DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Protection Agency § 52.2063

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Protection Agency § 52.2063 Environmental Protection Agency § 52.2063 approval procedures, or plan require- (5) Non-regulatory additions to plan ments which do not conform with the regarding Allegheny County Source plan approval program requirements or Surveillance regulations submitted on the requirements of EPA’s underlying June 20, 1972, by the Pennsylvania De- regulations. partment of Environmental Resources. (b) Emission limitations and related (6) Miscellaneous non-regulatory ad- provisions which are established in ditions to the plan submitted August Pennsylvania general plan approvals as 14, 1972, by the Pennsylvania Depart- federally enforceable conditions shall ment of Environmental Resources. be enforceable by EPA. EPA reserves (7) Revision to Philadelphia Air Man- the right to deem general plan ap- agement Services regulations sub- proval conditions not federally enforce- mitted November 3, 1972, by the Gov- able. Such a determination will be ernor. made according to appropriate proce- (8) Revision to compliance schedules dures, and be based upon the general for Clairton Coke Works in Allegheny plan approval, the relevant approval County submitted December 14, 1972, procedures, or plan requirements which by the Governor. do not conform with the general plan (9) Transportation Control Plan for approval program requirements or the Southwest Pennsylvania and Metro- requirements of EPA’s underlying reg- politan Philadelphia AQCR’s submitted ulations. April 13, 1973, by the Governor. (10) [Reserved] [61 FR 39597, 39601, July 30, 1996] (11) Amendments to Philadelphia Air § 52.2063 Original identification of Management Services regulation num- plan section. ber 3 submitted April 15, 1974, by the Governor. (a) This section identifies the origi- (12) Amendments to Philadelphia Air nal ‘‘Air Implementation Plan for the Management Services regulations Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’’ and numbers 1, 2 and 11 submitted May 28, all revisions submitted by Pennsyl- 1974, by the Governor. vania that were federally approved (13) Process factor for glass produc- prior to February 10, 2005. tion furnaces submitted on December (b) The plan was officially submitted 26, 1974, by the Pennsylvania Depart- on January 27, 1972. ment of Environmental Resources. (c) The plan revisions listed below (14) Amendments to Chapters 123 were submitted on the dates specified. (section 123.24) and 139 (section 139.13), (1) Regulations 121, 123, 127, 129, 131, controlling zinc smelter operations; 135, 137, 139, and 141 of the Pennsyl- submitted on August 7, 1975 by the vania Code of Regulations submitted Pennsylvania Department of Environ- March 17, 1972, by the Pennsylvania De- mental Resources. partment of Environmental Resources. (15) A revision submitted by the Com- (2) Air Quality Data for three addi- monwealth of Pennsylvania on August tional months regarding Reading Air 11, 1976 amending Title 3 of the Phila- Basin SO2 strategy submitted March delphia Code, Subsection 3–103, En- 27, 1972, by the Pennsylvania Depart- forcement; Subsection 3–301, Powers ment of Environmental Resources. and Duties of the Department of Public (3) Miscellaneous non-regulatory ad- Health; and Subsection 3–305 Orders. ditions and clarifications to the plan (16) Revisions submitted by the Com- submitted on May 4, 1972, by the Penn- monwealth of Pennsylvania on Decem- sylvania Department of Environmental ber 11, 1972 amending regulations for Resources. the powers and duties of the Depart- (4) ‘‘An Implementation Plan for the ment of Environmental Resources, the Attainment and Maintenance of the Environmental Quality Board and the National Ambient Air Quality Stand- Environmental Hearing Board. ards for Allegheny County, Common- (17) Amendment to Article XVIII, wealth of Pennsylvania, 1980’’, and Ar- Rules and Regulations of the Allegheny ticle XX (which replaces Article County Health Department, Sections XVIII), which were submitted on De- 1800 (Definitions) and 1813 (Air Pollu- cember 24, 1980. tion Emergency Episode Regulations). 81 VerDate Mar<15>2010 12:36 Aug 12, 2013 Jkt 229151 PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\229151.XXX 229151 pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with CFR § 52.2063 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–13 Edition) These amendments were submitted on mitted on June 8, 1979, by the Sec- May 15, 1978 by the Department of En- retary of the Pennsylvania Department vironmental Resources. of Environmental Resources. (18) Amendments to Title 3, Section (25) Total Suspended Particulate, 3–207 (Sale of Fuel Oil) of the Philadel- State Implementation Plan for Penn- phia Code pertaining to Philadelphia sylvania, submitted on June 12, 1979, by County and to Title 25, Part I, Subpart the Secretary of the Pennsylvania De- C, Article III, Chapter 121 (Definitions) partment of Environmental Resources. and Chapter 123 (Standards for Con- (26) Special Permit Requirements for taminants, Sulfur Compound Emis- Sources Locating in or Significantly sions) of the Pennsylvania Code per- Impacting Nonattainment Areas and a taining to Bucks, Chester, Delaware, revision of Sampling and Testing and Montgomery Counties submitted methods for total suspended particu- on July 31, 1978 by the Governor. late amending Chapters 121, 127, and 139 (19) Amendments to Chapters 121 of the Pennsylvania Code submitted on (§ 121.1), 123 (§§ 123.1, 123.13, 123.44), 127 June 12, 1979, by the Secretary of the (§§ 127.41 through 127.52, inclusive), 129 Pennsylvania Department of Environ- (§§ 129.15 and 129.16), and 139 (§§ 139.51, mental Resources. 139.52, 139.53 and 139.61), dealing with (27) Transportation element for the the control of coke oven battery oper- Harrisburg area submitted on June 13, ations; submitted on June 30, 1978 by 1979, by the Secretary of the Pennsyl- the Pennsylvania Department of Envi- vania Department of Environmental ronmental Resources. Resources. (20) Amendments to Chapters 121 (28) Allegheny County Volatile Or- (§ 121.1), 123 (§§ 123.22(b) and 123.45), and ganic Compound Regulations amending 139 (§§ 139.3, 139.4, 139.13, 139.16, 139.101, Chapters I, II, and V of Allegheny 139.102, 139.103, 139.104 and 139.105), deal- County Regulations submitted on June ing with sulfur dioxide emissions from 13, 1979, by the Secretary of the Penn- fuel-burning installations, only as they sylvania Department of Environmental apply to sources in the Erie air basin; Resources. submitted on April 24, 1979 by Governor (29) Documentation of the status of Thornburgh. transportation/air quality measures in (21) A revision submitted by the Com- a letter of August 20, 1979 from the monwealth of Pennsylvania on Sep- Lackawanna County Planning Commis- tember 20, 1978 to clarify terms and in- sion. tent of Chapter 121 (relating to general (30) Information from the South- provisions), Chapter 123 (relating to western Pennsylvania Regional Plan- standards for contaminants) and Chap- ning Commission of September 17, 1979 ter 129 (relating to standards for on the calculation of emission esti- sources). mates and the status of certain trans- (22) The ‘‘1979 State Implementation portation measures. Plan (SIP) Submission for the Attain- (31) Reclassification of several trans- ment of the Photochemical Oxidant portation measures in the transpor- Standard in Pennsylvania’’ and ‘‘Reg- tation/air quality study for the Allen- ulations for Volatile Organic Com- town-Bethlehem-Easton area, sub- pounds’’ amending Chapters 121, 129, mitted by the Commonwealth on No- and 139 of the Pennsylvania Code sub- vember 19, 1979. mitted on April 24, 1979, by the Gov- (32) Substantiation of TSP planning ernor. and attainment schedules submitted by (23) Transportation elements of the the Commonwealth on November 28, SIP for Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Al- 1979. lentown-Bethlehem-Easton, and Scran- (33) A revision submitted by the Com- ton areas and commitment to imple- monwealth of Pennsylvania on August ment vehicle inspection and mainte- 11, 1976 consisting of an amendment to nance in Lehigh and Northampton the Pennsylvania Air Resources Regu- Counties submitted on June 7, 1979, by lations, Chapter 129, Standards for the Governor. Sources, which relates to open burning. (24) Transportation element of the (34) A revision was submitted by the SIP for the Wilkes-Barre area sub- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on 82 VerDate Mar<15>2010 12:36 Aug 12, 2013 Jkt 229151 PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\229151.XXX 229151 pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with CFR Environmental Protection Agency § 52.2063 January 25, 1980, which is intended to (43) Amendments to Air Management establish an Ambient Air Quality Mon- Regulations II and III, with supporting itoring Network for the Common- documents, submitted by Governor wealth of Pennsylvania and the City of Dick Thornburgh on December 8, 1981, Philadelphia. allowing the continued burning of an- (35) Amendments to the Pennsyl- thracite coal in existing space heating vania Air Resources Regulations, con- units currently burning coal. sisting of the addition of regulations (44) [Reserved] for alternative emission reduction lim- (45) Revisions submitted to the Com- itations (Sections 128.11 through 128.13 monwealth of Pennsylvania on Feb- for Andre Greenhouses, Inc., and Sec- ruary 23, 1982 to correct the condi- tion 128.14 for the 3M Co.), submitted tionally-approved portions of the 1979 on April 16, 1981. State Implementation Plan, specifi- (36) A revision submitted by the Com- cally the two asphalt regulations in Al- monwealth of Pennyslvania on April 9, legheny County. 1981 providing for attainment of the (46) A revision
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Summer 2018 Boilerplate
    BOILERPLATESummer 2018 Iron & Steel Hall of Fame Debuts Pr esident ’s Messag e Board of Directors One crucial part of our mission at • On-site visits – Scott G. Huston President NISHM is to educate the public on guided tours and Peter Nunn America’s iron and steel making exhibits Vice President/ Treasurer past. Education does not just take William T. Keen, Esq. • Events and Secretary place in the classroom, but also programs – lectures, Gregory M. Cary at places like museums, zoos, and bus trips, and more Albert J. Giannantonio nature preserves. Learning does Scott G. Huston Charles L. Huston III not occur with just conversation • Digital media – website, email, Harry Lewis between teacher and pupil, but also Facebook and Twitter pages, Mary Ann Rossi, Esq. YouTube channel Martha Skiadas with various media, both printed and digital types. • Print media – brochures, Executive Director James D. Ziegler Museums have a “media mix,” or newsletter, and publications Executive Director a variety of media that they use to There are plenty and a variety of Advisors interpret their site and also share options for you to learn more about Harold Skramstad their message with the community. what the museum does and about Museum Advisor Types of media can include printed Peter Saylor America’s steel heritage. If you Architectural Advisor brochures, on-site exhibits and have any questions about visiting Eugene L. DiOrio interpretive panels, living history, Historical Advisor or learning more, please contact guided tours, self-guiding audio our Educational Services Manager, devices and more. LeAnne Zolovich, at education@ Our Mission To learn at NISHM, you can use: steelmuseum.org.
    [Show full text]
  • The Huston Foundation Disclosure Statement
    2004 ANNUAL REPORT The Huston Foundation Disclosure Statement The Foundation, its Directors, and Officers may make recommendations for one-time solicited or unsolicited grants to qualified organizations, subject to the approval of The Huston Foundation Board of Directors. The Directors reserve the Qualified organizations are right, at their sole discretion, those approved by the IRS to determine and or modify the as tax exempt and meet the amount and duration of any grant. Foundation’s grantmaking Any grantee who wishes to requirements (guidelines). apply the sum total or any portion Any solicited or unsolicited of the specific grant funds to grant awarded by the Foundation, other purposes than that solicited in any year, does not constitute in the original request, must obtain a precedent for subsequent the permission to do so in writing grants to the same or other prior to the application of said qualified organizations. funds to other purposes. Contents 2 Background of The Huston Foundation 3 The Overall Mission 4 Board of Directors 5 Accountant’s Report 6 Statement of Investment Policy 7 Analysis of Distributions 10 Evangelical Distributions 20 Secular Distributions 31 Grant Requirements & Procedures Committed to Protestant 36 Pennsylvania Public Charity Evangelical Christian needs Registration Form worldwide and Secular purposes nationally Evangelical Ministries Secular Background of The Huston Foundation The Huston Foundation, a private founder of several family and children family foundation, was incorporated service organizations, including Health as a Pennsylvania non-profit corpora- and Welfare Council and The Family tion on December 12, 1957 for federal Services both of Chester County. As tax purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Graystone Society, Inc. the National Iron & Steel Heritage Museum
    Graystone Society, Inc. The National Iron & Steel Heritage Museum 2013 Annual Report Our Mission The Graystone Society is a not-for-profit educational institution whose mission is to promote an understanding of the iron and steel history of Coatesville, Chester County, Southeastern Pennsylvania and the region to audiences of all ages and interests by collecting, preserving, exhibiting and interpreting iron and steel’s history and its relationship to the region and nation beyond. The National Iron & Steel Heritage Museum is a project of the Graystone Society, a 501(c)3 Our Vision corporation registered with the Pennsylvania Bureau of Charitable Organizations The National Iron and Steel Heritage Museum of the Graystone Society is a vibrant place where people encounter, explore and learn about the past. With diverse audiences and Contents Chester County’s unique heritage at its core, the Graystone Executive Reports ........................1 Society is an educational leader in the history community of the Delaware Valley. In pursuit of this vision, the Graystone Society will: 2013 Board of Directors ..............2 • Identify, collect and exhibit significant historical materials related The Lukens National to the iron and steel history community of the Delaware Valley Historic District ............................3 • Provide leadership in the responsible preservation of and Our History ...................................4 public access to these historical materials Historical Buildings ......................8 • Encourage excellence in research, documentation and Acquisitions & Collections ........10 interpretation of historical materials 2013 Programs ........................... 12 • Present exhibitions that use historical materials to enrich the public’s understanding and appreciation for the iron and steel Lukens National Historic District Visitors ........................... 13 heritage of Coatesville, Chester County and Southeastern Pennsylvania region Communications Outreach .....
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Lukens Huston Papers 1174
    Charles Lukens Huston papers 1174 This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on September 14, 2021. Description is written in: English. Describing Archives: A Content Standard Manuscripts and Archives PO Box 3630 Wilmington, Delaware 19807 [email protected] URL: http://www.hagley.org/library Charles Lukens Huston papers 1174 Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Biographical Note .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Content ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 4 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 5 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Lukens/Huston Ancestral Papers ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-2025-CCCVB-Strategic-Plan
    Executive Summary Organization The Chester County’s Conference & Visitors Bureau (CCCVB) is the Destination Marketing Organization (DMO) for Chester County and its Brandywine Valley. DMO’s build quality of life and create opportunity in their communities by attracting visitors and investment to the area. This reflects the community driven message behind why we value tourism. The CCCVB uses a five-year strategic planning process, supplemented by an annual Action Plan including marketing and sales direction, in order to achieve these objectives and optimize performance. This 2020- 2025 Strategic Plan builds off the priorities and direction set forth in the CCCVB’s 2015-2020 plan. The Mission, Vision and Core Values of the organization are maintained, providing for valuable continuity in the strategic orientation of the organization. Within this framework, this 2020-2025 plan draws on and responds to updated information on the current consumer environment and positioning of the destination in order to optimize the tactical goals and strategies pursued by the Chester County Conference & Visitors Bureau over the next five years. Longwood Gardens MISSION Chester County Chester County’s Conference & Visitors Bureau Brandywine Valley To build awareness of and promote Chester To intrigue, captivate and welcome visitors with County’s Brandywine Valley as an ideal conference our charming small towns and scenic countryside and visitor destination to help stimulate healthy within close proximity to Philadelphia. We invite economic development and sustainability for the guests to connect with our fascinating history, County and its stakeholders. unique renowned attractions, diverse events, tranquil environments, and vibrant lifestyle. O R E V A L U C E S TY AUTH ALI EN PIT TI S CI O TY H O I S I N V P I A H To be universally R S T D I recognized as the S R T A premier Mid-Atlantic R Y W E destination delivering T S experiences that are C S unsurpassed in quality E S L E and diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron & Steel Museum Acquires Two Historic Mill Buildings
    Volume 46 Spring 2017 Number 2 Iron & Steel Museum Acquires Two Historic Mill Buildings he National Iron & Steel Heritage Museum ArcelorMittal and its predecessor companies have been (NISHM) announced the acquisition in late 2016 continuously producing iron and steel in Coatesville since of two historic mill buildings, known as the 120-in. 1810. The town’s ferrous-metal story began in that year, when T rolling mill and the motor house, which were used two men purchased a section of Moses Coates’s farm that con- in the former Lukens Steel Co. in Coatesville, Pa. (tour site, tained a saw mill. They converted the saw mill to an iron works 2004 SIA Fall Tour, Wilmington, Del.). These two buildings for a new venture called the Brandywine Iron Works & Nail were added as part of the WWII effort, where steel for battle- Factory. Soon after, Dr. Charles Lukens married proprietor ships, aircraft carriers, submarines, destroyers, landing craft, Isaac Pennock’s daughter, Rebecca, and joined his father-in- and tank parts was manufactured. Production was halted in law in the iron business. Lukens was interested in developing 1982 when rolling-mill machinery parts were moved to anoth- new products, especially iron plate for boilers, a fundamen- er plant in Conshohocken, Pa. (the former Alan Wood Steel tal component of the new steam-engine technology. In 1818 Plant, now owned and operated by ArcelorMittal). The mill Lukens’s mill became the first in America to successfully roll buildings are a gift from ArcelorMittal, the international steel boiler plate. With a strong and growing demand for depend- corporation of which Lukens Steel became part in the 2000s.
    [Show full text]
  • Lukens Steel Company Records 0050
    Lukens Steel Company records 0050 This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on September 26, 2021. Description is written in: English. Describing Archives: A Content Standard Manuscripts and Archives PO Box 3630 Wilmington, Delaware 19807 [email protected] URL: http://www.hagley.org/library Lukens Steel Company records 0050 Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Historical Note ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Content ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Arrangement ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 5 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 6 - Page 2 - Lukens Steel Company records 0050 Summary Information Repository: Manuscripts and Archives Creator:
    [Show full text]
  • The Huston Foundation
    The Huston Foundation 2010 Annual Report The Huston Foundation 2010 Annual Report Contents 2 Disclosure Statement 3 Background of The Huston Foundation 4 The Overall Mission 5 Board of Directors and Officers 5 Program Directors 6 Accountant’s Report 7 Statement of Investment Policy 8 Analysis of Grant Distributions 10 2010 Evangelical Ministries Distributions 18 2010 Secular Distributions 26 Grant Requirements and Procedures Committed to Protestant Evangelical Christian needs worldwide and Secular purposes nationally Disclosure Statement The Foundation, its Directors, and Officers may make recommendations for one-time solicited or unsolicited grants to qualified organizations, subject to the approval of The Huston Foundation Board of Directors. Qualified organizations are those approved by the IRS as tax exempt and meet the Foundation’s grantmaking requirements (guidelines). Any solicited or unsolicited grant awarded by the Foundation, in any year, does not constitute a precedent for subsequent grants to the same or other qualified organizations. The Directors reserve the right, at their sole discretion, to determine and/or modify the amount and duration of any grant. Any grantee who wishes to apply the sum total or any portion of the specific grant funds to other purposes than that solicited in the original request, must obtain prior permission to do so in writing. 2 The Huston Foundation 2010 Annual Report Background of The Huston Foundation The Huston Foundation, a private family foundation, was incorporated as a Pennsylvania non-profit corporation on December 12, 1957 for federal tax purposes. The Huston Foundation was established by Charles Lukens Huston, Jr. and his sister Ruth Huston, co-founders and principal donors as a tribute to their parents, Charles Lukens Huston, a Protestant Evangelical Christian philanthropic industrialist, and Anne Stewart Huston, a Protestant Evangelical Christian community leader.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and Comments
    Cornell Law Review Volume 26 Article 9 Issue 2 February 1941 Notes and Comments Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Notes and Comments, 26 Cornell L. Rev. 298 (1941) Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol26/iss2/9 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTES AND COMMENTS Administrative Law: Walsh-Healey Act: Right to bid on .federal con- tracts: Judicial control of administrative action.-Disturbed1 because the Government had been abetting sweatshop and substandard labor condi-2 tions by awarding contracts for supplies to the lowest responsible bidder, Congress on June 30, 1936, passed the Walsh-Healey Act.3 It empowers the Secretary of Labor, guided by findings and recommendations made after investigation by the Public Contracts Board, to include a stipulation in sup- ply contracts that the contractor pay not less than a fixed minimum wage. The standard to which the Secretary must adhere in fixing the wage level is "the prevailing minimum wages . in the locality" where the supplies are manufactured or furnished.4 Whether a prospective bidder can successfully challenge in the courts the Secretary's wage determinations -under the Act came before the Supreme Court for the first time in Perkins et al. v. Lukens Steel Company et al., 60 Sup.
    [Show full text]
  • Special 50Th Anniversary Historic Timeline
    Special 50th Anniversary Historic Timeline The Wilmington & Western’s Half-century of Operation May 1966 ~ May 2016 Edited by: Robert E. Wilhelm, Jr. Public Domain & Copyright Information This publication is provided in keeping with Historic Red Clay Valley’s (HRCV) purpose; “to promote interest in and engage in the operation of early transportation (particularly railroads); to preserve and restore historic sites and buildings; to establish and operate museums; and to issue such publications relating to the Red Clay Creek Valley as the members deem fitting and proper; all for the public welfare and for no other purpose." All textual material appearing in this publication is in the public domain and only limited excerpts of textural material may be reproduced or copied without permission from HRCV or the editor. Photographs, imagery, drawings, maps, and other illustrations and materials may be copyright by their owners and permission to reproduce or distribute such copyrighted material without the original owner’s specific permission is not granted by HRCV or the editor. This publication, in its entirety, is copyright © 2016 by the editor. Reproduction and/or distribution of this publication, in whole or in part, without the specific, written authorization of HRCV or the editor is prohibited. Citation of the source and credit to “Historic Red Clay Valley Incorporated” is requested and appreciated where material is referenced in other public and/or private works. You are granted a limited license to reference, use, and reproduce short “as printed” extracts (defined as less than one or more contiguous pages) of this publication for your own personal, non-commercial use only, per the guidelines above, provided reference and credit to HRCV is included with the excerpt.
    [Show full text]
  • Lukens Steel: a Pennsylvania Steel Company
    Teaching with Historic Placces Lesson Plans Lukens Steel: A Pennsylvania Steel Company The roar of the fire from the furnace and the smoke from the stacks told the men how long it would take to heat the iron or steel so it could be shaped into plates. The large water wheel creaking as it struggles with the heavy water of the Brandywine Creek making pass after pass. Air thick with a blue smoky haze from the charcoal furnaces and the sweat of the men was constantly around the rolling mill. The white-hot steel plates emerging from the roaring furnace onto the tables running towards the mouth of the huge iron rolls. Metal banging (National Iron & Steel Heritage Museum) against metal, emerging on the other side and made ready for another pass through the mill. At night the glow of a tap could light up the dark sky with a warm orange glow. These are the sights and sounds in the heart of Coatesville, Pennsylvania home to iron and steel making for over 200 years beginning in 1810. Here in rural Pennsylvania, the iron and steel workers could escape to the woods, fields, and creeks, and, although their work was often dangerous, they were paid relatively well. The Lukens National Historic District is now a national historic site, it lies in the middle of the Great Valley half way between Philadelphia and Harrisburg and along the Brandywine Creek halfway between Wilmington, Del- aware and Reading in Berks County in southeastern Pennsylvania. It Provides a glimpse into the iron and steel industry that played a central role in the growth of America as an industrial nation.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TERRY A. MROCZEK : CIVIL ACTION : vs. : : NO. 99-CV-4049 BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION : and MARK REID : MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOYNER, J. January , 2001 This case has been brought before the Court on motion of the defendants for summary judgment. Having now carefully reviewed the record produced by the parties and for the reasons set forth below, the motion shall be granted and judgment in favor of the defendants as a matter of law shall be entered. Factual Background On September 21, 1993, Plaintiff, Terry Mroczek began working as an Employee/Organization Development Specialist in the Human Resources Department at Lukens Steel Company, Bethlehem Steel Corporation’s predecessor-in-interest, in Coatesville, Pennsylvania. At that time, Plaintiff was one of two such specialists in the Human Resources Department working under the direct supervision of Hal King doing employee training, performance management, teams and facilitation. Shortly after Plaintiff was hired, however, Mr. King left Lukens and Plaintiff became one of the members of an eight-member self-directed “OD” team which reported directly to the Vice President of Human Resources, Richard Luzzi.1 Mr. Luzzi directed the self-directed team to elect a leader, and Plaintiff was chosen. Plaintiff was very happy working under Mr. Luzzi, as he gave the team a great deal of freedom and autonomy. Mr. Luzzi, in turn, appeared to be pleased with Plaintiff’s job performance as he gave her ratings of “outstanding” and “excellent” at her annual reviews in September, 1995 and September, 1996.
    [Show full text]