DOCSLIB.ORG

Intensive Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intensive Survey INTENSIVE SURVEY WESTLAKE RECOVERY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA CITY OF LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA June 15, 2009 INTENSIVE SURVEY WESTLAKE RECOVERY REDEVELOPMENT AREA CITY OF LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Ken Moye, Senior Planner City of Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency, Hollywood and Central Region 3055 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 520 Los Angeles, California 90010 Prepared by: Tanya Rathbun Sorrell, M.A.; Bill Bell; and Casey Tibbet, M.A. LSA Associates, Inc. 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200 Riverside, California 92507 LSA Project No. CAX0701 June 15, 2009 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. INTENSIVE SURVEY JUNE 2009 WESTLAKE RECOVERY REDEVELOPMENT AREA CITY OF LOS ANGELES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) is under contract to Chattel Architecture, Preservation, and Planning (Chattel) who is the prime consultant under contract to the City of Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) to conduct an intensive-level survey of three Community Redevelopment Areas. LSA is responsible for the Westlake Recovery Redevelopment Area (Westlake), while Chattel is responsible for the Hollywood Redevelopment Project Area (Hollywood) and PCR Services Corporation (PCR), a second subconsultant, is responsible for the Wilshire Center/Koreatown Recovery Redevelopment Area (Wilshire/Koreatown). The Westlake survey area comprises 633 acres and roughly 1,522 assessor’s parcels in an area surrounding MacArthur Park, bounded by Olympic Boulevard to the south, 3rd Street and Beverly Boulevard to the north, Hoover and Benton Streets to the west, and Witmer Street to the east. The project area was created in the aftermath of the civil unrest of 1992 as part of a larger area targeted for recovery and revitalization. The purpose of the survey, completed in cooperation with the City of Los Angeles Office of Historic Resources (OHR), was to identify, document, and evaluate, at the intensive level, all properties 45 years of age or older for eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places (National Register), California Register of Historical Resources (California Register), and/or for designation as a City of Los Angeles Historic Cultural Monument (HCM) to facilitate future planning considerations. All three project teams coordinated with methodology under development for SurveyLA, the City’s first comprehensive historic resources survey. In the spring and summer of 2008, the survey team conducted windshield surveys and archival research to prepare a historic context statement, which identified significant themes and eligibility criteria. A draft of the historic context statement was reviewed by the other two CRA survey teams, CRA Project Managers, and Janet Hansen, Deputy Manager of OHR. In the fall and winter of 2008– 2009, the survey team conducted an intensive-level survey. Of the approximately 1,522 unique parcels within the survey area, 977 were digitally photographed and surveyed using the Historic Architecture Inventory (HAI), a field collection application and database custom-designed by LSA for the CRA surveys. Field maps showing the location and status of each documented property are attached as Appendix A. LSA photographed all properties constructed in 1965 and earlier, prepared descriptions for all of the properties that retained integrity, and conducted property-specific research on intact properties that appeared to be significant. Each of the surveyed properties was assigned a California Historical Resources status code according to level of significance. Of the 977 properties documented during the current survey, 4 properties were not visible from the public right-of-way and require special access before they can be evaluated (California Historical Resources [CHR] status code 7R). There were 32 properties that had been previously designated or determined eligible for designation, including 4 properties listed in the National and California Registers (CHR status code 1S), 9 properties that were formally determined eligible for the National and California Registers (CHR status code 2S), 10 properties that had been determined eligible for the National Register through a previous survey (CHR status code 3S), and 15 designated Los Angeles HCMs (CHR status code 5S1).1 These 32 properties were photographed and updated. 1 Eight of the designated HCMs have also been designated/determined eligible for the National Register and are also included in the totals for 1S and 2S. R:\CAX0701\REPORT\Report.doc (6/15/2009) i LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. INTENSIVE SURVEY JUNE 2009 WESTLAKE RECOVERY REDEVELOPMENT AREA CITY OF LOS ANGELES Of the properties that LSA fully surveyed, 163 appear to be eligible for listing in the National/California Registers (3S), and 58 appear eligible for the California Register, but not National Register (3CS). These 211 resources would also be eligible for designation as Los Angeles Historic Cultural Monuments. Another 63 properties are contributors to a potential National Register Historic District (3D) and, within that district, 8 properties were also individually eligible (3B). One apartment complex (Belmont Square) was documented as a California Register-eligible historic district because it was composed of several parcels (37 total), but for the purposes of evaluation should be considered one property. There was one property that was determined eligible exclusively for designation as an HCM, Langer’s Delicatessen (5S3). This amounts to 354 historical resources for the purposes of CEQA, 32 that were previously determined significant at one or more levels and 322 that as a result of this survey appear eligible for listing in the National or California registers or for designation as an HCM. The other 619 properties surveyed were determined to be ineligible for the National Register, California Register, or for designation as an LA HCM under any criteria (CHR status codes 6Z, 6DQ, and 6L). These properties are not “historical resources” under CEQA; however, 154 6DQ properties and 102 6L properties may warrant special consideration in local planning efforts. A master table, summarizing the results of the survey and listing the 977 properties documented in order by address, is attached to this report as Appendix B. Additional information is stored in the HAI database, which was conveyed to the CRA GIS specialists for inclusion in the CRA historic properties database. At CRA’s direction, this information will also be transmitted to the OHR for inclusion in the SurveyLA database. DPR forms (Primary and Building, Structure, Object [BSO] records) for significant individual properties were also printed from the database and are attached to this report as Appendix C. Primary records for historic district contributors have been printed, attached to an appropriate District Record, and attached to this report as Appendix D. All properties assigned a status code of 1–5 are considered to be “historical resources” for CEQA compliance purposes and City’s Cultural Heritage Ordinance. Those properties assigned a status code of 6DQ, 6Z or 6L do not constitute “historic properties” (Section 106) or “historical resources” (CEQA) and require no further cultural resources considerations. R:\CAX0701\REPORT\Report.doc (6/15/2009) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................iii FIGURES AND TABLES...................................................................................................................... v INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 PROJECT METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................... 3 ARCHIVAL RESEARCH...............................................................................................................3 FIELD SURVEY ............................................................................................................................. 3 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA................................................................................................................. 4 NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES ....................................................................... 4 CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES ...................................................... 6 CITY OF LOS ANGELES HISTORIC CULTURAL MONUMENT (HCM) ............................... 6 CITY OF LOS ANGELES HISTORIC PRESERVATION OVERLAY ZONE (HPOZ) .............. 7 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL RESOURCE (CHR) STATUS CODES......................................... 7 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW.................................................................................................................. 8 WESTLAKE’S BEGINNINGS, 1857–1910 ................................................................................... 8 DESTINATION WESTLAKE, 1906–1930 .................................................................................. 12 LATER DEVELOPMENT, 1970–1995 ........................................................................................ 21 HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT ............................................................................................... 25 CONTEXT: RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, 1887–1910 .....................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FIGUEROA 865 South Figueroa, Los Angeles, California
    FIGUEROA 865 South Figueroa, Los Angeles, California E T PAU The Westin INGRAHAM ST S Bonaventure Hotel W W 7TH S 4T H ST T S FREMONT AV FINANCIAL Jonathan Club DISTRICT ST W 5TH ST IGUEROA S FLOWER ST Los Angeles ISCO ST L ST S F E OR FWY Central Library RB HA FRANC The California Club S BIX WILSHIR W 8TH ST W 6 E B TH ST LVD Pershing Square Fig at 7th 7th St/ Metro Center Pershing E T Square S AV O D COC ST N S TheThe BLOCBLO R FWY I RA C N ANCA S G HARBO R W 9TH ST F Figueroa HIS IVE ST Los Angeles, CA L O DOW S W 8T 8T H STS T W 6 TH S T S HILL ST W S OLY A MPIC B OOA ST R LVD FIGUE W 9 S ER ST TH ST W O W 7 L Y 7 A TTHH ST S F W S D T LEGENDAADWAY O FIDM/Fashion R Nokia Theatre L.A. LIVE BROB S Metro Station T W Institute of Design S OLYMPI G ST Light Rail StationIN & Merchandising R PPR C BLVD Green SpacesS S T Sites of Interest SST STAPLES Center IN SOUTH PARK ST MA E Parking S IV L S O LA Convention Center E W 1 L ST 1 ND AV Property Description Figueroa is a 35-storey, 692,389 sq ft granite and reflective glass office tower completed in 1991 that is located at the southwest corner of Figueroa Street and 8th Place in Downtown Los Angeles, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments
    Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments No. Name Address CHC No. CF No. Adopted Community Plan Area CD Notes 1 Leonis Adobe 23537 Calabasas Road 08/06/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 3 Woodland Hills - West Hills 2 Bolton Hall 10116 Commerce Avenue & 7157 08/06/1962 Sunland - Tujunga - Lake View 7 Valmont Street Terrace - Shadow Hills - East La Tuna Canyon 3 Plaza Church 535 North Main Street and 100-110 08/06/1962 Central City 14 La Iglesia de Nuestra Cesar Chavez Avenue Señora la Reina de Los Angeles (The Church of Our Lady the Queen of Angels) 4 Angel's Flight 4th Street & Hill Street 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Dismantled May 1969; Moved to Hill Street between 3rd Street and 4th Street, February 1996 5 The Salt Box 339 South Bunker Hill Avenue (Now 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Moved from 339 Hope Street) South Bunker Hill Avenue (now Hope Street) to Heritage Square; destroyed by fire 1969 6 Bradbury Building 300-310 South Broadway and 216- 09/21/1962 Central City 14 224 West 3rd Street 7 Romulo Pico Adobe (Rancho 10940 North Sepulveda Boulevard 09/21/1962 Mission Hills - Panorama City - 7 Romulo) North Hills 8 Foy House 1335-1341 1/2 Carroll Avenue 09/21/1962 Silver Lake - Echo Park - 1 Elysian Valley 9 Shadow Ranch House 22633 Vanowen Street 11/02/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 12 Woodland Hills - West Hills 10 Eagle Rock Eagle Rock View Drive, North 11/16/1962 Northeast Los Angeles 14 Figueroa (Terminus), 72-77 Patrician Way, and 7650-7694 Scholl Canyon Road 11 The Rochester (West Temple 1012 West Temple Street 01/04/1963 Westlake 1 Demolished February Apartments) 14, 1979 12 Hollyhock House 4800 Hollywood Boulevard 01/04/1963 Hollywood 13 13 Rocha House 2400 Shenandoah Street 01/28/1963 West Adams - Baldwin Hills - 10 Leimert City of Los Angeles May 5, 2021 Page 1 of 60 Department of City Planning No.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study of NETRA
    Network Protocols and Algorithms ISSN 1943-3581 2016, Vo l . 8, No. 4 Internet Traffic Surveillance & Network Monitoring in India: Case Study of NETRA Rajan Gupta Dept. of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, University of Delhi 1st Floor, North Campus, Delhi – 110007, India E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Sunil Kumar Muttoo Dept. of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, University of Delhi 1st Floor, North Campus, Delhi – 110007, India Received: October 20, 2016 Accepted: December 30, 2016 Published: December 31, 2016 DOI: 10.5296/npa.v8i4.10179 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/npa.v8i4.10179 Abstract Internet traffic surveillance is gaining importance in today’s digital world. Lots of international agencies are putting in efforts to monitor the network around their countries to see suspicious activities and illegal or illegitimate transmission of messages. India, being a center of attraction for terrorist activities, is also working towards development of such surveillance systems. NETRA or Network Traffic Analysis is one such effort being taken by the Indian Government to filter suspicious keywords from messages in the network. But is it good enough to be used at highest level for security analysis or does the system design needs to be improved as compared to other similar systems around the world; this question is answered through this study. The comparison of NETRA is done against Dish Fire, Prism and Echelon. The design of the NETRA scheme and implementation level analysis of the system shows few weaknesses like limited memory options, limited channels for monitoring, pre-set filters, ignoring big data demands, security concerns, social values breach and ignoring ethical issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Advocating for Basic Constitutional Search Protections to Apply to Cell Phones from Eavesdropping and Tracking by Government and Corporate Entities
    University of Central Florida STARS HIM 1990-2015 2013 Brave New World Reloaded: Advocating for Basic Constitutional Search Protections to Apply to Cell Phones from Eavesdropping and Tracking by Government and Corporate Entities Mark Berrios-Ayala University of Central Florida Part of the Legal Studies Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses1990-2015 University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in HIM 1990-2015 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Berrios-Ayala, Mark, "Brave New World Reloaded: Advocating for Basic Constitutional Search Protections to Apply to Cell Phones from Eavesdropping and Tracking by Government and Corporate Entities" (2013). HIM 1990-2015. 1519. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses1990-2015/1519 BRAVE NEW WORLD RELOADED: ADVOCATING FOR BASIC CONSTITUTIONAL SEARCH PROTECTIONS TO APPLY TO CELL PHONES FROM EAVESDROPPING AND TRACKING BY THE GOVERNMENT AND CORPORATE ENTITIES by MARK KENNETH BERRIOS-AYALA A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors in the Major Program in Legal Studies in the College of Health and Public Affairs and in The Burnett Honors College at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Fall Term 2013 Thesis Chair: Dr. Abby Milon ABSTRACT Imagine a world where someone’s personal information is constantly compromised, where federal government entities AKA Big Brother always knows what anyone is Googling, who an individual is texting, and their emoticons on Twitter.
    [Show full text]
  • Lonworks® Platform Revision 2
    Introduction to the LonWorks® Platform revision 2 ® 078-0183-01B Echelon, LON, LonWorks, LonMark, NodeBuilder, , LonTalk, Neuron, 3120, 3150, LNS, i.LON, , ShortStack, LonMaker, the Echelon logo, and are trademarks of Echelon Corporation registered in the United States and other countries. LonSupport, , , OpenLDV, Pyxos, LonScanner, LonBridge, and Thinking Inside the Box are trademarks of Echelon Corporation. Other trademarks belong to their respective holders. Neuron Chips, Smart Transceivers, and other OEM Products were not designed for use in equipment or systems which involve danger to human health or safety or a risk of property damage and Echelon assumes no responsibility or liability for use of the Neuron Chips in such applications. Parts manufactured by vendors other than Echelon and referenced in this document have been described for illustrative purposes only, and may not have been tested by Echelon. It is the responsibility of the customer to determine the suitability of these parts for each application. ECHELON MAKES AND YOU RECEIVE NO WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS, EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY OR IN ANY COMMUNICATION WITH YOU, AND ECHELON SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of Echelon Corporation. Printed in the United States of America. Copyright
    [Show full text]
  • A Failure of Intelligence: the Echelon Interception System & the Fundamental Right to Privacy in Europe
    Pace International Law Review Volume 14 Issue 2 Fall 2002 Article 7 September 2002 Post-Sept. 11th International Surveillance Activity - A Failure of Intelligence: The Echelon Interception System & the Fundamental Right to Privacy in Europe Kevin J. Lawner Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pilr Recommended Citation Kevin J. Lawner, Post-Sept. 11th International Surveillance Activity - A Failure of Intelligence: The Echelon Interception System & the Fundamental Right to Privacy in Europe, 14 Pace Int'l L. Rev. 435 (2002) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pilr/vol14/iss2/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace International Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POST-SEPT. 11TH INTERNATIONAL SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITY - A FAILURE OF INTELLIGENCE: THE ECHELON INTERCEPTION SYSTEM & THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN EUROPE Kevin J. Lawner* I. Introduction ....................................... 436 II. Communications Intelligence & the United Kingdom - United States Security Agreement ..... 443 A. September 11th - A Failure of Intelligence .... 446 B. The Three Warning Flags ..................... 449 III. The Echelon Interception System .................. 452 A. The Menwith Hill and Bad Aibling Interception Stations .......................... 452 B. Echelon: The Abuse of Power .................. 454 IV. Anti-Terror Measures in the Wake of September 11th ............................................... 456 V. Surveillance Activity and the Fundamental Right to Privacy in Europe .............................. 460 A. The United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union... 464 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Regionl Connector Transit Corridor Draft DEIS/DEIR
    Regional Connector Transit Corridor Cultural Resources – Built Environment Technical Memorandum were designed to legally and financially assist cities to address problems of decay and neglect within their communities. In response to this new legislation, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles (CRA) was established in 1948, in part to cure economic "blight" by funding and overseeing redevelopment. As its first major project, the CRA sought to improve the Bunker Hill area, which had been one of the more exclusive residential neighborhoods at the turn of the twentieth century but had deteriorated and fallen out of fashion. Despite many proposals, plans to redevelop Bunker Hill were rejected, and ultimately not begun until the 1960s, when large hotels and Victorian-era homes were bulldozed and the landforms were rearranged. Slowly, over the past 50 years, a community of high-rises has been constructed in their place (Kawaratani 2008). When the Harbor Freeway (Interstate-110) was completed in 1952, it was hopefully called “downtown’s new Main Street” by noted local architect A. C. Martin, Jr. (Los Angeles Times 1967). Construction of the freeway and the repeal of the building height ordinance in 1954 created a significant new concentration of high- and midrise buildings, eventually concentrated on Figueroa and 7th Streets. The downtown civic center began to take shape in the post-war era. As discussed in California: A Land of Contrast: Business blocks of the late nineteenth century have been replaced by the Civic Center, whose buildings, most of contemporary design, are flanked by multi-acre parking lots. The Civic Center has encroached westward upon Bunker Hill, once occupied by the city’s wealthier residents and now experiencing impressive [redevelopment] (Lantis, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • DLANC Planning 601 W 7Th St.Pdf
    ATTACHMENT “A” REQUEST FOR DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL L.A.M.C. §12.24 M Chipotle Mexican Grill Store #1500 601 W. 7th St. Los Angeles Chipotle Mexican Grill (Chipotle Mexican Grill, LLC, d/b/a Chipotle Mexican Grill, (“the Applicant” and/or “Chipotle”) is seeking the following discretionary approval: Pursuant to L.A.M.C. Section 12.24 M, the Applicant requests a Plan Approval for the continued sale and/or dispensing of alcohol for on-site consumption in connection with an existing 104-seat, 3,042 s.f. restaurant with hours of operation from 10:30 a.m. to 10 p.m. daily, located on a 10,463 s.f. lot in the C2-4D zone. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant, Chipotle, is requesting a Plan Approval to permit the continued service of a full line of alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption at its existing location at 601 W. 7th St. in Downtown Los Angeles (“Site”). Chipotle opened in March 2011, and has served beer since its opening date pursuant to Case No. ZA 2010- 2296 (CUB) ("Existing Approval"), which approved the restaurant to serve a full line of alcoholic beverages. The restaurant is 3,042 s.f. and provides 104 indoor seats. The Applicant currently holds a type 41 ABC license (beer and wine), but would continue to like the operational flexibility to upgrade the license in order to add margaritas to its offerings at a future date. The request herein is only a renewal and is purely operational in nature. The Applicant believes that its request for a Plan Approval for the continued service of alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption along with meals at its “fast casual” Mexican-style restaurant is warranted based upon the company’s outstanding record of compliance with the California Department of Alcoholic Beverages (“ABC”), the appropriateness of the location for the requested use, and its overall reputation as a well-established, responsible company which can be trusted to manage the requested ABC license appropriately.
    [Show full text]
  • Manuel Pastor, Jr
    C U R R I C U L U M V I T A E (November 23, 2020) MANUEL PASTOR, JR. WORK ADDRESS University of Southern California Equity Research Institute (ERI) 1149 South Hill Street, Suite H-340 Los Angeles, CA 90015 (213) 740-5604; FAX: (213) 740-0056; E-MAIL: [email protected] TEACHING EXPERIENCE 2007-: Distinguished Professor of Sociology Turpanjian Chair in Civil Society & Social Change (2015-) Director, Equity Research Institute (formally the Program for Environmental and Regional Equity and the Center for the Study of Immigrant Intergration (2007-today) 1996-07: Professor, Latin American & Latino Studies (LALS), UC Santa Cruz; Chair of LALS, 1996-1999; Director (2000-2003)/ Co-Director (2003-2007), Center for Justice, Tolerance, and Community 1984-96: Professor (previously Assistant and Associate) of Economics & Director (1993-96), International & Public Affairs Center, Occidental College 1993-96: Visiting Associate Professor, Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific Studies, University of California, San Diego 1991: Visiting Associate Professor, Graduate School of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of California, Los Angeles HONORS AND AWARDS Community: James Rouse Spirit of Enterprise Award, Enterprise Community Partners, 2019 Champion for Equity, Advancement Project, 2017 Loving Civil Rights Award Honoree, Connecticut Fair Housing Center, 2012 Wally Marks ChangeMaker of the Year Award, Liberty Hill Foundation, 2012 Civic Entrepreneur of the Year Award, California Center for Regional Leadership. 2002 Professional: Appointed as a Distinguished Professor, University of Southern California, 2019 Award for Public Sociology in International Migration, presented by the American Sociology Association’s International Migration Section, 2018 USC Associate’s Award for Creativity in Research and Scholarship, 2018 Elizondo Distinguished Visiting Professor at Notre Dame’s Institute for Latino Studies, 2016 Page 1 Albert S.
    [Show full text]
  • WARN Report Summary by Received Date 07/01/2019 - 06/30/2020 State Fiscal Year No
    WARN Report Summary by Received Date 07/01/2019 - 06/30/2020 State Fiscal Year No. Of Notice Date Effective Date Received Date Company City County Employees Layoff/Closure 06/10/2020 06/09/2020 06/30/2020 Harbor Bay Club, Inc Alameda Alameda County 80 Layoff Temporary 03/20/2020 03/20/2020 06/30/2020 MD2 Industries, LLC Long Beach Los Angeles County 109 Closure Temporary 06/30/2020 08/21/2020 06/30/2020 NBCUniversal Media, LLC - Digital Lab Unit Universal City Los Angeles County 28 Layoff Temporary 04/22/2020 06/22/2020 06/30/2020 House of Blues Anaheim Anaheim Orange County 8 Closure Temporary 06/29/2020 08/01/2020 06/30/2020 ADESA California, LLC dba ADESA/AFC Los Mira Loma Riverside County 71 Layoff Permanent Angeles 06/17/2020 06/17/2020 06/30/2020 K&N Engineering, Inc. Riverside Riverside County 44 Layoff Permanent 06/29/2020 07/28/2020 06/30/2020 Benchmark Arrowhead, LLC dba Lake Lake Arrowhead San Bernardino County 114 Layoff Permanent Arrowhead Resort and Spa 06/18/2020 07/06/2020 06/30/2020 HOWMET Aerospace Fontana San Bernardino County 75 Layoff Temporary 06/18/2020 06/16/2020 06/30/2020 Bahia Resort Hotel San Diego San Diego County 47 Layoff Permanent 06/18/2020 06/16/2020 06/30/2020 Catamaran Resort Hotel and Spa San Diego San Diego County 46 Layoff Permanent 06/18/2020 06/16/2020 06/30/2020 The Lodge Torrey Pines La Jolla San Diego County 84 Layoff Permanent 06/18/2020 06/18/2020 06/30/2020 Bahia Resort Hotel San Diego San Diego County 33 Layoff Temporary 06/18/2020 06/18/2020 06/30/2020 Catamaran Resort Hotel and Spa San Diego San Diego County 33 Layoff Temporary 06/18/2020 06/18/2020 06/30/2020 The Lodge Torrey Pines La Jolla San Diego County 37 Layoff Temporary 06/08/2020 03/30/2020 06/30/2020 SmartCareMD Escondido San Diego County 38 Layoff Permanent 06/29/2020 08/31/2020 06/30/2020 Stryker Employment Company Menlo Park San Mateo County 33 Layoff Permanent 06/29/2020 08/29/2020 06/30/2020 Nitto, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Crater Volcanic Field (Reveille and Pancake Ranges, Basin and Range Province, Nevada, USA)
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Lunar Crater volcanic field (Reveille and Pancake Ranges, Basin and Range Province, Nevada, USA) 1 2,3 4 5 4 5 1 GEOSPHERE; v. 13, no. 2 Greg A. Valentine , Joaquín A. Cortés , Elisabeth Widom , Eugene I. Smith , Christine Rasoazanamparany , Racheal Johnsen , Jason P. Briner , Andrew G. Harp1, and Brent Turrin6 doi:10.1130/GES01428.1 1Department of Geology, 126 Cooke Hall, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14260, USA 2School of Geosciences, The Grant Institute, The Kings Buildings, James Hutton Road, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH 3FE, UK 3School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, NE1 7RU, UK 31 figures; 3 tables; 3 supplemental files 4Department of Geology and Environmental Earth Science, Shideler Hall, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, USA 5Department of Geoscience, 4505 S. Maryland Parkway, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154, USA CORRESPONDENCE: gav4@ buffalo .edu 6Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 610 Taylor Road, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8066, USA CITATION: Valentine, G.A., Cortés, J.A., Widom, ABSTRACT some of the erupted magmas. The LCVF exhibits clustering in the form of E., Smith, E.I., Rasoazanamparany, C., Johnsen, R., Briner, J.P., Harp, A.G., and Turrin, B., 2017, overlapping and colocated monogenetic volcanoes that were separated by Lunar Crater volcanic field (Reveille and Pancake The Lunar Crater volcanic field (LCVF) in central Nevada (USA) is domi­ variable amounts of time to as much as several hundred thousand years, but Ranges, Basin and Range Province, Nevada, USA): nated by monogenetic mafic volcanoes spanning the late Miocene to Pleisto­ without sustained crustal reservoirs between the episodes.
    [Show full text]
  • NSA) Surveillance Programmes (PRISM) and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Activities and Their Impact on EU Citizens' Fundamental Rights
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT C: CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS The US National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance programmes (PRISM) and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) activities and their impact on EU citizens' fundamental rights NOTE Abstract In light of the recent PRISM-related revelations, this briefing note analyzes the impact of US surveillance programmes on European citizens’ rights. The note explores the scope of surveillance that can be carried out under the US FISA Amendment Act 2008, and related practices of the US authorities which have very strong implications for EU data sovereignty and the protection of European citizens’ rights. PE xxx.xxx EN AUTHOR(S) Mr Caspar BOWDEN (Independent Privacy Researcher) Introduction by Prof. Didier BIGO (King’s College London / Director of the Centre d’Etudes sur les Conflits, Liberté et Sécurité – CCLS, Paris, France). Copy-Editing: Dr. Amandine SCHERRER (Centre d’Etudes sur les Conflits, Liberté et Sécurité – CCLS, Paris, France) Bibliographical assistance : Wendy Grossman RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Mr Alessandro DAVOLI Policy Department Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its monthly newsletter please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in MMMMM 200X. Brussels, © European Parliament, 200X. This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]