DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Impact Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Impact Assessment JANUARY 2010 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED LAND & HOUSING SUBDIVISION AT HOLLAND ESTATE, MARTHA BRAE TRELAWNY [Prepared for KENCASA Project Management & Construction Limited] CONRAD DOUGLAS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED 14 Carvalho Drive Kingston 10 Jamaica W.I. Telephone: 929-0023/0025/8824 Email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Website: www.cda-estech.com ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A LAND AND HOUSING SUBDIVISION AT HOLLAND ESTATE, MARTHA BRAE, TRELAWNY Rev. 01 Prepared for: KENCASA Construction and Project Management Limited Conrad Douglas & Associates LTD CD*PRJ 1091/09 Holland Estate Housing Subdivision EIA – KENCASA PROPRIETARY RESTRICTION NOTICE This document contains information proprietary to Conrad Douglas & Associates Limited (CD&A) and KENCASA Construction and Project Management Limited and shall not be reproduced or transferred to other documents, or disclosed to others, or used for any purpose other than that for which it is furnished without the prior written permission of CD&A. Further, this Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is the sole property of CD&A and KENCASA Construction and Project Management Limited and no portion of it shall be used in the formulation of now or in the future, by the agencies and/or persons who may see it in the process of its review, without written permission of CD&A and KENCASA Construction and Project Management Limited. Conrad Douglas & Associates Ltd. CD*PRJ 1091/09 Holland Estate Housing Subdivision EIA – KENCASA Table of Contents Table of Contents Page Number 1 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Introduction................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Objective & Concept ......................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Approach & Methodology ............................................................................................. 1-2 1.4 Applicable Policy, Legislative, Standards and Regulations ........................................... 1-2 1.5 Impact Identification & Mitigation ................................................................................ 1-2 1.5.1 Impact Mitigation .................................................................................................. 1-3 1.6 Environmental Management & Monitoring Plans ........................................................ 1-3 1.7 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.7.1 Recommendations ................................................................................................. 1-3 2 Project Description .............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Introduction................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Location .................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.2 Project Summary .................................................................................................... 2-2 2.2 Project Description ........................................................................................................ 2-8 2.2.1 Vision ...................................................................................................................... 2-8 2.2.2 Goals ...................................................................................................................... 2-8 2.2.3 Issues and Opportunities ....................................................................................... 2-9 2.3 Housing Plan .................................................................................................................. 2-9 2.3.1 Residential Types ................................................................................................... 2-9 2.4 Community Facilities Plan ........................................................................................... 2-14 2.4.1 Recreation ............................................................................................................ 2-14 2.4.2 Utilities ................................................................................................................. 2-15 2.4.3 Public Safety ......................................................................................................... 2-16 2.4.4 Healthcare ............................................................................................................ 2-16 2.4.5 Education ............................................................................................................. 2-16 2.4.6 Cultural ................................................................................................................. 2-17 2.5 Commercial District ..................................................................................................... 2-17 2.5.1 Quality of Success ................................................................................................ 2-17 2.6 Corridor Plan ............................................................................................................... 2-18 2.6.1 Wayfinding System .............................................................................................. 2-18 2.6.2 Street Network ..................................................................................................... 2-19 2.6.3 Parking ................................................................................................................. 2-19 2.7 Infrastructure .............................................................................................................. 2-19 2.7.1 Potable Water ...................................................................................................... 2-19 2.7.2 Electricity .............................................................................................................. 2-24 2.7.3 Landscaping .......................................................................................................... 2-24 2.7.4 Solid Waste Disposal ............................................................................................ 2-24 2.7.5 Roads .................................................................................................................... 2-25 2.7.6 Conservation Measures & Other Amenities ........................................................ 2-26 2.8 Drainage Design .......................................................................................................... 2-26 2.8.1 Method of Determining Design Peak Flows ........................................................ 2-28 Conrad Douglas & Associates Ltd. P a g e | i CD*PRJ 1091/09 Holland Estate Housing Subdivision EIA – KENCASA Table of Contents 2.8.2 Pre-Development Drainage Assessment ............................................................. 2-30 2.8.3 Post Development Drainage Assessment ............................................................ 2-34 2.9 Personnel Requirements ............................................................................................. 2-36 2.10 Sewage Waste Management ................................................................................... 2-36 2.10.1 Design References ................................................................................................ 2-38 2.10.2 Design Criteria ...................................................................................................... 2-38 2.10.3 Flow Calculations ................................................................................................. 2-38 2.10.4 Hydraulic Design .................................................................................................. 2-39 2.10.5 Sewage Pump Station .......................................................................................... 2-40 3 Analysis of Alternatives ........................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Introduction................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 The “No-Action” Alternative ......................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 The Proposed Development.......................................................................................... 3-1 3.4 Any Proposed Development Alternatives ..................................................................... 3-2 4 Policy, Legislative & Regulatory Framework ........................................................................ 4-1 4.1 Introduction................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Applicable Jamaican Policies, Legislations, Standards & Regulations .......................... 4-1 4.2.1 The NRCA Act, 1991 ............................................................................................... 4-1 4.2.2 The Watershed Protection Act, 1963 .................................................................... 4-4 4.2.3 The Wildlife Protection Act, 1945 .........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Louisiana by Vernon Antoine Brou Jr., 74320 Jack Loyd Road, Abita Springs, Louisiana 70420 Email: [email protected]
    Diphthera festiva (Fabricius, 1775) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Louisiana by Vernon Antoine Brou Jr., 74320 Jack Loyd Road, Abita Springs, Louisiana 70420 email: [email protected] a b c d e f Fig. 1. D. festiva phenotypes: (a-c) males, (d-f) females. The strikingly beautiful noctuid moth Diphthera festiva (Fabricius, 1775) (Figs. 1,3,5) appears to have been first recorded in Louisiana as an adult by Jung (1950). Prior to very recent times, this species was known as Noropsis hieroglyphica (Cramer) and has numerous other past synonymies involving both genus and species names. This species was described from Central and South America and according to Dunford & Barbara (2004) occurs through tropical and subtropical areas of South America (south to Bolivia and Brazil), Central America, North America (South Carolina to Florida and along the Gulf Coast). 70 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 35 number of adults 0 broods * * * * * * Fig 2. Adult D. festiva captured at sec.24T6SR12E, 4.2 mi. NE of Abita Springs, Louisiana. n = 1392 a b Fig. 3. Mature larvae of D. festiva (a - b). Fig. 4. Parish records for D. festiva. Fig. 5. Newly emerged adult D. festiva sitting upon it's cocoon. Chapin and Callahan (1967) reported festiva from mid-May to mid-November for the vicinity of Baton Rouge, Louisiana. In Louisiana, I have captured adult festiva yearly since the late 1960's to present year. The adult dates of capture range from late April till late November in six annual broods, the first peaking late May, and remaining broods peaking at about one-month intervals (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 2005? 2005 862 227251 Original Article PHYLOGENY OF NYMPHALINAE N. WAHLBERG ET AL Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 86, 227–251. With 5 figures . Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) NIKLAS WAHLBERG1*, ANDREW V. Z. BROWER2 and SÖREN NYLIN1 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331–2907, USA Received 10 January 2004; accepted for publication 12 November 2004 We infer for the first time the phylogenetic relationships of genera and tribes in the ecologically and evolutionarily well-studied subfamily Nymphalinae using DNA sequence data from three genes: 1450 bp of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (in the mitochondrial genome), 1077 bp of elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-a) and 400–403 bp of wing- less (both in the nuclear genome). We explore the influence of each gene region on the support given to each node of the most parsimonious tree derived from a combined analysis of all three genes using Partitioned Bremer Support. We also explore the influence of assuming equal weights for all characters in the combined analysis by investigating the stability of clades to different transition/transversion weighting schemes. We find many strongly supported and stable clades in the Nymphalinae. We are also able to identify ‘rogue’
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Phylogeny of the Neotropical Butterfly Genus Anartia
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26 (2003) 46–55 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A molecular phylogeny of the neotropical butterfly genus Anartia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Michael J. Blum,a,b,* Eldredge Bermingham,b and Kanchon Dasmahapatrab,c a Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA b Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Naos Island Molecular Laboratories, Unit 0948, APO-AA 34002-0948, Panama, FL, USA c Department of Biology, Galton Laboratory, University College, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, UK Received 2 August 2001; received in revised form 17 June 2002 Abstract While Anartia butterflies have served as model organisms for research on the genetics of speciation, no phylogeny has been published to describe interspecific relationships. Here, we present a molecular phylogenetic analysis of Anartia species relationships, using both mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Analyses of both data sets confirm earlier predictions of sister species pairings based primarily on genital morphology. Yet both the mitochondrial and nuclear gene phylogenies demonstrate that Anartia jatrophae is not sister to all other Anartia species, but rather that it is sister to the Anartia fatima–Anartia amathea lineage. Traditional bi- ogeographic explanations for speciation across the genus relied on A. jatrophae being sister to its congeners. These explanations invoked allopatric divergence of sister species pairs and multiple sympatric speciation events to explain why A. jatrophae flies alongside all its congeners. The molecular phylogenies are more consistent with lineage divergence due to vicariance, and range expansion of A. jatrophae to explain its sympatry with congeners. Further interpretations of the tree topologies also suggest how morphological evolution and eco-geographic adaptation may have set species range boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) with Descriptions of 5 New Species and 2 New Subspecies
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeysRevision 9: 97-134of the (2009)New World Panthea Hübner with descriptions of 5 new species and 2 new subspecies 97 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.9.157 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Revision of the New World Panthea Hübner (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) with descriptions of 5 new species and 2 new subspecies Gary G. Anweiler E.H. Strickland Entomological Museum, 218 Earth Sciences Building, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E9 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:87B63195-32B4-4FAF-8732-54242BF1FAA9 Corresponding author: Gary G. Anweiler ([email protected]) Academic editor: B. Christian Schmidt | Received 12 January 2009 | Accepted 23 April 2009 | Published 12 May 2009 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:20B00870-7416-4583-ADE0-4302E5571B66 Citation: Anweiler GG (2009) Revision of the New World Panthea Hübner (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) with descriptions of 5 new species and 2 new subspecies. In: Schmidt BC, Lafontaine JD (Eds) Contributions to the Systematics of New World Macro-Moths. ZooKeys 9: 97-134. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.9.157 Abstract Th e New World species of Panthea Hübner are revised. Five species and two subspecies are described as new: Panthea apanthea sp. n., Panthea reducta sp. n., Panthea greyi sp. n., Panthea judyae sp. n., Panthea guatemala sp. n., Panthea furcilla australis ssp. n., and Panthea acronyctoides nigra ssp. n. Lectotypes are designated for Panthea leucomelana Morrison and Panthea furcilla (Packard), and a neotype is designated for Platycerura gigantea French. Panthea pallescens McDunnough, syn. n. is synonymized with P.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico Border
    Thirteenth Report of the Good Neighbor Environmental Board to the President and Congress of the United States June 2010 English and Spanish versions available This report was published in English and Spanish. The original text was written in English and translated thereafter; any disputed meaning should refer back to the English version. A Blueprint for Action on the U.S.-Mexico Border Thirteenth Report of the Good Neighbor Environmental Board to the President and Congress of the United States June 2010 About the Board The Good Neighbor Environmental Board is an independent U.S. Presidential advisory committee that was created in 1992 under the Enterprise for the Americas Initiative Act, Public Law 102-532. It operates under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), and its mission is to advise the President and Congress of the United States on “good neighbor” environmental and infrastructure practices along the U.S. border with Mexico. The Board does not carry out border-region environmental activities of its own, nor does it have a budget to fund border projects. Rather, its unique role is to step back as an expert, nonpartisan advisor to the President and Congress and recommend how the federal government can most effectively work with its many partners to improve the environment along the U.S.­ Mexico border. Under Presidential Executive Order 12916, its administrative activities were assigned to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and are carried out by the EPA Offi ce of Cooperative Environmental Management (OCEM). Membership on the Board is extremely diverse. It includes senior officials from a number of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of the Old World Genera Panthea Hübner
    Zootaxa 3746 (3): 422–438 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3746.3.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6574FEDD-34A6-48ED-99D7-7D212BA85F61 Revision of the Old World genera Panthea Hübner, [1820] 1816 and Pantheana Hreblay, 1998 with description two new species from China (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae: Pantheinae). Revision of Pantheinae, contribution IX G. BEHOUNEK,1 H.L. HAN2 & V.S. KONONENKO3,4 1D-85567 Grafing/Munich, Sudetenstrasse 6, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 2 School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, CH-150014 China. E-mail: [email protected] 3Laboratory of Entomology, Institute of Biology and Soil Science Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, RF-690022 Vladivostok, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 4Corresponding author Abstract The Old World species of the genus Panthea Hübner [1820] 1816 are revised. The article contains the description of two new species Panthea fuscogrisea sp. n. and Panthea florianii sp. n. from continental China and re-description of two spe- cies P. ro be r t i Joannis 1928 and P. grisea Wileman, 1919 with illustration of male and female genitalia. Diphthera hoenei Draudt, 1950 (syn. n.) is synonymised with P. rober ti Joannis 1928. The species Panthea ronnyi Thony, 1996 is excluded from the genus Panthea. Lectotypes for Diphthera hoenei and Panthea roberti are designated. The genus includes five species in the Old World, distributed mainly in Sino-Himalayan subregion of the Palaearctic.
    [Show full text]
  • BUTTERFLIES in Thewest Indies of the Caribbean
    PO Box 9021, Wilmington, DE 19809, USA E-mail: [email protected]@focusonnature.com Phone: Toll-free in USA 1-888-721-3555 oror 302/529-1876302/529-1876 BUTTERFLIES and MOTHS in the West Indies of the Caribbean in Antigua and Barbuda the Bahamas Barbados the Cayman Islands Cuba Dominica the Dominican Republic Guadeloupe Jamaica Montserrat Puerto Rico Saint Lucia Saint Vincent the Virgin Islands and the ABC islands of Aruba, Bonaire, and Curacao Butterflies in the Caribbean exclusively in Trinidad & Tobago are not in this list. Focus On Nature Tours in the Caribbean have been in: January, February, March, April, May, July, and December. Upper right photo: a HISPANIOLAN KING, Anetia jaegeri, photographed during the FONT tour in the Dominican Republic in February 2012. The genus is nearly entirely in West Indian islands, the species is nearly restricted to Hispaniola. This list of Butterflies of the West Indies compiled by Armas Hill Among the butterfly groupings in this list, links to: Swallowtails: family PAPILIONIDAE with the genera: Battus, Papilio, Parides Whites, Yellows, Sulphurs: family PIERIDAE Mimic-whites: subfamily DISMORPHIINAE with the genus: Dismorphia Subfamily PIERINAE withwith thethe genera:genera: Ascia,Ascia, Ganyra,Ganyra, Glutophrissa,Glutophrissa, MeleteMelete Subfamily COLIADINAE with the genera: Abaeis, Anteos, Aphrissa, Eurema, Kricogonia, Nathalis, Phoebis, Pyrisitia, Zerene Gossamer Wings: family LYCAENIDAE Hairstreaks: subfamily THECLINAE with the genera: Allosmaitia, Calycopis, Chlorostrymon, Cyanophrys,
    [Show full text]
  • De La República De Cuba
    ISSN 1682-7511 DE LA REPÚBLICA DE CUBA MINISTERIO DE JUSTICIA EDICIÓN ORDINARIA LA HABANA, JUEVES 4 DE AGOSTO DE 2011 AÑO CIX Sitio Web: http://www.gacetaoficial.cu/ — Calle Zanja No. 352 esquina a Escobar, Centro Habana Teléfonos: 878-3849, 878-4435 y 873-7962 Número 26 Página 723 Gaceta Oficial No. 026 Ordinaria de xx de xxxxxxxx de 2011 MINISTERIOS conformidad con lo dispuesto en el artículo 24 de la Ley del ______ Medio Ambiente. CIENCIA, TECNOLOGÍA Y MEDIO POR CUANTO: Un antecedente importante en el con- AMBIENTE trol de las especies, ha sido la entrada en vigor de la Resolu- ción No. 111 de 14 de octubre de 1996 “Regulaciones sobre RESOLUCIÓN No. 160/2011 la diversidad biológica” con el fin de lograr una gestión POR CUANTO: Por Acuerdo del Consejo de Estado de adecuada en la conservación y utilización sostenible de la 2 de marzo de 2009 quien resuelve fue designado Ministro diversidad biológica en el país. No obstante se hace necesa- del Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología y Medio Ambiente. rio establecer regulaciones adicionales para las especies de POR CUANTO: El Acuerdo No. 4002 adoptado por el especial significación, a las que se les aplique un régimen Comité Ejecutivo del Consejo de Ministros con fecha 24 de similar al establecido por la antes mencionada resolución, abril de 2001, establece en su Apartado Segundo, numeral sin que ello implique la derogación de la misma. trece, que el Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología y Medio POR TANTO: En ejercicio de las facultades que me están Ambiente es el Organismo de la Administración Central
    [Show full text]
  • The Land and Fresh-Water Mollusks of Puerto Rico
    MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, NO. 70 THE LAND AND FRESH-WATER MOLLUSKS OF PUERTO RICO BY HENRY VAN DER SCHALIE ANN ARBOR UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN PRESS AUGUST12, 1948 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, NO. 70 THE LAND AND FRESH-WATER MOLLUSKS OF PUERTO RICO BY HENRY VAN DER SCHALIE ANN ARBOR UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN PRESS AUGUST12, 1948 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.............. -... 9 Acknowledgments 10 ILLUSTRATIONS PLATES (Plates I-XITT follo~vpage 128) PLATE Francisco Mariaiio YagBn (front~spiece). I. FIG. 1. Alcadia striata (Lamnrck). FIG. a. Alcadia ILjulnlarsoni (Pfeiffer). FIG. 3. Alcadia ulta (Sowerby). FIa. 4. Helicina pl~asinnella " Sowel.by ' ' Pfeiff er. Fra. 5. Lucidella winosa (Sliuttle~vorth). PIG. 6. Lucidclla umbonuta (5huttlewortl1). FIa. 7. Pad?/enin portoricensis (Pfeiffer). FIG. 8. Ccrutoth.cc~isportoricanus Pilsbry and Vanatta. l17ra. 9. Stoaston~ops~U.C~~O~LC(LPLU $1. lj. 1l:lkcr. F1a. 10. Stoastonlops boriqucni 11. 13. Balter. 11. Fra. 1. Megalomastoma o'oceum (Ginelin). Fra. 2. Megalomasto?na werruculosum Sliuttlcworth. FIG. Licina decttssata (Lamarck). FIG. Licina aguadillensis (Pfeiffer) . FIG. Licina granainosa H. B. Baker. Fro. Chondropoma riisei (Pfeiffer). Fra. Chondropoma blauneri (Shuttleworth). Fra. Cl~ondropomaconseptum (von Martens). FIa. Chondropoma yunquei H. B. Baker. FIG. Chondroporna swifti (Sh~ttleworth). 111. FIG. 1. Pupi8,oma minus Pilsbry. FIG. 2. Pupison~adioscoricola (C. B. Adams). FIG. 3. Bothriopupa tenuidens (C. B. Adams). FIG. 4. Pupoides nitidulus (Pfeiffer) . FIG. 5. Gastrocopta sc.rwilis (Gould). FIG. 6. Gnstrocoptn prllncidn (Pfciffcr). Fra. 7. Guppya pi?~dlachi(Pf~iffer) . Fla. 8. Habroconcts cf. ernsti (Jousseaume). FIa. 9. Hau~aiia~tlinrrsc~rla (I%inney).
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Philaethria Dido Species Complex (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Heliconiinae) and Description of Three New Sibling Species from Colombia and Venezuela
    Zootaxa 2720: 1–27 (2010) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2010 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A review of the Philaethria dido species complex (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Heliconiinae) and description of three new sibling species from Colombia and Venezuela LUIS MIGUEL CONSTANTINO1 & JULIAN A. SALAZAR2 1Museo Entomológico Marcial Benavides, Disciplina de Entomología, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones de Café, Cenicafé, Km 4 via a Manizales, Chinchiná, Caldas, Colombia. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Three new species and seven new subspecies of Philaethria from Colombia, Venezuela, and Panama are described as follows: P. browni sp. nov., P, romeroi sp. nov., P. neildi neildi sp. nov., P. neildi winhardi spp. nov., P. neildi tachiraensis spp. nov., P. dido panamensis ssp. nov., P. andrei orinocensis ssp. nov., P. ostara araguensis ssp. nov., P. ostara meridensis ssp. nov., and P. pygmalion metaensis ssp. nov. The three new sibling species are diagnosed using characters of maculation on the ventral surface of the wing, male genitalia, and chromosome numbers. New records of P. andrei from Venezuela and P. dido from Panama are reported. The adults (both dorsal and ventral surface) are illustrated for all the species and subspecies and information about habitats and behavior for each species is provided with a key to identify the species known in the Neotropical Region. Key words: Lepidoptera, Philaethria, new species, systematics, neotropics Introduction This is the first revision of the genus Philaethria (Billberg, 1820) resolving taxonomic problems with similar related sibling species occurring sympatrically with P.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Lower Rio Grande Valley and Santa Ana National Wildlife
    Final Lower Rio Grande Valley and Santa Ana National Wildlife Refuges Comprehensive Conservation Plan September 1997 (Reprint March 1999) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cover Artwork by Brian Cobble Table of Contents VISION........................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary................................................................................................................... 6 1.0 Introduction and Regional Setting................................................................................. 8 1.1 LRGV Challenges............................................................................................... 8 2.0 Planning Perspectives and Considerations................................................................ 9 2.1 National Wildlife Refuge System ................................................................... 9 2.2 The Service & Ecosystem Management ...................................................... 9 2.3 Refuge Complex and Management Districts........................................... 10 2.4 Laguna Atascosa NWR -- A Partner with LRGV NWR............................ 10 2.5 Planning Perspectives.................................................................................... 10 2.6 The Issues.......................................................................................................... 11 2.7 The Need for Action........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    a Proceedings of the United States National Museum SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION • WASHINGTON, D.C. Volume 121 1967 Number 3579 VALID ZOOLOGICAL NAMES OF THE PORTLAND CATALOGUE By Harald a. Rehder Research Curator, Division of Mollusks Introduction An outstanding patroness of the arts and sciences in eighteenth- century England was Lady Margaret Cavendish Bentinck, Duchess of Portland, wife of William, Second Duke of Portland. At Bulstrode in Buckinghamshire, magnificent summer residence of the Dukes of Portland, and in her London house in Whitehall, Lady Margaret— widow for the last 23 years of her life— entertained gentlemen in- terested in her extensive collection of natural history and objets d'art. Among these visitors were Sir Joseph Banks and Daniel Solander, pupil of Linnaeus. As her own particular interest was in conchology, she received from both of these men many specimens of shells gathered on Captain Cook's voyages. Apparently Solander spent considerable time working on the conchological collection, for his manuscript on descriptions of new shells was based largely on the "Portland Museum." When Lady Margaret died in 1785, her "Museum" was sold at auction. The task of preparing the collection for sale and compiling the sales catalogue fell to the Reverend John Lightfoot (1735-1788). For many years librarian and chaplain to the Duchess and scientif- 1 2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol. 121 ically inclined with a special leaning toward botany and conchology, he was well acquainted with the collection. It is not surprising he went to considerable trouble to give names and figure references to so many of the mollusks and other invertebrates that he listed.
    [Show full text]