Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Chikusetsusaponin Ⅳa butyl ester (CS-Ⅳa-Be), a novel IL-6R antagonist, inhibits IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway and induces cancer cell apoptosis Jie Yang 1, 2, Shihui Qian 2, Xueting Cai 1, 2, Wuguang Lu 1, 2, Chunping Hu 1, 2, * Xiaoyan Sun1, 2, Yang Yang1, 2, Qiang Yu 3, S. Paul Gao 4, Peng Cao 1, 2
1. Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210028, China 2. Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Jiangsu Province Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210028, China 3. Shanghai Institute of Materia Medical, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201203, China 4. Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY10065, USA Running title: CS-Ⅳa-Be, a novel IL-6R antagonist, inhibits IL-6/STAT3 Keywords: Chikusetsusaponin Ⅳ a butyl ester (CS- Ⅳ a-Be), STAT3, IL-6R, antagonist, cancer Grant support: P. Cao received Jiangsu Province Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists (BK20140049) grant, J. Yang received National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81403151) grant, and X.Y. Sun received National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81202576) grant. Corresponding author: Peng Cao Institute: Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Jiangsu Province Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210028, Jiangsu, China Mailing address: 100#, Shizi Street, Hongshan Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China Tel: +86-25-85608666 Fax: +86-25-85608666 Email address: [email protected] The first co-authors: Jie Yang and Shihui Qian The authors disclose no potential conflicts of interest.
1
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Abbreviations
IL-6: Interleukin 6; STAT: Signal transducer and activator of transcription; GP130:
Glycoprotein 130; IL-6Rα: Interleukin 6 receptor alpha; LIFR: Leukemia inhibitory
factor receptor; LeptinR: Leptin receptor; TRAIL: Tumor necrosis factor
(TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand; DR: Death receptor; LIF: Leukemia
inhibitory factor; OSM: Oncostatin M; JAK: Janus kinase; c-FLIP: cellular
FLICE-like inhibitory protein; Bcl-xL: B-cell lymphoma-extra large; Mcl-1: Myeloid
cell leukemia 1; IAP: Inhibitor of apoptosis protein; MTT: Methyl thiazolyl
tetrazolium; TNF-α: Tumor necrosis factor alpha; EGF: Epidermal growth factor;
IFN-γ: Interferon gamma; SDS-PAGE: Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis; PVDF: polyvinylidene fluoride; GM-CSF: Granulocyte-macrophage
colony-stimulating factor; NF-κB: Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of
activated B cells; ROS: Reactive oxygen species; TYK2: Tyrosine kinase 2; EGFR:
Epidermal growth factor receptor; IGF1R: Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor;
PDGFRα: Platelet-derived growth factor receptor α; FGFR: Fibroblast growth factor
receptor; ELISA: Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; EMSA: Electrophoretic
mobility shift assay; MST: Microscale thermophoresis; JNK: c-Jun N-terminal kinase;
ERK: Extracellular signal-regulated kinases; PARP: Poly ADP ribose polymerase;
MAPK: Mitogen-activated protein kinase; TNF-α: Tumor necrosis factor alpha;
PTPase: Protein tyrosine phosphatase; XIAP: X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis.
2
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Abstract
The activation of interleukin-6 (IL-6)/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3
(STAT3) signaling is associated with the pathogenesis of many cancers. Agents that
suppress IL-6/STAT3 signaling have cancer therapeutic potential. In this study, we
found that chikusetsusaponin Ⅳa butyl ester (CS-Ⅳa-Be), a triterpenoid saponin
extracted from Acanthopanas gracilistylus W.W.Smith, induced cancer cell apoptosis.
CS-Ⅳa-Be inhibited constitutive and IL-6-induced STAT3 activation, repressed
STAT3 DNA binding activity, STAT3 nuclear translocation, IL-6-induced STAT3
luciferase reporter activity, IL-6-induced STAT3 regulated anti-apoptosis genes
expression in MDA-MB-231 cells and IL-6-induced TF-1 cell proliferation.
Surprisingly, CS-Ⅳa-Be inhibited IL-6 family cytokines rather than other growth
factors induced STAT3 activation. Further studies indicated that CS-Ⅳa-Be is an
antagonist of IL-6 receptor via directly binding to the IL-6Rα with a Kd of 663±74
nM and the GP130 (IL-6Rβ) with a Kd of 1660±243 nM, interfering the binding of
IL-6 to IL-6R (IL-6Rα and GP130) in vitro and in cancer cells. The inhibitory effect
of CS-Ⅳa-Be on the IL-6-IL-6Rα-GP130 interaction was relatively specific as
CS-Ⅳa-Be showed higher affinity to IL-6Rα than to LIFR (Kd: 4990±915 nM) and
LeptinR (Kd: 4910±1240 nM). We next demonstrated that CS-Ⅳa-Be not only
directly induced cancer cell apoptosis but also sensitized MDA-MB-231 cells to
TRAIL-induced apoptosis via up-regulating DR5. Our findings suggest that
CS-Ⅳa-Be as a novel IL-6R antagonist inhibits IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway and
sensitizes the MDA-MB-231 cells to TRAIL induced cell death.
3
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Introduction
Interleukin 6 (IL-6) is a pleiotropic cytokine mediating cancer associated chronic
inflammation and inflammatory response, plays important roles in the tumorigenesis
(1). IL-6 possesses three topologically distinct receptor binding sites: site 1 for
binding to the 80 kDa chain IL-6Rα, and sites 2 and 3 for interacting with the two
subunits of the signaling chain glycoprotein 130 (GP130). The IL-6 signaling
transduces after the homodimerization of GP130, which becomes associated with
IL-6-binding chain (IL-6Rα) in the presence of IL-6. (2). As a common receptor,
GP130 also transduces signals delivered by the leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), the
IL-11, the oncostatin M (OSM) and the others (3).
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), the key factor mediating
the IL-6-induced signaling becomes tyrosine phosphorylated by IL-6 induced
cytokine receptor-associated kinases, the Janus kinase (JAK) family proteins (4). The
IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway mediates tumor immune suppression (5), tumor cell
survival, pre-metastatic niche formation and chemotherapy resistance (6).
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy and the primary cause of
cancer-related death in women worldwide (7). IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling plays a
critical and pharmacologically targetable role in orchestrating the composition of the
breast tumor microenvironment that promotes cancer cell growth, invasion and
metastasis (8) (9). Increasing clinical data have indicated that the circulating levels of
4
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
IL-6 in breast cancer patients correlate with clinical tumor stage and poor prognosis.
IL-6 plays two distinct roles in breast cancer: the systemic IL-6, reflecting whole body
metabolic and inflammatory status, is correlated with poor prognosis, advanced
disease and metastasis; the paracrine and autocrine IL-6 signaling controls cancer cell
growth, cancer stem cell renewal and metastasis (10) (11). In summary, the IL-6
mediated excessive STAT3 activation plays important roles in breast cancer.
Inhibitors of the IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway should be effective against the
cancers with high levels of STAT3 activation. As a matter of fact, JAK3 inhibitor
tofacitinib (12, 13) and IL-6Rα monoclonal antibody tocilizumab (14) have been used
in clinical trial. However, no natural IL-6/STAT3 inhibitory compound has been used
in cancer clinical trial. Identifying novel compounds that suppress the JAKs signaling
or antagonize IL-6R is a pressing issue to prevent and treat the cancers with aberrant
activated IL-6/STAT3 signaling.
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a
promising target for cancer therapy because it preferentially induces cancer cell
apoptosis with little or no effects on normal cells (15). However, some highly
malignant cancers, including breast cancer, (16) are resistant to TRAIL induced
apoptosis. The resistance of cancer cells to TRAIL occur at various points of the
TRAIL signaling pathways, dysfunctions of the death receptors DR4 and DR5, over
expression of cellular FLICE-like inhibitory protein (c-FLIP), B-cell lymphoma-extra
5
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
large (Bcl-xL), Myeloid cell leukemia 1 (Mcl-1) and the inhibitor of apoptosis
proteins (IAP) all lead to TRAIL resistance (17). TRAIL resistance can occur through
activating STAT3 in cancer cells (18). Therefore, a combination of TRAIL with
STAT3 inhibitor may prove to be a sound strategy to overcome the resistance.
Identifying novel agents that inhibit STAT3 activation not only can directly induce
apoptosis but also sensitize cancer cells to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis.
CS-Ⅳa-Be (Fig. 1A), a triterpenoid saponin extracted from a traditional Chinese
medicine (TCM) herb Acanthopanas gracilistylus W.W.Smith, exhibits
immunomodulation (19) and antithrombotic effects (20). The pharmacological effects
of CS-Ⅳa-Be have not been reported yet. In this study, we demonstrated that as an
IL-6R antagonist, CS-Ⅳa-Be inhibited IL-6/STAT3 signaling, repressed cancer cell
growth and synergized with TRAIL to induce breast cancer cell apoptosis.
Materials and Methods
Cell lines and cultures Human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells, human hepatocellular cancer
HepG2 and MHCC97L cells, cervical cancer Hela cells, leukemic U937 and TF-1
cells, gastric cancer SGC-7901 cells were purchased from Cell Bank of the Shanghai
Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology in June 2013, Human fetal liver cell line
LO2 was purchased from Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of
Sciences in June 2013. All cell lines had been authenticated by provider through short
tandem repeat (STR) profiling. All cell lines were preserved in liquid N2 after receipt
6
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
and passaged for fewer than 6 months when we use them to do experiments. The cell
lines were last tested in June 2013 by above cell bank through STR profiling.
MDA-MB-231, MCF-7 and HepG2 cells were cultured in MEM medium
supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS). Hela and MHCC97L cells were
cultured in DMEM media (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10 % fetal
bovine serum (FBS) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). U937, SGC-7901 and LO2 cells
were cultured in RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 10 % FBS, TF-1 cells were
cultured in RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 10 % FBS and 2 ng/mL GM-CSF.
All cell lines were cultured in a humidified atmosphere with a 5 % CO2 incubator at
37 °C.
Agents and antibodies
CS- Ⅳ a-Be was identified and purified from the fruit of the Acanthopanar
gracilistμlusW.W.Smith, the purity of CS-Ⅳa-Be is 98.8 %, which was determined by
HPLC-ELSD method. A 20 mM solution of CS-Ⅳa-Be was prepared in dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO), stored as small aliquots at 4 °C. STAT3, phospho-STAT3 (Tyr705),
phosphor-STAT1(Tyr701), STAT1, phosphor-STAT5(Tyr694), STAT5,
phosphor-ERK1/2(Thr201/Tyr204), ERK1/2, phosphor-AKT(Ser473), AKT,
phosphor-JAK1(Tyr1022/1023), phosphor-JAK2(Tyr1007/1008), phosphor-Src(Tyr416),
Bcl-xL, Mcl-1, Survivin, XIAP, Caspase-3, Caspase-8, Caspase-9, PARP, DR5, DR4,
c-FLIP, IL-6Rα, GAPDH antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology
(MA, USA). Anti-IL-6 and anti-GP130 antibodies were purchased from
Abcam((Massachusetts, US). IL-6 ELISA kit purchased from R&D system (MN,
USA). His-probe, NE-PER® Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction and LightShift 7
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Chemiluminescent EMSA kit were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (CA,
USA). MTT (methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium), NAC(N-acetyl-L-cysteine), SP600125,
PD98059, SB203580 and Z-VAD-FMK were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (MO,
USA). Recombinant human TNF-α, IL-6, EGF, IFN-γ were obtained from Tocris
Bioscience (Bristol, UK). Recombinant human IL-6Rα, GP130, LIFR and Leptin
receptor were purchased from Sino biological inc (Beijing, China). PierceTM Classic
Magnetic IP/Co-IP Kit were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (MA, USA)
Immunoblot Assay
Cells were plated in six-well plate at a density of 5 × 106 cells/mL overnight before
being treated with CS-Ⅳa-Be. The total cell lysates were prepared as previously
described (21). The equal amounts of proteins from each sample were subjected to
sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) followed by
transfer to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes. After being blocked with 1%
(w/v) albumin from bovine serum (BSA) in TBST for 2 h, the membranes were
incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4 °C then washed and incubated with
secondary antibody conjugated with IgG DyLightTM for 1 h at room temperature.
Afterwards, membranes were washed and scanned with an Odyssey infrared
fluorescent scanner (LI-COR) and analyzed with Odyssey software version 3.
Cytotoxicity Assay
LO2, HepG2, MHCC97L, SGC-7901, TF-1, U937, MDA-MB-231, MCF-7 cells were
8
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
plated in triplicate in a 96-well plate at a density of 1 × 104 cells with 100 μL culture
medium per well in the absence or presence of indicated concentrations of CS-Ⅳa-Be
for 24 h. Cell viability was then determined by the MTT assay as described earlier
(22).
Apoptosis Assay Apoptotic cells were determined by using an FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection
Kit (BD Biosciences, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The cells were
washed and incubated with binding buffer containing Annexin V-FITC and PI in the
dark at room temperature for 15 min. Afterwards, the degree of apoptosis was
analyzed by FACScan laser flowcytometer (FACS Calibur, Becton Dickinson, USA).
The data were analyzed using the software CELLQuest.
JC-1 staining
Mitochondrial membrane potential was examined via JC-1 staining (Beyotime
Institute of Biotechnology, China). MDA-MB-231 cells were incubated with JC-1
working solution at 37°C in the dark for 20 min and observed by fluorescence
microscopy. In healthy cells, JC-1 forms complexes of J-aggregates showing punctate
red fluorescence at 590nm emission wavelength; however in apoptotic cells, JC-1
remains in the monomeric form showing diffused green fluorescence at 530nm
emission wavelength.
Immunofluorescence staining
MDA-MB-231 cells were seeded at the density of 70 ~ 80 % confluence per well into
9
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
24-well chamber slides. After being treated with test drugs for the indicated times,
cells were fixed with cold 4 % (w/v) paraformaldehyde for 20 min, rehydrated in PBS
for 15 min, and permeabilized in 0.1 % (w/v) TritonX-100 at room temperature for 10
min. After being washed with PBS, the cells were blocked with 3 % BSA for 1 hour
and then incubated with primary antibody at 4 °C overnight followed by
FITC-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. The images green
fluorescence stained pSTAT3 were captured using a fluorescence microscope.
Luciferase reporter gene activity assay
We used the luciferase reporter assay (the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System,
Promega, UK) to investigate the IL-6-induced transcriptional activity of STAT3.
Transient transfection was performed in 96-well plates at a cell density of 50% ~ 70%
confluence per well. The STAT3 luciferase reporter plasmid was co-transfected with
the pRL-TK plasmid (which encodes Renilla luciferase as an internal control for
transfection efficiency) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA)
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The transfected cells were treated with
CS-Ⅳa-Be for various periods of time, and the cell lysates were prepared for
assessment of luciferase activity. Firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were
measured using a luminometer (Centro XS3 LB960, Berthold, Germany) according to
the manufacturer’s instructions. Relative firefly luciferase activity normalized by
Renilla luciferase activity was expressed as fold induction after treatment with CS-Ⅳ
a-Be compared with vehicle control (DMSO).
10
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA) STAT3-DNA binding activity was analyzed by EMSA using biotin-labeled,
double-stranded STAT3 consensus-binding motif probe. STAT3 consensus oligo:
5'-GATCCTTCTGGGAATTCCTAGATC-3',3'-CTAGGAAGACCCTTAAGGATCT
AG-5'. Nuclear protein extracts were prepared from CS- Ⅳ a-Be treated
MDA-MB-231 cells and incubated with biotin-labeled probe. STAT3-DNA complex
was separated from free oligonucleotide on 5 % nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels,
then transferred to nylon membranes, and cross-linked for 15 min under a hand-held
UV lamp. Cross-linked, biotin-labeled DNA was detected using the
Chemiluminescent Nucleic Acid Detection Module (Pierce Biotechnology, inc).
IL-6 inhibitory bioassay
After being starved in media without GM-CSF for 24 h, various concentrations of CS-
Ⅳa-Be (2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5) μM in the presence of IL-6 (25 ng/ml) were added to the
TF-1 cells and incubated for 24 or 48 h, cell viability was then determined by the
MTT assay.
In vitro kinase assay
In vitro JAKs kinase (JAK2, JAK3, TYK2) assay for a series of CS-Ⅳa-Be
concentrations was performed by BPS Bioscience Service using Kinase-Glo Plus
luminescence kinase assay kit (Promega). In vitro panel kinases (JAK1, JAK2, JAK3,
TYK2, EGFR, IGF1R, PDGFRα, FGFR1) assay with two concentrations (25 μM and
11
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
50 μM) of CS-Ⅳa-Be was performed by Eurofins’ Kinase Profiler service according
to Cerep’s validation Standard Operating Procedure.
IL-6 receptor binding assay in cell level
The cell-based IL-6-receptor binding was performed using the kit of Fluorokine®
Biotinylated Human Interleukin 6 (R&D Systems) followed by the manufacturer’s
protocol. Firstly, U937, MDA-MB-231, Hela and HepG2 cells were treated with the
test compound for various periods of time and the cells were harvested and washed
twice with PBS to remove any residual growth factors that may be present in the
culture media. Next, the cells were resuspended in PBS to a final concentration of 4×
106 cells/mL, 10 μL of biotinylated IL-6 was added to a 25 μL aliquot of the cell
suspension for a total reaction volume of 35 μL. As a negative staining control, an
aliquot of cells were stained with 10 μL of negative control reagent (a soybean trypsin
inhibitor protein biotinylated as the IL-6). The cells were then incubated for 30 min at
4 °C followed by the addition of 10 μL Avidin-FITC reagent and another 30 min
incubation at 4 °C in the dark before being analyzed by flow cytometry.
Analysis of IL-6Rα, DR4 and DR5 surface expression
Cells were treated with CS-Ⅳa-Be for various periods of times before being detached
with EDTA and washed twice with staining buffer. Cells were then incubated with
mouse monoclonal anti-human DR5, DR4 or IL-6Rα antibodies for 45 min at 4 °C,
washed twice, incubated with FITC-conjugated secondary antibody for 30 min at 4 °C
12
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
and washed again, then re-suspended in staining buffer for flow cytometric analysis.
IL-6 receptor binding assay in vitro
IL-6 receptor binding was performed following the method described earlier (23).
Briefly, Ninety-six well-plates (Nunc) were coated with 500 ng/mL of human
recombinant soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R), washed and blocked. The sIL-6R coated
96-well plates were incubated with 6.2 nM of recombinant human IL-6, or 6.2 nM
IL-6 plus one of six concentrations of CS-Ⅳa-Be, in triplicates, and washed to
remove unbound IL-6, the wells then were incubated with a monoclonal rabbit
anti-human IL-6 antibody (200 ng/mL), washed and incubated with goat anti-rabbit
IgG-HRP (40 ng/mL, Santa Cruz). Sample wells were washed and developed with
tetramethylbenzidine (100 μL/well, 10 min at RT and stopped with 2 M H2SO4).
Optical density in each well was determined using a microplate reader (Multiskan
Ascent, Thermo) 450 nm with a correction wavelength of 630 nm. Non-specific
binding of IL-6 is determined by the reading of wells without sIL-6R. Data were
analyzed by non-linear regression analysis using GraphPad Prism4 (Graph Pad, San
Diego, CA). Maximum binding of IL-6 (100 % bound) is defined as the absorbance in
the absence of CS-Ⅳa-Be. The absorbance in the presence of various concentrations
of CS-Ⅳa-Be is calculated as percent of maximum binding of IL-6.
Microscale Thermophoresis (MST) assay
Binding assay of labeled recombinant human IL-6Rα, GP130, LIFR, and LeptinR to
13
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
CS-Ⅳa-Be was performed using the Monolith NT.115 kit (NanoTemper
Technologies, Germany). Briefly, 10 μM recombinant human IL-6Rα, GP130, LIFR,
and LeptinR were labeled in PBS buffer using the Protein Labeling Kit RED-NHS
followed by the manufacturer’s protocol (NanoTemper Technologies, Germany). A
16-point titration series of CS-Ⅳa-Be were added to the labeled protein (200 nM) in
PBST buffer (PBS + 0.05 % Tween-20), the total volume of mixed sample was 20 μL
and the volume ratio of CS-Ⅳa-Be to labeled protein is 1:1, the final DMSO
concentration for each protein-compound sample was 2 %. The protein-compound
samples were equilibrated for 5 min at room temperature, loaded into the MST
Premium Coated capillaries (NanoTemper Technologies, Germany) and assayed by
MST. The thermophoresis data was analyzed using NT Analysis 1.5.41 (NanoTemper
Technologies, Germany) to compute Kd value according to the law of mass action.
The experiment was performed in triplicate, and the fits are represented as mean ± SD.
Data normalization and curve fitting were performed using GraphPad Prism 5.
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay
The interaction of IL-6Rα with GP130 in the presence of IL-6 was assayed by Co-IP
assay according to the manufacturer’s protocol of PierceTM Classic Magnetic IP/Co-IP
Kit. At room temperature, 10 μg of recombinant human IL-6Rα was pre-incubated
with 0, 5 or 10 μM of CS-Ⅳa-Be for 2 h in IP wash buffer, added 10 μg of
recombinant human IL-6 and GP130 incubation for another 2 h, then added 2 μg of
His antibody and incubated for 2 h to form immune complex. Place 25 μL of
14
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
pre-washed Pierce Protein A/G Magnetic Beads into the above immune complex and
incubated for 1 h with mixing. Then the beads were washed and the target antigen was
eluted with Alternative Elution, the target antigen and binding proteins were
immuno-blotted with indicated antibodies by western blot assay.
Small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated Gene Silencing
DR5 specific siRNA was obtained from RiboBio (Guangzhou, China). Transient
transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 2000. Briefly, cells were transfected
with indicated concentration of siRNAs for 24 h, followed by treatment with CS-Ⅳ
a-Be for indicated time, the cells were then harvested for flow cytometry analysis.
Data analysis
The experimental results presented in the figures are representative of three or more
independent experiments. The data are presented as the mean values ± standard error.
Statistical comparisons between the groups were done using one-way analysis of
variance. Values of P < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Results
CS-Ⅳa-Be induces cancer cell apoptosis
CS- Ⅳ a-Be (Fig. 1A), a triterpenoid saponin extracted from Acanthopanas
gracilistylus W.Smith, was identified as a cell death inducer. We investigated the
effects of CS-Ⅳa-Be on the viability of cancer cells and found that CS-Ⅳa-Be
15
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
inhibits the viability of various kinds of cancer cells (including hepatocellular, gastric,
leukemia and breast cancers). Breast cancer MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells were
more sensitive to the CS-Ⅳa-Be-induced cell viability attenuation than other cancer
cells (Fig. 1B). We next investigated whether the CS-Ⅳa-Be-induced breast cancer
cell inhibition due to apoptosis. We then found that CS-Ⅳa-Be induced pro-Caspase 3,
8 and 9 cleavage (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, Z-VAD-FMK, a pan-Caspase inhibitor,
significantly offset the CS-Ⅳa-Be-induced MDA-MB-231 cell viability attenuation
and apoptosis (Fig. 1D and E). In addition, CS-Ⅳa-Be induced a decrease of
mitochondrial membrane potential (Fig. 1F). The results indicate that CS-Ⅳa-Be
promotes breast cancer cell apoptosis.
CS-Ⅳa-Be selectively inhibits constitutive and IL-6 family member-induced
STAT3 activation in MDA-MB-231 cells
To identify the signaling pathways that were involved in the CS-Ⅳa-Be-induced cell
apoptosis, we investigated the effects of CS-Ⅳa-Be on STAT3, (nuclear factor
kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B) NF-κB, Mitogen-activated protein kinase
(MAPK) and AKT signaling. CS-Ⅳa-Be was found to inhibit the constitutive and
IL-6-induced STAT3 and JAK1, JAK2, Src activation rather than constitutive and
IL-6-induced ERK1/2 and AKT activation (Fig. 2A and B). Other IL-6 family
cytokines (IL-11, LIF and OSM , which share the same GP130 receptor to transducer
signal) induced STAT3 activation was also inhibited by CS-Ⅳa-Be (Fig. 2C). But
interestingly, constitutive and EGF-induced STAT3, STAT5 activation or
16
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
IFN-γ-induced STAT3, STAT1 activation were not inhibited by CS-Ⅳa-Be (Fig. 2A
and D). In addition, ROS production was observed upon CS-Ⅳa-Be treatment
(Supplementary Fig. S1A), but treatment with ROS, c-Jun N-terminal
kinase (JNK1/2/3), extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK1/2) or p38 specific
inhibitor did not reverse the CS- Ⅳ a-Be-induced cell viability attenuation in
MDA-MB-231 cells (Supplementary Fig. S1B). CS-Ⅳa-Be had no inhibitory effects
on the TNF-α-induced NF-κB transcription activity (Supplementary Fig. S1C) and
NF-κB-DNA binding activity (Supplementary Fig. S1D).
CS-Ⅳa-Be abrogates IL-6/STAT3 downstream signaling
We further investigated the effects of CS-Ⅳa-Be on constitutive and IL-6-induced
STAT3 downstream signaling in MDA-MB-231 cells. CS-Ⅳa-Be was found to
inhibit the pSTAT3 nuclear translocation (Fig. 3A), the STAT3-DNA binding activity
(Fig. 3B), IL-6 induced STAT3 luciferase activity (Fig. 3C) in MDA-MB-231 cells.
CS-Ⅳa-Be also down-regulated the constitutive and IL-6-induced Survivin, XIAP,
Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 expression (Fig. 3D and E). IL-6 induced TF-1 cell proliferation
was also inhibited by CS-Ⅳa-Be (Fig. 3F). These findings suggest that CS-Ⅳa-Be
inhibit IL-6/STAT3 downstream signaling.
CS-Ⅳa-Be doses not inhibit the enzyme activity of non-receptor or receptor
tyrosine kinases of STAT3 in vitro
As STAT3 phosphorylation was mediated by several non-receptor tyrosine kinases
17
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
(24) and receptor kinases (25). We investigated whether CS-Ⅳa-Be impact the
activity of upstream kinases. CS-Ⅳa-Be has showed inhibitory effects on the
IL-6-induced phosphorylation of JAK1, JAK2 and Src (Fig. 2B) in MDA-MB-231
cells. The inhibitory effect of CS-Ⅳa-Be on IL-6-induced STAT3 activation might be
through its repression on JAK1, JAK2 and Src kinase activity. However, by in vitro
kinase assay, we found no inhibitory effect of CS-Ⅳa-Be on the enzyme activity of
tyrosine kinases such as JAKs family kinases (JAK1, JAK2, JAK3 and TYK2) (Fig.
4A and B), Src, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), insulin-like growth factor 1
receptor (IGF1R), platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRα) and fibroblast
growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) (Fig. 4B), even at 50 μM, the drug concentration
much higher than the IC50 of CS-Ⅳa-Be in MDA-MB-231 cells. Therefore, we
suggest that CS-Ⅳa-Be is not a tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
CS-Ⅳa-Be blocks IL-6 binding to its cell surface receptor
We had shown CS-Ⅳa-Be inhibited IL-6-induced JAKs and STAT3 activation in
breast cancer cells, without affecting JAKs enzyme activity in vitro. These findings
made us speculate that CS-Ⅳa-Be might disrupt the upstream signaling such as the
interaction of IL-6 to its receptor. To test this hypothesis, we investigated whether
CS-Ⅳa-Be affect the binding of IL-6 to cell surface IL-6R in cancer cells using
biotin-labled IL-6 by flow cytometry analysis. To rule out the possibility that CS-Ⅳ
a-Be might down-regulate IL-6R protein levels, we also measured the cell surface
IL-6Rα expression upon CS-Ⅳa-Be treatment. The results demonstrated that CS-Ⅳ
18
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
a-Be indeed lowered biotin-labled IL-6 binding to IL-6R in various cancer cells tested
(U937, MDA-MB-231, Hela, HepG2) in a dose dependent manner, without
decreasing IL-6Rα cell surface expression (Fig. 5 A, B and Supplementary Fig. S2).
To further confirm our hypothesis that CS-Ⅳa-Be inhibits IL-6-IL-6R binding, we
investigated the effects of CS-Ⅳa-Be on IL-6-IL-6Rα interaction using an in vitro
ELISA assay. Our results showed that CS- Ⅳ a-Be significantly inhibited the
IL-6/IL-6Rα interaction with maximal inhibition rate less than 20 % (Fig. 5C). As CS-
Ⅳa-Be can not antagonize IL-6-IL-6Rα interaction completely, we considered CS-Ⅳ
a-Be could be a non-competitive IL-6Rα antagonist.
Biochemical characterization of CS-Ⅳa-Be/ IL-6R interaction
Our results have illustrated that CS-Ⅳa-Be inhibited the IL-6-IL-6R interaction, we
next studied the binding specificity of CS-Ⅳa-Be to IL-6 or IL-6R. We first measured
the binding affinity (Kd: 48 ± 2 nM) of IL-6 to IL-6Rα (Supplementary Fig. S3A)
using microscale thermophoresis (MST) analysis, which allows a sensitive detection
of small-molecule binding to a protein target. Next, we measured the binding
characteristics of CS-Ⅳa-Be to IL-6 or IL-6R and found that CS-Ⅳa-Be can bind to
IL-6Rα (Kd: 663 ± 74 nM) and IL-6Rβ (GP130) (Kd: 1660 ± 243 nM) (Fig. 5D and E)
while had no binding affinity to IL-6 (Supplementary Fig. S3B). The affinity of CS-
Ⅳa-Be to IL-6R was relatively higher than other IL-6 family receptors such as
LeptinR (Kd: 4910 ± 1240 nM) and LIFR (Kd: 4990 ± 915 nM) (Fig. 5E and
19
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Supplementary Fig. S3). IL-6Rα pretreatment with CS-Ⅳa-Be also inhibited
IL-6Rα/GP130 interaction in the presence of IL-6 (Fig. 5F). The expression of IL-6R,
IL-6, pSTAT3 in different cancer cell lines were compared (Supplementary Fig. S4A,
B and C). Since MDA-MB-231 cells secret the highest levels of IL-6 (Supplementary
Fig. S4B), we also considered if CS-Ⅳa-Be could inhibit IL-6 secretion, however,
CS-Ⅳa-Be exhibited little inhibitory effect on IL-6 secretion (Supplementary Fig.
S4D). Overall, these results suggest that CS-Ⅳa-Be binds to IL-6R (IL-6Rα and
GP130) and disrupts IL-6/IL-6Rα/GP130 interaction.
CS-Ⅳa-Be synergized with TRAIL to induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells
Resistance to TRAIL induced apoptosis in many cancers limits its clinical use as an
anticancer agent (26), and aberrant STAT3 activation has been suggested to be part of
the causes(27). We have proved that CS-Ⅳa-Be is an effective IL-6/STAT3 inhibitor,
we next determined whether CS-Ⅳa-Be can synergize with TRAIL to induce
apoptosis in breast cancer cells. We treated the breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells
with CS-Ⅳa-Be alone or combined with TRAIL and analyzed cell apoptosis. The
cells treated by TRAIL/CS-Ⅳa-Be combination demonstrated obvious apoptotic
morphology (Fig. 6A) and increased cell apoptosis (Fig. 6B and C).
CS-Ⅳa-Be up-regulates DR5 synergized with TRAIL
With our data showing CS-Ⅳa-Be activating Caspase-8, we hypothesized that the
death receptor pathways could be involved in the CS-Ⅳa-Be-induced apoptosis. We
20
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
then investigated the effects of CS-Ⅳa-Be on the expression of death receptors and
found that CS-Ⅳa-Be increased DR5 protein levels in breast cancer MDA-MB-231
and MCF-7 cells (Fig. 6D). We next analyzed the cell surface DR5 expression levels
in CS-Ⅳa-Be treated MDA-MB-231 cells, which was also increased upon CS-Ⅳa-Be
treatment. In contrast, the levels of DR4 didn’t increase by CS-Ⅳa-Be (Fig. 6D). It
has previously been suggested that the up-regulation of DR5 synergizes with TRAIL
to induce apoptosis. We then examined whether CS-Ⅳa-Be induced up-regulation of
DR5 synergized with TRAIL. Transfection of MDA-MB-231 cells with DR5 specific
siRNA resulted in a marked inhibition of DR5 surface expression (data not shown).
After the combined treatment with CS-Ⅳa-Be and TRAIL, the apoptosis rate in the
DR5-knocked down cells was significantly reduced compared with the control (Fig.
6E). We suggest that the synergized induction of apoptosis by CS-Ⅳa-Be and TRAIL
was dependent on the DR5 up-regulation, at least partially.
Discussion
CS-Ⅳa-Be, a triterpenoid saponin from TCM Acanthopanas gracilistylus W.W.Smith,
has previously been shown to possess cytotoxic activity in many cancer cells (28)
although the mechanism remains elusive. Herein, we uncovered that CS-Ⅳa-Be
decrease cell viability in various cancer cells by inducing apoptosis. Numerous
signaling pathways, such as IL-6/STAT3, ROS/MAPK, TNF-α/NF-κB and AKT, are
involved in regulating cell proliferation and survival (29, 30). Though CS-Ⅳa-Be
treatment induced ROS production, we demonstrated that oxidative stress is not the
21
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
primary cause for CS-Ⅳa-Be induced cell apoptosis. TNF-α/NF-κB and AKT are also
not involved in CS-Ⅳa-Be mediated cell apoptosis. We next discovered CS-Ⅳa-Be
inhibited IL-6 family cytokines induced STAT3 activation. Especially, CS-Ⅳa-Be
showed more potential inhibitory effect on IL-6 induced STAT3 activation than other
family cytokines (Fig. 2B and C). Interestingly, CS-Ⅳa-Be showed no inhibitory
effect on EGF or IFN-γ induced STAT3, STAT5 or STAT1 activation as well as
constitutive STAT5 or STAT1 activation.
Tyrosine kinases (JAKs, Src, EGFR, FGFR1, IGF1R and PDGFRα) are not involved
in the mechanism of CS-Ⅳa-Be mediated IL-6/STAT3 inhibition cause CS-Ⅳa-Be
showed no inhibitory effect on the enzyme activity of any of the kinases. We further
found that CS-Ⅳa-Be directly binds to IL-6R (IL-6Rα and GP130) and disrupts the
interaction of IL-6/IL-6Rα/GP130 in vitro and in cancer cells. Since CS-Ⅳa-Be
showed higher affinity to IL-6Rα than other IL-6 family receptors (LIFR and
LeptinR), we suggest that CS-Ⅳa-Be is an relatively specific IL-6R antagonist,
interfering IL-6 induced STAT3 activation. In view of the fact that GP130 is a
common subunit of IL-6 family receptors and CS-Ⅳa-Be also can directly bind
GP130, CS-Ⅳa-Be exhibit inhibitory effect on other IL-6 family cytokines (IL-11,
LIF and OSM) induced STAT3 activation. The evidences that U937 cells express
relatively high levels of cell surface IL-6Rα than other cancer cells (Fig. 5A and
Supplementary Fig. S4A) and IL-6Rα knockdown partly reversed the CS-Ⅳa-Be
induced U937 cell apoptosis (Supplementary Fig. S4E and F) also demonstrate the
22
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
key role of IL-6Rα in mediating CS-Ⅳa-Be induced cancer cell apoptosis.
Many kinds of natural compounds have been reported to abolish IL-6/STAT3
signaling through different mechanisms(31) such as targeting IL-6Rα (32) or
GP130(33), directly inhibiting JAKs (34), inducing PTPase expression (35), inhibiting
STAT3 translocation (36) and blocking JAK-STAT3 interaction (37). The natural
antagonist of IL-6R is rarely reported except for the ERBF, which is isolated from
bufadienolide and sensitize breast cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis via
inhibition of STAT3/Mcl-1 pathway (38). In accordance with their results, our data
suggest CS-Ⅳa-Be is a novel natural IL-6R antagonist and shows anti-cancer activity.
To further confirm the inhibitory effect of CS-Ⅳa-Be on cancer cells was via
IL-6/STAT3 inhibition, we investigated the GP130, pSTAT3, STAT3, IL-6 secretion
levels and cell surface IL-6Rα expression in different cancer cells (Supplementary Fig.
S4A, B and C) and compared the sensitivity of different cancer cells to CS-Ⅳa-Be.
MDA-MB-231 cells express the highest levels of GP130, pSTAT3 and IL-6 than
other cancer cells determined MDA-MB-231 cell line is sensitive to CS-Ⅳa-Be. We
found that MCF-7 cell line expresses low level of IL-6 and p-STAT3, but it is also
sensitive to CS-Ⅳa-Be. It has been reported that low level of IL-6 is indispensible to
maintain the growth of MCF-7 breast cancer cells (39). In addition, CS-Ⅳa-Be also
can bind GP130, the expression of GP130 in MCF-7 cells is higher than other cancer
cells except MDA-MB-231. We speculate that MCF-7 cells are more dependent on
23
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
GP130 mediated other IL-6 family cytokines induced signaling to survive and
antagonize GP130 by CS-Ⅳa-Be can effectively inhibit MCF-7 viability.
TRAIL resistance in many cancers limits its therapeutic use in clinical scenarios. The
STAT3 trans-regulated pro-survival genes Survivin, c-FLIP, XIAP, Bcl-xL and Mcl-1
are involved in regulating cell apoptosis and TRAIL sensitivity to cancer cells (40).
The expression levels of these genes were attenuated by CS-Ⅳa-Be, which exhibits
enhanced apoptosis in breast cancer cells via up-regulating DR5 expression, which is
consistent with the report that up-regulation of the cell surface DR5 was dependent on
the suppression of STAT3 activation (41). These studies suggest that DR5 is
negatively regulated by STAT3, inhibition of STAT3 phosphorylation by CS-Ⅳa-Be
accounts for DR5 induction and the apoptosis enhancing synergy with TRAIL.
In summary, we characterized CS-Ⅳa-Be as a novel natural IL-6R antagonist, that
inhibits IL-6/STAT3 signaling, induces cancer cell apoptosis and synergizes with
TRAIL in breast cancer cells. Therefore, synergistic combination of CS-Ⅳa-Be with
TRAIL has potential to be a more effective strategy to treat cancers with aberrant
IL-6/STAT3 activation.
Acknowledgement We thank Xiaojun Xu and Ping Zhou in State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicine
(China Pharmaceutical University) for providing us with the help for MST analysis.
24
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
References
1. Rattigan Y, Hsu JM, Mishra PJ, Glod J, Banerjee D. Interleukin 6 mediated recruitment of mesenchymal stem cells to the hypoxic tumor milieu. Experimental cell research. 2010;316:3417-24. 2. Kishimoto T, Akira S, Taga T. Interleukin-6 and its receptor: a paradigm for cytokines. Science. 1992;258:593-7. 3. Kishimoto T, Taga T, Akira S. Cytokine signal transduction. Cell. 1994;76:253-62. 4. Schindler C, Levy DE, Decker T. JAK-STAT signaling: from interferons to cytokines. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2007;282:20059-63. 5. Ferguson SD, Srinivasan VM, Heimberger AB. The role of STAT3 in tumor-mediated immune suppression. Journal of neuro-oncology. 2015;123:385-94. 6. Spitzner M, Ebner R, Wolff HA, Ghadimi BM, Wienands J, Grade M. STAT3: A Novel Molecular Mediator of Resistance to Chemoradiotherapy. Cancers. 2014;6:1986-2011. 7. Place AE, Jin Huh S, Polyak K. The microenvironment in breast cancer progression: biology and implications for treatment. Breast cancer research : BCR. 2011;13:227. 8. Senst C, Nazari-Shafti T, Kruger S, Honer Zu Bentrup K, Dupin CL, Chaffin AE, et al. Prospective dual role of mesenchymal stem cells in breast tumor microenvironment. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2013;137:69-79. 9. Chang Q, Bournazou E, Sansone P, Berishaj M, Gao SP, Daly L, et al. The IL-6/JAK/Stat3 feed-forward loop drives tumorigenesis and metastasis. Neoplasia. 2013;15:848-62. 10. Fuksiewicz M, Kowalska M, Kotowicz B, Rubach M, Chechlinska M, Pienkowski T, et al. Serum soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor type I concentrations independently predict prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine : CCLM / FESCC. 2010;48:1481-6. 11. Dethlefsen C, Hojfeldt G, Hojman P. The role of intratumoral and systemic IL-6 in breast cancer. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2013;138:657-64. 12. Cutolo M, Meroni M. Clinical utility of the oral JAK inhibitor tofacitinib in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of inflammation research. 2013;6:129-37. 13. Vyas D, O'Dell KM, Bandy JL, Boyce EG. Tofacitinib: The First Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The Annals of pharmacotherapy. 2013;47:1524-31. 14. Hashizume M, Tan SL, Takano J, Ohsawa K, Hasada I, Hanasaki A, et al. Tocilizumab, A Humanized Anti-IL-6R Antibody, as an Emerging Therapeutic Option for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Molecular and Cellular Mechanistic Insights. International reviews of immunology. 2015;34:265-79. 15. Walczak H, Miller RE, Ariail K, Gliniak B, Griffith TS, Kubin M, et al. Tumoricidal activity of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in vivo. Nature medicine. 1999;5:157-63. 16. Rahman M, Pumphrey JG, Lipkowitz S. The TRAIL to targeted therapy of breast cancer. Advances in cancer research. 2009;103:43-73. 17. Zhang LD, Fang BL. Mechanisms of resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis in cancer. Cancer Gene Ther. 2005;12:228-37. 18. Chen KF, Tai WT, Liu TH, Huang HP, Lin YC, Shiau CW, et al. Sorafenib overcomes TRAIL resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma cells through the inhibition of STAT3. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2010;16:5189-99. 19. Spelman K, Burns J, Nichols D, Winters N, Ottersberg S, Tenborg M. Modulation of cytokine expression by traditional medicines: a review of herbal immunomodulators. Alternative medicine
25
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
review : a journal of clinical therapeutic. 2006;11:128-50. 20. Chen XC, Xia L, Hu S, Huang G. Inhibitory effects of Acanthopanax gracilistylus saponins on human platelet aggregation and platelet factor 4 liberation in vitro. Zhongguo yao li xue bao = Acta pharmacologica Sinica. 1996;17:523-6. 21. Isomoto H, Mott JL, Kobayashi S, Werneburg NW, Bronk SF, Haan S, et al. Sustained IL-6/STAT-3 signaling in cholangiocarcinoma cells due to SOCS-3 epigenetic silencing. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:384-96. 22. Takada Y, Ichikawa H, Badmaev V, Aggarwal BB. Acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid potentiates apoptosis, inhibits invasion, and abolishes osteoclastogenesis by suppressing NF-kappa B and NF-kappa B-regulated gene expression. J Immunol. 2006;176:3127-40. 23. Vardanyan M, Melemedjian OK, Price TJ, Ossipov MH, Lai J, Roberts E, et al. Reversal of pancreatitis-induced pain by an orally available, small molecule interleukin-6 receptor antagonist. Pain. 2010;151:257-65. 24. Imada K, Leonard WJ. The Jak-STAT pathway. Molecular immunology. 2000;37:1-11. 25. Song LX, Turkson J, Karras JG, Jove R, Haura EB. Activation of Stat3 by receptor tyrosine kinases and cytokines regulates survival in human non-small cell carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2003;22:4150-65. 26. Dimberg LY, Anderson CK, Camidge R, Behbakht K, Thorburn A, Ford HL. On the TRAIL to successful cancer therapy? Predicting and counteracting resistance against TRAIL-based therapeutics. Oncogene. 2013;32:1341-50. 27. Lanuti P, Bertagnolo V, Pierdomenico L, Bascelli A, Santavenere E, Alinari L, et al. Enhancement of TRAIL cytotoxicity by AG-490 in human ALL cells is characterized by downregulation of cIAP-1 and cIAP-2 through inhibition of Jak2/Stat3. Cell Res. 2009;19:1079-89. 28. Wang J, Lu J, Lv C, Xu T, Jia L. Three new triterpenoid saponins from root of Gardenia jasminoides Ellis. Fitoterapia. 2012;83:1396-401. 29. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646-74. 30. Sung B, Park B, Yadav VR, Aggarwal BB. Celastrol, a triterpene, enhances TRAIL-induced apoptosis through the down-regulation of cell survival proteins and up-regulation of death receptors. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2010;285:11498-507. 31. Sansone P, Bromberg J. Targeting the interleukin-6/Jak/stat pathway in human malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1005-14. 32. Hayashi M, Rho MC, Fukami A, Enomoto A, Nonaka S, Sekiguchi Y, et al. Biological activity of a novel nonpeptide antagonist to the interleukin-6 receptor 20S,21-epoxy-resibufogenin-3-formate. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 2002;303:104-9. 33. Hong SS, Choi JH, Lee SY, Park YH, Park KY, Lee JY, et al. A Novel Small-Molecule Inhibitor Targeting the IL-6 Receptor beta Subunit, Glycoprotein 130. J Immunol. 2015;195:237-45. 34. Wang Y, Ma X, Yan S, Shen S, Zhu H, Gu Y, et al. 17-hydroxy-jolkinolide B inhibits signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 signaling by covalently cross-linking Janus kinases and induces apoptosis of human cancer cells. Cancer research. 2009;69:7302-10. 35. Yang J, Cai X, Lu W, Hu C, Xu X, Yu Q, et al. Evodiamine inhibits STAT3 signaling by inducing phosphatase shatterproof 1 in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer letters. 2013;328:243-51. 36. Bharadwaj U, Eckols TK, Kolosov M, Kasembeli MM, Adam A, Torres D, et al. Drug-repositioning screening identified piperlongumine as a direct STAT3 inhibitor with potent activity against breast cancer. Oncogene. 2015;34:1341-53.
26
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
37. Shin DS, Jung SN, Yun J, Lee CW, Han DC, Kim B, et al. Inhibition of STAT3 activation by KT-18618 via the disruption of the interaction between JAK3 and STAT3. Biochemical pharmacology. 2014;89:62-73. 38. Dong Y, Yin S, Li J, Jiang C, Ye M, Hu H. Bufadienolide compounds sensitize human breast cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis via inhibition of STAT3/Mcl-1 pathway. Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death. 2011;16:394-403. 39. Jiang XP, Yang DC, Elliott RL, Head JF. Down-regulation of expression of interleukin-6 and its receptor results in growth inhibition of MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 2011;31:2899-906. 40. Krueger A, Schmitz I, Baumann S, Krammer PH, Kirchhoff S. Cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein splice variants inhibit different steps of caspase-8 activation at the CD95 death-inducing signaling complex. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2001;276:20633-40. 41. Ivanov VN, Zhou H, Partridge MA, Hei TK. Inhibition of ataxia telangiectasia mutated kinase activity enhances TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in human melanoma cells. Cancer research. 2009;69:3510-9.
Figure legend
Figure 1. CS-Ⅳa-Be induces cancer cell apoptosis. (A) The chemical structure of
CS-Ⅳa-Be. (B) LO2, HepG2, MHCC97L, SGC-7901, TF-1, U937, MDA-MB-231,
MCF-7 cells were treated with various concentrations of CS-Ⅳa-Be for 24 h and then
subjected to MTT assay, the value of IC50 was calculated. (C) Cell lysates from
MDA-MB-231 treated with various concentrations (0, 5, 7.5, 10) μM of CS-Ⅳa-Be
for 24 h were analyzed for apoptosis proteins. MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with
various concentrations (0, 7.5, 10) μM of CS-Ⅳa-Be for 24 h following being treated
by Z-VAD-FMK for 30 min, and subjected to MTT assay (D) and apoptosis assay (E).
(F) MDA-MB-231 cells treated with various concentrations (0, 5, 7.5, 10) μM of CS-
Ⅳa-Be for 24 h were stained with JC-1 and then subjected to cytometry assay. This is
a representative result of three repetitive experiments with similar results and error
bars mark SDs (*, P < 0.05).
27
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Figure 2. CS-Ⅳa-Be inhibits IL-6/STAT3 activation in MDA-MB-231 cells. (A)
Cell lysates from MDA-MB-231 cells treated with various concentrations (0, 5, 7.5,
10) μM of CS-Ⅳa-Be for 24 h were analyzed for pSTAT3 (Tyr705), STAT3,
pSTAT1(Tyr701), STAT1, pSTAT5, STAT5, pAKT, AKT, pERK1/2 and ERK1/2,
GAPDH as a loading control. (B) Cell lysates from MDA-MB-231 cells treated with
various concentrations (0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10) μM of CS-Ⅳa-Be for 8 h, followed by 15
min IL-6 (25 ng/mL) stimulation were analyzed for pSTAT3 (Tyr705), STAT3, pJAK1,
pJAK2, pSrc, pAKT, AKT, pERK1/2 and ERK1/2, GAPDH as loading control. (C)
Cell lysates from MDA-MB-231 cells treated with 10 μM of CS-Ⅳa-Be for 8 h,
followed by 15 min stimulation of 25 ng/mL IL-11, LIF, OSM respectively were
analyzed for pSTAT3 (Tyr705), STAT3, GAPDH as loading control. (D) Cell lysates
from MDA-MB-231 cells treated with 10 μM of CS-Ⅳa-Be for 8 h, followed by 15
min stimulation of 100 ng/mL EGF and IFN-γ respectively were analyzed for
pSTAT3 (Tyr705), STAT3, pSTAT1(Tyr701), STAT1, pSTAT5 and STAT5, GAPDH
as loading control. This is a representative result of three repetitive experiments with
similar results.
Figure 3. CS-Ⅳa-Be inhibits IL-6/STAT3 downstream signaling.
(A) Immunofluorescence staining of pSTAT3 (Tyr705). MDA-MB-231 cells were
treated with 5 μM CS-Ⅳa-Be for 8 hours and then pSTAT3(Tyr705) was labeled
through immunofluorescence staining, scale bar indicates 20 μm. (B) MDA-MB-231
cells were treated with various concentrations (0, 5, 7.5, 10) μM of CS-Ⅳa-Be for 24
28
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
h, after which nuclear proteins were extracted and subjected to EMSA with STAT3
probe. (C) MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with STAT3 luciferase reporter vector for
24 h, and then treated with various concentrations (0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10) μM of CS-Ⅳ
a-Be for 8 h, the STAT3 luciferase activity were measured following stimulation of
IL-6 (25 ng/mL) for 8 h. (D) Cell lysates from MDA-MB-231 cells treated with
various concentrations (0, 5, 7.5, 10) μM of CS-Ⅳa-Be for 24 h were analyzed for
Survivin, c-FLIP, XIAP, Bcl-xL and Mcl-1, GAPDH as a loading control. (E) Cell
lysates from MDA-MB-231 cells treated with various concentrations (0, 2.5, 5, 7.5,
10) μM of CS-Ⅳa-Be for 24 h, followed by IL-6 (25 ng/mL) stimulation for 15 min
were analyzed for Survivin, c-FLIP, XIAP, Bcl-xL and Mcl-1, GAPDH as a loading
control. (F) Inhibition of IL-6-induced proliferation of TF-1 cells by CS-Ⅳa-Be. TF-1
cells were incubated with IL-6 (25 ng/ml) in the presence of various concentrations (0,
2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5) μM of CS-Ⅳa-Be 24 h or 48 h, cell viability was measured by
MTT assay. This is a representative result of three repetitive experiments with similar
results and error bars mark SDs (*, P < 0.05).
Figure 4. The effect of CS-Ⅳa-Be on JAKs and other growth factor receptors in
vitro kinase enzymatic activity. (A) The effect of CS-Ⅳa-Be on JAK2, JAK3, TYK2
kinase enzymatic activity in vitro. (B) The effect of CS-Ⅳa-Be ( 25 μM and 50 μM )
on JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, Tyk2, Src, EGFR, FGFR1 and PDGFRα kinase activity in
vitro.
29
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Figure 5. CS-Ⅳa-Be disrupts IL-6/IL-6Rα/GP130 interaction. Cytometry analysis
of the inhibitory effect of CS-Ⅳa-Be on IL-6-IL-6R interaction in U937 cells.
Biotinated-IL-6 was used to label cell surface IL-6R. (A) Left panel: the levels of cell
surface IL-6Rα in cells with CS-Ⅳa-Be treatment or not; (B) right panel: cell surface
IL-6-IL-6R binding levels in cells with CS-Ⅳa-Be treatment or not. (C) ELISA
analysis of the inhibitory effect of CS-Ⅳa-Be on IL-6-IL-6Rα binding in vitro. The
maximum binding of IL-6 (100 % bound) is defined as without CS-Ⅳa-Be while in
the effects of various concentrations of CS-Ⅳa-Be calculated as percentages of
maximum binding of IL-6. Microscale thermophoresis analysis of CS-Ⅳa-Be binding
to IL-6Rα, GP130, LeptinR and LIFR. (D) CS-Ⅳa-Be binding affinity to IL-6Rα. (E)
CS- Ⅳ a-Be binding affinity to GP130, LeptinR and LIFR respectively. (F)
Recombinant human IL-6Rα with His tag was incubated with 0, 5 or 10 μM CS-Ⅳa
-Be for 2 h, then mixed with recombinant human GP130 and IL-6,
immunoprecipitated with anti-His antibody. The precipitates were washed, suspended
in reducing sample buffer and immunoblotted with anti-His or anti-GP130 antibody.
These are representative results of three repetitive experiments with similar results.
Figure 6. CS- Ⅳ a-Be sensitized to TRAIL-induced cancer cell apoptosis.
MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with 7.5 μM CS-Ⅳa-Be, TRAIL (60 ng/mL) or
combination for 24 h, the cell morphology was recorded (A) cell apoptosis was
analyzed by Annexin V/PI double staining assay (B) and Western blot with PARP
antibody (C). (D) MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells were treated with different
30
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
concentrations (0, 5, 7.5, 10) μM of CS-Ⅳa-Be for 24 h, and then subjected to
Western blot assay with DR5 antibody (up panel). MDA-MB-231 cells treated with
7.5 μM of CS-Ⅳa-Be for 24 h were subjected to cytometry assay with DR5 or DR4
antibodies, mouse IgG as an isotype control (down panel). (E) MDA-MB-231 cells
were transfected with scramble siRNA or DR5 siRNA for 24 h, treated with 7.5 μM
CS-Ⅳa-Be, 30 ng/mL TRAIL or in combination with for 24 h, cell apoptosis was
analyzed by Annexin V/PI double staining assay. These are representative results of
three repetitive experiments with similar results and error bars mark SDs (*, P <
0.05).
31
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on February 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Chikusetsusaponin ?a butyl ester (CS-?a-Be), a novel IL-6R antagonist, inhibits IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway and induces cancer cell apoptosis
Jie Yang, Shihui Qian, Xueting Cai, et al.
Mol Cancer Ther Published OnlineFirst February 29, 2016.
Updated version Access the most recent version of this article at: doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551
Supplementary Access the most recent supplemental material at: Material http://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/suppl/2016/02/27/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551.DC1
Author Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been Manuscript edited.
E-mail alerts Sign up to receive free email-alerts related to this article or journal.
Reprints and To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Subscriptions Department at [email protected].
Permissions To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link http://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/early/2016/02/27/1535-7163.MCT-15-0551. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Rightslink site.
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research.