2013 Ontario Hospitals Maternal-Child

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2013 Ontario Hospitals Maternal-Child PCMCH Maternal-Child Benchmarking Report 2013 Table of Contents ABOUT PCMCH ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Benchmarking Report Recommendations ............................................................................................................................. 3 Report Framework ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 List of Participating Hospitals and Acronyms ........................................................................................................................ 8 ACADEMIC HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRES................................................................................................................................ 11 HOSPITAL PROFILES ....................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Service Profiles ..................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Bed Profiles .......................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Emergency Department Profiles .......................................................................................................................................... 21 CLINICAL INDICATORS .................................................................................................................................................................... 24 1.0 Provincial Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... 24 1.1.1 PO – LHIN Map ............................................................................................................................................................................ 24 1.1.2 PO – Paediatric AHSCs Inpatient Discharges, Distributed by Hospital & LHIN ............................................................................ 25 1.1.3 PO – Paediatric AHSCs Inpatient Discharges by LHIN.................................................................................................................. 26 2.0 Hospital Descriptors ....................................................................................................................................................... 27 DES 2.1.1 – Inpatient and Same Day Surgery Volumes ........................................................................................................................ 27 DES 2.1.2 – Neonatal and Paediatric Inpatient Case Distribution ........................................................................................................ 28 DES 2.1.3 – Inpatient Case Age Profile ................................................................................................................................................. 29 DES 2.1.4 – Same Day Surgery (SDS) Age Profile ................................................................................................................................. 30 DES 2.1.5 – Total Average Length of Stay ............................................................................................................................................ 31 DES 2.1.6 – Total Average Length of Stay (Neonatal and Paediatric) .................................................................................................. 32 DES 2.1.7 – Total Average Inpatient Weight per Case ......................................................................................................................... 33 DES 2.1.8 – Percent Typical, Outlier & Other Inpatient Cases and Patient Days.................................................................................. 34 DES 2.1.9 – Percent “Transfer From” (Inpatient Cases and Patient Days) ........................................................................................... 35 DES 2.1.10 – Percent “Transfer To” (Inpatient Cases and Patient Days).............................................................................................. 36 DES 2.1.11 – Percent of Cases and Days with LOS > 30 Days ............................................................................................................... 37 3.0 Emergency Department Indicators ................................................................................................................................ 38 ED 3.1.1 – Hospital Emergency Department Patient Volumes ............................................................................................................ 38 ED 3.1.2 – Emergency Department Average Length of Stay in Hours – All Dispositions...................................................................... 39 ED 3.1.3 – Emergency Department Visits (Age Profile) ........................................................................................................................ 40 ED 3.1.4 – Emergency Department Visits by Triage Level .................................................................................................................... 41 ED 3.1.5 – Emergency Department Visits by Top 15 Main Problems ................................................................................................... 42 ED 3.1.6 – Emergency Department Visits Admitted ............................................................................................................................ 43 ED 3.1.7 – ED Visits Left Without Being Seen/Against Medical Advice or Other ................................................................................. 44 4.0 Clinical Efficiency Indicators .......................................................................................................................................... 45 4.1.1 CE – Top 10 CMGs Typical Inpatient Cases ................................................................................................................................. 45 4.1.2 CE – Top 10 CMGs Typical Inpatient Cases (One and Two Day Stay) .......................................................................................... 46 5.0 Quality and Utilization Management Indicators ....................................................................................................... 47 The most responsible diagnosis codes used in section 5.1 Appropriateness of Care are listed below: ............................ 47 QUM 5.1.1 - Percentage of Paediatric Admissions Treated for Asthma .............................................................................................. 48 QUM 5.1.2 – Percentage of Paediatric Admissions Treated for Diabetes ............................................................................................ 49 QUM 5.1.3 – Percentage of Paediatric Admissions Treated for Gastroenteritis .................................................................................. 50 OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY INDICATORS ............................................................................................................................................. 51 6.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 51 6.1.1 OE – Hospital Net Operating Costs (in millions) .......................................................................................................................... 53 6.1.2 OE – Hospital Net Operating Costs (Percent Distribution) .......................................................................................................... 54 6.1.3 OE – Compensation Costs per Functional Centre Category ........................................................................................................ 55 6.1.4 OE – Compensation Costs as a Percent of Total per Functional Centre Category ...................................................................... 56 6.1.5 OE – Hours per Functional Centre Category ............................................................................................................................... 57 6.1.6 OE – Hours as a Percent of Total per Functional Centre Category .............................................................................................. 58 6.2 Operational Efficiency Comparisons .............................................................................................................................. 59 6.2.1 OE – Inpatient Only Net Operating Costs per Inpatient RIW Weighted Case ............................................................................. 59 6.2.2 OE – Inpatient Net Operating Costs per Inpatient Day ............................................................................................................... 60 6.2.3 OE – Inpatient Detailed Compensation and Hours Indicators .................................................................................................... 61 6.2.4 OE – Inpatient Med/Surg Only Detailed Indicators
Recommended publications
  • The Emergency Department Return Visit Quality Program: Results from the First Year
    The Emergency Department Return Visit Quality Program Results from the first year The Emergency Department Return Visit Quality Program Results from the first year Suggested citation: Health Quality Ontario. The Emergency Department Return Visit Quality Program: Results from the first year. Toronto: Health Quality Ontario; 2017. Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................4 Section 1. Program implementation ...............................................8 Section 2. An overview of the audit results. 12 Section 3. Common themes and QI initiatives among the audits that identified quality issues/adverse events ................................16 All-cause 72-hour return visits ................................................17 Sentinel diagnoses .........................................................25 Moving forward .............................................................29 References .................................................................30 Acknowledgments ...........................................................31 Appendix A. Methodology .....................................................33 The Emergency Department Return Visit Quality Program: Results from the first year | Health Quality Ontario 3 Introduction A just, patient-centred health system that is committed to relentless improvement. This is our vision for ED sites Ontario’s health system as defined in Quality Matters. A total of participated Quality Matters defines a quality health system as one that is safe,
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Department Services in Ontario 1993 – 2000 Technical Appendix Emergency Department Services in Ontario — Technical Appendix
    Research Atlas Atlas Report Emergency Department Key Findings Services ✔ About one in five people in Ontario visit an emergency department (ED) at least in Ontario once a year, making these facilities a key point of contact between citizens and 1993 – 2000 their health care system. ✔ The per capita use of EDs by Ontarians declined by 10% from 1993 to 2000. Part of this decline was related to fewer low-acuity cases being seen in the ED. ✔ There are highly predictable peak 1,2,3,4 Benjamin T.B. Chan, MD MPH MPA periods in emergency volume during Michael J. Schull, MD MSc FRCP(C) 1,5,6 holidays and weekends. Susan E. Schultz, MA MSc 1 ✔ The elderly use more ED services per 1 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario capita than younger individuals, and their 2 Department of Health Policy, Evaluation and Management, University of Toronto rate of use is rising. As the population 3 Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto continues to age, the burden on the ED 4 Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto system may increase. 5 Department of Medicine (Division of Emergency Medicine), University of Toronto ✔ 6 Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto Fewer and fewer physicians are choosing to work in EDs. Those who do, have heavier clinical workloads than before and more specialized training. The opinions, results and conclusions are those of the authors and no endorsement by the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences is intended or should be inferred. Emergency Department Services in Ontario Introduction The ED Physician Workforce 9.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    News Release For Immediate Release December 20, 2012 Patients Spending Less Time in Emergency Departments The Mississauga Halton LHIN is working hand in hand with partners to improve emergency department performance, reduce wait times this holiday season and help people feel better faster. NEWS Mississauga Halton (December 20, 2012) − The Mississauga Halton Local Health Integration Network (LHIN) and health service partners are helping patients spend less time in emergency departments (ED), allowing them to receive treatment faster and return home sooner, freeing up hospital time to treat other patients. Supporting hospitals facing the biggest ED challenges and building on the province’s success of its ED performance improvement program, this year, through the Mississauga Halton LHIN, Ontario is supporting Trillium Health Partners and Halton Healthcare Services with $7,986,400 to improve emergency department performance. Helping patients receive treatment faster in the emergency department is part of Ontario’s Action Plan for Health Care. “The emergency departments at Trillium Health Partners are under a tremendous amount of pressure; receiving over 180,000 visits every year. We need innovative strategies and strong community partnerships to address this demand. This funding will provide some much needed support in helping us achieve that,” said Michelle DiEmanuele, President and CEO, Trillium Health Partners. Recognizing the increased number of ED visits during the holidays, the Mississauga Halton LHIN is also launching its 2012/13 Holiday Surge Protocol – a pilot project developed in collaboration with primary care providers, community services, acute care hospitals and the LHIN – which will be key to managing and influencing the increased number of patients that find themselves in emergency departments at this time of year.
    [Show full text]
  • Having Your Baby At
    HAVING YOUR BABY AT Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Gender Specific Deliveries ......................................................................................................... 2 Prenatal Information .................................................................................................................... 3 General Information (in alphabetical order) .......................................................................... 3 Having the Healthiest Baby Possible ........................................................................................ 6 Childbirth Preparation Classes ................................................................................................... 8 Important Signs to Watch for When You Are Pregnant ..................................................... 8 Breastfeeding Information ......................................................................................................... 9 Making an Informed Decision About Infant Feeding ...................................................... 11 Preparing For Your Hospital Admission.................................................................................. 12 Georgetown Hospital .............................................................................................................. 12 Milton District Hospital ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary of Senior Friendly Care in Mississauga Halton LHIN Hospitals
    A Summary of Senior Friendly Care in Mississauga Halton LHIN Hospitals June 2011 Ken Wong BScPT MSc and Barbara liu MD FRCPC Regional Geriatric Program of Toronto This report was developed as part of the Ontario Senior Friendly Hospital Strategy !"):-: t?ontario Local Health Integration Network Reseau local d'integration des services de sante RGP Senior Friendly Hospitals Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ...... .... .. ............................................................................................................... 3 2. The Ontario Senior Friendly Hospital Strategy in the Mississauga Halton LHIN .............................. 7 2.1 BACKGROUND- THE SENIOR FRIENDLY HOSPITAL STRATEGY IN THE TORONTO CENTRAL LHIN ........................... 7 2.2 THE SENIOR FRIENDLY HOSPITAL STRATEGY IN THE MISSISSAUGA HALTON LHIN .................................................. 7 3. Conceptual Underpinning- The Senior Friendly Hospital Framework ............................................ 9 4. RGP Background Document and Self-assessment Process ............................................................ 10 5. Goals of the Self-assessment Summary ........................................................................... .. .. ........... lO 6. Methods ......................... .. ......................................................................................... ...................... lO 7. Limitations of the Analysis .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Purchasing Group Organization Member 3SO Shared Support
    Member Organization Participants (Ontario) Purchasing Group Organization Member 3SO Shared Support Services Providence Care Mental Health Services Southeastern Ontario 3SO Shared Support Services Providence Care Providence Manor Southeastern Ontario 3SO Shared Support Services Providence Care St Mary’s of the Lake Hospital Southeastern Ontario 3SO Shared Support Services Quinte Health Care Belleville General Hospital Southeastern Ontario 3SO Shared Support Services Quinte Health Care North Hastings Hospital Southeastern Ontario 3SO Shared Support Services Quinte Health Care Prince Edward County Memorial Southeastern Ontario Hospital 3SO Shared Support Services Quinte Health Care Trenton Memorial Hospital Southeastern Ontario 3SO Shared Support Services Brockville General Hospital Southeastern Ontario 3SO Shared Support Services Kingston General Hospital Southeastern Ontario 3SO Shared Support Services Lennox & Addington County Southeastern Ontario Hospital Mohawk Medbuy Corporation Brant Community Health System Brantford General Hospital Mohawk Medbuy Corporation Brant Community Health System Willitt Site Mohawk Medbuy Corporation Niagara Health Greater Niagara General Site Mohawk Medbuy Corporation Niagara Health Douglas Memorial Site Mohawk Medbuy Corporation Niagara Health Niagara-on-the-Lake Site Mohawk Medbuy Corporation Niagara Health Port Colborne Site Mohawk Medbuy Corporation Niagara Health St Catharines Site Mohawk Medbuy Corporation Niagara Health Welland Site Mohawk Medbuy Corporation North Wellington Healthcare Louise Marshall
    [Show full text]