Poronia Erici — Dung Buttons

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Fungus Factsheet 21 / 2008 Science Division Poronia erici — dung buttons Richard Robinson, Science Division, Manjimup, [email protected] © Richard Robinson Poronia erici is a common fungus found throughout southern Australia. In Western Australia it can be found in all habitats that support the western grey kangaroo. Its common name is dung buttons, and it fruits only on the scats of herbivorous mammals. The fruit bodies have a tough texture and are generally 2–5 mm in diameter, but they can be as large as 10mm. They have a dark brown bowl- or cup-shaped base and a flat, beige top that is punctured by tiny irregular sized pores. Spores are produced in small flask- shaped receptacles embedded in the fruit and are released through the pores, which form the opening of the receptacle. This type of fruit body is called a stroma (strom-: bed or mattress). Dung buttons can be very common, especially on open recently burnt sites with lush new plant growth that attracts a lot of kangaroos. Sometimes up to 25 buttons can be found on a single scat. In the southwest and other regions of southern Australia, dung buttons can also be found fruiting on wallaby, kangaroo, wombat, rabbit, sheep, goats and sometimes cow and horse dung. The scientific name describes the appearance of the fungus and its common habitat. Por-: pores, -onia: pertaining to or related to, eric-: heath (likely referring to open heathlands where it is commonly found). Produced and published by the Science Division, Department of Environment and Conservation, Western Australia, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, WA 6983 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Post-Release Monitoring of Western Grey Kangaroos (Macropus Fuliginosus) Relocated from an Urban Development Site
animals Article Post-Release Monitoring of Western Grey Kangaroos (Macropus fuliginosus) Relocated from an Urban Development Site Mark Cowan 1,* , Mark Blythman 1, John Angus 1 and Lesley Gibson 2 1 Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Wildlife Research Centre, Woodvale, WA 6026, Australia; [email protected] (M.B.); [email protected] (J.A.) 2 Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, WA 6151, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-8-9405-5141 Received: 31 August 2020; Accepted: 5 October 2020; Published: 19 October 2020 Simple Summary: As a result of urban development, 122 western grey kangaroos (Macropus fuliginosus) were relocated from the outskirts of Perth, Western Australia, to a nearby forest. Tracking collars were fitted to 67 of the kangaroos to monitor survival rates and movement patterns over 12 months. Spotlighting and camera traps were used as a secondary monitoring technique particularly for those kangaroos without collars. The survival rate of kangaroos was poor, with an estimated 80% dying within the first month following relocation and only six collared kangaroos surviving for up to 12 months. This result implicates stress associated with the capture, handling, and transport of animals as the likely cause. The unexpected rapid rate of mortality emphasises the importance of minimising stress when undertaking animal relocations. Abstract: The expansion of urban areas and associated clearing of habitat can have severe consequences for native wildlife. One option for managing wildlife in these situations is to relocate them.
[Show full text]
The Kangaroo Island Tammar Wallaby
The Kangaroo Island Tammar Wallaby Assessing ecologically sustainable commercial harvesting A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation by Margaret Wright and Phillip Stott University of Adelaide March 1999 RIRDC Publication No 98/114 RIRDC Project No. UA-40A © 1999 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 0 642 57879 6 ISSN 1440-6845 "The Kangaroo Island Tammar Wallaby - Assessing ecologically sustainable commercial harvesting " Publication No: 98/114 Project No: UA-40A The views expressed and the conclusions reached in this publication are those of the author and not necessarily those of persons consulted. RIRDC shall not be responsible in any way whatsoever to any person who relies in whole or in part on the contents of this report. This publication is copyright. However, RIRDC encourages wide dissemination of its research, providing the Corporation is clearly acknowledged. For any other enquiries concerning reproduction, contact the Publications Manager on phone 02 6272 3186. Researcher Contact Details Margaret Wright & Philip Stott Department of Environmental Science and Management University of Adelaide ROSEWORTHY SA 5371 Phone: 08 8303 7838 Fax: 08 8303 7956 Email: [email protected] [email protected] Website: http://www.roseworthy.adelaide.edu.au/ESM/ RIRDC Contact Details Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Level 1, AMA House 42 Macquarie Street BARTON ACT 2600 PO Box 4776 KINGSTON ACT 2604 Phone: 02 6272 4539 Fax: 02 6272 5877 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.rirdc.gov.au Published in March 1999 Printed on environmentally friendly paper by Canprint ii Foreword The Tammar Wallaby on Kangaroo Island, South Australia, is currently managed as a vertebrate pest.
[Show full text]
Eastern Grey Kangaroo Macropus Giganteus Shaw 1790 As a Vulnerable Species in Part 1 of Schedule 2 of the Act
NSW SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Preliminary Determination The Scientific Committee, established by the Threatened Species Conservation Act, has made a Preliminary Determination NOT to support a proposal to list the Eastern Grey Kangaroo Macropus giganteus Shaw 1790 as a Vulnerable species in Part 1 of Schedule 2 of the Act. Rejection of nominations is provided for by Part 2 of the Act. The Scientific Committee has found that: 1. Macropus giganteus Shaw 1790 (family Macropodidae), known as the Eastern Grey Kangaroo, is a large, highly sexually dimorphic macropod. Head-body to 2302 mm (males), 1857 mm (females); tail to 1090 mm (males), 842 mm (females); weight to 85 kg (males), 42 kg (females). Grey-brown dorsally, paler ventrally and on legs. Ears long, dark brown outside, pale grey inside with whitish fringe. Distal third of tail blackish. Muzzle finely haired (Menkhorst and Knight 2001; Johnson 2006; Coulson 2008). 2. Macropus giganteus is endemic to Australia. It is widely distributed in eastern Australia from Cape York Peninsula, Queensland, to far southeast South Australia and northeastern Tasmania. It is found throughout New South Wales (NSW). In western NSW, northwestern Victoria and southwestern Queensland M. giganteus is sympatric with its sister species the Western Grey Kangaroo (Macropus fuliginosus) (Johnson 2006; Coulson 2008). Eastern and Western Grey Kangaroos were recognised as separate species only in the 1970s (Kirsch and Poole 1972). Macropus giganteus mostly occurs where annual rainfall is >250 mm (Caughley et al. 1987b) in sclerophyll forest, woodland (including mallee), shrubland and heathland. It can also occur in modified habitats including farmland with remnant native vegetation, pine plantations and golf courses (Menkhorst and Knight 2001; Johnson 2006; Coulson 2008; Dawson 2012).
[Show full text]
Mammals of the Avon Region
Mammals of the Avon Region By Mandy Bamford, Rowan Inglis and Katie Watson Foreword by Dr. Tony Friend R N V E M E O N G T E O H F T W A E I S L T A E R R N A U S T 1 2 Contents Foreword 6 Introduction 8 Fauna conservation rankings 25 Species name Common name Family Status Page Tachyglossus aculeatus Short-beaked echidna Tachyglossidae not listed 28 Dasyurus geoffroii Chuditch Dasyuridae vulnerable 30 Phascogale calura Red-tailed phascogale Dasyuridae endangered 32 phascogale tapoatafa Brush-tailed phascogale Dasyuridae vulnerable 34 Ningaui yvonnae Southern ningaui Dasyuridae not listed 36 Antechinomys laniger Kultarr Dasyuridae not listed 38 Sminthopsis crassicaudata Fat-tailed dunnart Dasyuridae not listed 40 Sminthopsis dolichura Little long-tailed dunnart Dasyuridae not listed 42 Sminthopsis gilberti Gilbert’s dunnart Dasyuridae not listed 44 Sminthopsis granulipes White-tailed dunnart Dasyuridae not listed 46 Myrmecobius fasciatus Numbat Myrmecobiidae vulnerable 48 Chaeropus ecaudatus Pig-footed bandicoot Peramelinae presumed extinct 50 Isoodon obesulus Quenda Peramelinae priority 5 52 Species name Common name Family Status Page Perameles bougainville Western-barred bandicoot Peramelinae endangered 54 Macrotis lagotis Bilby Peramelinae vulnerable 56 Cercartetus concinnus Western pygmy possum Burramyidae not listed 58 Tarsipes rostratus Honey possum Tarsipedoidea not listed 60 Trichosurus vulpecula Common brushtail possum Phalangeridae not listed 62 Bettongia lesueur Burrowing bettong Potoroidae vulnerable 64 Potorous platyops Broad-faced
[Show full text]
Blastocystis in Australian Wildlife Jul 2011
Blastocystis in Australian wildlife Fact sheet Introductory statement Blastocystis is a protozoan parasite which infects a wide variety of hosts including humans and other mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians (Tan 2004). This parasite is known to cause intestinal disease in humans and non human primates. Recent research has identified Blastocystis in some species of Australian wildlife but pathogenicity remains undetermined. Aetiology Blastocystosis is caused by the protozoan Blastocystis sp. Infection may result in gastrointestinal disease in the host. The taxonomy of Blastocystis has often changed due to the unique morphology and cellular components. Molecular characterisation has suggested this protist belongs in the group (Stramenopiles), genus Blastocystis. Natural hosts Blastocystis sp. are known to infect a wide variety of vertebrate hosts including humans, non-human primates, companion animals, livestock, birds, amphibians and reptiles. World distribution Occurs throughout the world. Occurrences in Australia There are few reports of Blastocystis sp. within Australian wildlife most likely due to the difficultly in identifying infection through direct microscopy as cysts can be confused with yeast and faecal debris. However, a recent study using molecular techniques has identified this parasite in the chuditch (Dasyurus geoffroii), brushtail possum (Trichuris vulpecular), quenda (Isoodon obesulus) and woylie (Bettongia penicillata) (Parkar et al. 2007). It has also been observed in captive populations of the western grey kangaroo (Macropus fuliginosus), quokka (Setonix brachyurous) and southern hairy nosed wombat (Lasiorhinus latifrons) (Parkar et al. 2010). Epidemiology Blastocystis is predominantly transmitted directly through the faecal-oral route however the water resistant cysts can also be transmitted indirectly through contaminated water sources (Tan 2004).
[Show full text]
On the Evolution of Kangaroos and Their Kin (Family Macropodidae) Using Retrotransposons, Nuclear Genes and Whole Mitochondrial Genomes
ON THE EVOLUTION OF KANGAROOS AND THEIR KIN (FAMILY MACROPODIDAE) USING RETROTRANSPOSONS, NUCLEAR GENES AND WHOLE MITOCHONDRIAL GENOMES William George Dodt B.Sc. (Biochemistry), B.Sc. Hons (Molecular Biology) Principal Supervisor: Dr Matthew J Phillips (EEBS, QUT) Associate Supervisor: Dr Peter Prentis (EEBS, QUT) External Supervisor: Dr Maria Nilsson-Janke (Senckenberg Biodiversity and Research Centre, Frankfurt am Main) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Science and Engineering Faculty Queensland University of Technology 2018 1 Keywords Adaptive radiation, ancestral state reconstruction, Australasia, Bayesian inference, endogenous retrovirus, evolution, hybridization, incomplete lineage sorting, incongruence, introgression, kangaroo, Macropodidae, Macropus, mammal, marsupial, maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony, molecular dating, phylogenetics, retrotransposon, speciation, systematics, transposable element 2 Abstract The family Macropodidae contains the kangaroos, wallaroos, wallabies and several closely related taxa that occupy a wide variety of habitats in Australia, New Guinea and surrounding islands. This group of marsupials is the most species rich family within the marsupial order Diprotodontia. Despite significant investigation from previous studies, much of the evolutionary history of macropodids (including their origin within Diprotodontia) has remained unclear, in part due to an incomplete early fossil record. I have utilized several forms of molecular sequence data to shed
[Show full text]
Behaviour, Group Dynamics, and Health of Free-Ranging Eastern Grey Kangaroos
Behaviour, group dynamics, and health of free-ranging eastern grey kangaroos (Macropus giganteus) Jai Mikaela Green-Barber Submitted for the completion of a Doctor of Philosophy (Science) degree at Western Sydney University November 2017 Dedication The following thesis is dedicated to my hero. You instilled in me an appreciation of nature and of knowledge, you showed me the joys of solving puzzles and debating ideas, and you always encouraged me to be daring when the reward was worth the risk. Most importantly you always taught me to laugh along the way, to laugh at myself, and not take life too seriously. These gifts you have given me have led me down this path, and gave me the strength to complete the journey. Your influence will continue to shape the rest of my life. This one’s for you Dad xoxo Acknowledgements I would like to thank Associate Professor Julie Old for the encouragement and support needed to complete this thesis. I really appreciate you putting up with my essay length emails full of questions and all the feedback on the countless draft manuscripts and presentations produced throughout my candidature. To Dr Hayley Stannard, thank you for teaching me to collect blood samples and run blood chemistry analysis, and for the helpful feedback on draft manuscripts. Thank you to Dr Oselyne Ong for teaching me how to run antimicrobial assays, Megan Callander for teaching me how to use various microsatellite analysis software, and Professor John Hunt for providing feedback on draft manuscripts and advice on analysis. To all the volunteers that assisted me in the field your help was greatly appreciated.
[Show full text]
A Natural Grey Kangaroo Hybrid?
A natural grey kangaroo hybrid? Graeme Coulson1 and Ruth Coulson2 1 Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010 2 Early Childhood Science, 105 Canning Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053 Email: [email protected] The eastern grey kangaroo, Macropus giganteus, and the western grey Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/australian-zoologist/article-pdf/31/4/599/1475012/az_2001_004.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021 kangaroo, M. fuliginosus, occur over an extensive zone of sympatry, but there has been no record of hybridisation between these sibling species in the field. The two species can be reliably distinguished by their characteristic pelage, which is grey-brown in eastern grey kangaroos and chocolate brown in western grey kangaroos. The pattern of colour on the face is particularly distinctive: the pale grey face of the eastern grey kangaroo contrasts with dark shading around the eyes, whereas the western grey kangaroo has a monochrome dark brown face. We report a sighting of a probable hybrid grey kangaroo in June 2000 at Willandra National Park (33° 13’ S, 145° 07’ E), western New South Wales. This individual was an adult female, which was intermediate in phenotype and was accompanied by a possible back-crossed sub-adult. In view of this and other reports of putative hybrids, we urge greater scrutiny of grey kangaroos in the sympatric zone. ABSTRACT Key words: eastern grey kangaroo, western grey kangaroo, hybrid, Macropus giganteus, Macropus fuliginosus Introduction were able to back-cross with males of the parent species. Kirsch (1984) later reported the reverse The eastern grey kangaroo, Macropus giganteus cross in a captive group, but the fertility of the Shaw 1790, and the western grey kangaroo, M.
[Show full text]
Disclosure Document F0001488301
Numbers of permits granted by the Department for the destruction of wildlife issued for each animal under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 for the period 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017 AND Numbers of animals allowed to be killed AND the reasons for the permits being issued Table 1: Number of permits granted under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 for the destruction of wildlife Financial year Number of permits granted 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017 1008 Table 2: Summary of Permits to Destroy Wildlife by species for the period 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017 Species Permits that include No. of animals this species issued on Permit Adelaide Rosella 45 3241 Australian Hobby 2 # Australian Magpie 6 42 Australian Pelican 2 # Australian Pratincole 2 # Australian Raven 1 # Australian Shelduck 4 32 Australian White Ibis 5 56 Australian Wood Duck (Maned Duck) 30 927 Banded Lapwing 2 # Barn Owl 2 # Black Kite 2 70 Black Swan 4 36 Black-faced Cormorant 1 125 Black-fronted Dotterel 1 # Black-shouldered Kite 2 # Black-tailed Native Hen 2 # Brown Falcon 2 # Brown Goshawk 2 # Brown Songlark 2 # Cape Barren Goose 15 241 Common Brushtail Possum 57 6420 Crested Pigeon 2 # Eastern Grey Kangaroo 28 1610 Emu 118 2810 Euro 100 3262 Fairy Martin 2 # Galah 2 # Gould's Wattled Bat 1 # Grey Teal, (Australasian Teal) 1 # Hardhead (White-eyed Duck) 1 # Little Corella 2 # Little Pied Cormorant 1 # Page 1 of 4 Document released by DEWNR under the Freedom of Information Act 1991 1 of 4 Numbers of permits granted by the Department for the destruction of wildlife issued for each animal under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 for the period 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017 AND Numbers of animals allowed to be killed AND the reasons for the permits being issued Species Permits that include No.
[Show full text]
Control and Conservation of Abundant Kangaroo Species
animals Review The Perils of Being Populous: Control and Conservation of Abundant Kangaroo Species David Benjamin Croft 1,* and Ingrid Witte 2 1 School of Biological Earth & Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia 2 Rooseach@RootourismTM, Adelaide River, NT 0846, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Kangaroos likely prospered for most of the last 65,000 years under the landscape management of Australia’s first people. From the arrival of British colonists in 1788, European agricultural practices, crops and livestock transformed the landscape to one less favourable to indigenous flora and fauna. However, the six species of large kangaroos persisted and came into conflict with cropping and pastoral enterprises, leading to controls on their abundance. After mass killing for bounties, a commercial industry emerged in the 1970s to sell meat and hides into domestic and international markets. The further intention was to constrain kangaroo abundance while sustaining kangaroos in the landscape. Human–human conflict has emerged about the necessity and means of this lethal control. Further control of the abundance of four of the six species is promoted. Their abundance is considered by some as a threat to biodiversity in conservation reserves, removing these as a haven. We therefore propose returning the kangaroos’ stewardship to the current and future generations of Aboriginal Australians. We envisage that a marriage of localised consumptive (bush tucker) and non-consumptive (wildlife tourism) uses in the indigenous-protected-area estate can better sustain abundant kangaroo populations into the future. Citation: Croft, D.B.; Witte, I. The Abstract: Australia’s first people managed landscapes for kangaroo species as important elements Perils of Being Populous: Control and of their diet, accoutrements and ceremony.
[Show full text]
Phylogenetic Analysis of Mitogenomic Data Sets Resolves the Relationship of Seven Macropostrongyloides Species from Australian Macropodid and Vombatid Marsupials
pathogens Article Phylogenetic Analysis of Mitogenomic Data Sets Resolves the Relationship of Seven Macropostrongyloides Species from Australian Macropodid and Vombatid Marsupials Tanapan Sukee * , Anson V. Koehler , Ross Hall, Ian Beveridge, Robin B. Gasser and Abdul Jabbar * Department of Veterinary Biosciences, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3030, Australia; [email protected] (A.V.K.); [email protected] (R.H.); [email protected] (I.B.); [email protected] (R.B.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (T.S.); [email protected] (A.J.); Tel.: +61-9731-2022 (A.J.) Received: 19 November 2020; Accepted: 9 December 2020; Published: 12 December 2020 Abstract: Nematodes of the genus Macropostrongyloides inhabit the large intestines or stomachs of macropodid (kangaroos and wallabies) and vombatid (wombats) marsupials. This study established the relationships of seven species of Macropostrongyloides using mitochondrial (mt) protein amino acid sequence data sets. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that species of Macropostrongyloides (M. lasiorhini, M. baylisi, M. yamagutii, M. spearei, M. mawsonae and M. woodi) from the large intestines of their hosts formed a monophyletic assemblage with strong nodal support to the exclusion of M. dissimilis from the stomach of the swamp wallaby. Furthermore, the mitochondrial protein-coding genes provided greater insights into the diversity and phylogeny of the genus Macropostrongyloides; such data sets could potentially be used to elucidate the relationships among other parasitic nematodes of Australian marsupials. Keywords: Macropostrongyloides; kangaroos; wallabies; wombats; mitochondrial DNA; phylogenetics; next-generation sequencing 1. Introduction The genus Macropostrongyloides is the largest group of nematodes of the subfamily Phascolostrongylinae, occurring predominantly within the large intestines of macropodid (kangaroos and wallabies) and vombatid (wombats) marsupials [1].
[Show full text]
Kangaroo Island Kangaroo (Macropus Fuliginosus Ssp
Kangaroo Island kangaroo (Macropus fuliginosus ssp. fugilinosus) scrub. From late afternoon to early morning the kangaroos move out to graze in open grassy areas, sometimes congregating in small groups. If startled, the kangaroos bound along on their hind legs at high speed, but they more commonly use a slow gait, using their tails as well as all four feet. Kangaroos are grazing animals The Kangaroo Island kangaroo has a preference for grasses and herbs, and also browses on the leaves of bushes. Processed human food severely disrupts the nutritional balance of their natural diet. Sugars in our foods can cause an increase in an undesirable fungus in kangaroos’ Macros = large; pus = foot; fuliginosus = sooty stomachs, leading to diarrhoea and other digestive related problems. Food such as beans, peas and potato peel This is the only species of kangaroo contain alkaloids that kill the natural bacteria living in their found on Kangaroo Island. stomachs. Human foods can also cause dental decay and mouth infections. Feeding also affects the social behaviour On an autumn day in 1802, English navigator Matthew of kangaroos, as large numbers of the animals are attracted Flinders wrote: to the ‘free’ foods. These problems can lead ultimately to ‘… a delightful regale they afforded, after four months malnutrition, poor health and even death. privation from almost any fresh provisions … in gratitude for so seasonable a supply, I named this southern land Kanguroo (sic) Island.’ In 1803 Francois Peron, the naturalist aboard the French ship Le Geographe, took specimens of this kangaroo, collected near Penneshaw, to Paris. In 1897 these specimens were described and named Macropus fuliginosus.
[Show full text]