DIVERSITY of HONEY BEE Apis Mellifera SUBSPECIES (HYMENOPTERA: APIDAE) and THEIR ASSOCIATED ARTHROPOD PESTS in CAMEROON

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DIVERSITY of HONEY BEE Apis Mellifera SUBSPECIES (HYMENOPTERA: APIDAE) and THEIR ASSOCIATED ARTHROPOD PESTS in CAMEROON DIVERSITY OF HONEY BEE Apis mellifera SUBSPECIES (HYMENOPTERA: APIDAE) AND THEIR ASSOCIATED ARTHROPOD PESTS IN CAMEROON BY DAVID TEMBONG CHAM (I80/92221/2013) (B.Sc. UNIVERSITY OF BUEA-CAMEROON, M.PHIL. UNIVERSITY OF GHANA-LEGON) A THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILLMENT OF REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ENTOMOLOGY SCHOOL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI 2017 i DECLARATION Candidate I, DAVID TEMBONG CHAM, Registration Number I80/92221/2013, declare that this thesis is my original work and has not been submitted for award of a degree in any other University. Signature__________________________ Date ____________________________ Supervisors This thesis has been submitted with our approval Prof. Paul N. Ndegwa School of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya Signature __________________________ Date ____________________________ Prof. Lucy W. Irungu School of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya Signature __________________________ Date ____________________________ Dr. Ayuka T. Fombong International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P. O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya Signature __________________________ Date ____________________________ Prof. Suresh Raina International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), PO. BOX 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya Signature __________________________ Date ____________________________ ii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to the Cham’s family iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My sincere gratitude to my supervisors Prof. Paul N. Ndegwa, and Prof. Lucy W. Irungu of the University of Nairobi, and Dr. Ayuka T. Fombong and Prof. Suresh K. Raina of ICIPE for their guidance, invaluable suggestions, support, and reviews that led to the successful completion of this thesis and associated manuscripts. My gratitude also goes to Prof. Baldwyn Torto, Dr(s) Everlyn Nguku, Kiatoko Nkoba, Muli Elliud and David P. Tchouassi for their useful suggestions during research and contributions to the manuscripts that emanated from this thesis. I am also thankful to Dr. Daisy Salifu and Mr. Benedict Orindi for their guidance in data analysis. I also acknowledge the invaluable contributions from lecturers of the School of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi during Annual Postgraduate Seminars that contributed in improving the quality of this thesis. Special thanks to the anonymous reviewers of this thesis. I am very grateful to all the staff of Environmental Health, especially in the Bee Health Unit, ICIPE for their assistance and useful contributions during scientific presentations. My sincere gratitude go to Capacity Building and Institutional Development staff, especially Dr. Robert Skilton, Mrs. Lilian Igweta-Tonnang, Ms Atieno Vivian, Mrs Lisa Omondi, Mama Margaret Ochanda for administrative assistance and organization of the numerous trainings that boosted my research and writing skills. I acknowledge with appreciation the assistance provided by the Human Resources, Procurement, IT and other administrative Units of ICIPE. Special thanks go to the Ministry of Livestock, Fisheries and Animal Industries (MENIPIA) Cameroon for their support and guidance on the selection of apiary sites and beekeepers. My appreciation also goes to all the Regional Delegates, MINEPIA and the Delegates of beekeeping groups that provided assistance to me in any form during field surveys. I am very grateful to all the beekeepers that provided their apiaries for this study and for their assistance during sampling. Sincere gratitude to Dr (s) David Kupesa, Foba Caroline, Mr. David Makori, Mrs. Nelly Ndungu and to all my colleagues of ICIPE and University of Nairobi for their encouragement, scientific discussions and support. I am also very grateful to all my family members and friends especially my mum Angelina Cham, my aunt Prisca Cham, Dr. P. Ching, Dr. Ndong Cheng, Mr. and Mrs. iv Njana, Mr. and Mrs. Kah Hycinth, Mr. and Mrs. Fuh-Cham, Mr. Awah, Mr. and Mrs Cham Peter for their support, encouragement and prayers. Most importantly, I gratefully acknowledge the financial support for this research by the European Union (EU) under grant number EU/ICIPE 2013/313-659 and the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) In-Region Postgraduate Scholarship for my Ph.D. studies. I remain ever grateful to God for good health and guidance throughout this study, and especially for life. v TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ..................................................................................................ii DEDICATION .................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.................................................................................iv TABLE OF CONTENTS.....................................................................................vi LIST OF TABLES...............................................................................................xi LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................xii APPENDICES ...................................................................................................xiv ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS...........................................................xv DEFINITION OF TERMINOLOGIES .............................................................xvi ABSTRACT..................................................................................................... xvii CHAPTER ONE .................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................1 1.1 General introduction ............................................................................................................1 1.2 Problem statement................................................................................................................3 1.3 Justification and significance of the study...........................................................................4 1.4 Objectives ............................................................................................................................5 1.4.1 Main objective ..................................................................................................................5 1.4.2 Specific objectives ............................................................................................................5 CHAPTER TWO ................................................................................................................6 LITERATURE REVIEW ..........................................................................................................6 2.1 Apis mellifera and related species of the genus Apis ...........................................................6 2.1.1 Diversity and geographic distribution of Apis species......................................................6 2.1.2 Origin and classification of Apis mellifera .......................................................................7 2.1.3 Diversity of Apis mellifera subspecies..............................................................................8 2.1.4 Apis mellifera lineages and their distribution .................................................................10 2.1.5 Methods for characterising Apis mellifera subspecies....................................................10 2.1.5.1 Morphological methods ...............................................................................................11 vi 2.1.5.2 Molecular techniques ...................................................................................................12 2.1.6 The Apis mellifera colony and life history......................................................................13 2.1.7 Ecological and economic importance of honey bees......................................................14 2.2 Honey bee parasites and pests............................................................................................16 2.2.1 Honey bee parasites ........................................................................................................16 2.2.1.1 Varroa mite..................................................................................................................17 2.2.1.2 Tracheal mite Acarapis woodi .....................................................................................18 2.2.1.3 Tropilaelaps clareae ....................................................................................................19 2.2.1.4 Endoparasitic flies........................................................................................................21 2.2.2 Honey bee pests ..............................................................................................................23 2.2.2.1 Aethina tumida and other Nitidulids............................................................................23 2.2.2.2 Large hive beetles ........................................................................................................24 2.2.2.3 Moths ...........................................................................................................................25 2.2.2.3 Bee louse......................................................................................................................26 2.3 Predatory flies of honey bees.............................................................................................26
Recommended publications
  • Acarapis Woodi (Rennie) and Varroa Destructor Q
    Occurrence Of Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Parasites Acarapis woodi (Rennie) and Varroa destructor Q. In The Region of Muğla, Turkey Msc. Duygu Şimşek*, Prof. Dr. Nevin KESKİN* *Hacettepe University, Department of Biology, Applied Biology Section, Ankara-TURKEY e-mail:[email protected] INTRODUCTION Another mite which causes a disease in adult honeybees is Acarapis woodi. According to the some studies carried in different periods between the years 1988-2003, there is no evidence for A. woodi which has This study was carried out to determine the occurrence of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) parasites Acarapis been spread out in Balkans in recent years (3, 7). However, this parasite was detected in a country- woodi (Rennie) and Varroa destructor in the province of Muğla which has 17% of the hives and governs %80- wide study which was carried out with molecular techniques by Hacettepe University Bee Health Laboratory in 2005 (12). In this study, there is no evidence for A. woodi existence in samples according to the 85 of the honey export of our country. microscopic(Figure 3) and molecular assays. Varroa destructor Q (Acari, Varroidae) is a haemolymph-sucking parasite of European honey bees (9). The parasite may directly (haemolymph-sucking) and indirectly (as a vector of bacterial, fungal and viral diseases) affect the type and prevalence of honey bee pathogens causing mortality in infested colonies (2). It can be found on adult bees, on the brood and in hive debris. Adult females are a reddish colored oval-flat bodied and measured 1.1 mm long x 1.5 mm wide.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes Entomologist
    Vol. 28, No.3 &4 Fall/Winter 1995 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST PUBLISHED BY THE MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Published by the Michigan Entomological Society Volume 28 No.3 & 4 ISSN 0090-0222 TABLE OF CONTENTS Temperature effects on development of three cereal aphid porasitoids {Hymenoptera: Aphidiidael N. C. Elliott,J. D. Burd, S. D. Kindler, and J. H. Lee........................... .............. 199 Parasitism of P/athypena scabra (Lepidoptera: Noctuidael by Sinophorus !eratis (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) David M. Pavuk, Charles E. Williams, and Douglas H. Taylor ............. ........ 205 An allometric study of the boxelder bug, Boiseo Irivillata (Heteroptera: Rhopolidoe) Scott M. Bouldrey and Karin A. Grimnes ....................................... ..... 207 S/aferobius insignis (Heleroptera: Lygaeidael: association with granite ledges and outcrops in Minnesota A. G. Wheeler, Jr. .. ...................... ....................... ............. ....... 213 A note on the sympotric collection of Chymomyza (Dipiero: Drosophilidael in Virginio's Allegheny Mountains Henretta Trent Bond ................ .. ............................ .... ............ ... ... 217 Economics of cell partitions and closures produced by Passa/oecus cuspidafus (Hymenoptera: Sphecidael John M. Fricke.... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 221 Distribution of the milliped Narceus american us annularis (Spirabolida: Spirobolidae) in Wisconsin Dreux J. Watermolen. ................................................................... 225
    [Show full text]
  • Life History of the Honey Bee Tracheal Mite (Acari: Tarsonemidae)
    ARTHROPOD BIOLOGY Life History of the Honey Bee Tracheal Mite (Acari: Tarsonemidae) JEFFERY S. PETTIS1 AND WILLIAM T. WILSON Honey Bee Research Unit, USDA-ARS, 2413 East Highway 83, Weslaco, TX 78596 Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 89(3): 368-374 (1996) ABSTRACT Data on the seasonal reproductive patterns of the honey bee tracheal mite, Acarapis woodi (Rennie), were obtained by dissecting host honey bees, Apis mellifera L., at intervals during their life span. Mite reproduction normally was limited to 1 complete gen- eration per host bee, regardless of host life span. However, limited egg laying by foundress progeny was observed. Longer lived bees in the fall and winter harbored mites that reproduced for a longer period than did mites in bees during spring and summer. Oviposition rate was relatively uniform at =0.85 eggs per female per day during the initial 16 d of adult bee life regardless of season. In all seasons, peak mite populations occurred in bees =24 d old, with egg laying declining rapidly beyond day 24 in spring and summer bees but more slowly in fall and winter bees. Stadial lengths of eggs and male and female larvae were 5, 4, and 5 d, respectively. Sex ratio ranged from 1.15:1 to 2.01:1, female bias, but because males are not known to migrate they would have been overestimated in the sampling scheme. Fecundity was estimated to be =21 offspring, assuming daughter mites laid limited eggs in tracheae before dispersal. Mortality of adult mites increased with host age; an estimate of 35 d for female mite longevity was indirectly obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Bee Forage Use), Services (Pollination Services) and Threats (Hive Theft and Vandalism
    An assessment of different beekeeping practices in South Africa based on their needs (bee forage use), services (pollination services) and threats (hive theft and vandalism) by Tlou Samuel Masehela Dissertation presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology in the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Dr Ruan Veldtman March 2017 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis/dissertation electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. March 2017 Copyright © 2017 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za General summary Two honey bee subspecies indigenous to South Africa, Apis mellifera capensis Escholtz (Cape honey bee) and Apis mellifera scutellata Lepeletier, are actively managed by beekeepers for honey production, other bee related products (e.g. bees wax) and to provide pollination services. Historic records show that managed colonies of both subspecies to rely on a mix of exotic - (Eucalyptus species, agricultural crops, weeds and suburban plantings) and indigenous forage (genera and vegetation units). However, their extent of use and importance for honey production, pollination, colony maintenance and swarm trapping (together referred to as beekeeping practices), have not been fully explored across South Africa. Additionally, acts of hive theft and vandalism have become a key concern for the industry, threatening and potentially limiting beekeeping in some areas.
    [Show full text]
  • OVERWINTERING PERFORMANCE of HONEY BEE COLONIES HEAVILY INFESTED with ACARAPIS WOODI (RENNIE) Frank A
    OVERWINTERING PERFORMANCE OF HONEY BEE COLONIES HEAVILY INFESTED WITH ACARAPIS WOODI (RENNIE) Frank A. Eischen To cite this version: Frank A. Eischen. OVERWINTERING PERFORMANCE OF HONEY BEE COLONIES HEAV- ILY INFESTED WITH ACARAPIS WOODI (RENNIE). Apidologie, Springer Verlag, 1987, 18 (4), pp.293-304. hal-00890720 HAL Id: hal-00890720 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00890720 Submitted on 1 Jan 1987 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. OVERWINTERING PERFORMANCE OF HONEY BEE COLONIES HEAVILY INFESTED WITH ACARAPIS WOODI (RENNIE) Frank A. EISCHEN Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602 SUMMARY Three groups of honey bee colonies (N = 30) were overwintered on a mountainside (2800 M) in northeastern Mexico. Infestation levels of Acarapis woodi in the three groups averaged 0, 28.2 and 86.0 % for the control, moderately, and heavily infested colonies, respectively. Heavily infested colonies were 28 % smaller than controls (P < 0.01) in the fall. Adjusting for this, heavily infested colonies lost significantly more bees than either the moderately infested group, or the controls (P < 0.0001). Both the moderately and heavily infested groups of bees had less brood than controls at the end of the test (P < 0.02 and P < 0.01 respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Classical and Geometric Morphometric Methods To
    Comparing classical and geometric morphometric methods to discriminate between the South African honey bee subspecies Apis mellifera scutellata and Apis mellifera capensis (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Tomas Bustamante, Benjamin Baiser, James D. Ellis To cite this version: Tomas Bustamante, Benjamin Baiser, James D. Ellis. Comparing classical and geometric morphome- tric methods to discriminate between the South African honey bee subspecies Apis mellifera scutel- lata and Apis mellifera capensis (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Apidologie, 2020, 51 (1), pp.123-136. 10.1007/s13592-019-00651-6. hal-03060423 HAL Id: hal-03060423 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03060423 Submitted on 14 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Apidologie (2020) 51:123–136 Original article * INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature, 2019 DOI: 10.1007/s13592-019-00651-6 Comparing classical and geometric morphometric methods to discriminate between the South African honey bee subspecies Apis mellifera scutellata and Apis mellifera capensis (Hymenoptera: Apidae) 1 2 1 Tomas BUSTAMANTE , Benjamin BAISER , James D. ELLIS 1Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA 2Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Received 28 June 2018 – Revised 11 February 2019 – Accepted 26 April 2019 Abstract – There are two endemic subspecies of western honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) in the Republic of South Africa (RSA), A.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidade Federal De São Carlos Centro De Ciências Biológicas E Da Saúde Programa De Pós Graduação Em Genética Evolutiva E Biologia Molecular
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SÃO CARLOS CENTRO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS E DA SAÚDE PROGRAMA DE PÓS GRADUAÇÃO EM GENÉTICA EVOLUTIVA E BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR O desvio reprodutivo se correlaciona positivamente com o parentesco genético e o sistema de acasalamento? Euglossa cordata (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Euglossini) como Estudo de Caso. Gabriele Antico Freiria São Carlos – SP 2015 i Gabriele Antico Freiria O desvio reprodutivo se correlaciona positivamente com o parentesco genético e o sistema de acasalamento? Euglossa cordata (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Euglossini) como Estudo de Caso. Tese de Doutorado apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética Evolutiva e Biologia Molecular do Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde da Universidade Federal de São Carlos, como parte dos requisitos para a obtenção do título de Doutor em Ciências, Área de Concentração: Genética e Evolução. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Marco Antonio Del Lama Coorientador: Prof. Dr. Carlos Alberto Garófalo São Carlos – SP 2015 Ficha catalográfica elaborada pelo DePT da Biblioteca Comunitária/UFSCar Freiria, Gabriele Antico. F866dr O desvio reprodutivo se correlaciona positivamente com o parentesco genético e o sistema de acasalamento? Euglossa cordata (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Euglossini) como estudo de caso / Gabriele Antico Freiria. -- São Carlos : UFSCar, 2015. 110 f. Tese (Doutorado) -- Universidade Federal de São Carlos, 2015. 1. Abelha. 2. Reprodução. 3. Euglossini. 4. Euglossa cordata. 5. Microssatélites. 6. Parentesco. I. Título. CDD: 595.799 (20a) ii Em memória da minha avó, Rita Baioco Antico. Por ter me mostrado com a sua história, sempre em minha memória, o peso e a importância de algumas oportunidades. iii “O mundo não é, ele está sendo.” (Paulo Freire) iv AGRADECIMENTOS Ao meu orientador, Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2012/141754 A2 18 October 2012 (18.10.2012) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2012/141754 A2 18 October 2012 (18.10.2012) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: Not classified CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, (21) International Application Number: HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, KR, PCT/US201 1/067150 KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, (22) International Filing Date: MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, 23 December 201 1 (23. 12.201 1) OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, (25) Filing Language: English TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (26) Publication Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (30) Priority Data: kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, 61/428,1 18 29 December 2010 (29. 12.2010) US GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US) : DOW TJ, TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, AGROSCIENCES LLC [US/US]; 9330 Zionsville Road, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, Indianapolis, Indiana 46268 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • An Abstract of the Thesis Of
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Sarah A. Maxfield-Taylor for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology presented on March 26, 2014. Title: Natural Enemies of Native Bumble Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Western Oregon Abstract approved: _____________________________________________ Sujaya U. Rao Bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) are important native pollinators in wild and agricultural systems, and are one of the few groups of native bees commercially bred for use in the pollination of a range of crops. In recent years, declines in bumble bees have been reported globally. One factor implicated in these declines, believed to affect bumble bee colonies in the wild and during rearing, is natural enemies. A diversity of fungi, protozoa, nematodes, and parasitoids has been reported to affect bumble bees, to varying extents, in different parts of the world. In contrast to reports of decline elsewhere, bumble bees have been thriving in Oregon on the West Coast of the U.S.A.. In particular, the agriculturally rich Willamette Valley in the western part of the state appears to be fostering several species. Little is known, however, about the natural enemies of bumble bees in this region. The objectives of this thesis were to: (1) identify pathogens and parasites in (a) bumble bees from the wild, and (b) bumble bees reared in captivity and (2) examine the effects of disease on bee hosts. Bumble bee queens and workers were collected from diverse locations in the Willamette Valley, in spring and summer. Bombus mixtus, Bombus nevadensis, and Bombus vosnesenskii collected from the wild were dissected and examined for pathogens and parasites, and these organisms were identified using morphological and molecular characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybridization in East African Swarm-Raiding Army Ants Kronauer Et Al
    Hybridization in East African swarm-raiding army ants Kronauer et al. Kronauer et al. Frontiers in Zoology 2011, 8:20 http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/8/1/20 (22 August 2011) Kronauer et al. Frontiers in Zoology 2011, 8:20 http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/8/1/20 RESEARCH Open Access Hybridization in East African swarm-raiding army ants Daniel JC Kronauer1,2*†, Marcell K Peters3,4†, Caspar Schöning1,5 and Jacobus J Boomsma1 Abstract Background: Hybridization can have complex effects on evolutionary dynamics in ants because of the combination of haplodiploid sex-determination and eusociality. While hybrid non-reproductive workers have been found in a range of species, examples of gene-flow via hybrid queens and males are rare. We studied hybridization in East African army ants (Dorylus subgenus Anomma) using morphology, mitochondrial DNA sequences, and nuclear microsatellites. Results: While the mitochondrial phylogeny had a strong geographic signal, different species were not recovered as monophyletic. At our main study site at Kakamega Forest, a mitochondrial haplotype was shared between a “Dorylus molestus-like” and a “Dorylus wilverthi-like” form. This pattern is best explained by introgression following hybridization between D. molestus and D. wilverthi. Microsatellite data from workers showed that the two morphological forms correspond to two distinct genetic clusters, with a significant proportion of individuals being classified as hybrids. Conclusions: We conclude that hybridization and gene-flow between the two army ant species D. molestus and D. wilverthi has occurred, and that mating between the two forms continues to regularly produce hybrid workers. Hybridization is particularly surprising in army ants because workers have control over which males are allowed to mate with a young virgin queen inside the colony.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasite Interactions in Urban Gardens
    Environmental Entomology, XX(X), 2017, 1–9 doi: 10.1093/ee/nvx155 Research Pollinator Ecology and Management Vegetation Management and Host Density Influence Bee– Parasite Interactions in Urban Gardens Hamutahl Cohen,1,2,3 Robyn D. Quistberg,1 and Stacy M. Philpott1 1Environmental Studies Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, 2Environmental Studies Department, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, and 3Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Subject Editor: Gloria DeGrandi-Hoffman Received 17 April 2017; Editorial decision 28 August 2017 Abstract Apocephalus borealis phorid flies, a parasitoid of bumble bees and yellow jacket wasps in North America, was recently reported as a novel parasitoid of the honey bee Apis mellifera Linnaeus (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Little is known about the ecology of this interaction, including phorid fecundity on bee hosts, whether phorid-bee parasitism is density dependent, and which local habitat and landscape features may correlate with changes in parasitism rates for either bumble or honey bees. We examined the impact of local and landscape drivers and host abundance on phorid parasitism of A. mellifera and the bumble bee Bombus vosnesenskii Radoszkowski (Hymenoptera: Apidae). We worked in 19 urban gardens along the North-Central Coast of California, where phorid parasitism of honey bees was first reported in 2012. We collected and incubated bees for phorid emergence, and surveyed local vegetation, ground cover, and floral characteristics as well as land cover types surrounding gardens. We found that phorid parasitism was higher on bumble bees than on honey bees, and phorids produced nearly twice as many pupae on individual bumble bee hosts than on honey bee hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybridization in Ants
    Rockefeller University Digital Commons @ RU Student Theses and Dissertations 2020 Hybridization in Ants Ian Butler Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.rockefeller.edu/ student_theses_and_dissertations Part of the Life Sciences Commons HYBRIDIZATION IN ANTS A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of The Rockefeller University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Ian Butler June 2020 © Copyright by Ian Butler 2020 HYBRIDIZATION IN ANTS Ian Butler, Ph.D. The Rockefeller University 2020 Interspecific hybridization is a relatively common occurrence within all animal groups. Two main factors make hybridization act differently in ants than in other species: eusociality and haplodiploidy. These factors serve to reduce the costs of interspecific hybridization in ants while simultaneously allowing them to take advantage of certain benefits. Eusociality may mitigate the effects of hybridization by allowing hybrids to be shunted into the worker caste, potentially reducing the effects of hybrid sterility. In haplodiploid species, males do not have a father. They instead develop from unfertilized eggs as haploid clones of their mother. This means that interspecifically mated queens do not completely sacrifice reproductive potential even if all hybrids are sterile because they can still produce fertile males. These factors in turn suggest that hybridization should be more common among the social Hymenoptera than other animal groups. Nevertheless, current data suggest that ants hybridize at rates similar to other animal groups, although these data are limited. Furthermore, there is a large amount of overlap between cases of interspecific hybridization and cases of genetic caste determination. A majority of the cases in ants where caste is determined primarily by genotype are associated with hybridization.
    [Show full text]