DOCSLIB.ORG

First Records of Liberian Mongoose Liberiictis Kuhni in Sapo National Park, Southeast Liberia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
First Records of Liberian Mongoose Liberiictis Kuhni in Sapo National Park, Southeast Liberia First records of Liberian Mongoose Liberiictis kuhni in Sapo National Park, southeast Liberia Tina VOGT1, Bernhard 1 Quawah2, Chris 3, Chloe 4 and Ben Forster , Joshua N. 5 RANSOM Abstract HODGKINSON COLLEN Liberian Mongoose Liberiictus kuhni was photographed three times between November 2011 and FebruaryThe 2012 IUCN in Red two List sites of Threatenedwithin Sapo Species National Park, southeast Liberia. These photographs, taken during the day in the early and late afternoon, confirm workits presence is required 80 km to establishfurther south the limits than ofpreviously its distribution recorded. in Liberia. Currently listed as Vulnerable by , the species was previously only known from northeastern Liberia and western Côte d’Ivoire. Further survey Keywords Premières: camera-trapping, observations daytime de Mangoustes activity, extension du ofLibéria known rangeLiberiictis kuhni dans le Parc National de Sapo, au sud-est du Libéria Résumé La Mangouste du Libéria Liberiictis kuhni a été photographiée trois fois entre novembre 2011 et février 2012 sur deux sites du lementParc National classée de «Vulnérable» Sapo, au sud-est par la duListe Libéria. Rouge Ces des photographies,Espèces Menacées prises de l’UICN la journée, en début et fin d’après-midi, confirment sa duprésence Libéria à etune à l’ouest distance de de la Côte80 km d’Ivoire. au sud Desdes étudessites sur complémentaires lesquels sa présence sont anécessaires été précédemment pour déterminer enregistrée les limitesau Libéria. de son Actuel aire- de répartition. , l’espèce n’était jusqu’alors connue qu’au nord-est Mots-clés : piège photographique, extension d’habitat, activité diurne Liberian Mongoose Liberiictis kuhni is a poorly documented et al wild in northeastern Liberia and Taï National Park, western small carnivore of the area defined by White (1983) as the Up- Côte d’Ivoire (Goldman & Taylor 1990, Colyn . 1998), the per Guinean Rainforest. Described in 1958 from eight skulls furthest south it has been found previously in Liberia is Nim- found in northeastern Liberia (Hayman 1958), the first com- bowehn, Gbi National Forest. It was assumed that the species plete specimens were not secured until 1974 (Schlitter 1974) is very likely to occur in similar suitable habitats in adjacent ilywith dark the brownfirst live body specimen and a bushycaptured tail, in with Gbi prominentNational Forest, dark areas, including Sapo National Park (= Sapo NP) in southeast stripesnortheastern on the Liberia neck, which in 1989 are (Taylor bordered 1992). by white. It has Compareda primar- Liberia, approximately 80 km south of Gbi. However, previous with other mongoose species, Liberian Mongoose has rather attempts to confirm this species’s presence in Sapo NP, by live- long claws and an elongated snout with small, reduced cheek traps and camera-traps, were unsuccessful (Robinson 1983, ofTaylor two 1992).individuals, While the a 2010identity survey of the of specimensa commercial was hunting uncon Listed as Vulnerable on The IUCN Red List of Threatened camp on the southern border of Sapo NP recorded the killing Speciesteeth, but long, sharp canines (Schlitter 1974). - population status and distribution range is not available. Ho firmed (Greengrass 2011). wever, the(IUCN population 2012), reliableis assumed information to be declining: on the itspecies’s is hun tropicalSapo forest NP, Liberia’s ecosystems only inNational Liberia. Park, Contained comprises within an areaone - of the180,365 largest ha remaining and represents blocks oneof the of threatened the most nearly Upper intactGuin - itsted rangefor meat due using to logging, dogs, shotgunsmining and and conversion snares (Taylor to agricul 1992, including swampy areas, dryland and riparian forests. The- Greengrass 2011) and extensive habitat loss is occurring in terrainean Forest, throughout Sapo NP the consists park is entirely generally of homogeneous,lowland rainforest, with and secondary forests, and is found mainly in swamp forest- andture streambeds(FAO 2011). with Liberian deep Mongoosesandy soils occurs where inearthworms, both primary its southwestern and central parts to higher elevations of ap et al lower (100–200 m) elevations and gently rolling hills in the Dunham 2011). Known to turn over large areas of the forest - preferred food source, are abundant (Schreiber . 1989, demismproximately and 400 provides m in the one steeper of the ridgeslast strongholds of the northeast. for several Sapo NP harbours an exceptional biodiversity with high rates of en- scalefloor whileecosystem foraging, heterogeneity, Liberian Mongoose affecting isseed thought predation, to play mo an Choeropsis liberiensis, West African Chimpanzee Pan troglo- important role as an ‘ecosystem engineer’ by increasing small- dytesglobally verus Endangered and Jentink’s species Duiker such Cephalophus as Pygmy jentinki Hippopotamus. - vement and germination (Dunham 2011). Recorded in the Small Carnivore Conservation, 35 Vol. 47: 35–37, December 2012 Vogt et al. In 2001, Fauna & Flora International (FFI) in collabor- ation with the Liberian government’s Forestry Development Authority (FDA) established a long-term faunal biomonitoring programme in Sapo NP, which was re-started in 2007 following the end of the civil war (Waitkuwait & Suter 2001, Waitkuwait 2003, Vogt 2011). In 2008, with the support of the Zoologicalet al. Society of London (ZSL), the programme was complemented by regular systematic camera-trappinget al surveys (Collen et al. 2011). Surveys were designed to detect wide-ranging and cameras,cryptic species spaced (Collen at 2 km intervals. 2011). and Following mounted O’Brien 40 cm from (2010) a grid of 32 infrared heat- and motion- sensitive digital centrethe ground, of each was grid set square for a minimum was located of using35 days a GPS and Garmin at 24-hour map 62soperation unit, and mode one in camera each of wastwo secureddifferent in areas an optimal of Sapo location NP. The Fig. 2. The first photograph of a Liberian Mongoose Liberiictis kuhni in Sapo National Park, Liberia: 8 November 2011. © FFI/FDA/ZSL from the centre of the grid square. Altitudes were measured by(e.g. a GPSnext Garminto a recently map 62s used unit. animal All positions trail), in area 100-m given radiusunder three surveys were conducted annually. In the southwestern the WGS84 datum. No baits or inedible lures were used. One to part of Sapo NP (Survey Grid 1), the camera grid was estab- lished four times, in January–March 2008, May–July 2009, De- cember 2010 – January 2011 and October–November 2011. In the northern part (Survey Grid 2), the camera grid was estab- lishedLiberian four times, Mongoose in November–December was not recorded before2008, February–late 2011 April 2009, June–July 2011 and February–March 2012 (Fig. 1). despite a prior survey effort of 4,500 camera-trap days. Its first photograph was taken on 8 November 2011 by a camera swampyin southwestern area within Sapo primary NP, at lowland5°18'45.6"’N, forest. 8°43'32.6"W A second record and 118 m measured altitude (Fig. 2). It was taken at 14h06, in a Fig. 3. The second record of Liberian Mongoose Liberiictis kuhni in Sapo from the northern part of the Park (55 km from the first) was National Park, Liberia, in the north: 13 February 2012. © FFI/FDA/ZSL ofobtained Liberian during Mongoose February were 2012, taken at 25°29'26.5"N, by the same camera,8°23'18.1"W on a and 202 m measured altitude (Fig. 3). Two series of pictures showedgentle slope more within than one primary animal. forest: the first on 8 February at These first verifiable records of Liberian Mongoose in 16h58, the second on 13 February at 14h05. No photograph comparativelySapo NP provide low valuabledetection information rate and the onfact the that distribution the animal wasrange not of recordedthis poorly before documented the fourth species. year Explanationsof the ongoing for cam the era study at present remain speculative and require more in - - Itvestigation. further has The been survey found was that not effective specifically detection designed distance for this is stronglyspecies, butpositively to detect related medium to tospecies large forest-dwellingbody mass and species.weakly et al negatively to species average speed of movement (Rowcliffe size . of2011). L. kuhni In the. However, context of comparison our study it withis plausible detection that, rates at least of in part, low detection rates are explained by the small body class at the same time suggest that this is not the case. Table 1ground-living shows the number mammal of speciestrap events of similar over the or lower same size/weighttime period of several species of similar or lower weight than Liberian Atherurus africanus, Ge- nettaMongoose, bourloni namely and G.African pardina Brush-tailed), Marsh Mongoose Porcupine Atilax palu- Fig. 1. Sapo National Park, Liberia, showing the location of the two dinosus two species of the large-spottedFunisciurus genet pyrropuscomplex (and camera-trap grids used in 2008–2011. Heliosciurus rufobrachium. Compared , Fire-footed Rope Squirrel Red-legged Sun Squirrel Small Carnivore Conservation, Vol. 47, December 2012 36 Liberian Mongoose in Sapo NP, Liberia Table 1. Number of trap events of selected mammal species similar to or 2011. lighter than Liberian Mongoose Liberiictus kuhni in weight, during two The state of the world’s forests 2011 Rome, Italy. [FAO] Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations camera-trapping surveys in Sapo National Park, Liberia, 2011–2012. Liberiictis kuhni. Mammalian Spe- . FAO, Species1 Weight (kg)2 Number of trap events3 cies GreengrassGoldman, C. A. 2011.& Taylor, Exploring M. E. 1990. the dynamics of bushmeat hunting and November February trade 348: in Sapo 1–3. National Park 2011 2012 bridge,, E.U.K. Atherurus africanus 1.5 – 4.0 111 35 Hayman A new genus. Fauna and species & Flora of International, West African monCam- Genetta bourloni 1.2 – 3.1 17 10 goose. Annals and Magazine of Natural History Genetta pardina 1.2 – 3.1 10 10 , R. W.IUCN 1958.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sapo National Park in West Africa: Liberia's First
    362 Environmental Conservation Sapo National Park in West Africa: Liberia's First Sapo National Park is the first to be established of three proposed national parks and four nature reserves that were selected in late 1978 and early 1979 with the assistance of IUCN and the World Wildlife Fund. The Park is situated in southeastern Liberia and covers a total land area of 505 sq. miles (1,308 sq. km) of primary lowland rain-forest (Fig. 1). Sapo is 440 miles (704 km) by road from Monrovia, Liberia's capital city. There are regular local air services from Monrovia to Greenville (lying to the South-West of the Park) and Zwedru to its North. The new National Park supports many species of large and small mammals which are also distributed through- out the forested regions of the country. Among these are FIG. 1. Aerial view of Sapo National Park, Liberia, showing the seven species of duikers including rare ones such as undulating terrain and covering of rain-forest. Jentink's Duiker {Cephalophus jentinki), Ogilby's Duiker (C. ogilbyi), and the Zebra Duiker (C. zebra). Other others are ex-hunters or farmers who are well-acquainted mammals include the Bongo (Boccerns euryceros), Pygmy with the forest environment in that part of the country. Hippopotamus {Choeropsis liberiensis), Forest Buffalo The official establishment of Sapo National Park in {Syncerus coffer nanus), and the Forest Elephant May 1983 was a major breakthrough for wildlife {Loxodonta africana cyclotis). More than ten species of conservation practices in Liberia, and its development primates are found in Sapo: these include Chimpanzee may stimulate the creation of the other national parks and {Pan troglodytes), Western Black and White Colobus nature reserves.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Animals
    Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Fish and Wildlife Policy Division Controlled Animals Wildlife Regulation, Schedule 5, Part 1-4: Controlled Animals Subject to the Wildlife Act, a person must not be in possession of a wildlife or controlled animal unless authorized by a permit to do so, the animal was lawfully acquired, was lawfully exported from a jurisdiction outside of Alberta and was lawfully imported into Alberta. NOTES: 1 Animals listed in this Schedule, as a general rule, are described in the left hand column by reference to common or descriptive names and in the right hand column by reference to scientific names. But, in the event of any conflict as to the kind of animals that are listed, a scientific name in the right hand column prevails over the corresponding common or descriptive name in the left hand column. 2 Also included in this Schedule is any animal that is the hybrid offspring resulting from the crossing, whether before or after the commencement of this Schedule, of 2 animals at least one of which is or was an animal of a kind that is a controlled animal by virtue of this Schedule. 3 This Schedule excludes all wildlife animals, and therefore if a wildlife animal would, but for this Note, be included in this Schedule, it is hereby excluded from being a controlled animal. Part 1 Mammals (Class Mammalia) 1. AMERICAN OPOSSUMS (Family Didelphidae) Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana 2. SHREWS (Family Soricidae) Long-tailed Shrews Genus Sorex Arboreal Brown-toothed Shrew Episoriculus macrurus North American Least Shrew Cryptotis parva Old World Water Shrews Genus Neomys Ussuri White-toothed Shrew Crocidura lasiura Greater White-toothed Shrew Crocidura russula Siberian Shrew Crocidura sibirica Piebald Shrew Diplomesodon pulchellum 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2008 IUCN Red Listings of the World's Small Carnivores
    The 2008 IUCN red listings of the world’s small carnivores Jan SCHIPPER¹*, Michael HOFFMANN¹, J. W. DUCKWORTH² and James CONROY³ Abstract The global conservation status of all the world’s mammals was assessed for the 2008 IUCN Red List. Of the 165 species of small carni- vores recognised during the process, two are Extinct (EX), one is Critically Endangered (CR), ten are Endangered (EN), 22 Vulnerable (VU), ten Near Threatened (NT), 15 Data Deficient (DD) and 105 Least Concern. Thus, 22% of the species for which a category was assigned other than DD were assessed as threatened (i.e. CR, EN or VU), as against 25% for mammals as a whole. Among otters, seven (58%) of the 12 species for which a category was assigned were identified as threatened. This reflects their attachment to rivers and other waterbodies, and heavy trade-driven hunting. The IUCN Red List species accounts are living documents to be updated annually, and further information to refine listings is welcome. Keywords: conservation status, Critically Endangered, Data Deficient, Endangered, Extinct, global threat listing, Least Concern, Near Threatened, Vulnerable Introduction dae (skunks and stink-badgers; 12), Mustelidae (weasels, martens, otters, badgers and allies; 59), Nandiniidae (African Palm-civet The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is the most authorita- Nandinia binotata; one), Prionodontidae ([Asian] linsangs; two), tive resource currently available on the conservation status of the Procyonidae (raccoons, coatis and allies; 14), and Viverridae (civ- world’s biodiversity. In recent years, the overall number of spe- ets, including oyans [= ‘African linsangs’]; 33). The data reported cies included on the IUCN Red List has grown rapidly, largely as on herein are freely and publicly available via the 2008 IUCN Red a result of ongoing global assessment initiatives that have helped List website (www.iucnredlist.org/mammals).
    [Show full text]
  • An Act for the Extension of Ti1e Sapo National Park
    AN ACT FOR THE EXTENSION OF TI1E SAPO NATIONAL PARK APPROVED: OCTOBER 10,2003 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS ,OCTOBER 24, 2003 MONROVIA, LIBERIA AN ACT FOR THE EXTENSION OF THE SAPO NATIONAL PARK WHEREAS, it has been the policy of the Government of the Republic of Liberia to adopt such measures as deemed conducive in the interest of the State; and WHEREAS, our forests are among our greatest natural resources and may be made to contribute greatly to the socio­ economic, scientific and educational welfare of Liberia by being managed in such a manner as to ensure their sustainable use; and WHEREAS, the protection, conservation and sustainable utilization of these resources must be carried out promptly, efficiently and wisely, under such conditions as will ensure continued benefits to present and future generations of Liberia; and WHEREAS, 'Sapo National Park, establlsheo in 1983, is recognized as being at the core of an immense forests block of the Upper Guinea Forest Ecosystem that is important to the conservation of the biodiversity of Liberia and of West Africa as a whole; and WHEREAS, it has been determined by socio-economic and biological surveys and with consultation of the local community that the integrity of the Sapo National Park consisting of 323,075 acres requires that its boundaries be extended; NOW THEREFORE it is enacted by the Senate and the House at Representatives ofthe Republic ofUberia, in Legislative Assembled: Section 1.1 Title: An Act for the Extension of the Sapo National Park to Embrace 445,677 Acres of Forest Land Section 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Panthera Pardus) Range Countries
    Profiles for Leopard (Panthera pardus) Range Countries Supplemental Document 1 to Jacobson et al. 2016 Profiles for Leopard Range Countries TABLE OF CONTENTS African Leopard (Panthera pardus pardus)...................................................... 4 North Africa .................................................................................................. 5 West Africa ................................................................................................... 6 Central Africa ............................................................................................. 15 East Africa .................................................................................................. 20 Southern Africa ........................................................................................... 26 Arabian Leopard (P. p. nimr) ......................................................................... 36 Persian Leopard (P. p. saxicolor) ................................................................... 42 Indian Leopard (P. p. fusca) ........................................................................... 53 Sri Lankan Leopard (P. p. kotiya) ................................................................... 58 Indochinese Leopard (P. p. delacouri) .......................................................... 60 North Chinese Leopard (P. p. japonensis) ..................................................... 65 Amur Leopard (P. p. orientalis) ..................................................................... 67 Javan Leopard
    [Show full text]
  • Rajan Amin Zsl Camera Trapping
    ZSL CAMERA TRAP ANALYSIS PACKAGE RAJAN AMIN ZSL CAMERA TRAPPING • BIODIVERSITY SURVEY AND MONITORING • RESEARCH IN ANALYTICAL METHODS • TRAINING IN FIELD IMPLEMENTATION • ANALYTICAL PROCESSING TOOLS • RANGE OF SPECIES, HABITATS & CONSERVATION OBJECTIVES ZSL CAMERA TRAPPING • ALGERIA • MONGOLIA • KENYA • NEPAL • TANZANIA • THAILAND • LIBERIA • INDONESIA • GUINEA • RUSSIA • NIGER • SAUDI ARABIA • Et al. KENYA: ADERS’ DUIKER COASTAL FOREST • Critically endangered species • Poor knowledge of wildlife in the area MONGOLIA: GOBI BEAR DESERT • Highly threatened flagship species • Very little known about it NEPAL: TIGER GRASSLAND AND FORESTS • National level surveys, highly threatened flagship species SAUDI ARABIA: ARABIAN GAZELLE • Highly threatened species • Monitoring reintroduction efforts ZSL CAMERA TRAP ANALYSIS PACKAGE OCCUPANCY SPECIES RICHNESS TRAPPING RATE & LOCATION ACTIVITY Why is an analysis tool needed? MANUAL PROCESSING: MULTI-SPECIES STUDIES 45 cameras x 150days x c.30sp 30 25 20 15 Observed Discovery Rate N SpeciesN Minus 1 sd 10 Plus 1 sd Diversity estimate (Jacknife 1) 5 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Days of Camera trapping WA Large-spotted Genet Bourlon's Genet 7 8 6 7 5 6 5 4 4 3 Events Events 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Hr. Hr. MANUAL PROCESSING: MULTI-SPECIES STUDIES 80 Camera sites x 100 days x c.30sp Amin, R., Andanje, S., Ogwonka, B., Ali A. H., Bowkett, A., Omar, M. & Wacher, T. 2014 The northern coast forests of Kenya are nationally and globally important for the conservation of Aders’ duiker Cephalophus adersi and other antelope species.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Carnivore CAMP 1993.Pdf
    SMALL CARNIVORE CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN Final Review Draft Report 1G May 1994 Edited and compiled by Roland Wirth, Angela Glatston, Onnie Byers, Susie Ellis, Pat Foster-Turley, Paul Robinson, Harry Van Rompaey, Don Moore, Ajith Kumar, Roland Melisch, and Ulysses Seal Prepared by the participants of a workshop held in Rotterdam, The Netherlands 11-14 February 1993 A Collaborative Workshop IUCN/SSC MUSTELID, VIVERRID, AND PROCYONID SPECIALIST GROUP IUCN/SSC OTTER SPECIALIST GROUP IUCN/SSC CAPTIVE BREEDING SPECIALIST GROUP Sponsored by The Rotterdam Zoo IUCN/SSC Sir Peter Scott Fund United Kingdom Small Carnivore Taxon Advisory Group A contribution of the IUCN/SSC Captive Breeding Specialist Group, IUCN/SSC Mustelid, Viverrid, and Procyonid Specialist Group and the IUCN/SSC Otter Specialist Group. The Primary Sponsors of the Workshop were: The Rotterdam Zoo, IUCN/SSC Peter Scott Fund, United Kingdom Small Carnivore Taxon Advisory Group. Cover Photo: Malayan Civet, Viverra tangalunga by Roland Wirth. Wirth, R., A Glatston, 0. Byers, S. Ellis, P. Foster-Turley, P. Robinson, H. Van Rompaey, D. Moore, A Kumar, R. Melisch, U.Seal. (eds.). 1994. Small Carnivore Conservation Assessment and Management Plan. IUCN/SSC Captive Breeding Specialist Group: Apple Valley, MN. Additional copies of this publication can be ordered through the IUCN/SSC Captive Breeding Specialist Group, 12101 Johnny Cake Ridge Road, Apple Valley, MN 55124. Send checks for US $35.00 (for printing and shipping costs) payable to CBSG; checks must be drawn on a US Bank. Funds may be wired to First Bank NA ABA No. 091000022, for credit to CBSG Account No.
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Area Management Plan Development - SAPO NATIONAL PARK
    Technical Assistance Report Protected Area Management Plan Development - SAPO NATIONAL PARK - Sapo National Park -Vision Statement By the year 2010, a fully restored biodiversity, and well-maintained, properly managed Sapo National Park, with increased public understanding and acceptance, and improved quality of life in communities surrounding the Park. A Cooperative Accomplishment of USDA Forest Service, Forestry Development Authority and Conservation International Steve Anderson and Dennis Gordon- USDA Forest Service May 29, 2005 to June 17, 2005 - 1 - USDA Forest Service, Forestry Development Authority and Conservation International Protected Area Development Management Plan Development Technical Assistance Report Steve Anderson and Dennis Gordon 17 June 2005 Goal Provide support to the FDA, CI and FFI to review and update the Sapo NP management plan, establish a management plan template, develop a program of activities for implementing the plan, and train FDA staff in developing future management plans. Summary Week 1 – Arrived in Monrovia on 29 May and met with Forestry Development Authority (FDA) staff and our two counterpart hosts, Theo Freeman and Morris Kamara, heads of the Wildlife Conservation and Protected Area Management and Protected Area Management respectively. We decided to concentrate on the immediate implementation needs for Sapo NP rather than a revision of existing management plan. The four of us, along with Tyler Christie of Conservation International (CI), worked in the CI office on the following topics: FDA Immediate
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Preference and Activity Pattern of the Pygmy Hippopotamus Analyzed by Camera Trapping and GIS
    Habitat preference and activity pattern of the pygmy hippopotamus analyzed by camera trapping and GIS Student: Henk Eshuis (Msc Forest and Nature Conservation, Wageningen University) Supervisors: Dr. P. van Hooft (Resource Ecology Group, Wageningen University) Assoc Prof. M.C.J. Paris (Institute for Breeding Rare and Endangered African Mammals; IBREAM (www.ibream.org) For further enquiries contact [email protected]) Habitat preference and activity pattern of the pygmy hippopotamus analyzed by camera trapping and GIS Submitted: 03-11-2011 REG-80439 Student: Henk Eshuis (Msc Forest and Nature Conservation, Wageningen University) 850406229010 Supervisors: Dr. P. van Hooft (Resource Ecology Group, Wageningen University) Assoc prof. M.C.J. Paris (Institute for Breeding Rare and Endangered African Mammals; IBREAM, www.ibream.org) Abstract The pygmy hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis) is an elusive and endangered species that only occurs in West Africa. Not much is known about the habitat preference and activity pattern of this species. We performed a camera trapping study and collected locations of pygmy hippo tracks in Taï National Park, Ivory Coast, to determine this more in detail. In total 1785 trap nights were performed with thirteen recordings of pygmy hippo on ten locations. In total 159 signs of pygmy hippo were found. We analyzed the habitat preferences with a normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) from satellite images, distance to rivers and clustering using GIS. The NDVI indicates that pygmy hippos are mostly found in a wetter vegetation type. Most tracks we found in the first 250 m from a river and the tracks show significant clustering. These observations indicate that the pygmy hippopotamus prefers relatively wet vegetation close to rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Guinean Forests of West Africa Biodiversity Hotspot Small Grants Key Information 1
    Call for Letters of Inquiry (LOI) Guinean Forests of West Africa Biodiversity Hotspot Small Grants Key information 1. Eligible Countries: Benin, Cameroon, Ivory Coast, Equatorial Guinea, Ghana, Guinea, Liberia, Nigeria, Sao Tome & Principe, Sierra Leone and Togo Deadline: August 14, 2017 Eligible Strategic Directions: 1, 2 and 3 (you must choose only one) Eligible Applicants: This call is open to community groups and associations, non-governmental organizations, private enterprises, universities, research institutes and other civil society organizations. Small Grants (up to US$50,000): Submit letters of Inquiry (LOIs) by email to [email protected]. The LOI application template for small grants can be found in English here. Table of Contents 1. Background……………………….................................................................................................2 2. Ecosystem Profile Summary………………………………………………………………………….2 3. Eligible Applicants………………………………………………………………………………………3 4. Eligible Geographies……………………………………………………………………………………3 5. Eligible Strategic Directions…………………………………………………………………………..4 6. How to Apply……………………………………………………………………………………………..5 7. Closing Date……………………………………………………………………………………………...5 8. Contacts…………………………………………………………………………………………………...6 Annex…………………………………………………………………………………………………………...7 1 1. Background The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is designed to safeguard Earth’s biologically richest and most threatened regions, known as biodiversity hotspots. CEPF is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL REPORT: Survey of Wildlife and Anthropogenic Threats in the Grebo-Sapo Corridor, South-Eastern Liberia
    FINAL REPORT: Survey of Wildlife and Anthropogenic threats in the Grebo-Sapo Corridor, South-eastern Liberia (May-July 2015) Prepared by Wild Chimpanzee Foundation In collaboration with Forestry Development Authority, Liberia December 2015 FURNELL Simon DOWD Dervla TWEH Clement ZORO GONE BI Irie Berenger VERGNES Virginie NORMAND Emmanuelle BOESCH Christophe Wild Chimpanzee Foundation [email protected] Tel: +231(0) 880 533 495 Final Report: Survey of Wildlife and Anthropogenic threats in the Grebo-Sapo Corridor, 2014, WCF/FDA Executive summary A- Generalities and Survey Methodology In 2013, a corridor linking Proposed Grebo-Krahn National Park(PGKNP) with the Sapo National Park (SNP) was identified, under the Taï-Grebo-Sapo Transboundary Corridor Initiative, a scheme led by the Governments of Côte d’Ivoire and Liberia. The corridor runs through a major logging concession (FMC ‘F’) and community land (Putu and Chedepo Districts of Grand Gedeh and River Gee counties respectively). To evaluate the feasibility and potential impact of creating the corridor, a survey was led to measure the presence of both wildlife and anthropogenic threats inside the corridor. The survey would also provide a first idea of the potential boundary lines of the corridor. Supervised by trained WCF staff and FDA rangers, 3 teams of trained FDA rangers, auxiliaries and community members walked 103.17 km across two systematic transect designs (1 for the concession, 1 for the community land) between the 28th of May 2015 and the 15th of July 2015. Data was collected on the presence of large mammal and anthropogenic activities. Data was collected following IUCN Standards for Great Ape Surveys (Kühl et al., 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Choeropsis Liberiensis ) in and Around the Gola Rainforest National Park
    Studying the distribution and abundance of the Endangered pygmy hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis ) in and around the Gola Rainforest National Park in southeastern Sierra Leone by Jerry C. Garteh A Dissertation in the Department of Biological Sciences submitted to the School of Environmental Sciences of Njala University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Award of Degree of Master of Science in Biodiversity Conservation December 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................ i List of Tables ................................................................................................................. iv List of Figures ................................................................................................................ v List of Appendices ......................................................................................................... vi Abstract ......................................................................................................................... vii Dedication ..................................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgement ......................................................................................................... ix Certification ................................................................................................................... xi CHAPTER ONE 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]