESH BREAD & CONFECTIONERY BAKED DAILY BY CRAFTSMEN USING LOCAL INGREDIENTS & BAKED IN ANCIENT BRICK OVENS 01449 673286 The Village Green~ Haughley Largest Stockist of Tiptree Jams & Marmalades in East Anglia. Suffolk Honey, Free Range Eggs, Groceries & Local Produce. Freshly Made Sandwiches & Filled Rolls - Hot Drinks & Bacon Rolls Also at Stowmarket, Woolpit, Stanton, Ipswich and Brett’s Bakery Needham Market & Freshfills of Claydon 150 Years of Tradition, Service & Baking 2 NOTE FROM EDITOR: Welcome to the September issue of the Parish News. Children are back to school and the summer holidays seem like a distant memory. Weather wasn’t too bad, quite a mixture. There are lots of events to look forward to this month. We have film nights at the Village Hall and this month it’s “Sleepless In Seattle “and if you think those grey cells an airing, the Royal British Legion have their annual Quiz Night. For those of you who feel energetic there’s the annual Suffolk Historic Churches Bike Ride. If you are considering acquiring a new skill there’s Zumba, country dancing, Salsa and Clog dancing and carpet bowls, to name but a few! But if you just want to chat you might consider a conversation round a fire. Finally, I must mention Kieron Palmer and thank him for such a fantastic fun day he hosted for the Village in June.
    [Show full text]
  • STOWMARKET SOUTH ELECTORAL DIVISION PROFILE 2017 This Division Comprises Stowmarket Central and Stowmarket South Wards
    STOWMARKET SOUTH ELECTORAL DIVISION PROFILE 2017 This Division comprises Stowmarket Central and Stowmarket South wards www.suffolkobservatory.info © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance Survey 100023395 CONTENTS . Demographic Profile: Age & Ethnicity . Economy and Labour Market . Schools & NEET . Index of Multiple Deprivation . Health . Crime & Community Safety . Additional Information . Data Sources 3 ELECTORAL DIVISION PROFILES: AN INTRODUCTION These profiles have been produced to support elected members, constituents and other interested parties in understanding the demographic, economic, social and educational profile of their neighbourhoods. We have used the latest data available at the time of publication. Much more data is available from national and local sources than is captured here, but it is hoped that the profile will be a useful starting point for discussion, where local knowledge and experience can be used to flesh out and illuminate the information presented here. The profile can be used to help look at some fundamental questions e.g. Does the age profile of the population match or differ from the national profile? . Is there evidence of the ageing profile of the county in all the wards in the Division or just some? . How diverse is the community in terms of ethnicity? . What is the impact of deprivation on families and residents? . Does there seem to be a link between deprivation and school performance? . What is the breakdown of employment sectors in the area? . Is it a relatively healthy area compared to the rest of the district or county? . What sort of crime is prevalent in the community? A vast amount of additional data is available on the Suffolk Observatory www.suffolkobservatory.info The Suffolk Observatory is a free online resource that contains all Suffolk’s vital statistics; it is the one‐stop‐shop for information and intelligence about Suffolk.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal Decision Inquiry Held on 23-25 and 29-31 July 2019 Site Visit Made on 31 July 2019
    Appeal Decision Inquiry Held on 23-25 and 29-31 July 2019 Site visit made on 31 July 2019 by P W Clark MA(Oxon) MA(TRP) MRTPI MCMI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision date: 13 August 2019 Appeal Ref: APP/W3520/W/18/3214324 Poplar Hill, Stowmarket IP14 2EJ • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant outline planning permission. • The appeal is made by Gladman Developments Ltd against the decision of Mid Suffolk District Council. • The application Ref DC/18/02380, dated 25 May 2018, was refused by notice dated 26 September 2018. • The development proposed is the erection of up to 160 dwellings with public open space, landscaping and sustainable drainage system (SuDS) and vehicular access point from Poplar Hill. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Procedural Matters 2. The application was made in outline form with all matters reserved except for access. Details of appearance, landscaping, layout and scale are therefore not considered in this decision. Main Issues 3. Following agreements between the Council and the appellant, issues relating to archaeology and effects on the Combs Wood SSSI have fallen away. The six main remaining issues are; • The effect of the proposal on the landscape character and appearance of the area • The effect of the proposal on the setting of St Mary’s Church, Combs, a Grade 1 listed building • Whether harm would result from the failure to develop as open space the part of the site allocated for that purpose in the development plan • Whether the site is in a location which is, or can be made, sustainable • The effects of the proposal on the capacity of the highway network and road safety • The effect of the proposal on the supply of housing in the locality.
    [Show full text]
  • February-Ohsmag-2021
    OHSMag February 2021 520 Editors Notes Well it’s like groundhog day all over again as once more we are in lockdown and unfortunately we are not producing a printed magazine in order to protect our volunteer distributors from the virus. I hope you will all bear with us during these difficult times. It is available on the Onehouse website www.onehouse.org.uk and on the Onehouse Parish Council Facebook page. Since our last edition we have had high winds, rain, floods and snow, typical of our British winter and this changeable weather hasn’t made it any easier for those of us sticking to the rules. It’s made it hard for people to venture out for even the shortest of walks, just to get fresh air but I know that a lot of you have managed it. Northfield Wood has been an absolute quagmire especially where all the heavy machinery has left deep ruts which soon filled with water. I hope something will be done about the flooding in Forest Road, especially near the first Northfield turn. It has got worse since the ditch was dug out and the gulley widened, making it difficult for those people living close by. On a lighter note, it’s staying light later, the bulbs are all coming through and Spring will soon be upon us. Hopefully we will all be getting out into our gardens doing all those little jobs that need doing and importantly getting plenty of fresh air. It never ceases to amaze me how people come together in a crisis and one great example of that is the food donations that have been coming in for the food bank, arranged by the Good Neighbours Scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • East Suffolk Catchment Flood Management Plan Summary Report December 2009 Managing Flood Risk We Are the Environment Agency
    East Suffolk Catchment Flood Management Plan Summary Report December 2009 managing flood risk We are the Environment Agency. It’s our job to look after your environment and make it a better place – for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are making your environment cleaner and healthier. The Environment Agency. Out there, making your environment a better place. Published by: Environment Agency Kingfisher House Goldhay Way, Orton Goldhay Peterborough PE2 5ZR Tel: 08708 506 506 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. December 2009 Introduction I am pleased to introduce our summary of the East Suffolk Catchment Flood Management Plan (CFMP). This CFMP gives an overview of the flood risk in the East Suffolk catchment and sets out our preferred plan for sustainable flood risk management over the next 50 to 100 years. The East Suffolk CFMP is one of 77 CFMPs for England Tidal flooding can occur within rivers and estuaries. and Wales. Through the CFMPs, we have assessed inland There is a significant risk of tidal flooding in East Suffolk flood risk across all of England and Wales for the first because the coastal land and land around the estuaries is time. The CFMP considers all types of inland flooding, low-lying. Tidal flooding can occur from the River Gipping from rivers, ground water, surface water and tidal in the ports, docklands and some areas of Ipswich.
    [Show full text]
  • 31 Stowmarket South
    STOWMARKET SOUTH ELECTORAL DIVISION PROFILE 2021 This Division comprises part of St Peter’s, Combs Ford and Chilton Wards www.suffolkobservatory.info © Crown copyright and database rights 2021 Ordnance Survey 100023395 CONTENTS ▪ Demographic Profile: Age & Ethnicity ▪ Economy and Labour Market ▪ Schools & NEET ▪ Index of Multiple Deprivation ▪ Health ▪ Crime & Community Safety ▪ Additional Information ▪ Data Sources 3 ELECTORAL DIVISION PROFILES: AN INTRODUCTION These profiles have been produced to support elected members, constituents and other interested parties in understanding the demographic, economic, social and educational profile of their neighbourhoods. We have used the latest data available at the time of publication. Much more data is available from national and local sources than is captured here, but it is hoped that the profile will be a useful starting point for discussion, where local knowledge and experience can be used to flesh out and illuminate the information presented here. The profile can be used to help look at some fundamental questions e.g. • Does the age profile of the population match or differ from the national profile? • Is there evidence of the ageing profile of the county in all the wards in the Division or just some? • How diverse is the community in terms of ethnicity? • What is the impact of deprivation on families and residents? • Does there seem to be a link between deprivation and school performance? • What is the breakdown of employment sectors in the area? • Is it a relatively healthy area compared to the rest of the district or county? • What sort of crime is prevalent in the community? A vast amount of additional data is available on the Suffolk Observatory www.suffolkobservatory.info The Suffolk Observatory is a free online resource that contains all Suffolk’s vital statistics; it is the one-stop-shop for information and intelligence about Suffolk.
    [Show full text]
  • Buxhall Broadcast
    Diary Dates for May 2014 2 May Pudding Evening p 25 Buxhall 3 May Parish Supper p 23 3—5 May Harleston Flower Festival p 23 4 May Fairtrade Stall p 31 Broadcast 7 May FHOBS Coffee Morning p 19 8 May Onehouse Table Tennis p 11 8 May Gardening Club p 27 11 May Plodders & Ploughman's p 24 11—17 May Christian Aid Week p 22 15 May Buxhall Broadcast deadline for June p 4 17 May Coffee Morning and flower demonstration p 11 21 May Women’s Institute p 5 22 May Onehouse Table Tennis p 11 22 May Candlestick Club p 15 25 May Onehouse Ramblers p 5 27 May FHOBS Lunch Club 29 May Onehouse Table Tennis p 11 Diary Dates for June 2014 1 June Fairtrade Stall p 32 6—8 June Buxhall Flower Festival p 9 7 June Men’s Breakfast p 13 15 June Buxhall Broadcast deadline for July/August May 2014 19 June Candlestick Club p 15 32 Church services in the benefice for May 2014 Priest in Charge: The Revd Chris Childs, Combs Rectory, 135 Poplar Hill, Stowmarket IP14 2AY 01449 673280 Associate Priest: The Revd Liz Law, Sunnyside, The Green, Gt Finborough IP14 3AB 01449 774878 4 May: Easter 3, Second Sunday after Easter Acts 2:14a, 36-41, Psalm 116:1-4, 12-19, 1 Peter 1:17-23, Luke 24:13-35 . Ivy Friston &DeniseIvy Friston Biles John&Lavinia &Barbara Mike Chatt -- Ling &Gill Ivy Friston 9.00 am Holy Communion Barbara Little Finborough Sidesman 9.30 am Sung Eucharist Chris Buxhall 9.30 am Reflective Morning Prayer Derek Shelland 10.00 am George Ward Memorial Service Arlene Onehouse Church 11.00 am Holy Communion Barbara Great Finborough 11.00 am All Age Worship Chris Combs
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Council Landscape Guidance August 2015
    Joint Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Council Landscape Guidance August 2015 Joint Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Council Landscape Guidance 2015 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The landscape of Babergh and Mid Suffolk (South and North Suffolk) is acknowledged as being attractive and an important part of why people choose to live and work here. However current pressures for development in the countryside, and the changing agricultural and recreational practices and pressures, are resulting in changes that in some instances have been damaging to the local character and distinctiveness of the landscape. 1.1.1 Some development is necessary within the countryside, in order to promote a sustainable prosperous and vibrant rural economy. However, such development would be counterproductive if it were to harm the quality of the countryside/landscape it is set within and therefore the quality of life benefits, in terms of health and wellbeing that come from a rural landscape in good condition.1 1.1.2 The Council takes the view that there is a need to safeguard the character of both districts countryside by ensuring new development integrates positively with the existing character. Therefore, a Landscape Guidance has been produced to outline the main elements of the existing character and to outline broad principles that all development in the countryside will be required to follow. 1.1.3 Well designed and appropriately located development in the countryside can capture the benefits of sustainable economic development whilst still retaining and enhancing valuable landscape characteristics, which are so important to Babergh and Mid Suffolk. 1.1.4 The protection and enhancement of both districts landscape is essential not only for the intrinsic aesthetic and historic value that supports tourism and the economy for the area but also to maintain the quality of life for the communities that live in the countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • Childcare Sufficiency Assessment (CSA) December 2019 – December 2020
    Childcare Sufficiency Assessment (CSA) December 2019 – December 2020 Suffolk County Council Early Years and Childcare Service December 2019 Page 2 of 89 CONTENTS Table of Contents COVID – 19 5 1. Overall assessment and summary 5 England picture compared to Suffolk 6 Suffolk contextual information 6 Overall sufficiency in Suffolk 7 Deprivation 7 How Suffolk ranks across the different deprivation indices 8 2. Demand for childcare 14 Population of early years children 14 Population of school age children 14 3. Parent and carer consultation on childcare 15 4. Provision for children with special educational needs and disabilities 18 Number of children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) 18 5. Supply of childcare, Suffolk picture 20 Number of Early Years Providers 20 All Providers in Suffolk - LOP and Non LOP 20 Number of school age providers and places 21 6. Funded early education 22 Introduction to funded early education 22 Proportion of two year old children entitled to funded early education 22 Take up of funded early education 22 Comparison of take up of funded early education 2016 -2019 23 7. Three and four-year-old funded entitlement – 30hrs 24 30 hr codes used in Suffolk 25 Table 8 25 8. Providers offering funded early education places and places available. 26 Funded early education places available 26 Early education places at cluster level 28 9. Hourly rates 31 Hourly rate paid by Suffolk County Council 31 Hourly rate charged by providers 31 Mean hourly fee band for Suffolk 31 December 2019 Page 3 of 89 10. Quality of childcare 32 Ofsted inspection grades 32 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Ref No Top 40 Coll. Transferred from Ipswich Record Office Title Date
    Ref_No Top 40 Transferred Title Date Digitisation status Collections that could be coll. from Ipswich accessed in LRO after 2020 Record Office Top 40 One of the top 40 collections accessed by researchers during 2016/17 i.e. more than 5 productions the collection during the year Transferred Originally the whole collection or part of it held at Ipswich Record Office & transferred to Lowestoft Record Office 1 Yes LOWESTOFT BOROUGH RECORDS 1529-1975 3 OULTON BROAD URBAN DISTRICT COUNCIL 1904-1920 4 COLBY FAMILY FISHING RECORDS 1911-1978 5 LOWESTOFT DEEDS 1800 - 2000 7 GEORGE GAGE AND SON, HORSE CAB PROPRIETOR OF LOWESTOFT 1874-1887 8 STANNARD LOGS 1767-1812 9 PAPERS OF MARY ANN STANNARD nd 12 DIARIES OF LADY PLEASANCE SMITH 1804 -1843 13 LOWESTOFT CENSUS ENUMERATORS NOTEBOOKS 1821-1831 14 WILLIAM YOUNGMAN, WINE AND SPIRIT MERCHANT OF LOWESTOFT 1863-1865 15 ARNOLD SHIP LOGS 1729 - 1782 DECLARATIONS OF OWNERSHIP OF THE 'MEUM AND TUUM' OF 16 LOWESTOFT 1867-1925 Future digital access via 17 TITHE RECORDS 1837-1854 National project partner website JOHN CHAMBERS LTD, SHIPBUILDERS AND MARINE ENGINEERS OF 18 LOWESTOFT 1913-1925 19 WANGFORD RURAL DISTRICT COUNCIL RECORDS 1894-1965 20 HALESWORTH URBAN DISTRICT COUNCIL 1855-1970 21 Yes WAINFORD RURAL DISTRICT COUNCIL 1934-1969 22 Transferred BUNGAY URBAN DISTRICT COUNCIL 1875-1974 Proposed future digital 23 Yes Transferred PORT OF LOWESTOFT SHIPS' LOGS AND CREW LISTS 1863-1914 Proposed access 24 Yes Transferred PORT OF LOWESTOFT FISHING BOAT AGREEMENTS 1884-1914 On-going Future digital access 25 Yes Transferred PORT OF LOWESTOFT SHIPPING REGISTERS 1852-1946 Planned Future digital access 26 LOWESTOFT ROTARY CLUB 1962-1980 Proposed future digital 27 Transferred LOWESTOFT VALUATION DISTRICT - VALUATION LISTS 1929-1973 Proposed access 33 Yes WAVENEY DISTRICT COUNCIL 1917-2011 Ref_No Top 40 Transferred Title Date Digitisation status Collections that could be coll.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Finborough Newsletter
    GREAT FINBOROUGH VILLAGE DIARY – OCTO BER 20 10 NEWSLETTER 4 6pm Brownies, Primary School 6 tba WI Group meeting, Stowupland Village Hall 7 12.15pm Ladies Lunch, Church Room 7 2pm Candlestick Club, Buxhall Village Hall 7 7pm Youth Club, Pettiward Hall 8 6.30pm Beetledrive, Onehouse Church Room 11 6pm Brownies, Primary School 14 4.30pm Skylarks, Onehouse Church Room 14 7.30pm Garden Club meeting, Pettiward Hall 14 7pm Youth Club, Pettiward Hall 15 7.30pm Spectacular Shopping Evening, Stow Rugby Club 16 6.30pm Autumn Supper, Pettiward Hall 18 6pm Brownies, Primary School 18 7.30pm Community Council, Pettiward Hall 20 7.30pm Buxhall Women’s Institute 21 6.30pm Charity Bingo, Pettiward Hall 26 12.30pm FHOBS lunch, Buxhall Village Hall 30 6pm Fancy Dress Disco, Pettiward Hall VILLAGE DIARY – NOVEM BER 2010 1 7.30pm Parish Council, Pettiward Hall 10 2pm Candlestick Club, Buxhall Village Hall 20 7.30pm Quiz Night, Pettiward Hall ST JOHN’S TABLE TENNIS Thursday Nights 7.30-9.30pm in the Church Room: 14 and 28 October 2010 Why not try a bit of gentle exercise with a game of Table Tennis? New and experienced players welcome; especially young people. £1 per session. Give me a ring for further details. Derek Ames (613328) OCTOBER 2010 The Newsletter is produced by Great Finborough Parish Council, ISSUE 412 printed by Gipping Press, and distributed to all households in the village free of charge 2 Editorial News from the Parish Council My call to villagers to express strong opinions last month had some Meeting of the Council – September 2010 results.
    [Show full text]
  • Stowmarket INT: Place-Based Needs Assessment (2020)
    Stowmarket INT: Place-Based Needs Assessment (2020) Main authors Tom Delaney, Alliance JSNA Researcher Alison Matthews, Senior JSNA researcher Main editors Natacha Bines, Head of Population Insight Anna Crispe, Head of Knowledge & Intelligence Consultant reviewers Dr Padmanabhan Badrinath, Consultant in Public Health Medicine Dr Jeptepkeny Ronoh, Consultant in Public Health Medicine With many thanks to Integrated Neighbourhood Team colleagues and wider Suffolk colleagues for their input, collaboration and consultation. This is version 2 created on 1st November 2020 Word accessibility Please contact the Knowledge and Intelligence Team at Public Health Suffolk if you require a word accessible copy of this Place Based Needs Assessment. Public Health Suffolk Page 2 of 110 Stowmarket INT: Place-Based Needs Assessment (2020) Contents Executive summary .................................................................................................................................. 5 Demographics ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Wider determinants of health ............................................................................................................. 6 Primary care ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Hospital admissions ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]