DOCSLIB.ORG

Analysing the Voting Patterns of the Senate of the 45Th Australian Parliament Via Fully-Visible Boltzmann Machines Jessica Bagnall, Andrew Jones, Hien Nguyen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analysing the Voting Patterns of the Senate of the 45Th Australian Parliament Via Fully-Visible Boltzmann Machines Jessica Bagnall, Andrew Jones, Hien Nguyen Analysing the voting patterns of the Senate of the 45th Australian Parliament via fully-visible Boltzmann machines Jessica Bagnall, Andrew Jones, Hien Nguyen To cite this version: Jessica Bagnall, Andrew Jones, Hien Nguyen. Analysing the voting patterns of the Senate of the 45th Australian Parliament via fully-visible Boltzmann machines. useR! 2018, Jul 2018, Brisbane, Australia. hal-01838443 HAL Id: hal-01838443 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01838443 Submitted on 13 Jul 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Change Color Theme: Analysing the voting patterns of the Senate of the 45th Australian Parliament via fully-visible Boltzmann machines This template is designed to use the built-in color themes in the newer versions of PowerPoint. Jessica Bagnall1; Dr. Andrew Jones2; Dr. Hien Nguyen1, 1Department of Mathematics & Statistics, La Trobe University, Melbourne, 2School of Mathematics & Physics, University of Queensland, Brisbane To change the color theme, select the Design tab, then select the Colors drop-down list. Method Introduction Figure 1. A network plot of the AG Our data was retrieved from the Australian Senate website, available at https://www.aph.gov.au/. The timeframe chosen for this relationships between each party’s voting In the election of the 45th Australian Senate, 20 of the 76 Senators elected were from minor parties (the Australian Greens, NXT Nick Xenophon Team, Jacqui Lambie Network, Pauline Hanson’s One Nation, Liberal Democrats Party, Derryn Hinch’s analysis began from the first vote of the 45th Australian Senate, until the parliamentary eligibility crisis beginning on July 14th, patterns. A red line indicates a negative 20174. Our reason for selecting this period in particular is that it contains the largest crossbench since the expansion of the Senate relationship, and a blue line indicates a Justice Party, and Family First Party), or were elected as independent Senators (Rod Culleton and Lucy Gichuhi). As such, 5 this is a particularly interesting and dynamic voting period to analyse, as there is a great deal of complexity regarding the in 1950 and that it was a period of relative stability of the Senate composition. positive relationship. A solid line indicates numerous ideological and interacting stances of arising from the crossbench. a significant relationship, and a dashed line FFP Due to the rules of Senate proceedings, the nature of the votes on parliamentary matters are only delivered at the party level—as indicates an non-significant insignificant. The Australian Senate is one of the two houses that compose the Australian Federal Parliament. The Senate shares the such, only party level data is officially made available. The thicker the line, the greater the power to make laws with the House of Representatives, and all proposed federal bills must be passed by the Senate and Each party within the Senate was assessed on their propensity to vote alongside the incumbent LNP government. We used this concordance/discordance. DHJP House of Representatives1. As such, the Senate has great influence over federal law-making. Despite this power over law measure to determine whether the party was left- (voting against the right-wing government) or right-wing (voting with the right-wing making, very little research has been conducted on how parties vote in the Senate. Moreover, to the bet of our knowledge, no government). significant research has been conducted that uses the rich amount of information from the large number of crossbenchers of the 45th Australian Senate. As such, we seek to conduct a proof-of-concept study by analysing the voting patterns of the 45th Our analyses were performed via our R package BoltzMM—The package implements the MM algorithm for maximum pseudolikelihood estimation of FVBM models, as presented in Nguyen and Wood6, and uses the asymptotic normality results of Australian Senate via the use of a fully-visible Boltzmann machine, implemented via the BoltzMM R package. This allows us JLN 7 to estimate the relative ideological positions of each individual senate party relative to the incumbent Liberal National Party Nguyen and Wood to conduct inferential computations. based on their voting data, as well as the association and interaction between each pair of parties. Results In the United States of America, similar research has been conducted on the voting patterns of the Supreme Court2. In the PHON Firstly, we estimated each party’s place on the left-to-right wing ideological spectrum, measured by their propensity to vote with or cited study, the authors used a Boltzmann Machine to estimate the ideological positions of each Supreme Court Justice. Their against the incumbent, right-wing LNP government. At the 0.05 significance level, four parties were found to vote in a manner that results found that there were significant interdependences between the voting patterns of the Justices and also that the could be viewed as significantly left- or right-leaning. Justices each had significant political biases along the left-to-right wing political spectrum. The default color theme for this template is “Office”, so you can always return to that after 3 Asymptotic Z-tests revealed a significant negative bias between the pattern of the Australian Greens and that of the government IND Martin & Quinn also sought to explain the voting patterns of Supreme Court Justices in the United States, and the extent to was found (-0.96). A significant negative bias was also found between the Jacqui Lambie Network and the LNP government (-0.58). trying some of the alternatives. which the ideological points of shifted for each justice during their careers (1953-1999). In this case, the authors found that the The Family First Network voting patterns were also negatively bias with the LNP government (-0.34). In terms of positive biases, the ALP justices did not have consistent ideologies or voting patterns throughout their career, and that their ideological points shifted Derryn Hinch Justice Party was found to significantly correlate with the voting patterns of the LNP (.71). See Table 1 for non- over time. significant figures. Biases coefficients are reported in parentheses. LDP Printing Your Poster: For our analyses, we first examined the voting patterns of each party in contrast to the right-wing LNP government in order to Asymptotic Z-tests revealed significant relationships between many pairs parties. These relationships are visualised in Figure 1. place them on the ideological left-to-right wing spectrum. Secondly, we examined the pairwise relationships between each of Once your poster file is ready, visit www.genigraphics.com to order a high-quality, Most notably, the largest concordances were found between the independent Senators and the Nick Xenophon Team, the the Senate parties. independent Senators and the Pauline Hanson One Nation Party, and the Nick Xenophon Team and Pauline Hanson One Nation affordable poster print. Every order receives a free design review and we can delivery as fast Party. Alongside these, large concordances were found between the Jacqui Lambie Network and Pauline Hanson One Nation Part, and the Derryn Hinch’s Justice Party and Nick Xenophon Team. The BoltzMM Package as next business day within the US and Canada. The Fully Visible Boltzmann Machine In terms of discordances, there were notable significant relationships between the Australian Greens and the Pauline Hanson One The BoltzMM package is available on CRAN and can be installed via the command: A fully-visible Boltzmann machine is a probability model that takes a random binary ‘spin’ variable ! ∈ −1, +1 ' as input, Genigraphics® has been producing output from PowerPoint® longer than anyone in the Nation Party, the Liberal Democrats Party and the Australian Labor Party, and the Australian Labor Party and the independent > install.packages('BoltzMM') where ( is the dimensionality of the vector. The probability assigned to each possible realization ) of ! is given by: Senators. industry; dating back to when we helped Microsoft® design the PowerPoint software. Pr ! = ) = -./ 0, 1 exp()6 1)/2 + 06)), The BoltzMM package allows for computation of probability mass functions of fully-visible Boltzmann machines via the functions: pfvbm and allpfvbm. Random data can be generated using the function: rfvbm. Maximum pseudolikelihood estimation of parameters via the MM 6 6 Discussion and - 0, 1 = ∑;∈ ./,</ = exp(; 1;/2 + 0 ;). algorithm can be conducted using the function: fitfvbm. Computation of partial derivatives and Hessians can be performed via the functions: Analyses revealed an interesting pattern of voting behaviours amongst parties. Firstly the Australian Greens, Jacqui Lambie fvbmpartiald and fvbmHessian. Covariance estimates and normal standard errors can be computed using the functions: fvbmcov and US and Canada: 1-800-790-4001 The parameters of the model are the ‘bias’ vector and the ‘relationship’ matrix. The bias vector is (-dimensional and the Network, and Family First Party voted significantly in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • QLD Senate Results Report 2017
    Statement of Results Report Event: 2016 Federal Election - Full Senate Ballot: 2016 Federal Election - Full Senate Order Elected Candidates Elected Group Name 1 George BRANDIS Liberal National Party of Queensland 2 Murray WATT Australian Labor Party 3 Pauline HANSON Pauline Hanson's One Nation 4 Matthew CANAVAN Liberal National Party of Queensland 5 Anthony CHISHOLM Australian Labor Party 6 James McGRATH Liberal National Party of Queensland 7 Claire MOORE Australian Labor Party 8 Ian MACDONALD Liberal National Party of Queensland 9 Andrew BARTLETT The Greens 10 Barry O'SULLIVAN Liberal National Party of Queensland 11 Chris KETTER Australian Labor Party 12 Fraser ANNING Pauline Hanson's One Nation Senate 06 Nov 2017 11:50:21 Page 1 of 5 Statement of Results Report Event: 2016 Federal Election - Full Senate Ballot: 2016 Federal Election - Full Senate Order Excluded Candidates Excluded Group Name 1 Single Exclusion Craig GUNNIS Palmer United Party 2 Single Exclusion Ian EUGARDE 3 Single Exclusion Ludy Charles SWEERIS-SIGRIST Christian Democratic Party (Fred Nile Group) 4 Single Exclusion Terry JORGENSEN 5 Single Exclusion Reece FLOWERS VOTEFLUX.ORG | Upgrade Democracy! 6 Single Exclusion Gary James PEAD 7 Single Exclusion Stephen HARDING Citizens Electoral Council 8 Single Exclusion Erin COOKE Socialist Equality Party 9 Single Exclusion Neroli MOONEY Rise Up Australia Party 10 Single Exclusion David BUNDY 11 Single Exclusion John GIBSON 12 Single Exclusion Chelle DOBSON Australian Liberty Alliance 13 Single Exclusion Annette LOURIGAN Glenn
    [Show full text]
  • Citizenship Saga
    THE CITIZENSHIP SAGA Malcolm Turnbull and Barnaby Joyce on the night of Joyce's by-election win, 2 December 2017. | AAP Image THE CITIZENSHIP SAGA R have been elected as a consequence of failing to take ‘all steps that are reasonably required’ to renounce their MORGAN BEGG Research Fellow at the foreign citizenships. CITIZENSHIP Institute of Public Affairs The Constitutional provision in question, section 44(i), disqualifies from federal parliament any ne of the more person who: consequential political is under any acknowledgement stories that dominated of allegiance, obedience, or Oheadlines in 2017 was adherence to a foreign power, or is the prolonged dual citizenship a subject or a citizen or entitled to crisis upending the Commonwealth the rights or privileges of a subject parliament. The complete paralysis or a citizen of a foreign power. that has resulted is nothing short of The requirement that those who a humiliating scandal. However, the serve in parliament are free of foreign larger scandal is the High Court’s loyalties is entirely proper. However, excessively broad interpretation the High Court’s interpretation of of section 44 of the Australian foreign allegiance as established Constitution that has created this by the activist court under Chief debacle, rejecting the original Justice Anthony Mason in the 1992 intention of the founding fathers case of Sykes v Cleary is a departure in the process. It demonstrates the from common sense and sound need for conservatives to revive the constitutional philosophy. doctrine of constitutional originalism. It all began in 2011, when Perth- THE DANGER OF based lawyer John Cameron dug into LITERALISM IS THAT the citizenship details of then Prime > THE MEANINGS OF Minister Julia Gillard and opposition WORDS CHANGE OVER leader Tony Abbott.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia Muslim Advocacy Network
    1. The Australian Muslim Advocacy Network (AMAN) welcomes the opportunity to input to the UN Special Rapporteur on the Freedom of Religion or Belief as he prepares this report on the Impact of Islamophobia/anti-Muslim hatred and discrimination on the right to freedom of thought, conscience religion or belief. 2. We also welcome the opportunity to participate in your Asia-Pacific Consultation and hear from the experiences of a variety of other Muslims organisations. 3. AMAN is a national body that works through law, policy, research and media, to secure the physical and psychological welfare of Australian Muslims. 4. Our objective to create conditions for the safe exercise of our faith and preservation of faith- based identity, both of which are under persistent pressure from vilification, discrimination and disinformation. 5. We are engaged in policy development across hate crime & vilification laws, online safety, disinformation and democracy. Through using a combination of media, law, research, and direct engagement with decision making parties such as government and digital platforms, we are in a constant process of generating and testing constructive proposals. We also test existing civil and criminal laws to push back against the mainstreaming of hate, and examine whether those laws are fit for purpose. Most recently, we are finalising significant research into how anti-Muslim dehumanising discourse operates on Facebook and Twitter, and the assessment framework that could be used to competently and consistently assess hate actors. A. Definitions What is your working definition of anti-Muslim hatred and/or Islamophobia? What are the advantages and potential pitfalls of such definitions? 6.
    [Show full text]
  • First Century Fox Inc and Sky Plc; European Intervention Notice
    Rt Hon Karen Bradley Secretary of State for Digital Culture Media and Sport July 14 2017 Dear Secretary of State Twenty-First Century Fox Inc and Sky plc; European Intervention Notice The Campaign for Press and Broadcasting is responding to your request for new submissions on the test of commitment to broadcasting standards. We are pleased to submit this short supplement to the submission we provided for Ofcom in March. As requested, the information is up-to-date, but we are adding an appeal to you to reconsider Ofcom’s recommendation to accept the 21CF bid on this ground, which we find wholly unconvincing in the light of the evidence we submitted. SKY NEWS IN AUSTRALIA In a pre-echo of the current buyout bid in the UK, Sky News Australia, previously jointly- owned with other media owners, became wholly owned by the Murdochs on December 1 last year. When the CPBF made its submission on the Commitment to Broadcasting Standards EIN to Ofcom in March there were three months of operation by which to judge the direction of the channel, but now there are three months more. A number of commentaries have been published. The Murdoch entity that controls Sky Australia is News Corporation rather than 21FC but the service is clearly following the Fox formula about which the CPBF commented to Ofcom. Indeed it is taking the model of broadcasting high-octane right-wing political commentary in peak viewing times even further. While Fox News has three continuous hours of talk shows on weekday evenings, Sky News Australia has five.
    [Show full text]
  • HON. GIZ WATSON B. 1957
    PARLIAMENTARY HISTORY ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA TRANSCRIPT OF AN INTERVIEW WITH HON. GIZ WATSON b. 1957 - STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA - ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION DATE OF INTERVIEW: 2015-2016 INTERVIEWER: ANNE YARDLEY TRANSCRIBER: ANNE YARDLEY DURATION: 19 HOURS REFERENCE NUMBER: OH4275 COPYRIGHT: PARLIAMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA. GIZ WATSON INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPTS NOTE TO READER Readers of this oral history memoir should bear in mind that it is a verbatim transcript of the spoken word and reflects the informal, conversational style that is inherent in such historical sources. The Parliament and the State Library are not responsible for the factual accuracy of the memoir, nor for the views expressed therein; these are for the reader to judge. Bold type face indicates a difference between transcript and recording, as a result of corrections made to the transcript only, usually at the request of the person interviewed. FULL CAPITALS in the text indicate a word or words emphasised by the person interviewed. Square brackets [ ] are used for insertions not in the original tape. ii GIZ WATSON INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPTS CONTENTS Contents Pages Introduction 1 Interview - 1 4 - 22 Parents, family life and childhood; migrating from England; school and university studies – Penrhos/ Murdoch University; religion – Quakerism, Buddhism; countryside holidays and early appreciation of Australian environment; Anti-Vietnam marches; civil-rights movements; Activism; civil disobedience; sport; studying environmental science; Albany; studying for a trade. Interview - 2 23 - 38 Environmental issues; Campaign to Save Native Forests; non-violent Direct Action; Quakerism; Alcoa; community support and debate; Cockburn Cement; State Agreement Acts; campaign results; legitimacy of activism; “eco- warriors”; Inaugural speech .
    [Show full text]
  • Select Committee Into the Political Influence of Donations
    The Senate Select Committee into the Political Influence of Donations Political Influence of Donations © Commonwealth of Australia 2018 ISBN 978-1-76010-745-1 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/. Contents List of Recommendations .................................................................................................................. v Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................... ix Members .............................................................................................................................................. xi Chapter 1—Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Conduct of the inquiry ........................................................................................................................ 1 Structure of the report ......................................................................................................................... 2 Legislative definitions ......................................................................................................................... 2 Current federal regulation .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Balance of Power Senate Projections, Spring 2018
    Balance of power Senate projections, Spring 2018 The Australia Institute conducts a quarterly poll of Senate voting intention. Our analysis shows that major parties should expect the crossbench to remain large and diverse for the foreseeable future. Senate projections series, no. 2 Bill Browne November 2018 ABOUT THE AUSTRALIA INSTITUTE The Australia Institute is an independent public policy think tank based in Canberra. It is funded by donations from philanthropic trusts and individuals and commissioned research. We barrack for ideas, not political parties or candidates. Since its launch in 1994, the Institute has carried out highly influential research on a broad range of economic, social and environmental issues. OUR PHILOSOPHY As we begin the 21st century, new dilemmas confront our society and our planet. Unprecedented levels of consumption co-exist with extreme poverty. Through new technology we are more connected than we have ever been, yet civic engagement is declining. Environmental neglect continues despite heightened ecological awareness. A better balance is urgently needed. The Australia Institute’s directors, staff and supporters represent a broad range of views and priorities. What unites us is a belief that through a combination of research and creativity we can promote new solutions and ways of thinking. OUR PURPOSE – ‘RESEARCH THAT MATTERS’ The Institute publishes research that contributes to a more just, sustainable and peaceful society. Our goal is to gather, interpret and communicate evidence in order to both diagnose the problems we face and propose new solutions to tackle them. The Institute is wholly independent and not affiliated with any other organisation. Donations to its Research Fund are tax deductible for the donor.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing the Dynamics of Party Leadership Survival in Britain and Australia: Brown, Rudd and Gillard
    This is a repository copy of Comparing the dynamics of party leadership survival in Britain and Australia: Brown, Rudd and Gillard. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/82697/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Heppell, T and Bennister, M (2015) Comparing the dynamics of party leadership survival in Britain and Australia: Brown, Rudd and Gillard. Government and Opposition, FirstV. 1 - 26. ISSN 1477-7053 https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2014.31 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Comparing the Dynamics of Party Leadership Survival in Britain and Australia: Brown, Rudd and Gillard Abstract This article examines the interaction between the respective party structures of the Australian Labor Party and the British Labour Party as a means of assessing the strategic options facing aspiring challengers for the party leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • The Charter and Constitution of the Australian Greens May 2020 Charter
    The Charter and Constitution of the Australian Greens May 2020 Charter .......................................................................................................................................................................3 Basis of The Charter ..............................................................................................................................................3 Ecology ..................................................................................................................................................................3 Democracy.............................................................................................................................................................3 Social Justice .........................................................................................................................................................3 Peace ....................................................................................................................................................................3 An Ecologically Sustainable Economy ....................................................................................................................4 Meaningful Work ....................................................................................................................................................4 Culture ...................................................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Which Political Parties Are Standing up for Animals?
    Which political parties are standing up for animals? Has a formal animal Supports Independent Supports end to welfare policy? Office of Animal Welfare? live export? Australian Labor Party (ALP) YES YES1 NO Coalition (Liberal Party & National Party) NO2 NO NO The Australian Greens YES YES YES Animal Justice Party (AJP) YES YES YES Australian Sex Party YES YES YES Health Australia Party YES YES YES Science Party YES YES YES3 Pirate Party Australia YES YES NO4 Derryn Hinch’s Justice Party YES No policy YES Sustainable Australia YES No policy YES 1Labor recently announced it would establish an Independent Office of Animal Welfare if elected, however its struc- ture is still unclear. Benefits for animals would depend on how the policy was executed and whether the Office is independent of the Department of Agriculture in its operations and decision-making. Australian Democrats YES No policy No policy 2The Coalition has no formal animal welfare policy, but since first publication of this table they have announced a plan to ban the sale of new cosmetics tested on animals. Nick Xenophon Team (NXT) NO No policy NO5 3The Science Party's policy states "We believe the heavily documented accounts of animal suffering justify an end to the current system of live export, and necessitate substantive changes if it is to continue." Australian Independents Party NO No policy No policy 4Pirate Party Australia policy is to “Enact a package of reforms to transform and improve the live exports industry”, including “Provid[ing] assistance for willing live animal exporters to shift to chilled/frozen meat exports.” 6 Family First NO No policy No policy 5Nick Xenophon Team’s policy on live export is ‘It is important that strict controls are placed on live animal exports to ensure animals are treated in accordance with Australian animal welfare standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Prime Ministers of Australia
    Prime Ministers of Australia No. Prime Minister Term of office Party 1. Edmund Barton 1.1.1901 – 24.9.1903 Protectionist Party 2. Alfred Deakin (1st time) 24.9.1903 – 27.4.1904 Protectionist Party 3. John Christian Watson 27.4.1904 – 18.8.1904 Australian Labor Party 4. George Houstoun Reid 18.8.1904 – 5.7.1905 Free Trade Party - Alfred Deakin (2nd time) 5.7.1905 – 13.11.1908 Protectionist Party 5. Andrew Fisher (1st time) 13.11.1908 – 2.6.1909 Australian Labor Party - Alfred Deakin (3rd time) 2.6.1909 – 29.4.1910 Commonwealth Liberal Party - Andrew Fisher (2nd time) 29.4.1910 – 24.6.1913 Australian Labor Party 6. Joseph Cook 24.6.1913 – 17.9.1914 Commonwealth Liberal Party - Andrew Fisher (3rd time) 17.9.1914 – 27.10.1915 Australian Labor Party 7. William Morris Hughes 27.10.1915 – 9.2.1923 Australian Labor Party (to 1916); National Labor Party (1916-17); Nationalist Party (1917-23) 8. Stanley Melbourne Bruce 9.2.1923 – 22.10.1929 Nationalist Party 9. James Henry Scullin 22.10.1929 – 6.1.1932 Australian Labor Party 10. Joseph Aloysius Lyons 6.1.1932 – 7.4.1939 United Australia Party 11. Earle Christmas Grafton Page 7.4.1939 – 26.4.1939 Country Party 12. Robert Gordon Menzies 26.4.1939 – 29.8.1941 United Australia Party (1st time) 13. Arthur William Fadden 29.8.1941 – 7.10.1941 Country Party 14. John Joseph Ambrose Curtin 7.10.1941 – 5.7.1945 Australian Labor Party 15. Francis Michael Forde 6.7.1945 – 13.7.1945 Australian Labor Party 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Reform of the Australian Labor Party April 2014 on 22 April, Opposition
    Reform of the Australian Labor Party April 2014 On 22 April, Opposition Leader the Hon Bill Shorten MP announced reforms aimed at renewing and modernising the Australian Labor Party. Mr Shorten is the first directly-elected Leader of the Federal Parliamentary Labor Party. He was elected under changes implemented under former Prime Minister the Hon Kevin Rudd. The Hawker Britton Occasional Paper on the election of the Federal Labor Leader is available here. The Hawker Britton Occasional Paper on changes implemented by former Prime Minister Rudd to the way Federal Labor leaders are elected is available here. Mr Shorten’s speech is available here. Some of these measures will be directly implemented by the National Secretary. Due to the federal structure of the Australian Labor Party, others will require the cooperation or need to be implemented directly by State and Territory branches themselves. Changes to the ALP membership process Mr Shorten has set a target of 100 000 members. To reach this target, Mr Shorten announced the following measures: a new ‘one-click’ national online joining model for new members to start from July 2014; the establishment of low cost, uniform national membership fees; and the removal of the requirement that prospective members of the Labor party must also join a union. Changes to ALP candidate selection Mr Shorten also called for an overhaul of pre-selection processes, and called for a greater role for the ALP membership in candidate selection at Federal, State and Territory levels. Labor Leader elections: For all Federal, State and Territory leaders to be elected using the 50:50 system similar to that used by Federal Labor in 2013.
    [Show full text]