Dordt Or Dort?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dordt Or Dort? CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY • VOLUME 27 NUMBER 1 • SUMMER 2019 What is the Legacy after 400 Years? CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY SUMMER EDITION 2019 Table of Contents Dordt or Dort? MARY VANDEN BERG AWARDED What Still Matters? DORDT OR DORT? WHAT STILL 20 HENRY INSTITUTE RESEARCH GRANT 3 MATTERS? BY JUL MEDENBLIK FACULTY NEWS 22 Is it Dordt or Dort? If you are featuring a Forum issue THE CANONS OF DORDT IN THEIR to commemorate the 400th anniversary of the Synod of 4 HISTORICAL CONTEXT 22 NEW FACES BY KARIN MAAG Dordrecht, it helps to know how to spell the Canons of PARTNERING TOGETHER Dordt/Dort that resulted from that gathering. CANONS OF DORDT AND THE 25 8 HEIDELBERG CATECHISM BY LYLE D. BIERMA AVAILABLE CONFERENCES 26 & LECTURES The Synod of Dordrecht was an international Canons of Dordt/Dort. Consider these articles COMMEMORATING THE 400TH synod held in Dordrecht in 1618 - 1619 by as an appreciation of the Synod of Dordrecht ANNIVERSARY OF THE SYNOD OF DISTINGUISHED ALUMNI the Dutch Reformed Church to settle a and an invitation to the Church to continue to 12 28 controversy focused on responding to the rise learn from and be shaped by the deliberations DORDT IN WORSHIP of Arminianism. and the results from 400 years ago. BY KATHY SMITH 1618 - 1619 is a long time ago, but the Canons Editorial Note: As we finalized this issue, we faced of Dordt/Dort that resulted from that synod the question of using the spelling of Dordt has been a key framing document for many or Dort. Though the answer is complicated HOW BAD IS IT, DOC? Reformed churches, and one of the three by a number of factors – including that Dort BY STAN MAST forms of confessional unity for the Christian is an Anglicization of the word Dordt – the 16 Reformed Church in North America (The other accepted spelling is moving to Dordt. Dordt is documents being the Heidelberg Catechism the original Dutch abbreviation for Dordrecht. and the Belgic Confession). While Dort is the more traditional spelling, it seemed fitting to use Dordt for this Forum This Forum issue will not only commemorate issue that seeks to bridge the past to our the past, but also look to how Dordt/Dort current context. still functions in our present day and in the days ahead. The articles are meant to begin a conversation and help frame ongoing The Calvin Theological Seminary Forum is published Return undeliverable Canadian addresses to: consideration of the meaning and value of the two times every academic year. Calvin Theological Seminary Calvin Theological Seminary 3475 Mainway, LCD STN 1 3233 Burton St. SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 Burlington, ON L7M 1A9 © 2019 Calvin Theological Seminary Editorial Committee: Jul Medenblik, Amanda Publications Mail Agreement No. 40063614 Benckhuysen, Matthew J. Tuininga, Matt Cooke, Email: [email protected] Margaret Mwenda, Jeffrey A.D. Weima Although the Canons of Dordt1 are one of the three core confessional documents of the Christian Reformed Church, many church members today have a hazy notion at best as to why this text was written and how it grew to play such a normative role for churches in the Reformed tradition, especially those with roots in the Netherlands. To understand why the Canons became such a central document, we have to go back in time to revisit the political and religious situation in the Netherlands in the later sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. The Canons of Dordt were officially adopted by delegates at the Synod of Dordt, which met in 1618-19, four hundred years ago. But the roots of the conflicts that led to the Canons stretch even further back. By the last quarter of the sixteenth century, the seven provinces that made up the Dutch Republic (the Netherlands today) had taken some significant political and religious steps. By 1579, the seven provinces had joined together in a solemn agreement (the Union of Utrecht) to defend themselves militarily against the pressure of Catholic Spain. By 1581, the seven provinces had unilaterally deposed Philip II of Spain as their monarch. Instead, the seven provinces joined together to run their affairs in a loose confederation, first under the leadership of William of Orange, and then after his assassination in 1584, in an informal shared power arrangement between William’s son Maurice of Nassau and the leading Dutch statesman Johan van Oldenbarnevelt. Maurice of Nassau focused mainly on military leadership while van Oldenbarnevelt concentrated on day-to- day political affairs. The good working relationship between these two men broke down, however, as the younger Maurice increasingly resented van Oldenbarnevelt, and was suspicious of the older man’s willingness to negotiate an extended truce with Spain, the Dutch Republic’s archenemy. These simmering tensions between the two men were only exacerbated by being superimposed on an increasingly acrimonious debate between two factions within the Dutch Reformed church at the time. ¹ Yes, this spelling is correct! The older English spelling was Dort. The Dutch call their city Dordrecht, shortening it to Dordt. Modern KARIN MAAG scholarly usage has adopted the Dutch spelling. 5 Although the Dutch revolt from Spain broke 1603 until his death in 1609. After his death, ties with Roman Catholicism and made his supporters issued a document in 1610 How do we know that our Calvinism the official faith of the Dutch known as the Remonstrance, outlining their Republic, this decision did not settle religious ideas in five main points. The group thus got salvation is secure? affairs in the republic. In fact, unresolved its name (Remonstrants) from the title of issues rapidly came to a head. At the root of their document. these theological and ecclesiological conflicts instruction and the training of pastors. Their confirming that they would uphold its were two different visions of the church. In response, their opponents published main focus, however, was to resolve the teachings. Those who refused were dismissed For the orthodox or hardline Calvinists, the their own document, known as the Counter- theological controversy over the doctrine of from their posts. In the end, two hundred situation was straightforward: although the Remonstrance, in 1611. Crucially, they election. To that end, thirteen pastors and pastors were dismissed. Many of them were visible church included everyone (both wheat also gained the support of Maurice of professors representing the Remonstrant also then banished from the territory of and weeds, as in Jesus’ parable in Matthew Nassau, who threw his weight behind these position were summoned to attend the the Dutch Republic, only returning after 13), God from eternity knew His own, chosen theological traditionalists in order to gain Synod’s meetings. Their group was dwarfed Maurice’s death in 1625. not because of their great faith or piety but leverage against van Oldenbarnevelt, who by the number of delegates upholding out of His grace. The orthodox Calvinists supported the moderate faction within the traditionalist positions. However, already How does knowing more about the historical wanted to transform Dutch society into their Dutch Reformed church. By the second from the start of the proceedings, both sides context of the Canons of Dordt help church vision of a more disciplined and pious faith decade of the seventeenth century, therefore, approached the gathering from very different members today understand the enduring community, along the lines of Reformed the political and religious situation within the perspectives. The Remonstrants held that value of the Canons? First, it is worth Geneva. Thus, they were strong proponents Reformed community in the Dutch Republic they were participating in a conference or remembering that no theological controversy of the legitimacy of church discipline was very fraught. In August 1618, after van a debate to discern the truth of the matter. takes place in a vacuum. The Canons were handled by pastors and elders. They saw the Oldenbarnevelt had established armed city Their opponents, however, believed that written in response to a very specific conflict civil authorities primarily as upholders and militias in the province of Holland ostensibly the Remonstrants were being tried for their within Dutch Reformed Christianity over how enforcers of the church’s decisions. They also to keep the peace but in practice to protect theological views before a body of their the doctrines of predestination and election objected to what they saw as unwarranted the moderate factions in the Dutch Reformed peers. Given the weight of numbers on should be taught. Bearing this context in interference of the government in church church, Maurice had him arrested on charges the Counter-Remonstrant side, the issue mind helps modern-day Christians interpret affairs when it came to selecting pastors, of treason. Meanwhile, the hardliners within was never in doubt. By January 1619, the the often-polemical tone of the document. elders, or schoolteachers. Members of this the Dutch Reformed church agreed that the Remonstrant delegates were ejected from the Second, at the heart of the seventeenth- group included pastors and professors across only way to bring an end to the doctrinal and synod, and by May 6, 1619, their opponents century debates are issues that still resonate the Dutch Republic, including Franciscus ecclesiological conflicts was to call together had crafted and ratified the Canons of for believers today: what role does our Gomarus, professor of theology at the a synod. In order to give its decisions more Dordt, to refute the Remonstrants’ views and response in faith to God’s offer of salvation University of Leiden and the University legitimacy, the church leadership and the uphold the Counter-Remonstrants’ position in Christ play in the process? How do we of Groningen, and Sibbrandus Lubbertus, government decided to hold an international on double predestination and election.
Recommended publications
  • The Reformed Church in the United States Convened Its 256Th Session of Synod at the Schnabel and Kevin Hamilton
    The Reformed Church in the T he Abstract of the 256th Synod is hereby affectionately dedicated to the memory of United States the Rev. Donald R. Vance (1947–2001) a faithful servant of the Lord Jesus Christ and a beloved friend. May his ministry among us continue to bear fruit for generations to come! — The 256th Synod of the RCUS Abstract of the Minutes of the 256th Synod May 20–23, 2002 Emmanuel Reformed Church Sutton, Nebraska Finances .......................................................... 63 Judicial ........................................................... 64 Ministerial Aid ..................................................... 65 Minutes of Classes .................................................. 65 Missions .......................................................... 66 Table of Contents Nominations ....................................................... 68 Overtures ......................................................... 70 Publications ....................................................... 71 Special Judicial ..................................................... 73 DIRECTORY .............................................................. 1 Miscellaneous Reports and Other Business ................................. 74 Congregations of the Reformed Church ..................................... 3 Adjournment .......................................................... 74 Roll of Synod ......................................................... 10 Appendix ................................................................ 75 ABSTRACT
    [Show full text]
  • Affirm the Belhar? Yes, but Not As a Doctrinal Standard
    AFFIRM THE BELHAR? YES, BUT NOT AS A DOCTRINAL STANDARD A Contribution to the Discussion in CRCNA John W. Cooper Professor of Philosophical Theology Calvin Theological Seminary August 2011 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 My Position and Involvement in the Discussion A Momentous Decision: Our Doctrinal Identity and Integrity The Burden of Proof WHY THE BELHAR CONFESSION CANNOT BE A DOCTRINAL STANDARD 6 Confusion about “Confession” The Belhar Confession Lacks the Content of a Doctrinal Standard The Belhar Confession is Doctrinally Ambiguous The Social Gospel? Liberation Theology? Is the Gospel at Stake: Status Confessionis? Biblical Justice or Liberation Ideology? CONSEQUENCES OF ADOPTING THE BELHAR AS A DOCTRINAL STANDARD 20 Adopting the Belhar Confession Would Compromise Our Confessional Integrity The Belhar Confession and Ecumenical Relations A Gift, or an Offer We Can’t Refuse? Do Racial Justice and Reconciliation Require Adoption of BC as a Confession? The Belhar, CRCNA Polity, and Denominational Unity Simple Majority? Conscientious Objection? WHY WE SHOULD AFFIRM THE BELHAR AS A TESTIMONY 27 The Basic Objection Neutralized Principled Decision or Political Compromise? Faithful Witness to Biblical Justice and Reconciliation Benefits for Ecumenical Relations and Racial Reconciliation in CRCNA Can We Make a Confession a Testimony? 2 AFFIRM THE BELHAR? YES, BUT NOT AS A DOCTRINAL STANDARD INTRODUCTION My Position and Involvement in the Discussion Synod 2009 recommended that Synod 2012 adopt the Belhar Confession [hereafter BC] as the CRCNA‟s fourth Form of Unity, that is, as a definitive doctrinal standard.1 I oppose that recommendation because I believe that the confessional and theological identity and integrity of the CRCNA are at stake.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biblical,Confessional,And Theological Position Paper Of
    Central Avenue Christian Reformed Church STATEMENT OF CONVICTION adopted by Council August 22, 2011; November 28, 2011; and April 23, 2012 We believe it to be God’s will for our local church to be an instrument of Biblical and confessional leadership, as well as preserving sound doctrine and life (1 Timothy 4:16; Romans 16:17). We seek to affirm our belief in the Word of God and the historic Reformed faith as expressed in the Three-Forms of Unity – Belgic Confession, Heidelberg Catechism, and the Canons of Dort. This “Statement of Conviction” gives indication to the congregation and the broader Christian community how Central Avenue Christian Reformed Church will be lead. We affirm and commit our convictions in light of this belief as follows: The Sacraments WE AFFIRM: 1. That Christ has instituted two sacraments for His church: baptism and the Lord’s Supper so that by our faithful use of them He might make us understand more clearly the promise of the gospel, and put His seal on that promise. 2. That Baptism should be given to believers and their children as a sign and seal of their initiation into the covenant community in keeping with God’s gracious and covenantal dealings with sinners saved by grace through faith in Jesus Christ (Genesis 17; Romans 4:9-11; Galatians 3:26-29; Isaiah 44:1-3; Acts 2:38, 39; Acts 10:47; Acts 16:31; Colossians 2: 11; I Corinthians 10:1, 2; I Corinthians 7:14; Matthew 28:18-21). 3. That the Lord’s Supper should be observed repeatedly by all those who have publicly professed their faith in Jesus Christ as the only One who can save them from their sins; showing that they are truly sorry for their sins and earnestly desire to lead a godly, holy life in Christ and having properly examined themselves, their faith, hope, and love for God and neighbor as revealed in I Corinthians 11:23-29.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creeds and Confessions
    The Creeds and Confessions In the Book of Praise, on the pages 493 to 588, you can find the creeds and confessions. Creeds (see Book of Praise, p. 493-496) Read the introduction to all the Creeds (p.493). Which Creeds do we have? How are they called? (See p. 493) Why? The creeds were written for two reasons. First, to give a short summary of the Biblical doctrine, so that those who wanted to join the church and the youth who wanted to profess their faith, could be taught using these creeds. Especially the Apostle's Creed is written for this purpose. Second, to defend the Christian doctrine against heresies, which came up in the first centuries after the Ascension of our Lord Jesus Christ. Especially the Nicene Creed and the Athanasian Creed are written for this purpose. Confessions (Book of Praise, p. 499-588, the Three Forms of Unity) What are confessions? Which Confessions do we have? How are they called? (p. 499) Why? These confessions are adopted by the Great Synod of Dort (1618-1619) as the confessions of the church. That was just after the Great Reformation. Most of the Reformed Churches all over the earth nowadays have these three confessions, together with the creeds, as their doctrinal standards. Many of the Reformed Churches are from Dutch origin. Other churches, which call themselves 'presbyterian' and have their origins in Great Brittain, have another Reformed Confession which they use as their doctrinal standard. This is the Westminster Confession (composed by the Westminster Assembly in 1647). In the Reformed Churches, the office bearers were required to subscribe to the three confessions.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to a REFORMED CHURCH
    Welcome to a REFORMED CHURCH A GUIDE FOR PILGRIMS DANIEL R. HYDE A DIVISION OF LIGONIER MINISTRIES • ORLANDO, FLORIDA Welcome to a Reformed Church: A Guide for Pilgrims © 2010 by Daniel R. Hyde Published by Reformation Trust Publishing a division of Ligonier Ministries 400 Technology Park, Lake Mary, FL 32746 www.ligonier.org www.reformationtrust.com Printed in city, state Printing company name Month and year First printing All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or otherwise—without the prior written permission of the publisher, Reformation Trust. The only exception is brief quotations in printed reviews. Cover design: Cover illustration: Interior design and typeset: Katherine Lloyd, Colorado Springs, Colo. Unless otherwise indicated, all Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version, copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Scripture quotations marked NASB are from The New American Standard Bible.® Copyright © The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1995. Used by permission. Scripture quotations marked NIV are from the HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNA TIONAL VERSION®. NIV®. Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan. All rights reserved. Scripture quotations marked KJV are from The Holy Bible, King James Version. Scripture quotations marked ASV are from The Holy Bible, American Standard Version. Unless otherwise indicated, all quotations of the Christian creeds and Reformed confessions are from The Creeds of Christendom, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Evangelical Reunion
    Evangelical Reunion John M. Frame Originally published by Baker Book House (Grand Rapids, 1991). Dedication To the Churches Who Nurtured Me Beverly Heights United Presbyterian Church Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Westerly Road Church Princeton, New Jersey Covenant Orthodox Presbyterian Church Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Westminster Orthodox Presbyterian Church Hamden, Connecticut New Haven Evangelical Free Church New Haven, Connecticut Community Orthodox Presbyterian Church Blue Bell, Pennsylvania New Life Presbyterian Church Escondido, California Covenant Presbyterian Church Winter Park, Florida Preface (1990) Although I teach theology, I have never specialized in the doctrine of the church, or "ecclesiology" if you prefer. Still, I haven't been able to avoid thinking about the church, the way I've been able to avoid thinking about, say, the timing of the Rapture. In a sense the old saying is true, that if God is our father, the church is our mother. All of what I know about God and about Jesus, I have learned, directly or indirectly, from the church. Most of my spiritual encouragement, challenge, comfort, has been through the church. Most of my friendships have been within the church. (I do admire Christians who are able to develop deep friendships with non-Christians, but I don't seem to have that gift.) Most of the love I have known has been in the church. I found my wife in the church, and now my children are growing up in the church. My home away from home is always the church. My favorite music is the music of the church. My favorite people are the people of the church.
    [Show full text]
  • Confession of Belhar
    Belhar Resources The Christian Reformed Church in North America decided at its 2009 Synod to encourage its churches to study the Belhar Confession (see below for copy) and consider adopting it as a fourth confession along with the Three-Forms of Unity (Heidelberg Catechism, Belgic Confession and Canons of Dort) which all office-bearers subscribe to currently as teaching faithfully the Word of God. The CRCNA has offered several resources for study (www.crcna.org/belhar) and 1st CRC in Seattle, WA, has offered a resources page (www.seattlecrc.org/BelharConfession) – being the congregation that originated the request for the CRC to adopt the Belhar. To truly consider and study the Belhar, congregations and individuals need to understand both the pros and the cons of adopting the Belhar in our context. Most of the resources put forth by the denomination tend to advocate for adoption. Below are listed some additional resources that provide a balance to that view. Granted, most of the resources below do not favor the Belhar Confession for various reasons, but since the CRC’s resources already lay out the benefits, it was thought best to focus on the cautions we need to consider. Dr. John Cooper (Calvin Seminary professor of philosophical theology): “Belhar Yes. Doctrinal Standard No!” – August, 2011 Dr. John Bolt (Calvin Seminary professor of theology) – ”Belhar Reflections”: www.crconnect.blogspot.com – scroll down through the older posts. There seems to be three of them there. Dr. Bolt also has a debate with Shiao Chong that is available here: http://www.christiancourier.ca/Belhar.html Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITY, Liberty, Charity
    Volume 45/7 August 2018 UNITY, Liberty, Charity “In Essentials Unity, In Non-Essentials Liberty, In All Things Charity” The Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648) – Article 29 of our church order deals with compliance on matters of con- learning from history 3 science, and states: Assemblies may not compel compliance on the part of a minority in matters of conscience not clearly defined in the Word of God and the Forms of Unity. Biblical tolerance in a post-modern world 8 In his commentary, the late Dick Vanderpyl writes the following: The principle has already been established in article 27 of this Church Order, that decisions at ecclesiastical assemblies must be reached only upon Outward focus due consideration and whenever possible by common consent. And it is defi- The coming of the Gospel to our nitely not satisfactory to have small majorities in policy-making decisions. We Pacific neighbours 12 should seek to convince one another from God’s Word and persuade each other with arguments in harmony with our confessions. To seek true unity of What has happened to mutual discipline? 15 purpose we should aim for as much unanimity as possible. Such decisions are regarded as settled and binding, unless it is proved that they are in conflict with the Word of God or the Church Order. Attempts Letter to the editor 17 must then be made to revise or nullify such decisions. However, article 29, under consideration now, makes it clear that no assembly may force a minority to comply with a decision when it is a matter Letters from New Zealand 18 of conscience not clearly defined in God’s Word and the Confessions.
    [Show full text]
  • Belgic Confession – Notes
    N O T E S on the Belgic Confession Designed in 18 lessons for a Senior Catechism Class with assignments and spot-check questions Introduction These NOTES were handed out to Senior Catechism Class students in 2005–2006. The summarized comments are generally based on J. VanBruggen's The Church Says Amen. Lessons included assignments to memorize Bible texts and Question and Answers of the Heidelberg Catechism (in review), that is, QA 3,4,5,6,7 ,8,9, 10,11, 17,21, 24,25, ,27,28, 35,36, 37, 43, 49,52,54,55, 61,62,63, 65,66, 70,76,83,85 ,91,104. Some extra reading was at times added, as also shown below between brackets or as added to these handouts, such as overviews of the Law and our Liturgy. (Graphic guides about Facts, Events and Origin of the Bible, Two Ways into Eternity and an Intro to the Church Order had been added as well, along with a write-up of The Disaster of 1944 and the Consequent Liberation (see elsewhere for copies). A brief written quiz was given at the start of the next class shown at the end.. Dennis Teitsma, (edited December 2016) Lesson B.C. article HC Q&A 1. Introduction – One God known from His Work and Word 1,2 26 2. The divinely inspired canonical Bible (CoD. III/IV, 6-8) 3-7 21 3. God's Unity and Trinity (Athanasian Creed) 8,9 24,25 4. The Deity of the second and third Person of Trinity (CoD. III/IV12; RE #8 )10,11 17 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I: Assembly Actions
    PART I: ASSEMBLY ACTIONS VOLUMEID PCA DIGEST OF ASSEMBLY ACTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1994 -1998 BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES p.11 CHRISTIAN EDUCATION & PUBLICATIONS p.11 CHRISTIAN FAMILY EMPHASIS WEEK p.11 MESSENGER p.11 PRESBYTERIAN YOlITH IN AMERICA p.11 PSALM SINGING p.11 TRUE loVE WAITS CAMPAIGN p.12 COMMUNICATIONS p. 12 PlllLOSOPHY STATEMENT p.12 COMMUNION p.13 COMPENSATION FOR COORDINATORS & DIRECTORS p. 15 COMPUTERS p. 15 COVENANT COLLEGE p. 15 ART EXlllBIT ISSUE p.15 Statement of President Brock p.15 NEW ERA PlllLANTIIROPY p.16 STATEMENT OF POLICY RE: CAMPUS SPEAKERS p.16 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE p. 17 COVENANT THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY p. 18 BYLAWS p.309 CHAIR OF MINISTRY & EVANGELISM ESTABLISHED p. 18 RESOLUTION OF PRAISE FOR 40 YEARS SERVICE p.18 CREATION p. 18 ADVISORY COMMITTEE To STUDY p. 18 DIVORCE & REMARRIAGE p. 18 and 99 EV ANGELICALS AND CATHOLICS TOGETHER, Response to p. 371 (See under Roman Catholic Church) GENERAL ASSEMBLY p. 19 ACTIONS, BINDING CHARACTER OF p. 19 FINANCIAL POLICIES p.20 Borrowing p.20 Budgets p.21 Cost Of Standing Committees p.22 LocATIONS p. 22 MODERATOR-HONORARY p.22 PARTNERSHIP SHARES (FORMERLY ASKINGS) p.22 PLANNING: 25m ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION p.23 PROGRAMS/ANNuAL ADDRESSES p.23 REGISTRATION FEE p.23 STRUCTURE OF PCA, Relationship of Agencies to GA p. 465 UNFUNDED MANoA TES p. 24 VENDORS p.24 7 HOMOSEXUALITY p. 25 "OPPOSE DISNEY'S PROMOTION OF HOMOSEXUAL LIFESTYLE" p.26 "OPPOSE LEGALIZATION OF HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGES" p.26 "STATEMENT To EPISCOPAL CHURCH FOR ORDINATION p. 25 OF HOMOSEXUALS" INSURANCE, ANNUITIES & RELIEF p.26 BYLAWS p.
    [Show full text]
  • Assurance and Good Works in the Three Forms of Unity Manuel Kuhs
    ASSURANCE AND GOOD WORKS IN THE THREE FORMS OF UNITY Manuel Kuhs Introduction And if the elect of God were deprived of this solid comfort, that they shall finally obtain the victory, and of this infallible pledge or earnest of eternal glory [in short, if they were deprived of assurance], they would be of all men the most miserable. Thus ends Canons V:10. It puts into most eloquent words the preciousness of the assurance of salvation to the child of God. When the child of God, who believes God’s Word, and who believes in the sinfulness of the world, the com- ing judgment and the wrath of God against sin, doubts his own assurance, he thus doubts whether God loves him, and seriously considers the possibility that God is set against him with all His might and being, and will throw him into the eternal fires of hell. And as such, the child of God who has no assur- ance is “of all men the most miserable.” On the other hand, the believer who is assured of God’s eternal, immutable, omnipotent love for him can and does count everything else as “dung” in comparison with this knowledge (Phil. 3:8). In short, without assurance all Christian doctrine with everything God has done for His people through Christ is of absolutely no benefit to God’s children here on earth. For this reason, the doctrine of assurance, and the question of how this assurance is obtained, ought to be very important to each believer, especially because our confessions teach “that believers in this life have to struggle with various carnal doubts, and that under grievous temptations they are not always sensible of this full assurance of faith and certainty of persevering” (Canons V:11).
    [Show full text]
  • The Westminster Confession of Faith
    CENTERPOINT SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH FALL 2016 The Westminster Confession of Faith (1) CONFESSIONS 1. “No Creed but the Bible!” – some contemporary problems that make the very idea of a Confession or Creed unnecessary at best and deeply suspicious at worst. a. History is bunk b. Language is slippery (“a word means what I say it means”) c. No other “church” can tell us what to believe. We are the church – period! d. Misgivings about theology – especially Systematic (formulaic) theology i. Inductive v. deductive Bible Study (top-down/Bottom-up) ii. Unity of truth – WHOLE Bible. Big picture v. little picture iii. Imposition of “foreign” grids (e.g. Aristotelian philosophy) e. “Doctrine” [noun: a belief or set of beliefs held and taught by a church, political party, or other group]; “Dogma” [noun: a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true]. i. “Follow the pattern of the sound words that you have heard from me, in the faith and love that are in Christ Jesus” (2 Tim. 1:13). Pattern = ὑποτύπωσις. KJV “the form of sound words.” Every discipline has its own set of specialist words. Paul does not simply say, “memorize the Old Testament.” ii. Phil 2:5-11 as a summary of basic Christology; iii. 1 Tim 3:16 “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.” iv. 2 Thess. 2:15 “So then, brothers, stand firm and hold to the traditions [παράδοσις] that you were taught by us, either by our spoken word or by our letter.” v.
    [Show full text]