CURRENT OPINION Alternatives to Prokinetics to Move the Pylorus and Colon
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
REVIEW CURRENT OPINION Alternatives to prokinetics to move the pylorus and colon Florian Pfaba,b,c,d, Martina Nowak-Machene, Vitaly Napadowb, and Johannes Fleckensteinf Purpose of review Gastrointestinal motility disorders (GMDs) are common in the ICU. When encountering these problems, one typically thinks of prokinetics. This review summarizes current evidence of treatments. Recent findings Prokinetics are not the first-line therapy for GMDs. In fact, the clinical implications of using prokinetic agents are rather controversial. Current evidence on alternative treatment modalities such as fluid and electrolyte management, laxatives, opioid antagonists, purgative enemas, acupuncture, physical therapies and probiotics is growing. Summary Current state of the art to treat GMDs is primarily focused at the elimination of underlying trigger factors. Fluid and electrolyte management as well as laxatives and peripherally acting m-opioid receptor antagonists are the recommended first-line therapies that can be complemented with prokinetics. Acupuncture as well as physical modalities, such as massage or warming of the abdomen, is promising with few side-effects and should be considered as well. Keywords critically ill, motility, m-opioid receptor antagonists, prokinetics, therapies INTRODUCTION constipation and paralytic ileus include the admis- Gastrointestinal motility disorders (GMDs) are com- sion diagnosis (such as head injuries, burns, multi- mon in the ICU, occurring in approximately 50% of system trauma, and sepsis), electrolyte abnormalities, mechanically ventilated critically ill patients [1&]. age, sex, drugs (such as narcotics or catecholamines), The occurence of delayed gastric emptying is recent abdominal surgery, sepsis and shock with particularly increased in patients with head injuries, circulating cytokines [2]. Malnutrition, caused by burns, multisystem trauma, and sepsis [2]. The delayed gastric emptying and gastroesophageal severity of illness, quantified by the Acute Physi- ology and Chronic Health Evaluation Score II score aDepartment of Preventive and Rehabilitative Sports Medicine, Techni- (based on age, physiological variables and chronic b health conditions) also directly correlates with the sche Universita¨tMu¨nchen, Munich, Germany, Department of Radiology, Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hos- incidence of delayed gastric emptying [2]. Several pital, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, USA, cDepartment of mechanisms are involved in the etiology of bowel Dermatology and Allergy, Technische Universita¨t Mu¨nchen, Munich, dysfunction including parenteral nutrition, mech- Germany, dChristine-Ku¨hne Center of Allergy Research and Education e anical ventilation, hypoperfusion, shock, dehy- (CK-CARE), Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women’s dration, secretion of inflammatory mediators as Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA and fDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Munich, Klinikum Grossha- well as endogenous and exogenous opioids [3]. dern, Munich, Germany Motility disorders may involve any part of the Correspondence to Privatdozent Doz. Dr med. Florian Pfab, Department gastrointestinal tract, including the esophagus, of Prevention and Sports Medicine, Technische Universita¨t Mu¨nchen, stomach, small intestine, and colon, and are com- Conollystrasse 32, 80809 Mu¨nchen, Germany. Tel: +49 89 289 24414; monly associated with delayed gastric emptying, e-mail: [email protected] constipation, paralytic ileus and diarrhea. Factors Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2012, 15:166–173 that favor symptoms of delayed gastric emptying, DOI:10.1097/MCO.0b013e32834f3000 www.co-clinicalnutrition.com Volume 15 Number 2 March 2012 Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. Alternatives to prokinetics Pfab et al. the intestinal muscle, which inhibits propulsive gut KEY POINTS motility [12]. More specifically, muscular cramps of Gastrointestinal motility disorders are common in the intestine are either a consequence of a decreased the ICU. release of nitric oxide from inhibitory enteric neurones or a direct activation of intestinal myo- Elimination of factors inhibiting gastrointestinal motility cytes through opioid receptors [13]. In addition, remains the principle therapeutic approach. prolonged intestinal transit, increased muscle tone Fluid and electrolyte management as well as laxatives (also at the anal sphincter) and decreased gut and peripherally acting m-opioid receptor antagonists secretions form the clinical characteristics of are the next therapeutic steps that can be constipation. complemented with prokinetics. Acupuncture as well as physical modalities are promising with few side-effects. DIAGNOSIS The diagnostic possibilities in the ICU setting are limited; the most important evaluations being clinical history and examination. A detailed reflux, is still a cause of increased patient morbidity patient’s history may avoid further diagnostic pro- and mortality in the ICU. cedures. Stool frequencies and appearance are gener- Although less frequent than constipation, diar- ally daily monitored by nurses and doctors. At the rhea is also a common finding in critically ill beginning of symptoms, a rectal palpation is part of patients, regardless of the initial cause of admission the basic examination. A very helpful tool to facili- to the ICU with incidences between 15 and 38% [4&]. tate the diagnosis of functional constipation is the Causes of diarrhea in the critically ill patient include Rome III-criteria [14]. enteral feeding with short-chain carbohydrates [5&], drugs such as magnesium and sorbitol [6], antibiotic therapy [4&], fever or hypothermia [6], malnutrition PROKINETICS [7] and physiological factors associated with stress Prokinetics such as dopamine antagonists [metoclo- [8]. Clostridium difficile colonization remains the pramide (MCP), domperidone], cholecystokinin, most common cause of infectious diarrhea in the serotonin agonists (MCP or erythromycin) are com- critically ill patients, triggering inflammation and monly used in critically ill patients with intestinal potentially followed by detrimental complications dysfunction [15]. The 5HT4 receptor agonist MCP is such as bowel necrosis and colon dilation with the most widely used prokinetic agent in patients perforation. with gastric feeding intolerance and stimulates gas- The underlying pathophysiology for the devel- tric and duodenal motility, predominantly via an opment of impaired gastrointestinal motility is action on efferent myenteric cholinergic neurons complex and multifactorial involving the neuronal, releasing acetylcholine [16&&]. MCP is also a D2- hormonal, endocrine, muscular, inflammatory, and receptor antagonist and therefore contraindicated homeostatic systems, and including effects of in Parkinson’s disease. surgery, immobilization, mechanical ventilation The short-term administration of MCP 10 mg and medication (i.e. opioids) [9]. Particularly given four times a day intravenously may be more opioid-induced effects play a key role in the mech- effective than placebo [17], but the desired proki- anisms of constipation in the ICU setting. Besides netic effects rapidly decrease after 3 days [18], then their desired analgesic mode of action, opioids also bearing the risk of irreversible tardive dyskinesia, interact with opioid receptors within the enteric which is directly related to the length and dosage nervous system. In fact, gastrointestinal motility of administration [16&&] and/or pre-existing extra- correlates indirectly with the number of enteric pyramidal symptoms. Patients with brain injury neurones that release opioidergic peptides and seem to be less responsive to its prokinetic effects. express opioid receptors. These substances are the The macrolide antibiotic erythromycin acts as a key players in the enteric regulation of motility and motilin agonist, and in a single dose of as low as secretion [10]. Impaired gastrointestinal motility 70 mg has been shown to stimulate antral, pyloric, therefore seems to be a consequence of increased and duodenal motility [19]. Studies have shown that opioid receptor agonists (opioids) disconnecting the this therapy is superior to MCP and highly successful physiological neuroenteric regulation of the gut in promoting enteral feeding in patients with high [11]. Endogenous and exogenous opioids cause a gastric residual volumes [18]. However, prolonged presynaptic decrease of acetylcholine and other erythromycin administration (>3 or 4 days) is excitatory transmitters leading to tonic cramps of associated with reduced efficacity [18]. This is 1363-1950 ß 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins www.co-clinicalnutrition.com 167 Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. Nutrition and the intensive care unit supported by animal studies showing downregula- MEDICATIONS tion of motilin receptors after long-term erythromy- Current pharmacological treatment options for gut cin administration [20]. Recent data from humans dysmotility include either a nonspecific combi- confirm that the success of enteral feeding is inver- nation of laxatives and prokinetics or a specific sely proportional to plasma erythromycin concen- treatment option with opioid receptor antagonists. trations [16&&]. Laxatives ALTERNATIVES TO PROKINETICS The use of laxatives in the treatment of constipation is The clinical