DOCSLIB.ORG

Browder's Theorem Through Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem Arxiv:2107.02428V1 [Math.GN] 6 Jul 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Browder's Theorem Through Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem Arxiv:2107.02428V1 [Math.GN] 6 Jul 2021 Browder's Theorem through Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem∗ Eilon Solan and Omri N. Solan† July 7, 2021 Abstract One of the conclusions of Browder (1960) is a parametric version of Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem, stating that for every continuous function f : ([0; 1] × X) ! X, where X is a simplex in a Euclidean space, the set of fixed points of f, namely, the set f(t; x) 2 [0; 1] × X : f(t; x) = xg, has a connected component whose projection on the first coordinate is [0; 1]. Browder's (1960) proof relies on the theory of the fixed point index. We provide an alternative proof to Browder's result using Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem. Keywords: Browder's Theorem, fixed points, connected component. MSC2010: 55M20. 1 Introduction Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem (Hadamard, 1910, Brouwer, 1911) states arXiv:2107.02428v1 [math.GN] 6 Jul 2021 that every continuous function from a finite dimensional simplex into itself has a fixed point. This result was later generalized to nonempty, convex, and compact subsets of more general topological vector spaces, see, e.g., Schauder (1930), Tychonoff (1935), and Dyer (1956). ∗The first author acknowledges the support of the Israel Science Foundation, Grant #217/17. †The School of Mathematical Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997800, Israel. e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]. 1 The following parametric version of Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem is a special case of a more general result of Browder (1960). To state the theorem we need the concept of connected component. A set A ⊆ Rn is connected if there are no two disjoint open sets O1;O2 that satisfy (a) A ⊆ O1 [ O2, (b) A 6⊆ O1, and (c) A 6⊆ O2. A subset B of A is a connected component of A if every connected subset of A is either contained in B or disjoint of B. Theorem 1.1 (Browder, 1960) Let f : ([0; 1] × X) ! X be a continuous function, where X = [0; 1]n. Define the set of fixed points of f by Cf := f(t; x) 2 [0; 1] × X : f(t; x) = xg: (1) Then Cf has a connected component whose projection to the first coordinate is [0; 1]. Example 1.2 Let X = [−1; 1], and f : [0; 1] × X ! X be given by x t = 0; f(t; x) := 1 (1 − t)x + t sin( t ) t 6= 0: 1 The set Cf is the union of f(0; x): x 2 [−1; 1]g and f(t; sin( t )): t 2 (0; 1]g, which is connected (but not path connected). Theorem 1.1 was used in a variety of topics, like nonlinear complemen- tarity theory (see, e.g., Eaves, 1971, or Allgower and Georg, 2012), nonlinear elliptic boundary value problems (Shaw, 1977), the study of global continua of solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations (see, e.g., Costa and Gon¸calves, 1981, or Massabo and Pejsachowitz, 1984), theoretical economics (Citanna et al., 2001), and game theory (see, e.g., Herings and Peeters, 2010, or Solan and Solan, 2021). Browder's (1960) proof of Theorem 1.1 uses the fixed point index,1 and hence is not accessible to many researchers, and cannot be taught in an undergraduate course in topology. In this paper we prove Theorem 1.1 using Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem. In particular, our proof is accessible to all mathematicians, and can be taught in any course in which Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem is proved. In Section 3 we discuss extensions of Theorem 1.1 to more general parameter sets and more general sets X. 1In fact, the statement of Browder's (1960) more general version of Theorem 1.1 is phrased using the fixed point index. 2 Theorem 1.1 easily follows from Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem when the 2 number of connected components of Cf is finite. As the next example shows, the number of connected components of Cf may not be finite or countable. Example 1.3 Recall that the Cantor set K is the set of all real numbers in [0; 1] such that, in their representation in base 3, appear only the digits 0 and 2. The cardinality of the Cantor set is the continuum, and its complement is a union of countably many open intervals. Let g : [0; 1] ! [0; 1] be the function that is the identity on K, and, on each maximal open subinterval (a; b) of [0; 1] in the complement of K it is given by g(x) = x+(x−a)(b−x), see Figure 1. The function g is continuous, its range is [0; 1], and its set of fixed points is K. Define now a function f : [0; 1] × [0; 1] ! [0; 1] by f(t; x) = g(x) for every (t; x) 2 [0; 1] × [0; 1]. The connected components of Cf are then all sets of the form [0; 1] × fxg for x 2 K. g(x) 1 0 x 10 Figure 1: The function g in Example 1.3. 2 Proof of Theorem 1.1 In this section we prove Theorem 1.1. The theorem will follow from Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem once we prove the following two results. 2In this case, our Proposition 2.1 is trivial, hence the proof reduces to our Proposi- tion 2.2. 3 Proposition 2.1 If Cf has no connected component whose projection on the first coordinate is [0; 1], then there are two disjoint open sets O0 and O1 that satisfy the following properties: (C1) The sets O0 and O1 cover Cf , that is, Cf ⊆ O0 \ O1. (C2) Every connected component B of Cf that satisfies B \ (f0g × X) 6= ; is a subset of O0. (C3) Every connected component B of Cf that satisfies B \ (f1g × X) 6= ; is a subset of O1. Proposition 2.2 If there are two disjoint open sets O0 and O1 that satisfy (C1){(C3), then there is a continuous function F : ([0; 1]×X) ! ([0; 1]×X) that has no fixed point. To see that the two propositions imply Theorem 1.1, note that the con- clusion of Proposition 2.2 contradicts Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem, hence Proposition 2.2 implies that there are no two disjoint open sets O0 and O1 that satisfy (C1){(C3). Hence Proposition 2.1 implies that Cf has a con- nected component whose projection on the first coordinate is [0; 1]. As Example 1.2 shows, connected components of Cf may be complicated sets, and as Example 1.3 shows, the number of connected components of Cf may be of the order of the continuum. In particular, the condition that Cf has no connected component whose projection on the first coordinate is [0; 1] is difficult to use. Proposition 2.1 turns the contrapositive assumption of Theorem 1.1 into a seemingly stronger condition that is easier to use. The proof of Proposotion 2.1 is the more challenging part of the proof of Theorem 1.1, and it goes through the following steps. • For every k 2 N we will approximate Cf by a \simple" set Sk. We will 1 do that by covering [0; 1] × X with finitely many boxes of diameter 2k , and defining Sk to be the union of all boxes that intersect Cf . • We will then prove that if Cf has no connected component whose pro- jection on the first coordinate is [0; 1], then there is k such that Sk has no connected component whose projection on the first coordinate is [0; 1]. 4 • Since Sk is the union of finitely many boxes, if it has no connected component whose projection on the first coordinate is [0; 1], then the existence of two disjoint open sets O0 and O1 that satisfy (C1){(C3) w.r.t. Sk (rather than Cf ) is clear. Since Sk ⊇ Cf , Proposition 2.1 follows. 2.1 Proof of Proposition 2.1 The maximum norm in Rn is given by 0 0 0 n d1(y; y ) := max jyi − yij; 8y; y 2 R : i=1;:::;n In the proof we will use the distance between a point and a set and the distance between two sets: for every two sets A; A0 ⊆ Rn and every point y 2 Rn, 0 0 0 d1(y; A) := inf d1(y; y ); d1(A; A ) := inf d1(y; y ): y02A y2A;y02A0 We will also use the Hausdorff distance between sets: 0 0 0 dH (A; A ) := max sup d1(y; A ); sup d1(y ;A) : y2A y02A0 Qn+1 For every k 2 N, let Tk be the collection of all boxes i=1 [ai; bi] ⊆ n+1 [0; 1] where ai and bi are rational numbers that are integer multiples of 1 2k . We note that Tk+1 refines Tk: every set T 2 Tk+1 is a subset of some set T 0 2 T . Let k [ Sk := fT 2 Tk : T \ Cf 6= ;g: This is the union of all boxes in Tk that contain points in Cf , see Figure 2, where the set Cf has three connected components. In particular, Sk ⊇ Cf . Since Tk+1 refines Tk, we have Sk+1 ⊆ Sk. X 10 5 Figure 2: The boxes in Tk and the sets Cf (dark) and Sk (grey). Lemma 2.3 If there is k 2 N such that Sk has no connected component whose projection on the first coordinate is [0; 1], then there are two disjoint open sets O0 and O1 that satisfy (C1){(C3).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Boundary Manifold of a Complex Line Arrangement
    Geometry & Topology Monographs 13 (2008) 105–146 105 The boundary manifold of a complex line arrangement DANIEL CCOHEN ALEXANDER ISUCIU We study the topology of the boundary manifold of a line arrangement in CP2 , with emphasis on the fundamental group G and associated invariants. We determine the Alexander polynomial .G/, and more generally, the twisted Alexander polynomial associated to the abelianization of G and an arbitrary complex representation. We give an explicit description of the unit ball in the Alexander norm, and use it to analyze certain Bieri–Neumann–Strebel invariants of G . From the Alexander polynomial, we also obtain a complete description of the first characteristic variety of G . Comparing this with the corresponding resonance variety of the cohomology ring of G enables us to characterize those arrangements for which the boundary manifold is formal. 32S22; 57M27 For Fred Cohen on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday 1 Introduction 1.1 The boundary manifold Let A be an arrangement of hyperplanes in the complex projective space CPm , m > 1. Denote by V S H the corresponding hypersurface, and by X CPm V its D H A D n complement. Among2 the origins of the topological study of arrangements are seminal results of Arnol’d[2] and Cohen[8], who independently computed the cohomology of the configuration space of n ordered points in C, the complement of the braid arrangement. The cohomology ring of the complement of an arbitrary arrangement A is by now well known. It is isomorphic to the Orlik–Solomon algebra of A, see Orlik and Terao[34] as a general reference.
    [Show full text]
  • Graph Manifolds and Taut Foliations Mark Brittenham1, Ramin Naimi, and Rachel Roberts2 Introduction
    Graph manifolds and taut foliations 1 2 Mark Brittenham , Ramin Naimi, and Rachel Roberts UniversityofTexas at Austin Abstract. We examine the existence of foliations without Reeb comp onents, taut 1 1 foliations, and foliations with no S S -leaves, among graph manifolds. We show that each condition is strictly stronger than its predecessors, in the strongest p os- sible sense; there are manifolds admitting foliations of eachtyp e which do not admit foliations of the succeeding typ es. x0 Introduction Taut foliations have b een increasingly useful in understanding the top ology of 3-manifolds, thanks largely to the work of David Gabai [Ga1]. Many 3-manifolds admit taut foliations [Ro1],[De],[Na1], although some do not [Br1],[Cl]. To date, however, there are no adequate necessary or sucient conditions for a manifold to admit a taut foliation. This pap er seeks to add to this confusion. In this pap er we study the existence of taut foliations and various re nements, among graph manifolds. What we show is that there are many graph manifolds which admit foliations that are as re ned as wecho ose, but which do not admit foliations admitting any further re nements. For example, we nd manifolds which admit foliations without Reeb comp onents, but no taut foliations. We also nd 0 manifolds admitting C foliations with no compact leaves, but which do not admit 2 any C such foliations. These results p oint to the subtle nature b ehind b oth top ological and analytical assumptions when dealing with foliations. A principal motivation for this work came from a particularly interesting exam- ple; the manifold M obtained by 37/2 Dehn surgery on the 2,3,7 pretzel knot K .
    [Show full text]
  • A TEXTBOOK of TOPOLOGY Lltld
    SEIFERT AND THRELFALL: A TEXTBOOK OF TOPOLOGY lltld SEI FER T: 7'0PO 1.OG 1' 0 I.' 3- Dl M E N SI 0 N A I. FIRERED SPACES This is a volume in PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS A Series of Monographs and Textbooks Editors: SAMUELEILENBERG AND HYMANBASS A list of recent titles in this series appears at the end of this volunie. SEIFERT AND THRELFALL: A TEXTBOOK OF TOPOLOGY H. SEIFERT and W. THRELFALL Translated by Michael A. Goldman und S E I FE R T: TOPOLOGY OF 3-DIMENSIONAL FIBERED SPACES H. SEIFERT Translated by Wolfgang Heil Edited by Joan S. Birman and Julian Eisner @ 1980 ACADEMIC PRESS A Subsidiary of Harcourr Brace Jovanovich, Publishers NEW YORK LONDON TORONTO SYDNEY SAN FRANCISCO COPYRIGHT@ 1980, BY ACADEMICPRESS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO PART OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE REPRODUCED OR TRANSMITTED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANS, ELECTRONIC OR MECHANICAL, INCLUDING PHOTOCOPY, RECORDING, OR ANY INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, WITHOUT PERMISSION IN WRITING FROM THE PUBLISHER. ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. 11 1 Fifth Avenue, New York. New York 10003 United Kingdom Edition published by ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. (LONDON) LTD. 24/28 Oval Road, London NWI 7DX Mit Genehmigung des Verlager B. G. Teubner, Stuttgart, veranstaltete, akin autorisierte englische Ubersetzung, der deutschen Originalausgdbe. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Seifert, Herbert, 1897- Seifert and Threlfall: A textbook of topology. Seifert: Topology of 3-dimensional fibered spaces. (Pure and applied mathematics, a series of mono- graphs and textbooks ; ) Translation of Lehrbuch der Topologic. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • General Topology
    General Topology Tom Leinster 2014{15 Contents A Topological spaces2 A1 Review of metric spaces.......................2 A2 The definition of topological space.................8 A3 Metrics versus topologies....................... 13 A4 Continuous maps........................... 17 A5 When are two spaces homeomorphic?................ 22 A6 Topological properties........................ 26 A7 Bases................................. 28 A8 Closure and interior......................... 31 A9 Subspaces (new spaces from old, 1)................. 35 A10 Products (new spaces from old, 2)................. 39 A11 Quotients (new spaces from old, 3)................. 43 A12 Review of ChapterA......................... 48 B Compactness 51 B1 The definition of compactness.................... 51 B2 Closed bounded intervals are compact............... 55 B3 Compactness and subspaces..................... 56 B4 Compactness and products..................... 58 B5 The compact subsets of Rn ..................... 59 B6 Compactness and quotients (and images)............. 61 B7 Compact metric spaces........................ 64 C Connectedness 68 C1 The definition of connectedness................... 68 C2 Connected subsets of the real line.................. 72 C3 Path-connectedness.......................... 76 C4 Connected-components and path-components........... 80 1 Chapter A Topological spaces A1 Review of metric spaces For the lecture of Thursday, 18 September 2014 Almost everything in this section should have been covered in Honours Analysis, with the possible exception of some of the examples. For that reason, this lecture is longer than usual. Definition A1.1 Let X be a set. A metric on X is a function d: X × X ! [0; 1) with the following three properties: • d(x; y) = 0 () x = y, for x; y 2 X; • d(x; y) + d(y; z) ≥ d(x; z) for all x; y; z 2 X (triangle inequality); • d(x; y) = d(y; x) for all x; y 2 X (symmetry).
    [Show full text]
  • Homology Groups of Homeomorphic Topological Spaces
    An Introduction to Homology Prerna Nadathur August 16, 2007 Abstract This paper explores the basic ideas of simplicial structures that lead to simplicial homology theory, and introduces singular homology in order to demonstrate the equivalence of homology groups of homeomorphic topological spaces. It concludes with a proof of the equivalence of simplicial and singular homology groups. Contents 1 Simplices and Simplicial Complexes 1 2 Homology Groups 2 3 Singular Homology 8 4 Chain Complexes, Exact Sequences, and Relative Homology Groups 9 ∆ 5 The Equivalence of H n and Hn 13 1 Simplices and Simplicial Complexes Definition 1.1. The n-simplex, ∆n, is the simplest geometric figure determined by a collection of n n + 1 points in Euclidean space R . Geometrically, it can be thought of as the complete graph on (n + 1) vertices, which is solid in n dimensions. Figure 1: Some simplices Extrapolating from Figure 1, we see that the 3-simplex is a tetrahedron. Note: The n-simplex is topologically equivalent to Dn, the n-ball. Definition 1.2. An n-face of a simplex is a subset of the set of vertices of the simplex with order n + 1. The faces of an n-simplex with dimension less than n are called its proper faces. 1 Two simplices are said to be properly situated if their intersection is either empty or a face of both simplices (i.e., a simplex itself). By \gluing" (identifying) simplices along entire faces, we get what are known as simplicial complexes. More formally: Definition 1.3. A simplicial complex K is a finite set of simplices satisfying the following condi- tions: 1 For all simplices A 2 K with α a face of A, we have α 2 K.
    [Show full text]
  • Math 396. Interior, Closure, and Boundary We Wish to Develop Some Basic Geometric Concepts in Metric Spaces Which Make Precise C
    Math 396. Interior, closure, and boundary We wish to develop some basic geometric concepts in metric spaces which make precise certain intuitive ideas centered on the themes of \interior" and \boundary" of a subset of a metric space. One warning must be given. Although there are a number of results proven in this handout, none of it is particularly deep. If you carefully study the proofs (which you should!), then you'll see that none of this requires going much beyond the basic definitions. We will certainly encounter some serious ideas and non-trivial proofs in due course, but at this point the central aim is to acquire some linguistic ability when discussing some basic geometric ideas in a metric space. Thus, the main goal is to familiarize ourselves with some very convenient geometric terminology in terms of which we can discuss more sophisticated ideas later on. 1. Interior and closure Let X be a metric space and A X a subset. We define the interior of A to be the set ⊆ int(A) = a A some Br (a) A; ra > 0 f 2 j a ⊆ g consisting of points for which A is a \neighborhood". We define the closure of A to be the set A = x X x = lim an; with an A for all n n f 2 j !1 2 g consisting of limits of sequences in A. In words, the interior consists of points in A for which all nearby points of X are also in A, whereas the closure allows for \points on the edge of A".
    [Show full text]
  • Definition 1. a Manifold with Boundary Is a (Hausdorff, Second Countable) Topological Space X Such That ∀X ∈ X There Exists
    Definition 1. A manifold with boundary is a (Hausdorff, second countable) topological space X such that 8x 2 X there exists an open U 3 x and a n n−1 homeomorphism φU : U ! R or a homeomorphism φU : U ! R≥0 × R . Informally, a manifold is a space where every point has a neighborhood homeomorphic to Euclidean space. Think about the surface of the earth. Locally when we look around it looks like R2, but globally it is not. The surface of the earth is, of course, homeomorphic to the space S2 of unit vectors in R3. If a point has a neighborhood homeomorphic to Rn then it turns out intuition is correct and n is constant on connected components of X. Typically n is constant on all of X and is called the dimension of X. A manifold of dimension n is called an \n-manifold." The boundary of the manifold X, denoted @X, is the set of points which n−1 only admit neighborhoods homeomorphic to R≥0 × R . For example, here's a (2-dimensional) manifold with boundary: : (1) The point x is in the interior (it has a neighborhood homeomorphic to R2) and the point y is on the boundary (it has a neighborhood homeomorphic to R≥0 × R.) The term \manifold with boundary" is standard but somewhat confusing. It is possible for a \manifold with boundary" to have empty boundary, i.e., no boundary. I will simply say \manifold" to mean \manifold with boundary." All manifolds are going to be compact. A manifold is called \closed" if it is compact and without boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • On Manifolds with Corners, and Orientations on fibre Products of Manifolds
    On manifolds with corners Dominic Joyce Abstract Manifolds without boundary, and manifolds with boundary, are uni- versally known and loved in Differential Geometry, but manifolds with k n−k corners (locally modelled on [0, ∞) ×R ) have received comparatively little attention. The basic definitions in the subject are not agreed upon, there are several inequivalent definitions in use of manifolds with corners, of boundary, and of smooth map, depending on the applications in mind. We present a theory of manifolds with corners which includes a new notion of smooth map f : X → Y . Compared to other definitions, our c theory has the advantage of giving a category Man of manifolds with corners which is particularly well behaved as a category: it has products and direct products, boundaries ∂X behave in a functorial way, and there c are simple conditions for the existence of fibre products X ×Z Y in Man . Our theory is tailored to future applications in Symplectic Geometry, and is part of a project to describe the geometric structure on moduli spaces of J-holomorphic curves in a new way. But we have written it as a separate paper as we believe it is of independent interest. 1 Introduction Most of the literature in Differential Geometry discusses only manifolds without boundary (locally modelled on Rn), and a smaller proportion manifolds with boundary (locally modelled on [0, ∞)×Rn−1). Only a few authors have seriously studied manifolds with corners (locally modelled on [0, ∞)k ×Rn−k). They were first developed by Cerf [1] and Douady [2] in 1961, who were primarily interested in their Differential Geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapters 4 (Pdf)
    This is page 142 Printer: Opaque this This is page 143 Printer: Opaque this CHAPTER 4 FORMS ON MANIFOLDS 4.1 Manifolds Our agenda in this chapter is to extend to manifolds the results of Chapters 2 and 3 and to formulate and prove manifold versions of two of the fundamental theorems of integral calculus: Stokes’ theorem and the divergence theorem. In this section we’ll define what we mean by the term “manifold”, however, before we do so, a word of encouragement. Having had a course in multivariable calculus, you are already familiar with manifolds, at least in their one and two dimensional emanations, as curves and surfaces in R3, i.e., a manifold is basically just an n-dimensional surface in some high dimensional Euclidean space. To make this definition precise let X be a subset of RN , Y a subset of Rn and f : X Y a continuous map. We recall → Definition 4.1.1. f is a ∞ map if for every p X, there exists a C ∈ neighborhood, U , of p in RN and a ∞ map, g : U Rn, which p C p p → coincides with f on U X. p ∩ We also recall: Theorem 4.1.2. If f : X Y is a ∞ map, there exists a neigh- → C borhood, U, of X in RN and a ∞ map, g : U Rn such that g C → coincides with f on X. (A proof of this can be found in Appendix A.) We will say that f is a diffeomorphism if it is one–one and onto and f and f −1 are both ∞ maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Homework 5. Solutions
    Homework 5. Solutions 1. Find the interior, the closure and the boundary of the following sets. You need not justify your answers. 2 2 2 A = (x,y) ∈ R : xy ≥ 0 , B = (x,y) ∈ R : y 6= x . The set A is closed, so it is equal to its own closure, while ◦ 2 A = (x,y) ∈ R : xy > 0 , 2 ∂A = (x,y) ∈ R : xy = 0 . The set B is open, so it is equal to its own interior, while 2 2 2 B = R , ∂B = (x,y) ∈ R : y = x . Homework 5. Solutions 2. Let (X,T ) be a topological space and let A ⊂ X. Show that ∂A = ∅ ⇐⇒ A is both open and closed in X. If A is both open and closed in X, then the boundary of A is ∂A = A ∩ X − A = A ∩ (X − A)= ∅. Conversely, suppose that ∂A = ∅. Then Theorem 2.6 implies that ◦ A = A. Since A◦ ⊂ A ⊂ A by definition, these sets are all equal, so ◦ A = A = A =⇒ A is both open and closed in X. Homework 5. Solutions 3. Consider R with its usual topology. Find a set A ⊂ R such that A and its interior A◦ do not have the same closure. If A is any nonempty set whose interior is empty, then ◦ A = ∅ =⇒ A◦ = ∅. On the other hand, A cannot be empty since A ⊂ A by definition. Some typical examples are thus sets A = {x} that only contain one element, sets A = {x1,x2,...,xn} that contain finitely many elements, or even A = Z and A = Q. All of these sets have empty interior because none of them contains an open interval.
    [Show full text]
  • HOMOTOPY THEORY for BEGINNERS Contents 1. Notation
    HOMOTOPY THEORY FOR BEGINNERS JESPER M. MØLLER Abstract. This note contains comments to Chapter 0 in Allan Hatcher's book [5]. Contents 1. Notation and some standard spaces and constructions1 1.1. Standard topological spaces1 1.2. The quotient topology 2 1.3. The category of topological spaces and continuous maps3 2. Homotopy 4 2.1. Relative homotopy 5 2.2. Retracts and deformation retracts5 3. Constructions on topological spaces6 4. CW-complexes 9 4.1. Topological properties of CW-complexes 11 4.2. Subcomplexes 12 4.3. Products of CW-complexes 12 5. The Homotopy Extension Property 14 5.1. What is the HEP good for? 14 5.2. Are there any pairs of spaces that have the HEP? 16 References 21 1. Notation and some standard spaces and constructions In this section we fix some notation and recollect some standard facts from general topology. 1.1. Standard topological spaces. We will often refer to these standard spaces: • R is the real line and Rn = R × · · · × R is the n-dimensional real vector space • C is the field of complex numbers and Cn = C × · · · × C is the n-dimensional complex vector space • H is the (skew-)field of quaternions and Hn = H × · · · × H is the n-dimensional quaternion vector space • Sn = fx 2 Rn+1 j jxj = 1g is the unit n-sphere in Rn+1 • Dn = fx 2 Rn j jxj ≤ 1g is the unit n-disc in Rn • I = [0; 1] ⊂ R is the unit interval • RP n, CP n, HP n is the topological space of 1-dimensional linear subspaces of Rn+1, Cn+1, Hn+1.
    [Show full text]
  • SEPARATION of the «-SPHERE by an (N - 1)-SPHERE by JAMES C
    SEPARATION OF THE «-SPHERE BY AN (n - 1)-SPHERE BY JAMES C. CANTRELL(i) 1. Introduction. Let A be the closed spherical ball in E" centered at the origin 0, and with radius one, B the closed ball centered at O with radius one-half, and C the closed ball centered at O with radius two. The Generalized Schoenflies Theorem states that, if h is a homeomorphism of Cl (C —B) into S", then h(BdA) is tame in S" (the closure of either component of S" —h(BdA) is a closed n-cell) [5]. One is naturally led to the following question : if h is a homeomorphism of C\(A—B) into S", is the closure of the component of S" — h(BdA) which contains n(BdB) a closed n-cell? This question is answered affirmatively by Theorem 1 and should be listed as a corollary to the Generalized Schoenflies Theorem. Let D be the closed ball in E", centered at (0,0,-",0, — 1) with radius two. Two other types of embeddings of Bd.4 in S", n > 3, are considered in §2, (1) the embedding homeomorphism h can be extended to a homeomorphism of Cl(£>— B) into S" such that the extension is semi-linear on each finite polyhedron in the open annulus Int (A — B), and (2) h can be extended to a homeomorphism of C1(B —A) into S" such that the extension is semi-linear in a deleted neigh- borhood of (0, 0, ■■■,(), 1) (see Definition 1). Theorem 4 strongly suggests that, for an embedding of type (1), h(BdA) is tame in S".
    [Show full text]