South Pacif Ic Ocean South Pacif Ic Ocean

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

South Pacif Ic Ocean South Pacif Ic Ocean 125°0'0"W 130°0'0"W 135°0'0"W 140°0'0"W 145°0'0"W 150°0'0"W MCCUDDIN Putzke Pk. Navarre�e Pk. MOUNTAINS 80°0'0"S Mt. Flint HOBBS COAST FLOOD Getz Hu� Pk. I c Dean Mt. Andrus e Island Bursey The Blob Mt. Kosciusko Icefalls S BROWN R h e VALLEY Kohler A l f Mt. Kauffman Dome N Moulton Mt. Moulton G H Mt. Siple S A Icefalls CLARK MACKAY I E Mt. E N Mt. Berlin Mt. Maglione Hammond Glacier Palombo MTS. G E MTS. S 79°0'0"S 73°0'0"S Fields Pk. Mt. Atwood N M Mt. Van Berlin ALLEGHENY A O der Veer Shibuya Pk. Crevasse Mt. Zeigler U Mt. Darling N McKinley Pk. Grant Field MTS. B r Poindexter Pk. oy Mt. West T Island A Kennel Pk. Mt. Cr ow R d Linwood Pk. I Glacie Arthur Glacier Glacie N Mt. Obiglio rry Peacock Pk. e SW S B K D Alexander Pk. r ir RUPPERT COAST Mt. Mt. Pe�nos kp R A r a MTS. N Kohler t Mt. Steinfeld O SON Forrester Venzke Glacier r Glacie ic Kramer Orr Island Shepard Johnson Gl. k r F Mt. Edwards Walgreen H Island Mt. Rubin de e Sulzberger iel Island G Gl. Pk. Island u i Greer Pk. K la Borabolla l y Siemiatkowski Glacier Ice Shelf Mt. Butler . c l White Glacier Cr Lichen Pk. l ev a ass Mt. Paterson Steventon ube e V A Mt. Petrides G l alle Saunders Mt. L Drummond Pk. R Mt. Balchen Glacier y G Island E Mt. Nilsen l Ma�konis Pk. Mt. Perkins la Moody Dalton Gl.X a c Mt. Gray Giles FOSDICK CHESTERMTS. iMTS.e Eilefsen Pk. A c McGaw Pk. r Island N Mt. Shideler i D e ICKES MTS. R Mt. Frazier r Mt. McCoy Mt. Dane G A Frostman Glacier Mt. Vance Mt. Langway Mt. Carbone PHILLIPS MTS. Kizer d Island M La Gorce Pk. 78°0'0"S n Mt. Paige Mutel Pk. TS. a T Hull Butler S L Mt. Shirley Blake Pk. Swarm Pk. Cronenwett Gl. O A Bay Mt. June Maige�er Pk. Hutchinson Island C Richter Gl. Richter Bruner Hill Island Mt. Swadener Gl. Richter Land Mt. Peddie Bay Mitchell Pk. Vollmer M t. Youngman S O Island U T Groves Driscoll S Fisher H Island Island R Island 72°0'0"S E P D A N C U I F Newman A I Island S C O C 77°0'0"S E A Sulzberger N Bay 135°0'0"W 140°0'0"W 145°0'0"W 150°0'0"W 155°0'0"W 160°0'0"W Scale 1:2,500,000 when printed at 17” x 11” Count 47345 Central Meridian: 180° Standard Parallel: 71°S 2 WGS84 Antarctic Polar Stereographic Projection Sum (km ) 14755567.3 2 Dissolve (km ) 561666.60 Collection Year 2005 - 2019 Placenames: SCAR Composite Gazetter of Antarctica 0 100 200 Basemap Imagery: 15 m Landsat Image Mosaic of Kilometers Antarctica (LIMA) provided by USGS, NSF, NASA, Cartography by Hitomi Nakamura Miles BAS; MODIS South Pole Mosaic provided by NASA Polar Geospatial Center - University of Minnesota 0 100 200.
Recommended publications
  • Alaska Range
    Alaska Range Introduction The heavily glacierized Alaska Range consists of a number of adjacent and discrete mountain ranges that extend in an arc more than 750 km long (figs. 1, 381). From east to west, named ranges include the Nutzotin, Mentas- ta, Amphitheater, Clearwater, Tokosha, Kichatna, Teocalli, Tordrillo, Terra Cotta, and Revelation Mountains. This arcuate mountain massif spans the area from the White River, just east of the Canadian Border, to Merrill Pass on the western side of Cook Inlet southwest of Anchorage. Many of the indi- Figure 381.—Index map of vidual ranges support glaciers. The total glacier area of the Alaska Range is the Alaska Range showing 2 approximately 13,900 km (Post and Meier, 1980, p. 45). Its several thousand the glacierized areas. Index glaciers range in size from tiny unnamed cirque glaciers with areas of less map modified from Field than 1 km2 to very large valley glaciers with lengths up to 76 km (Denton (1975a). Figure 382.—Enlargement of NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) image mosaic of the Alaska Range in summer 1995. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration image mosaic from Mike Fleming, Alaska Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska. The numbers 1–5 indicate the seg- ments of the Alaska Range discussed in the text. K406 SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD and Field, 1975a, p. 575) and areas of greater than 500 km2. Alaska Range glaciers extend in elevation from above 6,000 m, near the summit of Mount McKinley, to slightly more than 100 m above sea level at Capps and Triumvi- rate Glaciers in the southwestern part of the range.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Place Names in Northern East Greenland
    Catalogue of place names in northern East Greenland In this section all officially approved, and many Greenlandic names are spelt according to the unapproved, names are listed, together with explana- modern Greenland orthography (spelling reform tions where known. Approved names are listed in 1973), with cross-references from the old-style normal type or bold type, whereas unapproved spelling still to be found on many published maps. names are always given in italics. Names of ships are Prospectors place names used only in confidential given in small CAPITALS. Individual name entries are company reports are not found in this volume. In listed in Danish alphabetical order, such that names general, only selected unapproved names introduced beginning with the Danish letters Æ, Ø and Å come by scientific or climbing expeditions are included. after Z. This means that Danish names beginning Incomplete documentation of climbing activities with Å or Aa (e.g. Aage Bertelsen Gletscher, Aage de by expeditions claiming ‘first ascents’ on Milne Land Lemos Dal, Åkerblom Ø, Ålborg Fjord etc) are found and in nunatak regions such as Dronning Louise towards the end of this catalogue. Å replaced aa in Land, has led to a decision to exclude them. Many Danish spelling for most purposes in 1948, but aa is recent expeditions to Dronning Louise Land, and commonly retained in personal names, and is option- other nunatak areas, have gained access to their al in some Danish town names (e.g. Ålborg or Aalborg region of interest using Twin Otter aircraft, such that are both correct). However, Greenlandic names be - the remaining ‘climb’ to the summits of some peaks ginning with aa following the spelling reform dating may be as little as a few hundred metres; this raises from 1973 (a long vowel sound rather than short) are the question of what constitutes an ‘ascent’? treated as two consecutive ‘a’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Schneeeigenschaften Und Gletscherzonen Der Antarktischen Halbinsel Im Radarbild
    Schneeeigenschaften und Gletscherzonen der Antarktischen Halbinsel im Radarbild Thermische Phänomene der Schnee- und Firndecken im Hinterland der großen Schelfeisabbrüche Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Fakultät für Forst- und Umweltwissenschaften der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg i. Brsg. vorgelegt von Frank Rau Freiburg im Breisgau 2004 Dekan: Prof. Dr. E. Hildebrand Referent: Prof. Dr. H. Goßmann 1. Korreferent: Prof. Dr. H. Müller 2. Korreferent: Prof. Dr. E. Parlow Tag der Disputation: 19. Mai 2004 AN ANTARCTIC EXPEDITION IS THE WORST WAY TO HAVE THE BEST TIME OF YOUR LIFE Eintrag im Hüttenbuch Stonington, Marguerite Bay, Graham Land (68E 11' Süd, 67E 00' West) Auch wenn eine Expedition in die Antarktis heutzutage nicht mehr eine solche physische und logistische Herausforderung darstellt wie zu den Zeiten Apsley Cherry-Garrards, auf den dieses Zitat zurückgeht, so gehören Geländearbeiten auf der Antarktischen Halbinsel sicherlich zum spannendsten und eindrücklichsten was man als Geograph erleben kann. In diesem Sinne zählen die drei Feldkampagnen in der inneren Marguerite Bay und auf den South Shetland Islands, an denen ich in den vergangenen Jahren teilnehmen konnte, zu den großen und prägenden Erlebnissen. Die dabei vor Ort erworbenen Kenntnisse und erhobenen Daten bilden die Grundlage meiner hier vorgestellten Arbeit, auch wenn sie nicht unmittelbar in deren Mittelpunkt stehen. Im besonderen Maße möchte ich mich bei Herrn Prof. Dr. H. Goßmann für die Möglichkeit der Teilnahme an diesen Kampagnen und für die Betreuung dieser Promotion bedanken. Mit großer Geduld und einer Begeisterung für das Thema, die zeitweilig die meinige deut- lich überstieg, trug er mit seiner Unterstützung wesentlich zum Gelingen der Arbeit bei.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Structure and Dynamics of the Lambert Glacier-Amery Ice Shelf System: Implications for the Origin of Prydz Bay Sediments1
    Barron, J., Larsen, B., et al., 1991 Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, Vol. 119 5. STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS OF THE LAMBERT GLACIER-AMERY ICE SHELF SYSTEM: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ORIGIN OF PRYDZ BAY SEDIMENTS1 Michael J. Hambrey2 ABSTRACT Depositional processes in Prydz Bay during the past 40 m.y. or so have been strongly influenced by glacier ice. Therefore, to understand these processes better, and to define the source areas of the sediment, it is necessary to deter- mine the role of the different ice masses entering the bay. Ice thickness, topography, and ice velocity data indicate that the Lambert Glacier-Amery Ice Shelf system is one of the most important routes for the discharge of ice from the East Antarctic Ice Sheet, and in the past has been the dominant influence on sedimentation in Prydz Bay. Most of the flow is concentrated through the Lambert Graben, which has been overdeepened to a depth of 2500 m below sea level. Glacio- logical work has indicated that close to the grounding line there is considerable melting, but from a short distance sea- ward of this position, basal freeze-on of ice of oceanic origin occurs. Thus nearly all the basal debris load in the Lam- bert Glacier system may be deposited close to the grounding line, and that there is probably negligible deposition be- neath the major part of the Amery Ice Shelf. Englacial debris, delivered to the open sea through the interior of the ice shelf, will be deposited from icebergs. There have been conflicting reports concerning the dynamics of the Lambert Glacier-Amery Ice Shelf system.
    [Show full text]
  • Chugach Mountains
    Chugach Mountains Introduction The Chugach Mountains are a 400×95-km-wide mountain range that ex- tends from Turnagain Arm and Knik Arm on the west to the eastern tributar- ies of Bering Glacier, Tana Glacier, and Tana River on the east. On the north, the Chugach Mountains are bounded by the Chitina, Copper, and Matanuska Rivers. On the south, they are bounded by the northern Gulf of Alaska and Prince William Sound. The Chugach Mountains contain about one-third of the present glacierized area of Alaska (figs. 1, 2, 182) — 21,600 km2, accord- ing to Post and Meier (1980, p. 45) — and include one of the largest glaciers in continental North America. Bering Glacier is a piedmont outlet glacier with an approximate area of 5,200 km2 (Viens, 1995; Molnia, 2001, p.73) (table 2). The eastern part of the Chugach Mountains is covered by a continuous series of connected glaciers and accumulation areas (Field, 1975b). Several studies have characterized this region and adjacent regions as areas expe- riencing a significant 20th century retreat of its glaciers (Meier, 1984; Mol- nia and Post, 1995; Arendt and others, 2002; Meier and Dyurgerov, 2002). A study by Sauber and others (2000) examined the effect of this regional ice loss on crustal deformation in the eastern Chugach Mountains. Recogniz- ing that the range of annual thinning of glaciers in this region ranges from 1–6 m a–1, they calculated that uplift in ablation regions of these glaciers ranges from 1 to12 mm a–1, the greatest uplift being located just east of the Chugach Mountains, in the Icy Bay region.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharp, M., & Tranter, M. (2017). Glacier Biogeochemistry. Geochemical Perspectives, 6(2), 173-339
    Sharp, M., & Tranter, M. (2017). Glacier Biogeochemistry. Geochemical Perspectives, 6(2), 173-339. https://doi.org/10.7185/geochempersp.6.2 Peer reviewed version Link to published version (if available): 10.7185/geochempersp.6.2 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via European Association of Geochemistry at DOI: 10.7185/geochempersp.6.2. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Glacier Biogeochemistry PREFACE (MS and MT) Martin (MS) and I (MT) have been encouraged to write this volume of Geochemical Perspectives in a travelogue style, sketching out the research terrain we entered and encountered as post-graduates, and then relating why we tackled particular problems in the order we did. We have been encouraged to acknowledge the wisdom of our mentors, peers, post-docs and post-graduates along the journey, which has been a great pleasure. We feel we are nowhere near our final destination as yet - there are paradigm shifts occurring in the field of glacier biogeochemistry even as we write – and we hope that this is a stimulus for early career researchers who may read this manuscript. We further hope that the story of the origins of the study of glacier biogeochemistry that we narrate will capture your imagination, as it did ours, and that we can convince you that glaciers and ice sheets are important and dynamic components of the Earth system.
    [Show full text]
  • New Antarctic Place Names
    New antarctic place names FRED G. ALBERTS Geographic Names Division Defense Mapping Agency Topographic Center Washington, D. C. 20315 This listing makes available the antarctic name visory committee are Walter R. Seelig, chairman (Na- decisions of the U.S. Board on Geographic Names, tional Science Foundation), Alison Wilson (National concurred in by the Secretary of the Interior, since the Archives), William R. MacDonald (U.S. Geological publication of Gazetteer No. 14: Antarctica, Third Survey), Cdr. Jerome R. Pilon (U.S. Navy), and Edition, Official Name Decisions of the United States Richard R. Randall (ex officio, Board on Geographic Board on Geographic Names (Geographic Names Names). The members serve as individuals with Division, U.S. Army Topographic Command, special knowledge, not as representatives of agencies. Washington, D.C. 20315, June 1969). The names are Others who have served on the committee since June those approved through December 1976. 1969 are Kenneth J . Bertrand (Catholic University of The list includes approximately 1,600 new names, America), Meredith F. Burrill (ex officio, Board on together with a small number of amended names, and Geographic Names), Albert P. Crary (National should be used as a supplement to the Gazetteer. The Science Foundation), Henry M. Dater (U.S. Naval names are arranged alphabetically, with the specific Support Force, Antarctica), Herman R. Friis (Na- element first. Their geographic positions have been tional Archives), Cdr. Kelsey B. Goodman (U.S. taken from the most reliable sources available. Those Navy), and Morton J . Rubin (U.S. Weather Bureau). marked with a dagger (t) are listed in Gazetteer No.
    [Show full text]
  • References Cited
    References Cited Abercrombie, W.R., 1900, Supplementary expedition into the Armentrout, J.M., 1983, Glacial lithofacies of the Neogene Yakata- Copper River Valley, Alaska, in Compilation of narratives of ga Formation, Robinson Mountains, southern Alaska, Coast explorations in Alaska, part A: Washington, D.C., Government Range, in Molnia, B.F., ed., 1981, Glacial-marine sedimenta- Printing Office, 169 p. tion: New York, Plenum Press, p. 629–665. Aðalgeirsdóttir, G., Echelmeyer, K.A., and Harrison, W.D., 1998, Bagley, J.W., 1917, The use of the panoramic camera in topograph- Elevation and volume changes on the Harding Icefield, Alaska: ic surveying: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 657, 88 p. Journal of Glaciology, v. 44, 148, p. 570–582. Bahr, D.B., 1997, Global distributions of glacier properties: A sto- Allen, C.R., and Smith, G.I., 1953, Seismic and gravity investiga- chastic scaling paradigm: Water Resources Research, v. 33, tions on the Malaspina Glacier, Alaska: Transactions, Ameri- no. 7, p. 1669–1679. can Geophysical Union, v. 34, no. 5, p. 755–760. Bahr, D.B. and Meier, M.F., 2000, Snow patch and glacier size dis- Allen, H.T., 1887, Report of an expedition to the Copper, Tanana, tribution: Water Resources Research, v. 36, no. 2, p. 495–501. and Koyukuk Rivers, in the Territory of Alaska, in the year Bailey, Palmer, Fleisher, P.J., Mankoff, Evan, and Senglaub, Mi- 1885, for the purpose of obtaining all information which will chael, 2000, An evolving ice-contact proglacial lake, Sheridan be valuable and important, especially to the military branch of Glacier, Alaska [abs.]: Geological Society of America, Ab- the government: Washington, D.C., Government Printing Of- stracts with Programs, v.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of the Antarctic
    NOIJ.VQNn OJ3ON3133^1 VNOI±VN r o CO ] ] Q) 1 £Q> : 0) >J N , CO O The National Science Foundation has TDD (Telephonic Device for the Deaf) capability, which enables individuals with hearing impairment to communicate with the Division of Personnel and Management about NSF programs, employment, or general information. This number is (202) 357-7492. GAZETTEER OF THE ANTARCTIC Fourth Edition names approved by the UNITED STATES BOARD ON GEOGRAPHIC NAMES a cooperative project of the DEFENSE MAPPING AGENCY Hydrographic/Topographic Center Washington, D. C. 20315 UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY National Mapping Division Reston, Virginia 22092 NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Division of Polar Programs Washington, D. C. 20550 1989 STOCK NO. GAZGNANTARCS UNITED STATES BOARD ON GEOGRAPHIC NAMES Rupert B. Southard, Chairman Ralph E. Ehrenberg, Vice Chairman Richard R. Randall, Executive Secretary Department of Agriculture .................................................... Sterling J. Wilcox, member Donald D. Loff, deputy Anne Griesemer, deputy Department of Commerce .................................................... Charles E. Harrington, member Richard L. Forstall, deputy Henry Tom, deputy Edward L. Gates, Jr., deputy Department of Defense ....................................................... Thomas K. Coghlan, member Carl Nelius, deputy Lois Winneberger, deputy Department of the Interior .................................................... Rupert B. Southard, member Tracy A. Fortmann, deputy David E. Meier, deputy Joel L. Morrison, deputy Department
    [Show full text]
  • View PDF File
    Volume 40, Number 2 September 2017 Curator’s Comments A periodical issued by the Meteorite Kevin Righter, NASA-JSC Working Group to inform scientists of the basic characteristics of specimens This newsletter reports 222 new meteorites from the 2014, 2015 and 2016 recovered in the Antarctic. ANSMET seasons from Dominion Range (DOM14), Miller Range (MIL15), Edited by Cecilia Satterwhite and Kevin and Elephant Moraine (EET16). Meteorites include eight CK, seven CM2, Righter, NASA Johnson Space Center, one CM1, one CM1/2, two CV3, one EH3, one H impact melt chondrite, as Houston, Texas 77058 well as three IAB irons, two howardites, one diogenite, one acapulcoite, one winonaite, and one ureilite. The presence of a large L chondrite shower amongst the DOM samples continues (Righter et al., LPSC 2017 abstract # 2396); we are in the process Inside this Issue of updating classifications of all DOM equilibrated ordinary chondrites, so Curator’s Comments...................1 those interested in this collection area should be forewarned that the classi- New Meteorites...........................4 fications may change in the near future. Many of the Elephant Moraine Location Abbreviations samples announced here are possibly paired with samples collected in pre- and Map................................4 Table 1: Newly Classified vious seasons and so those interested should consider this carefully. For Antarctic Meteorites................5 example, there are previous pairing groups from EET for CK, CM, diogenite, Table 2: Newly Classified howardite, IAB irons. We will update pairings as necessary as more infor- Meteorites by Type................10 mation becomes available for these samples. Notes to Tables 1 & 2..................10 Table 3: Pairing..........................12 Reminder to acknowledge samples received from NASA-JSC Petrographic Descriptions..........13 When publishing results of your research, please include the split numbers Sample Request Guidelines........18 used in the research.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial and Temporal Variability of Glacier Melt in the Mcmurdo Dry
    Spatial and Temporal Variability of Glacier Melt in the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica by Matthew James Hoffman A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Sciences and Resources: Geology Dissertation Committee: Andrew G. Fountain, Chair Scott Burns Christina Hulbe Martin Lafrenz Glen Liston Alan Yeakley Portland State University © 2011 Abstract In the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Victoria Land, East Antarctica, melting of glacial ice is the primary source of water to streams, lakes, and associated ecosystems. To better understand meltwater production, three hypotheses are tested: 1) that small changes in the surface energy balance on these glaciers will result in large changes in melt, 2) that subsurface melt does not contribute significantly to runoff, and 3) that melt from 25-m high terminal cliffs is the dominant source of baseflow during cold periods. These hypotheses were investigated using a surface energy balance model applied to the glaciers of Taylor Valley using 14 years of meteorological data and calibrated to ablation measurements. Inclusion of transmission of solar radiation into the ice through a source term in a one-dimensional heat transfer equation was necessary to accurately model summer ablation and ice temperatures. Results showed good correspondence between calculated and measured ablation and ice temperatures over the 14 years using both daily and hourly time steps, but an hourly time step allowed resolution of short duration melt events and melt within the upper 15 cm of the ice. Resolution of short duration melt events was not important for properly resolving seasonal ablation totals.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacier Crevasses: Observations, Models, and Mass 10.1002/2015RG000504 Balance Implications
    PUBLICATIONS Reviews of Geophysics REVIEW ARTICLE Glacier crevasses: Observations, models, and mass 10.1002/2015RG000504 balance implications Key Points: William Colgan1,2, Harihar Rajaram3, Waleed Abdalati2, Cheryl McCutchan4, Ruth Mottram5, • Sixty years of research have transformed 2 2 our understanding of crevasses Mahsa S. Moussavi , and Shane Grigsby • Crevasse geometry and advection 1 2 appear less related than once Department of Earth and Space Sciences and Engineering, York University, Toronto, Ontaro, Canada, Cooperative 3 assumed Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, Colorado, USA, Department of Civil, Architectural and • Crevasses influence glacier mass Environmental Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 4Animedia Science, Boulder, Colorado, balance via at least 10 mechanisms USA, 5Danish Meteorological Institute, Lyngby, Denmark Abstract We review the findings of approximately 60 years of in situ and remote sensing studies of glacier Correspondence to: W. Colgan, crevasses, as well as the three broad classes of numerical models now employed to simulate crevasse [email protected] fracture. The relatively new insight that mixed-mode fracture in local stress equilibrium, rather than downstream advection alone, can introduce nontrivial curvature to crevasse geometry may merit the Citation: reinterpretation of some key historical observation studies. In the past three decades, there have been Colgan, W., H. Rajaram, W. Abdalati, tremendous advances in the spatial resolution of satellite imagery, as well as fully automated algorithms C. McCutchan, R. Mottram, M. S. Moussavi, capable of tracking crevasse displacements between repeat images. Despite considerable advances in and S. Grigsby (2016), Glacier crevasses: Observations, models, and mass balance developing fully transient three-dimensional ice flow models over the past two decades, both the zero stress implications, Rev.
    [Show full text]