DOCSLIB.ORG

Report on War Crimes Trials in Serbia During 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

REPORT ON WAR CRIMES TRIALS IN SERBIA DURING 2019 ISBN 978-86-7932-109-1 REPORT ON WAR CRIMES TRIALS IN SERBIA DURING 2019 ISBN 978-86-7932-109-1 REPORT ON WAR CRIMES TRIALS IN SERBIA DURING 2019 Belgrade, March 2020 Contents Introduction and methodology .......................................................................................................7 General findings and socio-political context .................................................................................8 Inefficiency of the OWCP ........................................................................................................................ 8 Rulebook on Anonymisation of Personal Data in Indictments of the OWCP ............................ 12 Efficient work of the Higher Court in Belgrade ................................................................................. 15 Deciding on associated action for damages in war crimes proceedings ....................................... 15 Public promotion of convicted war criminals .................................................................................... 17 Pending war crime cases in the War Crimes Department of the Higher Court in Belgrade as the court of first instance ...................................................................................... 20 I. The Bratunac – Suha Case .................................................................................................................. 20 II. The Brčko II Case ............................................................................................................................... 23 III. The Ćuška/Qyshk Case ..................................................................................................................... 27 3 IV. The Doboj – Kožuhe Case ................................................................................................................ 36 V. The Hrasnica Case ............................................................................................................................... 41 VI. The Ključ – Velagići Case ................................................................................................................. 46 VII. The Sanski Most – Lušci Palanka Case ........................................................................................ 51 VIII. The Srebrenica Case ....................................................................................................................... 55 IX. The Štrpci Case .................................................................................................................................. 66 X. The Zvornik – Standard Case ........................................................................................................... 74 First-instance judgments before the Higher Court in Belgrade ............................................... 79 I. The Bosanski Petrovac – Gaj Case ................................................................................................... 79 II. The Bosanska Krupa II Case ............................................................................................................ 85 III. The Bratunac Case ............................................................................................................................. 91 IV. The Brčko Case ................................................................................................................................... 99 Report on War Crimes Trials in Serbia during 2019 V. The Ključ – Rejzovići Case ..............................................................................................................104 VI. The Lovas Case .................................................................................................................................109 Final judgments in cases before the Higher Court in Belgrade............................................... 120 I. The Trnje/Tërrnje Case .....................................................................................................................120 II. The Bosanska Krupa Case ...............................................................................................................129 III. The Ključ-Šljivari Case ....................................................................................................................135 Final judgments in cases before the Court of Appeal in Belgrade .......................................... 140 I. The Skočić Case ..................................................................................................................................140 II. The Ključ-Kamičak Case ..................................................................................................................148 Case in which plea agreement was conducted .......................................................................... 155 I. The Gornje Nerodimlje Case ............................................................................................................155 Proceeding on requestfor recognition and enforcement of foreign judgment 4 in war crimes cases ....................................................................................................................... 159 I. The Novak Đukić Case – Tuzla’s „Kapija“ Case ............................................................................159 Report on War Crimes Trials in Serbia during 2019 Abbreviations used in the text BIH Bosnia and Herzegovina CC FRY Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia ZKP The Criminal Procedure Code ECHR The European Convention on Human Rights ECtHR The European Court of Human Rights EU The European Union HLC The Humanitarian Law Center ICRC The International Committee of the Red Cross ICTY The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia IHL International humanitarian law JNA The Yugoslav People’s Army KLA The Kosovo Liberation Army Law on War Crimes The Law on Organization and Jurisdiction of State Authorities in Prosecuting Perpetrators of War Crimes MUP The Ministry of the Interior OWCP The Office of the War Crimes Prosecutor of the Republic of Serbia 5 RPPO The Office of the Republic Public Prosecutor VJ The Yugoslav Army VRS The Army of the Republic of Srpska Report on War Crimes Trials in Serbia during 2019 Introduction and methodology This is the eighth report of the Humanitarian Law Center (HLC) on war crimes trials in Serbia. The HLC has monitored all war crimes trials conducted in the territory of Serbia during 2019, namely a total of 24 cases conducted before the War Crimes Departments of the Higher Court and the Court of Appeal in Belgrade. The Report provides a brief overview of all the cases and of the HLC’s basic findings in respect of proceedings which are of public relevance. A large number of the war crimes cases covered by this Report have been going on for a number of years now, so that previous HLC Reports on war crimes trials may also be consulted for a full grasp of the course of the proceedings and the relevant HLC findings. The Report focuses on the work of the Office of the War Crimes Prosecutor (OWCP) and the courts in sessions open to the public, primarily analysing the indictments and judgments in each particular case. An analysis of the work of other bodies involved in the prosecution of war crimes – the War Crimes Investigation Service of the Serbian Ministry of the Interior (MUP), the Witness Protection Unit and others, could not be undertaken in respect of the individual cases, as no information on their activities was publicly available. In the reporting period, the War Crimes Department of the Higher Court in Belgrade handed down first-instance judgments in eight cases.1 The War Crimes Department of the Court of Appeal in Belgrade handed down four judgments and one ruling, two of the judgments and the ruling being on 7 appeals lodged against judgments of the Higher Court in Belgrade,2 and the two other judgments on appeals against judgments of the Court of Appeal in Belgrade in proceedings in which the Department decided at third instance.3 Over the reporting period, the OWCP filed three indictments against three individuals.4 Since it began working in 2003 until the end of 2019, the OWCP brought indictments in 76 war crimes cases, indicting a total of 198 persons and encompassing 2,454 victims who lost their lives. Three of the cases were joined with cases instituted earlier, and final rulings were rendered in 49 out of 73 cases; one case was terminated on account of the death of the defendant; in three cases the indictments were dismissed because the defendants had been found unfit to stand trial; and 20 cases are ongoing. In those cases which have been finally concluded, a total of 70 defendants have been convicted and 52 acquitted. Also, indictments were dismissed against 20 out of the total number of the accused, either on account of their incapacity to stand trial, or because proceedings were terminated on account of their deaths. In the finally concluded cases, the indictments listed a total of 925 victims 1 The Lovas, Trnje, Bosanski Petrovac – Gaj, Bratunac, Brčko, Ključ – Rejzovići,Bosanska Krupa II Cases and Gornje Nerodimlje 2 Judgments were rendered in the Ključ – Šljivari and Bosanska Krupa Cases, and the Ruling in the Bosanski Petrovac – Gaj Case. 3 TheKljuč –Kamičak and Skočić Cases. 4 Indictment KTO 1/19 of 10 May 2019 against Dalibor Maksimović, Indictment KTO 2/19 of 26 September 2019 against Dalibor Krstović, Indictment KTO 3/19 of 3 July 2019 against
Recommended publications
  • Review of the Lampreys (Petromyzontidae) in Bosnia and Herzegovina: a Current Status and Geographic Distribution

    Review of the Lampreys (Petromyzontidae) in Bosnia and Herzegovina: a Current Status and Geographic Distribution

    Review of the lampreys (Petromyzontidae) in Bosnia and Herzegovina: a current status and geographic distribution Authors: Tutman, Pero, Buj, Ivana, Ćaleta, Marko, Marčić, Zoran, Hamzić, Adem, et. al. Source: Folia Zoologica, 69(1) : 1-13 Published By: Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences URL: https://doi.org/10.25225/jvb.19046 BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Complete website, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/terms-of-use. Usage of BioOne Complete content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non - commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/Journal-of-Vertebrate-Biology on 13 Feb 2020 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use Journal of Open Acces Vertebrate Biology J. Vertebr. Biol. 2020, 69(1): 19046 DOI: 10.25225/jvb.19046 Review of the lampreys (Petromyzontidae) in Bosnia and Herzegovina:
  • Community Rights Assessment Report Fourth Edition

    Community Rights Assessment Report Fourth Edition

    COMMUNITY RIGHTS ASSESSMENT REPORT FOURTH EDITION NOVEMBER, 2015 Cover photograph: OSCE/Šehida Miftari, March 2015 Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe MISSION IN KOSOVO Community Rights Assessment Report Fourth Edition November, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 5 1. INTER-COMMUNITY DIALOGUE ..................................................................................................... 6 Inter-ethnic dialogue and dealing with the past ................................................................................ 6 Education and dialogue ...................................................................................................................... 7 2. SECURITY AND JUSTICE SYSTEM ..................................................................................................... 9 Security trends and responses ............................................................................................................ 9 Rule of Law ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Property rights and reduction of backlog ......................................................................................... 13 Access to Justice ..............................................................................................................................
  • A-Bohlen.Vp:Corelventura

    A-Bohlen.Vp:Corelventura

    Folia biologica (Kraków), vol. 51 (2003), Supplement Cobitis ohridana and Barbatula zetensis in the River Moraèa Basin, Montenegro: distribution, Habitat, Population Structure and Conservation Needs Jörg BOHLEN, Vendula ŠLECHTOVÁ, Radek ŠANDA, Jörg FREYHOF, Jasna VUKIC, and Danilo MRDAK Accepted April 17, 2003 BOHLEN J., ŠLECHTOVÁ V., ŠANDA R., KALOUS L., FREYHOF J., VUKIC J., MRDAK D. 2003. Cobitis ohridana and Barbatula zetensis in the River Moraèa basin, Montenegro: distribution, habitat, population structure and conservation needs. Folia biol. (Kraków) 51(Suppl.): 147-153. In this paper, we report on the distribution, habitat, population structure and conservation needs of Cobitis ohridana and Barbatula zetensis in the basin of the River Moraèa in Montenegro. Our data show both species to be mainly distributed in the lower stretch of the main river and some tributaries in lowland habitats. Cobitis ohridana preferred more shallow water with a higher abundance of filamentous algae, while Barbatula zetensis was more numerous in slightly deeper water with more stones as a bottom substrate. Slight differences in the habitat preference were also observed between juveniles and adults in both species. Although both species are abundant in suited habitat, they have a small distribution area in the Moraèa basin due to the natural rarity of the habitat. According to our data, they are not endangered. Key words: Balitoridae, Cobitidae, Mediterranean, conservation, habitat preferences, outecology. Jörg BOHLEN, Vendula ŠLECHTOVÁ, Lukáš KALOUS,Institute of Animal Physiology and Ge- netics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 277 21 Libechov, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected] Radek ŠANDA, Charles University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Vinièná 7, 128 44 Prague, Czech Republic; Czech National Museum, Department of Zoology, Václavské námìstí 68, 115 79 Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Miroslav Deronjic, “Bearing in Mind His Genuine Remorse Expressed on Numerous Occasions During His Contacts with OTP Investigators”.521

    Miroslav Deronjic, “Bearing in Mind His Genuine Remorse Expressed on Numerous Occasions During His Contacts with OTP Investigators”.521

    Case No.: IT-02-61-S 30 March 2004 UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-02-61-S Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 30 March 2004 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English IN TRIAL CHAMBER II Before: Judge Wolfgang Schomburg, Presiding Judge Carmel A. Agius Judge Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba Registrar: Mr. Hans Holthuis Judgement of: 30 March 2004 PROSECUTOR v. MIROSLAV DERONJI] SENTENCING JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Mark B. Harmon Counsel for the Accused: Mr. Slobodan Cvijeti} Mr. Slobodan Ze~evi} Case No.: IT-02-61-S 30 March 2004 CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 II. THE ACCUSED.................................................................................................................................. 2 III. PROCEDURAL HISTORY ............................................................................................................. 4 A. OVERVIEW OF THE PROCEEDINGS ....................................................................................................... 4 B. PLEA AGREEMENT .............................................................................................................................. 6 C. TESTIMONY OF THE ACCUSED............................................................................................................. 7 D. SENTENCING HEARING
  • Podgorice, Grade Moj Radile: Popovic Mia, Minic Jana Ix-F Podgorica

    Podgorice, Grade Moj Radile: Popovic Mia, Minic Jana Ix-F Podgorica

    PODGORICE, GRADE MOJ RADILE: POPOVIC MIA, MINIC JANA IX-F PODGORICA . Ime Pogorica dobila je po brdu Gorica, u čijem se podnozju nalazi. Nekoliko puta ime grada je mijenjano: od Birziminijuma i Alate u robovlasničkom poretku, preko predfeudalnog – Ribnica, te feudalnog, našeg i turskog, Podgorica, sve do 1946 kada je ponijela ime Josipa Broza – Tita, tadašnjeg revolcuionara i predsjednika SFRJ i dobila naziv Titograd. 1992 godine Titogradu je vraćeno ime Podgorica, koje i danas nosi. 2 SIMBOLI PODGORICE - Zastava Podgorice, zajedno sa grbom, je simbol grada Podgorice, glavnog grada Crne Gore. Trenutna zastava je na snazi od 2006. godine. Zastava je bijele osnove, sa dvije horizontalne i jednom prelomljenom plavom prugom. Pruge predstavljaju Duklju i Meteon. Metaforički, one predstavljaju temelj današnje Podgorice. Treća, prelomljena linija, predstavlja arhitektonske simbole Podgorice, odnosto most Millenium. - Grb Podgorice je zvanični grb crnogorskog glavnog grada Podgorice, koji je usvojen 30. marta 2006. godine. Autor grba je Srđan Marlović. - Srebrna boja štita predstavlja vodu. Među svim karakteristikama Glavnog grada, najvažnije je bogatstvo vodom (6 reka i Skadarsko jezero, najveće jezero na Balkanu). -Bedemska kruna predstavlja Podgoricu kao glavni grad. - Dva srebrna lava koji pridržavaju grb uzeti su sa najstarijeg poznatog grba Podgorice, onog kojeg je koristio Božidar Vuković-Podgoričanin. - Vinova loza ispod štita i njegovih držača predstavlja vinograde po kojima je podgorički kraj poznat. - Cenar grba ima isti dizajn kao zastava, samim tim I znacenje. 3 OSNOVNE GEOGRAFSKE KARAKTERISTIKE PODGORICE Podgorica je smještena u centralnom dijelu Crne Gore, u predjelu ispresijecanom riječnim koritima. Rijeke Morača i Ribnica protiču kroz sam grad, dok Zeta, Cijevna, Sitnica i Mareza protiču u njegovoj neposrednoj blizini.
  • War Crimes Trials – Still at the Beginnig

    War Crimes Trials – Still at the Beginnig

    HLC Kosovo annual report 2019 WAR CRIMES TRIALS – STILL AT THE BEGINNIG CONTENT List of Acronyms .......................................................................................................323 FOREWORD ............................................................................................................325 War Crimes against the Civilian Population ..............................................................333 1.1. Preliminary procedure .......................................................................................335 1.1.1. The Case: The Prosecutor v. Miloš Petković ...............................................335 1.1.2. The Case: The Prosecutor v. Shemsi Garaj .................................................340 1.1.3. The Case: The Prosecutor v. Zlatan Krstić .................................................344 1.1.4. The Case: The Prosecutor v. Destan Shabanaj ...........................................348 1.1.5. The Case: The Prosecutor v. Goran Stanišić ...............................................353 1.1.6. The Case: The Prosecutor v. Ramiz Džogović ............................................356 1.2. The fisrt instace proceedings ............................................................................361 1.2.1. The Case: The Prosecutor v. Darko Tasić ..................................................365 1.2.2. The Case: The Prosecutor v. Zoran Đokić .................................................376 1.2.3. The Case: The Prosecutor v. Nenad Arsić ..................................................384
  • Bosna I Hercegovina FEDERACIJA BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE

    Bosna I Hercegovina FEDERACIJA BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE

    Bosna i Hercegovina FEDERACIJA BOSNE I Bosnia and Herzegovina FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA FEDERAL MINISTRY OF HERCEGOVINE FEDERALNO MINISTARSTVO DISPLACED PERSONS AND REFUGEES RASELJENIH OSOBA I IZBJEGLICA Broj: 03-36-2-334-5022/19 Sarajevo, 20.05.2020.godine Na osnovu člana 56. Zakona o organizaciji organa uprave u Federaciji BiH („Službene novine Federacije BiH“ broj: 35/05), a u vezi sa objavljenim Javnim pozivom za program pomoći održivog povratka „Podrška zapošljavanju/samozapošljavanju povratnika u poljoprivredi u period 2020. i 2021.godine“, broj: 03-36-2-334-1/19 od 09.12.2019. godine, u skladu sa Procedurama za izbor korisnika za „Program podrške zapošljavanju/samozapošljavanju povratnika u poljoprivredi u periodu 2020. i 2021.godine“, broj: 03-36-2-334-2/19 od 12.12.2019, na prijedlog Komisije za razmatranje prijava po Javnom pozivu, imenovane Rješenjem ministra, broj: 03-36-2-334-3/19 od 12.12.2019.godine, federalni ministar raseljenih osoba i izbjeglica, donosi ODLUKU O UTVRĐIVANJU RANG LISTE POTENCIJALNIH KORISNIKA za program pomoći održivog povratka „Podrška zapošljavanju/samozapošljavanju povratnika u poljoprivredi u periodu 2020. i 2021.godine“ za entitet Republika srpska I Ovom odlukom vrši se rangiranje potencijalnih korisnika pomoći na osnovu ispunjavanja/neispunjavanja općih i posebnih kriterija, odnosno ukupnog broja bodova. II Rang lista potencijalnih korisnika pomoći koji ispunjavaju opće kriterije iz Javnog poziva raspoređenih prema opštinama i programima pomoći kako slijedi: Regija Banja Luka Banja Luka- Mehanizacija RB IME /ime oca/ PREZIME ADRESA GRAD/OPĆINA PROGRAM POMOĆI NAMJENA BODOVI Ivanjska Pezić 1 Pezić/Ilija/Mato Banja Luka 1. Mehanizacija Traktor 40-45 KS polje 60 Čelinac- Finansijska sredstva Čelinac Novac-mašine, oprema 1 Nuhić (Selim) Mujo V.Mišića 44 7.
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina

    Bosnia and Herzegovina

    Bosnia and Herzegovina Haris Kušmić interviewed Jovan Divjak Interview date: 7 August 2019 Kušmić: Allow me to formally introduce myself. I am Haris Kušmić, currently working with the WFD [Westminster Foundation for Democracy]. I am interviewing Mr Jovan Divjak, whose biography I cannot possibly fit into a few opening sentences. Let me instead say something I have said before in conversation with him: that he is someone who has built and defended and given everything he had to this country in periods of both war and peace. Mr Divjak, thank you very much for inviting me here and giving me an opportunity to interview you. Unlike other interviews, the questions here may relate more to your personality. We are certainly going to touch on things that you have gone through, that the general public is familiar with, but the goal of this interview is to try and see Jovan Divjak as Jovan Divjak: you as a person, things you have gone through in your life, from childhood on—which may well be appropriate, as you are working on your book. We hope you will succeed in publishing it. Divjak: And its title is “Do Not Shoot.” Kušmić: And its title is “Do Not Shoot.” Exactly. Well, we can begin with your early life, when you were a child. Could you perhaps tell me something about your childhood? Divjak: Well, my childhood is somewhat fresh in my memory as I often write and speak about it in interviews. I begin with the story of me bringing my parents joy on 11 March 1937.
  • Graduation Ceremony 2015 Third Festival for Children Street Arts Festival in Mostar Community Care Day(S) UWC MOSTAR NEWSLETTER News News UWC MOSTAR NEWSLETTER

    Graduation Ceremony 2015 Third Festival for Children Street Arts Festival in Mostar Community Care Day(S) UWC MOSTAR NEWSLETTER News News UWC MOSTAR NEWSLETTER

    In partnership with The United World College in Mostar 43 Summer – School Year 2014/2015 Graduation Ceremony 2015 Third Festival for Children Street Arts Festival in Mostar Community Care Day(s) UWC MOSTAR NEWSLETTER News News UWC MOSTAR NEWSLETTER “This is not goodbye. We shall again have Summer 2015 issue: Class of 2015 the opportunity to exist a bit longer in hearts of all the people who made this place our home. And just maybe, our true 2 Class of 2015 - Graduation Ceremony - Graduation UWC mission will start once we throw our blue little hats up in the air and venture 4 Conference “Reform of the high school Ceremony out into the unknown. Something big is waiting for us. It's waiting only for us. education in Bosnia and Herzegovina” A wonderful and solemn graduation ceremony Because it's important to pay attention took place on Tuesday, May 26th, 2015 at the HD to the last detail and engrave it into 4 Board meetings of the Foundation memory – deeply, honestly and lovingly. Herceg Stjepan Kosača in Mostar. UWC Mostar “ Education in Action and UWC Mostar said goodbye to the eight generation of students Sara Šepić, BiH, - 79 students from 28 countries of the world. Class of 2015, UWC Mostar 5 The first generation of Endowment eremony programme mances. Ambassador Huseyin Avni Scholars, Class of 2017 included wonderful stu- Botsali and Mr. Emir Gačanin ad- dent performances but dressed the audience with words also guest performanc- of encouragement and wisdom as es by children from this years parent speakers. Guest Cthe refugee camps Tasovčići and of honour was the Mayor of the Salakovac, as well as children from City of Mostar Mr.
  • STREAMS of INCOME and JOBS: the Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins

    STREAMS of INCOME and JOBS: the Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins

    STREAMS OF INCOME AND JOBS: The Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Highlights – The Value of Water for Electricity 5 Highlights – The Value of Water for Agriculture 8 Highlights – The Value of Public Water Supplie 11 Highlights – The Value of Water for Tourism 12 Conclusion: 13 BACKGROUND OF THE BASINS 15 METHODOLOGY 19 LAND USE 21 GENERAL CONTEXT 23 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR ELECTRICITY 29 Background of the Trebišnjica and Neretva hydropower systems 30 Croatia 33 Republika Srpska 35 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 37 Montenegro 40 Case study – Calculating electricity or revenue sharing in the Trebišnjica basin 41 Gap Analysis – Water for Electricity 43 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR AGRICULTURE 45 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 46 Croatia 51 Case study – Water for Tangerines 55 Case study – Wine in Dubrovnik-Neretva County 56 Case study – Wine in Eastern Herzegovina 57 Republika Srpska 57 Gap Analysis – Water for Agriculture 59 Montenegro 59 THE VALUE OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES 63 Republika Srpska 64 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 66 Montenegro 68 Croatia 69 Gap Analysis – Public Water 70 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR TOURISM 71 Croatia 72 CONCLUSION 75 REFERENCES 77 1st edition Author/data analysis: Hilary Drew With contributions from: Zoran Mateljak Data collection, research, and/or translation support: Dr. Nusret Dresković, Nebojša Jerković, Zdravko Mrkonja, Dragutin Sekulović, Petra Remeta, Zoran Šeremet, and Veronika Vlasić Design: Ivan Cigić Published by WWF Adria Supported by the
  • Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB)

    Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB)

    E1468 Consulting Services for Environment Impact Assessment Public Disclosure Authorized in the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB) No. TF052845/GE-P084608 Public Disclosure Authorized F I N A L EIA R E P O R T Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Sarajevo/Banja Luka, August 2006 Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia Proposed Integrated Ecosystem Management of the Nerteva and Trebišnjica River Basin (NTRB) Project Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms EXECUTIVE SUMMARY List of Tables List of Pictures List of Annexes References 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .....................................................................................14 1.1. Background .............................................................................................. 14 1.2. Project objectives..................................................................................... 15 1.3. Project components ................................................................................. 16 2. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ......................................21 2.1. Overall Project Implementation Arrangements....................................... 21 2.2. Requirements of the WB .......................................................................... 22 2.3. Bosnia and Herzegovina environmental policy ........................................ 23 2.4. Legislation of Republic of Croatia ............................................................ 26 2.5. Evaluation of project environmental aspects .................................................27
  • Destruction and Preservation of Cultural Heritage in Former Yugoslavia, Part II

    Destruction and Preservation of Cultural Heritage in Former Yugoslavia, Part II

    Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 29 Issue 1 Article 1 2-2009 Erasing the Past: Destruction and Preservation of Cultural Heritage in Former Yugoslavia, Part II Igor Ordev Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Slavic Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Ordev, Igor (2009) "Erasing the Past: Destruction and Preservation of Cultural Heritage in Former Yugoslavia, Part II," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 29 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol29/iss1/1 This Article, Exploration, or Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ERASING THE PAST: DESTRUCTION AND PRESERVATION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE IN FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Part II (Continuation from the Previous Issue) By Igor Ordev Igor Ordev received the MA in Southeast European Studies from the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece. Previously he worked on projects like the World Conference on Dialogue Among Religions and Civilizations held in Ohrid in 2007. He lives in Skopje, Republic of Macedonia. III. THE CASE OF KOSOVO AND METOHIA Just as everyone could sense that the end of the horrifying conflict of the early 1990s was coming to an end, another one was heating up in the Yugoslav kitchen. Kosovo is located in the southern part of former Yugoslavia, in an area that had been characterized by hostility and hatred practically ‘since the beginning of time.’ The reason for such mixed negative feelings came due to the confusion about who should have the final say in the governing of the Kosovo principality.