DOCSLIB.ORG

Cape Spencer to Beaufort Sea

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

26 SEP 2021 U.S. Coast Pilot 9, Chapter 3 ¢ 107 Cape Spencer to Beaufort Sea (1) Alaska, the largest of the United States, occupies Kodiak Island, Sand Point in the Shumagin Islands and the northwest part of the North American continent. King Cove and False Pass on the southeast side of the The State is bordered on the east and south by Canada peninsula. and on the west and north by the Pacific and Arctic (8) The Aleutian Islands are rugged and mountainous, Oceans. The northernmost point of Alaska is Point with numerous off-lying islets, rocks and reefs. Some Barrow (71°23'N., 156°28'W.); the westernmost point of the larger islands provide more or less sheltered is Cape Wrangell (52°55'N., 172°26'E.) on Attu Island; anchorage. and the southernmost point is Nitrof Point (51°13.0'N., (9) The Bering Sea is characterized in general by 179°07.7'W.), on Amatignak Island. Cape Muzon shallow waters, with extensive sand and mud flats along (54°40'N., 132°41'W.) is on the historic parallel that is the the shores, particularly in the approaches to the various coastal boundary between Alaska and Canada’s British bays and rivers. There is little rock formation, and its Columbia. Cape Muzon is on the north side of Dixon occurrence, where found, is limited in area. Entrance and is 480 miles northwest of Cape Flattery, (10) The Arctic coast is mostly low, especially to the Washington; between the two United States capes is the north of Cape Lisburne. The principal landing places are coastal area of British Columbia. Kotzebue and Barrow. (2) Alaska was purchased from Russia in 1867 and (11) became an organized territory of the United States in Disposal Sites and Dumping Grounds 1912. By Presidential proclamation of January 3, 1959, (12) These areas are rarely mentioned in the Coast Pilot Alaska officially became the 49th state of the United but are shown on the nautical charts. (See Disposal Sites States. Principal resources are oil, timber, fish and coal. and Dumping Grounds, chapter 1, and charts for limits.) Alaska has a general ocean coastline of 5,770 nautical (13) miles and a tidal shoreline of 29,462 miles. The state is so Aids to navigation huge that its description requires two complete volumes (14) Lights, although infrequent along much of this coast, of the National Ocean Service’s ten-volume series of do mark the important headlands and passages; sound United States Coast Pilots. signals are at most of the principal lights. Many of the (3) Coast Pilot 9 deals with the Pacific and Arctic buoys in the important passages are equipped with radar coasts of Alaska from Cape Spencer to Beaufort Sea; reflectors, which greatly increase the range at which the general ocean coastline totals 5,520 nautical miles, and buoys may be detected. Many of the aids to navigation in tidal shoreline totals 18,377 miles. Included are the Gulf Alaska are seasonal. There are aerolights in Alaska that of Alaska coast and islands, the Alaska Peninsula, the are useful for navigation purposes, but these should not Aleutian Islands and the United States coasts and islands be confused with marine lights. (See the Light List for a of the Bering Sea, Chukchi Sea and Beaufort Sea. complete description of navigational aids.) (4) Between Cape Spencer and Cape St. Elias, the coast is fairly regular. Along this stretch are Lituya Bay, Yakutat (15) Bay and Icy Bay. The great Malaspina Glacier comes to Electronic navigation within 3 miles of the ocean west of Yakutat Bay. (16) Radar, radar beacons (Racons), GPS/DGPS, and the (5) From Cape St. Elias to Cook Inlet, the characteristic radio direction finder have given the navigator means of formation is generally rocky; the waters are mostly deep, determining his position in any weather. The mariner but there are also great variations in depth. The visible should, however, appreciate the limitations and sources topographic features, such as the mountains and the of error of the various systems. Radar should be properly rugged islands, probably are duplicated underwater. calibrated and tuned. Radio direction finders must be (6) In Cook Inlet, the characteristic formation is the calibrated, and the operator should become experienced result of glacial action. The shores are strewn with in the use of the equipment. Radar, radio direction boulders, some of great size, and soundings indicate the finder - GPS/DGPS shipboard equipment are subject to existence underwater of similar boulders, particularly in malfunctions that may not be immediately apparent to areas of hard bottom where the boulders have not been the operator, and there are conditions when radio signals buried by silt. may be subject to error when the shipboard receiver is (7) West from Cook Inlet, and throughout the islands off operating properly. Soundings should always be taken the southeast side of the Alaska Peninsula, rock formation in critical places, and the position should be checked by is again found. The principal harbors are Kodiak on visual bearings when possible. 108 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 9, Chapter 3 26 SEP 2021 (17) Navigation by radar is facilitated along the coast of notification of arrivals, departures, hazardous conditions Alaska and in the various passages by the generally high and certain dangerous cargoes to the Captain of the Port.) relief of the coastline. The rugged coast provides many (26) A Traffic Separation Schemehas been established points, headland, large offshore rocks and islands that in Prince William Sound. (See chapter 4, for details.) give accurate radar ranges and bearings. Radar ranges (27) A Vessel Traffic Service (VTS)has been established are more accurate than radar bearings. When two or more in the Prince William Sound area. The Service has been suitable targets can be positively identified, a better fix is established to prevent collisions and groundings and to obtained by radar ranges alone than by radar ranges and protect the navigable waters from environmental harm. bearings. When visibility permits, visual bearings should (28) The VTS provides for a Vessel Traffic Center (VTC) always be taken. When positioning by a bearing and a that regulates the routing and movement of vessels by radar range of a single object, the identification of the radar surveillance, movement reports of vessels, VHF- target must be positive. Floating aids to navigation should FM radio communications and specific reporting points. not be used as targets for fixing position. The system consists of traffic lanes, a separation zone and (18) The U.S. Coast Guard no longer maintains reporting points. radiobeacons. However, commercial radio stations can (29) The Service is mandatory. (See 33 CFR 161.1 be used instead. Radio direction finder equipment is through 161.23 and 161.60, chapter 2, for rules and subject to several kinds of errors. Bearings obtained at regulations, and chapter 4 for details.) twilight or at night or bearings that are almost parallel (30) to the coast should be accepted with reservations, due to Areas to be Avoided “night effect” and to the distortion of the radio waves if (31) Along the Aleutian Islands are areas that require traveling overland. Other sources of error in the system specific attention. These areas are noted on charts as may be avoided by the proper calibration of the shipboard Areas to be Avoided and are adopted by the International receiver. Maritime Organization in an effort to reduce the risk of (19) The frequent occurrence of fog along this coast a marine casualty and resulting pollution and damage to makes radar an invaluable aid in detecting other traffic the environment. See chapter 7—Aleutian Islands, for and obtaining a line of position and/or fix. Bridge-to- additional information. bridge radio communication (VHF-FM) is another useful (32) aid, regardless of weather, in waters where maneuvering Anchorages room is limited or restricted. The use of VHF-FM (33) Many of the harbors in the mountainous areas are equipment for short-range communication is increasing, subject to violent williwaws. These severe gusts may and so are the number of vessels equipped with this come from any direction and should be considered when equipment. The primary advantages of this radio system selecting an anchorage. are its line-of-sight characteristic and relative freedom from static interference. (34) Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) (20) COLREGS Demarcation Lines (35) The chapters that follow may contain references to Federally designated Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) (21) The International Regulations for Preventing occurring in navigable coastal waters of the United Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS) apply on all the States mid-Atlantic coast. The critical environmental sounds, bays, harbors and inlets of Alaska. (See 33 CFR information is intended to inform readers about the Part 80, chapter 2.) location, purpose and legal restrictions of coastal MPAs, (22) with an emphasis on activities of interest to the maritime Shipping Safety Fairways community. Extensive MPAs are listed here. Selected (23) A system of shipping safety fairways has been regional MPAs are included in subsequent chapters. For a established in the approaches to Prince William Sound complete inventory of MPAs go to marineprotectedareas. and through Unimak Pass. The Prince William Sound noaa.gov. Safety Fairway, extending southeast from Hinchinbrook (36) Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge, Entrance, has separate inbound and outbound traffic spread along most of Alaska’s 47,300-mile coastline, is lanes that merge in the northwest part. The Unimak Pass the most extensive MPA in Alaska. Safety Fairway is comprised of an east-west fairway with (37) Steller Sea Lion Protection Areas are numerous a connecting north-south fairway in the west section.
Recommended publications
  • Geologic Maps of the Eastern Alaska Range, Alaska, (44 Quadrangles, 1:63360 Scale)

    Geologic Maps of the Eastern Alaska Range, Alaska, (44 Quadrangles, 1:63360 Scale)

    Report of Investigations 2015-6 GEOLOGIC MAPS OF THE EASTERN ALASKA RANGE, ALASKA, (44 quadrangles, 1:63,360 scale) descriptions and interpretations of map units by Warren J. Nokleberg, John N. Aleinikoff, Gerard C. Bond, Oscar J. Ferrians, Jr., Paige L. Herzon, Ian M. Lange, Ronny T. Miyaoka, Donald H. Richter, Carl E. Schwab, Steven R. Silva, Thomas E. Smith, and Richard E. Zehner Southeastern Tanana Basin Southern Yukon–Tanana Upland and Terrane Delta River Granite Jarvis Mountain Aurora Peak Creek Terrane Hines Creek Fault Black Rapids Glacier Jarvis Creek Glacier Subterrane - Southern Yukon–Tanana Terrane Windy Terrane Denali Denali Fault Fault East Susitna Canwell Batholith Glacier Maclaren Glacier McCallum Creek- Metamorhic Belt Meteor Peak Slate Creek Thrust Broxson Gulch Fault Thrust Rainbow Mountain Slana River Subterrane, Wrangellia Terrane Phelan Delta Creek River Highway Slana River Subterrane, Wrangellia Terrane Published by STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL & GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS 2015 GEOLOGIC MAPS OF THE EASTERN ALASKA RANGE, ALASKA, (44 quadrangles, 1:63,360 scale) descriptions and interpretations of map units Warren J. Nokleberg, John N. Aleinikoff, Gerard C. Bond, Oscar J. Ferrians, Jr., Paige L. Herzon, Ian M. Lange, Ronny T. Miyaoka, Donald H. Richter, Carl E. Schwab, Steven R. Silva, Thomas E. Smith, and Richard E. Zehner COVER: View toward the north across the eastern Alaska Range and into the southern Yukon–Tanana Upland highlighting geologic, structural, and geomorphic features. View is across the central Mount Hayes Quadrangle and is centered on the Delta River, Richardson Highway, and Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS). Major geologic features, from south to north, are: (1) the Slana River Subterrane, Wrangellia Terrane; (2) the Maclaren Terrane containing the Maclaren Glacier Metamorphic Belt to the south and the East Susitna Batholith to the north; (3) the Windy Terrane; (4) the Aurora Peak Terrane; and (5) the Jarvis Creek Glacier Subterrane of the Yukon–Tanana Terrane.
  • Status and Occurrence of Parakeet Auklet (Aethia Psittacula) in British Columbia

    Status and Occurrence of Parakeet Auklet (Aethia Psittacula) in British Columbia

    Status and Occurrence of Parakeet Auklet (Aethia psittacula) in British Columbia. By Rick Toochin and Louis Haviland. Introduction and Distribution The Parakeet Auklet (Aethia psittacula) is a small species of auklet found breeding in the Beringia region of Alaska and Russia (Gaston and Jones 1998). This species has an Alaskan population estimated at 1 million birds (Gaston and Jones 1998). There is also a Russian population, but the exact population total is not known, due to a lack of population inventory work, but it is estimated to number about 400,000 birds with the vast majority, about 300,000 birds, found in the Sea of Okhotsk (Gaston and Jones 1998). The Parakeet Auklet has breeding colonies that are found on rocky mainland points and islands in the Gulf of Alaska (Jones et al. 2001). These sites include: Shumagin Island, Semidi Isand, Chirikof Island near Kodiak, locally in Kenai Peninsula and southeastern Alaska with small numbers south to St. Lazaria, Hazy and Forrester Island; and in the Aleutian Islands west to Buldir and Agattu Island; and in the Bering Sea at Little Diomede, St. Lawrence Island, King Island, St. Matthew Island, Pribilof Island and Nunivak Island (Sowls et al. 1978). The Parakeet Auklet also breeds in Russia in the Kurile Island chain with colonies on Chirinkontan, Lovushki, Raikoke, Matua, Yankicha, Simushir, Brat Chirpoev, Urup, and Iturup Island (Jones et al. 2001, Brazil 2009). They are also breeding on islands in the Sea of Okhotsk with colonies on Sakhalin, Tyuleniy, Iona, Talan, and Yamskyie Island (Jones et al. 2001, Brazil 2009). The Parakeet Auklet is also found breeding on Commander Island, and northwards locally along coast of the Kamchatka Peninsula, on Karaginski Island, Cape Navarin, and on Chukotka Peninsula (Konyukhov 1989, Kondratyev et al.
  • Southcentral Alaska Stock

    Southcentral Alaska Stock

    Revised: April 2014 NORTHERN SEA OTTER (Enhydra lutris kenyoni): Southcentral Alaska Stock STOCK DEFINITION AND GEOGRAPHIC RANGE Sea otters occur in nearshore coastal waters of the U.S. along the North Pacific Rim from the Aleutian Islands to California. The species is most commonly observed within the 40-meter (approximately 12.2 feet [ft]) depth contour because the animals require frequent access to benthic foraging habitat in subtidal and intertidal zones (Reidman and Estes 1990). Sea otters are not migratory and generally do not disperse over long distances, although movements of tens of kilometers (km) (tens of miles [mi]) are common (Garshelis and Garshelis 1984). Annual home range sizes of adult sea otters are relatively small, with male territories ranging from 4 to 11 square kilometers (km2) (approximately 10.5 to 28.5 square miles[mi2]) and adult female home ranges from a few to 24 km2 (approximately 62 mi2) (Garshelis and Garshelis 1984; Ralls et al. 1988; Jameson 1989). Due to their benthic foraging, sea otter distribution is largely limited by their ability to dive to the sea floor (Bodkin et al. 2004). 1 Figure 1. Approximate distribution and stock boundaries of northern sea otters in Alaska waters (shaded area). The spatial scale at which sea otter populations are managed remains an important, although largely unexplored issue (Bodkin and Ballachey 2010) deserving further study. Bodkin and Ballachey (2010) used models of sea otter mortality to show that range-wide reductions and extirpations during the commercial fur trade of the 18th and 19th centuries occurred not simply because of excessive harvest, but because the harvest was not allocated proportional to the abundance and distribution of sea otters.
  • P1616 Text-Only PDF File

    P1616 Text-Only PDF File

    A Geologic Guide to Wrangell–Saint Elias National Park and Preserve, Alaska A Tectonic Collage of Northbound Terranes By Gary R. Winkler1 With contributions by Edward M. MacKevett, Jr.,2 George Plafker,3 Donald H. Richter,4 Danny S. Rosenkrans,5 and Henry R. Schmoll1 Introduction region—his explorations of Malaspina Glacier and Mt. St. Elias—characterized the vast mountains and glaciers whose realms he invaded with a sense of astonishment. His descrip­ Wrangell–Saint Elias National Park and Preserve (fig. tions are filled with superlatives. In the ensuing 100+ years, 6), the largest unit in the U.S. National Park System, earth scientists have learned much more about the geologic encompasses nearly 13.2 million acres of geological won­ evolution of the parklands, but the possibility of astonishment derments. Furthermore, its geologic makeup is shared with still is with us as we unravel the results of continuing tectonic contiguous Tetlin National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska, Kluane processes along the south-central Alaska continental margin. National Park and Game Sanctuary in the Yukon Territory, the Russell’s superlatives are justified: Wrangell–Saint Elias Alsek-Tatshenshini Provincial Park in British Columbia, the is, indeed, an awesome collage of geologic terranes. Most Cordova district of Chugach National Forest and the Yakutat wonderful has been the continuing discovery that the disparate district of Tongass National Forest, and Glacier Bay National terranes are, like us, invaders of a sort with unique trajectories Park and Preserve at the north end of Alaska’s panhan­ and timelines marking their northward journeys to arrive in dle—shared landscapes of awesome dimensions and classic today’s parklands.
  • Unalaska Hazard Mitigation Plan 2018

    Unalaska Hazard Mitigation Plan 2018

    Unalaska, Alaska Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update April 2018 Prepared for: City of Unalaska and Qawalangin Tribe of Unalaska City of Unalaska Hazard Mitigation Plan THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY ii City of Unalaska Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Hazard Mitigation Planning ..................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Grant Programs with Mitigation Plan Requirements ............................... 1-1 1.2.1 HMA Unified Programs ............................................................... 1-2 2. Community Description ....................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Location, Geography, and History ........................................................... 2-1 2.2 Demographics .......................................................................................... 2-3 2.3 Economy .................................................................................................. 2-4 3. Planning Process .................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Planning Process Overview ..................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Hazard Mitigation Planning Team ........................................................... 3-3 3.3 Public Involvement & Opportunities for Interested Parties to participate ................................................................................................
  • Geology and Mineral Deposits of Jumbo Basin Southeastern Alaska

    Geology and Mineral Deposits of Jumbo Basin Southeastern Alaska

    Geology and Mineral Deposits of Jumbo Basin Southeastern Alaska GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 251 Geology and Mineral Deposits of Jumbo Basin Southeastern Alaska By GEORGE C. KENNEDY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 251 A discussion of the contact metamorphism, geomagnetic surveys, magnetite deposits, and iron ore reserves of part of Prince of Whales Island. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1953 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract. __________________________________________ 1 Contact metamorphism—Continued Introduction ______________________________________ 1 Metamorphism in the vicinity of the Magnetite Cliff Previous work. _ _ _______________________________ 1 bodies—Continued Present work- ________ 1 Metamorphism of the schists.________________ 20 Acknowledgments. ______________ _______________ 2 Metamorphism of the dike rocks._____________ 20 Geography__ _______________________________________ 2 Metamorphism in the vicinity of the upper magnetite Location and accessibility________________________ 2 bodies_ _______________________---_----_-_____ 21 Topography. ____________________________!______ 3 Exomorphism of the marble__________________ 21 Climate, water supply, and vegetation. ____________ 4 Endomorphism of the intrusive rocks__________ 22 History and production______________________________ 4 Metamorphism
  • Alaska Park Science Anchorage, Alaska

    Alaska Park Science Anchorage, Alaska

    National Park Service U.S. Department of Interior Alaska Regional Office Alaska Park Science Anchorage, Alaska PROCEEDINGS OF THE CentrCentralal AlaskAlaskaa PParkark SciencSciencee SymposiumSymposium SeptemberSeptember 12-14,12-14, 2006 2006 Denali Park, Alaska Volume 6, Issue 2 Parks featured in this Table of Contents issue of Alaska Park Science Keynote Address Alaska Parks in a Warming Climate: Conserving a Changing Future __________________________ 6 S K A Yukon-Charley Rivers Synthesis L A National Preserve Crossing Boundaries in Changing Environment: Norton Sound A A Synthesis __________________________________________12 Monitoring a Changing Climate Denali National Park and Preserve Long-term Air Quality Monitoring Wrangell-St. Elias in Denali National Park and Preserve __________________18 National Park and Preserve Monitoring Seasonal and Long-term Climate Changes and Extremes in the Central Alaska Network__________ 22 Physical Environment and Sciences Glacier Monitoring in Denali National Park and Preserve ________________________________________26 Applications of the Soil-Ecological Survey of Denali National Park and Preserve__________________31 Bristol Bay Gulf of Alaska Using Radiocarbon to Detect Change in Ecosystem Carbon Cycling in Response to Permafrost Thawing____34 A Baseline Study of Permafrost in the Toklat Basin, Denali National Park and Preserve ____________________37 Dinosauria and Fossil Aves Footprints from the Lower Cantwell Formation (latest Cretaceous), Denali National Park and Preserve ____________________41
  • Anchorage Service Area Profile

    Anchorage Service Area Profile

    Anchorage Service Area 2 OVERVIEW Alaska Native 2006 User Population. ANCHORAGE SERVICE AREA............................... 52,417 Aleutian/Pribilof Islands Association .......................... 1,124 Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation (part)..................... 620 Chickaloon ....................................................................... 14 Chitina.............................................................................. 36 Chugachmiut .............................................................. 2,751 Copper River Native Association ................................... 590 Eastern Aleutian Tribes .............................................. 1,075 Eklutna Native Association............................................... 18 Kenaitze Indian Tribe ................................................. 2,840 Knik .................................................................................... 0 Kodiak Area Native Association .................................. 2,140 Mt. Sanford Native Association ...................................... 143 Ninilchik Traditional Council .......................................... 122 Seldovia Withdrawal Area ............................................. 589 Southcentral Foundation ........................................... 40,003 St. George Traditional Council ......................................... 64 Tyonek Village................................................................ 175 Users are defined as beneficiaries who used a facility that reports through the Indian Health Service centralized
  • Historical Timeline for Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge

    Historical Timeline for Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge

    Historical Timeline Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge Much of the refuge has been protected as a national wildlife refuge for over a century, and we recognize that refuge lands are the ancestral homelands of Alaska Native people. Development of sophisticated tools and the abundance of coastal and marine wildlife have made it possible for people to thrive here for thousands of years. So many facets of Alaska’s history happened on the lands and waters of the Alaska Maritime Refuge that the Refuge seems like a time-capsule story of the state and the conservation of island wildlife: • Pre 1800s – The first people come to the islands, the Russian voyages of discovery, the beginnings of the fur trade, first rats and fox introduced to islands, Steller sea cow goes extinct. • 1800s – Whaling, America buys Alaska, growth of the fox fur industry, beginnings of the refuge. • 1900 to 1945 – Wildlife Refuge System is born and more land put in the refuge, wildlife protection increases through treaties and legislation, World War II rolls over the refuge, rats and foxes spread to more islands. The Aleutian Islands WWII National Monument designation recognizes some of these significant events and places. • 1945 to the present – Cold War bases built on refuge, nuclear bombs on Amchitka, refuge expands and protections increase, Aleutian goose brought back from near extinction, marine mammals in trouble. Refuge History - Pre - 1800 A World without People Volcanoes push up from the sea. Ocean levels fluctuate. Animals arrive and adapt to dynamic marine conditions as they find niches along the forming continent’s miles of coastline.
  • Open File Report No. 79-2 EVALUATION of the MINERAL RESOURCES of the PIPELINE CORRIDOR PHASES I and I1

    Open File Report No. 79-2 EVALUATION of the MINERAL RESOURCES of the PIPELINE CORRIDOR PHASES I and I1

    Evaluation of the mineral resources of the pipeline corridor, phases i and ii Item Type Technical Report Authors Robinson, M.S. and Metz, P.A. Citation Robinson, M.S. and Metz, P.A., 1979, Evaluation of the mineral resources of the pipeline corridor, phases i and ii: University of Alaska Mineral Industry Research Laboratory Open File 79-2, 272 p. Publisher University of Alaska Mineral Industry Research Laboratory Download date 10/10/2021 15:21:54 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/2135 Open File Report No. 79-2 EVALUATION OF THE MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE PIPELINE CORRIDOR PHASES I AND I1 M.S. Robinson G P.A. Metz 1979 EVALUATION OF THE MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE PIPELINE CORRIDOR PHASE I AND I1 Final Report Submitted. to U.S. Bureau of Mines Alaska Fie1 d Operations Center Juneau, A1 aska Grant No. 601 66180 June 1, 1979 Submitted by Mark S. Robinson and Paul A:Metz Mineral Industry Research Laboratory University of A1 as ka Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Summary and Conclusions . I_. I SectionI. Geology and Mineral Resources of the Valdez .-.7 I ::: quadrangle Previous Investigations 11 .,- Regional Geology and Petrology . 11 Structural Geology 20 Geochemistry 21 Mining Activity and Economic Geology 23 References Cited 26 Bibliography 2 9 Section 11. Geology and Mineral Resources of the Gul kana quadrangle Previous Investigations Regional Geology and Petrology Structural Geology Geoc hemi s try Mining Activity and Economic Geology References Cited Bi bl iography Section 111. Geology and Mineral Resources of the Mt. Hayes quadpang1 e ---- -- Previous Investigations 44 Regional Geology and Petrology 45 Structural Geology 52 Geochemi stry 53 Mining Activity and Economic Geology 55 References Cited - 60 Bibliography 64 .Section IV.
  • Alaska OCS Socioeconomic Studies Program

    Alaska OCS Socioeconomic Studies Program

    . i, WUOE (ixlw Technical Report Number 54 Volume 1 -, Alaska OCS Socioeconomic Studies Program Sponsor: Bureau of Land Management — Alaska Outer ‘ Bering–Normn Pwdeum Development Scenarios Sociocultural Syst~ms Analysis The United States Department of the Interior was designated by the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Lands Act of 1953 to carry out the majority of the Act’s provisions for administering the mineral leasing and develop- ment of offshore areas of the United States under federal jurisdiction. Within the Department, the Bureau of Land Management (ELM) has the responsibility to meet requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) as well as other legislation and regulations dealing with the effects of offshore development. In Alaska, unique cultural differences and climatic conditions create a need for developing addi- tional socioeconomic and environmental information to improve OCS deci- sion making at all governmental levels. In fulfillment of its federal responsibilities and with an awareness of these additional information needs, the BLM has initiated several investigative programs, one of which is the Alaska OCS Socioeconomic Studies Program (SESP). The Alaska OCS Socioeconomic Studies Program is a multi-year research effort which attempts to predict and evaluate the effects of Alaska OCS Petroleum Development upon the physical, social, and economic environ- ments within the state. The overall methodology is divided into three broad research components. The first component identifies an alterna- tive set of assumptions regarding the location, the nature, and the timing of future petroleum events and related activities. In this component, the program takes into account the particular needs of the petroleum industry and projects the human, technological, economic, and environmental offshore and onshore development requirements of the regional petroleum industry.
  • This Manuscript Has Been Reproduced from the Microfilm Master. UMI Films the Text Directly from the Original Or Copy Submitted

    This Manuscript Has Been Reproduced from the Microfilm Master. UMI Films the Text Directly from the Original Or Copy Submitted

    Returning: Twentieth century performances of the King Island Wolf Dance Item Type Thesis Authors Kingston, Deanna Marie Download date 09/10/2021 06:41:20 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/9533 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.