Antimicrobial Activity of Purified Toxins from Crossopriza Lyoni (Spider) Against Certain Bacteria and Fungi
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Short Term Somatic Cell Culture Approach for Cytogenetic Analysis of Crossopriza Lyoni (Spider: Pholcidae)
International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research (IJETR) ISSN: 2321-0869, Volume-2, Issue-8, August 2014 Short term somatic cell culture approach for cytogenetic analysis of Crossopriza lyoni (Spider: Pholcidae) Anjali, Sant Prakash successfully harvest metaphase plates for Cytogenetical Abstract— Crossopriza lyoni (Daddy long leg) a typical analysis of C. lyoni from Agra. representative of the family Pholcidae is a spider commonly found in Agra region. The diploid chromosome number of C.lyoni (2n=24) with meta and sub-metacentric groups of II. MATERIAL AND METHODS chromosome were recorded. Two exceptionally large XX is found in female while the males have single X type. The male A. Spider collection: chromosome was further confirmed through NOR-Ag staining by presence of single Interphasic nuclei in male. The Somatic Pholcids were collected from the agriculture fields of Agra Cell Culture approach in the current study on C. lyoni spider by regular visual searching and Hand collection method9 cytogenetic is a convenient technique over the existing practice of repeated sacrifices of spiders and may have various other B. Spider Identification:- applications in the field of biotechnology. The present data is Pholcids were identified first through keys and catalogues also being reported for the first time on C. lyoni of Agra region. and confirmed by book records of Indian Spider10-11and also through personal communication with Arachnologists. Index Terms— Spider, Pholcidae, Cytogenetic, C. Cell Culture Protocol:- Chromosomes, Somatic cell culture, Agra. The protocol was inspired from the existing protocol on water mites as proposed by12 and little modification on the protocol gave good cell growth. -
Biodiversity and Community Structure of Spiders in Saran, Part of Indo-Gangetic Plain, India
Asian Journal of Conservation Biology, December 2015. Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 121-129 AJCB: FP0062 ISSN 2278-7666 ©TCRP 2015 Biodiversity and Community structure of spiders in Saran, part of Indo-Gangetic Plain, India N Priyadarshini1*, R Kumari1, R N Pathak1, A K Pandey2 1Department of Zoology, D. A. V. College, J. P. University, Chhapra, India 2School of Environmental Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India (Accepted November 21, 2015) ABSTRACT Present study was conducted to reveals the community structure and diversity of spider species in different habitat types (gardens, crop fields and houses) of Saran; a part of Indo – Gangetic Plain, India. This area has very rich diversity of flora and fauna due to its climatic conditions, high soil fer- tility and plenty of water availability. The spiders were sampled using two semi-quantitative methods and pitfall traps. A total of 1400 individual adult spiders belonging to 50 species, 29 genera and 15 families were recorded during 1st December 2013 to 28th February 2014. Spider species of houses were distinctive from other habitats it showed low spider species richness. The dominant spider fami- lies were also differs with habitat types. Araneidae, Pholcidae and Salticidae were the dominant spi- der families in gardens, houses and crop fields respectively. Comparison of beta diversity showed higher dissimilarity in spider communities of gardens and houses and higher similarity between spi- der communities of crop fields and gardens. We find that spiders are likely to be more abundant and species rich in gardens than in other habitat types. Habitat structural component had great impact on spider species richness and abundance in studied habitats. -
Checklist of the Spider Fauna of Bangladesh (Araneae : Arachnida)
Bangladesh J. Zool. 47(2): 185-227, 2019 ISSN: 0304-9027 (print) 2408-8455 (online) CHECKLIST OF THE SPIDER FAUNA OF BANGLADESH (ARANEAE : ARACHNIDA) Vivekanand Biswas* Department of Zoology, Khulna Government Womens’ College, Khulna-9000, Bangladesh Abstract: Spiders are one of the important predatory arthropods that comprise the largest order Araneae of the class Arachnida. In Bangladesh, very few contributions are available on the taxonomic study on these arachnids. The present paper contains an updated checklist of the spider fauna of Bangladesh based on the published records of different workers and the identified collections of the recent studies by the author. It includes a total of 334 species of spiders belong to the infraorders Mygalomorphae and Araneomorphae under 21 families and 100 genera. A brief diagnosis of different families and their domination together with the distribution throughout the country are provided herewith. Key words: Checklist, spiders, Araneae, Arachnida, Bangladesh INTRODUCTION Bangladesh is basically a riverine agricultural country. It lies between 20.35ºN and 26.75ºN latitude and 88.03ºE and 92.75ºE longitude, covering an area of 1,47,570 sq. km (55,126 sq. miles). The country as such offers varied climatic situations viz., temperature, rainfall, humidity, fogmist, dew and Haor- frost, winds etc. (Rashid 1977). With the vast agricultural lands, also there are different kinds of evergreen, deciduous and mangrove forests staying different areas of the country viz., the southern Sunderbans, northern Bhawal and Madhupur forests and eastern Chittagong and Chittagong Hill-Tracts forest. Along with the agricultural lands, each of the forest ecosystems is composed of numerous species of spider fauna of the country. -
SA Spider Checklist
REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region. -
Description of a New Cave-Dwelling Pholcid Spider from North-Western Australia, with an Identification Key to the Genera of Australian Pholcidae (Araneae)
~~~~~~~~~~~~---~~~---~~~~~~~~- _ _--- Ree. West. Aus/. Mus. 1993 16(3): 323-329 DESCRIPTION OF A NEW CAVE-DWELLING PHOLCID SPIDER FROM NORTH-WESTERN AUSTRALIA, WITH AN IDENTIFICATION KEY TO THE GENERA OF AUSTRALIAN PHOLCIDAE (ARANEAE) CL Deeleman-Reinhold* ABSTRACT A new species of cave-dwelling pholcid spider is described. Trichocyclus septentrionalis sp.nov. was collected in various caves in North West Cape, northern Western Australia; it does not show troglobitic features in its morphology and was also fOWld outside caves. The genus Trichocyclus is diagnosed and differences with related genera are indicated. The type species, T. nigropunctaJus Simon, 1908, is redescribed. An identification key to all pholcid genera ofAustralia is presented. INTRODUCTION Scientific exploration ofthe Australian cavefauna has been relatively recent. Such explorations have revealed a rich spider fauna associated with caves in many parts ofsouthern Australia (Gray 1973a,b; Main 1976) and more recently in Chillagoe caves and Undara lava tubes. A specialised cave spider fauna was recorded and partly described by Main (1969), Gray (1973a) and Main and Gray (1985). Cavesin limestonesofdifferentgeologicalages in Western Australiaharbourspiders (Watson, et al. 1990). In recent years the Western Australian Museum has conducted extensive surveys of caves in the Cape Range, North West Cape, Western Australia (Humphreys 1991). Nevertheless muchofthe cavespiderfauna ofAustraliaremains undescribed. Thepholcid spiders collected in North West Cape belong to one species only. They do not exhibit any morphological cave-adaptations such as reduction of eye size or pigmentation; the environment may however have effected a lengthening of the legs. The following abbreviations are used: AME, PME: anterior, posterior median eyes; ALE, PLE: anterior, posterior lateral eyes; MNHN: Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris; RMNH: Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden; ZMH: Zoologisches Museum, Ham burg. -
Arthropods and the Current Great Mass Extinction: Effective Themes to Decrease Arthropod Fear and Disgust and Increase Positive Environmental Beliefs in Children?
International Journal Journal of Environmental of Environmental & Science & Educat Scienceion Education (2014), 9, 197-214 Vol. 3, No. 3, July 2008, xx-xx Arthropods and the Current Great Mass Extinction: Effective Themes to Decrease Arthropod Fear and Disgust and Increase Positive Environmental Beliefs in Children? Amy Wagler The University of Texas at El Paso Ron Wagler The University of Texas at El Paso Received 16 October 2013; Accepted 14 February 2014 Doi: 10.12973/ijese.2014.211a Earth is experiencing a great mass extinction (GME) that has been caused by the environmentally destructive activities of humans. This GME is having and will have profound effects on Earth’s biodiversity if environmental sustainability is not reached. Activities and curriculum tools have been developed to assist teachers in integrating the current GME theme into their existing curriculum. There has also been a recent appeal to incorporate the current GME theme into science and environmental education research but this research has yet to be conducted. This study presents the first time the current GME theme has been assessed in a research setting. This study analyzed the effect living Poecilotheria spider activities had on United States children. The variables measured included 1) human fear toward the Poecilotheria spiders; 2) human disgust toward the Poecilotheria spiders; and 3) human environmental beliefs associated with the current GMEs impact on the Poecilotheria spiders. New to this study is the finding that the use of living spiders in a positive educational setting that addresses the current GME are effective tools in decreasing fear and disgust and increasing positive environmental beliefs toward Poecilotheria spiders in children. -
What Is the Diversity of Sub-Canopy Web Building Spiders in Three Separate Regions of Puerto Rico?
Cantaurus, Vol. 23, 21-27, May 2015 © McPherson College Department of Natural Science What is the Diversity of Sub-Canopy Web Building Spiders in Three Separate Regions of Puerto Rico? Nathaniel D. Schowengerdt ABSTRACT Understanding the many aspects of the biodiversity of our planet yields many positive advancements in the conservation and maintenance of its current and future states. This experiment seeks to explore the more intricate facets of this by sampling and comparing the diversity of web building spider species in three separate areas of the island of Puerto Rico. The island is known for its diversity, despite its relatively small size, about 100 by 35 miles. Ecosystems vary from temperate moist forests, to rainforest, to desert and dry forest, just within that space. Several methods of sampling were attempted and evaluated for their efficiency in each environment, but due to difficulties with some methods and a need for standardization for comparisons, only the visual sampling technique was deemed as successful in this case. Specimens were identified down to the classifications of family and genus through identification of morphological structures, as well as other defining traits. After identification, relationships and comparisons were made within and between the areas, and further analysis using Simpson’s Index and Community Similarity Index was utilized. It was determined that based off of this collection, the Guanica site housed the greatest diversity in specimens, although there were several similar specimens found in all three of the areas. This may imply the distribution of some types of spiders may be affected by ecological factors that differ in each of the areas, such as resource and habitat availability. -
List of Authors/Collectors/Illustrators of Virginia Spiders
Banisteria, Number 41, pages 51-58 © 2013 Virginia Natural History Society History of Araneology in Virginia Barbara J. Abraham Department of Biological Sciences Hampton University Hampton, Virginia 23668 ABSTRACT At least from the 1600s to the present, spiders have been observed, collected, and studied in Virginia. This paper endeavors to outline the history of araneology in Virginia from its inception through the first decade of the 21st century, including researchers of spiders at Virginia institutions and those who have studied Virginia spiders. Key words: araneology, history, spiders, Virginia. INTRODUCTION planning a Natural History of Virginia (Lewis, 1957). Instead, “Some Observations concerning Insects made The study of spiders in Virginia has a venerable by Mr. John Banister in Virginia, A.D. 1680” was history, beginning in the 17th century and continuing to published by Petiver (Banister & Petiver, 1701). the present. Through the efforts of natural historians, Banister was the first to systematically describe any of entomologists, and ecologists, we know much about the spiders of North America; not until between 1791 these important arachnids, but distributions and even and 1802 did John Abbot draw the spiders of Carolina the presence of some species in Virginia remain to be and Georgia (Ewan & Ewan, 1970). discovered. In the 20th and 21st centuries, quantitative, Lack of proper attribution by Martin Lister (a 17th manipulative studies have increasingly replaced century physician and natural historian), who received anecdotal observations, and spiders are used as model Banister’s specimens in 1680 and data for illustrations organisms to address ecological and evolutionary by Petiver, kept Banister’s Virginia specimens from hypotheses. -
Pholcid Spider Molecular Systematics Revisited, with New Insights Into the Biogeography and the Evolution of the Group
Cladistics Cladistics 29 (2013) 132–146 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2012.00419.x Pholcid spider molecular systematics revisited, with new insights into the biogeography and the evolution of the group Dimitar Dimitrova,b,*, Jonas J. Astrinc and Bernhard A. Huberc aCenter for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; bDepartment of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA; cForschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany Accepted 5 June 2012 Abstract We analysed seven genetic markers sampled from 165 pholcids and 34 outgroups in order to test and improve the recently revised classification of the family. Our results are based on the largest and most comprehensive set of molecular data so far to study pholcid relationships. The data were analysed using parsimony, maximum-likelihood and Bayesian methods for phylogenetic reconstruc- tion. We show that in several previously problematic cases molecular and morphological data are converging towards a single hypothesis. This is also the first study that explicitly addresses the age of pholcid diversification and intends to shed light on the factors that have shaped species diversity and distributions. Results from relaxed uncorrelated lognormal clock analyses suggest that the family is much older than revealed by the fossil record alone. The first pholcids appeared and diversified in the early Mesozoic about 207 Ma ago (185–228 Ma) before the breakup of the supercontinent Pangea. Vicariance events coupled with niche conservatism seem to have played an important role in setting distributional patterns of pholcids. Finally, our data provide further support for multiple convergent shifts in microhabitat preferences in several pholcid lineages. -
The Pholcid Spiders of Micronesia and Polynesia (Araneae, Pholcidae)
Butler University Digital Commons @ Butler University Scholarship and Professional Work - LAS College of Liberal Arts & Sciences 2008 The pholcid spiders of Micronesia and Polynesia (Araneae, Pholcidae) Joseph A. Beatty James W. Berry Butler University, [email protected] Bernhard A. Huber Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/facsch_papers Part of the Biology Commons, and the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Beatty, Joseph A.; Berry, James W.; and Huber, Bernhard A., "The pholcid spiders of Micronesia and Polynesia (Araneae, Pholcidae)" Journal of Arachnology / (2008): 1-25. Available at https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/facsch_papers/782 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences at Digital Commons @ Butler University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarship and Professional Work - LAS by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Butler University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The pholcid spiders of Micronesia and Polynesia (Araneae, Pholcidae) Author(s): Joseph A. Beatty, James W. Berry, Bernhard A. Huber Source: Journal of Arachnology, 36(1):1-25. Published By: American Arachnological Society DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1636/H05-66.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1636/H05-66.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. -
Vitex Rotundifolia
SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS 45 Banisteria, Number 36, page 45 A search of the swimming pool room revealed a © 2010 Virginia Natural History Society significant, established population of C. lyoni. We observed several mature females, a mature male, and THE TAILED CELLAR SPIDER, CROSSOPRIZA many juveniles of various instars. The females and LYONI (BLACKWALL 1867), NEW TO VIRGINIA juveniles were in large, loosely organized sheet webs (ARANEAE: PHOLCIDAE). — A population of an that were distinct from the tangled webs of co-occurring unusual-looking pholcid spider was initially observed P. phalangioides. In the pool area, only three by one of us (TC) around the overhead door of an individuals of P. phalangioides were seen, suggesting indoor swimming pool in Kirby Athletic Center on the that in this local context, C. lyoni may have been out- campus of Hampden-Sydney College, Hampden- competing it. Sydney, Virginia. A single female was collected and Our new record of C. lyoni and those from other later identified as Crossopriza lyoni (Blackwall 1867). North American sites demonstrate that this species can This species has not been recorded previously from colonize buildings and survive well away from the Virginia, and has been found in North America only in tropics. For our population, the high humidity and Texas, Florida, Louisiana (Edwards, 1993), and Kansas temperature maintained in the swimming pool (Guarisco & Cutler, 2003), making our collection the duplicated the wet tropical environment in the spider’s first for the northeastern United States as well. native land. However, we suspect that C. lyoni is much VIRGINIA: Prince Edward Co. Hampden-Sydney more widespread and more adaptable than current College, swimming pool facility, Kirby Athletic Center, records indicate. -
Norntates PUBLISHED by the AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST at 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10024 Number 3262, 10 Pp., 17 Figures May 4, 1999
AMERICANt MUSEUM Norntates PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10024 Number 3262, 10 pp., 17 figures May 4, 1999 The Spider Genus Crossopriza (Araneae, Pholcidae) in the New World BERNHARD A. HUBER,1 CHRISTA L. DEELEMAN-REINHOLD,2 AND ABEL PEREZ-GONZALEZ3 ABSTRACT Crossopriza Simon, 1893 (Pholcidae) is a predominantly Old World spider genus with only a few records from the New World. The present paper reevaluates the New World records, and shows that C. lyoni (Blackwall, 1867), a synanthropic spider, has been recorded under several different names in various parts of the world and is the only unequivocal species in the New World. New junior synonyms of C. lyoni are C. brasiliensis Mello-Leitao, 1935, from Brazil; C. mucronata Mello-Leitao, 1942, from Argentina; and C. francoisi Millot, 1946, and C. stridulans Millot, 1946, from Madagascar. We present a detailed redescription and several new records for C. lyoni. The Argentine C. saltensis Mello-Leitao, 1941, is newly synony- mized with Priscula binghamae (Chamberlin, 1916). INTRODUCTION supposedly have representatives both in the New and Old Worlds. Huber (1998b) argued It has been argued recently that pholcid that most representatives of Old World phol- spiders are quite strictly separated into two cid genera in the New World may be mis- groups, one better represented in the Old placed or introduced. A major source of con- World (and possibly monophyletic), the other fusion is the fact that previous authors often one more diverse in the New World (Brig- did not publish the habitat, especially wheth- noli, 1981; Huber, 1998b).