DOCSLIB.ORG

Neoliberal and Militarised Post-Politics: Four Social Regimes, Four Affects and Radical Politics Today Ali Rıza Taşkale Thesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Neoliberal and Militarised Post-Politics: Four Social Regimes, Four Affects and Radical Politics Today Ali Rıza Taşkale Thesis Neoliberal and Militarised Post-Politics: Four Social Regimes, Four Affects and Radical Politics Today Ali Rıza Taşkale Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Geography, The University of Sheffield February 2013 ii Abstract This dissertation theorises the depoliticised conditions of late capitalism through what I call a ‘neoliberal and militarised post-politics.’ It argues that ours is a neoliberal and militarised post-political society that cannot imagine disruptive revolutionary events. The dissertation addresses key debates on governmental social regimes of neoliberal post-politics, the inseparability of neoliberalism and war/militarism, and the historical/geographical unevenness of global capitalism. In so doing, it offers an original topological analysis that makes the following critical interventions: an exploration of how the much-discussed social regimes of sovereignty, discipline and control relate to each other in the production of neoliberal governmentality; an analysis of the affective logic each regime entails and how they inter-relate; a proposal for a fourth regime, ‘terrorism’, and a theorisation of its associated affect, ‘spite.’ Finally, radical critique as divine violence is set against neoliberal and militarised post-politics. iii iv Acknowledgements Special thanks are due here to Eric Olund, my primary supervisor, for his patience and guidance as well as constant encouragement and support through the travails of writing and completing the dissertation. Thanks are also due to Jessica Dubow, my second supervisor, for her exemplary readings and invaluable comments on the chapters which now make up this dissertation. The support I have received from Benjamin Hennig and Lukáš Makovický throughout the dissertation has, of course, been inestimable. And many thanks to Julian Müller, Ali Duran Topuz, Tomas Marttila and Kim Kullman for their valuable contributions throughout the various stages of the dissertation. I am very grateful to Bülent Diken. Without creative, ‘disruptive’ ideas he taught me this dissertation would doubtless have assumed a different and more limited form. He remains a most inspiring figure, as a man and as a thinker. I would like to thank the University of Sheffield for granting me a 3 year full-time Ph.D. studentship, which has meant a lot for the progress of the dissertation. I am also thankful to the support and administrative staff at the University of Sheffield Geography Department, particularly Emma v Shelton, Peter Bragg, Laura Pitts and Thom Sullivan for cooperation and facilitation. vi vii This dissertation is dedicated to my parents, Yeter and Ali Asker Taşkale. viii ix Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................................... v Chapter One .................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Agonism ................................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Social Regime ...................................................................................................... 19 1.4 Topologies of Power ........................................................................................... 28 1.5 Research Questions ............................................................................................ 31 1.6 Deleuze/Foucault................................................................................................ 32 1.7 Žižek .................................................................................................................... 35 1.8 Nietzsche ............................................................................................................ 36 1.9 Benjamin ............................................................................................................. 37 1.10 Chapter Outline .................................................................................................. 41 Chapter Two .................................................................................................................................................. 48 Neoliberal and Militarised Post-Politics ......................................................................................................... 48 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 48 2.2 Model: The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte ............................................... 50 2.3 Neoliberal and Militarised Post-Politics ..................................................................... 68 2.3.1 The Euro Crisis .................................................................................................... 85 2.3.2 Militarisation of Society ...................................................................................... 88 Chapter Three .............................................................................................................................................. 100 Sovereignty.................................................................................................................................................. 100 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 100 3.2 Sovereignty .............................................................................................................. 109 3.3 Ressentiment ........................................................................................................... 118 3.4 Torture ..................................................................................................................... 122 3.4.1 Torture is Aesthetic ........................................................................................... 134 3.4.2 Torture is Political ............................................................................................. 135 3.5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 138 Chapter Four ................................................................................................................................................ 141 Discipline and the Birth of Neoliberal Governmentality ............................................................................... 141 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 141 4.2 Discipline .................................................................................................................. 142 4.3 The Panopticon ........................................................................................................ 146 4.4 The Rule of Law ........................................................................................................ 154 4.5 Fear .......................................................................................................................... 161 4.6 The Political Theology of Biopolitics ........................................................................ 166 4.6.1 Katechon ........................................................................................................... 169 4.6.2 Eschaton ........................................................................................................... 173 4.7 Geographies of Kettling ........................................................................................... 179 Chapter Five ................................................................................................................................................ 188 Understanding Neoliberal Control ............................................................................................................... 188 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 188 5.2 Neoliberal Control ................................................................................................... 189 5.3 Neoliberal Capitalism and Cynicism ......................................................................... 200 5.4 Debt as a Mode of Governance ............................................................................... 206 5.5 Preemptive Indifference .......................................................................................... 213 5.5.1 Preemption ....................................................................................................... 217 5.5.2 Indifference ....................................................................................................... 220 5.6 The Body Politic of Preemptive Indifference ........................................................... 230 5.7 Gated Communities ................................................................................................. 235 5.8 Conclusion ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Enacting Democracy: Deliberation, Agonism, and the Empty Place of Political Action
    Enacting democracy: Deliberation, agonism, and the empty place of political action Erin Pineda1 Department of Political Science, Yale University [email protected] Abstract Despite the celebrated place of political action – and in particular, the kinds of contentious collective action characterized by protest – in the history of modern democracy, it is notably absent in recent deliberative and agonist theorizing. In the midst of a debate centered on the dynamics of conflict, consensus, disagreement, diversity, and popular sovereignty in a democracy, a curiously empty place has opened up between the two sides: while the political action of social movements and collectivities operates as an important referent for both deliberative democrats and their agonist critics, both have tended to stop short of theorizing the ways social movements act to provoke, promote, and protest particular forms and modes of our shared public and democratic life. This paper argues that contentious, collective political action, though involving both deliberative and agonistic elements, is not well-captured by either theory. A better understanding of the dynamics of political action -- both descriptively and normatively -- is crucial to any understanding of the kinds of social and democratic changes valued by both deliberative democrats and agonists. Introduction In some ways, the most potent image of the history of democracy is that of the people, filling the streets or the public square, engaged in the contentious, collective act of protest. From a bloody, revolutionary baptism at the Bastille to more recent events – revolutionary, reformist, or somewhere in between – in Tahrir Square, Gezi Park, and dozens of “Occupy” sites across the U.S., the particular forms of political action undertaken by citizens in assembly, organized dissent, and collective demonstration have proven a vital part not only of foundings (and re-foundings), but have served as incomparable mechanisms for the maintenance, reform, revitalization, disruption and transformation of political practices and institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Agonism Contra Liberalism
    Agonistic Critiques of Liberalism: Perfection and Emancipation Thomas Fossen1 Utrecht University Published in Contemporary Political Theory, 2008, 7, (376–394) http://www.palgrave-journals.com/cpt/journal/v7/n4/abs/cpt200815a.html Abstract: Agonism is a political theory that places contestation at the heart of politics. Agonistic theorists charge liberal theory with a depoliticization of pluralism through an excessive focus on consensus. This paper examines the agonistic critiques of liberalism from a normative perspective. I argue that by itself the argument from pluralism is not sufficient to support an agonistic account of politics, but points to further normative commitments. Analyzing the work of Mouffe, Honig, Connolly, and Owen, I identify two normative currents of agonistic theory: emancipatory agonism, aimed at challenging violence and exclusion, and perfectionist agonism, aimed at the cultivation of nobility. From a normative perspective the former presents an internal challenge to liberalism, while the latter constitutes an external challenge to liberalism by providing a competing account of the ends of politics. Recognition of the distinction between emancipatory and perfectionist agonism is crucial in assessing the purchase of agonistic critiques of liberalism. Furthermore, this analysis draws us beyond the simple opposition between contestation and consensus. It is not simply a question of valuing genuine pluralism and therefore criticizing consensus; rather the question comes to be: what are the ends of politics? Introduction Agonism can be defined as a political theory that does not place any institutions, procedures, principles, or values beyond political contestation; that precludes final closure on any question. In doing so, it challenges some of the fundamental commitments of the liberal paradigm as embodied in political liberalism and deliberative democracy, most fundamentally the idea that the legitimacy of a political regime relies on a consensus among rational or reasonable citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poetics of Commitment in Modern Persian: a Case of Three Revolutionary Poets in Iran
    The Poetics of Commitment in Modern Persian: A Case of Three Revolutionary Poets in Iran by Samad Josef Alavi A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Shahwali Ahmadi, Chair Professor Muhammad Siddiq Professor Robert Kaufman Fall 2013 Abstract The Poetics of Commitment in Modern Persian: A Case of Three Revolutionary Poets in Iran by Samad Josef Alavi Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Studies University of California, Berkeley Professor Shahwali Ahmadi, Chair Modern Persian literary histories generally characterize the decades leading up to the Iranian Revolution of 1979 as a single episode of accumulating political anxieties in Persian poetics, as in other areas of cultural production. According to the dominant literary-historical narrative, calls for “committed poetry” (she‘r-e mota‘ahhed) grew louder over the course of the radical 1970s, crescendoed with the monarch’s ouster, and then faded shortly thereafter as the consolidation of the Islamic Republic shattered any hopes among the once-influential Iranian Left for a secular, socio-economically equitable political order. Such a narrative has proven useful for locating general trends in poetic discourses of the last five decades, but it does not account for the complex and often divergent ways in which poets and critics have reconciled their political and aesthetic commitments. This dissertation begins with the historical assumption that in Iran a question of how poetry must serve society and vice versa did in fact acquire a heightened sense of urgency sometime during the ideologically-charged years surrounding the revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Opposition Grows As Iraq Occupation Festers
    Human power is its own end"—Karl Marx MBER/DECEMBER 2005 WORKSHOPTALKS Mass opposition grows Targeting Blacks as as Iraq occupation festers any quarter. Even the heavy lift­ domestic terrorists ing performed by the Kurdish nationalist leaders in shaping by Georgiana Williams and endorsing the document We have to talk about police abuse in Los Angeles. failed to generate a large turnout Devon Brown was a 13-year-old African American who of voters in the Kurdish region. took a joy ride in a car. The police were chasing him. NEW CONSTITUTION They riddled his body with bullets. Since then, they put 80 bullets in the car of a young man in Compton, but At the close of the period of none of them hit him. Another brother in Compton had fvote counting the official a police chase, and they beat him like they did Rodney 5 announcement was that the con- King—and that brother is in jail. None of these police [I'stitution passed. There had been has been taken off the police force. ]g great anxiety among the parties J making up Iraq's government There are about 300 women in LA whose sons have a that the constitution might be been killed by drive-by shootings. They have organized | rejected in three of Iraq's and meet every Tuesday. It's a good group, they're 5 provinces and thus not meet the doing a lot of good work against police abuse. But the '"g legal criteria for success. reason I didn't join is because the Nation of Islam is a big part of this group, and I don't trust them.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Editions 133
    MILAN St. PROTIĆ BETWEEN DEMOCRACY AND POPULISM POLITICAL IDEAS OF THE PEOPLE’S RADICAL PARTY IN SERBIA (The Formative Period: 1860’s to 1903) BETWEEN AND POPULISM DEMOCRACY , Protić . t M. S ISBN 978-86-7179-094-9 BELGRADE 2015 http://www.balkaninstitut.com MILAN St. PROTIĆ BETWEEN DEMOCRACY AND POPULISM POLITICAL IDEAS OF THE PEOPLE’S RADICAL PARTY IN SERBIA (The Formative Period: 1860’s to 1903) http://www.balkaninstitut.com INSTITUTE FOR BALKAN STUDIES SERBIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES AND ARTS SPECIAL EDITIONS 133 MILAN St. PROTIĆ BETWEEN DEMOCRACY AND POPULISM POLITICAL IDEAS OF THE PEOPLE’S RADICAL PARTY IN SERBIA (The Formative Period: 1860’s to 1903) Editor-in-Chief Dušan T. Bataković Director of the Institute for Balkan Studies BELGRADE 2015 http://www.balkaninstitut.com Publisher Institute for Balkan Studies Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts Belgrade, Knez Mihailova 35/IV Serbia www.balkaninstitut.com e-mail: [email protected] Reviewers Vojislav Stanovčić, member of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts Vojislav Pavlović, Institute for Balkan Studies, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts Written in English by Author Design by Kranislav Vranić Printed by SVEN, Niš ISBN 978-86-7179-094-9 http://www.balkaninstitut.com Table of Contents Preface . 7 Prologue . 11 Chapter One THE ORIGINS . 17 Chapter Two THE HISTORY . 35 Chapter Three THE SOURCES . 61 Chapter Four THE CHARACTERISTICS . 83 Chapter Five THE STRUCTURE . 103 Chapter Six THE LEADERS . 121 EPILOGUE . 149 Bibliography. 173 Index . 185 http://www.balkaninstitut.com http://www.balkaninstitut.com PREFACE hen, upon my return from Bern, Switzerland, it was suggested to me Wto consider the publication of my Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Shields James 2014 Numata Paper.Pdf
    One Village, One Mind? 2014 Eto Tekirei, Tolstoy, and the Structure of 20–21, Agrarian-Buddhist Utopianism in Taishō Japan permission March noa, ā author's M at the Future and Hawai‘i without of quote Present, not do Past, University the and at paper Religions: this Studies James Mark Shields of Bucknell University Japanese International Research Center for Japanese Studies source and Buddhist in the Numata Conference in Buddhist Studies Violence, Nonviolence and Japanese Religions: Past, Present & Future Nonviolence, Conference 20–21 March 2014 acknowledge Violence, Please Numata 1 SHIELDS: One Village, One Mind? [PREZI 1 – 4]: ON THE BOOK • The primary task of the book is to provide a detailed, critical, and comparative analysis of the intellectual genealogy (and geography) of various forms of “modernist” and “progressive” Buddhism that 2014 emerged during the five decades leading up to the Pacific War— including the implications of such for postwar and contemporary 20–21, Buddhism in Japan and beyond. A secondary goal is to bring some light to the grey and underexposed areas that lie within and between permission March various conceptions and manifestations of “progress,” “reform” and noa, “modernity” in the formative period of modern Japanese Buddhism. ā author's M at the • I employ the term progressive to refer to a person or group that: a) is Future concerned with broad-based social welfare; b) believes that society can and should be refashioned along lines that will enhance social, and Hawai‘i without political and economic equality; and c) is engaged in sustained “criti- of cal engagement” with prevailing ideological structures.1 This second quote Present, and third aspect correlate with what has elsewhere been called the not “threshold of modernity”; i.e., the point at which it is recognized that do Past, University the order of society is not natural or ordained, but is rather the prod- the and uct of social, historical and economic forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews
    Il Mulino - Rivisteweb John Veugelers Alessandro Orsini, ”Anatomy of the Red Brigades: The Religious Mind-set of Modern Terrorists”. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2011, 317 pp. (doi: 10.2383/72713) Sociologica (ISSN 1971-8853) Fascicolo 3, settembre-dicembre 2012 Ente di afferenza: () Copyright c by Societ`aeditrice il Mulino, Bologna. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Per altre informazioni si veda https://www.rivisteweb.it Licenza d’uso L’articolo `emesso a disposizione dell’utente in licenza per uso esclusivamente privato e personale, senza scopo di lucro e senza fini direttamente o indirettamente commerciali. Salvo quanto espressamente previsto dalla licenza d’uso Rivisteweb, `efatto divieto di riprodurre, trasmettere, distribuire o altrimenti utilizzare l’articolo, per qualsiasi scopo o fine. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Book reviews Alessandro Orsini, Anatomy of the Red Brigades: The Religious Mind-set of Modern Terrorists. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2011, 317 pp. 10.2383/72713 Perhaps due to the 1978 kidnapping and cold-blooded assassination of former Prime Minister Aldo Moro, the Red Brigades remains the best-known among the cluster of extremist groups associated with the anni di piombo, the period of heightened mobil- ization and violence by revolutionary leftists and neo-fascist activists in Italy from the late 1960s until the early 1980s. In examining the Red Brigades, this book aims to answer three questions: “1. Who are the Red Brigades? 2. Why do they kill? 3. Where do they come from, what is their historic-political tradition?” (p. 285). The answer offered here is that the Red Brigades were animated by a quasi-religious conception of politics that combined utopian goals with acceptance of violent means.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Dostoevsky's View of the Russian Soul and Its Impact on the Russian Question in the Brothers Karamazov Paul C. Schlau
    ABSTRACT Dostoevsky’s View of the Russian Soul and its Impact on the Russian Question in The Brothers Karamazov Paul C. Schlaudraff Director: Adrienne M. Harris, Ph.D Fyodor Dostoevsky, one of Russia’s most renowned novelists, profoundly affected the way that Russia would think of itself in the years following his death. One of the most important issues for Dostoevsky and other authors at the time was the reconciliation of the peasant and noble classes in the aftermath of the serf emancipation in Russia. Dostoevsky believed that the solution to this issue would come from the Russian peasantry. My research investigates Dostoevsky’s view of the “Russian soul”, which is the particular set of innate characteristics which distinguishes Russians from other nationalities. Furthermore, it examines how Dostoevsky’s view of the Russian soul affected his answer to the question of Russia’s ultimate destiny. During the 19th century, socialism was an especially popular answer to that question. Dostoevsky, however, presented an entirely different solution. Through a thorough examination of Dostoevsky’s final novel, The Brothers Karamazov, my thesis demonstrates this alternative solution and its significance in light of competing Russian theory during the 19th century. APPROVED BY DIRECTOR OF HONORS THESIS ______________________________________________________ Dr. Adrienne M. Harris, Department of Modern Languages APPROVED BY THE HONORS PROGRAM: ______________________________________________ Dr. Andrew Wisely, Director DATE: ________________________ DOSTOEVSKY’S VIEW OF THE RUSSIAN SOUL AND ITS IMPACT ON THE RUSSIAN QUESTION IN THE BROTHERS KARAMAZOV A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Baylor University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Honors Program By Paul C.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Vladimir Makovsky
    ABSTRACT VLADIMIR MAKOVSKY: THE POLITICS OF NINETEENTH-CENTURY RUSSIAN REALISM Tessa J. Crist, M.A. School of Art and Design Northern Illinois University, 2015 Barbara Jaffee, Director This thesis examines the political work produced by a little-known Russian Realist, Vladimir Makovsky (1846-1920), while he was a member of the nineteenth-century art collective Peredvizhniki. Increasingly recognized for subtle yet insistent opposition to the tsarist regime and the depiction of class distinctions, the work of the Peredvizhniki was for decades ignored by modernist art history as the result of an influential article, “Avant-Garde and Kitsch,” written by American art critic Clement Greenberg in 1939. In this article, Greenberg suggests the work of Ilya Repin, the most renowned member of the Peredvizhniki, should be regarded not as art, but as “kitsch”--the industrialized mass culture of an urban working class. Even now, scholars who study the Peredvizhniki concern themselves with the social history of the group as a whole, rather than with the merits of specific artworks. Taking a different approach to analyzing the significance of the Peredvizhniki and of Makovsky specifically this thesis harnesses the powerful methodologies devised in the 1970s by art historians T.J. Clark and Michael Fried, two scholars who are largely responsible for reopening the dialogue on the meaning and significance of Realism in the history of modern art. NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY DE KALB, ILLINOIS MAY 2015 VLADIMIR MAKOVSKY: THE POLITICS OF NINETEENTH-CENTURY RUSSIAN REALISM BY TESSA J. CRIST ©2015 Tessa J. Crist A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTERS OF ARTS SCHOOL OF ART AND DESIGN Thesis Director: Barbara Jaffee TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sandberg on Orsini, 'Anatomy of the Red Brigades: the Religious Mind-Set of Modern Terrorists'
    H-War Sandberg on Orsini, 'Anatomy of the Red Brigades: The Religious Mind-Set of Modern Terrorists' Review published on Thursday, October 10, 2013 Alessandro Orsini. Anatomy of the Red Brigades: The Religious Mind-Set of Modern Terrorists. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2011. vi + 317 pp. $29.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8014-4986-4. Reviewed by Brian Sandberg (Northern Illinois University) Published on H-War (October, 2013) Commissioned by Margaret Sankey Political violence shook modern Italian society during the anni di piombo, or Years of Lead (1969-83). Beginning in 1969, the left-wing Brigate rosse (Red Brigades) carried out numerous shootings, kidnappings, and assassinations of politicians, judges, professors, and civil servants. The Red Brigades’ most notorious attack was the audacious kidnapping and assassination of former Italian prime minister Aldo Moro in 1978. In the same period, the Brigate nere (Black Brigades), composed of right-wing militants, organized their own bombings and assassinations against political and economic targets. Although the attacks tapered off in the 1980s, the trauma of this turbulent period continues to haunt Italian society. Italian politics arguably still reflects the deep divisions of the anni di piombo, and the historical memory of the violence has not yet been seriously examined.[1] Alessandro Orsini’s Anatomy of the Red Brigades: The Religious Mind-Set of Modern Terrorists proposes a new reading of the violence of the Red Brigades. The book was originally published in Italian asAnatomia delle Brigate rosse: Le radici ideologiche del terrorismo rivoluzionario (2009). This English-language translation now introduces the Red Brigades and their ideology to broader audiences interested in political violence and terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • DEMOCRATIC POLITICS and AGONISTIC PLURALISM Chantal Mouffe
    SEMINARIO INTERDISCIPLINAR O( S) SENTIDO (S) DA (S) CULTURA (S) COORDINADO POR RAMÓN MAIZ DEMOCRATIC POLITICS AND AGONISTIC PLURALISM Chantal Mouffe Venres, 18 de decembro de 2009 17:00 horas Consello da Cultura Galega 1 Chantal Mouffe Politóloga formada en Louvain, París e Essex, Chantal Mouffe (Bélxica, 1943) é Profesora de Teoría Política na Universidade de Westminster, Londres. Nos últimos anos, impartiu aulas en diferentes universidades de Europa, Norte América e Sul América e realizou estancias de investigación en Harvard, Cornell, Universidade de California, Instituto de Estudos Avanzados de Princeton e Centro Nacional de Investigación Científica de París. Entre 1989 e 1995, foi Directora de Programa no Colexio Internacional de Filosofía de París. Chantal Mouffe é unha das pensadoras máis influíntes no eido da filosofía política actual. Compiladora de obras como Gramsci and Marxist Theory , Dimensions of Radical Democracy , Deconstruction and Pragmatism , ou The Challenge of Carl Schmitt ; é tamén coautora (con Ernesto Laclau) de Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (1985). Asemade, ten publicadas The Return of the Political (1993), The Democratic Paradox (2000) ou On the Political (2005), ademais de numerosos artigos sobre pensamento político (Carl Scmitt) e teoría política (Paixóns e política). Na actualidade, Mouffe está a elaborar unha aproximación non racionalista á teoría política, fundamentada na súa formulación do concepto de ‘democracia agónica’, e participa en diferentes proxectos de
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Agonism: Conflict and Contestation in Divided Societies Written by Kathryn Harvey
    Democratic Agonism: Conflict and Contestation in Divided Societies Written by Kathryn Harvey This PDF is auto-generated for reference only. As such, it may contain some conversion errors and/or missing information. For all formal use please refer to the official version on the website, as linked below. Democratic Agonism: Conflict and Contestation in Divided Societies https://www.e-ir.info/2012/10/20/democratic-agonism-conflict-and-contestation-in-divided-societies/ KATHRYN HARVEY, OCT 20 2012 Democratic Agonism: Conflict and Contestation in Divided Societies Applying the Theoretical Assumptions of Chantal Mouffe and William Connolly to the Case of Turkey Introduction The last twenty years have seen an unprecedented attempt to revitalise democracy. Populist anxieties, along with the dominance of corporate and media elites, the lack of real political alternatives, the limitations of most models of democratic representation and the political distortions produced by vast inequalities in wealth all point to an urgent need to rethink democracy (Newman, 2008: 228). Democratic theory is now rich in trends and models, offering different ways of reading what a democratic order should entail. The divergences within and between these theories tend to be based on a constitutive tension within democracy itself, and can be said to reflect the debate between the modernist and post-modernist political discourses. The antagonism is embodied in the articulation of democracy as a type of political regime with distinct institutions, and as a form of politics which embodies its own indeterminacy, which is contingent on and open to new and unpredictable articulations. The latter of these perspectives is articulated by the post-modernist thinkers Chantal Mouffe and William Connolly, and can be said to constitute what is variously referred to as “democratic agonism”, “agonistic democracy” and “political agonism”.
    [Show full text]