DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2077

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2077 Geochemical Signatures of Silver and Gold Depo~its, Tonopah.l,0 X,2° Qu.adrangle, Nevada~ Description and Applications to Exploration ~ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2077 Geochemical Signatures of Silver and Gold Deposits, Tonopah 1 °X 2 o Quadrangle, Nevada- Description and Applications to Exploration By J. Thomas Nash U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2077 Geochemical signatures of six geologically defined deposit types are distinctive and pennit classification ofprospects and estimation of likely grade and tonnage UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For Sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Map Distribution Box 25286, MS 306, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Nash, J. Thomas (John Thomas), 1941- Geochemical signatures of silver and gold deposits, Tonopah 1° x 2° quadrangle, Nevada: description and applications to exploration I by J. Thomas Nash. p. cm.-(U.S. Geological Survey bulletin: 2077) Includes bibliographical references (p. ). Supt. of Docs. no. :I 19.3:2077 1. Gold mines and mining-Nevada-Tonopah region. 2. Gold mines and mining-Nevada-Tonopah region. I. Title. II. Series. QE75.B9 no. 2077 557.3 s-dc20 93-44201 [553.4'1'09793] CIP CONTENTS Abstract. ................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 Silver and Gold Deposits in the Tonopah Quadrangle ......................................................... 3 Classification and Models of Silver-Gold Deposits ............................................................. 4 Geochemical Studies ............................................................................................................ 6 Saillpling ....................................................................................................................... 6 Saillple Preparation and Analysis ................................................................................ .. 6 Sediment-Hosted Deposits ................................................................................................... 8 Northumberland Mine .................................................................................................. 8 Wall Canyon Mine ....................................................................................................... 9 Green Monster Canyon Area ........................................................................................ 9 Titus Prospect .............................................................................................................. .. 9 Grantsville Ridge Area ................................................................................................. 9 Teton Prospect ............................................................................................................. .. 10 Fandango Area .............................................................................................................. 10 White Caps Mine .......................................................................................................... 10 Deposits Associated with Volcanic Rocks .......................................................................... .. 11 Volcanic-Associated Deposits Having Low Base-Metal Content.. ............................. .. 11 Round Mountain District ...................................................................................... 11 Divide District ...................................................................................................... 14 Manhattan District ................................................................................................ 15 San Antone District .............................................................................................. 15 Hannapah District ................................................................................................. 16 Longstreet Area .................................................................................................... 16 Bellehelen and Clifford Areas .............................................................................. 16 Gilbert District. ..................................................................................................... 16 Black Rock Prospect. ............................................................................................ 17 Athens District. ..................................................................................................... 17 OMCOMine ......................................................................................................... 17 Goldyke District ................................................................................................... 17 Return Mine .......................................................................................................... 18 Paradise Peak Mine .............................................................................................. 18 Other Prospects .................................................................................................... .. 19 Volcanic-Associated Deposits Having High Base-Metal Content.. ............................ .. 19 Tonopah District ................................................................................................... 19 Reveille District. ................................................................................................... 20 Morey District ...................................................................................................... 20 Tybo District. ........................................................................................................ 20 Ellendale District .................................................................................................. 21 Danville District ................................................................................................... 21 Simon Mine .......................................................................................................... 22 Deposits Associated with Plutonic Rocks ........................................................................... .. 22 Polymetallic Vein and Replacement Deposits ............................................................. 23 Belmont District ................................................................................................... 23 Grantsville District ............................................................................................... 24 Marble Falls Area ................................................................................................. 24 Murphy (Ophir) Mine ........................................................................................... 24 Rays District ......................................................................................................... 25 Skarn Deposits .............................................................................................................. 25 Barcelona District ................................................................................................. 25 Carrie Mine ........................................................................................................... 25 III IV CONTENTS Gunmetal Mine . .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 26 Sullivan Mine........................................................................................................ 26 Scheebar Mine . .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 26 Deposits in Metamorphic Rocks . .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 26 Fluid-Inclusion Studies......................................................................................................... 28 Discussion . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 30 Effective Sampling and Analytical Techniques............................................................ 30 Element Suites and Associations .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 31 Compositional Differences Between Deposit Types .......... .. ... ....... ... ......... .... ....... ..... .. 33 Spatial Differences in Deposit Compositions............................................................... 36 Mineralogical Differences............................................................................................. 36 Applications to Drainage Geochemistry....................................................................... 37 Origins of Precious-Metal Suites.................................................................................. 38 Sources.................................................................................................................. 38 Transport............................................................................................................... 38 Magmatic Gases.................................................................................................... 39 Depth..................................................................................................................... 39 Deposition............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Paleozoic Rocks Antelope Valley Eureka and Nye Counties Nevada
    :It k 'I! ' Paleozoic Rocks Antelope Valley Eureka and Nye Counties Nevada GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 423 Paleozoic Rocks of Antelope Valley Eureka and Nye Counties Nevada By CHARLES W. MERRIAM GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 423 P,rinciples of stratigraphy applied in descriptive study of the Central Great Basin Paleozoic column UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1963 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Page Page Silurian system ____________________________________ _ Abstract------------------------------------------- 1 36 Introduction. _____________________________________ _ 2 General features-------------------------------- 36 Geologic setting ______________ ------ ___ --------- 2 Roberts Mountains formation ___________________ _ 37 History of investigation ________________________ _ 5 Lone Mountain dolomite ______ ---_-------------- 39 Purpose and scope _____________ -- ______ ------ --- 6 Devonian system ______________ ---- __ - _- ___ - _------- 41 Acknowledgments ______________________________ _ 6 General features _____________ - ___________ -_----- 41 Geologic structure as related to stratigraphy __________ _ 6 Western Helderberg age limestones of the Monitor Paleontologic studies ______ ..:. _______ ~ ________________ _ 9 · Range ______ - _.- ___ --------------------------- 42 The Paleozoic column at Antelope Valley
    [Show full text]
  • Paleozoic Geology of the Dobbin Summit-Clear Creek Area, Monitor
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF DIANE CAROL WISE for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Geology presented on August 13, 1976 Title: PALEOZOIC GEOLOGY OF THE DOBBIN SUMMIT- CLEAR CREEK AREA, MONITOR RANGE, NYiE COUNTY, NEVADA Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy son Paleozoic limestones, dolomites, quartz arenites, and other clastic rocks were mapped in the vicinity of Dobbin Summit and Clear Creek in the central Monitor Range. Sedimentary rock units present in this area represent the shallow-shelf eastern assemblage and basin and also the basin-slope facies of the traditional limestone- clastic assemblage. The four oldest, Ordovician, units were deposited in shallow shelf environments. The Lower Ordovician Goodwin Formation is composed of about 1200 feet of calcareous shales and thin-bedded limestones. The overlying Antelope Valley Limestone is about 500 feet thick and consists of wackestones, packstones, and rare algal grainstones.The Copenhagen Formation (135 feet thick) is the highest regressive deposit of sandstone, siltstone, and limestone below the transgressive Eureka Quartzite.The Eureka is a quartz arenite 181 feet thick, with an intercalated shallow marine dolomite member. The transition from shallow to deep water conditions can be seen in the change from algal boundstones to laminated lime mud- stones in the Hanson Creek Formation (190 feet thick).The super- jacent Roberts Mountains Formation (285 feet thick) is composed of lime mudstones and allodapic beds deposited in basinal, deep water conditions.During earliest Devonian
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    FINAL REPORT Decision-support tools for conserving Greater Sage-Grouse during fire and fuels management projects in pinyon and juniper woodlands JFSP 09-1-08-4 Erica Fleishman, University of California, Davis (principal investigator) Jeanne C. Chambers, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Reno, Nevada (co-principal investigator) David S. Dobkin, High Desert Ecological Research Institute, Bend, Oregon (co-principal investigator) Brett G. Dickson, Conservation Science Partners, Truckee, California (co-principal investigator) ABSTRACT Prescribed fire and other fuels management treatments have been suggested as mechanisms to slow expansion of pinyon and juniper woodlands while minimizing potential expansion of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) and increasing habitat quality and quantity for Greater Sage- Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). These treatments also may reduce the probability of severe wildfires, which can have undesirable effects on social, economic, cultural, and ecological values. However, achieving long-term goals related to fire and fuels may conflict with short-term goals related to survival and viability of native species. Fire can fragment high-quality habitat for species associated with woodlands, including more than 20 native species of breeding birds. Additionally, expansion of pinyon and juniper woodlands may have been patchy but common and natural before European settlement of the Great Basin. Evaluation of spatial and temporal trade-offs of actions to reduce probability of wildfire, maintain sagebrush steppe, and conserve native species, including rare or endangered species, can identify strategies that are either consistent or incompatible with achieving these and other objectives simultaneously. We monitored use by Greater Sage-Grouse of areas treated with fire or proposed for treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the Tonopah Area and Adjacent Region of Central Nevada, 1827-1941
    A History of the Tonopah Area and Adjacent Region of Central Nevada, 1827-1941 A History of the Tonopah Area and Adjacent Region of Central Nevada, 1827-1941 A thesis presented to the Faculty of the Department of History UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS by Lucile Rae Berg MAY 1942 with an introduction by Robert D. McCracken Nye County Press TONOPAH, NEVADA Published in 2011 by Nye County Press P.O. Box 153 Tonopah, Nevada 89049 Copyright © 2011 by Nye County Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. ISBN 978-1-878138-04-0 DESIGN BY JANE RAESE Text set in ii-point Adobe Caslon Pro Frontispiece: Lucile Berg in her twenties, circa 1937. Courtesy Lucile R. Berg. Printed in the United States of America Contents Editor's Introduction Acknowledgments Map of South Central Nevada 1 General Description of Big Smoky, Reese River, Monitor, and Ralston Valleys Special Points of Interest Hot Springs Blue Spring Elephant Rock Diana's Bowl or Devil's Punch Bowl Northumberland Caves 2 Early Expeditions Through the Region Fremont's Third Expedition, 1845 Jedediah Smith, 1827 Captain J. H. Simpson, 1859 3 Early Mining Camps in the Region, 1860-1880: Northern Section Ione Ophir Canyon Last Chance, Hercules, and Summit Canyons Kingston Canyon Santé Fe Northumberland 4
    [Show full text]
  • Decision-Support Tools for Conserving Greater Sage-Grouse During Fire and Fuels Management Projects in Pinyon and Juniper Woodla
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln JFSP Research Project Reports U.S. Joint Fire Science Program 2013 Decision-support tools for conserving Greater Sage-Grouse during fire and fuels management projects in pinyon and juniper woodlands Erica Fleishman University of California - Davis Jeanne C. Chambers USDA Forest Service, [email protected] David S. Dobkin High Desert Ecological Research Institute Brett .G Dickson Conservation Science Partners Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/jfspresearch Part of the Forest Biology Commons, Forest Management Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Other Environmental Sciences Commons, Other Forestry and Forest Sciences Commons, Sustainability Commons, and the Wood Science and Pulp, Paper Technology Commons Fleishman, Erica; Chambers, Jeanne C.; Dobkin, David S.; and Dickson, Brett .,G "Decision-support tools for conserving Greater Sage-Grouse during fire and fuels management projects in pinyon and juniper woodlands" (2013). JFSP Research Project Reports. 46. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/jfspresearch/46 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Joint Fire Science Program at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in JFSP Research Project Reports by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. FINAL REPORT Decision-support tools for conserving Greater Sage-Grouse during fire and fuels management projects in pinyon and juniper woodlands JFSP 09-1-08-4 Erica Fleishman, University of California, Davis (principal investigator) Jeanne C. Chambers, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Reno, Nevada (co-principal investigator) David S.
    [Show full text]
  • STRATIGRAPHY and STRUCTURE of the SOUTHERN SULPHUR SPRING RANGE, EUREKA COUNTY, NEVADA Redacted for Privacy Abstract Approved: U G
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESES OF Joseph T. Lipka IC for the degree ofMaster of Sciencein Geology presented on April 17, 1987 Title:STRATIGRAPHY AND STRUCTURE OF THE SOUTHERN SULPHUR SPRING RANGE, EUREKA COUNTY, NEVADA Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: U G. Johnson Early Paleozoic limestones and dolomites of the shallow shelf transitional facies belt were mapped in the southern Sulphur Spring Range, Eureka County, Nevada.The four youngest units in the map area are in fault contact with the Lower Devonian rocks and wereprobably transported westward, along a low-angle normal fault. The minoirlal dolomites of the Hanson Creek Formation, dated as latest Ordovician in the map area, were deposited in a low-energy lagoon.Overlying the Hanson Creek Formation, with a gradational contact, is the lower member ofthe Lone Mountain Dolomite, a probable reef complex.The exposed thickness of the lower Lone Mountain Dolomite is estimated to be 250 feet.The Lower Devonian Old Whalen Member of the Lone Mountain Dolomite is composed of well-bedded, alternating brown and gray dolomites.The repetition of rock types in the Old Whalen Member indicates recurring shallow marine environments on a broad carbonate platform.The Old Whalen is estimated to be 1400 feet thick.Directly overlying the Old Whalen Member, is the Kobeh Member of the Mc Colley Canyon Formation.Rocks of the Mc Colley Canyon Formation were deposited on a shallow shelf under normal marine conditions.The mid-Lower Devonian Kobeh Member is sparsely to abundantly fosciliferous and varies from a peloidal wackestone to a peloidal sandy wackestone to a sandy peloidal packstone.The thickness is 276 feet.Overlying the Kobeh Member are the abundantly fossiliferous beds of the lower part of the Bartine.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Southern Reveille Range, Nye County, Nevada
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 5-2008 Geology of the southern Reveille Range, Nye County, Nevada Matthew Alan McKelvey University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Geology Commons, Stratigraphy Commons, and the Volcanology Commons Repository Citation McKelvey, Matthew Alan, "Geology of the southern Reveille Range, Nye County, Nevada" (2008). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 1447. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/3434676 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GEOLOGY OF THE SOUTHERN REVEILLE RANGE, NYE COUNTY, NEVADA by Matthew Alan McKelvey Bachelor of Science Austin Peay State University 2001 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master Degree of Science in Geoscience Department of Geoscience
    [Show full text]
  • Report 2013–5206
    Geochronology and Correlation of Tertiary Volcanic and Intrusive Rocks in Part of the Southern Toquima Range, Nye County, Nevada Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5206 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geochronology and Correlation of Tertiary Volcanic and Intrusive Rocks in Part of the Southern Toquima Range, Nye County, Nevada By Daniel R. Shawe, Lawrence W. Snee, Frank M. Byers, Jr., and Edward A. du Bray Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5206 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2014 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Shawe, D.R., Snee, L.W., Byers, F.M., Jr., and du Bray, E.A., 2014, Geochronology and correlation of Tertiary volcanic and intrusive rocks in part of the southern Toquima Range, Nye County, Nevada: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bates Mountain Tuff *' in Northern Nye County, Nevada
    1.7* The Bates Mountain Tuff *' in Northern Nye County, Nevada By K. A. SARGENT and E. H. McKEE CONTRIBUTIONS TO STRATIGRAPHY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1294-E UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1969 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 10 cents CONTENTS Page Abstract_______________ El Introduction___________ 1 Lithology and petrography_ 3 Distribution and thickness. 4 Remanent magnetism___. 5 5 References cited. 12 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Generalized map showing known distribution, areas of outcrop, and lines of sections of the Bates Mountain Tuff________ E2 2. Columnar sections from Clipper Canyon section in northern Toquima Range to Crested Wheat section hi Hot Creek Range_ _____________________________ ____ 3. Columnar sections from Butler Creek in central Monitor Range to Antelope Spring in southern Monitor Range_______ - . 4. Approximate distribution of units 1-5 of the Bates Mountain Tuff in northern Nye County, Nev_________--___ _____ 10 TABLES Page TABLE 1. Analysis of black vitrophyre at base of densely welded part of unit 2, Bates Mountain Tuff, Clipper Canyon, Lander County, Nev______________________________________________ E3 2. Average phenocryst values of five cooling units of the Bates Mountain Tuff at Clipper Canyon, northern Toquima Range. 3. Phenocryst mineralogy of Bates Mountain Tuff and older tuffs at section localities shown in figure 2_________________ 4. Phenocryst mineralogy of Bates Mountain Tuff, younger tuffs, and certain older tuffs at section localities shown in figure 3__ 5. Remanent-magnetism directions in samples collected from unit 5 of the Bates Mountain Tuff-.----------.-.______ 11 6.
    [Show full text]
  • HUMBOLDT-TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST 2019 Year in Review
    HUMBOLDT-TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST 2019 Year In Review United States Forest Department of Service Agriculture USDA is an Equal Opportunity Employer & Provider. Forest Supervisor’s Message MESSAGE he Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest had another successful year in T 2019. As I reflect on the past year’s accomplishments, I cannot help but think of the USDA Forest Service’s mission statement: “To sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the Nation’s forests and grass- lands to meet the needs of present and future generations.” Every initiative we undertake tiers to this mission and it is the backbone of our Forest’s strategic plan and our daily work. You will see that in the last year we accomplished a number of key initia- tives and projects with the States of Nevada and California, Tribes, local communities, and collaborative groups. Especially significant in 2019, a Shared Stewardship Agreement was signed by the Nevada Governor, Intermountain and Pacific Southwest Regional Foresters, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Nevada State Director, and Pacific Southwest Region- al U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Director. Nevada becomes the ninth state in the nation to sign such an agreement, 2019 LEADERSHIP HIGHLIGHTS but it is the only state so far to also include the BLM and USFWS in the agreement. We encouraged this given the ownership boundaries of fed- • Completed 24,069 acres of hazardous fuels treatments helping the Forest become more eral lands in the state. fire-resilient and healthy. While “shared stewardship” or working across jurisdictions and taking an • Hired a Tribal Relations Specialist to continue “all lands” approach is not new for the employees on the Humboldt-Toi- to build stronger relationships and work col- laboratively with local tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Historical Society Quarterly
    NEVADA HISTORICAL SOCIETY QUARTERLY Volume XXV Spring 1982 Number 1 NEVADA HISTORICAL SOCIETY QUARTERLY Gary K. Roberts, Editor EDITORIAL BOARD - Mary Ellen Glass, Chairman Oral History PrO/ect, Dniversity of Nevada, Reno Jerome E. Edwards, Secretary U niversUy of Nevada, Reno Sheilagh Brooks University of Nevada, Las Vegas Robert Davenport University of Nevada, Las Vegas Donald Hardesty University of Nevada, Reno James Hulse of Nevada, Reno Eugene Moehring University of Nevada, Las Vegas Mary Rusco Nevada State Museum University of Nevada, Reno The QU4rterlr/ solicits contributions of scholarly or popular interest -dealing with the following subjects: the general (e.g., the political, social, economic, constitutional) or the natural history of Nevada and the Great Basin; the literature, languages, anthropology, and archaeology of these areas; reprints of historic documents (concerning people, flora, fauna, historical or archaeological sites); reviews and essays concerning the historical literature of Nevada, the Great Basin, and the West. Prospective authors should send their work to The Editor, -Nevada HisWrical Societll Quarterly, 1555 E. Flamingo, #238, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89109. Papers should -be typed double- spaced-and sent in duplicate. All manuscripts, whether articles, edited documents, or essays, should. conform with the most recent edition of the University of Chicago Press Manual of Stille. Footnotes should be typed double-spaced on separate pages and numbered consecutively. Cor- respondence concerning articles and essays is welcomed, and should be addressed to The Editor. © Copyright Nevada Historical Society, 1981. The Net'ada Historical Society Quarterly (ISSN 0047-9462) is published quarterly by the Nevada Historical Society at 1555 E. Flamingo, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109.
    [Show full text]
  • June 29, 195? Approved by Director,Of Thesis
    GEOLOGY OF THE COPENHAGEN CANYON AREA, MONITOR RANGE, EUREKA COUNTY, NEVADA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE By Louis C. Bortz Reno, Nevada June 29, 195? Approved by Director,of Thesis Approved by Major Professor Approved by __ (J ,V \ irman of Graduate Committee i CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction................ Location and Accessibility Geography .............. Physical Features .... Scope of Investigation. Method of Investigation . Previous Investigations . Acknowledgements........ Stratigraphy........................ 6 Introduction.................... 6 Ordovician System............... 7 Eastern Assemblage.......... 7 Pogonip Group .......... 7 Ninemile Formation. 8 Antelope Valley Limestone 9 Copenhagen Formation. 12 Eureka Quartzite........ 16 Hanson Creek Formation. 18 Western Assemblage.......... 20 Vinini Formation........ 20 Silurian System ................ 23 Roberts Mountains Formation . 23 Devonian System ................ 26 "Nevada" Formation.......... 27 Pennsylvanian System............ 29 Quaternary Alluvium ............ 30 30 Igneous Rocks ............ Albite Microsyenite Dike 30 Tertiary Volcanics. 31 32 Structures............................... 32 Folds ............................... 34 Normal Faults ...................... 36 Thrust Faults ...................... Deformation of the "Nevada" Formation 40 42 Geologic History. 45 Summary 46 Appendix. 55 References Cited. ii ILLUSTRATIONS Page PLATE I - Geologic
    [Show full text]