DECISION NOTICE AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Blue River and KP Creek Wild and Scenic River Suitability Study USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests Alpine and Clifton Ranger Districts Greenlee County, Arizona DECISION NOTICE Action and Its Purpose The Forest Service has conducted an environmental analysis to evaluate the suitability of four eligible river segments of the Blue River and one eligible river segment of KP Creek (a tributary to the Blue River) on the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests in Arizona for inclusion into the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. The analysis was conducted pursuant to section 5(d)(1) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. The analysis is described in the Environmental Assessment for Blue River and KP Creek Wild and Scenic River Suitability Study. The suitability of these river segments is being considered at this time due to a proposal to construct a channel-spanning fish barrier in segment 4 of the Blue River on the Clifton Ranger District. KP Creek has been included in this analysis because it is a tributary to Blue River above the barrier site that supports a valuable native fishery. Both Blue River and KP Creek were identified as potential eligible rivers in the Resource Information Report, Potential Wild- Scenic-Recreation River Designation, National Forests in Arizona (USFS 1993) and confirmed as eligible in the Eligibility Report for the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (Apache-Sitgreaves NF 2009). In response to the USDI Bureau of Reclamation’s (BOR) proposal to build a channel-spanning fish barrier in the Blue River, I conducted an analysis of the potential effects on Blue River’s free-flowing characteristics (Appendix C). The analysis determined that the proposed barrier would affect the free-flowing character of Blue River. BOR’s proposed barrier is a conservation measure to protect federally listed threatened and endangered fishes, as required by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s 2008 Biological Opinion for the Central Arizona Project. Suitability provides the basis for determining whether to recommend a river as part of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. It is designed to answer the following questions: 1 Should the rivers’ free-flowing character, water quality, and outstandingly remarkable values (ORVs) be protected, or are one or more other uses important enough to warrant doing otherwise? Will the rivers’ free-flowing character, water quality, and ORVs be protected through designation? Is designation the best method for protecting the river corridors? Is there a demonstrated commitment to protect the river by any nonfederal entities that may be partially responsible for implementing protective management? This analysis is programmatic; that is, no specific on-the-ground actions are proposed or examined. The analysis of environmental effects addresses the potential changes in management which may occur if the eligible river segments are found suitable or unsuitable for designation into the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. It includes a general discussion of the effects if any or all segments are subsequently designated by Congress. Decision and Rationale My decision is a preliminary administrative recommendation that will receive further review and possible modification by the Chief of the Forest Service, Secretary of Agriculture, and the President of the United States. Congress has reserved the authority to make final decisions on designation of rivers as part of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Based on the results of the analysis documented in the Environmental Assessment for the Blue River and KP Creek Wild and Scenic River Suitability Study, including public scoping and comments, it is my decision to select Alternative 3 which will also amend the Forest Plan (EA at page 45). The selected alternative (Alternative 3) was developed based on: comments that emphasized collaborative efforts with other agencies and local stakeholders; potential for water resource development (including the proposed fish barrier construction); consistency with other plans including the recovery plan for loach minnow (USFWS 1991), the Apache-Sitgreaves Land and Resource Management Plan (USFS 1987), and the Arizona State Wildlife Action Plan (AGFD 2006); and on the key issues described in the environmental assessment. In determining which river segments are suitable for recommendation in this decision, I placed the heaviest weight on the following key suitability criteria and factors: The consistency of designation with other agency plans and programs and, particularly, the biological opinion issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for the Central Arizona Plan with its focus on recovery of loach minnow and Chiricahua leopard frog. 2 The potential for construction of the proposed fish barrier in the lowermost portion of Segment 4 of Blue River. The interest in designation or nondesignation by other federal agencies, state, local and tribal governments, and national and local publics. Ability to protect regionally and nationally significant values. As a result, I am recommending Blue River Segments 2, 3 and 4a and the eligible segment of KP Creek for designation. I am not recommending Blue River Segments 1 and 4b. My rationale follows. Blue River – Segment 1. This 25.1 mile segment begins at the confluence of Campbell Blue and Dry Blue Creeks and flows downstream through the Smith Place to Bear Creek. This segment contains ORVs of scenery, recreation, geology, fish, wildlife, historic resources, prehistoric resources, and vegetation. It is classified as recreational. Approximately 17% of the acreage of this segment is privately owned, creating a pattern of mixed private and federal ownership. Collaborative planning efforts between local citizens, including the Upper Eagle Creek Watershed Association, the USDI Fish and Wildlife Service (Arizona Ecological Services Office), Arizona Game and Fish Department, USDI Bureau of Reclamation, and USDA Forest Service (Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests) have been ongoing to facilitate working together on watershed improvement, riparian improvement, and native fisheries restoration in the Eagle Creek and Blue River watersheds on non-Tribal lands within the watershed. I am not recommending this segment due, in part, to landowner concerns and because the important river values are protected on these lands through County zoning and landowner stewardship as evident in existing collaborative planning efforts. Significant portions of the National Forest System lands are located in the Blue Range Primitive Area, which is managed to emphasize wilderness recreation, while maintaining wilderness resource values. Blue River – Segments 2, 3 and 4a. Segment 2 is 16 miles, beginning at Bear Creek and flowing downstream to ¼ mile above the Blue River Trailhead. It is classified as wild. Segment 3 is 4.2 miles, beginning ¼ mile above the Blue River Trailhead and flowing to ½ mile below Forest Road 475. It is classified as scenic. Segment 4a is 7.34 miles, flowing from ½ mile below Forest Road 475 to 0.76 miles above the confluence of the Blue River with the San Francisco River. It is classified as wild. These segments contain ORVs of scenery, recreation, geology, fish, wildlife, historic resources, prehistoric resources, and vegetation. All three segments are entirely National Forest System lands. KP Creek: The KP Creek segment, which is 11.3 miles, begins near the Mogollon River and flows to the private land boundary in section 11, township 2 3 north, range 30 east. This segment contains ORVs of scenery, recreation, fish and wildlife. It is classified as wild, and is entirely National Forest System lands. I am recommending Blue River segments 2, 3, and 4a, and KP Creek to provide additional focus on protecting aquatic resources, consistent with recovery plans, and to protect their free-flowing condition and other important values for the long term. The potential benefits of designation include, but are not limited to, the development of a comprehensive river management plan to determine what additional direction is necessary to protect river values on these National Forest System lands. This planning process also provides the opportunity to promote public participation in developing goals for river protection and to identify technical assistance for river conservation for activities within the river corridors and elsewhere in the watershed. While most activities on Federal lands within the river corridors may continue, as they are generally protective of river values, designation affords certain legal protections from adverse development. The Act prohibits the construction of dams and other federally assisted water resources projects judged to have an adverse effect on river values. It also withdraws Federal lands within wild classified segments from locatable and leasable mineral entry. Portions of segment 2 and portions of KP Creek are in the Blue Range Primitive Area. This Area was designated by the Secretary of Agriculture in 1933 with direction to manage the included lands to emphasize wilderness recreation, while maintaining wilderness resource values. However the Administrative designation of the Blue Range Primitive Area allows for water resources projects that do not involve road construction and the Area is not withdrawn from either locatable or leasable mineral entry. If these segments are subsequently included in the National System, the Act will provide permanent additional