This Is Your Future
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2021 Microsoft Partner of the Year Award Winners and Finalists
2021 Microsoft Partner of the Year Award Winners and Finalists The Microsoft Partner of the Year Awards acknowledge outstanding achievements and innovations from across our global partner ecosystem. This impressive group of partners and their solutions demonstrates amazing agility and creativity in building new technologies across the intelligent cloud to edge, all with the goal of exceeding customer expectations by bringing technology to life in meaningful ways. This year’s group of winners and finalists is an inspiring reflection of the impact our partner ecosystem enables through the innovative technologies they continue to build for our mutual customers. Across categories including Azure, Modern Work & Security, and Social Impact, our partners are dedicated to helping customers solve challenges and truly work to support our mission to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. Congratulations to this year’s winners and finalists, which have shown exceptional expertise, dedication to our customers, and care for our world through a year of change. Table of contents Partner of the Year Awards: Category Winners • Azure • Business Applications • Modern Work & Security • Industry • Social Impact • Business Excellence Category Finalists Country/Region Winners 2021 Microsoft Partner of the Year Award Winners – Category Azure 2021 Microsoft Partner of the Year Award Winners – Category 2021 Microsoft Partner of the Year Award Winners – Category Azure AI Icertis United States www.icertis.com Icertis’ strategic bet with Microsoft on Azure AI is delivering strong customer success and leadership positioning in the contract lifecycle management market. Hundreds of customers have been empowered through over 10 million contracts valued at more than $1 trillion, and in 40+ languages across 90+ countries. -
2018 Performance Related Share Grant
October 3, 2018 Grant of performance shares to Corporate executive officers The Board of Directors of Capgemini SE, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, has decided during its meeting on October 3, 2018, to grant a total of 1 384 530 performance shares of the company Capgemini SE to employees and corporate officers of the Company and its French and foreign subsidiaries. Out of this total, reduced versus last year due to the share price evolution, 61 000 performance shares have been granted to Mr. Paul Hermelin, Chairman and CEO, and to Messrs. Thierry Delaporte and Aiman Ezzat, Chief Operating Officers, as follows: Board of Directors decision on As a reminder 03.10.2018 2018 % of the total 2017 % of the (total number of authorized (total number of shares total shares granted) amount * granted) authorized amount Mr. P. Hermelin 28 000 35,000 2.07% Chairman and CEO Mr. T. Delaporte 16 500 3,62% n/a n/a Chief Operating Officer Mr. A. Ezzat 16 500 n/a n/a Chief Operating Officer * Ceiling of 10% of the maximum allocation authorized by the Shareholders' Meeting of May 23, 2018 (23rd resolution) for the total allocation to Corporate executive officers For each of the Corporate executive officers, the final vesting of the shares, after a three-years acquisition period, is subject to the completion of the following performance conditions: • A market performance condition (35%) based on the comparative performance of the Capgemini SE share against the average performance of a basket of eight comparable companies in the same business -
2014 Registration Document Annual Financial Report Contents
2014 REGISTRATION DOCUMENT ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CONTENTS 1 4 Presentation of the Company Financial Information 129 and its activities 5 4.1 Analysis on Capgemini 2014 Group consolidated 1.1 Milestones in the Group’s history and its values 6 results AFR 130 1.2 The Group’s activities 8 4.2 Consolidated accounts AFR 136 1.3 Main Group subsidiaries and simplified 4.3 Comments on the Cap Gemini S.A. Financial organization chart 13 Statements AFR 195 1.4 The market and the competitive environment 15 4.4 Cap Gemini S.A. financial statements AFR 197 1.5 2014, a year of strong growth 17 4.5 Other financial and accounting information AFR 221 1.6 The Group’s investment policy, financing policy and market risks AFR 25 1.7 Risk analysis AFR 26 5 CAP GEMINI and its shareholders 223 2 5.1 Cap Gemini S.A. Share Capital AFR 224 5.2 Cap Gemini S.A. and the stock market 229 Corporate governance 5.3 Current ownership structure 233 and Internal control 33 5.4 Share buyback program AFR 235 2.1 Organization and activities of the Board of Directors AFR 35 6 2.2 General organization of the Group AFR 54 2.3 Compensation of executive corporate officers AFR 58 2.4 Internal control and risk management Report of the Board of Directors procedures AFR 70 and draft resolutions 2.5 Statutory Auditors’ report prepared in accordance with Article L.225-235 of the French Commercial of the Combined Shareholders’ Code on the report prepared by the Chairman Meeting of May 6, 2015 237 of the Board of Directors AFR 79 6.1 Resolutions presented at the Ordinary Shareholders’ -
Cognizant—2019 Proxy Statement & Annual Meeting Notice
2019Proxy Statement & Notice of Annual Meeting Proxy Guide 1 Chairman’s Letter 4 Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting 5 Corporate Governance 5 Governance Highlights 20 Committees of the Board 6 Board Overview 22 Human Capital Management and Talent Development 8 Proposal 1 Election of Directors 23 Commitment to Corporate Sustainability 8 Director Nominees 25 Director Compensation 14 Building an Experienced, Qualified and Diverse Board 26 Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions 18 Director Selection and Voting Process 27 Stock Ownership and Reporting Corporate Governance Corporate 19 Risk Oversight 28 Compensation 35 Primary Compensation Elements 38 Compensation by Individual 28 Company Performance Snapshot 47 Other Elements of Compensation 29 Proposal 2 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation 48 Company Policies Impacting Compensation (Say-on-Pay) 49 Compensation Committee Report 29 Compensation Discussion and Analysis 50 Executive Compensation Tables and Pay Ratio 30 Compensation Program Objectives Compensation 55 Potential Payments Upon Termination or 31 Compensation Structure Overview Change in Control 33 Compensation Setting Process 58 Audit Matters 58 Proposal 3 Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 59 Auditor Fees 59 Audit Committee Report Audit Matters WHY ARE WE SENDING YOU THESE MATERIALS? On behalf of our board of directors, we are 60 Shareholder Proposals making these materials available to you 60 Proposal 4 Shareholder Proposal Regarding (beginning on April 18, 2019) in connection Political Disclosure with Cognizant’s solicitation of proxies for our 62 Proposal 5 Shareholder Proposal Regarding 2019 annual meeting of shareholders. Independent Board Chairman 64 Shareholder Proposals and Nominees for the WHAT DO WE NEED FROM YOU? 2020 Annual Meeting Please read these materials and submit Shareholder Proposals your vote and proxy using the Internet, by telephone or, if you received your materials by 65 Additional Information mail, you can also complete and return your proxy by mail. -
Enabling Ubiquitous Buying Via Multichannel Fulfillment
• Cognizant IBM Sterling Practice Overview Enabling Ubiquitous Buying via Multichannel Fulfillment Achieving True Multichannel Unique Nature of the Practice The retail landscape has changed dramatically over By remaining focused within the IBM Sterling com- the last few years, becoming increasingly complex merce space and seamlessly leveraging our vast as the “customer experience” spreads across capabilities in the areas of enterprise business retail channels. Customers today are “window- process consulting, change management, design, shopping” — researching, comparing and buying development, testing and QA among other areas, products online — and picking up or returning the our IBM Sterling commerce practice affords our product at stores. With the emergence of social customers an intimate consulting experience nor- and mobile commerce, customers want a seamless mally found in boutique consulting firms, but with shopping experience across channels. the added depth and breadth of a Tier 1 company. This cross-channel experience can be enabled We have some of the best IBM Sterling talent and only when there is a “buy anywhere, fulfill specialists — some with decades of implementa- anywhere” ability. tion experience. We team them up with business consultants who were retailers in the past and with IBM Sterling has a unique combination of powerful other IT practitioners with global project delivery capabilities: enterprise-wide inventory visibility; expertise. This combination of expertise can map a sophisticated order management mechanism retailer needs to the IBM Sterling product, suggest that can spawn multiple fulfillment channels; best practices and successfully implement in a inventory tracking across the entire supply chain; cost-optimized global delivery model. Our IBM and integration with multiple order capture Sterling practice is able to provide end-to-end systems. -
GETTING AHEAD in CYBER RISK a Differentiated Approach for Communications, Media and Technology Providers
GETTING AHEAD IN CYBER RISK A differentiated approach for Communications, Media and Technology providers KEY TAKEAWAYS Companies in the Communications, Media and Technology (CMT) industry, especially in the 1 telecommunications sector, operate across multiple technology platforms and jurisdictions, exposing them to wide-ranging cyber risks. The industry often acts as a conduit for information and transaction flows and forms a fundamental component of other key sectors, making it a particularly attractive target. Business interruptions and reputational damage are perceived to be the most critical cyber 2 loss scenarios for CMT companies and their stakeholders. A cyber incident can cause significant financial losses stemming from service disruption, as well as loss of trust due to breach of customer privacy. In the case of reputational damage, on average it is much more pronounced for the CMT industry than other industries. In the face of a cyberattack, the CMT industry is perceived to incur the highest financial cost 3 across all surveyed industries. Among cyber threats, financially-motivated ones are the biggest concern for CMT companies. As shown by results of the latest Marsh Microsoft Global Cyber Risk Perception Survey, more than 80 percent of respondents from the CMT industry expect a cyber breach to cost them more than $1 million per case, as compared to a cross-industry average of 65 percent.1 Proactive measures are needed to increase the visibility of cyber risk issues within CMT 4 companies, and cyber risk management should be made a shared responsibility across the firm. While the risks have been recognized by the industry, more can be done by CMT companies to establish and implement a holistic framework, encompassing cyber hygiene, governance, quantification of risks, and adequate board oversight. -
The Forrester Wave™: Microsoft Dynamics 365 Services, Q2 2019 the 12 Providers That Matter Most and How They Stack up by Leslie Joseph May 21, 2019
LICENSED FOR INDIVIDUAL USE ONLY The Forrester Wave™: Microsoft Dynamics 365 Services, Q2 2019 The 12 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up by Leslie Joseph May 21, 2019 Why Read This Report Key Takeaways In our 23-criterion evaluation of Microsoft Avanade, HCL Technologies, And PwC Lead Dynamics 365 service providers, we identified the The Pack 12 most significant ones — Avanade, Cognizant, Forrester’s research uncovered a market in DXC Technology, HCL Technologies, Hitachi which Avanade, HCL Technologies, and PwC Solutions, IBM, Infosys, KPMG, PwC, Sonata are Leaders; DXC Technology, Hitachi Solutions, Software, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), and Infosys, KPMG, and Sonata Software are Strong Wipro — and researched, analyzed, and scored Performers; and Cognizant, IBM, TCS, and Wipro them. This report shows how each provider are Contenders. measures up and helps application development Business Consulting, Cloud, And Delivery and delivery professionals select the right one for Excellence Are Key Differentiators their needs. As Microsoft Dynamics evolves into a business applications platform, breadth of consulting and delivery capabilities and depth in intellectual property (IP) and domain knowledge will dictate which providers will lead the pack. Vendors that can provide these capabilities position themselves to successfully deliver Microsoft Dynamics services to their customers for high business impact at low risk. This PDF is only licensed for individual use when downloaded from forrester.com or reprints.forrester.com. All -
Everest Group PEAK Matrix™ for Devops Service Providers 2019
® Everest Group PEAK Matrix™ for DevOps Service Providers 2019 Focus on Capgemini September 2019 ® ™ Copyright © 2019 Everest Global, Inc. This document has been licensed for exclusive use and distribution by Capgemini EGR-2019-32-E-3316 Introduction and scope Everest Group recently released its report titled “DevOps Services PEAK Matrix™ Assessment and Market Trends 2019 – Siloed DevOps is No DevOps! ” This report analyzes the changing dynamics of the DevOps services landscape and assesses service providers across several key dimensions. As a part of this report, Everest Group updated its classification of 20 service providers on the Everest Group PEAK Matrix™ for DevOps services into Leaders, Major Contenders, and Aspirants. The PEAK Matrix is a framework that provides an objective, data-driven, and comparative assessment of DevOps service providers based on their absolute market success and delivery capability. Based on the analysis, Capgemini emerged as a Leader. This document focuses on Capgemini’s DevOps services experience and capabilities and includes: ⚫ Capgemini’s position on the DevOps PEAK Matrix ⚫ Detailed DevOps services profile of Capgemini Buyers can use the PEAK Matrix to identify and evaluate different service providers. It helps them understand the service providers’ relative strengths and gaps. However, it is also important to note that while the PEAK Matrix is a useful starting point, the results from the assessment may not be directly prescriptive for each buyer. Buyers will have to consider their unique situation and requirements, and match them against service provider capability for an ideal fit. Source: Everest Group (2019) unless cited otherwise ® Copyright © 2019, Everest Global, Inc. -
IDC Marketscape Names Accenture a Digital Strategy Leader | Accenture
IDC MarketScape IDC MarketScape: Worldwide Digital Strategy Consulting Services 2021 Vendor Assessment Douglas Hayward IDC MARKETSCAPE FIGURE FIGURE 1 IDC MarketScape Worldwide Digital Strategy Consulting Services Vendor Assessment Source: IDC, 2021 June 2021, IDC #US46766521 Please see the Appendix for detailed methodology, market definition, and scoring criteria. IDC OPINION This study represents the vendor assessment model called IDC MarketScape. This research is a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the characteristics that explain a vendor's current and future success in the digital strategy consulting services marketplace. This study assesses the capabilities and business strategies of 13 prominent digital strategy consulting services vendors. This evaluation is based on a comprehensive framework and a set of parameters expected to be most conducive to success in providing digital strategy consultancy. A significant component of this evaluation is the inclusion of digital strategy consulting buyers' perception of both the key characteristics and the capabilities of these providers. This client input was provided primarily from the vendors' clients, supplemented with a worldwide survey. Key findings include: . Consultancies are getting the basics right. Reference clients that IDC spoke with were impressed by the quality of the people from the leading digital strategy consultancies. On average, reference clients gave consultancies highest scores for people quality, action orientation, and client-specific insight. This indicates that digital strategy consultancies are getting the basics right — they are recruiting smart and empathetic people and are training and developing them well, they are getting to know their clients inside out, and they are producing very useful advice as a result. Clients want to be challenged more than ever by their digital strategy consultants. -
COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 0-24429 COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Delaware 13-3728359 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.) 300 Frank W. Burr Blvd. Teaneck, New Jersey 07666 (Address of Principal Executive Offices including Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (201) 801-0233 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Trading Symbol(s) Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share CTSH The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☒ Yes ☐ No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. -
The Capgemini Time
1967 2015 The Capgemini Time 1967 1975 The Start of an Entrepreneurial Adventure 1 October 1967. Serge Kampf creates Sogeti, an IT services company, in Grenoble, France. A year later he opens offices in Switzerland to meet the needs of a client. Sogeti rapidly expands, first in the provinces and then in Paris, in 1969. The spirit of conquest is already established! 1970: the Group diversifies, first intoconsulting and then outsourcing, 20 years ahead of its competitors. 1974: With the acquisition of Cap and Gemini Computer Systems, Sogeti becomes a truly European company and enters the era of large IT systems. 1975: the Cap Gemini Sogeti Group is born. Two years later, the leading European IT services company, with nearly 2,000 employees, enters the United States, the country posting the Group’s best growth today. 1976 1989 Growth and Expansion At the forefront of innovation, the Group plays a major role in creating the French electronic directory, the largest IT system distributed across the world. The Group relies on large and small shareholders to assist its development. Among the most significant, CGIP, which enters the capital in 1982, remains a loyal supporter for more than 20 years. The information contained in the document is proprietary and confidential. It is for Capgemini internal use only. ©2015 Capgemini. All rights reserved. 12 June 1985: the Group is floated on the Paris Stock Exchange. The share price increases by 25% in 5 days and 5 months later Serge Kampf establishes the Group’s headquarters at the prestigious Place de l’Etoile in Paris. -
Everest Group PEAK Matrix for Insurance Analytics and Insights (AI) Third-Party Services 2020
Everest Group PEAK Matrix® for Insurance Analytics and Insights (A&I) Third-party Service Providers 2020 Focus on Cognizant August 2020 Copyright © 2020 Everest Global, Inc. This document has been licensed for exclusive use and distribution by Cognizant EGR-2020-28-E-3907 Insurance Analytics and Insights (A&I) Third-party Services PEAK Matrix® Assessment 2020 Background and methodology of the research In recent times, insurance Analytics & Insights (A&I) has emerged as a fast-growing, high-potential market. Insurance enterprises are looking beyond traditional data management services to focus on customer experience. To tap into the dynamically changing consumer needs of today and optimize their product portfolios with targeted offerings, insurers have started leveraging third-party support for analytics services. Service providers, in turn, have started investing in advanced analytics, in addition to visualization and reporting services. In this research, we present detailed assessments of 17 insurance A&I service providers, based on their vision, capabilities, and market impact, and look at their relative positioning on the Everest Group PEAK Matrix® for Insurance A&I Services. Our assessment is based on Everest Group’s annual RFI process for H2 2019, interactions with leading insurance A&I service providers, client reference checks, and an ongoing analysis of the insurance A&I services market. This report features 17 insurance A&I service provider profiles, each of which includes: ⚫ Relative positioning of the service provider on Everest