The Case of Fiji and Japan

Fiji Islander trans-border mobility in the Pacific: The case of Fiji and Japan Dominik Schieder1 1 University of Siegen, Department of Social Sciences, Adolf-Reichwein-Str. 2, 57068 Siegen, Germany DOI: 10.23791/561322 Abstract: This article is concerned with Fiji Islanders in Japan. Its objective is to introduce a to date little explored case of Pacific Islander trans-border mobility within the Pacific region. After providing a general overview of the topic, it discusses two of the main reasons why Fiji Islanders spend shorter durations or migrate for (in)definite periods to Japan in more detail: education and professional sport. Although the paper focuses on Fiji and Japan, the discussion points at two structural undercurrents that characterize Pacific Islander mobility more generally and aims to appeal to a broader audience interested in Pacific Studies. Keywords: Fiji, Japan, Pacific Rim, mobility, migration [Submitted as Scientific Paper: 05 May 2021, acceptance of the revised manuscript: 21 August 2021] Source: Dominik Schieder.Source: Dominik Figure 1: Reception for the Kanagawa-based honorary consul of the Republic of Fiji to Japan in Yokohama, 2012. Pacific Geographies #56 • July/August 2021 13 Source: Dominik Schieder.Source: Dominik Figure 2: Japan-based Fiji Islanders gather for the 2012 Tokyo Sevens international rugby tournament. Introduction While Fiji Islander mobility is global the aforementioned English-speaking Trans-border mobility is constitutive in its reach, as the presence of migrants countries in the Pacific Rim or within to the lives of many contemporary from Fiji in countries as diverse as the Pacific Islands, little is known Pacific Islanders (e.g. Keck & Schieder France, India, Japan, the United States about Fiji Islanders and, by extension, 2015; Lee & Francis 2009; Rensel & of America and the United Kingdom other Pacific Islander migrant popula- Howard 2012; Taylor & Lee 2017) and testifies, a recent study conducted by tions in those parts of Asia that are Fiji is no exception. Once a British the International Organization for crown colony between 1874 and 1970, Migration (IOM) shows that by mid- Fiji has witnessed the influx of large 2019, the absolute majority of the numbers of South Asian indentured estimated total of 222.000 Fiji-born labourers and passenger migrants dur- people living abroad were located in ing its early colonial history as well as four Pacific Rim countries: Australia, other immigrants mainly from East Canada, New Zealand and the US Asia and Oceania. Since the 1970s, (IOM 2020:xvi; cf. Voigt-Graf 2007). however, Fiji has turned from an immi- The same study claims that emigration gration to an emigration country (Lal from Fiji has doubled since 1990 and 2003). Large numbers of Indo-Fijians that in 2019 Fiji had one of the highest (the descendants of South Asian immi- mobility rates of Pacific Island coun- grants) and other Fiji Islanders have tries with an estimated emigrant popu- left Fiji following the ethnonationalist lation of 25 per cent in comparison to political developments which unfolded its resident population (IOM 2020:24).1 after Fiji gained independence and led Despite these numbers, it is interesting to several political coups and constitu- to note that in the field of migration tional crises since the mid-1980s (Lal studies, Fiji has attracted far less atten- 2006; Fraenkel et al. 2009). At the same tion to date compared to other coun- time, Fiji Islanders have been involved tries in Oceania that are characterized in different types of educational and by large-scale mobility such as Samoa labour mobility, occasionally leading and Tonga. Moreover, while a handful Schieder.Source: Dominik to permanent emigration (IOM 2020; of scholars have explored migration Figure 3: An advertisement for an Osaka-based Mohanty 2006). patterns and routes between Fiji and food bar owned by a migrant from Fiji, 2012. 14 Pacific Geographies #56 • July/August 2021 Source: Dominik Schieder.Source: Dominik Figure 4: A meeting of the Fiji Community in Tokyo, 2013. located in or bordering the Pacific (but indigenous Fijians (henceforth: Fiji- from the British Empire in 1970, that see Besnier 2012; ‘Esau 2007).2 ans) and Indo-Fijians. In 2007, they bilateral relations were established and This article aims to contribute to made up 94.3 per cent of the total cross-border mobility put into motion. Pacific Islander mobility studies. It population (56.8 per cent Fijians and Japan was one of the first countries to mainly builds on fieldwork, which I 37.5 per cent Indo-Fijians) with the endorse Fiji as an independent state in conducted on Fiji Islander life worlds remaining being mainly of Chinese, 1970 and has been placing a particular and community patterns in Japan in European, Rotuman, other Pacific focus on health, environmental issues, 2012-13 (Schieder 2015) but also takes Islander and mixed-ethnic origin (Fiji climate change and education as part into consideration more recent devel- Islands Bureau of Statistics 2008).4 of its official development assistance opments.3 The article follows two par- While to this day, the majority of Fiji’s (ODA) to Fiji (as well as other Pacific ticular aims. Firstly, it provides general emigrants remain Indo-Fijians, the Island countries) (MOFA 2016). information on trans-border mobility number of Fijians leaving the coun- Existing interconnections are also between Fiji and Japan, also contex- try for longer periods or indefinitely increasingly shaped by a growing Jap- tually referring to other nodes of the is growing (Voigt-Graf 2008). In this anese interest in regional geopolitics Fiji diaspora. Secondly, it engages in article, I employ the term ‘Fiji Island- triggered by China’s rising influence more detail with two of the main rea- ers’ to refer to persons from Fiji (i.e. in Oceania (Envall 2020; Tarte 2005, sons why Fiji Islanders move for short born in Fiji, raised in Fiji, self-identify- 2018). Japan has been a trading partner periods, temporarily migrate or even ing as from Fiji etc.) regardless of their for Fiji (and other Pacific Island states) settle down in Japan: education and ethnic backgrounds but will specify if for decades. Although its economic professional sport (here: rugby). While I am referring to certain Fiji Islanders interests in island Oceania is marginal these facets of Fiji Islander mobility in the discussion. For example, while on a global scale, they play some role will be discussed in separate sections, Fiji Islanders are engaged in educa- in these small countries’ economies. they occasionally overlap to various, at tional mobility, the absolute majority Japan has been importing food (espe- times considerable degrees in individ- of rugby players from Fiji in Japan are cially fish, crustaceans and molluscs), ual cases and should be understood as indigenous Fijians as well as manufactured goods (espe- heuristics lenses rather than categories cially wood and cork products) from that can be neatly separated. Fiji Islanders in Japan Fiji whereas Japanese exports to Fiji Before I proceed, a note on termi- Given that Fiji and Japan have not are mainly made up by machinery and nology is warranted: Fiji is a multi-eth- shared colonial connections, it was transport equipment as well as min- nic society and mainly constituted by only after Fiji gained independence eral fuels (Pacific Islands Centre 2020). Pacific Geographies #56 • July/August 2021 15 In addition, tourist mobility between at the time of my research in 2012- Islanders in Japan in that year held Japan and Fiji has been an important 13 and mainly concerned Fijian and ‘student’, ‘trainee’ or ‘instructor’ visas link between the two countries prior Indo-Fijian men married to Japanese with students (60) making up by far to the current global COVID-19 pan- or other Asian women. Concurrently, the largest group (Immigration Ser- demic in terms of its benefits to Fiji’s chain migration played only a very vices Agency of Japan 2021a). In addi- local tourism industry (ibid.). marginal role at that time. Most of tion, and based on previous research The first nine Fiji Islanders in Japan the Fiji Islanders I have worked with experiences, it is fair to assume that a were statistically recorded for 1974. hailed from urban areas or had lived significant number amongst those 40 They arrived in the country as part in towns for longer periods of their Fiji Islanders holding an ‘engineer/ of diplomatic missions and for edu- lives before leaving Fiji. Almost all of specialist in humanities/international cational purposes; the later have been them had transnational connections services’ visa have also been engaged playing a prominent role in fostering to relatives in Australia, the U.S. and in educational work. mobility between Fiji and Japan ever other countries and a few arrived in As part of its ODA initiatives, since.5 Data offered by the Japanese Japan via the diaspora. While no offi- Japan not only sends material aid, aid government shows that numbers cial statistical data on the ethnic com- workers and volunteers to the Pacific increased only slowly in the consec- position of the migrant group exists, Islands. From the outset of bilateral utive decades but more rapidly in a survey I conducted during my field- relations between the two countries recent years. Yet, they remain low in work revealed that it broadly resem- Japan has also been regularly inviting comparison to other Pacific destina- bled Fiji’s population structure at that Fiji Islanders to obtain degrees and tions such as Australia and New Zea- time (cf. Schieder 2015:174-177). training at Japanese universities in land, never comprising more than a Comparing the 2019 figures with areas such as agriculture, environmen- few hundred individuals. This is due statistical data concerning the period tal conservation, management, peda- to the specific reasons that allow for- during which I conducted fieldwork in gogy and science education.

Load more