NO CHOICE, NO EXIT the Left’S Plans for Your Health Care

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NO CHOICE, NO EXIT the Left’S Plans for Your Health Care NO CHOICE, NO EXIT The Left’s Plans for Your Health Care edited by MARIE FISHPAW and ROBERT E. MOFFIT, PHD More praise for NO CHOICE, NO EXIT The Left’s Plans for Your Health Care Big government is especially pernicious when asserting control over an individual‘s health care. A bill which received an all-day hearing in a House of Representatives committee would do just that, resulting in a complete government takeover of health care. This book provides a go-to source as we continue the difficult debates about the federal presence in health care. —REP. MICHAEL C. BURGESS (R-TX-26), MD No Choice, No Exit: The Left’s Plans for Your Health Care cuts through the rhetoric to explain the consequences of proposals purporting to save a family money by raising their taxes and limiting their health care choices. The publication is timely as health care will be part of the debate for the presidential campaign and into the next Congress. Americans who wish to understand this debate should read this book. —SEN. BILL CASSIDY (R-LA), MD Health reform remains a top priority for Americans. They’re concerned about high costs, access, and choice. This book explicitly shows how the Left’s plan for your health care fails to address those concerns. —JOHN GOODMAN, PHD, FATHER OF HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS AND CO-AUTHOR OF BEST-SELLING BOOK PATIENT POWER This important collection cuts through the Left’s rhetoric on health care to highlight the danger of over-centralization and government control. American health care faces real problems, but the Left would only double down on them. —YUVAL LEVIN, PHD, DIRECTOR, SOCIAL, CULTURAL, AND CONSTITUTIONAL STUDIES AT AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE AND EDITOR IN CHIEF, NATIONAL AFFAIRS It has never been more important than now to understand what a single-payer system would mean. This is a “must read.” —GAIL WILENSKY, PHD, ECONOMIST AND SENIOR FELLOW, PROJECT HOPE NO CHOICE, NO EXIT The Left’s Plans for Your Health Care edited by MARIE FISHPAW and ROBERT E. MOFFIT, PHD © 2020 by The Heritage Foundation 214 Massachusetts Ave., NE Washington, DC 20002 (202) 546-4400 | heritage.org All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. ISBN: 978-0-89195-173-5 CONTENTS FOREWORD From the President of The Heritage Foundation .................................. vii KAY C. JAMES INTRODUCTION Government-Controlled Health Care: Rhetoric Versus Reality ..................... 1 MARIE FISHPAW and MERIDIAN PAULTON SECTION 1: Public Option: The Trojan Horse to Government-Controlled Health Care Introduction ........................................................ 13 CHAPTER 1 The “Public Option”: Government-Run Health Care on the Installment Plan ............................................. 15 NINA OWCHARENKO SCHAEFER and ROBERT E. MOFFIT, PHD CHAPTER 2 The Public Option: Single Payer on the Installment Plan ............ 19 NINA OWCHARENKO SCHAEFER and ROBERT E. MOFFIT, PHD SECTION 2: Leading House and Senate Bills Introduction ........................................................ 41 CHAPTER 3 House Democrats Unveil Plan to Bring Total Government Control Over American Health Care ........................................ 43 ROBERT E. MOFFIT, PHD CHAPTER 4 Total Control: The House Democrats’ Single-Payer Health Care Prescription ........................................... 47 ROBERT E. MOFFIT, PHD CHAPTER 5 Government Monopoly: Senator Sanders’ “Single-Payer” Health Care Prescription ........................................... 71 ROBERT E. MOFFIT, PHD CHAPTER 6 Sacrificing Public and Private Health Insurance for “Medicare for All” ............................................... 97 DOUGLAS HOLTZ-EAKIN, PHD, and ROBERT E. MOFFIT, PHD CHAPTER 7 New “Medicare for All” Bill Would Kick 181 Million Off Private Insurance .............................................. 101 ROBERT E. MOFFIT, PHD SECTION 3: Framing the National Debate Introduction ....................................................... 107 CHAPTER 8 The National Debate over Government-Controlled Health Care ....109 ROBERT E. MOFFIT, PHD, CHRISTOPHER POPE, PHD, and WHIT AYRES, PHD CHAPTER 9 No Choice, No Exit: The Truth About “Medicare for All” Proposals .......................................131 ROBERT E. MOFFIT, PHD SECTION 4: Britain and Canada: Lessons from Their Experiences Introduction ....................................................... 137 CHAPTER 10 London Calling: Don’t Commit to Nationalized Health Care .......139 TIM EVANS, PHD CHAPTER 11 How Socialized Medicine Hurts Canadians and Leaves Them Worse Off Financially ...........................153 PETER ST. ONGE, PHD CHAPTER 12 Lessons from the Canadian Health Care System ................... 167 BACCHUS BARUA and STEVEN GLOBERMAN, PHD CHAPTER 13 What Bernie Sanders Isn’t Telling You About Canadian Health Care ......................................185 PETER ST. ONGE, PHD CHAPTER 14 Why “Medicare for All” Isn’t the Right Prescription for a Pandemic ....................................................189 ROBERT E. MOFFIT, PHD SECTION 5: Are You Better Off Financially Under Government-Controlled Health Care? Introduction .......................................................195 CHAPTER 15 In Charts, How Medicare for All Would Make Most Families Poorer .............................................. 197 MARIE FISHPAW and JAMIE BRYAN HALL CHAPTER 16 How “Medicare for All” Harms Working Americans ................205 EDMUND F. HAISLMAIER and JAMIE BRYAN HALL SECTION 6: Government-Controlled Health Care and the Impact on the Medical Profession Introduction .......................................................219 CHAPTER 17 Hello, “Medicare for All.” Goodbye, Doctor–Patient Relationship. ......................................221 ROBERT E. MOFFIT, PHD CHAPTER 18 “Medicare for All” Will Further Lower Physician Morale.............225 KEVIN PHAM, MD CHAPTER 19 U.S. Must Avoid a Single-Payer Health Care System That Stresses Doctors to the Breaking Point .......................229 KEVIN PHAM, MD, and ROBERT E. MOFFIT, PHD CHAPTER 20 How “Medicare for All” Bills Would Worsen the Doctor Shortage ..............................................233 ROBERT E. MOFFIT, PHD CHAPTER 21 Medicare Is No Model of Administrative Simplicity or Efficiency ... 237 ROBERT E. MOFFIT, PHD CHAPTER 22 How “Medicare for All” Could Block Medical Progress ............. 241 KEVIN PHAM, MD CHAPTER 23 What the Left Gets Wrong About Health Spending and Outcomes ....................................................245 ROBERT E. MOFFIT, PHD SECTION 7: False Hope: Government-Controlled Health Care Will Not Improve Lives Introduction ....................................................... 251 CHAPTER 24 Government-Controlled Health Care Won’t Help Us Live Longer ........................................253 ROBERT E. MOFFIT, PHD CHAPTER 25 Ignore Medicare for All Advocates’ Claims on Life Expectancy in the U.S.—Here Are the Facts .................................... 257 ROBERT E. MOFFIT, PHD CHAPTER 26 Health Care: The Greatest Pro-Life Political Battle of Our Time .... 261 LOUIS BROWN CONCLUSION The Truth About Government-Controlled Health Care ........................... 267 BY ROBERT E. MOFFIT, PHD APPENDICES ......................................................................283 ADDITIONAL RESOURCES ...........................................................309 ENDNOTES ........................................................................ 311 FOREWORD From the President of The Heritage Foundation KAY C. JAMES igh-quality medical care is more than just having good insurance Hcoverage. It is also about having the right medical professional who can accurately diagnose your issue, it is about getting timely access to the medical treatment or procedure you need, and it’s about having a trusted relationship with your physician where you have confidence in the help and advice she is giving you. Unfortunately, too many politicians want to insert government even further into these very personal aspects of our health care. They might dress up more government intrusion with nice-sounding terms like “free health care,” “public option,” “Medicare for All,” or “moderate” alterna- tives. But do not be fooled. When the federal government gets more say in your health care decision-making than you do, you end up paying the price—both financially and with your health care options. Even the so-called public-option plans—where the government becomes an insurer that competes with private insurance companies—are a path to “single payer” government-controlled care. Because the gov- ernment can use its regulatory power to set its prices below those of its private-market competitors, private insurers would disappear and the government plan would become the only available coverage. This book details the truly devastating impact that single-payer pro- posals would have on Americans. As seen in so many other countries, government-run health care would mean long wait times to see doctors and for surgeries. It would also mean reduced access to advanced life-saving The Heritage Foundation | heritage.org vii technologies and pharmaceuticals. Furthermore, the leading single-payer proposals in Congress would require massive tax increases that would result in most Americans paying more for health care than they do today. That is right. Ultimately, under these “free” or “virtually free” single- payer proposals, nearly two-thirds of American households would end up paying more. Yet, few politicians who support such proposals will ever admit that. When the government controls the
Recommended publications
  • COVID-19. Rarely Does the World Offer Proof of an Academic Argument, and Even More Rarely in a Single Word Or Term
    PREFACE TO THE PAPERBACK uU COVID-19. Rarely does the world offer proof of an academic argument, and even more rarely in a single word or term. But there it is. COVID-19 has shown us in the starkest terms—life and death—what happens when we don’t trust science and defy the advice of experts. As of this writing, the United States leads the world in both total cases and total deaths from COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus that appeared in 2019. One might think that death rates would be highest in China, where the virus first emerged and doctorswere presumably caught unpre- pared, but that is not the case. According to The Lancet— the world’s premier medical journal—as of early October 2020, China had confirmed 90,604 cases of COVID-19 and 4,739 deaths, while the United States had registered 7,382,194 cases and 209,382 deaths.1 And China has a population more than four times that of the United States. If the United States had a pandemic pattern similar to China, we would have seen only 22,500 cases and 1128 deaths. While COVID-19 has killed people across the globe, death rates have been far higher in the United States than in other wealthy countries, such as Germany, Iceland, South Korea, New Zealand, and Taiwan, and even than in some much poorer x • Preface to the Paperback countries, such as Vietnam.2 The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine puts the US death rate per 100,000 people at 65.5.3 In Germany it is 11.6.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Center of Excellence for Healthcare
    Global Center of Excellence for Healthcare kpmg.com/healthcare KPMG INTERNATIONAL Global Center of Excellence for Healthcare Supporting clients with the very best minds from around the world. Health systems around the world are facing unprecedented The KPMG Global Center of Excellence for Healthcare challenges that require policy makers, payers, providers, contains some of the world’s leading healthcare professionals. and suppliers to rethink how they work. However, while the Individuals in this team have been at the heart of health reform problems are well known the solutions are taking time to and practice for many decades. Most have held senior positions materialize – and time is running out. New approaches to in the private and public sector and are prominent members of providing and paying for healthcare must emerge in the next highly influential think tanks and associations. Based in North few years. The organizations that succeed will be those that America, Europe and Asia/Pacific, the team is mobile and works are able to adapt, experiment, innovate and take risks. alongside our network of 156 member firms to design and implement creative and practical solutions for our clients that In these unprecedented times, healthcare leaders require harness the latest in national, regional and global perspectives. insight and guidance from audit, tax and advisory professionals We are proud to introduce our team in this document. they can trust. That is why leading organizations turn to KPMG’s global health practice. Our propositions revolve around five For additional information or to speak with one of our Center core themes: of Excellence team members, contact your local engagement • Working across regional health ecosystems to redesign partner or email [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Eka-Weekly-Covid-Update-12
    Weekly COVID-19 Update From EKA December 2, 2020 Coronavirus Deaths Soar The US has reported more than 13.5 million cases and 268,000 deaths. Globally, there have been 63 million cases and 1.47 million fatalities. In November alone, one of every 76 Americans tested positive for COVID-19, and the country reported 36,918 deaths – a toll greater than American losses in the Korean War. The Safer at Home order has been in place in Los Angeles since March 19. Previous EKA COVID-19 updates Our previous COVID-19 updates can be found here. Feel free to share our updates with friends and colleagues. We hope you find the information in the EKA updates and the questions they raise to be informative. If you have any COVID-19 government or communications questions, please reach out to any EKA team members. Confirmed Or Suspected Cases Of COVID-19 At Work – What Do You Need To Do The Health Department has created a document that updates the close contact definition and requirements around who must quarantine and isolate. Also provided is additional updated information on the management of symptomatic staff or visitors. Click here to view FAQs for Managers Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) from the Los Angeles County Department of Public. Click here to view Protocols for Office Worksites. Click here to view some of the protections that employers are required to put in place. Click here to view the office worksite toolkit. OPENING/ CLOSING & RESTRICTIONS New LA County Order The Los Angeles County Health Officer Safer at Home Health Officer Order took effect on Monday and ends on December 20, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Unison.Org.Uk
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Greenwich Academic Literature Archive Unhealthy development The UK Department for International Development and the promotion of healthcare privatisation Written by Jane Lethbridge Public Services International Research Unit June 2016 This report was written by Dr Jane Lethbridge, Director of the Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU). PSIRU investigates the impact of privatisation and liberalisation on public services, with a specific focus on water, energy, waste management, health and social care sectors. Other research topics include the function and structure of public services, the strategies of multinational companies and influence of international finance institutions on public services. PSIRU is based in the Business Faculty, University of Greenwich, London, UK. Researchers: Prof. Steve Thomas, Dr. Jane Lethbridge (Director), Dr. Emanuele Lobina, Prof. David Hall, Dr. Jeff Powell, Dr. Mary Robertson, Sandra Van Niekerk, Dr. Yuliya Yurchenko www.psiru.org This report was commissioned by UNISON as research into the UK government‟s promotion and funding of private healthcare provision in the Global South. The aim of the research was to highlight the damaging impact that the promotion of private healthcare has on public healthcare provision, communities and workers and the benefits it provides to multi-national healthcare companies. The report addresses this brief by examining the following: DFID and the UK government‟s promotion of and financial support for private healthcare since 2010; Public-private healthcare partnerships; How the promotion of private healthcare is not informed by evidence of effectiveness; Influence of healthcare companies driving the agenda; Three case studies: Kenya, Liberia and Nepal.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2005/6 This Annual Report Covers the Period 1 April 2005 to 31 March 2006
    Annual Report and Accounts 2005/6 This annual report covers the period 1 April 2005 to 31 March 2006 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Schedule 1, paragraph 25(4) of the Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Act 2003 Contents 1. Chairman’s Statement …………………………………………. 3 2. Chief Executive’s Statement …………………………………..... 5 3. Background information………………………………………….. 6 3.1 University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust ... 6 3.2 Birmingham New Hospitals Project (BNHP) ……………... 6 3.3 Other background …………………………………………… 7 4. Operating and Financial Review ………………………………... 8 4.1 Operational Reporting ……………………………………… 8 4.2 Patient Care …………………..…………………………….. 21 4.3 Stakeholders ………………………………………………… 24 4.4 Finance and Performance …………………………………. 27 4.5 Going Concern ……………………………………………… 31 5. Board of Governors ……………………………………………….. 32 5.1 Structure of the Board of Governors ……………………… 32 6. Board of Directors ………………………………………………… 35 6.1 The composition of the Board of Directors ……………….. 35 6.2 Performance appraisal ……………………………………… 39 6.3 Board of Directors’ interests …….………………………... 39 7. Membership ………………………………………………………… 40 7.1 Membership Overview by Constituency ………………….. 40 7.2 Membership development …………………………………. 41 7.3 Membership strategy ……………………………………….. 41 7.4 Foundation Members monthly health seminars ………… 42 7.5 Readership Panels …………………………………………. 42 7.6 Consultation …………………………………………………. 42 7.7 Website ………………………………………………………. 42 7.8 Trust in the Future …………………………………………... 43 7.9 Governors’ Development …………………………………… 43 8. Public Interest disclosures ………………………………………. 44 8.1 Disability policies ……………………………………………. 44 8.2 Equal opportunities …………………………………………. 44 8.3 Provision of information and consultation with employees/ stakeholders ………………………… …. 44 8.4 Health and safety performance ………………………… …. 45 8.5 Occupational health development ………………………… 45 8.6 Countering fraud and corruption ………………………….. 45 8.7 Better Payment practice code ……………………………... 46 8.8 The late payment of commercial debts ………………….
    [Show full text]
  • When Physicians Engage in Practices That Threaten the Nation's Health
    Opinion When Physicians Engage in Practices VIEWPOINT That Threaten the Nation’s Health Philip A. Pizzo, MD In December 2020, less than a year after severe acute young people are not harmed by the virus and cannot Departments of respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was identified as spread the disease; reportedly pressured the Centers for Pediatrics and the cause of the coronavirus pandemic, an extraordi- Disease Control and Prevention to issue guidance (later Microbiology and nary collaboration between scientists, the pharmaceuti- reversed)statingthatasymptomaticindividualsneednot Immunology, Stanford 4 University School of cal industry, and government led to 2 highly efficacious, be tested ; and made unsupported claims about the im- Medicine, Stanford, safe vaccines being approved by the US Food and Drug munity conferred by surviving infection. Nearly all pub- California. Administration to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 lic health experts were concerned that his recommen- (COVID-19) infection.1,2 Had the US been in its expected dations could lead to tens of thousands (or more) of David Spiegel, MD role as a global leader in medicine and public health, this unnecessary deaths in the US alone. Department of Psychiatry and would have been a fitting capstone of US commitment to History is a potent reminder of tragic circum- Behavioral Sciences, science and how that can change the course of morbid- stances when physicians damaged the public health, Stanford University ity and mortality related to a frightening new disease. from promoting eugenics to participating in the human School of Medicine, Stanford, California. However, a less flattering story emerged about the experiments that took place in Tuskegee to asserting er- inadequate US response to COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Polarization and the Dissemination of Misinformation: the United States Pandemic Response As a Cautionary Tale
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Honors College Spring 5-2021 Political Polarization and the Dissemination of Misinformation: the United States Pandemic Response as a Cautionary Tale Mary Giglio Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors Part of the American Politics Commons This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLITICAL POLARIZATION AND THE DISSEMINATION OF MISINFORMATION: THE UNITED STATES PANDEMIC RESPONSE AS A CAUTIONARY TALE by Mary K. Giglio A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for a Dual-Degree with Honors (International Affairs and Political Science) The Honors College The University of Maine May 2021 Advisory Committee: Richard Powell, Professor of Political Science, Advisor Mark Brewer, Professor of Political Science, Honors College Lora Pitman, Adjunct Assistant Professor of Political Science Asif Nawaz, Assistant Professor of History and International Affairs Zachary Rockwell Ludington, Assistant Professor of Spanish i ABSTRACT This thesis discusses the failings of the United States response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and how it has been shaped by the nation’s intense political polarization and the widespread dissemination of misinformation. In this thesis, I critically examine the government’s initial response to the pandemic, including its lack of preparedness and the ineffectiveness of its eventual policies. I also attempt to explain the influence of political polarization on the states, resulting in congressional gridlock, as well as wildly varying policies regarding lockdowns and mask mandates.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Hospital Research & Education Foundation Emergency
    Kentucky Hospital Research & Education Foundation Emergency Preparedness Update for September 3, 2020 National Preparedness Month (ASPR) National Preparedness Month (NPM) is recognized each September to promote family and community disaster planning now and throughout the year. As our nation continues to respond to COVID-19, there is no better time to be involved this September. The 2020 NPM theme is "Disasters Don't Wait. Make Your Plan Today." Ready.gov has built a NPM toolkit for stakeholders to distribute through their communication channels. The toolkit includes weekly themes, social media and graphics, videos, and other resources. This week, we remind individuals to create a family disaster kit. A disaster supplies kit is a collection of basic items your household may need in an emergency. Make sure your kit is stocked with the items from this FEMA checklist. This year, addition emergency supplies are needed in your kit to help prevent the spread of coronavirus. Be sure you kit includes these CDC-recommended supplies: Two cloth face coverings for everyone age 2 and older Hand sanitizer with at least 60% alcohol, and bar or liquid soap Disinfecting wipes to disinfect surfaces ---------- KY COVID-19 - Daily Summary New cases today: 906; Total 509,885 New deaths today: 10; Total 976 Total PCR Tests: 839,705; Positivity Rate: 4.53% See Governor’s Press Releases: https://governor.ky.gov/news ---------- Four Midwestern states are seeing worrying COVID-19 spikes Most of the Midwest had been spared the worst of Covid-19 — until now. The coronavirus is always restless, always searching for new people in new places to infect.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Rick Bright, One of the Nation's Leading Experts in Pandemic
    THIRD ADDENDUM TO THE COMPLAINT OF PROHIBITED PERSONNEL PRACTICE AND OTHER PROHIBITED ACTIVITY BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES SUBMITTED BY DR. RICK BRIGHT I. Introduction Dr. Rick Bright, one of the nation’s leading experts in pandemic preparedness and response, and an internationally recognized expert in the fields of immunology, therapeutic intervention, and vaccine and diagnostic development, was abruptly removed from his position as Director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (“BARDA”) and transferred to a limited position at the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) in retaliation for his whistleblowing activity under 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8)(A). Specifically, and as detailed in his initial Complaint of Prohibited Personnel Practice filed with the Office of Special Counsel (“OSC”) on May 5, 2020, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Alex Azar, and other HHS political leaders engaged in an overtly hostile and career-derailing campaign of retaliation against Dr. Bright because he raised concerns about the Trump administration’s chaotic and reckless response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Shortly after cases of COVID-19 were identified in the United States, Dr. Bright sounded the alarm about the shortage of critical supplies, such as masks, respirators, swabs, and syringes that were necessary to combat COVID-19. In response, HHS political leadership leveled baseless criticisms against him and sidelined him because of his insistence that the Trump administration address these shortages and invest in vaccine development as well. Dr. Bright continued to speak out about the inevitable devastation that would be wrought by this virus at a time President Trump and his administration were intentionally lying to the American people about the serious threat posed by COVID-19 to the public health and safety.1 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trojan Horse: the Growth of Commercial Sponsorship
    Philips, Deborah, and Garry Whannel. "Safe in Their Hands? Health and the Market." The Trojan Horse: The Growth of Commercial Sponsorship. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013. 185–220. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 28 Sep. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781472545145.ch-008>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 28 September 2021, 22:55 UTC. Copyright © 2013 Deborah Philips and Garry Whannel 2013. You may share this work for non- commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 8 Safe in Their Hands? Health and the Market The public provision of health care constitutes a large percentage of the public spending budget of any major Western country. The establishment of the National Health Service in 1946 was rooted in the core principle of a comprehensive health service free at point of use, a principle that, broadly, still remains intact, despite growing colonization by the private sector. The cost of health provision is inevitably a pressure point in government expenditure, as resources are finite and the needs of health care are extensive. The growth of medical technology, expanded range of drug-based treatment, and rising life expectancy all push costs upwards. The National Health Service still constitutes, compared to other systems in the world, a remarkably efficient means of fulfilling health services delivery, with a high level of quality. In the United States, the enormous sums spent on health by the state and by individuals paying for insurance, combined with the lack of a proper publicly owned health system, has generated a large and profitable private sector.
    [Show full text]
  • A Seat at the Table: the Key Role of Biostatistics and Data Science During the Pandemic
    A Seat at the Table: The Key Role of Biostatistics and Data Science during the Pandemic Jeffrey S. Morris Director, Division of Biostatistics Professor, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics Perelman School of Medicine Professor, Department of Statistics The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania May 27, 2021 Centrality of Statistics in the Pandemic Biomedical Data Science: emerging field including computer science, computational biology, informatics, statistics that together is involved in extracting knowledge from ever more complex and abundant data in biomedical research Statistics plays a central role in data science given expertise • Experimental design and reproducibility of research • Deep understanding of variability, measurement error, missing data, correlated data, and causal inference. • Fundamental understanding of inferential thinking • Quantification of uncertainty • Modeling frameworks for integrative learning across studies 2 Centrality of Statistics in the Pandemic Statistical thinking crucial to evaluate emerging knowledge • Properly interpret various types of data: testing/case/hospitalization/death • Evaluate strength of evidence of emerging insights from papers/preprints • Cut through political and other narratives to identify what the data say • Synthesize information across different types of studies to identify knowledge • Clearly communicate results and their limitations and uncertainties Engagement/Impact on Broader Society: Efforts during Pandemic • Covid-datascience.com blog page • COVID-Lab
    [Show full text]
  • Exoskeletal Assemblages: on the Disembodiments of Being Misread by Patricia J
    Exoskeletal Assemblages: On the Disembodiments of Being Misread By Patricia J. Williams Copyright, 2021 This essay is a draft prepared for the exclusive use of the Law and Gender Colloquium at Northwestern University, April 7, 2021, and is not for wider circulation. It is the first chapter of a book I'm working on, about the disassembling and disembodying effects of new technology. This piece of the project (parts of which will be published in a public health handbook) is mostly about how race and gender history is woven into present assemblages, particularly with regard to the pandemic. Chapter One Micro to Macro We were in first grade together, the woman who used to call me her Best Black Friend. I cured her of that years later, but still, after a lifetime of valiant trying on both our parts, she retains the power to startle. There we were, having a perfectly amiable chat about actor James Earl Jones’s lusciously resonant baritone when she said: “it must be because of the way black people’s larynxes are shaped. You can hear the difference in the how their vocal cords affect sound.” I was so taken aback by her sudden slippage into an imaginary plural that I could not speak. She saw that I was struggling. “It’s probably why you have such a beautiful voice,” she added gently, as though application of the aggregate singular might help.1 I have been thinking a lot about my friend over the course of this last tumultuous pandemic-riled year. We are obviously all derailed by the catastrophe of COVID-19, no matter what our relative privilege or status.
    [Show full text]