Involvement of STAT5 in Oncogenesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Involvement of STAT5 in Oncogenesis biomedicines Review Involvement of STAT5 in Oncogenesis Clarissa Esmeralda Halim 1, Shuo Deng 1, Mei Shan Ong 1 and Celestial T. Yap 1,2,3,* 1 Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117593, Singapore; [email protected] (C.E.H.); [email protected] (S.D.); [email protected] (M.S.O.) 2 Medical Science Cluster, Cancer Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore 3 National University Cancer Institute, National University Health System, Singapore 119074, Singapore * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +65-6516-3294 Received: 14 July 2020; Accepted: 26 August 2020; Published: 28 August 2020 Abstract: Signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) proteins, and in particular STAT3, have been established as heavily implicated in cancer. Recently, the involvement of STAT5 signalling in the pathology of cancer has been shown to be of increasing importance. STAT5 plays a crucial role in the development of the mammary gland and the homeostasis of the immune system. However, in various cancers, aberrant STAT5 signalling promotes the expression of target genes, such as cyclin D, Bcl-2 and MMP-2, that result in increased cell proliferation, survival and metastasis. To target constitutive STAT5 signalling in cancers, there are several STAT5 inhibitors that can prevent STAT5 phosphorylation, dimerisation, or its transcriptional activity. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that target molecules upstream of STAT5 could also be utilised. Consequently, since STAT5 contributes to tumour aggressiveness and cancer progression, inhibiting STAT5 constitutive activation in cancers that rely on its signalling makes for a promising targeted treatment option. Keywords: STAT5; cancer; metastasis; proliferation; angiogenesis 1. Introduction The signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) family is comprised of seven members, namely STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5a, STAT5b and STAT6 [1–4]. These proteins are transcription factors that are activated upon phosphorylation by Janus kinases (JAKs) in response to cytokine signalling [1,5]. Upon the binding of a cytokine to its receptor, the activated receptor on the cell surface membrane will induce the phosphorylation of JAKs, which will recruit the corresponding STAT protein to activate it by phosphorylation [6–9]. Full activation of the phosphorylated STAT proteins only occurs when they either homo- or heterodimerise, upon which they could form stable tetramers that translocate to the nucleus to bind more efficiently to the interferon gamma activated sites (GAS) of the promoters of STATs-regulated genes [5,7,10–13]. Apart from its activation, the STAT signalling pathway could also be negatively regulated by other proteins, such as phosphatases, the suppressors of cytokine signalling (SOCS) and protein inhibitors of activated STAT (PIAS), which dephosphorylate activated JAKs and STATs, prevent STATs activation by JAKs, and bind activated STATs to GAS sites, respectively [5,14–16]. Several STAT proteins have been found to be linked to the cancer pathology, for example, constitutively activated STAT1, STAT3 and STAT5 have been found in breast, lung, prostate and pancreatic cancers, and other haematological malignancies [17–22]. The upregulation of these STATs signalling pathways promotes tumour growth and survival due to the inhibition of apoptosis, increased cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and dysregulated immune surveillance [17,23–25]. Of these three STAT proteins that are most implicated in cancer, many studies have been focused on the roles of Biomedicines 2020, 8, 316; doi:10.3390/biomedicines8090316 www.mdpi.com/journal/biomedicines Biomedicines 2020, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 20 Biomedicines 2020, 8, 316 2 of 20 on the roles of STAT3 in tumour development [17,26–28]. However, it was only more recently that STAT5 has been shown to play a major role in the tumour progression of several cancers as well. STAT3 in tumour development [17,26–28]. However, it was only more recently that STAT5 has been Therefore, we will be focusing on the implications of constitutive STAT5 signalling in various cancers, shown to play a major role in the tumour progression of several cancers as well. Therefore, we will as well as the therapies available to target it. be focusing on the implications of constitutive STAT5 signalling in various cancers, as well as the therapies available to target it. 2. STAT5 and Its Isoforms 2. STAT5STAT5 and was Its originally Isoforms discovered as a transcription factor of the β-casein gene in lactating mammarySTAT5 cells was and originally was called discovered the mammary as a transcriptiongland factor (MGF) factor [29]. of the Theβ cloning-casein of gene MGF in indicated lactating thatmammary it belonged cells andto the was STAT called family the mammaryof proteins gland and was factor then (MGF) designated [29]. The as ST cloningAT5 [30]. of MGF It is indicateda protein ofthat 794 it belonged amino toacids, the STAT and familycould of be proteins activated and wasby thenprolactin designated (PRL) as STAT5signalling [30]. Itthrough is a protein JAK2 of phosphorylation794 amino acids, andon its could Tyr694 be activatedresidue [29,30]. by prolactin (PRL) signalling through JAK2 phosphorylation on itsFurther Tyr694 molecular residue [29 ,studies30]. have elucidated that two clustered genes on chromosome 17 in humansFurther encode molecular for STAT5. studies The have two elucidatedgenes give that rise two to two clustered different genes isoforms, on chromosome STAT5a and 17 in STAT5b, humans whichencode have for STAT5. more than The two90% genespeptide give sequence rise to two identi difftyerent [31]. isoforms, STAT5a STAT5awas used and to STAT5b,denote the which original have STAT5more than discovered 90% peptide in PRL sequence signalling, identity while [31 STAT5b]. STAT5a is a was protein used with to denote 786 amino the original acids, and STAT5 is phosphorylateddiscovered in PRL on signalling, its Tyr699 whileresidu STAT5be in contrast is a protein to Tyr694 with in 786 STAT5a amino [31]. acids, Both and isoforms is phosphorylated share the sameon its functional Tyr699 residue domains in contrast arrangement, to Tyr694 as shown in STAT5a in Figure [31]. Both1, and isoforms have similar share structures. the same functional Since the twodomains isoforms arrangement, are highly assimilar, shown they in Figure have redund1, and haveant functions similar structures.in regulating Since genes the responsible two isoforms for someare highly cellular similar, processes, they have such redundant as cell proliferation functions inand regulating apoptosis genes [32]. responsibleHowever, due for someto structural cellular differencesprocesses, such on the as C-terminal cell proliferation regions, and they apoptosis also have [32 non-redundant]. However, due functi to structuralons. For example, differences STAT5a on the andC-terminal STAT5b regions, have been they found also haveto be non-redundantassociated with functions.genes modulating For example, neural STAT5a and T-cell and development, STAT5b have respectivelybeen found to[32]. be associated with genes modulating neural and T-cell development, respectively [32]. FigureFigure 1. 1. StructureStructure of of the the STAT5 STAT5 isoforms, isoforms, STAT5a STAT5a and STAT5b. 3. Roles of STAT5 in Physiology 3. Roles of STAT5 in Physiology The activation of STAT5 (Figure2) occurs when ligands responsible for this signalling pathway, The activation of STAT5 (Figure 2) occurs when ligands responsible for this signalling pathway, such as the cytokines interleukin-2 (IL-2) and IL-3, bind to their respective receptors, causing them to such as the cytokines interleukin-2 (IL-2) and IL-3, bind to their respective receptors, causing them to dimerise or multimerise, bringing JAKs into close proximity to transphosphorylate each other as well dimerise or multimerise, bringing JAKs into close proximity to transphosphorylate each other as well as the receptors [14,33–35]. This will recruit STAT5 to the receptors, and they will be phosphorylated on as the receptors [14,33–35]. This will recruit STAT5 to the receptors, and they will be phosphorylated their critical tyrosine residue by the activated JAKs [34,35]. Once they are phosphorylated, STAT5 will on their critical tyrosine residue by the activated JAKs [34,35]. Once they are phosphorylated, STAT5 dimerise with each other, where the SH2 domain of each STAT5 molecule will interact via the will dimerise with each other, where the SH2 domain of each STAT5 molecule will interact via the phospho-tyrosine (pY) residue of the other STAT5 [14,34,35]. The translocation of the fully activated phospho-tyrosine (pY) residue of the other STAT5 [14,34,35]. The translocation of the fully activated STAT5 dimer into the nucleus will then occur, whereby it will bind to GAS elements through its STAT5 dimer into the nucleus will then occur, whereby it will bind to GAS elements through its DNA-binding domain (DBD) [35,36]. Transcriptional regulation of STAT5 target genes, such as those DNA-binding domain (DBD) [35,36]. Transcriptional regulation of STAT5 target genes, such as those that promote cell proliferation, cyclin D and serine/threonine kinase Pim-1, as well as those involved that promote cell proliferation, cyclin D and serine/threonine kinase Pim-1, as well as those involved in apoptosis like Janus kinase-binding protein (JAB), could then be activated
Recommended publications
  • Viral Resistance and IFN Signaling in STAT2 Knockout Fish Cells Carola E
    Viral Resistance and IFN Signaling in STAT2 Knockout Fish Cells Carola E. Dehler, Katherine Lester, Giulia Della Pelle, Luc Jouneau, Armel Houel, Catherine Collins, Tatiana Dovgan, This information is current as Radek Machat, Jun Zou, Pierre Boudinot, Samuel A. M. of September 26, 2021. Martin and Bertrand Collet J Immunol published online 29 May 2019 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/early/2019/05/28/jimmun ol.1801376 Downloaded from Supplementary http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2019/05/28/jimmunol.180137 Material 6.DCSupplemental http://www.jimmunol.org/ Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication by guest on September 26, 2021 *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2019 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. Published May 29, 2019, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1801376 The Journal of Immunology Viral Resistance and IFN Signaling in STAT2 Knockout Fish Cells Carola E. Dehler,* Katherine Lester,† Giulia Della Pelle,‡ Luc Jouneau,‡ Armel Houel,‡ Catherine Collins,† Tatiana Dovgan,*,† Radek Machat,‡,1 Jun Zou,*,2 Pierre Boudinot,‡ Samuel A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Switch from STAT2-IRF9 to ISGF3 Underlies Interferon-Induced Gene Transcription
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10970-y OPEN A molecular switch from STAT2-IRF9 to ISGF3 underlies interferon-induced gene transcription Ekaterini Platanitis 1, Duygu Demiroz1,5, Anja Schneller1,5, Katrin Fischer1, Christophe Capelle1, Markus Hartl 1, Thomas Gossenreiter 1, Mathias Müller2, Maria Novatchkova3,4 & Thomas Decker 1 Cells maintain the balance between homeostasis and inflammation by adapting and inte- grating the activity of intracellular signaling cascades, including the JAK-STAT pathway. Our 1234567890():,; understanding of how a tailored switch from homeostasis to a strong receptor-dependent response is coordinated remains limited. Here, we use an integrated transcriptomic and proteomic approach to analyze transcription-factor binding, gene expression and in vivo proximity-dependent labelling of proteins in living cells under homeostatic and interferon (IFN)-induced conditions. We show that interferons (IFN) switch murine macrophages from resting-state to induced gene expression by alternating subunits of transcription factor ISGF3. Whereas preformed STAT2-IRF9 complexes control basal expression of IFN-induced genes (ISG), both type I IFN and IFN-γ cause promoter binding of a complete ISGF3 complex containing STAT1, STAT2 and IRF9. In contrast to the dogmatic view of ISGF3 formation in the cytoplasm, our results suggest a model wherein the assembly of the ISGF3 complex occurs on DNA. 1 Max Perutz Labs (MPL), University of Vienna, Vienna 1030, Austria. 2 Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna 1210, Austria. 3 Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna 1030, Austria. 4 Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna 1030, Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • An Immunoevasive Strategy Through Clinically-Relevant Pan-Cancer Genomic and Transcriptomic Alterations of JAK-STAT Signaling Components
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/576645; this version posted March 14, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. An immunoevasive strategy through clinically-relevant pan-cancer genomic and transcriptomic alterations of JAK-STAT signaling components Wai Hoong Chang1 and Alvina G. Lai1, 1Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7FZ, United Kingdom Since its discovery almost three decades ago, the Janus ki- Although cytokines are responsible for inflammation in nase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription cancer, spontaneous eradication of tumors by endoge- (STAT) pathway has paved the road for understanding inflam- nous immune processes rarely occurs. Moreover, the matory and immunity processes related to a wide range of hu- dynamic interaction between tumor cells and host immu- man pathologies including cancer. Several studies have demon- nity shields tumors from immunological ablation, which strated the importance of JAK-STAT pathway components in overall limits the efficacy of immunotherapy in the clinic. regulating tumor initiation and metastatic progression, yet, the extent of how genetic alterations influence patient outcome is far from being understood. Focusing on 133 genes involved in Cytokines can be pro- or anti-inflammatory and are inter- JAK-STAT signaling, we found that copy number alterations dependent on each other’s function to maintain immune underpin transcriptional dysregulation that differs within and homeostasis(3).
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Perforin-2 in Regulating Type I Interferon Signaling
    https://www.scientificarchives.com/journal/journal-of-cellular-immunology Journal of Cellular Immunology Review Article Role of Perforin-2 in Regulating Type I Interferon Signaling Gregory V Plano, Noula Shembade* Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA *Correspondence should be addressed to Noula Shembade; [email protected] Received date: November 21, 2020, Accepted date: February 02, 2021 Copyright: © 2021 Plano G, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory response caused by a harmful host immune reaction that is activated in response to microbial infections. Infection-induced type I interferons (IFNs) play critical roles during septic shock. Type I IFNs initiate their biological effects by binding to their transmembrane interferon receptors and initiating the phosphorylation and activation of tyrosine kinases TYK2 and JAK1, which promote phosphorylation and activation of STAT molecules. Type I IFN-induced activation of JAK/STAT pathways is a complex process and not well understood. Improper regulation of type I IFN responses can lead to the development of infectious and inflammation-related diseases, including septic shock, autoimmune diseases, and inflammatory syndromes. This review is mainly focused on the possible mechanistic roles of the transmembrane Perforin-2 molecule in the regulation of type I IFN- induced signaling. Keywords: JAK/STAT, Interferons, TYK2, STATs, Perforin-2, IFNAR1, IFNAR2 and Signaling Introduction and activator of transcription 2), respectively, under normal physiological conditions [4,5].
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes in Human Breast
    www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget/ Oncotarget, 2018, Vol. 9, (No. 2), pp: 2475-2501 Research Paper Identification of differentially expressed genes in human breast cancer cells induced by 4-hydroxyltamoxifen and elucidation of their pathophysiological relevance and mechanisms Qi Fang1, Shuang Yao2, Guanghua Luo2 and Xiaoying Zhang2 1Department of Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, P.R. China 2Comprehensive Laboratory, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, P.R. China Correspondence to: Xiaoying Zhang, email: [email protected] Guanghua Luo, email: [email protected] Keywords: breast cancer; MCF-7; 4-hydroxyl tamoxifen; STAT1; STAT2 Received: June 05, 2017 Accepted: December 13, 2017 Published: December 20, 2017 Copyright: Fang et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. ABSTRACT While tamoxifen (TAM) is used for treating estrogen receptor (ER)a-positive breast cancer patients, its anti-breast cancer mechanisms are not completely elucidated. This study aimed to examine effects of 4-hydroxyltamoxifen (4-OH- TAM) on ER-positive (ER+) breast cancer MCF-7 cell growth and gene expression profiles. MCF-7 cell growth was inhibited by 4-OH-TAM dose-dependently with IC50 of 29 μM. 332 genes were up-regulated while 320 genes were down-regulated. The mRNA levels of up-regulated genes including STAT1, STAT2, EIF2AK2, TGM2, DDX58, PARP9, SASH1, RBL2 and USP18 as well as down-regulated genes including CCDN1, S100A9, S100A8, ANXA1 and PGR were confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT- PCR).
    [Show full text]
  • Vs. BCR-ABL-Positive Cells to Interferon Alpha
    Schubert et al. Journal of Hematology & Oncology (2019) 12:36 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-019-0722-9 RESEARCH Open Access Differential roles of STAT1 and STAT2 in the sensitivity of JAK2V617F- vs. BCR-ABL- positive cells to interferon alpha Claudia Schubert1, Manuel Allhoff2, Stefan Tillmann1, Tiago Maié2, Ivan G. Costa2, Daniel B. Lipka3, Mirle Schemionek1, Kristina Feldberg1, Julian Baumeister1, Tim H. Brümmendorf1, Nicolas Chatain1† and Steffen Koschmieder1*† Abstract Background: Interferon alpha (IFNa) monotherapy is recommended as the standard therapy in polycythemia vera (PV) but not in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Here, we investigated the mechanisms of IFNa efficacy in JAK2V617F- vs. BCR-ABL-positive cells. Methods: Gene expression microarrays and RT-qPCR of PV vs. CML patient PBMCs and CD34+ cells and of the murine cell line 32D expressing JAK2V617F or BCR-ABL were used to analyze and compare interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) expression. Furthermore, using CRISPR/Cas9n technology, targeted disruption of STAT1 or STAT2, respectively, was performed in 32D-BCR-ABL and 32D-JAK2V617F cells to evaluate the role of these transcription factors for IFNa efficacy. The knockout cell lines were reconstituted with STAT1, STAT2, STAT1Y701F, or STAT2Y689F to analyze the importance of wild-type and phosphomutant STATs for the IFNa response. ChIP-seq and ChIP were performed to correlate histone marks with ISG expression. Results: Microarray analysis and RT-qPCR revealed significant upregulation of ISGs in 32D-JAK2V617F but downregulation in 32D-BCR-ABL cells, and these effects were reversed by tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. Similar expression patterns were confirmed in human cell lines, primary PV and CML patient PBMCs and CD34+ cells, demonstrating that these effects are operational in patients.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dual Cis-Regulatory Code Links IRF8 to Constitutive and Inducible Gene Expression in Macrophages
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 1, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press A dual cis-regulatory code links IRF8 to constitutive and inducible gene expression in macrophages Alessandra Mancino,1,3 Alberto Termanini,1,3 Iros Barozzi,1 Serena Ghisletti,1 Renato Ostuni,1 Elena Prosperini,1 Keiko Ozato,2 and Gioacchino Natoli1 1Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), 20139 Milan, Italy; 2Laboratory of Molecular Growth Regulation, Genomics of Differentiation Program, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA The transcription factor (TF) interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8) controls both developmental and inflammatory stimulus-inducible genes in macrophages, but the mechanisms underlying these two different functions are largely unknown. One possibility is that these different roles are linked to the ability of IRF8 to bind alternative DNA sequences. We found that IRF8 is recruited to distinct sets of DNA consensus sequences before and after lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. In resting cells, IRF8 was mainly bound to composite sites together with the master regulator of myeloid development PU.1. Basal IRF8–PU.1 binding maintained the expression of a broad panel of genes essential for macrophage functions (such as microbial recognition and response to purines) and contributed to basal expression of many LPS-inducible genes. After LPS stimulation, increased expression of IRF8, other IRFs, and AP-1 family TFs enabled IRF8 binding to thousands of additional regions containing low-affinity multimerized IRF sites and composite IRF–AP-1 sites, which were not premarked by PU.1 and did not contribute to the basal IRF8 cistrome.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of STAT5 on Inflammation-Related Gene Expression in Diabetic Mouse
    The Effect of STAT5 on Inflammation-Related Gene Expression in Diabetic Mouse Kidneys A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science Samantha J. Shaw May 2014 © 2014 Samantha J. Shaw. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled The Effect of STAT5 on Inflammation-Related Gene Expression in Diabetic Mouse Kidneys by SAMANTHA J. SHAW has been approved for the Department of Biological Sciences and the College of Arts and Sciences by Karen T. Coschigano Associate Professor of Biomedical Sciences Robert Frank Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT SHAW, SAMANTHA J., M.S., May 2014, Biological Sciences The Effect of STAT5 on Inflammation-Related Gene Expression in Diabetic Mouse Kidneys Director of Thesis: Karen T. Coschigano Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease and renal failure in humans. The molecular pathways that lead to DN are not well known. This research investigates possible roles of several signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) proteins in this disease using a STAT5A/B knockout (SKO) mouse model. Based on previous observations of increased inflammation-related gene expression in the kidneys of diabetic SKO mice, the hypothesis of the current project was that the combination of the loss of STAT5 repression and increase of STAT3 activity escalates inflammation-related gene expression in the kidneys of diabetic SKO mice. In support of this hypothesis, an increase of IRF-1 RNA expression, reflective of the loss of STAT5 repression, was observed in the kidneys of diabetic SKO mice.
    [Show full text]
  • Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Development Is Regulated by a STAT/IRF-8 Axis
    Myeloid-derived suppressor cell development is regulated by a STAT/IRF-8 axis Jeremy D. Waight, … , Kebin Liu, Scott I. Abrams J Clin Invest. 2013;123(10):4464-4478. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI68189. Research Article Immunology Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) comprise immature myeloid populations produced in diverse pathologies, including neoplasia. Because MDSCs can impair antitumor immunity, these cells have emerged as a significant barrier to cancer therapy. Although much research has focused on how MDSCs promote tumor progression, it remains unclear how MDSCs develop and why the MDSC response is heavily granulocytic. Given that MDSCs are a manifestation of aberrant myelopoiesis, we hypothesized that MDSCs arise from perturbations in the regulation of interferon regulatory factor–8 (IRF-8), an integral transcriptional component of myeloid differentiation and lineage commitment. Overall, we demonstrated that (a) Irf8-deficient mice generated myeloid populations highly homologous to tumor-induced MDSCs with respect to phenotype, function, and gene expression profiles; (b) IRF-8 overexpression in mice attenuated MDSC accumulation and enhanced immunotherapeutic efficacy; (c) the MDSC-inducing factors G-CSF and GM-CSF facilitated IRF-8 downregulation via STAT3- and STAT5-dependent pathways; and (d) IRF-8 levels in MDSCs of breast cancer patients declined with increasing MDSC frequency, implicating IRF-8 as a negative regulator in human MDSC biology. Together, our results reveal a previously unrecognized role for IRF-8 expression in MDSC subset development, which may provide new avenues to target MDSCs in neoplasia. Find the latest version: https://jci.me/68189/pdf Research article Myeloid-derived suppressor cell development is regulated by a STAT/IRF-8 axis Jeremy D.
    [Show full text]
  • Modulation of STAT Signaling by STAT-Interacting Proteins
    Oncogene (2000) 19, 2638 ± 2644 ã 2000 Macmillan Publishers Ltd All rights reserved 0950 ± 9232/00 $15.00 www.nature.com/onc Modulation of STAT signaling by STAT-interacting proteins K Shuai*,1 1Departments of Medicine and Biological Chemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, California, CA 90095, USA STATs (signal transducer and activator of transcription) play important roles in numerous cellular processes Interaction with non-STAT transcription factors including immune responses, cell growth and dierentia- tion, cell survival and apoptosis, and oncogenesis. In Studies on the promoters of a number of IFN-a- contrast to many other cellular signaling cascades, the induced genes identi®ed a conserved DNA sequence STAT pathway is direct: STATs bind to receptors at the named ISRE (interferon-a stimulated response element) cell surface and translocate into the nucleus where they that mediates IFN-a response (Darnell, 1997; Darnell function as transcription factors to trigger gene activa- et al., 1994). Stat1 and Stat2, the ®rst known members tion. However, STATs do not act alone. A number of of the STAT family, were identi®ed in the transcription proteins are found to be associated with STATs. These complex ISGF-3 (interferon-stimulated gene factor 3) STAT-interacting proteins function to modulate STAT that binds to ISRE (Fu et al., 1990, 1992; Schindler et signaling at various steps and mediate the crosstalk of al., 1992). ISGF-3 consists of a Stat1:Stat2 heterodimer STATs with other cellular signaling pathways. This and a non-STAT protein named p48, a member of the article reviews the roles of STAT-interacting proteins in IRF (interferon regulated factor) family (Levy, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Batf3 and Id2 Have a Synergistic Effect on Irf8-Directed Classical Cd8α+ Dendritic Cell Development
    Batf3 and Id2 Have a Synergistic Effect on Irf8-Directed Classical CD8α+ Dendritic Cell Development This information is current as Hemant Jaiswal, Monika Kaushik, Rachid Sougrat, Monica of October 3, 2021. Gupta, Anup Dey, Rohit Verma, Keiko Ozato and Prafullakumar Tailor J Immunol 2013; 191:5993-6001; Prepublished online 13 November 2013; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1203541 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/191/12/5993 Downloaded from Supplementary http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2013/11/13/jimmunol.120354 Material 1.DC1 http://www.jimmunol.org/ References This article cites 57 articles, 38 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/191/12/5993.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision by guest on October 3, 2021 • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology Batf3 and Id2 Have a Synergistic Effect on Irf8-Directed Classical CD8a+ Dendritic Cell Development Hemant Jaiswal,* Monika Kaushik,* Rachid Sougrat,† Monica Gupta,‡ Anup Dey,‡ Rohit Verma,* Keiko Ozato,‡ and Prafullakumar Tailor* Dendritic cells (DCs) are heterogeneous cell populations represented by different subtypes, each varying in terms of gene expression patterns and specific functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Untwining Anti-Tumor and Immunosuppressive Effects of JAK Inhibitors—A Strategy for Hematological Malignancies?
    cancers Review Untwining Anti-Tumor and Immunosuppressive Effects of JAK Inhibitors—A Strategy for Hematological Malignancies? Klara Klein 1, Dagmar Stoiber 2, Veronika Sexl 1 and Agnieszka Witalisz-Siepracka 1,2,* 1 Department of Biomedical Science, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, 1210 Vienna, Austria; [email protected] (K.K.); [email protected] (V.S.) 2 Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Microbiology, Division Pharmacology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, 3500 Krems, Austria; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Simple Summary: The Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway is aberrantly activated in many malignancies. Inhibition of this pathway via JAK inhibitors (JAKinibs) is therefore an attractive therapeutic strategy underlined by Ruxolitinib (JAK1/2 inhibitor) being approved for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms. As a consequence of the crucial role of the JAK-STAT pathway in the regulation of immune responses, inhibition of JAKs suppresses the immune system. This review article provides a thorough overview of the current knowledge on JAKinibs’ effects on immune cells in the context of hematological malignancies. We also discuss the potential use of JAKinibs for the treatment of diseases in which lymphocytes are the source of the malignancy. Citation: Klein, K.; Stoiber, D.; Sexl, Abstract: The Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway V.; Witalisz-Siepracka, A. Untwining propagates signals from a variety of cytokines, contributing to cellular responses in health and disease. Anti-Tumor and Immunosuppressive Gain of function mutations in JAKs or STATs are associated with malignancies, with JAK2V617F being Effects of JAK Inhibitors—A Strategy the main driver mutation in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN).
    [Show full text]