1 Please Note: C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Please Note: C PLEASE NOTE: CONCURRENT TUTORIALS AND PLENARIES THROUGHOUT THE DAY DO NOT REQUIRE TICKETS MMMONDAY ,,, JJJUNE 292929 5:00 -- 7:30 PM FESTIVAL OPENS: (Welcome/Opening Session; Reception) 7:30 PM Why Copenhagen? What the science is telling uuss about how much we needneed to do about climate changechange,, and how fast (ticket not required) Assistant to the President for Science and Technology and Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, John Holdren explains the President’s energy and climate positions, and enunciates a sense of urgency regarding the completion of domestic climate-policy legislation prior to the upcoming UN Climate Conference in Copenhagen later this year. John Holdren Doerr Hosier Center Tickets are requirrequireded for the following events 7:30pm Creating Art Out of Reality: One Evening, One Ticket Aspen District Theatre Concert and Conversation with Peter Buffett The evening will begin with a concert and conversation with Peter Buffett, the Emmy Award-winning composer and musician. While Buffett has remained behind the scenes as a composer of jingles, movie soundtracks, and atmospheric sound collections for the majority of his career, he began experimenting with vocals and a more eclectic new wave sound in recent years. Buffett is a composer, storyteller, activist, and philanthropist, and his work crosses all formats and genres and grooves together. All of his work supports important causes, as he will share with the audience after his concert. A special evening is in store with Peter Buffett on the piano, joined by renowned cellist, Michael Kott. Peter Buffett Michael Kott Theatrical Performance and Discussion: SEVEN Introduction by Jane Harman SEVEN is a groundbreaking work of documentary theater that captures the remarkable lives of a diverse and courageous group of women leaders around the world. A collaboration by seven playwrights, the play is based on personal interviews with seven women in the Vital Voices Global Leadership Network who have triumphed over enormous obstacles to bring about major changes in their home countries. The lives of these women provide a portal through which audiences will be able to experience a diversity of cultures while bearing witness to the varied ways in which individual women have overcome seemingly insurmountable hurdles to justice, freedom, and equality. Panel Introduction by Alyse Nelson Marina Pisklakova Mu Sochua Moderator: Anna Deavere Smith 1 TTTUESDAY ,,, JJJUNE 303030 BREAKFAST SESSIONS: DARWIN ’S LEGACY WORLD AFFAIRS AND THE GLOBAL ECONOMY Books for Breakfast Series : BOOKS FOR BREAKFAST SERIES : Charles Darwin vs. Himself: David Smick: The World Is Curved: Hidden Dangers to The Secret Life of a Reluctant Revolutionary the Global Economy How did Darwin navigate the tension between his very Described by New York Times columnist David Brooks private character and very public work life? Especially as “astonishingly prescient,” David Smick’s The World instructive is the tension between Darwin’s caution Is Curved picks up where Thomas Friedman’s The and his honesty: Darwin was a cautious man by World Is Flat left off. Smick describes the underside of nature, shy and reclusive, but also ferociously honest globalization, and the financial dangers looming just in the intellectual, philosophical, and scientific arenas. over the horizon. He argues that the economic model It made him miserable—and it made him heroic. under which the world has been operating has crash- David Quammen landed – and it’s time for a new financial doctrine for the twenty-first century. David Smick Jerome Hotel Ballroom 12:00pm – 1:00pm LUNCH DISCUSSIONS : THE MEDIA CRACK -UP JUSTICE AND SOCIETY Why I Blog Human Rights and Civil Society Two of the Web’s most widely read bloggers reveal Independent civil society groups are at the front lines what draws them to the craft, how it is different from of change in their own societies. But in many places previous writing formats, the unique payoffs and perils where they are needed most, they face intimidation by of the blogosphere, and how it is evolving. government and private actors intent on preserving Ta’NTa’Neeeehhhhiiiisisi Coates the status quo. How do advocates for human rights Andrew Sullivan operate in these challenging environments? Human Rights First leader Elisa Massimino discusses these issues with Mu Sochua, Cambodia’s minister of women’s affairs, and Marina Pisklakova, an activist in Russia hell-bent on offering a better life to women who suffer at the hands of their husbands (one in four); both of these valiant leaders share a commitment to combating human-trafficking in their respective countries and to raising global awareness. Marina Pisklakova Mu Sochua Moderator: Elisa Massimino Hotel Jerome Ballroom 2 INSPIRED ENTREPRENEURSHIP MANAGING PLANET EARTH What Do I Do? Spirited Ideas that Will Change the Strategic Pillars of Future Mobility World How do we innovate in a downsized economy? A top Kickstart uses innovative tools, technology, and the engineer explains why we can’t stop now: the market to develop a cost-effective and sustainable technologies that mass consumers have come to way to help families lift themselves out of poverty. expect begin at the high end of the market. A Peter Buffett and Akon collaborate on music to inspire fascinating and rare interview with an automotive people to take action and make a difference. The I leader who describes why luxury vehicles do more Live Here Foundation tells stories from the unheard than serve the very rich: they drive critical innovations and silenced victims of violence and trafficking around in safety, fuel economy, and sustainability. the world. The founders of these incredible Bharat Balasubramanian organizations discuss their work and ideas. Interviewer: Csaba Csere Martin Fisher Peter Buffett Mia Kirshner Moderator: Jane Wales EVENING EXCHANGES AND EVENTS : 8:00pm Film Screening and Discussion: Food, IncInc.... How much do we really know about the food we buy at our local supermarkets and serve to our families? In Food, Inc. , filmmaker Robert Kenner lifts the veil on our nation’s food industry, exposing the highly mechanized underbelly that has been hidden from the American consumer with the consent of our government’s regulatory agencies. Robert Kenner Moderator: CorbCorbyy Kummer Paepcke Auditorium 8:30pm THE MEDIA CRACK -UP What’s the News Worth to You? Where do YOU get your news? Do you pay for it? Take it for granted? Read the paper? Watch a screen? For those trying to understand the news consumer, it’s the dawn of a new era. What business models will save — or replace — advertising-driven newspapers, magazines, the nightly news and other time-honored systems? Who will you trust to deliver accurate information about our world — and how much would you pay for it? Top executives at ABC, TIME , the Washington Post , and Bloomberg will consider what they know about today’s and tomorrow’s news consumers, plus the challenges and opportunities they all face. David Westin, Katherine Weymouth, Norman Pearlstine,Pearlstine, Josh TyrangieTyrangiel,l, Steven Brill Moderator: Walter Isaacson Hotel Jerome Ballroom 8:30pm LIFE IN AMERICA Obama and the Challenge of Expectations: A Look at the President’s First Six Months Political experts and insiders weigh in — and ask what you think. Margaret Carlson Charles Ogletree Linda Wertheimer Fred Wertheimer Moderator: Ron Brownstein Doerr Hosier Center, McNulty Room 3 WWWEDNESDAY ,,, JJJULY 111 7:45am – 8:45am BREAKFAST SESSIONS: DARWIN ’S LEGACY Books for Breakfast Series: LIVING DIGITALLY Evolution in EEverydverydverydayay Life The Founding Fathers of Blogging Discuss the End of David Mindell will discuss the many applications of Media evolution to our everyday lives. Knowledge of evolution Mahalo.com and Gawker Media leaders discuss the is applied in the domestication of wild species for blogosphere and its impact on the traditional press. agriculture, in managing our exposure to pathogens Jason Calacanis and the severity of epidemics, in promoting individual Nick Denton health, in fostering the diversity of species that Moderator: Jeff Jarvis safeguard functional ecosystems, in pursuing justice within the legal system, and in promoting scientific discovery through education and research. The understanding and application of evolutionary science has become indispensable in modern society. David Mindell WORLD AFFAIRS THE GLOBAL ECONOMY JUSTICE AND SOCIETY The Ascent of Finance … and the Descent of The Constitution in 2020 Democracy? What will be the great constitutional questions during Historian Niall Ferguson draws on his recent best- the next decade? Where is our Constitution going and seller, The Ascent of Money , to set the current where should it go? Yale Law Professor Jack Balkin financial crisis in long-run perspective. Just what will talks about the future of the Supreme Court and the political—and geopolitical—consequences of the interpreting the Constitution in the age of Obama. crisis be around the world? Past crises, like the University of Texas Professor Sandy Levinson asks Depression, weakened democracy. Could this one what’s broken with our system and what needs fixing. have similar effects, destabilizing new democracies in Jack Balkin Eastern Europe, destroying respect for Parliament in Sandy Levinson Britain, and propelling Communist China into a new Limelight Lodge position of economic parity with the United States? Niall Ferguson Hotel Jerome Ballroom 12:00pm – 1:00pm LUNCH DISCUSSIONS : JUSTICE AND SOCIETY SCIENCE OF BEING HUMAN Markets and Morals The Lucifer Effect What are the moral limits of markets? Michael Sandel How does evil give birth to heroism by ordinary will preview his forthcoming public television series, people? Learn about a new conception of the heroic “Justice,” with a lively lunchtime session on the moral imagination that democratizes, demystifies, and fall-out of the financial crisis. diversifies heroism in Phil Zimbardo’s exploration of Michael Sandel scenarios like good people immersed in evil situations and saving the soul of the nation by creating hero-in- waiting youth ensembles.
Recommended publications
  • The Ten Commandments 2.0 ADAM J
    Luther Seminary Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary Faculty Publications Faculty & Staff choS larship Summer 2012 The eT n Commandments 2.0 Adam J. Copeland Luther Seminary, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/faculty_articles Part of the Ethics in Religion Commons, and the Practical Theology Commons Recommended Citation Copeland, Adam J., "The eT n Commandments 2.0" (2012). Faculty Publications. 61. http://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/faculty_articles/61 Published Citation Copeland, Adam J. “The eT n Commandments 2.0.” Word & World 32, no. 3 (2012): 217–226. https://luthersem.idm.oclc.org/ login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rfh&AN=ATLA0001904931&site=ehost-live&scope=site. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty & Staff choS larship at Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Word & World Volume 32, Number 3 Summer 2012 The Ten Commandments 2.0 ADAM J. COPELAND he questions have changed. A few years ago, tech-savvy pastors advocating for Tthe use of new media in ministry were asked questions from other church leaders like, “How does Twitter work?” “Is Facebook just for college students?” “What is a blog?” Answers to these practical questions came relatively easily through how-to lessons and straightforward seminars. More recently, inquiries about technology and ministry have shifted from these basic how-to questions to more complex ones having to do with theology, ethics, and the shadow side of technology.
    [Show full text]
  • A Postmortem on the Midterm Elections CLE Materials Packet
    Democratic Distortions: A Postmortem on the Midterm Elections CLE Materials Packet Wednesday, November 14 9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Democracy’s Deficits Samuel Issacharoff† Barely a quarter century after the collapse of the Soviet empire, democracy has entered an intense period of public scrutiny. The election of President Donald Trump and the Brexit vote are dramatic moments in a populist uprising against the post- war political consensus of liberal rule. But they are also signposts in a process long in the making, yet perhaps not fully appreciated until the intense electoral upheavals of recent years. The current moment is defined by distrust of the institutional order of democracy and, more fundamentally, of the idea that there is a tomorrow and that the losers of today may unseat the victors in a new round of electoral challenge. At issue across the nuances of the national settings is a deep challenge to the core claim of democracy to be the superior form of political organization of civilized peoples. The current democratic malaise is rooted not so much in the outcome of any particular election but in four central institutional challenges, each one a compro- mise of how democracy was consolidated over the past few centuries. The four are: first, the accelerated decline of political parties and other institutional forms of pop- ular engagement; second, the paralysis of the legislative branches; third, the loss of a sense of social cohesion; and fourth, the decline in state competence. While there are no doubt other candidates for inducing anxiety over the state of democracy, these four have a particular salience in theories of democratic superiority that make their decline or loss a matter of grave concern.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspen Ideas Festival Confirmed Speakers
    Aspen Ideas Festival Confirmed Speakers Carol Adelman , President, Movers and Shakespeares; Senior Fellow and Director, Center for Global Prosperity, The Hudson Institute Kenneth Adelman , Vice President, Movers and Shakespeares; Executive Director, Arts & Ideas Series, The Aspen Institute Stephen J. Adler , Editor-in-Chief, BusinessWeek Pamela A. Aguilar , Producer, Documentary Filmmaker; After Brown , Shut Up and Sing Madeleine K. Albright , founder, The Albright Group, LLC; former US Secretary of State; Trustee, The Aspen Institute T. Alexander Aleinikoff , Professor of Law and Dean, Georgetown University Law Center Elizabeth Alexander , Poet; Professor and Chair, African American Studies Department, Yale University Yousef Al Otaiba , United Arab Emirates Ambassador to the United States Kurt Andersen , Writer, Broadcaster, Editor; Host and Co-Creator, Public Radio International’s “Studio 360” Paula S. Apsell , Senior Executive Producer, PBS’s “NOVA” Anders Åslund , Senior Fellow, Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics Byron Auguste , Senior Partner, Worldwide Managing Director, Social Sector Office, McKinsey & Company Dean Baker , Co-Director, Center for Economic and Policy Research; Columnist, The Guardian ; Blogger, “Beat the Press,” The American Prospect James A. Baker III , Senior Partner, Baker Botts, LLP; former US Secretary of State Bharat Balasubramanian , Vice President, Group Research and Advanced Engineering; Product Innovations & Process Technologies, Daimler AG Jack M. Balkin , Knight Professor of Constitutional
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Law Review Online
    COPYRIGHT © 2019 VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW ASSOCIATION VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW ONLINE VOLUME 105 DECEMBER 2019 218–242 ESSAY THE MISEDUCATION OF FREE SPEECH Mary Anne Franks* INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 218 I. THE MANUFACTURED CAMPUS FREE SPEECH CRISIS ......................... 221 II. THE GOLDWATER BILL, OR THE BETRAYAL OF TINKER ..................... 232 III. COMPETING FREE SPEECH CULTURES: THE INTERNET VERSUS THE UNIVERSITY .................................................................................... 236 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................... 240 INTRODUCTION The claim that America’s campuses are in the midst of a free speech crisis has been made so often and so emphatically that it has widely become accepted as fact.1 According to the prevailing narrative, liberal * Professor of Law and Dean’s Distinguished Scholar, University of Miami School of Law; President and Legislative & Tech Policy Director, Cyber Civil Rights Initiative. Portions of this piece are excerpted from The Cult of the Constitution by Mary Anne Franks. © 2019 by Mary Anne Franks. All Rights Reserved. 1 See, e.g., Jonathan Chait, Not a Very P.C. Thing to Say: How the Language Police are Perverting Liberalism, N.Y. Mag. (Jan. 27, 2015), https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2015/- 01/not-a-very-pc-thing-to-say.html [https://perma.cc/5H7J-FVUP]; Jeannie Suk Gersen, The Trouble with Teaching Rape Law, New Yorker (Dec. 15, 2014), https://www.newyork- er.com/news/news-desk/trouble-teaching-rape-law [https://perma.cc/8KV9-T8CQ]; Greg Lu- kianoff & Jonathan Haidt, The Coddling of the American Mind, Atlantic (Sept. 2015), https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/- 399356/ [https://perma.cc/8PEM-LE7L]; Megan McArdle, Sheltered Students Go to College, Avoid Education, Bloomberg (Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the 2018-2019 Shorenstein Center Annual Report
    Annual Report 2018–2019 Contents Letter from the Director 2 2018–2019 Highlights 4 Areas of Focus Technology and Social Change Research Project 6 Misinformation Research 8 Digital Platforms and Democracy 10 News Quality Journalist’s Resource 12 The Goldsmith Awards 15 News Sustainability 18 Race & Equity 20 Events Annual Lectures 22 Theodore H. White Lecture on Press and Politics 23 Salant Lecture on Freedom of the Press 33 Speaker Series 41 The Student Experience 43 Fellows 45 Staff, Faculty, Board, and Supporters 47 From the Director Like the air we breathe and the water we drink, the information we consume sustains the health of the body politic. Good information nourishes democracy; bad information poisons it. The mission of the Shorenstein Center is to support and protect the information ecosystem. This means promoting access to reliable information through our work with journalists, policymakers, civil society, and scholars, while also slowing the spread of bad information, from hate speech to “fake news” to all kinds of distortion and media manipulation. The public square has always had to contend with liars, propagandists, dividers, and demagogues. But the tools for creating toxic information are more powerful and widely available than ever before, and the effects more dangerous. How our generation responds to threats we did not foresee, fueled by technologies we have not contained, is the central challenge of our age. How do journalists cover the impact of misinformation without spreading it further? How do technology companies,
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Magazine Industry Standard
    POINT OF VIEW: EXAMINING THE MAGAZINE INDUSTRY STANDARD A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by CRISTINA DAGLAS John Fennell, Thesis Supervisor MAY 2009 © Copyright by Cristina Daglas 2009 All Rights Reserved The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled POINT OF VIEW : EXAMINING THE MAGAZINE INDUSTRY STANDARD presented by Cristina Daglas, a candidate for the degree of master of arts, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Professor John Fennell Professor Jennifer Rowe Professor Amanda Hinnant Professor Maureen Stanton ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am immensely grateful to my thesis chair, John Fennell, who believed in both the necessity for and the feasibility of this research. When many doubted the ability to interview prominent magazine professionals, John provided support and guidance while always keeping setbacks and successes in perspective. John has been a mentor from first semester of graduate school when I enrolled in his writing course, and I am so pleased that I could pursue a topic I am incredibly passionate about with his guidance. However, this research would naturally not be what it is without the rest of my fabulous committee. Jennifer Rowe, my other mentor, adviser and friend, was an invaluable resource, as she provided big-picture edits, line edits and, most importantly, support. Amanda Hinnant provided advice in the earliest days of thesis conception as well as the scholarly perspective necessary in any academic work. Maureen Stanton was also a wonderful resource, imparting an outside, nonfiction mindset that added another dimension to this journalistic thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Controversy 11
    Controversy 11 AGING BOOMERS Boom or Bust? WHO ARE THE BOOMERS? When you hear the word “Boomer,” what do you think of? Who are the Boomers, actually? It’s important to give an answer to both questions. On the one hand, we need to consider the subjective associations we have with the word “Boomer.” On the other hand, we need to consider verifiable facts. The term “Boomer” easily evokes stereotypes. Stereotypes are con- veyed by many of the names given to Boomers over the years, labels such as “The Pepsi Generation,” “The Me Generation,” or “The Sixties Generation.” These phrases convey con- sumerism, narcissism, rebellion, and openness to change. Even the original term “Baby Boomer” doesn’t seem quite right because people in this generation aren’t babies anymore. The oldest of the Boomers are already receiving Social Security benefits, and many others are thinking seriously about retirement. Some facts are clear. There were 77 million people born in the United States between the years 1946 and 1964, and this group of people is generally referred to as the generation of the Boomers. We can see this group graphically displayed as a bulge in the population pyramid featured here. As the Boomer generation moves through the life course, as they grow older, this demographic fact will have big implications over the coming decades. But here we should pause to consider several interrelated questions. What does the term “generation” really mean? Do all individuals who fit into this demographic group form a single “generation”? Are there traits they share in common? Conversely, are there differences among members of the Boomer generation? This is but one set of questions we need to consider.
    [Show full text]
  • LEARNING from LINCOLN Principle and Pragmatism Getting the Balance Right a Symposium
    LEARNING FROM LINCOLN Principle and Pragmatism Getting the Balance Right A Symposium David Allen, Paul D. Allick, Greg Blankenship, Fran Bradley, Barry Casselman, Larry Colson, Kevin Donnelly, Jim Dueholm, Amitai Etzioni, Joseph R. Fornieri, Paul Gessing, John Gibbs, Jay P. Greene, John Gunyou, Jake Haulk, Matthew Heffron, Eric Lipman, Randolph J. May, James H. Miller, Grover Norquist, Tom Prichard, Donald P. Racheter, Lawrence W. Reed, Dane Smith, David Tuerck, Lou Wangberg, Craig Westover, Cheri Pierson Yecke, Stephen B. Young Introduction by Mitch Pearlstein Center of the American Experiment is a nonpartisan, tax-exempt, public policy and educational institution that brings conservative and free market ideas to bear on the hardest problems facing Minnesota and the nation. LEARNING FROM LINCOLN Principle and Pragmatism Getting the Balance Right A Symposium David Allen, Paul D. Allick, Greg Blankenship, Fran Bradley, Barry Casselman, Larry Colson, Kevin Donnelly, Jim Dueholm, Amitai Etzioni, Joseph R. Fornieri, Paul Gessing, John Gibbs, Jay P. Greene, John Gunyou, Jake Haulk, Matthew Heffron, Eric Lipman, Randolph J. May, James H. Miller, Grover Norquist, Tom Prichard, Donald P. Racheter, Lawrence W. Reed, Dane Smith, David Tuerck, Lou Wangberg, Craig Westover, Cheri Pierson Yecke, Stephen B. Young Introduction by Mitch Pearlstein AUGUST 2008 August 2008 LEARNING FROM LINCOLN Principle and Pragmatism Getting the Balance Right A Symposium Introduction writers, talk show hosts, and others hold fast to what they view as clear-cut principle. Mitch Pearlstein Founder & President Or, on the other hand, the extent to which such players are open to accommodation, perhaps even Principle and Pragmatism: Getting the Balance eager to reach compromise with their opponents, Right is part of year-long series of Center regardless of whether such foes are outsiders or activities aimed at re-energizing conservatism in insiders of their own party.
    [Show full text]
  • White Male Aristocracy
    Boston College Law School Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School Boston College Law School Faculty Papers 4-30-2020 White Male Aristocracy Mary Sarah Bilder Boston College Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/lsfp Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation "White Male Aristocracy," Symposium on Gerald Leonard and Saul Cornell, The Partisan Republic: Democracy, Exclusion, and the Fall of the Founders' Constitution, 1780s-1830s (Cambridge University Press, 2019), Balkinization, April 30, 2020. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law School Faculty Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Balkinization: White Male Aristocracy More Create Blog Sign In Balkinization Front page Thursday, April 30, 2020 Balkin.com Books by Balkinization White Male Aristocracy Bloggers Balkinization an unanticipated Guest Blogger consequence of Jack M. Balkin For the Symposium on Gerald Leonard and Saul Cornell, The Partisan Republic: Democracy, Exclusion, and the Fall of the Founders' Constitution, 1780s- -- Archives - - 1830s (Cambridge University Press, 2019). Mary Sarah Bilder Gerry Leonard and Saul Cornell’s fascinating book, The Partisan Republic: E-mail: Democracy, Exclusion, and the Fall of the Founders’ Constitution, 1780-1830s Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at tells the story, as I put in in a blurb, “of the unsettling transformation of yahoo.com aristocratic-tinged constitutional republic into a partisan white male democracy.” Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at In this year where we recall the Nineteenth Amendment’s re-enfranchisement of yale.edu women, the Leonard/Cornell book demands that we reevaluate the way we Ian Ayres describe the early nineteenth-century constitutional state.
    [Show full text]
  • Negotiating News at the White House
    "Enemy of the People": Negotiating News at the White House CAROL PAULI* I. INTRODUCTION II. WHITE HOUSE PRESS BRIEFINGS A. PressBriefing as Negotiation B. The Parties and Their Power, Generally C. Ghosts in the Briefing Room D. Zone ofPossibleAgreement III. THE NEW ADMINISTRATION A. The Parties and Their Power, 2016-2017 B. White House Moves 1. NOVEMBER 22: POSITIONING 2. JANUARY 11: PLAYING TIT-FOR-TAT a. Tit-for-Tat b. Warning or Threat 3. JANUARY 21: ANCHORING AND MORE a. Anchoring b. Testing the Press c. Taunting the Press d. Changingthe GroundRules e. Devaluing the Offer f. MisdirectingPress Attention * Associate Professor, Texas A&M University School of Law; J.D. Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law; M.S. Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism; former writer and editor for the Associated Press broadcast wire; former writer and producer for CBS News; former writer for the Evansville (IN) Sunday Courier& Press and the Decatur (IL) Herald-Review. I am grateful for the encouragement and generosity of colleagues at Texas A&M University School of Law, especially Professor Cynthia Alkon, Professor Susan Fortney, Professor Guillermo Garcia, Professor Neil Sobol, and Professor Nancy Welsh. I also appreciate the helpful comments of members of the AALS section on Dispute Resolution, particularly Professor Noam Ebner, Professor Caroline Kaas, Professor David Noll, and Professor Richard Reuben. Special thanks go to longtime Associated Press White House Correspondent, Mark Smith, who kindly read a late draft of this article, made candid corrections, and offered valuable observations from his experience on the front lines (actually, the second row) of the White House press room.
    [Show full text]
  • The Presidents'
    REPORT 02.11.19 All the Presidents’ Man William Martin, Ph.D., Harry and Hazel Chavanne Senior Fellow in Religion and Public Policy AUTHOR’S NOTE INTRODUCTION On December 5, 2018, I joined the Billy Graham resisted the temptations of millions who watched the state funeral money and sex more successfully than commemorating the life and legacy of some of his colleagues in public ministry, but President George H.W. Bush. As I reflected his fascination with and access to political on the meticulously planned and superbly power revealed some of his vulnerabilities effective blend of Christian and patriotic and posed a greater threat to his integrity. ritual and symbol and took note of the By 1950, he had experienced notable popular luminaries gathered in the magnificent acclaim, won respect in evangelical circles, National Cathedral in Washington, D.C., and shown that he would have no trouble particularly the five U.S. presidents financing his ministry. The key realm he had prominent in the first rows, I could not help yet to penetrate was politics, and since much thinking of someone else who belonged of his preaching featured political themes, there—Billy Graham. The famed evangelist he sought to ingratiate himself with political had been a friend to every president since figures with an eagerness that seemed Dwight Eisenhower, had participated in almost desperate. several of their inaugurations, had preached at the funerals for Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon, and had brought a healing HARRY S. TRUMAN message to a shocked nation when he spoke While in Boston early in 1950, Graham told a in this same sanctuary on September 14, reporter that his whole ambition was “to get 2001, three days after the attacks on the President Truman’s ear for 30 minutes, to World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory Leveraging: Problem Or Solution?
    GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works Faculty Scholarship 2016 Regulatory Leveraging: Problem or Solution? William E. Kovacic George Washington University Law School, [email protected] David A. Hyman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Kovacic, William E. and Hyman, David A., Regulatory Leveraging: Problem or Solution? (August 22, 2016). GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2016-41; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2016-41. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2817339 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REGULATORY LEVERAGING: PROBLEM OR SOLUTION? William E. Kovacic* and David A. Hyman** “Nice merger you’ve got here. It would be a shame if anything was to happen to it.”1 INTRODUCTION Worldwide, there are approximately 130 jurisdictions with competition laws.2 The governmental entities charged with enforcing these laws are typically called “competition agencies,”3 but many of these entities do things other than competition law. Of the thirty-six agencies listed in the Global Competition Review’s 2015 annual review, half have responsibilities beyond their competition portfolio.4 The particulars vary from country to country, but a list of the usual suspects would include consumer protection; public procurement; and public utility access, pricing, * Visiting Professor, King’s College London, Global Competition Professor of Law and Policy, George Washington University Law School, and Non-Executive Director, United Kingdom Competition and Markets Authority.
    [Show full text]