Siuslaw National Forest 1990 Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Siuslaw National Forest 1990 Plan Unk?d States Department of agriculture Land and Resource ? aclflc ibihwest Management Plan Pegion as0 Siuslaw National Forest LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN for the SIUSLAW NATIONAL FOREST Pacific Northwest Region Lead Agency: USDA Forest Semce Responsible Official: John Butrulle Regmnal Forester Pack Northwest Region For Further Information Forest Supernor Siuslaw NatIonal Forest 4077 SW Research Way P.O. Box 1148 Comlhs, OR 97339 Telephone. (503) 750-7000 PREFACE l’hm Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan) has been prepared according to Secretary of Agriculture regulations (36 CFR 219) which are based OII the For& and Bangeland Renewable Resources Plannmg Act (BPA) as amended by the NatIonal Forest Management Act of 1976 (NFMA). The plan has also been developed in accordance with regulations (40 CFR 1500) for implementmg the National Enwronmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) Because this plan is considered a ma..or federal action svgokantly affecting the quahty of the human environment, a detailed statement (environmental impact statement) has been prepared as required by NEPA. The Forest Plan represents the implementation of the Preferred Alternative as identified in the Fmal Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Forest Plan If any parkular provision of this Forest Plan, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances, 1s found to be invalid, the remainder of the Forest Plan and the apphcatlon of that provlslon to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected l-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PREFACE . i-l LIST OF TABLES . i-5 LIST OF FIGURES . i-6 CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION Purpose . I-l Plan Relationship to Other Documents . I-l Plan structure . I-2 Forest OveMew . I-3 CHAPTER II - SUMMARY OF THE ANALYSIS OF THE MANAGEMENT SITUATION Introduction . II-1 Resourceand EconomtcPotentlaIs . II-1 Key Issue Discussion . II-2 Akrnatrves m Relation to Supply and Demand II-4 Demand Projectmns . II-5 InformatIonal Needs . II-8 CHAPTER III - RESPONSE TO ISSUES, CONCERNS, AND OPPORTUNITIES Introduction . ......... III-1 Issues . .......... III-1 CHAPTER IV - FOREST MANAGEMENT DIRECTION Introduction ............... IV-1 Forest Management Goals ........ IV-1 Dewed Future Condnion of the Forest .... IV-4 Forest Management Objectives ........ IV-I Resource Summaries . IV-10 Timber ........ : : : : : : : : : : . IV-10 Recreation ............ IV-22 Wdderness ........... IV-25 Vwal Resources ......... IV-26 Undeveloped Areas ...... IV-27 Wddhfe Habitat ........ IV-27 Watershed Condition and Fish Habitat ... IV-34 pansportation Fachties ......... IV-35 ResearchOpportunities ... IV-36 Rivers Included m the Natlonal Rivers Inventory IV-36 Cultural Resources ............ IV-36 Range ................. IV-37 Insects and Disease ........ IV-37 Landownership ......... IV-37 SIUSLAW NATIONAL FOREST PLAN i-3 Municipal Watersheds .............. IV-37 Electronic Sites ................ IV-38 Rights-of-&y .................. IV-38 Forest-wide Standards and Guidelines ......... IV-39 Project Planning and Implementation ....... IV-39 Recreation .................... IV-40 Cultural Resources ................ IV-42 Visual Quality .................. IV-43 Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive AniialsandPlants . IV-43 Wildlife ............... : : : .. : . : : : : . IV-47 Ftsh ....................... IV-48 Riparian Areas .................. IV-49 Range ...................... IV-SO Timber ...................... IV-SO Soil and Water .................. IV-51 Municipal Watersheds ............... IV-S4 Mmerals and Geology ............... IV-S4 Research ................... IV-55 Lands .................... IV-55 ?fansportation .................. IV-S6 Protection ..................... IV-S7 Air Quality ................... IV-58 Facihties .................. IV-58 Management Area Prescriptions ......... , . IV-59 Management Area Boundaries .... IV-59 Management AreaModificatton ...... IV-59 Management Area 1 - Silverspot Butterfly Habitat . IV-62 Management Area 2 - Old Growth .......... , . IV-66 Management Area 3 - Northern Spotted Owl Habltat . IV-69 Management Area 4 - Bald Eagle Habttat ....... IV-73 Management Area5 - SpecialInterestAreas ...... IV-76 Management Area 6 - Cascade Head Scenic ResearchArea . IV-81 Management Area 7 - Cascade Head Experimental Forest . IV-85 Management Area 8 -Sand Lake ......... IV-87 Management Area 9 - Sutton Area ........ IV-89 Management Area 10 - Oregon Dunes NRA ... IV-93 Management Area 11 - Undeveloped Areas .... IV-96 Management Area 12 - Wdderness ....... IV-99 Management Area 13 - ResearchNatural Areas ..... IV-104 Management Area 14 -Scenic VIewsheds ..... IV-108 Management Area 15 - Tunber/Wtldhfe/Fsh/ Dispersed Recreatton .............. IV-112 i-4 SIUSLAW NATIONAL FOREST PLAN CHAPTER V - IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING Implementation Direction . V-l Project Scheduling . V-l Consistency With Other Instruments . v-2 Budget Proposals . v-2 Environmental Analysis . v-3 Momtormg and Evaluation . v-3 Monitoring . v-3 Evaluation . ‘v-45 Amendmentsand Renslons . v-4.5 Plan Amendments . v-4.5 PlanRevwons. V-46 REFERENCES . REF-1 ACRONYMS . : : : : : : : : : : : : . : . : . ACR-1 GLOSSARY . GLOS-1 APPENDICES A- Timber Sale Schedule . A-l B - Other Resource Schedules . B-l B-l Watershed Actwq Schedule . B-l B-2 Fish Activity Schedule . B-3 B-3 Wddhfe Activity Schedule . B-5 B-4 Recreation Actlwty Schedule B-9 B-5 ‘&adActivity Schedule . B-11 B-6 Road Actlvlty Schedule . B-13 B-7 Bridge Activity Schedule . B-16 B-8 Facdities Actlvlty Schedule . B-17 C - LandownershIp Adjustment Plan . c-1 D - Road and Area Closure Plan . D-l SIUSLAW NATIONAL FOREST PLAN i-5 LIST OF TABLES Page II-1 Decision Space and Demand Projecttons for Major IssuesIndicators . II-6 III-1 Allocated and Managed Old-Growth Stands,Acres . III-3 IV-1 Projected Average Annual Resource Outputs, Activities, and Costs . IV-7 IV-2 Lands Suitable for Tnnber Production, Acres ..... ... IV-11 IV-3 Management Area Land Stratification for Tnnber Production ... IV-13 IV-4 Characteristics of LandsSuitable forTimber Production ...... IV-14 IV-5 ASQ and tiber Sale Program Quantny ........... IV-15 IV-6 Distribution of Annual Timber Harvest by Ranger Datrtct ..... IV-17 IV-7 Distribution of Annual Timber Harvest ........ ... IV-19 IV-8 Vegetation Management Practices .......... ... IV-20 IV-9 Management of LandsSuitable forTtmber Production ...... IV-21 IV-10 Forest Vegetative Condttions ............. IV-22 IV-11 Needed Developed Stte Capacity ............... IV-23 IV-12 Wndemess ‘Rail Miles ...... ............ IV-25 IV-13 Viewshed Visual Quahty ObIectives ......... IV-26 IV-14 Habnat Areas and Acres in Mature Comfer ........... IV-28 IV-15 Spotted Owl Habitat Areas (SOHAs) ........... IV-29 IV-16 Spotted Owl Habitat by MA ................ IV-29 IV-17 Bald Eagle Habitat by MA .................. IV-32 IV-18 Prolected Operational Status of Forest Road System . IV-36 IV-19 Descnption and Stse of Each Management Area ...... IV-60 IV-20 Resources (Chapter-III Issues) Lmked wtth Management Areas . IV-61 IV-21 Wilderness Prrmmveness,‘ Ball Mdes, Recreatton Capaaty . IV-102 V-l Monitoring Questions-Cultural Resources . V-6 V-2 Monitormg Questions - Economtc and Social . v-7 V-3 Monitoring Questions- Fish . : ‘v-10 V-4 Monitoring Questions - Recreatton and Scenery . v-12 V-S Monitoring Questions-Research Natural Areas . V-16 V-6 Monitoring Questions-Sod and Water . v-17 V-7 Monitoring Questions-Timber . v-22 V-8 Momtoring Questions-Transportatton . V-27 V-9 Momtormg Questions - Wddhfe . V-28 A-l Timber Sale Schedule _ Ftscal Year 1990 . A-2 A-2 TimberSaleSchedule-FrscalYear 1991 . A-6 A-3 Timber Sale Schedule - Frscal Year 1992 . A-10 i-6 SIUSLAW NATIONAL FOREST PLAN - LIST OF TABLES (continued) Page B-l WatershedAct&y Schedule . B-2 B-2 Fish Activtty Schedule . B-2 B-3 Wrldhfe Activity Schedule . : ’ . B-5 B-4 Recreation Activity Scheduleand Associated Road Projects . B-7 B-5 Ikarl Actwity Schedule . B-9 B-6 Road Activity Schedule . B-11 B-7 Bridge Activity Schedule . B-13 B-8 Facllittes Activity Schedule . B-14 Cl Approxtmate Acreagesfor Acquisttion and Disposition . c-2 C-2 ManagementAreas and LandownershipGroups . c-3 D-l Restrtctions on the Use of Motor Vehiclesm Forest Areas . D-4 D-2 ‘Bails Closed to Motor Vehtcles . 1.. D-5 D-3 Roads Closed toMotor Vehtcles . D-6 LIST OF FIGURES I-l Locanon of thesmslaw Nattonal Forest . I-5 II-1 Benchmark Dectsron Spacefor Malor Indtcators ............. II-2 IV-l ASQ and LTSYC by Decade ............... IV-16 IV-2 SpottedOwlHabnat Areas ............ ’ IV-30 V-l Decrsion Flow Diagram for the Evaluatron of theForest Plan .......... V-45 SIUSLAW NATIONAL FOREST PLAN 1-7 - CHAPTER I Introduction CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION PURPOSE The Forest Land and Resource Management Plan guides all natural resource management a&vi&s and establishes management standards and gtudelmes for the Smslaw Natmnal Forest It describes resource management practices, levels of resource production and management, and the avadablhty and smtabxhty of lands for resource management The Forest Plan estabhshes. Forest-mde multiple-use goals and ObJectlves, . Forest-wide standards and guldehnes to fulfill reqmrements of the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) applymg to future actlvltles, . Management area dire&on mcludmg management area prescnptmns and standards and gmdehnes applying to future management actlvltles m specific management areas; . Allowable timber sale quantity and deslgnatmn of land smtable for timber management; . Momtonng and evaluation
Recommended publications
  • City of Yachats FY2020-21 Adopted Budget
    City of Yachats FY2020-21 Adopted Budget City of Yachats Annual Budget Fiscal Year July 1, 2020 – June 30, 2021 CITY COUNCIL W. John Moore, Mayor Max Glenn, Council President James Tooke, Council Member Leslie Vaaler, Council Member Mary Ellen O’Shaughnessey, Council Member BUDGET COMMITTEE – CITIZEN MEMBERS Lance Bloch Don Groth Dawn Keller John Purcell Brad Webb CITY STAFF Shannon Beaucaire, City Manager Kimmie Jackson, Deputy Recorder David Buckwald, Wastewater Lead Rick McClung, Water Lead www.yachatsoregon.org 2 of 108 City of Yachats FY2020-21 Proposed Budget Table of Contents Reader's Guide: How to Make the Most of the Budget Document ......................................................................... 6 City of Yachats Budget Message ............................................................................................................................... 7 About the City of Yachats ........................................................................................................................................ 29 Yachats Vision Statement ....................................................................................................................................... 30 Council Goals ........................................................................................................................................................... 30 Revenue............................................................................................................................................................... 31
    [Show full text]
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2019 Forest Service WO Lands FS-383 November 2019 Metric Equivalents When you know: Multiply by: To fnd: Inches (in) 2.54 Centimeters Feet (ft) 0.305 Meters Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers Acres (ac) 0.405 Hectares Square feet (ft2) 0.0929 Square meters Yards (yd) 0.914 Meters Square miles (mi2) 2.59 Square kilometers Pounds (lb) 0.454 Kilograms United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS-383 System November 2019 As of September 30, 2019 Published by: USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250-0003 Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover Photo: Mt. Hood, Mt. Hood National Forest, Oregon Courtesy of: Susan Ruzicka USDA Forest Service WO Lands and Realty Management Statistics are current as of: 10/17/2019 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 192,994,068 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 503 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service administers 149 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 456 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States. The Forest Service also administers several other types of nationally designated
    [Show full text]
  • Botany, Invasive Plants, Native Plants, Genetics
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest FY-16 Region Program Accomplishments Calochortus umpquaensis, Umpqua mariposa lily, is found only in the Umpqua River watershed of Botany southwestern OR. A big "anthophorid" bee is tucked into the flower. Invasive Plants Native Plants Genetics U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bill to Designate Certain National Forest System Lands in the State of Oregon for Inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and for Other Purposes
    97 H.R.7340 Title: A bill to designate certain National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and for other purposes. Sponsor: Rep Weaver, James H. [OR-4] (introduced 12/1/1982) Cosponsors (2) Latest Major Action: 12/15/1982 Failed of passage/not agreed to in House. Status: Failed to Receive 2/3's Vote to Suspend and Pass by Yea-Nay Vote: 247 - 141 (Record Vote No: 454). SUMMARY AS OF: 12/9/1982--Reported to House amended, Part I. (There is 1 other summary) (Reported to House from the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs with amendment, H.Rept. 97-951 (Part I)) Oregon Wilderness Act of 1982 - Designates as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System the following lands in the State of Oregon: (1) the Columbia Gorge Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (2) the Salmon-Huckleberry Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (3) the Badger Creek Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (4) the Hidden Wilderness in the Mount Hood and Willamette National Forests; (5) the Middle Santiam Wilderness in the Willamette National Forest; (6) the Rock Creek Wilderness in the Siuslaw National Forest; (7) the Cummins Creek Wilderness in the Siuslaw National Forest; (8) the Boulder Creek Wilderness in the Umpqua National Forest; (9) the Rogue-Umpqua Divide Wilderness in the Umpqua and Rogue River National Forests; (10) the Grassy Knob Wilderness in and adjacent to the Siskiyou National Forest; (11) the Red Buttes Wilderness in and adjacent to the Siskiyou
    [Show full text]
  • THE Easrsrne Group
    Group One: THE NORTHERN IU Alaska ~ <, 1 Port Houghton-Cape Fanshaw 2 East Kuiu 3 Cleveland Peninsula 4 Upper Tenakee Inlet British Columbia 5 Great Bear Rainforest 6 Randy Stoltmann Wilderness Group Two: THE OwL REGION Washington 7 Pompey 8 Paradise Creek 9 Little Huckleberry Mountain Oregon 10 Salmon-Huckleberry 11 Hardesty Mountain 12 Smith-Umpqua Divide 13 Mount Bailey 14 Copper /North Fork Elk River California 15 Dillon Creek/Siskiyou 16 Orleans Mountain Group Three: THE EAsrsrnE Washington 17 Long Draw/Long Swamp 18 Devil's Gulch Oregon 19 Aldrich Mountain/Dry Cabin 20 North Fork John Day/Elkhorn/Greenhorn 21 Sky Lakes/Pelican Butte 22 Deadhorse Rim/Coleman Rim Northern Great Basin Oregon 23 High Steens/Little Blitzen Gorge 24 Trout Creek Mountains Oregon-Idaho 25 Owyhee Canyon Group Four: NORTHERN RocK1Es Idaho 26 Deadwood 27 French Creek/Patrick Butte 28 North Lochsa Slope 29 Cove-Mallard 30 Mount Jefferson Montana 31 Great Burn 32 Ninemile Valley ROADLESS AREAS AT RISK A Ca~cadia Sampler project, which would have built 93 miles of chum salmon. Goose Flats River, on the inlet's What's at stake: The Stoltmann har• road and cut 123 million board feet of timber south side, harbors brown bear, mink, marten bors the southern limit of North America's from the area, was withdrawn as the result of and Sitka black-tailed deer and draws large coas ta I grizzly bear population. a lawsuit. A new draft EIS is in the early plan• numbers of migrating waterfowl. Beautiful Status: Only 20 percent of this wilderness is ning stages.
    [Show full text]
  • OR Wild -Backmatter V2
    208 OREGON WILD Afterword JIM CALLAHAN One final paragraph of advice: do not burn yourselves out. Be as I am — a reluctant enthusiast.... a part-time crusader, a half-hearted fanatic. Save the other half of your- selves and your lives for pleasure and adventure. It is not enough to fight for the land; it is even more important to enjoy it. While you can. While it is still here. So get out there and hunt and fish and mess around with your friends, ramble out yonder and explore the forests, climb the mountains, bag the peaks, run the rivers, breathe deep of that yet sweet and lucid air, sit quietly for awhile and contemplate the precious still- ness, the lovely mysterious and awesome space. Enjoy yourselves, keep your brain in your head and your head firmly attached to the body, the body active and alive and I promise you this much: I promise you this one sweet victory over our enemies, over those desk-bound men with their hearts in a safe-deposit box and their eyes hypnotized by desk calculators. I promise you this: you will outlive the bastards. —Edward Abbey1 Edward Abbey. Ed, take it from another Ed, not only can wilderness lovers outlive wilderness opponents, we can also defeat them. The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men (sic) UNIVERSITY, SHREVEPORT UNIVERSITY, to do nothing. MES SMITH NOEL COLLECTION, NOEL SMITH MES NOEL COLLECTION, MEMORIAL LIBRARY, LOUISIANA STATE LOUISIANA LIBRARY, MEMORIAL —Edmund Burke2 JA Edmund Burke. 1 Van matre, Steve and Bill Weiler.
    [Show full text]
  • Or Wilderness-Like Areas, but Instead Declassified Previously Protected Wildlands with High Timber Value
    48 OREGON WILD A Brief Political History of Oregon’s Wilderness Protections Government protection should be thrown around every wild grove and forest on the Although the Forest Service pioneered the concept of wilderness protection in the mountains, as it is around every private orchard, and trees in public parks. To say 1920s and 1930s, by the late 1940s and 1950s, it was methodically undoing whatever nothing of their values as fountains of timber, they are worth infinitely more than all good it had done earlier by declassifying administrative wilderness areas that contained the gardens and parks of town. any commercial timber. —John Muir1 Just prior to the end of its second term, and after receiving over a million public comments in support of protecting national forest roadless areas, the Clinton Administration promulgated a regulation (a.k.a. “the Roadless Rule”) to protect the Inadequacies of Administrative remaining unprotected wildlands (greater than 5,000 acres in size) in the National Forest System from road building and logging. At the time, Clinton’s Forest Service Protections chief Mike Dombeck asked rhetorically: here is “government protection,” and then there is government protection. Mere public ownership — especially if managed by the Bureau of Is it worth one-quarter of 1 percent of our nation’s timber supply or a fraction of a Land Management — affords land little real or permanent protection. fraction of our oil and gas to protect 58.5 million acres of wild and unfragmented land T National forests enjoy somewhat more protection than BLM lands, but in perpetuity?2 to fully protect, conserve and restore federal forests often requires a combination of Wilderness designation and additional appropriate congressional Dombeck’s remarks echoed those of a Forest Service scientist from an earlier era.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 98-328-June 26, 1984
    98 STAT. 272 PUBLIC LAW 98-328-JUNE 26, 1984 Public Law 98-328 98th Congress An Act June 26, 1984 To designate certain national forest system and other lands in the State of Oregon for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System, and for other purposes. [H.R. 1149] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Oregon United States ofAmerica in Congress assembled, That this Act may Wilderness Act be referred to as the "Oregon Wilderness Act of 1984". of 1984. National SEc. 2. (a) The Congress finds that- Wilderness (1) many areas of undeveloped National Forest System land in Preservation the State of Oregon possess outstanding natural characteristics System. which give them high value as wilderness and will, if properly National Forest preserved, contribute as an enduring resource of wilderness for System. the ben~fit of the American people; (2) the Department of Agriculture's second roadless area review and evaluation (RARE II) of National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon and the related congressional review of such lands have identified areas which, on the basis of their landform, ecosystem, associated wildlife, and location, will help to fulfill the National Forest System's share of a quality National Wilderness Preservation System; and (3) the Department of Agriculture's second roadless area review and evaluation of National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon and the related congressional review of such lands have also identified areas which do not possess outstand­ ing wilderness attributes or which possess outstanding energy, mineral, timber, grazing, dispersed recreation and other values and which should not now be designated as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System but should be avail­ able for nonwilderness multiple uses under the land manage­ ment planning process and other applicable laws.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Oregon Big Game Hunting Outlook Conditions for Big Game and Hunters Are Looking Much Better Than They Were a Year Ago
    2016 Oregon Big Game Hunting Outlook Conditions for big game and hunters are looking much better than they were a year ago. Back in August of last year, 100 percent of Oregon was in severe drought and 50 percent in the even worse category of “extreme drought.” While parts of NE and SE Oregon are still experiencing a severe drought, conditions have improved across the state. “We had normal winter precipitation and a wet spring,” says Autumn Larkins, ODFW Assistant District Wildlife Biologist for Harney County. “Water availability is much better this year.” It’s a similar story in northeast Oregon. “The weather is much better suited to deer and elk production as opposed to last year’s record drought,” said Mark Kirsch, ODFW District Wildlife Biologist in Umatilla County. The increased water also better distribute animals during hunting season, rather than cluster them around fewer water sources. It should help distribute early season hunters, too— especially those pronghorn and bowhunters who crowded around the few water holes to set hunting blinds in recent years. The conflict between hunters over blind placement has gotten so bad that ODFW and BLM recently put together a flyer reminding hunters of the rules and good etiquette Now wildlife biologists are crossing their fingers for rains in September. These early fall rains green up forage and help big game put on weight, so animals head into breeding season in good body condition and fit to reproduce. Despite the increased moisture, fire is still a threat throughout Oregon. Most forestlands will have restrictions (such as no campfires) during fire season, and some private lands will be closed to public access entirely.
    [Show full text]
  • Stewardship in the Siuslaw National Forest Whole Watershed Restoration for Ecological and Economic Benefit
    Stewardship in the Siuslaw National Forest Whole watershed restoration for ecological and economic benefit The end result of stewardship and restoration in the Siuslaw National Forest is healthy forests and restored fish and wildlife habitat. History of Stewardship on the Siuslaw What is Stewardship Contracting? Home to Oregon’s fastest growing trees and threatened Stewardship contracting began in the Siuslaw in 2001 as a salmon, spotted owls and marbled murrelets, the Siuslaw “pilot project” for new federal authorities. In 2003, Congress National Forest on the Oregon coast saw some of the most authorized stewardship contracting for 10 more years. bitter battles over old-growth logging in the Pacific North- west twenty years ago. Stewardship contracting is a suite of authorities and con- tracting tools that are intended Action needed After the Northwest Forest Plan went into effect in 1994, to help the Forest Service and forest planners were required to preserve more old-growth Bureau of Land Management The success of 10 years of and riparian habitat for wildlife. Managers at the Siuslaw meet both land management stewardship contracting in National Forest saw an opportunity to advance forest stew- objectives and rural community the Siuslaw highlights the ardship and meet restoration, conservation and economic needs. The blending of these importance of gaining per- goals through new “Stewardship Authorities.” This provided objectives makes stewardship manent authorization from an opening to pursue a new type of management and to work contracting
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]
  • South Central Coast Section of Oregon Chart 3
    Human Use and Management Chart Series South Central Coast Section of Oregon Chart 3 124°50'W 124°45'W 124°40'W 124°35'W 124°30'W 124°25'W 124°20'W 124°15'W 124°10'W 124°5'W 124°0'W 123°55'W 123°50'W 5 -7 -7 5 Alsea Bay - 1 0 0 -1 00 - 50 Alsea River -75 0 -5 Waldport 0 N 50 ' - y r 5 2 5 a ° 7 0 d - 34 4 -5 n 4 u 0 o -5 B N a ' e 0 - - 5 7 S 2 7 7 5 - l ° - 5 5 7 a 4 7 5 - i r 4 5 o t 7 i - r r e T -75 -75 0 0 5 5 - -100 - - 5 75 -12 0 -10 Smelt Sands -7 A17 5 Perpetua Bank N ' 0 2 ° Yachats 4 Yachats Marine Garden 4 -1 0 0 N ' 5 5 - 1 7 2 ° - 5 4 -75 4 Yachats Ocean Rd State Wayside Cape Perpetua Lincoln County - - Cape Perpetua Marine Garden 10 1 -75 0 0 00 0 -1 -10 5 0 7 -100 - 0 Neptune State Park 0 Neptune 1 - Intertidal Research Reserve State Park -10 0 5 -7 - 1 0 - 1 0 -75 0 - -10 0 10 0 0 0 0 -1 Strawberry Hill 0 0 1 Cummins Creek Wilderness - Lane County - 1 0 Bob Creek 0 -100 -1 00 N ' 5 5 1 7 ° - -1 00 4 4 -75 5 7 - N - -100 7 ' 5 0 5 1 Stonefield Beach State Park ° 7 - 4 4 A18 - 125 - -100 125 5 -7 Rock Creek Wilderness -125 -125 5 -100 7 - -75 N ' 0 d -12 1 n 5 ° u 4 o 4 R - -1 r 0 a 0 e Devil's Elbow State Park N ' Carl G Washburne Memorial Y 5 ° 0 - 1 5 4 -125 - State Park 0 4 -125 0 - 125 -125 -125 -125 Sea Lion Point 0 0 -1 5 - - 12 1 1 - - 2 12 5 2 5 5 -12 5 - 12 5 5 2 0 A19 1 0 - 1 - -1 00 -125 A20 -1 25 Sutton Lake ACEC -125 N ' 5 ° - - 4 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 -125 Sutton Lake N ' d 0 n ° Marsh Preserve u 4 o 4 36 R - - r 1 a 2 125 e 5 5 - Y 2 -1 -125 0 0 1 - -1 25 5 -12 126 d n u o R - r a e 126 Y - Heceta Valley 1 2 Siuslaw
    [Show full text]