Publication 15-B, Employer's Tax Guide to Fringe Benefits

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Publication 15-B, Employer's Tax Guide to Fringe Benefits Userid: CPM Schema: tipx Leadpct: 100% Pt. size: 10 Draft Ok to Print AH XSL/XML Fileid: … tions/P15B/2021/A/XML/Cycle06/source (Init. & Date) _______ Page 1 of 34 11:55 - 5-Feb-2021 The type and rule above prints on all proofs including departmental reproduction proofs. MUST be removed before printing. Department of the Treasury Contents Internal Revenue Service What's New .............................. 1 Publication 15-B Reminders ............................... 2 Cat. No. 29744N Introduction .............................. 2 1. Fringe Benefit Overview ................... 3 Employer's 2. Fringe Benefit Exclusion Rules ............. 5 Accident and Health Benefits ................ 5 Achievement Awards ..................... 8 Tax Guide to Adoption Assistance ...................... 8 Athletic Facilities ......................... 9 Fringe De Minimis (Minimal) Benefits ............... 9 Dependent Care Assistance ............... 10 Educational Assistance ................... 10 Benefits Employee Discounts ..................... 11 Employee Stock Options .................. 12 Employer-Provided Cell Phones ............ 13 For use in 2021 Group-Term Life Insurance Coverage ........ 13 Health Savings Accounts ................. 16 Lodging on Your Business Premises ......... 17 Meals ............................... 17 No-Additional-Cost Services ............... 19 Retirement Planning Services .............. 20 Transportation (Commuting) Benefits ......... 20 Tuition Reduction ....................... 22 Working Condition Benefits ................ 22 3. Fringe Benefit Valuation Rules ............. 25 General Valuation Rule ................... 25 Cents-Per-Mile Rule ..................... 25 Commuting Rule ........................ 26 Lease Value Rule ....................... 27 Unsafe Conditions Commuting Rule .......... 29 4. Rules for Withholding, Depositing, and Reporting ............................ 30 How To Get Tax Help ...................... 31 Index .................................. 34 Future Developments For the latest information about developments related to Pub. 15-B, such as legislation enacted after it was published, go to IRS.gov/Pub15B. For the latest guidance and information about COVID-19 tax relief, go to IRS.gov/ Coronavirus. Get forms and other information faster and easier at: • IRS.gov (English) • IRS.gov/Korean (한국어) What's New • IRS.gov/Spanish (Español) • IRS.gov/Russian (Pусский) • IRS.gov/Chinese (中文) • IRS.gov/Vietnamese (TiếngViệt) Cents-per-mile rule. The business mileage rate for 2021 is 56 cents per mile. You may use this rate to reimburse an employee for business use of a personal vehicle, and Feb 05, 2021 Page 2 of 34 Fileid: … tions/P15B/2021/A/XML/Cycle06/source 11:55 - 5-Feb-2021 The type and rule above prints on all proofs including departmental reproduction proofs. MUST be removed before printing. under certain conditions, you may use the rate under the States in which the marriage is entered into, regardless of cents-per-mile rule to value the personal use of a vehicle legal residence. Two individuals who enter into a relation- you provide to an employee. See Cents-Per-Mile Rule in ship that is denominated as a marriage under the laws of section 3. a foreign jurisdiction are recognized as married for federal Qualified parking exclusion and commuter transpor- tax purposes if the relationship would be recognized as tation benefit. For 2021, the monthly exclusion for quali- marriage under the laws of at least one state, possession, fied parking is $270 and the monthly exclusion for com- or territory of the United States, regardless of legal resi- muter highway vehicle transportation and transit passes is dence. Individuals who have entered into a registered do- $270. These amounts are unchanged from 2020. See mestic partnership, civil union, or other similar relationship Qualified Transportation Benefits in section 2. that isn't denominated as a marriage under the law of the Contribution limit on a health flexible spending ar- state, possession, or territory of the United States where rangement (FSA). For plan years beginning in 2021, a such relationship was entered into aren't lawfully married cafeteria plan may not allow an employee to request sal- for federal tax purposes, regardless of legal residence. ary reduction contributions for a health FSA in excess of Notice 2014-1 discusses how certain rules for cafeteria $2,750. This amount is unchanged from 2020. For more plans, including health and dependent care FSAs, and information, including information about temporary health savings accounts (HSAs) apply to same-sex spou- COVID-19 relief for health and dependent care FSAs for ses participating in employee benefit plans. Notice 2020 and 2021, see Cafeteria Plans in section 1. 2014-1, 2014-2 I.R.B. 270, is available at IRS.gov/irb/ New Form 1099-NEC. There is a new Form 1099-NEC 2014-02_IRB#NOT-2014-1. to report nonemployee compensation paid in 2020. The Getting tax forms, instructions, and publications. 2020 Form 1099-NEC is due February 1, 2021. Visit IRS.gov/Forms to download current and prior-year forms, instructions, and publications. Ordering tax forms, instructions, and publications. Reminders Go to IRS.gov/OrderForms to order current forms, instruc- tions, and publications; call 800-829-3676 to order Moving expense reimbursements. P.L. 115-97, Tax prior-year forms and instructions. The IRS will process Cuts and Jobs Act, suspends the exclusion for qualified your order as soon as possible. Do not resubmit requests moving expense reimbursements from your employee's you've already sent us. You can get forms, instructions, income for tax years beginning after 2017 and before and publications faster online. 2026. However, the exclusion is still available in the case Getting answers to your tax questions. If you have a of a member of the U.S. Armed Forces on active duty who tax question not answered by this publication, check moves because of a permanent change of station due to a IRS.gov and How To Get Tax Help at the end of this publi- military order. The exclusion applies only to reimburse- cation. ment of moving expenses that the member could deduct if Photographs of missing children. The IRS is a proud he or she had paid or incurred them without reimburse- partner with the National Center for Missing & Exploited ment. See Moving Expenses in Pub. 3, Armed Forces' Children® (NCMEC). Photographs of missing children se- Tax Guide, for the definition of what constitutes a perma- lected by the Center may appear in this publication on pa- nent change of station and to learn which moving expen- ges that would otherwise be blank. You can help bring ses are deductible. these children home by looking at the photographs and Bicycle commuting reimbursements. P.L. 115-97 sus- calling 1-800-THE-LOST (1-800-843-5678) if you recog- pends the exclusion of qualified bicycle commuting reim- nize a child. bursements from your employee's income for tax years beginning after 2017 and before 2026. See Transportation (Commuting) Benefits in section 2. Withholding on supplemental wages. P.L. 115-97 low- Introduction ered the federal income tax withholding rates on supple- This publication supplements Pub. 15, Employer's Tax mental wages for tax years beginning after 2017 and be- Guide, and Pub. 15-A, Employer's Supplemental Tax fore 2026. See Withholding and depositing taxes in Guide. It contains information for employers on the em- section 4 for the withholding rates. ployment tax treatment of fringe benefits. Additional permitted election changes for health cov- erage under a cafeteria plan. Notice 2014-55, 2014-41 Comments and suggestions. We welcome your com- I.R.B. 672, available at IRS.gov/irb/ ments about this publication and your suggestions for fu- 2014-41_IRB#NOT-2014-55, expands the application of ture editions. the permitted change rules for health coverage under a You can send us comments through IRS.gov/ cafeteria plan and discusses two specific situations in FormComments. which a cafeteria plan participant is permitted to revoke Or you can write to: his or her election under a cafeteria plan during a period of coverage. Internal Revenue Service Definition of marriage. A marriage of two individuals is Tax Forms and Publications recognized for federal tax purposes if the marriage is rec- 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, IR-6526 ognized by the state, possession, or territory of the United Washington, DC 20224 Page 2 Publication 15-B (2021) Page 3 of 34 Fileid: … tions/P15B/2021/A/XML/Cycle06/source 11:55 - 5-Feb-2021 The type and rule above prints on all proofs including departmental reproduction proofs. MUST be removed before printing. Although we can't respond individually to each com- Statement. However, you can use special rules to with- ment received, we do appreciate your feedback and will hold, deposit, and report the employment taxes. These consider your comments as we revise our tax forms, in- rules are discussed in section 4. structions, and publications. Do not send tax questions, If the recipient of a taxable fringe benefit isn't your em- tax returns, or payments to this address. ployee, the benefit isn't subject to employment taxes. However, you may have to report the benefit on one of the following information returns. 1. Fringe Benefit Overview If the recipient A fringe benefit is a form of pay for the performance of receives the benefit services. For example, you provide an employee with a as: Use: fringe benefit when you allow the employee to use a busi- An independent Form 1099-NEC, Nonemployee
Recommended publications
  • Form W-4, Employee's Withholding Certificate
    Employee’s Withholding Certificate OMB No. 1545-0074 Form W-4 ▶ (Rev. December 2020) Complete Form W-4 so that your employer can withhold the correct federal income tax from your pay. ▶ Department of the Treasury Give Form W-4 to your employer. 2021 Internal Revenue Service ▶ Your withholding is subject to review by the IRS. Step 1: (a) First name and middle initial Last name (b) Social security number Enter Address ▶ Does your name match the Personal name on your social security card? If not, to ensure you get Information City or town, state, and ZIP code credit for your earnings, contact SSA at 800-772-1213 or go to www.ssa.gov. (c) Single or Married filing separately Married filing jointly or Qualifying widow(er) Head of household (Check only if you’re unmarried and pay more than half the costs of keeping up a home for yourself and a qualifying individual.) Complete Steps 2–4 ONLY if they apply to you; otherwise, skip to Step 5. See page 2 for more information on each step, who can claim exemption from withholding, when to use the estimator at www.irs.gov/W4App, and privacy. Step 2: Complete this step if you (1) hold more than one job at a time, or (2) are married filing jointly and your spouse Multiple Jobs also works. The correct amount of withholding depends on income earned from all of these jobs. or Spouse Do only one of the following. Works (a) Use the estimator at www.irs.gov/W4App for most accurate withholding for this step (and Steps 3–4); or (b) Use the Multiple Jobs Worksheet on page 3 and enter the result in Step 4(c) below for roughly accurate withholding; or (c) If there are only two jobs total, you may check this box.
    [Show full text]
  • Fringe Knowledge for Beginners
    Fringe Knowledge for Beginners Fringe Knowledge for Beginners By Montalk 2008 www.montalk.net [email protected] FRINGE KNOWLEDGE FOR BEGINNERS By Montalk 2008 montalk.net ISBN 978-1-60702-602-0 Version 1.0 » August 2008 Bound Hardcopies: http://www.lulu.com/content/584693 E-book and Related Articles: http://www.montalk.net Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License: You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work under the following conditions: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). You may not use this work for commercial purposes. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder (email: [email protected]). Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author's moral rights. To view a full copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This book is dedicated to my two younger brothers and my sister. Note: Footnotes in italics are key phrases to enter into web search engines. Contents FOREWORD....................................................................................................9 THE BASICS ..................................................................................................11 ETHERIC AND ASTRAL BODIES ........................................................12 CONSCIOUSNESS........................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Expected Inflation and the Constant-Growth Valuation Model* by Michael Bradley, Duke University, and Gregg A
    VOLUME 20 | NUMBER 2 | SPRING 2008 Journal of APPLIED CORPORATE FINANCE A MORGAN STANLEY PUBLICATION In This Issue: Valuation and Corporate Portfolio Management Corporate Portfolio Management Roundtable 8 Panelists: Robert Bruner, University of Virginia; Robert Pozen, Presented by Ernst & Young MFS Investment Management; Anne Madden, Honeywell International; Aileen Stockburger, Johnson & Johnson; Forbes Alexander, Jabil Circuit; Steve Munger and Don Chew, Morgan Stanley. Moderated by Jeff Greene, Ernst & Young Liquidity, the Value of the Firm, and Corporate Finance 32 Yakov Amihud, New York University, and Haim Mendelson, Stanford University Real Asset Valuation: A Back-to-Basics Approach 46 David Laughton, University of Alberta; Raul Guerrero, Asymmetric Strategy LLC; and Donald Lessard, MIT Sloan School of Management Expected Inflation and the Constant-Growth Valuation Model 66 Michael Bradley, Duke University, and Gregg Jarrell, University of Rochester Single vs. Multiple Discount Rates: How to Limit “Influence Costs” 79 John Martin, Baylor University, and Sheridan Titman, in the Capital Allocation Process University of Texas at Austin The Era of Cross-Border M&A: How Current Market Dynamics are 84 Marc Zenner, Matt Matthews, Jeff Marks, and Changing the M&A Landscape Nishant Mago, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. Transfer Pricing for Corporate Treasury in the Multinational Enterprise 97 Stephen L. Curtis, Ernst & Young The Equity Market Risk Premium and Valuation of Overseas Investments 113 Luc Soenen,Universidad Catolica del Peru, and Robert Johnson, University of San Diego Stock Option Expensing: The Role of Corporate Governance 122 Sanjay Deshmukh, Keith M. Howe, and Carl Luft, DePaul University Real Options Valuation: A Case Study of an E-commerce Company 129 Rocío Sáenz-Diez, Universidad Pontificia Comillas de Madrid, Ricardo Gimeno, Banco de España, and Carlos de Abajo, Morgan Stanley Expected Inflation and the Constant-Growth Valuation Model* by Michael Bradley, Duke University, and Gregg A.
    [Show full text]
  • 19840016951.Pdf
    //,€7.,¢_'____,_ NASATechnicalMemorandum83658 NASA-TM-83658 / 724_o/_¢s/ ' Optimization of Fringe-Type Laser - Anemometers for Turbine Engine Component Testing Richard G. Seasholtz, Lawrence G. Oberle, and Donald H. Weikle Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio rr_,:.-._"3L,_ f_':_":-''_,: Prepared for the TwentiethJoint PropulsionConference ' cosponsoredby the AIAA, SAE, and ASME Cincinnati,Ohio, June 11-13, 1984 ,, AIAA-84-1459 OptimizationofFringe-TypeLaser AnemometersforTurbineEngine ComponentTesting RichardG.SeasholtzLawrenceG.Oberle andDonaldH. Weikle,LewisResearchCenter Cleveland,OH AIAA/SAE/ASME 20thJointPropulsionConference June11-13,1984/Cincinnati,Ohio Forpermissiontocopyorrepublishcon, tactht eAmericanInstitutoefAeronauticsandAstronautics 1633Broadway,NewYork,NY10019 "2 ° . OPTIMIZATION OF FRINGE-TYPELASERANEMOMETERSFORTURBINEENGINECOMPONENTTESTING Richard G. Seasholtz, Lawrence G. Oberle, and Donald H. Weikle National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio 44135 Abstract ^ Pl,2 unit vectors normal to incident beams The fringe-type laser anemometer is analyzed and in scattering planes using the Cramer-Rao bound for the variance of the p(x,y) pedestal signal defined by eq. (ii) • merit.estimate Mieof scatteringthe Doppler theoryfrequencyis usedas atofigure-of-calculate p(_I_) likelihood function the Doppler signal wherein both the amplitude and Po integral of p(x,y) over aperture " account.phase of theThescatterednoise fromlightwallarescattertaken isintocalculated P laser power o using the wall bidirectionalreflectivity and the ql,2^_ unit vectors normal to scattered beam irradianceof the incident beams. A procedure is described to determine the optimum aperture mask and in scatteringplanes for the probe volume located a given distance from q(x,y) signal defined by eq. (11) a wall. The expected performance of counter-type processors is also discussed in relation to the qo integral of q(x,y) over aperture Cramer-Rao bound.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2: What's Fair About Taxes?
    Hoover Classics : Flat Tax hcflat ch2 Mp_35 rev0 page 35 2. What’s Fair about Taxes? economists and politicians of all persuasions agree on three points. One, the federal income tax is not sim- ple. Two, the federal income tax is too costly. Three, the federal income tax is not fair. However, economists and politicians do not agree on a fourth point: What does fair mean when it comes to taxes? This disagree- ment explains, in large measure, why it so difficult to find a replacement for the federal income tax that meets the other goals of simplicity and low cost. In recent years, the issue of fairness has come to overwhelm the other two standards used to evaluate tax systems: cost (efficiency) and simplicity. Recall the 1992 presidential campaign. Candidate Bill Clinton preached that those who “benefited unfairly” in the 1980s [the Tax Reform Act of 1986 reduced the top tax rate on upper-income taxpayers from 50 percent to 28 percent] should pay their “fair share” in the 1990s. What did he mean by such terms as “benefited unfairly” and should pay their “fair share?” Were the 1985 tax rates fair before they were reduced in 1986? Were the Carter 1980 tax rates even fairer before they were reduced by President Reagan in 1981? Were the Eisenhower tax rates fairer still before President Kennedy initiated their reduction? Were the original rates in the first 1913 federal income tax unfair? Were the high rates that prevailed during World Wars I and II fair? Were Andrew Mellon’s tax Hoover Classics : Flat Tax hcflat ch2 Mp_36 rev0 page 36 36 The Flat Tax rate cuts unfair? Are the higher tax rates President Clin- ton signed into law in 1993 the hallmark of a fair tax system, or do rates have to rise to the Carter or Eisen- hower levels to be fair? No aspect of federal income tax policy has been more controversial, or caused more misery, than alle- gations that some individuals and income groups don’t pay their fair share.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 City Enrichment Fund SUMMARY
    Appendix A to Report GRA19002 2019 City Enrichment Fund SUMMARY No. of 2019 Budget 2019 Category Apps (Total) 2019 Requested Recommended Budget vs Recommended Community Services CS - A Hunger/Shelter 10 $ 416,324 $ 360,015 CS - B Everyone Safe 9 $ 294,291 $ 286,846 CS - C Everyone Thrives 9 $ 299,588 $ 268,321 CS - D No Youth Left Behind 7 $ 180,209 $ 159,608 CS - E Everyone Age in Place 20 $ 485,352 $ 455,101 CS - F Community Capacity Grows 11 $ 214,373 $ 189,492 CS - G Someone to Talk to 7 $ 247,728 $ 141,317 CS - H Emerging Needs 22 $ 553,916 $ 303,660 Community Services Total 95 $ 2,164,360 $ 2,691,781 $ 2,164,360 $ - 0.00% Agriculture AGR A Programs and Events 18 $ 178,615 $ 130,841 Agriculture Total 18 $ 143,361 $ 178,615 $ 130,841 $ 12,520 8.73% Arts ART - A Arts - Operating 34 $ 3,977,467 $ 2,436,164 ART - B Arts - Festival 10 $ 300,070 $ 179,486 ART - C Arts - Capacity Building 9 $ 113,000 $ 58,597 ART - D Arts - Creation & Presentation 35 $ 238,877 $ 96,295 Arts Total 88 $ 2,770,542 $ 4,629,414 $ 2,770,542 $ - 0.00% Environment ENV-A Capacity Building - $ - $ - ENV-C Project and Programs 8 $ 180,364 $ 114,925 Environment Total 8 $ 146,390 $ 180,364 $ 114,925 $ 31,465 21.49% Page 1 of 20 Appendix A to Report GRA19002 No. of 2019 Budget 2019 Category Apps (Total) 2019 Requested Recommended Budget vs Recommended Communities, Culture & Heritage CCH - A CCH - Events 57 $ 782,985 $ 535,595 CCH - B CCH - New Projects 11 $ 165,092 $ 44,645 CCH - C CCH - Capacity Building 1 $ 6,900 $ - CCH Total 69 $ 564,972 $ 954,977 $ 580,240 -$ 15,268
    [Show full text]
  • Value Investing” Has Had a Rough Go of It in Recent Years
    True Value “Value investing” has had a rough go of it in recent years. In this quarter’s commentary, we would like to share our thoughts about value investing and its future by answering a few questions: 1) What is “value investing”? 2) How has value performed? 3) When will it catch up? In the 1992 Berkshire Hathaway annual letter, Warren Buffett offers a characteristically concise explanation of investment, speculation, and value investing. The letter’s section on this topic is filled with so many terrific nuggets that we include it at the end of this commentary. Directly below are Warren’s most salient points related to value investing. • All investing is value investing. WB: “…we think the very term ‘value investing’ is redundant. What is ‘investing’ if it is not the act of seeking value at least sufficient to justify the amount paid?” • Price speculation is the opposite of value investing. WB: “Consciously paying more for a stock than its calculated value - in the hope that it can soon be sold for a still-higher price - should be labeled speculation (which is neither illegal, immoral nor - in our view - financially fattening).” • Value is defined as the net future cash flows produced by an asset. WB: “In The Theory of Investment Value, written over 50 years ago, John Burr Williams set forth the equation for value, which we condense here: The value of any stock, bond or business today is determined by the cash inflows and outflows - discounted at an appropriate interest rate - that can be expected to occur during the remaining life of the asset.” • The margin-of-safety principle – buying at a low price-to-value – defines the “Graham & Dodd” school of value investing.
    [Show full text]
  • Using a Company Hourly Fringe Program As a Recruiting and Retention Tool by Philip Ely, Advantage Resource Inc
    Using a Company Hourly Fringe Program as a Recruiting and Retention Tool By Philip Ely, Advantage Resource Inc. For a few years now, companies have been finding it increasingly difficult to hire and retain quality employees. This problem affects all companies, regardless of industry or trade. Some commercial companies would use the possibility of working a prevailing wage project as a dangling carrot to attract employees to come work for them. In January 2017, however, the state of Kentucky voted to repeal its state prevailing wage law, catching many business owners by surprise. In its wake, companies throughout the region that have historically worked a high percentage of prevailing wage are trying to determine how the repeal affects their business. While company owners are indeed concerned about how business will change, employees are even more concerned about how the repeal will impact them. For most hourly employees, a decrease in prevailing wage opportunities will mean a reduction in gross wages, take home pay, and a general fear that benefits package offerings (health insurance, retirement plan, paid time off, etc.) will be cut. Employees with health insurance on themselves and their families are particularly anxious. Some employees base their standard of living on working prevailing wage projects. These worries will give rise to union discussion, and longtime employees looking for more stable options. For some companies, the law repeal and subsequent business environment change is seen as a threat. Companies used the required fringe component of the prevailing wage to help pay for employee benefits, to include health insurance, holiday and vacation pay, and retirement plan contributions.
    [Show full text]
  • FESTIVAL Program
    ogram IVAL pr FEST July 28 - Aug. 6 2017 GreatsaltlakeFringe.org Introduction introduction Welcome to the 2017 Great Salt Lake Fringe! We are so excited to be back for our third year of theatre, art, music, dance, and more, right in the heart of Sugar House. A little background: The Fringe started when Westminster College professors Nina and Michael Vought stumbled upon the New Orleans Fringe Festival and were captivated by the array of unique performances they saw there. They pitched the idea of a fringe festival in Salt Lake City to a group of students and alumni of Westminster, who ran with the Fringe spirit and, under the mentorship of the Voughts, produced the inaugural Great Salt Lake Fringe Festival in August 2015. So far, it’s been a great success! To date, the Fringe has paid out over $50,000 to 300+ artists, employed 100+ young people as staff and volunteers, and presented the world premieres of 50+ original productions. We strive to create opportunities for artists by providing accessible and affordable performances spaces, encouraging the development of original works, and inspiring a community of creativity and collaboration. The Fringe is unlike any other theatre experience. Here, you’ll find an artistic community that isn’t satisfied with the status quo. Fringe artists and audiences alike are willing to push limits, think outside the box, and embrace the unique nature of live performance. We invite you to jump in headfirst to two exhilarating weekends of engaging, varied, magical, funny, moving, thought-provoking, delightful Fringe! We’re glad you’re here, and we can’t wait for you to experience the amazing talent and creativity of our Fringe family.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Coordinator (Club Fringe) Position Description
    Program Coordinator (Club Fringe) Position Description Position Program Coordinator (Club Fringe) Reporting to Fringe Hub Producer Direct Reports N/A Position type Fixed-term, variable hours contract from 3 May – 5 November 2021. Indicative hours are as follows: May – June: 0.4 FTE July – Mid-August: 0.6 FTE Mid-August – October: Full-time (outside of work hours required during Festival) 5 days post-festival for reporting and evaluation. Salary $50,000 - $55,000 + 9.5% superannuation Benefits − Employee Assistance Program include − A serious commitment to lunch. ROLE SUMMARY The Program Coordinator (Club Fringe) is central to the delivery of the 2021 Club Fringe program, the series of late-night parties happening throughout the Festival, as well as for the rollout of one-off special events, such as the Program Launch and other events that may occur throughout the Festival. An understanding of events management, a love of big party nights and a strong knowledge of, and engagement with, the independent arts sector in Melbourne will be central to this role. Reporting to the Fringe Hub Producer, this position also works collaboratively with the Creative Director & CEO and the Head of Programs & Projects to take the conceived Club Fringe program and deliver it as a series of fun, energy-driven party nights. Event management will be your wheelhouse – everything from liaising with artists about the programming to planning run-sheets down to the minute and managing the parties on the night. Your knowledge of the local arts and events sectors will help you in curating the best line-ups of artists and DJs, while your excellent communication and administrative skills will make sure the whole program is planned out and delivered smoothly.
    [Show full text]
  • Fringe Or Grey Literature in the National Library: on "Papyrolatry" and the Growing Similarity Between the Materials in Libraries and Archives LISE HESSELAGER
    American Archivist/Volume 47, No. 3/Summer 1984 255 Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/american-archivist/article-pdf/47/3/255/2747170/aarc_47_3_l631t82130464n07.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Fringe or Grey literature in the National Library: On "Papyrolatry" and the Growing Similarity Between the Materials in Libraries and Archives LISE HESSELAGER Abstract: The amassing of a national collection of books and related materials has been a continuing objective ever since the enactment of the first legal deposit law, the Ordonnance de Montpellier of 1537. There are various degrees of comprehensiveness, from deposit only in connection with copyright, to deposit of all printed information (and, by analogy, information in any other medium). The information revolution of the twentieth century is closely associated with the media revolution, and by 1984 per- manent preservation of all information in national repositories has become a Utopian goal. Modern reprography and new media have changed the materials of archives and libraries and complicated the distinction between them. Reprography has created problems of definition for Scandinavian national libraries, whose collections are based on deposit from printers. Much of the grey, or non-conventional, literature that is presently being discussed by information scientists can be identified as docu- ments that were formerly reserved for the archives. It is suggested that archivists and librarians cooperate in defining their fields of collection and in revising their methodologies in the light of new technology, in order to cope with the massive amounts of material. About the author: Lise Hesselager was born in Denmark and received her cand. mag.
    [Show full text]
  • Marketing-Strategy-Ferrel-Hartline.Pdf
    Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it. Marketing Strategy Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it. This is an electronic version of the print textbook. Due to electronic rights restrictions, some third party content may be suppressed. Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. The publisher reserves the right to remove content from this title at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it. For valuable information on pricing, previous editions, changes to current editions, and alternate formats, please visit www.cengage.com/highered to search by ISBN#, author, title, or keyword for materials in your areas of interest. Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
    [Show full text]