DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record—Senate S117

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

January 25, 2002 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S117 MILLER), and the Senator from Florida The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Committee for allowing me a minute (Mr. NELSON) are necessarily absent. Senator from Vermont. to simply notify the Senate that I will I further announce that, if present Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I under- redo my amendment and try to get 60 and voting, the Senator from North stand under the unanimous consent re- votes. It will come back and be filed Dakota (Mr. DORGAN) would vote quest I am to be recognized, but the later today. It will have a 2-year time ‘‘aye.’’ distinguished Senator from Illinois and period beginning January 1 of this year Mr. NICKLES. I announce that the the distinguished Senator from Oregon and going for 2 years, with a 30-percent Senator from New Mexico (Mr. DOMEN- are here, and I ask unanimous consent depreciation bonus, and it will also spe- ICI), the Senator from Oklahoma (Mr. it be in order first to recognize the dis- cifically include the motion picture in- INHOFE), the Senator from Arizona (Mr. tinguished Senator from Illinois for 2 dustry so that they can have the ad- KYL), the Senator from Alaska (Mr. minutes, then the distinguished Sen- vantage of this stimulus as well. MURKOWSKI), the Senator from Kansas ator from Oregon for 1 minute, and the I think it is critical we do what the (Mr. ROBERTS), the Senator from Ala- distinguished Senator from Oklahoma, the Senator from Illinois is talking bama (Mr. SESSIONS), the Senator from the Republican assistant leader, for 30 about, and it is also critical we do Alabama (Mr. SHELBY), the Senator seconds, and then we revert back to my something that is actually stimulatory from Ohio (Mr. VOINOVICH), the Senator original time. of the economy. Two years is the abso- from Arkansas (Mr. HUTCHINSON), the The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Is lute minimum, if we are serious about Senator from Arizona (Mr. MCCAIN), there objection to the several requests? this part of the stimulus bill. and the Senator from Tennessee (Mr. There being no objection, the re- I yield the floor. THOMPSON) are necessarily absent. quests are agreed to. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The I further announce that if present The Senator from Illinois. Senator from Oklahoma, Mr. Nickles. and voting the Senator from Oklahoma The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Mr. NICKLES. I ask unanimous con- (Mr. INHOFE) and the Senator from Ari- Senator from Illinois. sent that it be in order I ask for the zona (Mr. KYL) would each vote ‘‘aye.’’ AMENDMENT NO. 2714 TO AMENDMENT NO. 2698 yeas and nay on amendment No. 2698. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Are (Purpose: To provide enhanced The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Is there any other Senators in the Cham- unemployment compensation benefits) there objection to the request that it ber desiring to vote? be in order? Mr. DURBIN. Pursuant to an earlier Mr. LEAHY. Reserving the right to The result was announced—yeas 81, unanimous consent request, I am send- object—I understand there is no objec- nays 0, as follows: ing to the desk an amendment being of- tion. [Rollcall Vote No. 5 Ex] fered by me on behalf of the majority The PRESIDENT pro tempore. With- YEAS—81 leader. out objection, it is so ordered. Allard DeWine Lieberman The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Is there a sufficient second? Allen Durbin Lincoln clerk will report. There is a sufficient second. The yeas Baucus Edwards Lott The legislative clerk read as follows: and nays are ordered. Bayh Ensign Lugar The Senator from Illinois [Mr. DURBIN], for Bennett Enzi McConnell Mr. NICKLES. I thank my colleague. Biden Feingold Mikulski himself, Mr. WELLSTONE, Mr. DAYTON, Ms. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Bingaman Feinstein Murray LANDRIEU, and Mrs. LINCOLN, proposes an Senator from Vermont. Bond Fitzgerald Nelson (NE) amendment numbered 2714. Mr. LEAHY. Is the Senator from Breaux Frist Nickles Mr. DURBIN. I ask unanimous con- Brownback Graham Reed Vermont correct that following my Bunning Gramm Reid sent reading of the amendment be dis- statement the distinguished senior Burns Grassley Rockefeller pensed with. Senator from Utah is to be recognized? Byrd Gregg Santorum The PRESIDENT pro tempore. With- The PRESIDENT pro tempore. That Campbell Hagel Sarbanes Cantwell Harkin Schumer out objection, it is so ordered. is correct. Carper Hatch Smith (NH) (The text of the amendment is print- f Chafee Helms Smith (OR) ed in today’s RECORD under ‘‘Amend- Cleland Hollings Snowe ments Submitted.’’) JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS Clinton Hutchison Specter Cochran Inouye Stabenow Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, this is Mr. LEAHY. I thank the distin- Collins Jeffords Stevens part of the economic stimulus package. guished Presiding Officer. Conrad Johnson Thomas It is an amendment agreed to by both Mr. President, I appreciate the fact Corzine Kerry Thurmond sides, Democrats and Republicans, to that the majority leader and the assist- Craig Kohl Torricelli Crapo Landrieu Warner extend the unemployment insurance ant majority leader moved to consider Daschle Leahy Wellstone benefits to those States which will pro- additional judicial nominations today. Dayton Levin Wyden vide protection, expanded coverage for Both Senator DASCHLE and Senator NOT VOTING—19 part-time workers who otherwise REID have been working very diligently Akaka Inhofe Roberts would not be eligible for unemploy- to clear these nominations which were Boxer Kennedy Sessions ment compensation, and expand cov- put on the Executive Calendar as we Carnahan Kyl Shelby erage to low-wage and recent hires who went out of session prior to the new Dodd McCain Thompson year. They have worked very hard to Domenici Miller Voinovich are also out of work and cannot be cov- Dorgan Murkowski ered by unemployment. It also in- return the Senate’s consideration of ju- Hutchinson Nelson (FL) creases benefit levels under unemploy- dicial nominations to a more orderly The nomination was confirmed. ment compensation by 15 percent or $25 and open process. I compliment the Senator from South Dakota and the f per week, whichever is greater. These proposals are temporary. All of the Senator from Nevada for their efforts LEGISLATIVE SESSION funding comes from Federal funding and thank them for their leadership. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under sources from the unemployment insur- Along with our Senate leaders, many the previous order, the Senate will re- ance fund. The amendment costs about Senators have been working to move turn to legislative session. $15 billion in one year, but it will pro- away from the anonymous holds and f vide direct, immediate relief to unem- inaction on judicial nominations that ployed people across America. When we characterized so much of the period HOPE FOR CHILDREN ACT— return next Tuesday, I will speak to from 1996 through the year 2000. Since Continued this amendment at length. the change in majority last summer, The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The I hope my colleagues will join me in we have already made a difference in clerk will report the title. supporting it on a bipartisan basis. terms of both the process and its re- The assistant legislative clerk read I yield the floor. sults. The number of vacancies and the as follows: The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The number of confirmations have finally A bill (H.R. 622) to amend the Internal Rev- Senator from Oregon. begun to move in the right directions. enue Code of 1986 to expand the adoption Mr. SMITH of Oregon. Mr. President, As we begin this new session, I will credit, and for other purposes. I thank the chairman of the Judiciary take a moment to report where we are VerDate 10-DEC-2001 02:32 Jan 26, 2002 Jkt 099060 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A25JA6.020 pfrm01 PsN: S25PT1 S118 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE January 25, 2002 in the handling of judicial nominations the first new judge for the Fourth Cir- The Judiciary Committee simulta- and to outline the road ahead. The dis- cuit in 3 years, and the first new judge neously, during those last 5 months of tinguished Presiding Officer knows for the Tenth Circuit in 6 years. last year, held 16 confirmation hear- more of the history of this body than Of course, more than two-thirds of ings for executive branch nominees. We any of the nearly 260 or 270 Senators the Federal court vacancies continue sent to the Senate nominees who were with whom I have served—I suspect to be on the district courts, and the ad- confirmed for 77 senior executive more than a lot of others with whom ministration has been slow to make branch posts, including the Director of he has served. I hope he will not feel it nominations to the vacancies in these the FBI, the head of the Drug Enforce- presumptuous if I take a few minutes trial courts. In the last 5 months of ment Administration, the Commis- to touch on the history and legacy of last year, the Senate confirmed a high- sioner of the Immigration and Natu- the last 6 years as it relates to judicial er percentage of the President’s dis- ralization Service, the Director of the nominations. trict court nominees than a Republican U.S. Marshals Service, the Associate Those last 6 years have left a residue majority had allowed the Senate to Attorney General, the Director of of problems that I think are going to confirm in the first session of either of ONDCP, the Director of the Patent and take a continuing effort to purge. We the last two Congresses with a Demo- Trademark Office, 7 assistant attor- are not going to do it in 1 day or 1 cratic President.
Recommended publications
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

    Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 151 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2005 No. 60 House of Representatives The House met at 12:30 p.m. clusions reached about Iraq’s weapons committees that deal with intelligence f of mass destruction programs. matters now. The committee could gar- The 9/11 Commission took the first ner input from various groups includ- MORNING HOUR DEBATES step in identifying what ails the intel- ing the intelligence community, other The SPEAKER. Pursuant to the ligence community, by pointing out governmental organizations such as order of the House of January 4, 2005, that it’s a community in name only. It CRO, CBO and GAO, and from outside the Chair will now recognize Members needs centralized direction and coordi- groups such as think tanks, former from lists submitted by the majority nation. The intelligence reform bill Members of Congress, and experts in and minority leaders for morning hour Congress enacted last year establishes the field. debates. The Chair will alternate rec- a director of national intelligence and Moreover, both the 9/11 Commission ognition between the parties, with each tries to address this problem. and the Robb-Silverman Commission party limited to not to exceed 30 min- I also believe that Congress did not made suggestions about how Congress utes, and each Member except the ma- challenge the intelligence community should reform itself to do a better job jority leader, the minority leader or aggressively enough before we invaded with intelligence issues.
  • Statement of Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee, on Cloture on the Nomination of Caitlin Halligan to the D.C

    Statement of Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee, on Cloture on the Nomination of Caitlin Halligan to the D.C

    Statement Of Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee, On Cloture On The Nomination Of Caitlin Halligan to the D.C. Circuit December 5, 2011 Tomorrow the Senate should be holding an up-or-down vote on the long-delayed nomination of Caitlin Halligan to fill one of three vacancies on the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Instead, for the seventh time since President Obama took office 34 months ago, we are required to overcome a Republican filibuster for the Senate to consider one of President Obama’s superbly qualified judicial nominees. Ms. Halligan, President Obama’s first nominee to the important D.C. Circuit, is the former Solicitor General for the State of New York. With an impressive record in private practice and public service, she is widely respected for the quality of her work as an advocate. Indeed, Ms. Halligan’s nomination was greeted with bipartisan support and has since garnered endorsements from law enforcement officials and organizations, women’s organizations, law school deans and professors, judges and preeminent lawyers from across the political spectrum. The Judiciary Committee favorably reported Ms. Halligan’s nomination nearly nine months ago. By any traditional standard, she is the kind of superbly qualified nominee who should easily have been confirmed by the Senate months ago with the support of both Republicans and Democrats. I am disappointed that yet again instead of seeing bipartisan cooperation we are required to seek cloture. New Standards for President Obama’s Judicial Nominations From the beginning of the Obama administration, we have seen Senate Republicans shift significantly away from the standards they used to apply to the judicial nominations of a Republican President.
  • Filling the D.C. Circuit Vacancies Carl W

    Filling the D.C. Circuit Vacancies Carl W

    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Law Faculty Publications School of Law 2015 Filling the D.C. Circuit Vacancies Carl W. Tobias University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/law-faculty-publications Part of the Courts Commons, Judges Commons, and the President/Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation Carl W. Tobias, Filling the D.C. Circuit Vacancies, 91 Ind. L.J. 121 (2015). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INDIANA LAW JOURNAL Volume 91 Number 1 Early Winter 2015 © Copyright 2015 by the Trustees of Indiana University CONTENTS SYMPOSIUM: ACADEMIC FREEDOM FOR THE NEXT 100 YEARS FOREW ORD .............................................................................. Steve Sanders 1 THE SOCIAL VALUE OF ACADEMIC FREEDOM DEFENDED ...... J. PeterByrne 5 ACADEMIC DUTY AND ACADEMIC FREEDOM .............................. Amy Gajda 17 THE REGRETTABLE UNDERENFORCEMENT OF INCOMPETENCE AS CAUSE To DISMISS TENURED FACULTY ............... David M Rabban 39 AAUP 1915 STATEMENT ON ACADEMIC FREEDOM ....................................... 57 ARTICLES THE GOVERNMENT'S LIES AND THE CONSTITUTION ................ Helen Norton 73 FILLING THE D.C. CIRCUIT VACANCIES ...................................... Carl Tobias 121 NOTES INCENTIVIZING THE PROTECTION OF PERSONALLY IDENTIFYING CONSUMER DATA AFTER THE HOME DEPOT BREACH ............................... Ryan F. Manion 143 No ORDINARY FISH TALE: WORKING TOWARD A TRANSNATIONAL SOLUTION TO THE COD CRISIS IN THE GULF OF MAINE ............ Michael Ruderman 165 Filling the D.C. Circuit Vacancies CARL TOBIAS* IN TR OD UCTION .....................................................................................................
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 108 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

    Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 108 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 108 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 149 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2003 No. 26—Part II Senate EXECUTIVE SESSION The problem here is that he didn’t cuit Court of Appeals for the District answer the questions the way they of Columbia. wanted him to. He answered them the Mr. SANTORUM. Mr. President, will NOMINATION OF MIGUEL A. way he should have. We put those ques- the Senator yield for a question? ESTRADA, OF VIRGINIA, TO BE tions and those answers into the UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE Mr. HATCH. I am happy to yield for RECORD today. a question without losing my right to FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUM- It is unfair, after what this man has BIA CIRCUIT the floor. gone through—after all the hearings, Mr. SANTORUM. Mr. President, one (Continued) all the questions, all the time that has of the issues I have heard raised by the The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The elapsed—almost 2 years—that this other side is that the nominee has not Senator from Utah. highly qualified individual is now being had judicial experience. In fact, the Mr. HATCH. Mr. President, here we filibustered on the floor of the Senate. chairman of the House Democratic His- are in the middle of an unprecedented If the Democrat Members of the Sen- panic Caucus wrote a letter to the Ju- filibuster against the first Hispanic ate do not like his answers, then they diciary Committee, I understand.
  • The Judicial Nominations Wars, 39 U

    The Judicial Nominations Wars, 39 U

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Richmond University of Richmond Law Review Volume 39 Issue 3 Allen Chair Symposium 2004 Federal Judicial Article 5 Selection 3-2005 The udicJ ial Nominations Wars William P. Marshall University of North Carolina School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Election Law Commons, Judges Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation William P. Marshall, The Judicial Nominations Wars, 39 U. Rich. L. Rev. 819 (2005). Available at: https://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview/vol39/iss3/5 This Symposium Articles is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Richmond Law Review by an authorized editor of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS WARS William P. Marshall * Although there is much that divides the speakers here today, there is one point upon which there is general agreement-the judicial nominations process has become increasingly divisive and is exacting a considerable toll on both the candidates and on the process itself. Indeed, it may very well be, as Judge Jones sug- gests, that the delays, partisanship, and acrimony currently dominating the process are deterring some able and talented law- yers from seeking positions in the federal judiciary.' In part, I suspect that the current judicial nominations battles are simply symptomatic of the broader political and cultural wars that so deeply divide this country.
  • Congressional Record—Senate S8167

    Congressional Record—Senate S8167

    December 5, 2011 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S8167 EXECUTIVE SESSION ported by the Judiciary Committee on publican leadership at the end of last September 15 without opposition from year to refuse to agree to votes on a single member of the Committee, those nominations. That decision stood NOMINATION OF EDGARDO RAMOS Democratic or Republican. Mr. in stark contrast to the practice fol- TO BE UNITED STATES DISTRICT Furman, an experienced Federal pros- lowed by the Democratic majority in JUDGE FOR THE SOUTHERN DIS- ecutor who served as Counselor to At- the Senate during President Bush’s TRICT OF NEW YORK torney General Michael Mukasey for first two years. Last year, Senate Re- two years during the Bush Administra- publicans refused to use the same tion, is a nominee with an impressive standards for considering President NOMINATION OF ANDREW L. CAR- background and bipartisan support. Obama’s judicial nominees as we did TER, JR., TO BE UNITED STATES There is no reason or explanation for when the Senate gave up or down votes DISTRICT JUDGE FOR THE why the Senate could not also consider to all 100 of President Bush’s judicial SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW his nomination today. nominations reported by the Com- YORK There is also no reason or expla- mittee in his first two years. All 100 nation why Republican leadership will were confirmed before the end of the not consent to consider the other 20 ju- 107th Congress, including two con- NOMINATION OF JAMES RODNEY dicial nominations waiting for final troversial circuit court nominations GILSTRAP TO BE UNITED Senate action, all but four of which reported and then confirmed during the STATES DISTRICT JUDGE FOR were reported by the Committee with- lame duck session in 2002.
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE May 10, 2005 I Guess That Is Not Happening in the U.N

    CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE May 10, 2005 I Guess That Is Not Happening in the U.N

    8992 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE May 10, 2005 I guess that is not happening in the U.N. agencies and humanitarian orga- supplemental was where we could do Sudan. At the same time we are chal- nizations are doing everything they much of this. Some of that we stepped lenging autocrats around the world, it can, a heroic job of getting assistance back from. seems we are seeking accommodation to these camps. But I have to tell you, Our values as a nation and our na- with what I consider a barbarous gov- there is a serious shortfall between a tional security require us to speak up ernment in Sudan. quality of life that is just sustainable and confront these problems. At the same time we are saying we and reality. The terrain in eastern The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- are standing with those who stand for Chad is dry, infertile and, frankly, the pore. All time in morning business has freedom, we are turning our backs on environment is bleak. It barely sup- now expired. the human rights of the people of ports the Chadians who live in the Mr. CORZINE. I thank the Presiding Darfur. It is not enough to say that be- area. There is not enough water and Officer. I hope my colleagues will con- cause the Sudanese Government shows certainly limited amounts of food. It sider this legislation when we bring it some signs of cooperation on some needs to change. back to the floor. It needs to be fought fronts, this justifies our turning our That is why we need to speak out and for.
  • Filling the D.C. Circuit Vacancies

    Filling the D.C. Circuit Vacancies

    Indiana Law Journal Volume 91 Issue 1 Article 7 12-15-2015 Filling the D.C. Circuit Vacancies Carl W. Tobias University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj Part of the Administrative Law Commons, Courts Commons, Judges Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons Recommended Citation Tobias, Carl W. (2015) "Filling the D.C. Circuit Vacancies," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 91 : Iss. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol91/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Filling the D.C. Circuit Vacancies Erratum Note: This Early Winter issue replaces the normal Fall issue of the Indiana Law Journal. This article is available in Indiana Law Journal: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol91/iss1/7 Filling the D.C. Circuit Vacancies CARL TOBIAS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 121 I. A SKETCH OF THE D.C. CIRCUIT ......................................................................... 122 II. OBAMA ADMINISTRATION SELECTION .............................................................. 123 A. DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS........................................................................... 123 B.
  • LECTURE Delivered October 24, 2018 No

    LECTURE Delivered October 24, 2018 No

    LECTURE DELIVERED OCTOBER 24, 2018 No. 1303 | JANUARY 25, 2019 The Descent of Advice and Consent: Perspectives from a 42-Year Tour of Duty The Honorable Orrin G. Hatch Abstract During his 42-year career in the Senate, Senator Orrin Hatch (R–UT) Key Points participated in the confirmation of more than half of all Article III judges who have ever served. During this time, a lot has changed about n The Kavanaugh confirmation represented a sort of culmina- the confirmation process. Both sides used to work together, or, at the tion of everything the confirma- very least, used to try to treat each other’s nominees fairly. The delay tion wars had been building to tactics that have become so commonplace used to be pretty rare. The over the past 30 years. nomination of Robert Bork in 1987 brought a sea change to the confir- n The Bork hearings gave us vilifi- mation process, with character assassination, shameless misrepresen- cation and defamation coupled tations of the nominee’s record, and partisan warfare. The only hope is with gross distortions of the that perhaps someone someday will take a step back and say, “Enough. nominee’s record. The Thomas Let’s try to work together again.” If things are going to improve, it is hearings gave us character going to take some real effort at rebuilding trust—and perhaps a leap assassination and the politics of faith or two. of personal destruction. We saw elements of both of these Introduction approaches in subsequent confirmations, particularly the It’s a real honor to be here at The Heritage Foundation.
  • Congressional Record—Senate S4806

    Congressional Record—Senate S4806

    S4806 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE May 10, 2005 our values are universal. Speaking on Chad, I met with President Deby and EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL AP- Darfur last year, he asked: also with members of the joint com- PROPRIATIONS ACT FOR DE- How can a citizen of a free country not pay mission—Chadians engaged in diplo- FENSE, THE GLOBAL WAR ON attention? How can anyone, anywhere, not matic negotiations between the Gov- TERROR, AND TSUNAMI RELIEF feel outraged? How can a person, whether re- ernment of Sudan and the Darfur ACT, 2005—CONFERENCE REPORT ligious or secular, not be moved by compas- rebels. We met with the rebels them- sion? And above all, how can anyone who re- The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- members remain silent? selves. People want peace. We met with pore. Under the previous order, the Senate will proceed to the consider- Mr. President, I just returned from people in the African Union in Addis ation of the conference report to ac- the region. Unfortunately, the Govern- Ababa, Ethiopia. company H.R. 1268, which the clerk ment of Sudan denied me the visa that Bringing these players together—not will report. I needed to visit the camps inside to mention the parties in the north- The assistant legislative clerk read Sudan. Instead, I went to Chad, where south agreement in Sudan, the EU, as follows: there are about 200,000 displaced refu- NATO, and U.N. Security Council The committee of conference on the dis- gees from Darfur. members—is a full time job. It needs agreeing votes of the two Houses on the What do the Sudanese have to hide? the attention of an individual to make amendments of the Senate to the bill (H.R.
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 108 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

    Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 108 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 108 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 149 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 2003 No. 22 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Friday, February 7, 2003, at 10:00 a.m. Senate THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 2003 The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was lic for which it stands, one nation under God, EXECUTIVE SESSION called to order by the President pro indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. tempore (Mr. STEVENS). f NOMINATION OF MIGUEL A. PRAYER ESTRADA, OF VIRGINIA, TO BE The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE RESERVATION OF LEADERSHIP Ogilvie, offered the following prayer: FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUM- TIME Almighty God, who never sends trag- BIA CIRCUIT edies or trouble but is with us in the The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under The PRESIDING OFFICER (Ms. MUR- midst of nerve-stretching times to give the previous order, leadership time is KOWSKI). Under the previous order, the us courage, we fall on the knees of our reserved. Senate will return to executive session hearts seeking the peace and hope only to resume consideration of Executive You can provide. When there is no- f Calendar No. 21, which the clerk will where else to turn it’s time to return report. to You. With the untimely death of the The legislative clerk read the nomi- heroic astronauts, we are reminded of RECOGNITION OF THE ACTING MAJORITY LEADER nation of Miguel A.
  • U.S. Department of Justice Office of Information Policy October 17, 2018

    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Information Policy October 17, 2018

    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Information Policy Suite 11050 1425 New York Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Telephone: (202) 514-3642 October 17, 2018 Mr. Gabe Roth Fix the Court 1440 G Street NW, Suite 801 Re: DOJ-2018-007104 (OLP) Washington, DC 20005 18-cv-02091 (D.D.C.) [email protected] VRB:SJD Dear Mr. Roth: This is our second interim response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request dated and received in this Office on July 24, 2018, for correspondence between the Office of Legal Policy and Brett Kavanaugh from January 20, 2001 to May 30, 2006. This response is made on behalf of the Office of Legal Policy (OLP). In our letter dated October 5, 2018, we provided you with an interim release of seventy- four pages containing records responsive to your request. At this time, I have determined that an additional 619 pages are appropriate for release without excision, and copies are enclosed. For your information, Congress excluded three discrete categories of law enforcement and national security records from the requirements of the FOIA. See 5 U.S.C. § 552(c) (2012 & Supp. V 2017). This response is limited to those records that are subject to the requirements of the FOIA. This is a standard notification that is given to all our requesters and should not be taken as an indication that excluded records do, or do not, exist. If you have any questions regarding this response, please contact Laura Hunt of the Department’s Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch at (202) 616-8207.