<<

1

AGENDA AND NOTES OF THE MEETING OF THE RTA DATED 30/11/2017.

Item No - 01 G1/109928/2017/K

Agenda-To consider the application for the grant of fresh regular permit to SC KL 34 C 1427 / another suitable vehicle to operate on the route KUZHIMAVU – Via, , Panackachira, , , Kannimala, Pulikkunnu, Kottaramkada as Ordinary Service

Applicant- Sri. Binu P S, Pazhoor [H], Palampra P.O., .

Proposed Timings Kuzhimavu Mundakayam Erumely A D A D A D 6.05[S] 6.43 7.00 7.33 8.16 7.43 9.20 8.42 9.30 10.08 11.03 10.25 11.20 11.58 12.40 1.13 2.36 2.03 3.09 3.42 4.53 4.20 5.35 6.08 6.58 6.25 7.55 [H] 7.17

Notes- This is an application for the grant of a of a fresh regular permit to SC KL 34 C 1427 / another suitable vehicle to operate on the route KUZHIMAVU – ERUMELY Via, Koruthodu, Panackachira, Vandanpathal, Mundakayam, Kannimala, Pulikkunnu, Kottaramkada as Ordinary Service.

The enquiry report of MVI Kanjirappally revealed the following.

1. Total distance of the route : 28.2 Kms.

2. Intra/ Inter District route : Intra District.

3. Details of Virgin Portion : Nil

2

4. Details of Road Fitness certificate : N.A.

5. Details of Overlapping : Total overlapping is 150 meter ie, 0.53 % of the total route length [28.2 km] which is within the permissible limit.

1) Route portion of 150 meter from Mundakayam B S Jn. to Mundakayam Cosway Jn. objectionably overlaps on – Thekkady, Trivandrum- Thekkady notified Scheme 26929/TB/66/PW dtd 12/10/2016.

6. Details of Vehicle produced : KL 34 C 1427 / another suitable vehicle owned by the applicant. 7. Details of Concurrence :N A.

8. Necessity, recommendation if any : Nil.

9. Court Direction, if any : Nil.

10. Other relevant points : It is reported that the proposed fresh permit route is beneficial for the travelling of students and public. 11. Type of road : Mentioned in the report submitted by the field Officer.

RTA may hear the applicant, peruse the records and take a decision.

3

Item No - 02 G1/105888/2017/K

Agenda-To consider the application for the grant of fresh regular permit to SC KL 34 A 8688 / another suitable vehicle to operate on the route KMBUKUTHY – KOTTARAMKADA Via, Madukka, Panackachira, Varickani Jn., Mundakayam, Vandanpathal, and Paschima with cut trip from, Mundakayam to Kuzhimavu via, Panackachira, Madukka, and Koruthodu as Ordinary Service

Applicant- Sri. Kunjumon, Puthuparambil, Pambanar P.O., Kallar, Peerumed.

Proposed Timings Kombukuthy Mundakayam Paschima Kottaramkada Kuzhimavu A D A D A P D A D A D 7.10[S] 7.45 7.47 8.02 8.15 8.46 8.31 8.18 9.22 8.47 9.25 10.00 10.37 10.03 10.50 11.25 12.55 12.20 1.15 1.50 2.35 3.13 4.03 3.25 4.13 4.28 4.41 5.11 4.43 5.53 5.18 6.05 6.40 7.35 [H] 7.00

Notes- This is an application for the grant of a of a fresh regular permit to SC KL 34 A 8688 / another suitable vehicle to operate on the route Kombukuthy – Kottaramkada Via, Madukka, Panackachira, Varickani Jn., Mundakayam, Vandanpathal, and Paschima with cut trip from, Mundakayam to Kuzhimavu via, Panackachira, Madukka, and Koruthodu as Ordinary Service

The enquiry report of MVI Kanjirappally revealed the following.

1. Total distance of the route : 28.8 Kms.

2. Intra/ Inter District route : Intra District.

3. Details of Virgin Portion : Nil 4

4. Details of Road Fitness certificate : N.A.

5. Details of Overlapping : Total overlapping is 0.1 KM. ie, 0.34 % of the total route length [28.8 km] which is within the permissible limit.

1) Route portion of 0.1 km from Mundakayam B S Jn. to Mundakayam Cosway Jn. objectionably overlaps on Ernakulam – Thekkady, Trivandrum- Thekkady notified Scheme 26929/TB/66/PW dtd 12/10/2016.

6. Details of Vehicle produced : KL 34 A 8688 / another suitable vehicle not owned by the applicant. 7. Details of Concurrence :N A.

8. Necessity, recommendation if any : Nil.

9. Court Direction, if any : Nil.

10. Other relevant points : It is reported that the proposed fresh permit route is beneficial for the travelling of students and public. 11. Type of road : Mentioned in the report submitted by the field Officer.

RTA may hear the applicant, peruse the records and take a decision.

5

Item No - 03 G1/102206/2017/K

Agenda-To consider the application for the grant of fresh regular permit to SC KL 33 3199 / another suitable vehicle to operate on the route MANARACADU – Via, Manarcadu Palli, , , Madappadu, Parakandam, , Thavalakuzhy, Vallikkadu, Clamattom, , Padinjare , , Madayakunnu, Nechimattom, Kuravilangadu, Muttunkal Jn., Mukkavalakunnu, Manikavu, Vakkad, Cherumthadam, Madukka, Marangoli, Elanji, Chelakkal, VISAT, Edayar and Kizhakombu as Ordinary Service.

Applicant- Smt. Sindhu A P, Siva Sadanam, Vayala P O, Kottayam.

Proposed Timings Koothattu Elanji Kuravilan Vayala Ettumanoor Ayarkunnam Manarcadu Kulam Gadu A D P A P D A D A P D A D A D 6.30 [S] 6.55 7.17 7.20 7.37 8.09 7.52 8.42 8.20 10.30 10.02 9.25 8.45 10.45 11.13 11.50 12.40 2.40 2.00 3.00 3.40 6.10 5.42 5.05 4.25 6.25 6.55 7.32 8.16 [H]

Notes- This is an application for the grant of a of a fresh regular permit to SC KL 33 3199 / another suitable vehicle to operate on the route MANARACADU – KOOTHATTUKULAM Via, Manarcadu Palli, Ayarkunnam, Arumanoor, Madappadu, Parakandam, Ettumanoor, Thavalakuzhy, Vallikkadu, Clamattom, Kadappoor, Padinjare Koodalloor, Vayala, Madayakunnu, Nechimattom, Kuravilangadu, Muttunkal Jn., Mukkavalakunnu, Manikavu, Vakkad, Cherumthadam, Madukka, Marangoli, Elanji, Chelakkal, VISAT, Edayar and Kizhakombu as Ordinary Service.

The enquiry report of MVI revealed the following.

1. Total distance of the route : 56.8 Kms.

2. Intra/ Inter District route : Inter District [RTAKTM-40km, 16.8km] 3. Details of Virgin Portion : Nil

6

4. Details of Road Fitness certificate : N.A.

5. Details of Overlapping : Total overlapping- 2.8 KM. ie, 4.92 % of the total route length [56.8 km] which is within the permissible limit. 1) Route portion of 2 KM from Ettumanoor B S to Thavalakuzhy and Central Jn. to Parakandam objectionably overlaps on Kottayam – Kozhikkode No GO[MS] 209/67/PW dtd 07/10/1967 and Kottayam - Scheme GO[MS] 139/67/PW dtd 18/07/1967. 2) Route portion of 800 meters from Kuravilangadu Pallithazham to Muttunkal Jn. objectionably overlaps on Kottayam – Kozhikkode No GO[MS] 209/67/PW dtd 07/10/1967.

6. Details of Vehicle produced : KL 33 3199 / another suitable vehicle owned by the applicant. 7. Details of Concurrence :N A.

8. Necessity, recommendation if any : Nil.

9. Court Direction, if any : Nil.

10. Other relevant points : It is reported that the portion from Kuravilangadu to Elanji and Elanji to Koothattukulam via proposed route is remote area and ill served. Stage carriage service to these remote village area will be helpful to develop their traditional trades of the village people and facilitate their daily travel to livelihood, education etc. It will be beneficial to the people who all depending the Hospital at Vakkadu. This service will be banaficial to the students and staff of VISAT College. Even though the Mnaracadu – Ettumanoor – Vayala – Kluravilangadu sector is average served, the proposed route will decrease the efforts of the ordinary citizens physically and economically. Definitely this service willincrease the travel facilities of Common man and beneficial to the public. 11. Type of road : Mentioned in the report submitted by the field Officer.

RTA may hear the applicant, peruse the records and take a decision.

7

Item No - 04 G1/117264/2017/K

Agenda-To consider the application for the grant of fresh regular permit to SC KL 35 F 6766 / another suitable vehicle to operate on the route RAMAPURAM – KANJIRAPPALLY Via, Kondadu, Uzhavoor, Chethimattam, , Pala, , , and as Ordinary Service.

Applicant- Sri. K S Shereef, Kunnakkattu [H], Erattupetta.

Proposed Timings Ramapuram Pala Erattupetta Kanjirappally A A P A P D A D D D 4.20 [S] 5.18 5.53 6.33 8.06 7.33 6.53 8.39 9.20 8.06 8.40 10.09 9.29 11.13 10.33 12.41 12.01 1.18 12.45 1.23 1.56 2.28 3.08 4.35 3.58 3.18 5.19 5.22 6.02 4.46 6.46 6.06 8.17 [H] 7.20 6.47

Notes- This is an application for the grant of a of a fresh regular permit to SC KL 35 F 6766 / another suitable vehicle to operate on the route RAMAPURAM – KANJIRAPPALLY Via, Kondadu, Uzhavoor, Chethimattam, Valavoor, Pala, Bharananganam, Erattupetta, and Pinnakkanadu as Ordinary Service.

The enquiry report of MVI Pala revealed the following.

1. Total distance of the route : 53 Kms.

8

2. Intra/ Inter District route : Intra District.

3. Details of Virgin Portion : Nil

4. Details of Road Fitness certificate : N.A.

5. Details of Overlapping : Total overlapping- 2.2 KM. ie, 4.15 % of the total route length [53 km] which is within the permissible limit. 1) Route portion of 1.9 KM from Pala Kottaramattom B S to Kochidappadi objectionably overlaps on Kottayam – Kattappana Scheme GO[P] 42/2009 trans dtd 14/07/2009. 2) Route portion of 300 meters from Kanjirappally Petta Jn. to Kanjirappally B.S. objectionably overlaps on Trivandrum – Thekkady, Ernakulam – Thekkady & Kottayam – Thekkady Scheme GO[P] 42/2009 trans dtd 14/07/2009.

6. Details of Vehicle produced : KL 35 F 6766 / another suitable vehicle owned by the applicant. 7. Details of Concurrence :N A.

8. Necessity, recommendation if any : Nil.

9. Court Direction, if any : Nil.

10. Other relevant points : It is reported that the proposed fresh permit route is beneficial for the travelling of students and public. 11. Type of road : Mentioned in the report submitted by the field Officer.

RTA may hear the applicant, peruse the records and take a decision.

9

Item No - 05 G1/126531/2017/K

Agenda-To consider the application for the grant of fresh regular permit to SC KL 38 B 9705 / another suitable vehicle to operate on the route KOMBUKUTHY – 116 Colony – PAMPAVALLEY - KANJIRAPPALLY Via, Mundakayam, Madukka, Koruthodu, Paschima Mundakayam, Paingana, Vellanadi, Kooramthookku, , Amaljyothi College Jn., Panachepally, Mannarakkayam, & Kanjirappally Kurisu Kavala as Ordinary Service.

Applicant- Sri. Kunjumon, Puthuparambil [H], Puthuvelil, Pampbanar.

Proposed Timings Kombukuthy MDKM KPLY Kuzhimavu Pampavally Kottaram 116 Via, Kada Colony A D A D A D A P D A D A P D A D 6.30am 7.05 7.30 8.23 Madukka 9.31 8.38 9.45 10.23 Koruthod 11.18 10.40 11.35 12.03 Pachima 12.33 12.04 12.35 1.14 1.32 Koruthod 2.28 1.50 1.34 3.00 3.28 3.33 Pachima 4.08 3.40 3.35 4.09 4.47 Koruthod 5.47 5.09 6.44 [H] 6.09 Madukka

Notes- This is an application for the grant of a of a fresh regular permit to SC KL 38 B 9705 / another suitable vehicle to operate on the route KOMBUKUTHY – 116 Colony - PAMPAVALLEY - KANJIRAPPALLY Via, Mundakayam, Madukka, Koruthodu, Paschima, Mundakayam, Paingana, Vellanadi, Kooramthookku, Koovappally, Amaljyothi College Jn., Panachepally, Mannarakkayam, & Kanjirappally Kurisu Kavala as Ordinary Service.

The enquiry report of MVI Kanjirappally revealed the following.

1. Total distance of the route : 59.5 Kms.

2. Intra/ Inter District route : Intra District.

3. Details of Virgin Portion : Nil 10

4. Details of Road Fitness certificate : N.A.

5. Details of Overlapping : Total overlapping- 2.9 KM. ie, 4.87 % of the total route length [59.5 km] which is within the permissible limit. 1) Route portion of 1.3 KM from Paingana to Mundakayam Cosway Jn. objectionably overlaps on Ernakulam – Thekkady, Trivandrum- Thekkady notified Scheme GO[P] 42/2009 trans dtd 14/07/2009. 2) Route portion of 700 meters from Kanjirappally Kurisu Jn. to Kanjirappally B.S. objectionably overlaps on Trivandrum – Thekkady, Ernakulam – Thekkady & Kottayam – Thekkady Scheme GO[P] 42/2009 trans dtd 14/07/2009. 3) Route portion of 900 meters from Koovappally to Malabar Kavala objectionably overlaps on Changanacherry – Changanacherry Circular scheme GO[P] 42/2009 trans dtd 14/07/2009.

6. Details of Vehicle produced : KL 38 B 9705 / another suitable vehicle owned by the applicant. 7. Details of Concurrence :N A.

8. Necessity, recommendation if any : Nil.

9. Court Direction, if any : Nil.

10. Other relevant points : It is reported that the proposed fresh permit route is beneficial for the travelling of students and public. 11. Type of road : Mentioned in the report submitted by the field Officer.

RTA may hear the applicant, peruse the records and take a decision.

11

Item No - 06 G1/126177/2017/K

Agenda-To consider the application for the grant of fresh regular permit to SC KL 34 E 4190 / another suitable vehicle to operate on the route – KUZHIMAVU Via, , Mundakayam, Varikkani, Vandanpathal, Koruthodu, Kottaramkada, Punchavayal, and 504 Colony as Ordinary Service.

Applicant- Smt. Vidhya D, Kadampanattumadam [H], , Kanjirappally.

Proposed Timings Elamkadu Mundakayam 504 Colony Kottaramkada Kuzhimavu A D A P D A P D A P D A D 6.05am 6.40 7.18 7.55 7.27 [Via 116 Colony] 7.18 8.30 9.08 9.51 9.23 [Via 504Colony] 9.08 10.55 11.25 12.00 11.30 12.15 12.53 1.46 1.08 1.48 2.26 4.00 3.13 3.25 2.35 3.40 5.05 5.30 5.58 7.32 [H] 6.33 6.57 6.05

Notes- This is an application for the grant of a of a fresh regular permit to SC KL 34 E 4190 / another suitable vehicle to operate on the route ELAMKADU – KUZHIMAVU Via, Koottickal, Mundakayam, Varikkani, Vandanpathal, Koruthodu, Kottaramkada, Punchavayal, and 504 Colony as Ordinary Service.

The enquiry report of MVI Kanjirappally revealed the following.

1. Total distance of the route : 55.7 Kms.

2. Intra/ Inter District route : Intra District.

3. Details of Virgin Portion : Nil

4. Details of Road Fitness certificate : N.A.

5. Details of Overlapping : Total overlapping- 0.3 KM. ie, 0.53 % of the total route length [55.7 km] which is within the permissible limit. 12

1) Route portion of 300 Meters from Mundakayam Koottickal Jn. to Mundakayam Cosway Jn. objectionably overlaps on Ernakulam – Thekkady, Trivandrum- Thekkady notified Scheme GO[P] 42/2009 trans dtd 14/07/2009.

6. Details of Vehicle produced : KL 34 E 4190 / another suitable vehicle owned by the applicant. 7. Details of Concurrence :N A.

8. Necessity, recommendation if any : Nil.

9. Court Direction, if any : Nil.

10. Other relevant points : It is reported that the proposed fresh permit route is beneficial for the travelling of students and public. 11. Type of road : Mentioned in the report submitted by the field Officer.

RTA may hear the applicant, peruse the records and take a decision.

13

Item No - 07 G1/127111/2017/K

Agenda-To consider the application for the grant of fresh regular permit to SC KL 33 B 444 / another suitable vehicle to operate on the route ETTUMANOOR – Via, Jn., Kannanchira, Paikad, Poovathummoodu, Thiruvanchoor, Ayarkunnam, MGM Jn., Eruthupuzha, Kooropada, Madappad, Pulikuzhy Colony, Chappath 58 Colony, Vattukulam, , MGM Jn., , Alampally, Kuttickal, Orvayal, Hospital, and Nilampodinji Colony as Ordinary Service.

Applicant- Sri. Sajamon M V, Kunnumpurath [H], Kooropada, Kottayam.

Proposed Timings Ettumanoor Ayarkunnam Kooropada Pampady Nedumkunnam A D A P D A D A P D A D 8.41 7.55 8.02 7.30am 8.50 9.29 9.30 10.20 10.30 11.03 2.09 1.15 1.30 12.35 12.02 2.40 3.19 4.08 4.18 4.51 6.43 5.43 5.53 5.10 6.53 7.43 8.15[H] 7.50

Notes- This is an application for the grant of a of a fresh regular permit to SC KL 33 B 444 / another suitable vehicle to operate on the route ETTUMANOOR – NEDUMKUNNAM Via, Peroor Jn., Kannanchira, Paikad, Poovathummoodu, Thiruvanchoor, Ayarkunnam, Lakkattoor MGM Jn., Eruthupuzha, Kooropada, Madappad, Pulikuzhy Colony, Chappath 58 Colony, Vattukulam, Kothala, MGM Jn., Pampady, Alampally, Kuttickal, Orvayal, Kangazha Hospital, and Nilampodinji Colony with cut trip between Nedumkunnam – Ayarkunnam, Ayarkunnam – Pampady, Pampady – Kooropada and Kooropada – Ettumanoor as Ordinary Service.

The enquiry report of MVI Kottayam revealed the following.

1. Total distance of the route : 47 Kms.

2. Intra/ Inter District route : Intra District.

3. Details of Virgin Portion : Yes. 1.Kooropada Village Jn. to Madappadu 1 km 2.Devagiri Kannachira Jn. – Nedumkunnam 2.5 km

4. Details of Road Fitness certificate : Needed.

14

5. Details of Overlapping : Total overlapping- 1.7 KM. ie, 3.6% of the total route length [47 km] which is within the permissible limit. 1) Route portion of 500 Meters from Ettumanoor Pvt BS to Peroor Jn Objectionably overlaps on Kottayam – Kattappana scheme GO[P] 42/2009 trans dtd 14/07/2009. 2) Route portion of 1 km from Pampady to ALampally Ojectionably overlaps on Ernakulam – Thekkady, Kottayam - Thekkady notified Scheme GO[P] 42/2009 trans dtd 14/07/2009. 3) Route portion of 200 Meters from Kangazha to Kangazha Jn. objectionably Overlaps on Changanacherry – Changanacherry Circular Scheme GO[P] no 42/2009 tran dtd 14/07/2009.

6. Details of Vehicle produced : KL 33 B 444 / another suitable vehicle. Offered vehicle is owned by the applicant.

7. Details of Concurrence :N A.

8. Necessity, recommendation if any : Nil.

9. Court Direction, if any : Nil

10. Other relevant points : It is reported that the proposed fresh permit route is beneficial for the travelling of students and public. 11. Type of road : Mentioned in the report submitted by the field Officer.

RTA may hear the applicant, peruse the records and take a decision.

15

Item No - 08 G1/128655/2017/K

Agenda-To consider the application for the grant of fresh regular permit to SC KL 05 AG 3553 / another suitable vehicle to operate on the route MUNDAKAYAM – ERUMELY via Kuzhimavu, Mookkenpetty, & with cut trips as Mundakayam – Vembly via Koottickal & Yenthayar, Mundakayam – Kuzhimavu via Vandanpathal & Koruthodu, Mundakayam – Erumely via Pulikkunnu, Mundakayam – Kottaramkada via Paschima as ordinary service.

Applicant- Sri. Abin Abraham, Palathinal [H], Chittady P O, Mundakayam.

Proposed Timings MDKM Koottickal Vembly Kuzhimavu Pampa Erumely Kottaram via valley Kada A D P A D A D A P D A P D A P D P 6.17[S] 6.32 6.47 7.05 7.14 7.45 7.30 7.15 8.00 8.38 8.58 9.38 Edaka dathy 10.55 10.35 9.55 11.38 11.00 12.05 12.38 Pulikunnu 1.49 1.16 2.20 2.48 Paschima 2.56 116 CLNY 3.38 3.00 4.20 4.58 5.18 6.23 5.45 5.25 6.30 6.45 7.00 7.49[H] 7.19 7.10

Notes- This is an application for the grant of a of a fresh regular permit to SC KL 05 AG 3553 / another suitable vehicle to operate on the route MUNDAKAYAM – ERUMELY via Kuzhimavu, Mookkenpetty, Edakadathy & Mukkoottuthara with cut trips as Mundakayam – Vembly via Koottickal & Yenthayar, Mundakayam – Kuzhimavu via Vandanpathal & Koruthodu, Mundakayam – Erumely via Pulikkunnu, Mundakayam – Kottaramkada via Paschima as ordinary service. The enquiry report of MVI Kanjirappally revealed the following.

1. Total distance of the route : 81.7 Kms.

16

2. Intra/ Inter District route : Inter District. Kottayam Dist-74.4km Idukki Dist-7.3km

3. Details of Virgin Portion : Nil.

4. Details of Road Fitness certificate : Not applicable

5. Details of Overlapping : Total overlapping- 1.8 KM. ie, 2.2% of the total route length [81.7 km] which is within the permissible limit. 1) Route portion of 1.5 KM from Krimkallumoozhy to Erumely Mosque Jn. Objectionably overlaps on Changanacherry – Changanacherry Circular scheme. 2) Route portion of 300 Meters from Mundakayam Koottickal Jn. to Mundakayam Cosway Jn. objectionably overlaps on Ernakulam – Thekkady, Trivandrum- Thekkady notified Scheme GO[P] 42/2009 trans dtd 14/07/2009.

6. Details of Vehicle produced : KL 05 AG 3553 or another Suitable vehicle. Offered vehicle is not owned by the applicant.

7. Details of Concurrence : Yes concurrence from RTA Idukki in needed.

8. Necessity, recommendation if any : Nil.

9. Court Direction, if any : Nil

10. Other relevant points : It is reported that the proposed fresh permit route is beneficial for the travelling of students and public. 11. Type of road : Mentioned in the report submitted by the field Officer.

RTA may hear the applicant, peruse the records and take a decision.

17

Item No - 09 G1/10821/2017/K

Agenda:-1.To consider the application for the grant of Fresh Regular permit to SC KL-05-L-6382 to operate on the route Pala - Perinad Via Edappady, Bharananganam, Panackapalam, Erattupetta, Thidanadu, Pinnakkanadu, , , Kanjirappally ,Chenapady, Mukkada and as ordinary service. 2.To consider the request of the applicant to consider his fresh permit application subject to counter signature of RTA .

Applicant :- Sri. Baby Antos, Parayil [H], Edamaruku.P.O, Pala.

Proposed Timings Perinad Athikkayam Kanjirappally Erattupetta Pala A D A P D A P D A P D A D 5.40am 5.50 7.00 7.05 7.45 8.18 9.45 8.58 9.05 8.25 10.06 10.46 10.47 11.20 12.34 11.54 11.21 12.50 1.30 2.03 3.22 2.40 2.42 2.07 3.51 4.31 5.04 6.21 5.39 5.41 5.06 7.55pm[H] 7.45 6.35

Notes:-

The Registered owner of the Stage Carriage KL-05-L-6382, Sri. Baby Anto has applied for the grant of fresh regular permit to operate on the route Pala - Perinad Via Edappady, Bharananganam, Panackapalam, Erattupetta, Thidanadu, Pinnakkanadu, Kalaketty, Kappadu, Kanjirappally, Chenapady, Mukkada and Athikkayam.

The enquiry report of MVI ,Pala reveals the following.

1. Total distance of the route : 63.300 Kms.

2. Intra/ Inter District route : Inter District. Kottayam Dist-47.00 kms Pathanamthitta Dist-16.300 kms

3. Details of Virgin Portion : Nil 18

4. Details of Fitness certificate : Not Applicable

5. Details of Overlapping : Total overlapping 3 Kilometers. [overlapping is in the permissible limit ,ie 5% of the total route length of 63.300kms is 3.165 km )

1) Route portion of 1.900 km from Pala Kottaramattom Bus Stand to Maharanikavala Overlaps on the Kottayam - Kattappana No.G.O[MS]139/67/PW dtd 18.07.1967 2) Route portion of 0.800 km from Kanjirappally Kurusupalli to to Pettakavala Overlaps on the Kottayam – Thekkady No.26959-TB3/66/PW notified Scheme. 3) Route portion of 0.300 km from Mukkada – Mukkada Jn overlaps on the -Changanassery GO/MS/146/67/PW

6. Details of Vehicle produced : KL-05-L-6382 is 2001 model D/R is 28/02/2002

7. Details of Concurrence : Yes, 16.300 km in RTA,Pathanamthitta 8. Necessity, recommendation if any : MVI, Pala reported that the proposed service beneficial for the passengers especially for students and also reported that the applicant was requested for one trip only from Perinad to Kanjirappally. Hence it is proposed that more trips may also be considered. 9. Court Direction, if any : Nil 10. Other relevant points : The timings of this vehicle were settled on the temporary permit allowed by the RTA by Circulation of file U/R 130 of KMVR. These timings are shown above as proposed timings.

11. Type of road : Mentioned in the report submitted by the field Officer.

Hence RTA may peruse the file, Judgment and report and take a decision.

19

Item No - 10 G1/94004/2017/K

Agenda-To consider the application for the grant of fresh regular permit to SC KL 02 R 18 / a suitable vehicle to operate on the route KURUPPUMTHARA MARKET – AYARKKUNNAM Via, Kuruppumthara Jn., Thottuva, Kuravilangadu B.S., Nazrethu Hill, Kaniyodi Jn., , Chamakkala Kurisupally, Onamthuruthu, Kottamuri, Ettumanoor B.S., Madappadu and Arumanoor as ordinary service.

Applicant- Sri. Raju Joseph, Thekkeparambil, Ettumanoor P O, Kottayam.

Proposed Timings Kuruppumthara Kuruppumthara Kuravilangadu Kothanalloor Ettumanoor Ayarkunnam Market Jn. B S A D P A D A P D A D A D 7.35 7.10am 7.58 7.55 7.40 8.00 8.03 8.18 8.25 8.50 9.20 9.25 9.45 10.35 10.15 11.35 11.10 10.40 11.58 11.55 11.40 12.10 12.13 12.28 12.35 1.00 1.30 2.45 2.20 1.50 3.08 3.05 2.50 3.27 3.30 3.45 3.50 4.15 4.45 4.50 5.10 5.40 5.20 6.40 6.15 5.45 7.00 7.25[H]

Notes- This is an application for the grant of a of a fresh regular permit to SC KL 02 R 18 / a suitable vehicle to operate on the route KURUPPUMTHARA MARKET – AYARKKUNNAM Via, Kuruppumthara Jn., Thottuva, Kuravilangadu B.S., Nazrethu Hill, Kaniyodi Jn., Kothanalloor, Chamakkala Kurisupally, Onamthuruthu, Kottamuri, Ettumanoor B.S., Madappadu and Arumanoor as ordinary service.

The enquiry report of MVI Kottayam revealed the following.

1. Total distance of the route : 37.2 Kms.

2. Intra/ Inter District route : Intra District.

3. Details of Virgin Portion : Nil.

4. Details of Road Fitness certificate : Not applicable

20

5. Details of Overlapping : Total overlapping- 1.3 KM. ie, 3.4% of the total route length [37.2 km] which is within the permissible limit. 1) Route portion of 700 Meters from Konickal Jn. to Ettumanoor B S overlaps on Kottayam - Kattappana notified Scheme GO[P] 42/2009 trans dtd 14/07/2009.

2) Route portion of 400 Meters from Kothanalloor Jn. – Thuvanisa Jn. overlaps on Ernakulam – Thekkady - notified Scheme GO[P] 42/2009 trans dtd 14/07/2009.

3) Route portion of 200 Meters from Kuravilangadu Jn. – Kuravilangadu B.S. overlaps on Kottayam – Kozhikkode notified scheme GO[P] 42/2009 trans dtd 14/07/2009. 6. Details of Vehicle produced : KL 02 R 18 or another Suitable vehicle. Offered vehicle is owned by the applicant.

7. Details of Concurrence : NA .

8. Necessity, recommendation if any : Nil.

9. Court Direction, if any : Nil

10. Other relevant points : It is reported that the proposed fresh permit route is beneficial for the travelling of students and public. Right now there is no S/C operating on the portion between Kaniyodickal Jn. – Thuvanasa Jn. & Kothanalloor Jn. – Chamakkala Kurisupally Jn. about 5 Kms and ill served by the S/C on the portion Onamthuruthu Jn. – Parappally Jn. and Kaniyodickal Jn. – Thottuva Jn. about 8 kms.

11. Type of road : Mentioned in the report submitted by the field Officer.

RTA may hear the applicant, peruse the records and take a decision.

21

Item No - 11 G/54913/2016/K

Agenda – 1) To peruse the Judgment in WPC No 26385 of 2017 dated 09/08/2017

2)To consider the Modified Application for the grant of a fresh regular permit to SC KL 38 A 3477 / a suitable vehicle to operate on the route Kottaramattom BS(Pala) – Kanjirappaly - Kalathuva Via Bharananganam, Panakkapalam, Erattupetta, Thidanadu, Pinnakkanadu, , Kaippaly, Klathuva as ordinary service.

Applicant:- Sri.Baby Antose,Parayil H, Edamaruku P O,Pala.

Notes:- The applicant is the R/O of SC KL 38 A 3477 has applied for the grant of a fresh regular permit /04 months temporary permit U/S 87(1) c of MV Act to operate on the route Kottaramattom BS(Pala) – Kanjirappaly - Kalathuva Via Bharananganam, Panakkapalam, Erattupetta, Thidanadu, Pinnakkanadu, Poonjar, Kaippaly, Klathuva as ordinary service.(Modified application).

Proposed Timings

Kalathuva Kanjirappally Erattupetta Pala

A D A D A P D A D 6.59 6.15 (S) 7.05 7.49 8.20 8.57 8.26 9.49 9.05 11.12 9.50 10.34 11.15 11.53 12.47 12.03 12.50 1.34 2.05 2.37 2.06 3.28 2.44 3.50 4.34 5.05 6.25 5.49 7.14 6.30 7.25 8.09 (H)

22

The enquiry report of MVI Pala reveals the following.

1. Total distance of the route : 45.700 Kms.

2. Intra/ Inter District route : Intra District.

3. Details of Virgin Portion : Nil

4. Details of Fitness certificate : Not Applicable

5. Details of Overlapping : Total overlapping 2.2 Kilometers. (ie below 5% of the total route length 45.700 kms)

4) Route portion of 1.900 kms from Kottaramattam bus stop to Maharani jn Overlaps on the Kottayam-Kattappana notified Scheme. 5) Route portion of 300 meters from Petta kavala to Kanjirappally Overlaps on the Kottayam-Thekkady notified Scheme.

6. Details of Vehicle produced : KL-38-A-3477 or Suitable vehicle. Offered vehicle is a 2009 model vehicle which is possessed by the applicant.

7. Details of Concurrence : NA

8. Necessity, recommendation if any : Yes. The applicant is requested for one trip only from Erattupetta to Kalathua. Hence it is proposed that more trips may also be considered in morning time and evening time. That is very beneficial for people in Kaippally and Kalathua area especially for the students of Poonjar Engg. College.

9. Court Direction, if any : Yes. As per order in WPC No 26385 of 2017 dated 09/08/2017, Honorable HC directed the RTA to consider the modified application submitted by the petitioner at the earliest.

10. Other relevant points : Nil

11. Type of road : Mentioned in the report submitted by the field Officer.

Hence RTA may peruse the file, Judgment and report and take a decision.

23

Item No - 12 G1/12382/2017/K

Agenda-To consider the application for the grant of fresh regular permit to SC KL 33 C 5112 / a suitable vehicle to operate on the route – KANJIRAPPALLY Via, Chamampathal, Ullayam, , Pazhayidam, Mannarakkayam, Anchilippa, Chenappady as ordinary service.

Applicant- Smt. Jessy Mathew, Vazhiplackal, Nedumkunnam P O, Changanacherry.

Proposed Timings Kodungoor Chamampathal Manimala Kanjirappally Chenappady A D A D A P D A P D A D 5.42 5.15am 5.50 6.17 6.50 7.49 7.33 7.00 7.52 8.08 8.41 9.39 9.23 8.50 9.45 10.01 10.34 10.54 12.43 12.10 11.50 1.00 1.33 2.13 1.40 2.22 2.55 3.33 3.00 3.40 4.13 5.13 4.40 5.20 5.53 7.07 6.45 6.12 7.30 7.57pm[H]

Notes- This is an application for the grant of a of a fresh regular permit to SC KL 33 C 5112 / a suitable vehicle to operate on the route KODUNGOOR – KANJIRAPPALLY Via, Chamampathal, Ullayam, Manimala, Pazhayidam, Mannarakkayam, Anchilippa, Chenappady as ordinary service.

The enquiry report of MVI Kottayam revealed the following.

1. Total distance of the route : 29.3 Kms.

2. Intra/ Inter District route : Intra District.

3. Details of Virgin Portion : Nil.

4. Details of Road Fitness certificate : Not applicable 24

5. Details of Overlapping : Total overlapping- 0.6 KM. ie, 2.04% of the total route length [29.3 km] which is within the permissible limit. 1) Route portion of 500 Meters from Kanjirappally kurisukavala to Kanjirappally B S overlaps on Kottayam – Thekkady and Ernakulam – Thekkady, CHRY – CHRY Circular and Trivandrum - Thekkady notified Scheme.

2) Route portion of 100 Meters from Manimala B S to Manimala Brdge Jn. on CHRY – CHRY Circular 6. Details of Vehicle produced : KL 33 C 5112 or another Suitable vehicle. Offered vehicle is owned by the applicant.

7. Details of Concurrence : NA.

8. Necessity, recommendation if any : Nil.

9. Court Direction, if any : Nil

10. Other relevant points : It is reported that the proposed fresh permit route is beneficial for the travelling of students and public. 11. Type of road : Mentioned in the report submitted by the field Officer.

RTA may hear the applicant, peruse the records and take a decision.

25

Item No -13 G1/13670/2016

Agenda :- To consider the adjourned application for the grant of fresh regular permit to SC KL 05 Q 399 or a Suitable vehicle to operate on the route 70th Acre - Kottayam Nagampadom BS Via , Mukkoottuthara, MES College, Erumely, Peroothode, Elivalikkara, Venkurinji, , Mannadisala, Athikkayam Kannampally, Ranny, Athikkayam, Edaman, Edamury, Mukkada, Chenappady, Kanjirappally, Thampalakkadu, , Pallikkathode, Oravakkal, Manrcadu,Thiruvanchoor,Vattamoodupalam and Nagampadom as Ordinary service.

Applicant:-Sri. Thomas V Philip,Vavolickal H Pulickal Kavala P O,,Kottayam

Ref:- Decision of RTA Kottayam dtd 01/09/2016 Item No 38.

PROPOSED TIMINGS

70 Acre Erumely Mukkoottuthara Kottayam A D A D A D A D A D 6.25 [S] 7.05 7.13 8.35 8.50 12.10 3.37 12.40 4.00 5.53 7.28 [H] 6.52

Notes:-

This item was placed before the RTA Kottayam dtd 01/09/2016 took the following decision.

“ Heard The learned counsel represented the applicant. Perused the file and report. This

is an inter district route in which 38.5 kms lies in .

1) Secretary RTA is directed to seek concurrence from RTA Pathanamthitta

2) Inorder to consider the application as and when getting concurrence the Registered Owner is directed to produce a later model vehicle not more than five years.

3) Hence adjourned.”

Now the RTA Pathanamthitta has granted concurrence in vide Order No G1/6698/2016/PTA dtd 29/03/2017 vide Item No 57. The applicant has produced current records of a later model vehicle S/C KL 33 F 1214 owned by the applicant. [Tax-30/09/2017 Ic- 22/12/2017 Cf- 08/12/2018]

The enquiry report of MVI Kanjirappally reveals the following.

1. Total distance of the route : 110.3 Kms.

26

2. Intra/ Inter District route : Inter District. [Kottayam-71.8 km Patahanamthitta – 38.5km.

3. Details of Virgin Portion : Nil

4. Details of Fitness certificate : Not Applicable

. 5. Details of Overlapping : Total overlapping 3.300 kilo meters which is 2.9 % of the total route length of 110.3km. 1) Route portion of 1.300kms + 300meters from Chethonkara to Ranni and Rubberboard Jn to Mukkada overlapping on Kottayam - Punalur (via Ranni) notified Scheme. 2) Route portion of 600 meters from Kanjirappally Kuisu Junction to Kanjirappally Bus stand overlapping on Kottayam-Thekkady,Ernakulam-Thekkady,TVM-Thekkady,CHRY-CHRY (circular) Schemes.

3) Route portion of 1.1 kilometers from Kottayam Mathrubhoomi Junction to Gomathy pump overlapping on Kottayam-,Ernakulam-Thekkady, Schemes.

6. Details of Vehicle produced : KL 05 Q 399 or Suitable vehicle. Now produced current records of a later model vehicle S/C KL 33 F 1214 owned by the applicant.

7. Details of Concurrence : 38.5 kilometers of the route lies in Pathanamthitta District and RTA Pathanamthitta has granted concurrence in vide Order No G1/6698/2016/PTA dtd 29/03/2017 vide Item No 57.

8. Necessity, recommendation if any : No necessity U/S 87(1) c is reported.

9. Court Direction, if any : NIL

10. Other relevant points :.The offered permit is beneficial to the travelling public and students of the area 70 Acre, Chathenthara towards Mukkoottuthara and Erumely Towns.There is no direct service from Ranni to Erumely.Therev are number of SC/ST colonies, Govt Schools, Govt VHSE and Govt. Hospitals situated in the proposed route.There is no direct service from Kanjirappally to Kottayam via Pllickathodu, Thiruvanchoor and newly opened bridge (VATTAMOODU)

11. Type of road : Mentioned in the report submitted by the field Officer.

RTA may hear the applicant, peruse the records and take a decision.

27

Item No - 14 G1/93199/2016 K

Agenda- To consider the adjourned application for the grant of Fresh Regular Permit to SC KL 34 C 2043 / another suitable vehicle to operate on the route - Via Koorali, , Pala, Valavoor, Uzhavoor as ordinary service.

Applicant- Sri. Sreejesh M.G, Valiyamundackal, Elikulam PO, Kanjirappally.

Ref:- Decision of RTA Kottayam dtd 02/02/2017 vide Item No 2.

Proposed Timings Ponkunnam Pala [KTMTM] Uzhavoor Veliyannoor A D A D A P D A D 6.52[S] 7.54 8.10 8.50 9.00 10.00 9.20 9.10 11.06 10.04 12.01 1.03 1.20 2.00 2.10 3.01 2.21 2.11 4.07 3.05 4.50 5.52 5.53 6.33 6.43 7.45 7.05 6.55 8.57[H] 7.55

Notes- This is an application for the grant of fresh regular permit to SC KL 34 C 2043 / another suitable vehicle to operate on the route PONKUNNAM - VELIYANNOOR Via Koorali, Paika, Pala, Valavoor, Uzhavoor as ordinary service. This item was placed before the RTA Kottayam dtd 02/02/2017 vide Item No 2, the RTA took the following decision in vide Order No G1/93199/2016/K dtd 02/02/2017. “Heard the learned counsel represented the applicant. Considered the application for the grant of fresh RP/4 months TP to SC KL 05 R 6147/another suitable vehicle to operate on the route Ponkunnam - Veliyannoor Via Koorali, Paika, Pala, Valavoor, Uzhavoor as ordinary service from the date of issue, perused the file and report The route applied is Ponkunnam - Veliyannoor Via Koorali, Paika, Pala, Valavoor, Uzhavoor. The MVI report and sketch obtained is not clear to this authority whether the vehicle is regulated through Pala Town in obedience to the judgments in MVAA No 196/2014 dated 29/10/2014 and MVARP No 262/2014 dated 19/05/2015 of Honble STAT Ernakulam. Hence Secretary RTA is directed to obtain a specific report from the field officer with detailed sketch and then place before the RTA. Hence adjourned.”

Now the MVI Pala has submitted a detailed report with route map as follows. 1.The proposed route is Ponkunnam – Veliyannoor via, Koorali, Paika, Pala, Valavoor and Uzhavoor. 2.The total route length of the proposed route is 41.600 km. 100 meters overlapping comes in Kottayam – Thekkady scheme ie, Ponkunnam Kurisukavala to Ponkunnam Bus Stand. 1.600 kms 28

overlapping comes in Kottayam – Kattappana scheme ie, from Kottaramattom B S to Pala Stadium Jn. Hence total distance of overlapping is 1.7 Kms. This is less than 5% of the total route length. 3.The operator demanded 4 trips touching Pala Town. 4.The Traffic Advisory Committee submitted a proposal that the stage carriages coming from Uzhavoor and Ramapuram area shall be reached at Kottaramattom Bus Stand through Kurisupally Jn., River View Road and Pala Old Bus Stand. In return, the stage carriages shall passing through Taluk Hospital – Kurisupally Jn. – Ramapuram Road. The proposal approved by the RTA, Kottayam vide Order No G3/1227/2010/K dtd 01/03/2011. 5.In the above circumstances, the route of Ponkunnam – Veliyannoor via, Koorali, Paika, Kottaramattom B S, Pala Taluk Hospital Jn., Kurisupally Jn., Valavoor, Uzhavoor without touching Pala Old Bus Stand may be considered. In return trip from Veliyannoor to Ponkunnam may be considered as Uzhavoor, Valavoor, Kurisupally Jn., River Vioew road, Pala Old Bus Stand, Kottaramattom B S, Paika, Koorali. 6.Present traffic plan of Pala Town also submitted.

1. Total distance of the route : 41.600 Kms.

2. Intra/ Inter District route : Intra District.

3. Details of Virgin Portion : Nil

4. Details of Fitness certificate : Not Applicable

5.Nature of route : Moffusil

6. Details of Overlapping : Total overlapping 1.6 kms . Route portion of 0.1 km at Ponkunnam to reach bus stand Overlaps on the Kottayam - Thekkady, Ernakulam - Thekkady, CHRY – CHRY (Circular) and Trivandrum - Thekkady notified Scheme. 1.5 kms from Kottaramattom to Stadium Jn overlaps on Kottayam- -Kattappana notified Scheme. 7. Details of Vehicle produced : KL 34 C 2043 / another suitable vehicle owned by the applicant. 8. Details of Concurrence : Not Applicable

9. Necessity, recommendation if any : Nil

10. Court Direction, if any : Nil

11. Other relevant points : NIL

12. Type of road : Mentioned in the report submitted by the field Officer.

RTA may hear the applicant, peruse the records and take a decision. 29

Item No - 15 G1/40870/2017/K

Agenda-1.To peruse the judgment of Honorable STAT in MVAA No 98/2016. 2.To consider the application for the grant of 4 months temporary permit U/S 87[1][c] to SC KL 03 J 3548 / another suitable vehicle to operate on the route KOTTAYAM – KATTADY Via, Chungam, Varisserry, Pullarikkunnu, Thoothootty, Kudamaloor Church, Panampalam, Medical College, Koloth Temple, Navajeevan, Cherupushpam Church, Manaleppally as Town service.

Applicant- Sri. M M James, Mazhuvancherril, Thellakom P O, Kottayam.

Ref:- Judgment of Honorable High Court of in WP[c] No 30359/2017 dtd 17/10/2017 and W.A.No.993 of 2017 dtd 15/06/2017.

Notes:- The registered owner of the SC KL 03 J 3548 has applied for the grant of a temporary permit of four months duration U/S 87(1) c of MV Act to operate on the route Kottayam - Kattady Via Chungam, Varisserry, Pullarikkunnu, Thoothootty, Kudamaloor Church, Panampalam, Medical College,Koloth Temple, Navajeevan, Cherupushpam Church, Manaleppally and as Town service, from the date of issue.

The enquiry officer reported that, this is an intra district route having a distance of 11.8 Km. Enquiry officer also reported that applied route portion of 3.9 Km (from Baker Junction to Varisserry (2 Km) and from Kudamaloor to Medical College(1.9 Km) objectionably overlaps on Kottayam- Complete exclusion Scheme and 500 meters from Gomathy Junction to Baker Junction objectionably overlaps on the Ernakulam-Thekkady notified Scheme. On perusal of the report it is found that 3.9 Km of the applied route objectionably overlaps on the Kottayam - Neendoor Complete exclusion Scheme. Kottayam – Neendoor is a complete exclusion scheme, vide Govt. notification no. 34626/TC2/64/PW dated 06/05/1965. Private stage carriage operators are prohibited from plying stage carriage services even on part of a complete exclusion scheme. Even the entry with corridor restrictions, is not allowed. (Adharsh Travels Bus Service Vs State of UP, AIR 1986 SC 319).

More over the applied route is having a total distance of 11.8 Km out of which 4.4 Km of the applied route objectionably overlaps on various notified Schemes. As per notification No 42/2009/Trnas dtd 14/07/2009, a private operator is permitted to overlap on notified route mentioned there in by 5 Km or 5 % of the length of their own route, whichever is less on the notified route for the purpose of intersection. In this case the overlapping exceeds the maximum permissible limit.

Honorable High Court also held that a private operator of stage carriage service traversing the same line of travel on a notified route cannot be permitted to overlap for a distance beyond the limit prescribed on the ground that it is an inevitable intersection [2013(2) KLT 280]. 30

The applicant was produced a Judgment in WPC No.15215/2016 dated 19/04/2016. The application was considered in the light of the Judgment in WPC No.15215/2016 and rejected by the Sy RTA Kottayam and issued proceedings in vide order No G1/40870/2016/K dtd 10/05/2016. Against the rejection, the applicant was approached Honorable STAT and produced a Judgment in MVAA No 98/2016. In this judgment the appeal is allowed in part by the Honorable STAT. The impugned order is set aside. The matter is remanded back to the authority concerned. The Authority shall consider the matter afresh in the light of the discussion made herein above and pass fresh orders, after hearing both parties [ie, Applicant & KSRTC]. The applicant and KSRTC were heard and KSRTC submitted their objection that not to allow permit on Kottayam – Kattady route. The Judgment in WP[c] No 30359/2017 dtd 17/10/2017 of Division bench of Honorable High court of Kerala states that no temporary permit U/S 87[1][c] shall be granted.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant, peruse the judgments, file and take a decision.

31

Item No - 16 G1/126613/2017/K

Agenda-1.To peruse the judgment dtd 02/11/2017 of Honorable High Court of Kerala in WP[c] No 35010/2017. 2.To consider the application for the re issue of 04 months TP U/S 87(1) C of MV Act to leased SC KL 05 AC 8056 by replacing KL 06 D 7024 on the route Koruthode - Kottayam Via Mundakkayam, Kanjirappally, Ponkunnam, Kodungoor, 14th Mile, Pampady, Manarcadu and Kanjikuzhy in the vacancy of SC KEK 8611.

Apllicant- Sri. T V John, Thekkanattu H, Thottacadu P O, Puthuppally, Chanaganacherry.

Ref:- Judgment dtd 17/10/2017 in WP[c] No 30359/2017 and WA No 993/2017 dtd 15/06/2017 of Division bench of Honorable High Court of Kerala.

Notes- SC KEK 8611 held a regular permit to operate on the route Koruthode - Kottayam. When permit holder discontinued the route, other operators have been operating on this route in the vacant timings of SC KEK 8611 since the year 2000. Registered Owner of SC KL 05 J 7530 operated in the vacancy of SC KEK 8611 from 04/05/2004 to 03/06/2012 on the strength of TP issued U/S 104 of the MV Act. There after R/O of SC KL 06 D 7024 has been operating service on the route Koruthode - Kottayam in the vacancy of SC KEK 8611 on the strength of TP issued U/S 104/87(1) c of the MV Act from 04/06/2012 onwards. Last of such TP issued is valid till 30/10/2014 .There after application for the re issue of TP U/S 104 of MV Act submitted by the applicant was rejected by the RTA in its sitting on 16/11/2013, stating the following reason.

“Heard. This is an application for the re issue of 04 months TP U/S 104 of MV Act in respect of SC KL 06 D 7024 to operate on the route Koruthodei-Kottayam.As per Judgment of Honorable High Court of Kerala in WA No.1943/2012 and 1957 of 2012 dated 23/08/2013,wherein the Division Bench has pointed out that on the basis of Judgment of Honorable Supreme Court in UP State RTC Vs Sanjitha Bhanu & others(2005 KHC1697 & 2005(10) SCC 250),that the private stage carriage operators have no right to claim any grant of stage carriage temporary permits on the notified route or portions there of.It has ordered that once the scheme is in force and the overlapping is permitted only to a certain extent,it is not possible to grant temporary permit based on the proviso to Section 104 of the MV Act.The benefit of the proviso to section 104 can be granted only in instances where there is no scheme and where no permits have been issued in such route. The proviso to section 104 cannot have any independent application and it is subject to the scheme framed by the Govt.in nationalized routes.

In this case, the applied route is of 60 Kms. Route portion from Kottayam to Mundakkayam 52 Kms overlaps on the notified Ernakulam-Thekkady and Kottayam-Thekkady Schemes and from 14th Mile to 26the Mile 24 Kms of the route overlaps on the notified Chry- Chry Circular Scheme. KSRTC vehemently objected the grant. Hence rejected”.

32

Then the vehicle has been issued with a 04 months TP in compliance to the Judgment of the Honorable HC of Kerala in WPC No.13577/2014 dated 29/05/2014. Thereafter RTA held from time to time has granted 04 months temporary permit U/S 87(1) c of MV Act. Last of such temporary permit issued by the RTA held on 25/07/2017 was valid till 28/12/2017.

Now the applicant submitted an application for the re issue of a 04 months Temporary permit U/S 87(1) c of MV Act to a leased vehicle KL 05 AC 8056 along with a judgment dtd 02/11/2017 of Honorable High Court of Kerala in WP[c] No 35010/2017 in which it directed the Secretary RTA to consider the request for issue TP U/S 87 [1][c] of MV Act to the leased S/C KL 05 AC 8056 by replacing KL 06 D 7024, from the date of expiry of the existing TP. As per the report of MVI Kottayam that there is no necessity U/S 87(1) c of MV Act.

The vehicle has been conducting service for the past few years, with a settled set of timings. Judgment dtd 17/10/2017 in WP[c] No 30359/2017 and WA No 993/2017 dtd 15/06/2017 of Division bench of Honorable High Court of Kerala states that no temporary permit U/S 87[1][a], [b] [c] is granted.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant peruse the judgments and take a decision.

33

Item No - 17 G1/121925/2017/K

Agenda-To consider the application for the re issue of 04 months TP U/S 87(1) C of MV Act to SC KL 05 S 190 on the route Ranni - Kottayam Via Palcherry, Manimala, Chamampathal, Manimala, Kodungoor, 14th Mile, Pampady, Manarcadu and Kanjikuzhy, in the vacancy of SC KRK 8330, from the date of expiry of the existing TP.

Applicant :- Sri. Sajumon J Mattathil, Poovappally Mattathil, Parampuzha, Kottayam.

Ref:- Judgment dtd 17/10/2017 in WP[c] No 30359/2017 and WA No 993/2017 dtd 15/06/2017 of Division bench of Honorable High Court of Kerala.

Notes- SC KRK 8330 had a permit to operate on the route Ranni - Kottayam. When the route was abandoned by the permit holder, Sri. Sajimon J Mattathil was applied for the grant of fresh regular permit to operate on the route Ranni - Kottayam to his vehicle KL 07 J 8343. The regular permit application submitted by the applicant has rejected by the RTA Kottayam dated 29/07/2013 stating that the applied route objectionably overlaps on the notified portion from Kottayam to Kodungoor (27.8 Kms) on Ernakulam-Thekkady and Kottayam-Thekkady Scheme and from Palcherry to Ranny(07 Kms) on Chry-Chry Circular Scheme. There after the applicant has been operating service on this route on the strength of TP issued U/S 104 of MV Act with his various vehicles. Last of such TP issued to SC KL 05 S 190 was valid till 22/01/2014. Thereafter, application for the re issue of TP U/S 104 of MV Act submitted by the R/O of SC KL 05 S 190 has been rejected by the RTA Kottayam held on 16/11/2013 stating the following reason. Heard. This is an application for the re issue of 04 months TP U/S 104 of MV Act in respect of SC KL 05 S 190 to operate on the route Ranni-Kottayam. As per Judgment of Honorable High Court of Kerala in WA No.1943/2012 and 1957 of 2012 dated 23/08/2013, wherein the Division Bench has pointed out that on the basis of Judgment of Honorable Supreme Court in UP State RTC Vs Sanjitha Bhanu & others (2005 KHC1697 & 2005(10) SCC 250), that the private stage carriage operators have no right to claim any grant of stage carriage temporary permits on the notified route or portions thereof. It has ordered that once the scheme is in force and the overlapping is permitted only to a certain extent, it is not possible to grant temporary permit based on the proviso to Section 104 of the MV Act. The benefit of the proviso to section 104 can be granted only in instances where there is no scheme and where no permits have been issued in such route. The proviso to section 104 cannot have any independent application and it is subject to the scheme framed by the Govt. in nationalized routes. In this case the applied route is of 56 Kms. 27.8 Kms of the route overlaps on the notified Scheme Ernakulam-Thekkady,06 Kms from 14th Mile to Kodungoor overlaps on the notified Chry-Chry scheme and 07 Kms from Erumely to Ranny overlaps on the notified Erumely-Ranny scheme. KSRTC vehemently objected the grant. Hence rejected. There after the vehicle had issued with a 04 months Temporary permit in compliance to the Judgment of Honorable HC of Kerala in WPC No.12160/2014 dated 34

09/05/2014. Now the vehicle is operating on the strength of 04 months TP issued U/S 87(1) c of the MV Act, as per the decision of RTA Kottayam held on 25/07/2017 which is valid till 07/01/2018.

Now the applicant submitted an application for the re issue of a 04 months Temporary permit U/S 87(1) c of MV Act, from the date of expiry of the existing TP. MVI Kottayam reported that no necessity U/S 87(1) c of MV Act.

The vehicle has been conducting service for the past few years, with a settled set of timings.

Judgment dtd 17/10/2017 in WP[c] No 30359/2017 and WA No 993/2017 dtd 15/06/2017 of Division bench of Honorable High Court of Kerala states that no temporary permit U/S 87[1][a], [b] [c] is granted.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant peruse the judgment and take a decision.

35

Item No - 18 G1/121931/2017/K

Agenda-To consider the application for the re issue of Temporary permit U/S 87(1) C of the MV Act to SC KL 36 9190 to operate on the route - Kottayam Via Kumaranelloor, Med.College, Mannanam, Neendoor, Kallara, and in the vacancy of SC KL 17 A 18, from the date of expiry of the existing TP.

Ref- Application from Sri. U P Vasudevan,Ulakumparambil H, Kallara South.

Ref:- Judgment dtd 17/10/2017 in WP[c] No 30359/2017 and WA No 993/2017 dtd 15/06/2017 of Division bench of Honorable High Court of Kerala

Notes- SC KL 17 A 18 was permitted to operate on the route Vaikom - Kottayam on the strength of a regular permit valid up to 03/09/2005.The regular permit renewal application submitted by the permit holder has rejected by the RTA stating objectionable overlapping. There after SC KL 36 9190 has been operating in place of the route bus on the strength of TP issued U/S 104 of MV Act till 22/01/2014. Application for the re issue of TP U/S 104 of MV Act has been rejected by the RTA Kottayam held on 16/11/2013 stating the following reason. “Heard. This is an application for the re issue of 04 months TP U/S 104 of MV Act in respect of SC KL 36 9190 to operate on the route Kottayam - Vaikom.

As per Judgment of Honorable High Court of Kerala in WA No.1943/2012 and 1957 of 2012 dated 23/08/2013, wherein the Division Bench has pointed out that on the basis of Judgment of Honorable Supreme Court in UP State RTC Vs Sanjitha Bhanu & others(2005 KHC1697 & 2005(10) SCC 250),that the private stage carriage operators have no right to claim any grant of stage carriage temporary permits on the notified route or portions thereof. It has ordered that once the scheme is in force and the overlapping is permitted only to a certain extent, it is not possible to grant temporary permit based on the proviso to Section 104 of the MV Act. The benefit of the proviso to section 104 can be granted only in instances where there is no scheme and where no permits have been issued in such route. The proviso to section 104 cannot have any independent application and it is subject to the scheme framed by the Govt. in nationalized routes.

In this case the applied route is of 44 Kms. Route portion from Kottayam to Gandhi Nagar 06 Kms, Med.College to Neendoor 09 Kms and to Vaikom 16 Kms overlaps on the notified Kottayam - Aluva, Kottayam - Neendoor and Ernakulam-Thekkady respectievely. KSRTC vehemently objected the grant. Hence, rejected.”

Then the vehicle has been issued with a 04 months TP in compliance to the Judgment of the Honorable HC of Kerala in WPC No.11197/2014 dated 22/04/2014. Thereafter RTA held from time to time has granted 04 months temporary permit U/S 87(1) c of MV Act. Last of such temporary permit issued by the RTA held on 25/07/2017 was valid till 29/12/2017.

36

Now the applicant submitted an application for the re issue of a 04 months Temporary permit U/S 87(1) c of MV Act, from the date of expiry of the existing TP. MVI Kottayam reported that no necessity U/S 87(1) c of MV Act.

The vehicle has been conducting service for the past few years, with a settled set of timings.

Judgment dtd 17/10/2017 in WP[c] No 30359/2017 and WA No 993/2017 dtd 15/06/2017 of Division bench of Honorable High Court of Kerala states that no temporary permit U/S 87[1][a], [b] [c] is granted.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant peruse the judgment and take a decision.

37

Item No - 19 G1/117461/2017/K

Agenda-1) To consider the application for the re issue of a 04 months Temporary permit U/S 87(1) c of MV Act to SC KL 05 V 2963 to operate on the route S N Puram - Kottayam Via , Lakkattoor, Kothamangalapady, Poothirickal, Oravackal, Manrcadu and Kanjikuzhy in the vacancy of a defaulted service.

Applicant- Smt. Suma Lalu,Pareparambil,S N Puram P O,Kottayam.

Ref:- Judgment dtd 17/10/2017 in WP[c] No 30359/2017 and WA No 993/2017 dtd 15/06/2017 of Division bench of Honorable High Court of Kerala

Notes- On 04/08/2001, Smt. Suma Lalu was applied for the grant of fresh regular permit/04 months TP to operate on the route S N Puram - Kottayam to his vehicle KL 05 D 3060.The regular permit application submitted by the applicant has rejected by the RTA Kottayam held on 07/08/2007 stating that the applied route objectionably overlaps for a distance of 08 Kms from Kottayam to Manarcadu on the notified Ernakulam-Thekkady and Kottayam-Thekkady Scheme. There after the applicant had been operated on this route on the strength of TP issued U/S 104 of MV Act with his various vehicle. Later application for the re issue of TP U/S 104 of MV Act submitted by the R/O of SC KL 05 V 2963 has been rejected by the RTA Kottayam held on 16/11/2013 stating the following reason.

Heard.This is an application for the re issue of 04 months TP U/S 104 of MV Act in respect of SC KL 05 V 2963 to operate on the route S N Puram-Kottayam.As per Judgment of Honorable High Court of Kerala in WA No.1943/2012 and 1957 of 2012 dated 23/08/2013, wherein the Division Bench has pointed out that on the basis of Judgment of Honorable Supreme Court in UP State RTC Vs Sanjitha Bhanu & others(2005 KHC1697 & 2005(10) SCC 250),that the private stage carriage operators have no right to claim any grant of stage carriage temporary permits on the notified route or portions thereof. It has ordered that once the scheme is in force and the overlapping is permitted only to a certain extent, it is not possible to grant temporary permit based on the proviso to Section 104 of the MV Act.The benefit of the proviso to section 104 can be granted only in instances where there is no scheme and where no permits have been issued in such route. The proviso to section 104 cannot have any independent application and it is subject to the scheme framed by the Govt.in nationalized routes.

In this case the applied route is of 22 Kms. 08 Kms of the route portion from Kottayam to Manarcadu overlaps on the notified Ernakulam-Thekkady and Kottayam-Thekkady Scheme. KSRTC vehemently objected the grant. Hence rejected. 38

Then the vehicle has been operating on this route on the strength of temporary permit issued by the RTA Kottayam dated 14/08/2014. On the expiry of that temporary permit applicant produced a copy of the Judgment of the Honorable HC of Kerala in WPC No.35478/2014 dated 30/12/2014, in which it is ordered to re issue TP for 04 months, within one week from the date of production of the order, subject to preferential claim, if any. In order to comply the order within the time frame, Sy, RTA granted TP for 04 months to SC KL 05 V 2963 which is valid up to 21/05/2015. There after the vehicle has been operating on the strength of Temporary permit granted by the RTA Kottayam U/S 87(1) c of MV Act. Existing TP covered with the vehicle issued as per the decision of the RTA dated 25/07/2017 is valid till 29/12/2017. Now the applicant submitted an application for the re issue of a 04 months Temporary permit U/S 87(1) c of MV Act, from the date of expiry of the existing TP. MVI Kottayam reported that no necessity U/S 87(1) c of MV Act.

The vehicle has been conducting service for the past few years, with a settled set of timings.

Judgment dtd 17/10/2017 in WP[c] No 30359/2017 and WA No 993/2017 dtd 15/06/2017 of Division bench of Honorable High Court of Kerala states that no temporary permit U/S 87[1][a], [b] [c] is granted.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant peruse the judgment and take a decision.

39

Item No - 20 G1/121929/2017/K

Agenda-To consider the application for the re issue of a 04 months TP U/S 87(1) C of MV Act to SC KL 05 P 7891 on the route Temple - Kottayam Via Perunna, Chanaganacherry, Mathumoola, Thuruthy, Plamoodu, , , Mavilangu, Bukkana, Nattakom and Manipuzha, in the vacancy of a defaulted service, from the date of expiry of the existing TP.

Applicant:- Sri. Shijo Thampi, Ampalakadavil H, Kurichy, Kottayam.

Ref:- Judgment dtd 17/10/2017 in WP[c] No 30359/2017 and WA No 993/2017 dtd 15/06/2017 of Division bench of Honorable High Court of Kerala.

Notes- On 11/05/2004,Sri.Shijo Thampi was applied for the grant of fresh regular permit/04 months TP to operate on the route Perunna Temple-Kottayam to his vehicle KL 05 F 4275.The regular permit application submitted by the applicant has rejected by the RTA Kottayam held on 19/07/2004 stating that the applied route objectionably overlaps for a distance of 17.4 Kms on the notified Kottayam - Scheme. There after the applicant has been operating service on this route on the strength of TP issued U/S 104 of MV Act with his various vehicles. Last of such TP issued to SC KL 05 P 7891 was valid till 22/01/2014. Thereafter, application for the re issue of TP U/S 104 of MV Act submitted by the R/O of SC KL 05 P 7891 has been rejected by the RTA Kottayam held on 16/11/2013 stating the following reason.

As per Judgment of Honorable High Court of Kerala in WA No.1943/2012 and 1957 of 2012 dated 23/08/2013, wherein the Division Bench has pointed out that on the basis of Judgment of Honorable Supreme Court in UP State RTC Vs Sanjitha Bhanu & others(2005 KHC1697 & 2005(10) SCC 250),that the private stage carriage operators have no right to claim any grant of stage carriage temporary permits on the notified route or portions thereof. It has ordered that once the scheme is in force and the overlapping is permitted only to a certain extent, it is not possible to grant temporary permit based on the proviso to Section 104 of the MV Act. The benefit of the proviso to section 104 can be granted only in instances where there is no scheme and where no permits have been issued in such route. The proviso to section 104 cannot have any independent application and it is subject to the scheme framed by the Govt. in nationalized routes.

In this case the applied route is of 21.8 Kms. 17 Kms of the route overlaps on the notified Scheme Kottayam-Kottarakkara. KSRTC vehemently objected the grant. Hence rejected.

Then the vehicle has been issued with a 04 months TP in compliance to the Judgment of the Honorable HC of Kerala in WPC No.12161/2014 dated 09/05/2014. Thereafter RTA held from time to time has granted 04 months temporary permit U/S 87(1) c of MV Act. Last of such temporary permit issued by the RTA held on 25/07/2017 was valid till 29/12/2017.

40

Now the applicant submitted an application for the re issue of a 04 months Temporary permit U/S 87(1) c of MV Act, from the date of expiry of the existing TP. MVI Kottayam reported that no necessity U/S 87(1) c of MV Act.

The vehicle has been conducting service for the past few years, with a settled set of timings.

Judgment dtd 17/10/2017 in WP[c] No 30359/2017 and WA No 993/2017 dtd 15/06/2017 of Division bench of Honorable High Court of Kerala states that no temporary permit U/S 87[1][a], [b] [c] is granted.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant peruse the judgment and take a decision.

41

Item No - 21 G1/121928/2017/K

Agenda-To consider the application for the re issue of a 04 months TP U/S 87(1) C of MV Act to SC KL 05 P 6777 to operate on the route on the route -Kidangoor Via Vaikom, Thalayolaparambu, Kaduthuruthy, Kuruppunthara, Kuravilangadu,Marangattupally and Pala in the vacancy of SC KL 05 H 6212.

Applicant-Sri. Babu, Mandapathil, Mevida P O, Pala

Ref:- Judgment dtd 17/10/2017 in WP[c] No 30359/2017 and WA No 993/2017 dtd 15/06/2017 of Division bench of Honorable High Court of Kerala.

Notes- SC KL 05 H 6212 held a regular permit to operate on the route Vechoor - Kidangoor valid till 29/03/2005. When permit holder discontinued the route, registered Owner of SC KL 03 K 4369 Sri. Babu, Mandapathil, Pala, had been operated on this route in the vacancy of SC KL 05 H 6212 till 21/01/2014 on the strength of TP issued U/S 104 of MV Act. There after application for the re issue of TP U/S 104 of MV Act submitted by the applicant was rejected by the RTA in its sitting on 16/11/2013,stating the following reason.

Heard. This is an application for the re issue of 04 months TP U/S 104 of MV Act in respect of SC KL 03 K 4369 to operate on the route Vechoor - Kidangoor.As per Judgment of Honorable High Court of Kerala in WA No.1943/2012 and 1957 of 2012 dated 23/08/2013,wherein the Division Bench has pointed out that on the basis of Judgment of Honorable Supreme Court in UP State RTC Vs Sanjitha Bhanu & others(2005 KHC1697 & 2005(10) SCC 250),that the private stage carriage operators have no right to claim any grant of stage carriage temporary permits on the notified route or portions there of. It has ordered that once the scheme is in force and the overlapping is permitted only to a certain extent, it is not possible to grant temporary permit based on the proviso to Section 104 of the MV Act. The benefit of the proviso to section 104 can be granted only in instances where there is no scheme and where no permits have been issued in such route. The proviso to section 104 cannot have any independent application and it is subject to the scheme framed by the Govt. in nationalized routes.

In this case the applied route is of 62 Kms.Route portion from Vaikom to Kuruppunthara (19 Kms) overlaps on the notified Ernakulam-Thekkady and from Pala to Kidangoor (10 Kms) overlaps on the notified Kottayam-KattappanaScheme.KSRTC whehemently objected the grant. Hence rejected.

Thereafter the vehicle is operating on the strength of TP issued U/S 87(1) c of MV Act by the RTA from time to time. Last of such TP issued by the RTA dated 25/07/2017 is valid till 18/01/2018. 42

Now the applicant submitted an application for the re issue of a 04 months Temporary permit U/S 87(1) c of MV Act, from the date of expiry of the existing TP. MVI Kottayam reported that no necessity U/S 87(1) c of MV Act.

The vehicle has been conducting service for the past few years, with a settled set of timings.

Judgment dtd 17/10/2017 in WP[c] No 30359/2017 and WA No 993/2017 dtd 15/06/2017 of Division bench of Honorable High Court of Kerala states that no temporary permit U/S 87[1][a], [b] [c] is granted.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant peruse the judgment and take a decision.

43

Item No - 22 G1/121869/2016/K.

Agenda: To consider the application for the reissue of 4months Temporary permit U/S 87(1) c of MV Act in respect of KL-05-W-9444 (Old vehicle KL 05 AA 3471) to operate on the route Village Hall-Kottayam via Ettumanoor, , Ammancherry, Medical College and Gandhinagar, in the vacancy of SC KL 05 410, from the date of expiry of the existing TP.

Applicant - Sri.Tom Augusthy,Alenchery,Athirampuzha PO, Kottayam.

Ref:- Judgment dtd 17/10/2017 in WP[c] No 30359/2017 and WA No 993/2017 dtd 15/06/2017 of Division bench of Honorable High Court of Kerala.

Notes:

S/C.KL 05 410 had conducted service on the Village Hall-Kottayam via Ettumanoor, Athirampuzha, Ammancherry, Medical College and Gandhinagar on the strength of a regular permit.When the permit holder abandoned the route various S/C ‘ s were conducted service on this route on the strength of temporary permits issued U/S 104 of MV act from time to time..

Thereafter application for the re issue of 04 months TP submitted by the applicant rejected by the RTA Kottayam held on 30/05/2013. As per Judgment of Honorable High Court of Kerala in WA No.1943/2012 and 1957 of 2012 dated 23/08/2013, wherein the Division Bench has pointed out that on the basis of Judgment of Honorable Supreme Court in UP State RTC Vs Sanjitha Bhanu & others(2005 KHC1697 & 2005(10) SCC 250),that the private stage carriage operators have no right to claim any grant of stage carriage temporary permits on the notified route or portions thereof. It has ordered that once the scheme is in force and the overlapping is permitted only to a certain extent, it is not possible to grant temporary permit based on the proviso to Section 104 of the MV Act. The benefit of the proviso to section 104 can be granted only in instances where there is no scheme and where no permits have been issued in such route. The proviso to section 104 cannot have any independent application and it is subject to the scheme framed by the Govt. in nationalized routes.

This is an intra district route with a length of 22Kms. Out of which 6 Kms from Kottayam to Gandhinagar and Pravattam to Village Hall 1.5Km, Ammancherry to Medical College 1.5Kms overlaps on Ernakulam-Thekkeady and Kottayam-Neendoor scheme complete exclusion scheme.

Then the vehicle had operated on the strength of 04 months temporary permit issued in compliance to the Judgment of the Honorable HC of Kerala in WPC No.35492/2014 dated 30/12/2014 which is valid till 27/05/2015.There after KL-05-AA-3471 has been operating on the strength of 4 months temporary permit issued U/S 87 (1) c of MV Act by the RTA. Last of such TP issued is valid till 09/01/2018

44

Now the applicant submitted an application for the re issue of a 04 months Temporary permit U/S 87(1) c of MV Act, from the date of expiry of the existing TP. MVI Kottayam reported that no necessity U/S 87(1) c of MV Act.

The vehicle has been conducting service for the past few years, with a settled set of timings.

Judgment dtd 17/10/2017 in WP[c] No 30359/2017 and WA No 993/2017 dtd 15/06/2017 of Division bench of Honorable High Court of Kerala states that no temporary permit U/S 87[1][a], [b] [c] is granted.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant peruse the judgment and take a decision.

45

Item No - 23 G1/14072/2017/K.

Agenda:- 1) To peruse the Order in MP No 690/2017 in MVAA No 203/2017 of Honorable STAT.

2) To consider the application for the issue of Temporary permit 87(1) c of MV Act for 7 days to SC KL 33 H 8818 to operate on the route Kottayam - Via Kanjikuzhy,Puthupally and Thottacadu, in the vacancy of KL-07-AK-5499 (Which was conducting service in the vacancy of KL 05 D 2601) from the date of issue.

Applicant ; Sri Prasad Krishnan, Budhanakuzhiyil, Champakkara PO, Karukachal, Changanacherry

Ref:- Judgment dtd 17/10/2017 in WP[c] No 30359/2017 and WA No 993/2017 dtd 15/06/2017 of Division bench of Honorable High Court of Kerala.

Notes: S/C KL 05 D 2601 was conducted service on the route Kottayam - Karukachal Via Kanjikuzhy, Puthupally and Thottacadu. Since the permit holder abandoned the route SC KL 6 B 8593conducted service in the vacancy of SC KL 05 D 2601 on the strength of 04 months Temporary permit issued U/S 104 of MV Act up to 26/04/2013.

RTA Kottayam held on 16/11/2013 has rejected application in respect of KL-07-AK-5499 submitted for the issue TP U/S 104 of MV Act stating the following reason. “As per Judgment of Honorable High Court of Kerala in WA No.1943/2012 and 1957 of 2012 dated 23/08/2013,wherein the Division Bench has pointed out that on the basis of Judgment of Honorable Supreme Court in UP State RTC Vs Sanjitha Bhanu & others(2005 KHC1697 & 2005(10) SCC 250),that the private stage carriage operators have no right to claim any grant of stage carriage temporary permits on the notified route or portions there of. It has ordered that once the scheme is in force and the overlapping is permitted only to a certain extent, it is not possible to grant temporary permit based on the proviso to Section 104 of the MV Act. The benefit of the proviso to section 104 can be granted only in instances where there is no scheme and where no permits have been issued in such route. The proviso to section 104 cannot have any independent application and it is subject to the scheme framed by the Govt. in nationalized routes”.

This is an intra district route with a length of 26Kms. Out of which 18Kms overlaps on Ernakulam-Thekkeady, Trivandrum - Thekkedy via Ranny and CHRY - CHRY circular scheme. Hence rejected.

Then the SC KL-07-AK-5499 had operated on the strength of a 20 days temporary permit issued in compliance to the Judgment of the Honorable HC of Kerala in WPC No.438/2015 dated 07/01/2015.Thereafter RTA held from time to time granted 4 months TP U/S 87(1)c of MV Act. 46

The application submitted for 4 months temporary permit was placed before the RTA Kottayam held on 02/02/2017 as Item No-15 and taken the following decision.

“Heard learned counsel represented the applicant. Considered the fresh application for the issue of 4 months Temporary Permit U/S 87(1)© of MV Act to SC KL 33 H 8818 to operate on the route Kottayam-Karukachal Via Kanjikuzhy,Puthupally and Thottacadu, in the vacancy of KL-07-AK-5499 (Which was conducting service in the vacancy of KL 05 D 2601) from the date of issue. This is an intra district route with a length of 26Kms. Out of which 18Kms overlaps on Ernakulam-Thekkeady ,Trivandrum-Thekkedy via Ranny and CHRY-CHRY circular scheme. Total overlapping exceeds more than 5% of the total route length violating GO(P) No 42/2009.Hence rejected.”

On 04/07/2017 the applicant produced a Judgment in WPC No 12905 of 2017 dated 11/04/2017 of Honorable High Court of Kerala directing RTA Kottayam to consider his application for 4 months which he had filed on 24/03/2017 in accordance with law within 6 weeks from the date of receipt of the Judgment. RTA has rejected the temporary permit in vide Order No G1/36389/2017/K.dated 25/07/2017.

1) Perused the Judgment in WPC No 12905 of 2017 dated 11/04/2017 of Honable High Court of Kerala 2) Heard learned counsel represented the applicant. Considered the fresh application for the issue of 4 months Temporary Permit U/S 87(1)© of MV Act to SC KL 33 H 8818 to operate on the route Kottayam-Karukachal Via Kanjikuzhy,Puthupally and Thottacadu, in the vacancy of KL-07-AK-5499 (Which was conducting service in the vacancy of KL 05 D 2601) from the date of issue. Perused the file and enquiry report. This is an intra district route with a length of 26Kms. Out of which 18Kms overlaps on Ernakulam - Thekkeady ,Trivandrum-Thekkedy via Ranny and CHRY-CHRY circular scheme. Total overlapping exceeds more than 5% of the total route length violating GO(P) No.8/2017 Trans dated 23/03/2017.Hence rejected. Against the rejection the applicant has produced an Order in MP No 401/2017 in MVAA No 73/2017 of Honorable STAT and obtained two months temporary permit. Last of such two months temporary permit issued was valid till 17/11/2017. Now the R/O of the SC KL-33-H-8818 has produced an Order in MP No 690/2017 in MVAA No 203/2017 of Honorable STAT as follows. “Advanced on application. Learned Standing Counsel for KSRTC opposed granting temporary permit in this case. Initially temporary permit was issued for two months. No counter filed so far. Hence temporary permit is granted for 7 days more. In the meanwhile the respondent shall file objection and matter will be heard on merits and pass orders”. But Judgment dtd 17/10/2017 in WP[c] No 30359/2017 and WA No 993/2017 dtd 15/06/2017 of Division bench of Honorable High Court of Kerala states that no temporary permit U/S 87[1][a], [b] [c] is granted.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant peruse the judgment and take a decision.

47

Item No - 24 G1/11478/2017/K

Agenda - To consider the request of RTA Muvattupuzha for the concurrence for the grant of Renewal of Permit in resp-ect of stage carriage KL-17-K-5796 operating on the route – Ernakulam via, Kanjirappally, , Muvattupuzha and Pattimattom as LSOS.

Ref:-Decision of RTA Muvattupuzha dtd 14/06/2016 ( Item No.03).

Notes:-

RTA, Muvattupuzha has requested concurrence of this RTA for the grant of Renewal of Permit in respect of stage carriage KL-17-K-5796 operating on the route Thulappally – Ernakulam via, Kanjirappally, Thodupuzha, Muvattupuzha and Pattimattom as LSOS.

Enquiry report submitted by the MVI, Kottayam reveals the following.

1. Route length in : 64 kms (Pampavalley to Thonnikkallu [Dist Boarder via, erumely, Kanjirappally, Erattupetta, Kalathukadavu, Melukavumattom]

2, Virgin portion if any :Nil

3, Details of overlapping :2.9 KM.

The route portion from 26th Mile to Kanjirappally Petta Jn. [2.5kms] overlaps on Kottayam – Thekkady scheme and ernakulam – Thekkady scheme. From Erattupetta B.S. to Erattupetta Jn. [400 meter] on Kottayam – Poonjar scheme.

4, Details of width of the road : Not Mentioned in the report by MVI

5, Other relevant Points : Nil.

Hence RTA may peruse the file and take a decision.

48

Item No - 25 G1/8612/2017/K

Agenda - To consider the request of RTA Pathanamthitta for the concurrence for the grant of Fresh Permit in respect of stage carriage KL-07-AK-5499 / a suitable vehicle operating on the route Karukachal – Kadummenchira via, Kavalimukku, Mallappally, Padimon, , , , Kariyamplavu, Kandanperoor, Chettimukku, Ranni, Ozhuvanpara, Mukkalumon, Anjukuzhi, Kakkadumon, Pemaruthi, Athikkayam, Madathamon.

Ref; Proceedings of the RTA Pathanamthitta dtd 30/05/2017.( Item No.03).

Notes:-

RTA, Pathanamthitta has requested concurrence of this RTA for the grant of fresh permit in respect of stage carriage KL-07-AK-5499 / a suitable vehicle operating on the route Karukachal – Kadummenchira via, Kavalimukku, Mallappally, Padimon, Ezhumattoor, Chalappally, Perumpetty, Kariyamplavu, Kandanperoor, Chettimukku, Ranni, Ozhuvanpara, Mukkalumon, Anjukuzhi, Kakkadumon, Pemaruthi, Athikkayam, Madathamon.

Enquiry report submitted by the MVI, Changanacherry reveals the following.

1. Route length in Kottayam District ; 4.4 kms (Karukachal – Panayampala LP School Jn. [2.7 km] and Panayampala LP School Jn. – Kavalimavu 1.7 km)

2, Virgin portion if any :Nil

3, Details of overlapping : 0.2 KM.

The route portion from Karukachal Bus Stand to Karukachal Jn. [0.2 km] objectionably overlaps on Trivandrum – Thekkady via Changanacherry 23861/TB3/66 PW dtd 10/10/1996, and Changanacherry – Changanacherry Circular scheme GO[MS] 146/67/PW dtd 20/07/1967.

4, Details of width of the road : Not Mentioned in the report by MVI

5, Other relevant Points : Nil.

Hence RTA may peruse the file and take a decision.

49

Item No - 26 G1/8287/2017/K

Agenda - To consider the request of RTA Pathanamthitta for the concurrence for the grant of Fresh Permit in respect of stage carriage KL-05-Q-2251 / a suitable vehicle operating on the route – Mallappally via, Kizhakkan Muthoor, Paippadu, Pamalakurisu, Chengaroorchira, Madukkoli.

Ref; Proceedings of the RTA Pathanamthitta dtd 30/05/2017.( Item No.04).

Notes:-

RTA, Pathanamthitta has requested concurrence of this RTA for the grant of fresh permit in respect of stage carriage KL-05-Q-2251 / a suitable vehicle operating on the route Thiruvalla – Mallappally via, Kizhakkan Muthoor, Paippadu, Pamalakurisu, Chengaroorchira, Madukkoli.

Enquiry report submitted by the MVI, Changanacherry reveals the following.

1. Route length in Kottayam District : 1.8 km from Paippadu Fish Market to Keezhadippalam.

2, Virgin portion if any :Nil

3, Details of overlapping : Nil.

4, Details of width of the road : Not Mentioned in the report by MVI

5, Other relevant Points : Nil.

Hence RTA may peruse the file and take a decision.

50

Item No - 27 G1/4076/2017/K

Agenda - To consider the request of RTA Idukki for the concurrence for the Renewal of Permit in respect of stage carriage KL-34-E-951 operating on the route Kuzhitholu – Changanacherry via, 14th Mile, Kumuly, Vandanmedu and Chettukuzhy as LSOS.

Ref; Proceedings of the RTA Idukki dtd 15/02/2017.( Item No.26).

Notes:- RTA, Idukki has requested concurrence of this RTA for the Renewal of permit in respect of stage carriage KL-34-E-951 operating on the route Kuzhitholu – Changanacherry via, 14th Mile, Kumuly, Vandanmedu and Chettukuzhy as LSOS.

Enquiry report submitted by the MVI, Changanacherry reveals the following.

1. Route length in Kottayam District : 54.5 kms (Chanaganacherry to Mundakayam via, 14TH Mile, Ponkunnam, Kanjirappally and 26TH Mile)

2, Virgin portion if any : Nil

3, Details of overlapping : 54.5 KM.

Overlapping Scheme/Notification No Violation if any Whether Distance Objectionable 24 km from Trivandrum – Thekkady via CHRY Yes Yes Changanacherry to 23861/TB3/66PW dtd 10/10/1966 14th Mile and CHRY – CHRY Circular GO[MS] 146/67/PW dtd 20/07/1967 18 km from 14th Trivandrum – Thekkady and CHRY – Yes Yes Mile to 26th Mile CHRY Circular and Kottayam – Thekkady and Ernakulam – Thekkady 26929/TB3/66/PW dtd 12/10/1996 12.5 km from 26th Trivandrum – Thekkady via CHRY Yes Yes Mile to and Kottayam – Thekkady, Mundakayam Ernakulam – Thekkady. Bridge

4, Details of width of the road : CHRY – Kurisummoodu lies in Municipal Limit. Kurisummoodu lies in double lane traffic

5, Other relevant Points : Nil.

Hence RTA may peruse the file and take a decision.

51

Item No - 28 G1/13957/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the request for allowing maximum time for producing the records of a later model vehicle not older than 5 years of its registration, for availing the fresh regular permit granted by the RTA Kottayam on the route Thiruvalla– Mammoodu Via Central Junction, Deepa Junction, Kizhakkan Muthoor, Chumathra, Bethelpady, Paippadu and Venkotta as ordinary service in respect of S/C KL 05 R 4626/another suitable vehicle.

Applicant- Sri. Babu Chacko, Ethakkadu H, Mammoodu P O, Changanacherry.

Ref:- Decision of RTA Kottayam dtd 25/07/2017 in vide Order No G1/147344/2015 K.

Notes:- The RTA Kottayam has granted a fresh regular permit on the route Thiruvalla– Mammoodu Via Central Junction, Deepa Junction, Kizhakkan Muthoor, Chumathra, Bethelpady, Paippadu and Venkotta as ordinary service to S/C KL 05 R 4626/another suitable having same seating capacity or more, which is not older than 05 years from its date of registration, on the above route subject to settlement of timings as per Order No. D3/875/STA dated 08/11/2011. Being the offered vehicle KL 05 R 4626 is older than 5 years from its date of registration, the grantee has requested to allow maximum time to produce a later model vehicle which is not older than 5 years of date of registration for availing the granted regular permit.

Hence the RTA may hear the applicant peruse the file and take a decision.

52

Item No - 29 G1/4354/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the condonation of delay on production of records of a later model vehicle which is not older than 5 years of registration age for availing fresh regular permit granted by the RTA in respect of S/C KL 05 N 1899/ another suitable vehicle on the route Mallappally – Thiruvalla even after obtaining maximum time for producing the records of a later model.

Applicant- Sri. Babu Chacko, Ethakkadu H, Mammoodu P O, Changanacherry.

Ref:-1. Decision of RTA Kottayam dtd 01/09/2016 in vide Order No G1/83664/2015/K. 2.Decision of RTA Kottayam dtd 02/02/2017 in vide Order No G1/608/2017/K

Notes:- Vide reference 1st cited the RTA Kottayam has granted a fresh regular permit on the route Mallappally- Thiruvalla Via , Santhipuram, Kuttickal, Karukachal Jn, Karukachal BS, Santhipuram Ezhumkala, Venkotta, Paippadu, Bethel Pady, Believers Hospital, Kizhakkan Muthoor, Deepa Jn and Traffic Jn. as ordinary service to S/C KL 05 N 1899 / another suitable having same seating capacity or more, which is not older than 05 years from its date of registration, on the above route subject to settlement of timings as per Order No. D3/875/STA dated 08/11/2011. Being the offered vehicle KL 05 N 1899 is older than 5 years from its date of registration, the grantee has requested to allow maximum time to produce a later model vehicle which is not older than 5 years of date of registration for availing the granted regular permit. The RTA Kottayam dtd 02/02/2017 in vide Order No G1/608/2017/K has allowed the maximum time. But the grantee has failed to produce the records of a later model vehicle in time. Now he has requested to condone the delay in submitting records of later model vehicle in time. Now he has produced a later model vehicle KL 39 F 9696 for availing granted regular permit. Meanwhile, the timings of this route was settled for issuing temporary permit.

Hence the RTA may hear the applicant peruse the file and take a decision.

53

Item No - 30 C1/109030/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL33 A 353 on the route ERUMELY- CHANGANASSERRY,Via Korati, Vizhikkathode, Chenappady, Karikkattoor, Manimala, Pathanadu, Karukachal, Mammoodu, Kurisummoodu .

Applicants:-1.Sri.T.V JAMES, ALUMKAL HOUSE, KANGAZHA P.O, CHANGANACHERRY

2. Sri.JOHN MATHEW, VAZHIPLACKAL HOUSE, NEDUMKUNNAM P.O, KOTTAYAM

Notes:-The permit holder of the S/C KL 33 A 353 ,Sri T.V JAMES, ALUMKAL HOUSE, KANGAZHA P.O, CHANGANACHERRY is permitted to operate service on the route ERUMELY- CHANGANASSERRY,Via Korati,Vizhikkathode,Chenappady,Karikkattoor,Manimala,Pathanadu,Karukachal,Mammoodu,

Kurisummoodu with a valid regular permit up to 15/04/2022 [PERMIT NO 5/10012/2002] along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA on 04/11/2017 and found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

54

Item No 31 C1/67586/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect S/C KL 05 V 1069 on the route KOTTAYAM- CHANGANACHERRY Via, Mulankuzha, Pakkil, Chingavanam Anchalkutty, Malakunnam and Kurisummoodu

Applicants:-1.Sri.KC JAMES , KUDAKUTHIYIL HOUSE, PERUNNA P.O, CHANGANACHERRY

2. Sri.M D BAIJU, BAIJU BHAVAN, P.O, CHANGANACHERRY ,KOTTAYAM

Notes:-The permit holder of the S/C KL 05 V 1069 ,Sri.KC JAMES , KUDAKUTHIYIL HOUSE, PERUNNA P.O, CHANGANACHERRY is permitted to operate service on the route, KOTTAYAM- CHANGANACHERRY Via, Mulankuzha, Pakkil , Chingavanam ,Anchalkutty, Malakunnam and Kurisummoodu with a valid regular permit up to 13/05/2018 [PERMIT NO 5/41/1993] along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA on 06/7/2017 and found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

55

Item No - 32 C1/99815//2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect S/C KL 05 T 3083 on the route KALLUMKATHARA – KOTTAYAM Via, Puthenthodu, Pulikuttissery, , Kudayampady, Varissery, and Chungam .

Applicants:-1.Sri.Varghese John, Kallumkathara House, Pulikkuttissery P.O, Aymanam, Kottayam

2. Smt. Elizebeth Kurian, Chereethara house, South P.O, Kottayam

Notes:-The permit holder of the S/C KL 05 T 3083 ,Sri. Varghese John, Kallumkathara House, Pulikkuttissery P.O, Aymanam, Kottayam is permitted to operate service on the route, KALLUMKATHARA – KOTTAYAM Via, Puthenthodu, Pulikuttissery, Aymanam , Kudayampady, Varissery, and Chungam. with a valid regular permit up to 06/11/2018 [PERMIT NO 5/10073/2003] along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA on 06/7/2017 and found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

56

Item No 33 C1/67589/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect S/C KL 33 E 2511 on the route KOTTAYAM- CHANGANACHERRY Via, Akavalavu, Pakkil, Chingavanam, Parekulam, Pathamuttam, , and Kurisummoodu

Applicants:-1.Sri.JAMES KC, KUDAKUTHIYIL HOUSE, KBC ENCLAVES,LAIKKADU, PERUNNA P.O, CHANGANACHERRY

2. Smt. M D BAIJU, BAIJU BHAVAN, VAZHAPPALLY P.O, CHANGANACHERRY ,KOTTAYAM

Notes:-The permit holder of the S/C KL 33 E 2511 ,Sri. JAMES KC, KUDAKUTHIYIL HOUSE, KBC ENCLAVES,LAIKKADU, PERUNNA P.O, CHANGANACHERRY is permitted to operate service on the route, KOTTAYAM- CHANGANACHERRY Via, Akavalavu, Pakkil, Chingavanam, Parekulam, Pathamuttam, Chethipuzha, and Kurisummoodu. with a valid regular permit up to 06/02/2022 [PERMIT NO 5/24/1993] along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA on 20/06/2017 and found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

57

Item No 34 C1/67590/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect S/C KL 05 AA 1264 on the route CHANGANACHERRY- KOTTAYAM Via, Nattakom, Mariyappally, Bormakavala , Mavilangu,Chingavanam, Hoemocollege, Pappanchira, Pathamuttam, Malikakadavu, Chethipuzha,

Applicants:-1.Sri. KC JAMES, KUDAKUTHIYIL HOUSE, KBC ENCLAVES,LAIKKADU, PERUNNA P.O, CHANGANACHERRY

2. Smt. M D BAIJU, BAIJU BHAVAN, VAZHAPPALLY P.O, CHANGANACHERRY ,KOTTAYAM

Notes:-The permit holder of the S/C KL 05 AA 1264 ,Sri. JAMES KC, KUDAKUTHIYIL HOUSE, KBC ENCLAVES,LAIKKADU, PERUNNA P.O, CHANGANACHERRY is permitted to operate service on the route, CHANGANACHERRY- KOTTAYAM Via, Nattakom, Mariyappally, Bormakavala , Mavilangu,Chingavanam, Hoemocollege, Pappanchira, Pathamuttam, Malikakadavu, Chethipuzha with a valid regular permit up to 28/5/2022 [PERMIT NO 5/1015/2005] along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA on 20/06/2017 and found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

58

Item No 35 C1/67590/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect S/C KL 35 A 1232 on the route KUNIJI- KOTTAYAM Via, Ramapuram,Pala, Ayarkunnam, Manarcadu

Applicants:-1.Sri. GOPALAKRISHNAN , THOTTAPPURATHU THEKKETHIL HOUSE, AYARKUNNAM , EAST KOTTAYAM

2. Sri. SIJO MATHEW, VAKKAYIL HOUSE, PADUVA P.O, KOTTAYAM

Notes:-The permit holder of the S/C KL 35 A 1232 , . Sri .GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR, THOTTAPPURATHU THEKKETHIL HOUSE, ,AMAYANNOOR EAST ,AYARKUNNAM KOTTAYAM is permitted to operate service on the route KUNIJI- KOTTAYAM Via, Ramapuram,Pala, Ayarkunnam, Manarcadu, with a valid regular permit up to 08/10/2018 [PERMIT NO 5/130/1998] along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA on 20/10/2017 and found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

59

Item No 36 C1/81432/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL 02 Y 1072 on the route KAINADY-MED. COLLEGE VIA, EARA, KARUNATTUVALA, KURICHY O.P., MANDIRAM, CHINGAVANAM, BUKKANA, NATTAKOM PANCHAYATH OFFICE, MARIAPPALLY, KOTTAYAM AND .

Applicants:-1. K J VARGHESE [POSSESSOR], KANIYAMPARAMBIL [H], VENGAL, ALUMTHURUTHY P O, THIRUVALLA

2.VISHNU K R, KUNNATHU HOUSE, P.O, KOTTAYAM

Notes:-The permit holder of the S/C KL 02 Y 1072 , . K J VARGHESE [POSSESSOR], KANIYAMPARAMBIL [H], VENGAL, ALUMTHURUTHY P O, THIRUVALLA is permitted to operate service on the route KAINADY-MED. COLLEGE, VIA, EARA, KARUNATTUVALA, KURICHY O.P., MANDIRAM, CHINGAVANAM, BUKKANA, NATTAKOM PANCHAYATH OFFICE, MARIAPPALLY, KOTTAYAM AND KUMARANALLOOR with a valid regular permit up to 10/07/2020 [PERMIT NO 5/1064/2005] along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA on 21/10/2017and found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

60

Item No 37 C1/67583/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL 33 E 2504 on the,route CHANGANACHERRY – KOTTAYAM VIA , CHETHIPUZHA, KURICHY, HOMEO COLLEGE, CHINGAVANAM, MAVILANGU, BUKKANA, SCHOOL, PALLAM, NATTAKOM, & MANIPUZHA

Applicants:-1.Sri. K C JAMES, KUDAKUTHIYIL HOUSE, KBC ENCLAVES,LAIKKADU, PERINNAI P.O, CHANGANACHERRY

2.Sri.M.D.BAIJU,BAIJUBHAVAN, VAZHAPPALLY P.O,CHANGANACHERRY

Notes:-The permit holder of the S/C KL 33 E 2504 , Sri. K C JAMES, KUDAKUTHIYIL HOUSE, KBC ENCLAVES,LAIKKADU, PERINNAI P.O, CHANGANACHERRY is permitted to operate service on the routeCHANGANACHERRY-KOTTAYAM,VIA , CHETHIPUZHA,KURICHY,HOMEO COLLEGE,CHINGAVANAM,MAVILANGU,BUKKANA,SCHOOL,PALLAM,NATTAKOM,& MANIPUZHA with a valid regular permit up to 14/10/2018[PERMIT NO 5/10106/1998] along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA on 10/08/2017and found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

61

Item No 38 C1/74308/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL 33 D 959 on the route KOTTAYAM-VADASSERIKKARA

Applicants:-1. Sri. PRAKASH T JOHN, THONDANKULANGARA, KADAYANICADU P.O, CHNGANACHERRY

2.Sri. P.T ANIYANKUNJU, PUTHUVEETIL HOUSE, COLLECTORATE P.O, KOTTAYAM

Notes:-The permit holder of the S/C KL 33 D 959 , Sri PRAKASH T JOHN, THONDANKULANGARA, KADAYANICADU P.O,CHNGANACHERRY is permitted to operate service on the route KOTTAYAM-VADASSERIKKARA with a valid regular permit up to 15/01/2018[PERMIT NO 5/10018/1999] along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA on 30/06/2017and found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

62

Item No. 39 C1/117436&117439/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permits in respect of S/C KL 35 E 1647 ERNAKULAM - MUNDAKAYAM

Applicants:-1.Smt. JESSY JOY, KAVALAKKATTU HOUSE,EZHACHERRY P.O,KOTTAYAM

2.MOHANANNAIR, RANDANITHADATHILHOUSE, ELACKADU P.O, KOTTAYAM

Notes:-The permit holder and possessor of the leased stagecarriage KL 35 E 1647 , Smt.Jessy joy, Kavalakkattu House,Ezhacherry PO, Kottayam. is permitted to operate service on the route ERNAKULAM - MUNDAKAYAM with a a valid regular permit up to 20/10/2020 [PERMIT NO 5/ 101010/2003] along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA on 3/11/2017 found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

63

Item No 40 C1/109030/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL 06 C 988 on the route Karipputhattu bridge - Kottayam via Manalel Church, Karippayil ,Chappel Jn,Panampalam,Medical College and Gandhinagar [town service]

Applicants:-1.Sri. Vincent Domanic, Chavara House, P.O, Kottayam

2. Sri.Subhash, K .M Vidhyadharan, Mangalasserikariyil house, P.O, Arpookara

Notes:-The permit holder of the S/C KL 06 C 988, Vincent Domanic, Chavara House, Villoonni P.O, Kottayam is permitted to operate service on the route Karipputhattu bridge -Kottayam via Manalel Church,karippayil ,Chappel Jn,Panampalam,Medical College and Gandhinagar [town service with a valid regular permit up to 21/03/2020 [PERMIT NO 5/1047/1995] along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA on 02/08/2017 and found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

64

Item No 41 C1/109030/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL 05 AA 3154 on the route PONKUNNAM-ERATTUPETTA Via Thampalakkadu, Kanjirappally, Kalaketty ,and Thidanadu

1.Applicants:-1.Sri. Abdul Salam[Possessor], Thenammackal house, Kanjirappally P.O, Kottayam

2.Applicant2.Sri. Biju Thomas, Vazhakkalayil house, Kanjikuzhy, Kottayam

Notes:-The permit holder of the S/C KL 05 AA 3154,Sri. Abdul Salam[Possessor], Thenammackal house, Kanjirappally P.O, Kottayam is permitted to operate on the route PONKUNNAM- ERATTUPETTA Via Thampalakkadu, Kanjirappally, Kalaketty ,and Thidanad with a valid regular permit up to 30/06/2019 [PERMIT NO 5/78/1999] along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA on 14/07/2017 and found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

65

Item No 42 C1/109030/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL 05 N 2080 on the route KAINADY- KOTTAYAM

1.Applicants:-1.Sri.Rajeev S Nair, , Thrikkothamangalam , Changanacherry

2.Applicant 2.Sri. Saju Thomas, Neduvoppil house, Eara P.O, Neelamperoor

Notes:-The permit holder of the S/C KL 05 N 2080, Sri. Rajeev S Nair, Vallamkulam, Thrikkothamangalam , Changanacherry Kottayam is permitted to operate on the route KAINADY- KOTTAYAM with a valid regular permit up to 22/12/2017 [PERMIT NO5/1068/2005] along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA on 21/11/2017 and found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

66

Item No. 43 C1/125321&81980/2017/K

Agenda:1.To peruse the Judgment in WP[C] No 24264 of 2017 dtd 27/7/2017 2.To consider the delay condonation application for filing the transfer of permit death 3. To consider the application for transfer of permit [Death] in respect of S/C KL 07 AH 2808 on the route KIDANGOOR –VECHOOR 4.To consider the application for replacement of vehicle

Applicant: Sri. Santhosh S/O Smt Ramani Nadarajan, Olanikkal house, Ayyappankovil P.O,Idukki dtd 15/07/2017 Notes:- Stage carriage KL 07 AH 2808 has a valid regular permit up to 03/10/2018 on the route KIDANGOOR –VECHOOR Via Pala, Marangattupally, Kuravilangadu, Kuruppanthara, Kaduthuruthy, Thalayolaparambu,and Vaikom as ordinary service .The permit holder Smt Remani Nadarajan, Olanikkal house, Ayyappankovil P.O,Idukki was expired on 31/07/2014 and the death was not intimated in this office in time. An application for transfer of ownership [ death] submitted on 15/7/2017 by Sri. Santhosh , the successor of the vehicle with request to condone the delay .On 09/11/2017, Sri. Santhosh ,S/O Smt Ramani Nadarajan ,Olanikkal house, Ayyappankovil P.O,Idukki has applied for a transfer of permit death in respect of S/C KL 07 AH 2808.He has Produced family membership certificate issued by the village officer Ayyappankovil Taluk. Meanwhile a Judgment in WP[C] No 24264 of 2017 dtd 27/7/2017 has been produced by the applicant which directed to consider the application in accordance with law , taking note of any reliable document available with respect to the transfer sought for the true copy of the letters of consent submitted by the other legal heirs agreeing to transfer the vehicle in the name of the petitioner ,if required after issuing notice to the petitioner and all concerned persons and attain finality to the same within 6 weeks from the date of receipt of this judgment .Also make it clear that the judgment rendered by this court in Bhagyalakshmi vs RTA Palakkadu [2010[2] klt 431] shall also be taken into consideration .ie, “ the person seeking such transfer of permit would have to satisfy the authority that he had legally succeeded to the possession of the vehicle by producing supporting documents “

Hence all of them were heard by the Secretary RTA Kottayam on 15/11/2017. Among them the legal heir Sri Nadarajan was deceased on 03/11/2015 and the death certificate produced . All others are given consent to transfer the permit to the name of Sri. Santhosh.Also the genuiness of the application was enquired through the field officer and reported that the application was genuine one.

Even though the regular permit valid up to 03/10/2018 the registration validity expired on 01/02/2017. Along with the transfer of permit [death] application the applicant submitted application for replacement of vehicle by KL 04 N 3641 .It is a leased higher model vehicle[2003] Signed lease agreement and other valid documents also submitted.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant and take a decision 67

Item No 44 C2/83971/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of leased S/C KL 05 Y 5247 Maniyamparambu - Kottayam from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd

Applicants:- 1. Sri. Sunilkumar, Puthenparambil house, Arpookkara West P O, Kottayam 2. Sri. Sujeesh, Mangalasserikkal house, Karippoothattu, Arppokkara, Kottayam Notes:-

The permit holder of leased S/C KL 05 Y 5247 Sri Sunilkumar, Puthenparambil house,Arpookkara West P O, Kottayam permitted to operate service on the route Maniyamparambu - Kottayam with a valid regular permit up to 29/12/2018 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA and on equiry, it is found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

68

Item No 45 C2/105750/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL 18 C 4797 Vazhamana - Kaippuzhamuttu from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd

Applicants:- 1. Sri. K V Paulose, Kunneparambu, P O, Vaikom 2. Sri.Thomas M T, Malayil house, P O, Vaikom Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL 18 C 4797 Sri K V Paulose, Kunneparambu, Chempu P O, Vaikom permitted to operate service on the route Vazhamana - Kaippuzhamuttu with a valid regular permit up to 23/03/2022 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA and on equiry, it is found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

69

Item No 46 C2/155174/2015/K

Agenda: To consider the application for condonation of delay in effecting transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL 05 Y 5099 on the route Kodungoor – Pala from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd .

Ref:- Decision of RTA, Dated 01/09/2016

Applicants:- 1. Sri. Vinod, Arackaparambil house, Bharananganam, , Pala 2. Sri.Jince Joseph, Thayyil house, , Erattupetta, Pala.

As per the reference cited above, the following decision was taken by RTA, Kottayam at its sitting on 01/09/2016.

“Heard The learned counsel represented the transferor and the transferee. Transfer of permit in respect of the Stage Carriage KL 05 Y 5099 on the Kodungoor Pala is allowed as applied for, subject to clearance of all government dues,if any.”

The applicants were failed to produce current records of the S/c KL 05 Y 5099 in time. The Secretary, RTA,Kottayam had heard both the applicants on 18/08/2017. The permit holder informed that the production of current records were delayed due to the delay to obtain the clearance certificate from KMTWWF Board. He also requested to condone the delay to produce the current records of the vehicle and effect transfer of permit as per the earlier decision of RTA in this matter.

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

70

Item No 47 C2/107362/2017

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL 05 P 8984 [ Now replaced as KL 34 E 5518 under lease agreement] Ummikuppa -Edamury from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd

Applicants:- 1. Sri. P P Latheef, Payyampallil house, Erumely, Kanjirappally 2. Sri.Rasheeda,W/o Salahudheen, Meprathu house, Mukkada, Manimala Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL 05 P 8984 [ Now replaced as KL 34 E 5518 under lease agreement]Sri P P Latheeph, Payyampallil house, Erumely permitted to operate service on the route Ummikuppa -Edamury with a valid regular permit up to 17/09/2021 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA and on equiry, it is found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

71

Item No 48 C2/ 80741/2017

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of leased S/C KL 35 E 5629 Kottayam - Pala from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd

Applicants:- 1. Sri. Mathukutty John, Kothaniyil house, Kothala P O, Kottayam 2. Sri.Sabu C Kurian, Chanakaparayckal house, Kothala P O, Kooroppada, Pampady. Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C leased KL 35 E 5629 Sri. Mathukutty John, Kothaniyil house, Kothala P O, Kottayam permitted to operate service on the route Kottayam - Pala with a valid regular permit up to 24/10/2021 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA and on equiry, it is found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

72

Item No 49 C2/ 124473/2017

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL 05 N 5728 Pallikadavu - from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd

Applicants:- 1. Sri. Shino P Raju, Chennakkattu house, Iravinallur P O, Puthuppally,Kottayam 2. Sri.Manju Anandakuttan, Kariyil house, North P O, Kumarakom Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL 05 N 5728 Sri. Shino P Raju, Chennakkattu house, Iravinallur P O, Puthuppally,Kottayam permitted to operate service on the route Pallikadavu - Cherthala with a valid regular permit up to 14/10/2018 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA and on equiry, it is found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

73

Item No 50 C2/ 124128/2017

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL 05 AF 5768 Manaleppalli – Changanacherry from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd

Applicants:- 1. Sri. K R Gopidas, Kuttiyel house, P O, Athirampuzha 2. Sri.Sreejithkumar K G, Kuttiyel house, Sreekandamangalam P O, Athirampuzha Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL 05 AF 5768, Sri. K R Gopidas, Kuttiyel house, Sreekandamangalam P O, Athirampuzha permitted to operate service on the route Manaleppalli – Changanacherry with a valid regular permit up to 20/05/2019 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA and on equiry, it is found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

74

Item No 51 C2/ 82300/2017

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL 38 F 4729 Ernakulam - Kottayam from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd

Applicants:- 1. Sri. Subair K A, Kunnel house, Edavetty P O, Thodupuzha 2. Smt. Dhanya, Ariyappurathu house, Periyappuram, Ernakulam Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL 38 F 4729 Sri. Subair K A, Kunnel house, Edavetty P O, Thodupuzha permitted to operate service on the route Ernakulam - Kottayam with a valid regular permit up to 27/04/2021 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA and on equiry, it is found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

75

Item No 52 C2/ 82294/2017

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL 38 F 4755 Ernakulam Kaloor B S - Kottayam from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd

Applicants:- 1. Sri. Bijoy Mathew, Vattakkuzhiyil house, Vengalloor P O, Thodupuzha 2. Smt. Dhanya, Ariyappurathu house, Periyappuram, Ernakulam Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL 38 F 4755 Sri. Bijoy Mathew, Vattakkuzhiyil house, Vengalloor P O, Thodupuzha permitted to operate service on the route Ernakulam Kaloor B S - Kottayam with a valid regular permit up to 08/06/2019 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA and on equiry, it is found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

76

Item No 53 C2/ 119582/2017

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL 05 R 4626 Ponganthanam - Thiruvalla from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd

Applicants:- 1. Sri. Babu Chacko, Ethakadu house, Mammood P O, Changanacherry 2. Sri. Martin Joseph, Padiyara Martin Villa, I E Nagar P O, Changanacherry Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL 05 R 4626 Sri. Babu Chacko, Ethakadu house, Mammood P O, Changanacherry permitted to operate service on the route Ponganthanam - Thiruvalla with a valid regular permit up to 09/11/2019 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA and on equiry, it is found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

77

Item No 54 C2/ 92425/2017

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of leased S/C KL 05 X 5000 Puthuppally - Ettumanoor from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd

Applicants:- 1. Sri. Libu K Lukose, Kattuveettil Libuvilla, Neerikkad P O, Ayarakkunnam 2. Sri. Sajamon, Kunnumpurathu house, Koorappada P O, Pampady Notes:-

The permit holder of leased S/C KL 05 X 5000 Sri. Libu K Lukose, Kattuveettil Libuvilla, Neerikkad P O, Ayarakkunnam permitted to operate service on the route Puthuppally - Ettumanoor with a valid regular permit up to 29/12/2017 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA and on equiry, it is found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

78

Item No. 55 C2/ 89564/2015

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of leased S/C KL 05 AL 6487 Ezhumamthuruth - Kottayam from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd

Applicants:- 1. Sri. George Joseph, Plavuvachathil Kumbanayil house, Kothanalloor P O, Kottayam 2. Sri. Sojin T George, Thuruthel Mattathil House, Sreekandamangalam P O, Athirampuzha Notes:-

The permit holder of leased S/C KL 05 AL 6487 Sri. George Joseph, Plavuvachathil Kumbanayil house, Kothanalloor P O, Kottayam permitted to operate service on the route Ezhumamthuruth - Kottayam with a valid regular permit up to 25/02/2019 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA on 16/08/2017 and on equiry, it is found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

79

Item No 56 C2/ 104747/2017

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL 06 C 4464 Kodungoor - Pala from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd

Applicants:- 1. Sri. Rajan P K, S/o P M Kassimpillai, Panackal house, Vazhoor East , Kottayam 2. Sri. Savio Michael, Thokkanadu house, , Kottayam Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL 06 C 4464 Sri. Rajan P K, S/o P M Kassimpillai, Panackal house, Vazhoor East , Kottayam permitted to operate service on the route Kodungoor - Pala with a valid regular permit up to 27/05/2020 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA and on equiry, it is found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

80

Item No 57 C2/ 93061/2017

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of leased S/C KL 09 P 9530 [ Now replaced as KL 05 AM 4311] Kottayam - Pala from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd

Applicants:- 1. Sri. Subhash, Subhash Sadanam, Vattukulam P O,Kadappoor , Pala 2. Sri. Thomas Mathew, Pathiyil house,Koodalloor P O, Kidangoor Notes:-

The permit holder of leased S/C KL 09 P 9530 [ Now replaced as KL 05 AM 4311]Sri Subhash, Subhash Sadanam, Vattukulam P O,Kadappoor , Pala permitted to operate service on the route Kottayam - Pala with a valid regular permit up to 13/02/2020 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA on 15/08/2017 and on equiry, it is found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

81

Item No 58 C2/ 126605/2017

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL 05 S 6026 Mammood - Kottayam from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd

Applicants:- 1. Sri. Sabu C V, Choorakuttiyil house, Mammoodu P O, Madappally, , Changanacherry 2. Smt. Jameela Sabu, W/o Sabu, Puthuparambil house, Madappally, Kottayam

Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL 05 S 6026 Sri. Sabu C V, Choorakuttiyil house, Mammoodu P O, Madappally, Perumpanachy, Changanacherry permitted to operate service on the route Mammood - Kottayam with a valid regular permit up to 10/01/2020 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA on 13/11/2017 and on equiry, it is found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

82

Item No. 59 C2/ 126278/2017

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL 05 W 5003 Chanaganacherry - Kottayam from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd

Applicants:- 1. Smt. Leelamma Sunny, Kondodickal house, Umbidi P O, , Changanacherry 2. Smt. Jameela Sabu, W/o Sabu, Puthuparambil house, Madappally, Kottayam Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL 05 W 5003 Smt. Leelamma Sunny, Kondodickal house, Umbidi P O, Vakathanam, Changanacherry permitted to operate service on the route Changanacherry - Kottayam with a valid regular permit up to 30/11/2021 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA on 13/11/2017 and on equiry, it is found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

83

Item No. 60 C2/ 54524/2017

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL 34 C 6646 - Kanjirappally from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd

Applicants:- 1. Sri. Sajan Jose, Vazhayil house, Edamattom, Vilangupara , Pala 2. Sri. Stave Lukose, Vallyasserikattil house, Onamthuruth P O, Kottayam Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL 34 C 6646 Sri. Sajan Jose, Vazhayil house, Edamattom, Vilangupara , Pala permitted to operate service on the route Perunilam - Kanjirappally with a valid regular permit up to 26/03/2022 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA on 21/06/2017 and on equiry, it is found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

84

Item No 61 C2/123724/2017

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of leased S/C KL 67 A 5971 Pala - Koothattukulam from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd

Applicants:- 1. Sri. Jaise Kuriakose, Kanjirapparayil house, Uzhavoor P O, Kottayam 2. Sri. Mananging Director, Akasala Travel and Event Manangement Pvt Ltd, Uzhavoor P O, Kottayam. Notes:-

The permit holder of leased S/C KL 67 A 5971 Sri. Jaise Kuriakose, Kanjirapparayil house, Uzhavoor P O, Kottayam permitted to operate service on the route Pala - Koothattukulam with a valid regular permit up to 15/09/2018 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA on 09/11/2017 and on equiry, it is found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

85

Item No. 62 C2/123721/2017

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of leased S/C KL 67 A 6065 Pala - Koothattukulam from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd

Applicants:- 1. Sri. Jaise Kuriakose, Kanjirapparayil house, Uzhavoor P O, Kottayam 2. Sri. Mananging Director, Akasala Travel and Event Manangement Pvt Ltd, Uzhavoor P O, Kottayam. Notes:-

The permit holder of leased S/C KL 67 A 6065 Sri. Jaise Kuriakose, Kanjirapparayil house, Uzhavoor P O, Kottayam permitted to operate service on the route Pala - Koothattukulam with a valid regular permit up to 09/10/2016 [T P Valid upto 23/03/2018] along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. Both the applicants were heard by the secretary RTA on 09/11/2017 and on equiry, it is found that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

86

Item No. 63 C2/7359/2017

Agenda:- 1. To peruse the judgment in WP[c] No.27839/2017 of Honourable High Court of Kerala. 2. To consider the application for transfer of permit [death] in respect of S/C KL 34 D 6274 on the route Pala – Elamkadu.

Applicant:- Smt. Brijit K A, Kandathiparambil house, Rosapookandom, P O, Idukki.

Notes:-

S/C KL 34 D 6274 conducts service on the route Pala – Elamkadu with a valid regular permit upto 02/12/2019. The permit holder of the S/c KL 34 D 6274, Sri.Thomas Chacko, Kollamparambil house, Koottickal, Yendayar P O, Kanjirappally, expired on 12/04/2017. The permit holder’s wife Betsy Thomas expired on 28/11/2015 and his mother Valsamma Chacko expired on 12/04/2017.

As per the certificate issued by the village officer, Koottikkal, dated 05/06/2017 , the legal heir of the deceased person,Thomas Chacko, is as follows.

Sl No. Name Relationship Age 1. Anna Selin Thomas Daughter 08

Smt. Brijit K A, maternal grand mother of Anna Selin Thomas, intimated that the S/C KL 34 D 6274 is under her possession and also requested to transfer the permit of the vehicle in her name since the legal heir of the deceased permit holder is a minor girl. She was appeared for personal hearing on 04/07/2017. This authority has directed to the applicant to stop the service of the vehicle with effect from 12/07/2017 in accordance with the sub rule [1] of Rule 56 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 .

Later, The applicant produced an interim order in I.A No.1313/17 in O.P [G&W] No.63/17 of The Additional District Judge-V, Kottayam. The interim order as follows

“ Heard, perused the affidavit, taking note of the prayer in the petition, I am of considered view that it is highly necessary to permit the petitioner to look after the affairs of the stage carriages. This would in the best interest of the minor. Therefore I allowed the petition and permit the petitioner to look after the permit of the stage carriages bearing No.KL 34 A 5741 and KL 34 D 6274 until further orders.”

87

Smt. Brigit Thomas [Possessor] submitted an application for temporary permit to the S/c KL 34 D 6274 on the route Pala – Elamkadu and granted T P vide Order No.82012/2017, dated 17/07/2017. But the applicant had not submitted the current records of the vehicle . A communication, vide Letter No.C2/7359/2017/K, Dated 05/08/17, was sent to the applicant to produce the current records of the vehicle within 7 days from the date of receipt of the letter , failing which the sanction for the issue of temporary permit is liable to be revoked with out further notice . She approached before the Honorable High Court of Kerala against this communication [Ext. P7] and prayed to quash order of the Secretary, RTA, to produce the current records of the vehicle to issue temporary permit and give a direction to the Secretary, RTA, not to interfere with the smooth service of the stage carriage on the strength of the regular permit on the route Pala – Elamkadu. The Honourable Court has delivered its judgment in WP[C] 27839/17 as follows.

“ Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, and hearing learned cousel for the petitioner and learned Sernior Government Pleader, I think the writ petition can be disposed of with suitable directions.

Therefore there will be a direction to the respondent [Secretary, RTA] to place all the current records of the vehicle bearing registration No.KL 34 D 6274 before the RTA, Kottayam, who shall take a decision in the matter at the earliest possible time, and at any rate, within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Till such time the interim order passed by this Court 23/08/17 will be in force.[ a stay of further proceedings pertaining to Ext.P7] “

The current records of the vehicle KL 34 D 6274 was produced by Smt. Brijith.

Hence the RTA may hear the applicant, peruse the records and take a decision.

88

Item No. 64 C3/80941/2017

Agenda:- 1. To peruse the judgment in WP[c] No.24433/2017 of Honourable High Court of Kerala. 2. To consider the application for transfer of permit [death] in respect of S/Cs KL 05 AD 6905 [Karukachal – Nattakom Guest House], KL 05 AM 2296 [Kottayam – Pallickathodu],KL 05 AH 5760 [Mundakkayam – Kottayam], KL 05 AK 4279 [Thulappally – Kottayam], KL 05 AN 7902 [Naranamthodu – Kottayam].

Applicant:- Jinu Oommen Kurian, S/o Babu M Kurian, Mupparathara house, P O, Kottayam

Notes:-

The permit holder of the following Stage Carriages Sri. Babu M Kurian, Mupparathara house, Thiruvarppu P O, Kottayam expired on 02/06/2017.

Sl Reg. No. Route Regular T P issued to Possessor of the No. permit vehicle valid upto upto 1. KL 05 AD 6905 Karukachal – 03/07/2021 01/01/2018 Nattakom Guest House 2 KL 05 AM 2296 Kottayam – 31/03/2022 02/01/2018 Pallickathodu 3 KL 05 AH 5760 Mundakkayam – 18/12/2020 01/01/2018 Kottayam 4 KL 05 AK 4279 Thulappally – 30/06/2021 01/01/2018 Kottayam 5 KL 05 AN 7902 Naranamthodu – 01/05/2020 02/01/2018 Kottayam

The death was informed in time. On 13/07/2016, Sri. Jinu Oommen Kurian, S/o Babu M Kurian, Mupparathara house, Thiruvarppu P O, Kottayam has applied for transfer of permit in respect of the above stage carriages.All the family members of the deceased permit holder were appeared for personal hearing before the Secretary, RTA on 19/07/2017. At the time of hearing , Produced family membership certificate issued by the Village Officer, Thiruvarppu, death certificate of the permit holder, ‘Will’ of the permit holder and the notarised affidavit in which the other family members states that they have no objection to transfer the permit in favour of the applicant.

89

As per the certificate issued by the village officer, Thiruvarppu, dated 11/07/2017, the members of the family of the deceased person, Babu M Kurian, are as follows.

Sl No. Name Relationship Age 1 Jomini Babu Wife 61 2 Jinsu Umman Mariam Daughter 31 3 Jinu Ummar Kurian Son 29

The applicant was approached before the Honourable High Court of Kerala for a direction to the Secretary, RTA, not to insist for legal heirship certificate in order to transfer the ownership of the vehicles. The Honourable High Court of Kerala in WP[c] No.24433/2017 has ordered as follows.

“Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Senior Government Pleader, there will be a direction to the respondent to consider Ext.P5 [ Application in Form 31] series of applications taking note of the documents produced along with the same and the proposition of law laid down by this court in Ext.P8 judgment [2010 [2] KLT 431 Bhagyalakshmi Vs. RTA,Palakad , WP[c] No.12831/2010] which shall be taken , within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after providing notice of hearing to the petitioner and the legal heirs.”

Hence the RTA may hear the applicant, peruse the records and take a decision.

90

Item No. 65 C3/62538/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL-05-AQ-8668 on the route Pala – Kottayam from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd applicant.

Applicants:- 1.Sri.Bijo Jose, Chethalil[H],Koodalloor.P.O,Kottayam 2. Sri.George Varghese,Vadasseril[H],Kattachira.P.O,Kottayam

Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL-05-AQ-8668 Sri. Bijo Jose permitted to operate stage carriage service on the route Pala – Kottayam with valid regular permit up to 20/11/2019 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. The matter was enquired through MVI, Kottayam. The applicants appeared before Secretary RTA , Kottayam on 13/10/2017 and revealed that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

91

Item No 66 C3/24644/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL-38-C-8866 on the route – Kottayam from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd applicant.

Applicants:-1.Sri.Unnikrishnannayar,Lakshmi Vihar, Champakkara, Karukachal

2.Sri.Varughese.V.M,Mullenkuzhiyil[H],Narakathani.P.O, Mallappally,Pathanamthitta.

Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL-38-C-8866 Sri. Sri.Unnikrishnannayar permitted to operate stage carriage service on the route Kozhencherry – Kottayam with valid regular permit up to 22/02/2019 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. The matter was enquired through MVI, Kottayam. The applicants appeared before Secretary RTA , Kottayam on 23/02/2017 and revealed that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

92

Item No 67 C3/118106/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL-35-G-8985 on the route Kottayam- Pala from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd applicant.

Applicants:-1.Sri.Ajith Lukose,Puthenkalayil[H],Kanakkari.P.O,Kottayam

2.Sri.Harishkumar.T.H,Thuruthiyil[H],Kidangoor South.P.O

Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL-35-G-8985 Sri. Ajith Lukose permitted to operate stage carriage service on the route Kottayam - Pala with valid regular permit up to 24/11/2019 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. The matter was enquired through MVI, Kottayam. The applicants appeared before Secretary RTA , Kottayam on 24/10/2017 and revealed that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

93

Item No 68 C3/116742/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL-05-AB-8400 on the route Kottayam- Pala from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd applicant.

Applicants:-1.Sri.V.T.Mathew,Beena Bhavan,Chelliozhukam Road,Kottayam

2.Sri.Biju Mathew, Beena Bhavan,Chelliozhukam Road,Kottayam

Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL-05-AB-8400 Sri. V.T.Mathew permitted to operate stage carriage service on the route Kottayam - Pala with valid regular permit up to 31/08/2021 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. The matter was enquired through MVI, Kottayam. The applicants appeared before Secretary RTA , Kottayam on 02/11/2017 and revealed that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

94

Item No 69 C3/68663/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL-33-C-9189 on the route Kottayam- Changanacherry from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd applicant.

Applicants:-1.Sri.K.C.James,Kudakuthiyil[H],Perunna.P.O,Changanacherry

2.Sri.M.D.Baiju, Baiju Bhavan,Vazhappally.P.O,Changanacherry Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL-33-C-9189 Sri. K.C.James permitted to operate stage carriage service on the route Kottayam - Changanacherry with valid regular permit up to 14/04/2022 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. The matter was enquired through MVI, Changanacherry. The applicants appeared before Secretary RTA , Kottayam on 06/07/2017 and revealed that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

95

Item No 70 C3/54531/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL-34-7879 on the route Erattupetta- Chenappadi from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd applicant.

Applicants:-1.Sri.Abdul Salam,Thenammakkal[H],Kanjirappally.P.O

2.Sri.Nijo Shaji,Attel House,Athirumpuzha.P.O,Kottayam Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL-34-7879 Sri.Abdul Salam permitted to operate stage carriage service on the route Erattupetta- Chenappadi with valid regular permit up to 12/09/2018 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. The matter was enquired through MVI, Kottayam. The applicants appeared before Secretary RTA , Kottayam on 22/06/2017 and revealed that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

96

Item No 71 C3/54528/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL-05-X-9202 on the route Erattupetta- Kanjirappally from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd applicant.

Applicants:-1.Sri.George Varghese,Vadasseril[H],Vettimukal.P.O,Ettumanoor

2.Sri.Steave Lukose,Vallisserikattil[H], Thuruthu,Kottayam Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL-05-X-9202 Sri.George Varghese permitted to operate stage carriage service on the route Erattupetta- Kanjirappally with valid regular permit up to 02/01/2019 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. The matter was enquired through MVI, Kottayam. The applicants appeared before Secretary RTA , Kottayam on 22/06/2017 and revealed that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

97

Item No 72 C3/29482/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL-35-A-8721 on the route Pala- Ponkunnam from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd applicant.

Applicants:-1.Sri.Sanjeev Mathew,Kalapurackal[H],Vilakummaruth,

2.Sri.Vinod Kumar.K.P,Arackaparambil[H],Idamattam.P.O,Kottayam Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL-35-A-8721 Sri.Sanjeev Mathew permitted to operate stage carriage service on the route Pala- Ponkunnam with valid regular permit up to 18/08/2021 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. The matter was enquired through MVI, Kottayam. The applicants appeared before Secretary RTA , Kottayam on 13/11/2017 and revealed that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

98

Item No 73 C3/29482/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL-17-E-7884 on the route Ranni- Vattakkavu from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd applicant.

Applicants:-1.Sri.Thomas,Kizhakkevattaparampil[H],Erumely Town,Kottayam

2.Sri.Johnykutty Thomas,Urumpil[H],Kannimala.P.O,Kottayam Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL-17-E-7884 Sri.Thomas permitted to operate stage carriage service on the route Ranni- Vattakkavu with valid regular permit up to 16/02/2019 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. The matter was enquired through MVI, Kottayam. The applicants appeared before Secretary RTA, Kottayam on 28/09/2017 and revealed that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

99

Item No 74 C3/107199/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL-34-7395 on the route Thulappally - Kanjirappally from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd applicant.

Applicants:-1.Smt.Thressiamma Jacob,Kaniyamparambil[H],Muttappally

2. Sri.Shibu, Kaniyamparambil[H],Muttappally,Erumely

Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL-34-7395 Smt.Thressiamma permitted to operate stage carriage service on the route Thulappally - Kanjirappally with valid regular permit up to 13/03/2021 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. The matter was enquired through MVI, Kottayam. The applicants appeared before Secretary RTA , Kottayam on 23/09/2017 and revealed that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

100

Item No 75 C3/98254/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL-53-D-7963 on the route Erattupetta - Manimala from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd applicant.

Applicants:-1.Sri.Anas.T.A,Thenammackal[H],Kanjikuzhy,Kottayam

2. Sri.Abdul Salam,Thenammackal[H],Kanjikuzhy,Kottayam

Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL-53-D-7963 Sri.Anas.T.A permitted to operate stage carriage service on the route Erattupetta - Manimala with valid regular permit up to 05/08/2021 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. The matter was enquired through MVI, Kottayam. The applicants appeared before Secretary RTA , Kottayam on 04/10/2017 and revealed that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

101

Item No 76 C3/78334/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL-33-8159 on the route Ponkunnam - Changanacherry from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd applicant.

Applicants:-1.Sri.Sony Kurian,Pullamkalam,Mammood.P.O,Kottayam

2. Sri.John Mathew,Vazhiplackal[H],Nedumkunnam.P.O

Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL-33-8159 Sri.Sony Kurian permitted to operate stage carriage service on the route Ponkunnam - Changanacherry with valid regular permit up to 28/04/2022 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. The matter was enquired through MVI, Kottayam. The applicants appeared before Secretary RTA , Kottayam on 12/07/2017 and revealed that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

102

Item No 77 C3/123026/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL-05-W-9273 on the route Pampady – Ponkunnam from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd applicant.

Applicants:-1.Sri.Babu Joseph,Madappattu[H],Elampally.P.O,Kottayam

2. Sri. Dileep,Challolil[H],Anickadu.P.O,Kottayam

Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL-05-W-9273 Sri.Babu Joseph permitted to operate stage carriage service on the route Pampady – Ponkunnam with valid regular permit up to 10/02/2020 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. The matter was enquired through MVI, Kottayam. The applicants appeared before Secretary RTA , Kottayam on 13/11/2017 and revealed that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

103

Item No 78 C3/115743/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL-38-E-8015 on the route Kottayam – Vakkadu from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd applicant.

Applicants:-1.Sri.Sibi,Pulingappallil,Ettumanoor,Kottayam

2. Sri.Prajith,Poovathumchuvattil,Thalayolapparambu,Kottayam

Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL-38-E-8015 Sri.Sibi permitted to operate stage carriage service on the route Kottayam – Vakkadu with valid regular permit up to 19/08/2018 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. The matter was enquired through MVI, Kottayam. The applicants appeared before Secretary RTA , Kottayam on 21/10/2017 and revealed that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

104

Item No 79 C3/126704/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL-05-P-8775 on the route Kottayam – Kozhencherry from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd applicant.

Applicants:-1.Sri.Varghese.V.M,Mullankuzhiyil[H],Narakathani.P.O, Pathanamthitta

2. Sri.Sunil.K.Easo,Ajilithoppil [H],Changanacherry

Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL-05-P-8775 Sri.Varghese.V.M permitted to operate stage carriage service on the route Kottayam – Kozhencherry with valid regular permit up to 15/05/2022 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. The matter was enquired through MVI, Kottayam. The applicants appeared before Secretary RTA , Kottayam on 14/11/2017 and revealed that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

105

Item No. 80 C3/129751/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for transfer of permit in respect of S/C KL-05-X-7735 on the route Kottayam – Sasthangal from the name of the 1st applicant to the name of the 2nd applicant.

Applicants:-1.Smt.Mary Devasiachan,Ponmankal[H],Thellakam.P.O,Kottayam

2. Sri.P.M.Mathew, Ponmankal[H],Thellakam.P.O,Kottayam

Notes:-

The permit holder of S/C KL-05-X-7735 Sri.Varghese.V.M permitted to operate stage carriage service on the route Kottayam – Kaipuzha Sasthangal with valid regular permit up to 11/02/2022 along with the second applicant have jointly applied for the transfer of permit. The matter was enquired through MVI, Kottayam and revealed that

1. The vehicle is now under control and possession of the 1st applicant. He intends to sell the vehicle to the 2nd applicant. 2. The 2nd applicant is intended to purchase the vehicle from the permit holder and he is financially sound to maintain stage carriage. 3. The proposed transfer of permit is not defeat the interest of the employees. 4. The application for transfer of permit is not violates the provisions of (a) &(b) of S.81(4] of MV Act 1988,KMV Rule 145(1,i]&178(2). 5. The joint application for transfer of permit is genuine and bonafide

Hence the RTA may hear the applicants, peruse the records and take a decision.

106

Item No. 81 C1/116445/2016/K

Agenda:1.To peruse the Judgment in WPC No 17202 of 2017 dtd 11/8/2017.

2. To reconsider the application for renewal of regular permit in respect of S/C KL 05 M 3479 on the route KNJIRAM JETTY - KOTTAYAM Via ILLICKAL,MANIKUNNAM AND KARAPUZHA.

Applicant:-Sri.SONYKURIAN,PULLAMKULAM,MAMMOODUP.O,CHANGANACHERRY

(a) Regular Permit valid up to :10/11/2016[ Pt No.5/3397/2011] (b) Date of filing application : 15/10/2016 (c) TP U/S 87 [i][d] valid up to : 30/11/2017 (d) Registration validity up t o :30/07/2017

Notes:- The permit holder of S/C.KL 05 M 3479on the route KNJIRAM JETTY-KOTTAYAM Via ILLICKAL,MANIKUNNAM AND KARAPUZHA has applied for the renewal of regular permit for a period of 5 years from the date of expiry of the permit. Regular permit valid up to 10/11/2016. The route portion lies in Kottayam district.

The application was placed before the RTA held on 02/02/2017 and since the permit is issued after 9/05/2006 and route portion from Pulimood Junction to Gandhisquare 100mts lies in –Kottayam scheme and from Seematty round to Gomathy pump 400 mts lies in Ernakulam – Thekkady and Kottayam – Thekkadky scheme , which violates GO[P] No 42/2009 dtd 14/7/2009.Hence the application for the renewal of regular permit is rejected .Now the permit holder produced Judgment in WPC No 17202 of 2017 dtd . 11/8/2017 in which it is directed to renew the permit in accordance with law as is sought for in the application at the earliest . The permit holder also submitted application for replacement with a later model stage carriage with registration mark KL 06 C 9854 since the registration validity of the vehicle KL 05 M 3479 expired on 30/07/2017 .Now the vehicle is under Form G from the period And Temporary permit issued in the vacancy of the route bus up to 30/11/2017

The enquiry report of MVI Kottayam, reveals the following facts

1.Total distance of the route :8KMkms 2.Intra/Inter district route : Intra district.

3Details of Overlapping :a)From Pulimood Junction to Gandhisquare 100 mts lies in Thiruvananthapuram –Kottayam scheme

b)Seematty round to Gomathy Pump 400 mts lies in Ernakulam – Thekkady and Kottayam- Thekkady scheme 107

5. Details of HPA and NOC from :Nil. finance company : 6. Court direction if any : Judgment in WPC No 17202 of 2017 dtd . 11/8/2017 in which it is directed to renew the permit in accordance with law as is sought for in the application at the earliest .

7. Other relevant points : This permit is issued after 14/07/2009.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant peruse the file and take a decision in this matter

108

Item No. 82 C1/80933/2017/K

Agenda:To consider the application for renewal of regular permit in respect of S/C KL 34 513 on the route PONKUNNAM - TEMPLE Via, Chirakadavu Temple, Thekkethukavala and .

Applicant:-Sri.SIJU PD, PICHAKAPPALLIL HOUSE, EAST P.O, CHIRAKKADAVU, PONKUNNAM

(a) Regular Permit valid up to :24/08/2017 [ Pt No.5/ 2577/2012] (b) Date of filing application : 13/07/2017 (c) TP on the basis of necessity report valid up to : 02/12/2017

Notes:- The permit holder of S/C KL 34 513 on the route PONKUNNAM-CHERUVALLY TEMPLE Via,Chirakadavu Temple,Thekkethukavala and Padanilam has applied for the renewal of regular permit for a period of 5 years from the date of expiry of the permit. Regular permit valid up to 24/08/2017. The route portion lies in Kottayam district.

The enquiry report of JRTO PALA, reveals the following facts

1.Total distance of the route :8 KMS 2.Intra/Inter district route : Intra district.

3Details of Overlapping :a)Ponkunnam Private Bus stand to KK Road Crossing 10 meters NH 183 for entering In Ponkunnam PVT.Bus Stand .This portion lies in Thiruvannathapuram – Thekkady ,and Kottayam –Kumily, Ernakulam – Thekkady and Changanacherry –Changanacherry circular scheme 5. Details Of HPA And NOC From :Nil

6. Court direction if any : Nil 7. Other relevant points : This permit is issued after 14/07/2009.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant peruse the file and take a decision in this matter

109

Item No. 83 C1/80933/2017/K

Agenda:1. To consider the application condonation of delay in submitting the application in time. 2.To consider the application for renewal of regular permit in respect of S/C.KL 33 D 3461 on the route CHANGANACHERRY- ERATTUPETTA Via, Karukachal, Manimala,and Kanjirappally

Applicant:-Smt. Subaida Nazar, Pathalilkarottu, Nedumkunnam P O, Changanacherry (a) Regular Permit valid up to : 21/06/2017[ Pt No.5/19/1997] (b) Date of filing application : 12/06/2017 (c) TP U/S 87[1[D] : 22/02/2018

Notes:- The permit holder of S/C.KL 33 D 3461 on the route CHANGANACHERRY- ERATTUPETTA Via, Karukachal, Manimala,and Kanjirappally has applied for the renewal of regular permit for a period of 5 years from the date of expiry of the permit. Regular permit valid up to 21/06/2017. The route portion lies in Kottayam district. The permit holder submitted the renewal of permit application only on 12/06/2017 hence delay condonation application also submitted and hearing conducted on 03/07/2017. The route portion lies in Kottayam district.

The enquiry report of JRTO CHANGANACHERRY , reveals the following facts

1.Total distance of the route :59.2 kms 2.Intra/Inter district route : Intra district.

3Details of Overlapping :a)14 kms from changanacherry Vazhoor PBS to Karukachal lies in Trivandrum – Thekkady via changanacherry 23861/TB3/66 /PW dtd 10/10/1966[b]16 kms from Karukachal to Manimala lies in Changanacherry –Changanacherry circular secheme [c] 0.6 km from Kurisukavala to Pettakavala lies in 23861/TB3/66 /PW dtd 10/10/1966

6. Court direction if any : Nil 7. Other relevant points : This permit is issued before 14/07/2009. This permit is beneficial for the public especially students travelling from Kanjirappally to Changanacherry and Remarked that the permit is beneficial for the last 15 years

Hence RTA may hear the applicant peruse the file and take a decision in this matter

110

Item No. 84 C1/76290/2017/K

Agenda: 1.To Re consider the application for renewal of regular permit in respect of S/C KL 05 AM 63 on the route KOTTAYAM - CHAMAKKALA Via, Parepally Vedagiri, Kottamuri, Ettumanoor, Carithas, Adichira, And Kurmaranalloor.

Applicant :-Smt.Thressiamma Joy, [POSSESSOR] , Kunnathu house, Thellakom P.O, Ettumanoor , Kottayam Dtd 30/06/2017.

(a) Regular Permit valid up to :05/05 2017[permit no5/100011/2002] (b) Date of filing application : 30/06/2017 (c)4 Months TP u/s 87 [1] c [wpc No 22031 Of 2017 D dtd 4/07/2017 : 17/03/2018

Notes:- The permit holder of S/C.KL 05 AM 63 on the route KOTTAYAM- CHAMAKKALA Via, Parepally Vedagiri, Kottamuri, Ettumanoor, Carithas, Adichira, And Kurmaranalloor has applied for the renewal of regular permit for a period of 5 years from the date of expiry of the permit. Regular permit expired on 05/05/2017. The permit issued before 9/05/2006 .The permit holder submitted an application for delay condonation along with a medical certificate issued by the Dr. R BIJU ,B. A.M, VETTOM, PERUMBAIKADU P.O, KOTTAYAM.Also the permit holder produced a Judgment in WPC No 22031 of 2017 [D] dtd 4/07/2017 .Which directed the secretary RTA to attain finality to application for 4 months T P u/s 87[1]C within a period of two weeks . In this ground 4 months TP issued and the same is renewed up to 17/03/2018. The applications placed before the RTA held on 25/07/2017 and Perused the file and enquiry report. On the sitting day of RTA Kottayam on 25/07/2017 the learned counsel represented one objector,Sri Monesh P.R, has submitted a judgment in WPC No 24266 of 2017 dated 21/07/2017 directing RTA to take on board the objection (Ext P4 in the WPC No 24266 of 2017 dated 21/07/2017) when the permit application is submitted by the permit holder of SC KL-05-AM-63 is considered,which according to learned counsel for the petitioner scheduled to 25/07/2017 and attain finality,at the earliest,and at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of the judgement.Secretary RTA is directed to enquire and report the genuines of Ext P4 in the WPC No 24266 of 2017 dated 21/07/2017 and place before next RTA with due notice to the objector and registred owner of SC KL-05-AM-63.Hence adjourned.

The enquiry report is submitted by the officer and reveals the following facts

[1].The registered owner of KL 05 AL 1208 Sri Monesh is the objector .The vehicle is conducting stage carriage service in the route Maniyaparambu –Kottayam as mofusal service. While the S/C KL 05 AM 63 conducts stage carriage service in the route Chamakala – Kottayam as Town service .ie, These two vehicles conducts stage carriage services in different routes and class of service.

2] S/C KL 05 AM 63 conducts stage carriage service on the route Kallampara –Kottayam as town service before variation of permit as Chamakkala – Kottayam . The variation of permit is 111

granted in the RTA held on 06/11/2014 and the route portion is changed as 20.9KM instead of 18.7 KM. Hence to ratify whether the class of vehicle is mofusal or city cervices the file is consider in RTA held on 14/05/2015 and decided that the vehicle is town service

3.Most of the town service vehicles in the Ettumanoor – Kottayam Sector has not settled their time as per D3.Vehicles conducts service with time gap of 2.5m/km and 3m/km

4.The Kottayam Municipal limit is from Kottayam to Gandhinagar and Ettumanoor municipal town limit is from Adichira to Ettumanoor Cylon Junction . As per D3 timing the vehicles in this sector have to conduct service in the time gap of 3 m /km and 2.5m/km in the outer limit . At the time of setting the time limit as per D3 the objection may be consider 5.The objector has right to apply for settle the time as per D3

6. Change in the timings of one vehicle as per the application of another person has not consider without an Order from any Judicial Forum.

The enquiry report of MVI KOTTAYAM , reveals the following facts

1.Total distance of the route :19 kms 2.Intra/Inter district route : Intra 3Details of Overlapping :a).11 kms, from Kottayam – Ettumanoor lies in The scheme Kottayam- Kozhekode & Ernakulam –Thekkady 5. Details Of HPA And NOC From : NOC produced from the finance company finance company : 6. Court direction if any : Yes, Judgment in WPC No 22031 of 2017 [D dtd 4/07/2017 Which directed the secretary RTA to attain finality to application for months T P u/s 87[1]C within a period of two weeks

7. Other relevant points : .The permit is issued prior to 09/05/2006

Hence RTA may hear the applicant peruse the file and take a decision in this matter

112

Item No. 85 C2/62800/2017/K

Agenda: To consider the application for renewal of permit in respect of leased S/C KL 35 B 4025 on the route Kodungoor - Cherthala via, Pallickathodu, Poovathilappu, Ayarkkunnam, Ettumanoor, Athirampuzha Market Jun, University, Attukaran Kavala, Pravattom Jun, Neendoor , Kallara, Perumthuruth, Edayazham, Bund Road & Thanneer as ordinary service for a further period of 5 years from the date of expiry.[permit issued after 14/07/2009]

Applicant - Smt. Philip C Jhon, S/o John, Chiraykkal house, Lakkattoor North, Lakkattoor P O, Kooroppada, Kottayam

(a) Regular Permit valid up to 18/10/2017

(b) Temporary Permit valid up to 18/02/2018

(c) Date of filing application : 10/05/2017

Notes: Leased S/C KL 35 B 4025 conducts regular stage carriage service on the route Kodungoor - Cherthala via, Pallickathodu, Poovathilappu, Ayarkkunnam, Ettumanoor, Athirampuzha Market Jun, University, Attukaran Kavala, Pravattom Jun, Neendoor , Kallara, Perumthuruth, Edayazham, Bund Road & Thanneer Mukkam on the strength of regular pemit valid upto 18/10/2017. The permit holder has applied for renewal of regular permit for a further period of 5 years from the date of expiry.

The regular permit was granted by RTA at its sitting on 22/05/2012 in compliance with the judgment in M V A A 22/2012 which was stated as follows. “When it has already been found that the overlapping from Pravattom to Neendoor is mere inevitable intersection, the authority below [RTA,Kottayam] ought not to have rejected the application in case there is no other overlapping over any other sector. In the impugned order also the authority below has no case that there is overlapping over any sector other than from Pravattom to Neendoor. Matters being so, the impugned order [Order No.G1/1385/2011/K, Dated 23/11/11, of RTA,Kottayam – the fresh permit application was rejected] is liable to be set aside.

In the result, this appeal is allowed, and the impugned order is set aside, and the authority below [RTA,Kottayam] is directed to grant the fresh regular permit sought for, subject to the settlement of timings.”

Details of the route as follows.

1.Total distance of the route :58.5 kms. 113

2.Intra/Inter district route : Inter district. [ District -8 kms &

Kottayam District -50.5 kms

3.Details of concurrence : N.A.

4.Details of Overlapping : Konikkal Jn - Ettumanoor - 0.7 kms. [Kottayam – Kattappana Scheme] Pravattom Jn. – Neendoor - 1.6 kms. [Kottayam – Neendoor Scheme] KSRTC Cherthala – Boys School Jun -0.2 kms [Trivandrum – Scheme] Irumpupalam Jun. – Court Junction- 0.15 kms.

Total overlapping – 2.65 kms

5. Details of HPA and NOC from

finance company : Nil.

6. Court direction if any : Nil

7. Other relevant points : This permit is issued after 14/07/2009. Total

overlapping is not under permissible limit [ie; greater than 1.55 kms]

Hence, RTA may hear the applicant, peruse the file and take a decision.

114

Item No 86 C2/ 109410/2016/K

Agenda:- 1. To consider the request for condonation of delay in submitting the application for renewal of regular permit in respect of leased stage carriage KL 67 A 6065 in time.

2.To consider the application for the renewal of regular permit in respect of leased S/C KL 67 A 6065 on the route Pala -Koothattukulam via, Chakkampuzha, Ramapuram, Erappumkara and Poovakkulam as ordinary service for a further period of 5 years from the date of expiry of regular permit. . [Permit issued prior to 14/07/2009]

Applicant:- Sri.Jaise Kuriakose [Possessor], Kanjirapparayil house, Uzhavoor P O, Kottayam

(a) Regular Permit valid up to : 09/10/2016

(b) Date of filing application : 26/09/2016

© Temp Pt U/S 87[i][c] : 23/03/2018

Notes:- S/C KL 67 A 6065 is having a regular permit on the route Pala -Koothattukulam via, Chakkampuzha, Ramapuram, Erappumkara and Poovakkulam. The regular permit is valid up to 09/10/2016. On 26/09/2016, the permit holder of leased S/C KL 67 A 6065 was submitted an application for renewal of RP and a temporary permit U/S 87 [i][d]. The permit holder was also submitted a request for condonation of delay in submitting the application in time. Report of MVI , Pala has been received and states that

1.Total distance of the route : 27.100 kms.

2.Intra/Inter district route : Inter district. [RTA,Kottayam – 24.2 kms, RTA,

Muvattupuzha-2.9 kms]

3.Details of concurrence : General Concurrence granted.

4.Details of Overlapping:1.7 kms overlaps with Kottayam – Kattappana Scheme & 0.400 Meters overlaps with Kottayam – Scheme

5. Details of HPA and NOC from

finance company :Sundaram Finance Ltd, Cochin.. Produced NOC

6. Court direction if any : In obedience to the Judgment of Honorable H C of Kerala in WP[c] No 33681/2016 a temporary permit U/S 87[i][c] for 04 months up to 23/03/2018 was issued.

7. Other relevant points : Request for condonation of delay was submitted. This permit is issued prior to 14/07/2009.

Hence the RTA may hear the applicant, peruse the file and take a decision.

115

Item No 87 C1/ 54398/2017/K

Agenda:- 1.To Re consider the application for variation of regular permit in respect of KL 05 AE 3285 as LSOS on the route CHERTHALA - KALOOR BUS STAND VIA, KIAPUZHAMUTTU,ALUMMOODU, GANDHINAGAR, MEDICAL COLLEGE, MG UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMPUZHA, ETTUMANOOR, KANAKKARI, KURUPPANTHARA, CEYLON JUNCTION, THALAYOLAPARAMBU, KANJIRAMATTTOM, PUTHENKAVU, TRIPUNITHURA, VYTILA, PALLIMUKKU, JETTY & MENAKA Now AS FAST PASSENGER. Variation of permit as CHERTHALA –KALOOR BS by converting the service as LSOS

Applicant:-Sri.Thankachan, Valel, Nattassery, S H Mount P.O, Kottayam

(a) Regular Permit valid up to :25/06/2016 (b) Date of filing application :31/05/2016 (c) Temporary permit valid up to : 25/02/2018 (d) Permit No : 05/103/1991 Existing Timings CHERTHALA KAIPUZHAMUTTU KOTTAYAM THALAYOLAPARAMBU VYTILA HUB A D A P D A D A P D A D 4.25AM 5.05 6.15 7.16 10.36 9.56 8.46 7.45 10.38 11.13 11.20 12.30 01.31 4.17 3.16 5.30 4.20 5.35 6.43 6.15 7.15 7.43HALT

Notes:- S/C KL 05 AE 3285 conducts regular stage carriage service on the route CHERTHALA-KALOOR BUS STAND VIA, KIAPUZHAMUTTU,ALUMMOODU, GANDHINAGAR, MEDICAL COLLEGE, MG UNIVERSITY,ATHIRAMPUZHA, ETTUMANOOR, KANAKKARI,KURUPPANTHARA, CEYLON JUNCTION, THALAYOLAPARAMBU, KANJIRAMATTTOM , PUTHENKAVU, TRIPUNITHURA,VYTILA, PALLIMUKKU, JETTY & MENAKA AS FAST PASSENGER with a valid regular permit up to 25/06/2016 and settled set of timings. [The permit is issued before 09/05/2006 as fast passenger. While the permit expired on 25/06/2016There after the permit is not renewed since GOP No 73/12 dtd 16/7/2013 the private operators are permitted to operate their higher class service till the expiry of their respective permit .The permit holder submitted application for renewal of permit and variation of the permit as LSOS instead of Fast Passenger vide reference 5/63714/2016 k dated 04/06/2016.Which is placed before the RTA held on 01/09/2016 and as per the order ,since the 116

permit is inter district route in which route portion 32 kms in the total route length lies in and 8 kms in Alapuzha district. Hence it is adjourned .Consideration of application for variation is also adjourned .As per the decision of the RTA held on 02/02/2017 distance less than 50 kms do not need concurrence Hence the permit holder requested to renew the regular permit and also requested to re consider the application for variation of regular permit as CHERTHALA –KALOOR BS by converting the service as LSOS

1.The enquiry report of MVI Kottayam, reveals the following facts: Total distance of the route 104.7 kms[Kottayam-64.7kms, Ernakulam 32kms, Alappuzha 8 kms]

2.Intra/ Inter district route:Inter district

3.Details of concurrence :To be obtained from RTA Ernakulam

4.Details of Overlaping :46.3kms overlaps on EKM –THEKKADY scheme 2.6kms

On KTM –Neendoor Scheme

5.Details of HPA and NOC from : Having HPA and NOC Produced

Finance company

6.Court direction if any : nil

7. Other relevant points : This permit is issued prior to 9/05/2006.Now the vehicle is conducting service on the strength of a 4 months temporary permit issued as per GO[MS]No 45/2015dtd 20/8/2015 .The validity of permit up to 25/02/2018

Hence RTA may hear the applicant , peruse files and take a decision in this matter .

117

Item No 88 C1/12115/2017/K

Agenda :-1.Peruse the Judgement in MVAA No 240/2015 dated 22/7/207 of Honorable STAT

2.To reconsider the application for variation of regular permit in respect of S/C KL 36 A 61 on the route KAIPUZHAMUTTU - BRAHMAMANGALAM Via, Ullala, Vaikom, Udyanapuram, Toll, Kattukunnu, Poothotta, Puthenkavu school, Kanjiramattam, Aryankavu and Neerpara. Variation of permit as Kaipuzhamuttu – Brahmamangalam on the same via with change of termini [Starting and halting place changed as Kaipuzhamuttu instead of Poothotta ]by curtailing the 1 st trip from Poothotta to Vaikom at 5.30 am and Last Trip from Vaikom to Poothotta at 8.15pm.

Applicant:- Smt. Jolly Chacko, Ambattuputhenpura, Ambikamarket P.O, Vaikom, Kottayam

(a) Regular Permit Valid up to :- 29/01/2022 (b) Date of filing the application :29/01/2015 Existing Timings

Kaipuzhamuttu Vaikom Poothotta Brhmamangalam A D A P D A P D A D 6.00 5.30 6.47 7.17 7.37 8.40 8.10 7.50 9.15 9.20 9.55 10.10 10.40 11.00 12.25 11.55 11.35 1.05 1.15 1.50 2.20 2.40 4.35 4.00 3.30 3.10 4.55 5.30 5.33 6.03 6.23 7.15 6.45 6.25 8.15 8.45 HALT

Proposed Timings

Kaipuzhamuttu Vaikom Poothotta Brhmamangalam A D A P D A P D A D 6.12 6.48 7.19 7.38 9.17 8.41 8.10 7.50 9.23 9.59 10.10 10.41 11.01 12.26 11.55 11.35 1.07 12.31 1.15 1.51 2.22 2.40 4.37 4.01 3.30 3.10 118

4.55 5.31 5.33 6.04 6.24 7.16 6.45 6.25 7.56 HALT 7.20 Notes:-

The permit holder of stage carriage S/C KL 36 A 61 on the route Kaipuzhamuttu –Brahmamangalam has applied for the variation of permit. Variation of permit as Kaipuzhamuttu – Brhamangalam on the same via with the change of termini [ Starting and halting place changed as Kaipuzhamuttu instead of Poothotta ]by curtailing the 1st trip from Poothotta to Vaikom at 5.30 am and Last Trip from Vaikom to Poothotta at 8.15 pm.The application is placed before the RTA held on 14/05/2015 and is rejected for the enquiry report reveles that the proposed curtailment of trip definitely reduce the travelling facility of the existing passengers .Now the permit holder produced Judgement in MVAA No 240/2015 dated 22/7/207 of Honorable STAT which directed to consider the matter in accordance with the principles of natural justice as stated herein above. [ the application for variation of regular permit is rejected on the ground that the field officers report is not available to the appellant, The contention may be too technical, still the contention is legally available to the appellant and is sustainable in law . in the view of the circumstances, it is just and proper to remind the matter to the 1st respondent for fresh consideration .

Hence a detailed enquiry has been conducted through JRTO VAIKOM regarding the matter and he has submitted a detailed report as per the deision of D3/STA/875/2005 Dtd 08/11/2011 that revelas the following facts

1.Details of the existing route length: Kaippuzhamuttu-Brhmamangalam [35 kms]

2.Details of the existing permit :PT.No 5/10002/2007 valid up to 29/1/2022

3.Route and distance of variation :[a]. First trip service from Poothotta is changed as Kaipuzhamuttu at 6.12 am.[b] The last trip service from Vaikom to Poothotta changed as Vikom – Kaippuzhamuttu at 7.18 pm

4.Distance of the extension portion : Vaikom to Kaippuzhamuttu 15 kms

5.Distance of the entire route after variation :15km

6.whether any change in starting/halting place :-yes

7.Any virgin portion in the vitiated route :nil

8.Overlaping portion in the notified route for variation :- nil

9.Details of effect on variation /extension [a]. Extent ion to Kaippuzhamuttu for the first trip

portion 15kms only .[b] No new additional over 119

lapping portion included after vartiation [c]

Change in starting and halting places as

Kaippuzhamuttu in lieu of Poothotta [d]

There is no change in route other than this

variation

10. Details of timing for the variation portion : Time sheet prepared as per D3/875/STA/2005

Of STA

11.Frequency of s/c service in the variation : Enough s/c services

Portion place

12.Court Directions if any : Judgement in MVAA No 240/2015 dated 22/7/207 of Honorable STAT which directed to consider the matter in accordance with the principles of natural justice as stated herein above. [ the application for variation of regular permit is rejected on the ground that the field officers report is not available to the appellant, The contention may be too technical, still the contention is legally available to the appellant and is sustainable in law . in the view of the circumstances, it is just and proper to remind the matter to the 1st respondent for fresh consideration .

13. Other relevant points :[a]This variation of permit helpful for the people en route to reach at towns of bund road, Vaikom and connect to Alappuzha , Cherthala etc

[b] It will be helpful for students and agriculture labourers of the concerned area

[c] This request timings and permit was in the vacancy of s/c kl 7 /9718

[d] This variation does not affect the time schedule of other stage carriages

[e] From Poothotta to Vaikom and return enough stage carriage services including KSRTC operating and hence no paucity for conveyance

[f] May be considered the application and settle the timings after a time conference convened

[g] Time schedule and sketch attached here with

Hence RTA may hear the applicant , peruse files and take a decision in this matter .

120

Item No 89 C1/14743/2016/K

Agenda :-1.Peruse the Judgement in MVAA No 99/2016 dated 28/02/2016 of Honorable STAT

2.To reconsider the application for variation of regular permit in respect of S/C KL 33 B 3232 on the route CHENAPPADY – ERATTUPETTA Via, Vayalumkal, Anchilippa, Kanjirappally, Kappadu, Kalaketty, Pinnakkanadu, and Thidanadu with two round cut trip as Kanjirappally –Thampalakkadu with starting and halting at Chenappady Variation of permit as Mukkada – Erattupetta by

1.Extension – from Chenappady to Mukkada via, Marottichuvadu , Karikkattoor Centre and Cheruvally

2.Curtailment – Existing two round cut trips from Kanjirappally to Thampalakkadu as only one round cut trip

3.Change of starting and halting places as Mukkada [Now at Chenappady]

Applicant:- Sri .Muhammed Yosuf , Chirakuzhy Manzil, Chirakkadavu, Kanjirappally.

Regular Permit Valid up to : 06/10/2019

Date of filing the application :04/02/2016

Existing Timings

CHENAPPADY THAMBALAKKADU KANJIRAPPALLY ERATTUPETTA A D A D A P D A D 7.15 7.35 7.40 8.20 9.48 9.30 8.50 10.00 10.18 10.25 11.05 12.40 12.20 11.40 12.55 1.15 1.53 1.35 1.57 2.15 2.35 2.15 2.40 3.00 3.24 4.04 5.12 4.32 5.12 5.52 6.45 6.05 7.44HALT 7.25

121

Proposed Timings

MUKKADA CHENAPPADY THAMBALAKKADU KANJIRAPPALLY ERATTUPETTA A D A P D A P D A P D A D 6.55 7.12 7.32 8.12 9.45 9.30 8.50 10.00 10.15 10.55 12.57 12.40 12.20 11.40 1.25 1.42 2.02 2.35 2.15 2.40 3.00 3.40 5.12 4.32 5.15 5.55 7.05 6.45 6.05

Notes:-

The permit holder of stage carriage S/C KL 33 B 3232[OLD NO.KL 34 6859 ] on the route CHENAPPADY – ERATTUPETTA Via, Vayalumkal, Anchilippa, Kanjirappally, Kappadu, Kalaketty, Pinnakkanadu, and Thidanadu with two round cut trip as Kanjirappally –Thampalakkadu with starting and halting at Chenappady as Mukkada – Erattupetta by [1.]Extension – from Chenappady to Mukkada via, Marottichuvadu , Karikkattoor Centre and Cheruvally [2.]Curtailment – Existing two round cut trips from Kanjirappally to Thampalakkadu as only one round cut trip [3].Change of starting and halting places as Mukkada [Now at Chenappady]. The application is placed before the RTA held on 25/04/2016 and is rejected subject to the enquiry officer reported that the curtailment will badly affect the existing passengers . There is no special circumstances U/R 145[6]I&II of the KMV Rules is reported and hence rejected. Now the permit holder produced the Judgement in MVAA No 99/2016 dated 28/02/2016 of Honorable STAT .In which the case is remanded back to the RTA for fresh consideration after affording the appellant to file objections to the field officers report and pass fresh orders within three months from the date of receipt of the copy of the order .

Hence a detailed enquiry has been conducted through JRTO Kanjirappally regarding the matter and he has submitted a detailed report Dtd 17/8/2017 that revelas the following facts

1.Details of the existing route length: CHENAPPADY-ERATTUPETTA -30 KM S

2.Details of the existing permit :permit validity up to 06/10/2019 [Permit No 5/2215/2014]

3.Route and distance after proposed variation :36.8 kms

4.Distance of the extension portion : 6.8km from Chenappady to Mukkada

5.Distance of the entire route after variation :36.8kms 122

6.Any virgin portion in the vitiated route :Nil

8.Nature of Variatio :- 1. Curtailment [a] round trip from Kanjirappally to Thambalakkad-[6 km]

2.Etxe nsion [b] Single trips from Chenappady to Mukkada [6.8kms] Via

Marottichuvadu and Charuvely

9.Tota l distance of variation [specify whether : 6.8 KM Extension from Chenappady to Mukkada

within the limit U/S 80 [3]of MVACT 6.0 KM Curtailment from Kanjirappally to

Thumbalakkadu Both variation are within the Provision u/s 80[3] of MV Act 1988

10.Overlaping detatils after variation :1km Kanjirappally Bus stand to Kanjirappally Petta jn lies in Ernakulam –Kumali Notified route

11.Virgin Portion if any :No

12.Nature of service after variation :Ordinary

13 Comments on Proposed variation :The applicant informed that he intends to curtail one round cut trip to Thambalakkadu departing Kanjirappally at 01.30 pm . As per information collected on enquiry, the preceding stage carriage shall depart Kanjirappally at 1.17 pm and succeeding stage carriage shall depart Kanjirappally at 2.00 pm, ie, the time gap will increase as 43 minutes if the curtailment is allowed .This will adversely affect the travelling Public including students on Kanjirappally –Thambalakkadu route.The proposed extension from Chenappady to Mukkada isbenifical to travelling public esoecially for students, since at present only two s/c are conducting service on Kanjirappally – Chenappady –Mukkada route .

14.Court Directions if any : Judgement in MVAA No 99/2016 dated 28/02/2016 of Honorable STAT In which the case is remanded back to the RTA for fresh consideration after affording the appellant to file objections to the field officers report and pass fresh orders within three months from the date of receipt of the copy of the order. Needless to say that all the affected parties shall be put on notice in the exercise

15. comments and suggestins on the time schedule : The scheduled may be fixed after convening timing conference of the operators on the extended route to avoid time clash and unhealthy competition

16.Remark : Nil

Hence RTA may hear the applicant , peruse files and take a decision in this matter . 123

Item No 90 C1/118291/2016/K

Agenda :-1.To consider the application for variation of regular permit in respect of S/C KL 05 A D 190 on the route KOTTAYAM – ADICHIPUZHA via, MANNARCADU, KARUKACHAL, PATHANAD, MANIMALA , RANNI, Variation of permit as KOTTAYAM –PERUNTHENARUVI with extension of service on the route portion from ADICHIPUZHA to PERUNTHENARUVI Via Athikayam .

Applicant:- Sri .Saju Mon J Matthil, Poovappally Mattathil house, Parampuzha, Kottayam

(a) Regular Permit Valid up to : 02/05/2017 [permit No. 5/ 10108/1997] (b) Date of filing the application : 18/10/2016 Existing Timings

KOTTAYAM KARUKACHAL MANIMALA RANNY ADICHIPUZHA A D P P A P D A P D 6.28 7.28 8.08 8.48 9.18 12.18 11.18 10.38 9.58 9.28 12.46 01.46 02.26 03.06 3.36 4.10 3.40 4.15 4.45 5.00 7.50halt 6.50 6.10 5.30 Proposed Timings

Kottayam Karukachal Manimala Ranni Adichi Athik Perun puzha kayam henaruvi A D P P A P D A P D P A D 6.28 7.28 8.08 8.48 9.13 12.18 11.18 10.38 9.53 9.58 9.28 12.46 1.46 2.26 3.06 3.25 3.50 4.02 4.17 5.17 4.52 4.40 4.25 7.50 6.50 6.10 5.30 HALT Notes:-

The permit holder of stage carriage S/C KL 05 AD 190 on the route KOTTAYAM – ADICHIPUZHA via, MANNARCADU, KARUKACHAL, PATHANAD, MANIMALA , RANNI, Variation of permit as KOTTAYAM – PERUNTHENARUVI with extension of service on the route portion from ADICHIPUZHA to PERUNTHENARUVI Via Athikayam. Hence a detailed enquiry has been conducted through JRTO RANNI regarding the matter and he has submitted a detailed report Dtd 06/01/2017 that revelas the following facts

1.Details of the existing route length: 68 KM [KOTTAYAM –ADICHIPUZHA ]

2.Details of the existing permit :PT.No 5/10108/1997 valid up to 02/05/2017, 4 MONTHS TP U/S 87[1]D-05/01/2018 124

3.Route and route length after proposed variation:- Kottayam –Perunthenaruvi -77.5kms

4.Distance of the extension portion : Adichipuzha – Perunthenaruvi 9.5 KMS

5.Distance of the entire route after variation :77.5KM

6.whether any change in starting/halting place :-NIL

7.Any virgin portion in the vitiated route :Nil

8.Overlaping portion in the notified route for variation :- Nil

9.Details of effect on variation /extension [a ]Adichipuzha – Perunthenaruvi 9.5 KMS

10. Comments and suggestions on the time schedule : Time schedule may be settled

12.Court Directions if any Nil

13. Other relevant points :[a] The proposed extension will help the travelling people residing in tourist place PERUNTHENARUVI. Termini may change during extension

Hence RTA may hear the applicant , peruse files and take a decision

125

Item No. 91 C1/93329/2015/K

Agenda:- 1.To reconsider the application for converting the service as LSOS in respect of S/C KL 34 C 1427 on the route Elamcadu - Ernakulam Kaloor Bus Stand (via) Yendayar, Koottickal, Mundakayam, Kanjirappally, Erattupetta, Pala, Kuruvilangadu, , Kaduthuruthy, Thalyolaparambu,Kanjiramattom, Thripunithura, And Vyttila as Fast Passenger to LSOS.

Applicant:-Sri,P S Binu,Pazhoor,Palampra,Kanjirapally. (a) Regular Permit valid up to : 20/08/2015 pt no 5/1103/2000 (b) Date of filing application : 08/09/2015[Variation] (d)Validity of Temporaray permit;21/03/2018.As LS OS Notes:- The initial permit was issued on the route Elamakdu-Kaoor B S as Fast Passenger. Now the S/C KL 34 C 1427 is operating on this route with a temporary permit u/s87[1]d issued as LSOS as per GO[MS] No 45/2015 DTD 20/8/2015. The applications for 1. Renewal of permit 2. Conversion of service as LSOS and Ratification of issued temporary permit as LSOS were placed before the RTA held on 12/11/2015and the following decisions has been taken .

1.Secretary RTA will call the concurrence from the RTA Ernakulam for the renewal of regular permitas limited stop ordinary service. Hence adjourned

2.Regular permit variation application is adjourned [3.]Ratified.

Now the permit holder has applied to reconsider the application for conversion of the class of the permit from Fast Passenger to LSOS.As per the Gop No;73/13 dtd 16/07/2013 the private operators are permitted to operate their higher class service till the expiry of their respective permit

.The enquiry report of MVI Kottayam, reveals the following facts 1.Total distance of the route :126kms.[Kottayam-96kms,Ernakulam-30kms] 2.Intra/Inter district route : Inter district. 3.Details of concurrence : Genenral concurrence Vide order no G/4501/17/E Dtd 23/02/2017 4.Details of Overlapping : Mundakayam to Kanjirapally 14kms,Kottaramattam to Erattupetta 13kms,Pala to Kottaramattam 1km,Kaduthuruthy to Thalayolaparambu 8kms,100mts on ,200mts at on M C Road,Nellimoottilpady to Bye pas Jn 100mts and Placherry to Pathanamthitta 20kms over laps on notified route [Total overlapping-43.3kms] 5. Details of HPA and NOC from :Having HPA and NOC Produced. finance company : 6. Court direction if any :nil . 7. Other relevant points : This permit is issued prior to 14/7/2009.[saved permit] Now the vehicle is conducting service on the strength of a 4 month temporary permit issued as per GO[MS] No.45/2015 dtd 20-08-2015.and the validity of permit up to 21/03/22018

Hence RTA may hear the applicant, peruse files and take a decision in this matter.

126

Item No 92 C3/45840/2017/K

Agenda.:- To Consider the application for variation of permit in respect of S/C KL-36-E-7992 operating on the route Palamkadavu - Kottayam Via Vaikom ,Vechoor As Last trip curtailment from Vaikom to Palamkadavu and extend from Palamkadavu to Thalayolapparambu at a distance of 2 km .

A. By curtailing last trip from Vaikom to Palamkadavu

B. By extending the route portion from Palamkadavu to Thalayolapparambu at a distance of 2 km Applicant:- Sri.M.R.Gopalakrishnan.A.S,Meenamthuruth[H],Thalayazham.P.O,Vaikom

(a) Regular Permit issued on : 20/11/1979

(b) Regular permit valid up to : 19/11/2021

(c) Date of filing application : 15/07/2017

EXISTING TIMINGS

Palamkadavu Vaikom Kaippuzhamuttu Kumarakom Kottaym A D A P D A P D A P D A D 06.24 06.55 07.31 07.46 08.19 10.21 09.50 09.14 08.59 08.26 10.21 10.51 11.28 11.29 11.44 12.17 03.00 02.29 01.53 01.38 01.05 03.09 03.40 04.16 04.17 04.32 05.05 07.18 06.47 06.11 05.56 05.23 07.20 07.51 08.41(Halt) 08.10

PROPOSED TIMINGS

Thalayolaparambu Palamkadavu Vaikom Kaippuzhamuttu Kumarakam Kottayam A D A P D P A P D P A D 6.19 6.24 6.55 7.31 7.46 8.19 10.21 9.50 9.14 8.59 8.26 10.21 10.51 11.28 11.29 11.44 12.17 3.00 2.29 1.53 1.38 1.05 3.09 3.40 4.16 4.17 4.32 5.05 7.18 6.47 6.11 5.56 5.23 7.25 7.19 127

Notes:- S/C KL-36-E-7992 is covered by regular permit on the route Palamkadavu - Kottayam Via Vaikom ,Vechoor has applied for variation condition of regular permit As by Curtailing the Last trip from Vaikom to Palamkadavu and extend the route portion from Palamkadavu to Thalayolapparambu at a distance of 2 km . Enquiry conducted trough MVI ,Vaikom reveals the following

1. The distance of existing route : 44 Km [ Distance after Extension 46 km]

2. Intra/Inter district route : Intra District

3. Distance in each district if the route is inter district: Kottayam Only

4. The distance of curtailment : Not specified 5. The distance of extension : Extend from Palamkadavu to Thalayolaparambu at a distance of 2 km 6. The details of overlapping : Nil 7. Details of virgin portion and road fitness certificate: Nil

8. Whether the existing timings will be changed or not: Yes Changed at last trip of Vaikom to

Palamkadavu

9. Distance of variation on other districts : Nil

10.Nature of service after Extension : Moffusil

11. Details of concurrence : N/A

12. Necessity U/R 145[6] of KMV rules, feasibility and recommendations etc.: The proposed Extension will be beneficial to the travelling public to reach at Thalayolaparambu and it will be helpful for students and Agriculture laborers of the concerned area.

13. Court direction if any : Nil

14. Other relevant points if any : Enquiry officer specifically reported that there was a change in Termini and origin of service .There is no direct time clash, but may be settled only after timing conference.

Hence the RTA may peruse the report, file and take a decision. 128

Item No 93 C3/60635/2017/K

Agenda.:- To Consider the application for variation of permit in respect of S/C KL-36-8586 Pala- Ernakulam Via Marangattupally, Kuravilangadu, Kuruppanthara, Vaikom, , Gandhi Square & Petta Jn as L.S.O.S by extending the route portion from Vyttila to Edappally for a distance of 7 kms.

Applicant :- Sri.Sunny Abraham, Thottichirayil[H],Priyadarsni,Vaikom (a) Regular Permit issued on : 20/02/1999

(b) Regular permit valid up to : 19/02/2019

(c) Date of filing application : 25/05/2017

EXISTING TIMINGS

PALA VAIKOM VYTTILA HUB A D A P D A P D 7.12 8.11 8.52 11.11 9.51 12.03 1.23 1.28 2.31 3.06 5.35 4.05 4.15 6.01 7.21[H]

PROPOSED TIMINGS

PALA VAIKOM VYTTILA HUB EDAPPALLY A D A P D A P D A D 7.12 8.11 8.23 8.28 11.11 9.51 8.40 8.52 12.03 1.23 1.28 2.31 3.06 5.35 04.08 4.15 6.01 7.21 [H]

Notes:- S/C KL-36-8586 is covered by regular permit on the route Pala-Ernakulam Via Marangattupally, Kuravilangadu, Kuruppanthara, Vaikom, Thrippunithura, Gandhi Square & Petta Jn as L.S.O.S has applied for variation condition of regular permit As by by extending the route portion from Vyttila to Edappally for a distance of 7 kms.

Enquiry conducted trough MVI ,Ernakulam reveals the following 129

1. The distance of existing route : 71 km [ Distance after Extension 78 km]

2. Intra/Inter district route : Inter District

3. Distance in each district if the route is inter district: Kottayam dist – 51 km

Ernakulam dist -27

4. The distance of curtailment : Nil 5. The distance of extension : Extend from Vyttila to Edappally for a distance of 7 kms. 6. The details of overlapping : [a] No overlapping in the extension portion. [b] In the existing route , a distance of 17 kms from Poothotta to Vyttila Hub Via Nadakavu-Puthiyakavu-Thripunithura-Petta is objectionable overlapping ,as per Govt. Notifications GO[P] No.42/2009/Tran dtd 14/07/2009

7. Details of virgin portion and road fitness certificate: Nil

8. Whether the existing timings will be changed or not: Yes Changed

9. Distance of variation on other districts : Nil

10.Nature of service after Extension : Moffusil

11. Details of concurrence : 27 km [including extension-7km] in

RTAErnakulam

12. Necessity U/R 145[6] of KMV rules, feasibility and recommendations etc.:. The proposed Extension will be beneficial to the travelling public.

13. Court direction if any : Nil

14. Other relevant points if any : Enquiry officer specifically reported that As per the decision of RTA,Ernakulam long route buses stop service at Vyttila Mobility Hub .There is no sufficient space for providing a Halt at Edappally By pass

Hence the RTA may peruse the report, file and take a decision.

130

Item No 94 C3/108598/2017/K

Agenda.:- To Consider the application for variation of permit in respect of S/C KL-35-9542 operating on the route Pala - -Via,Bharanamganam, Panackapalam,Erattupetta, Thidanadu ,Pinakkanadu, Kanjirappally As Pala – Edakunnam One Trip Cut from Kanjirappally to Edakunnam[12.00 departure Kanjirappally and 12.40 departure from Edakkunnam]

Applicant:- Sri.Muhammed Rasi,Kochuparambil[H],Erattupetta,Pala

(a) Regular Permit issued on : 01/03/1996 (b) Regular permit valid up to : 28/02/2021 (c) Date of filing application : 26/09/2017

Notes:- S/C KL-35-9542 is covered by regular permit on the route Pala - Edakkunnam- Via,Bharanamganam, Panackapalam,Erattupetta, Thidanadu ,Pinakkanadu, Kanjirappally As Pala – Edakunnam One Trip Cut from Kanjirappally to Edakunnam[12.00 departure Kanjirappally and 12.40 departure from Edakkunnam].But there was several compliant received[including Transport Commissionerate] from the public of Edakkunnam area for this stage carriage does not conducting service at Edakunnam . A detailed enquiry conducted through SRTO,Kanjirappally reveals that the compliant is genuine and Shaw Cause Notice issued to the Permit Holder on 10/10/2017.There was already 3 check report received from SRTO,Kanjirappally for trip curtailment for this stage carriage.

Enquiry conducted trough MVI ,Kanjirappally reveals the following

1. The Stage Carriage Preceding to KL-35-9542 departs Kanjirappally to Edakkunnam at 11.40 hrs and in return it departs Edakkunnam to Kanjirappally at 12.23 hrs and the Stage Carriage succeeding KL-35- 9542 departs Kanjirappally to Edakkunnam at 12.49 hrs and in return it departs Edakkunnam to Kanjirappally at 13.25 hrs. If curtailment /avoiding of trip of Stage Carriage KL-35-9542 departing Kanjirappally to Edakkunnam at 12.00 hrs is allowed, the time gap will increase to 69 minutes [Kanjirappally to Edakkunnam] and 62 minutes[Edakkunnam to Kanjirappally] which are presently 34 minutes & 32 minutes respectively .This will cause undue hardships to the travelling public on Kanjirappally - Edakkunnam sector & they will be compelled to depend other modes of transport such as parallel services. 2. Already there exits several compliant from public of Edakkunnam area that they are facing travelling difficulty due to the unauthorized curtailment of trip of this Stage Carriage& check report have been prepared and submitted in this regard.

Hence the RTA may peruse the report, file and take a decision.

131

Item No 95 C1/104108/2017

Agenda :- To consider the application for surrender of regular permit No 5/2358/2012 respect of S/C KL 05 W 1308 on the route KOMBUKUTHY – PASCHIMA

Applicant:-Sri. SHAMSUDHEEN VELLIPARAMPIL HOUSE, PUTHENCHANTHA ,MUNDAKAYAM , KANJIRAPPALLY Dtd.16/9/2017

Notes :- The permit holder of S/C KL 05 W 1308 on the route KOMBUKUTHY- PASCHIMA Via, MADUKKA, PANACKACHIRA, VARICKANIJUNCTION , MUNDAKAYAM, VANDANPATHAL, AND PASCHIMA has surrendered the regular permit vide No 5/2358/2012 valid up to 02/08/2017 for cancellation. Surrender of Permit without prior intimation was compounded and collected Rs 5000/- vide receipt No C1/104994/2017 dated 16/9/2017, The applicant was heard by secretary RTA on 16/09/2017and accepted the request .

Hence RTA may hear the applicant and take a decision .

132

Item No 96 C1/10497/2017

Agenda :- To consider the application for surrender of regular permit No 5/78/2000 respect of S/C KL 36 345 on the route Karunattuvala-Amritha Hospital on the same via with an extension from Vyttila to Amritha Hospital via halikavattam,Chakkaraparambu,Palarivattam Medical Centre,By pass Jn &

Edapally Bye Pass Jn.

Applicant:-Smt. T.N JAYASREE, MANALIPARAMBIL HOUSE, AENADI P.O, VAIKOM , KOTTAYAM Dtd.27/05/2017

Notes :- The permit holder of S/C KL 36 345 on the route Karunattuvala-Amritha Hospital on the same via with an extension from Vyttila to Amritha Hospital via alikavattam,Chakkaraparambu,Palarivattam Medical Centre,By pass Jn & Edapally Bye Pass Jn. has surrendered the regular permit vide No 5/78/2000 valid up to 19/07/2020 for cancellation. Surrender of Permit without prior intimation was compounded and collected Rs 5000/- vide receipt No C1/104394/2017 dated 15/9/2017, The applicant was heard by secretary RTA on 15/09/2017 and accepted the request .

Hence RTA may hear the applicant and take a decision .

133

Item No 97 C1/10497/2017

Agenda :- To consider the application for surrender of regular permit No 5/14/2017 respect of S/C KL KL 56 F 87 on the route AMBIKAMARKET- PANAMBUKADU

Applicant:-Sri. Shaji P S, PULINTHARA HOUSE, KOTHAVARA P., VAIKOM

Notes :- The permit holder of S/C KL 56 F 87 on the route AMBIKAMARKET- PANAMBUKADU has surrendered the regular permit vide No 5/14/2017 valid up to 02/01/2022 for cancellation. Surrender of Permit without prior intimation was compounded and collected Rs 5000/- vide receipt No C1/92324/2017 dated 11/8/2017.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant and take a decision .

134

Item No 98 C1/116560/2017

Agenda :- To consider the application for surrender of regular permit No 1/1099/2015 respect of S/C KL 02 R 18 on the route KOTHANALLOOR – AYARKUNNAM via, Moozhikkulangara, Onamthuruthu, Munduvelippady, Kottamury, Ettumanoor, Madappadu, and Arumanoor as Ordinary service

Applicant:-Sri. RAJU, THEKKEPARAMBIL HOUSE, ETTUMANOOR ,KOTTAYAM

Notes :- The permit holder of S/C KL 02 R 18 on the route KOTHANALLOOR – AYARKUNNAM via, Moozhikkulangara, Onamthuruthu, Munduvelippady, Kottamury, Ettumanoor, Madappadu, and Arumanoor as Ordinary service has surrendered the regular permit vide No 5/1099/2015 valid up to 11/05/2020 for cancellation. Surrender of Permit without prior intimation was compounded and collected Rs 5000/- vide receipt No C1/ 116554 /2017 dated 19/10/2017. The applicant was heard by secretary RTA on 19/10/2017 and accepted the request .

Hence RTA may hear the applicant and take a decision .

135

Item No 99 C2/12255/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for surrender of regular permit No 5/2220/2015 in respect of S/C KL 37 A 4009 on the route Pala - Thodupuzha.

Applicant:-Managing Director, Akasala Travels & Event Management Pvt Ltd, Uzhavoor, . Dtd 20/10/2017

Notes-

The permit holder of S/C KL 37 A 4009 on the route Pala - Thodupuzha via Eazhacherry, Ramapuram, Kurinji, Vazhithala, Purapuzha, Nediyasala Colony, and Manakkadu Jn has requested to surrender the regular permit vide No 5/2220/2015 valid up to 17/09/2020 for cancellation. Surrender of Permit without prior intimation was compounded and collected Rs.5000/- vide receipt no.5/117445/2017,dated 20/10/2017. The applicant was heard by Secretary, RTA on 19/10/2017 and accepted the request.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant and take a decision.

136

Item No 100 C3/117130/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the application for surrender of regular permit No 5/1060/2016 in respect of S/C KL-10-Y-7847 on the route Ullala – Vaikom .

Applicant:-Sri.Sijodas,Paluviruthil[H],T V Puram,Vaikom . Dtd 20/10/2017

Notes-

The permit holder of S/C KL-10-Y-7847 on the route Punnakkuzhy- Vaikom Via SX College Kothavara, Kottachira, Moothedathukavu, , Painumkal. Poorakkulam, Perichila Jn and Valiyakavala as Ordinary Service has requested to surrender the regular permit vide No 5/1060/2016 valid up to 21/04/2021 for cancellation. Surrender of Permit without prior intimation was compounded and collected Rs.5000/- vide receipt no.5/117130/2017,dated 20/10/2017. The applicant was heard by Secretary, RTA and accepted the request.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant and take a decision.

137

Item No 101 C1/93684/2017/K.

Agenda: 1. To consider the actions taken on the regular permit of S/C KL 05 P 2187 on the route Pala – Kanjirappally for unauthorized change of possession of the vehicle without prior sanction of the RTA [violation of Rule 178 of KMV Rules 1989].

2.To consider the two 4 months temporary permit applications submitted for S/C KL 34 C 7787 & KL 35 F 6766 in place of Stage Carriage KL 05 P 2187 on the route PALA –KANJIRAPPALLY.

3.Consider the two applications submitted for replacement of vehicle with S/C KL 34 C 7787 & KL 35 F 6766 to replace the vehicle KL 05 P 2187.

Applicants 1. Sri. Baby Antos, Parayil House, Edamaruku P.O, PALA [Permit holder of S/C KL 05 P 2187].

2. Sri.K S Shereef, Kunnakkattu house, Erattupetta, Kottayam [Possessor of S/C KL 05 P 2187 by the interim Order of Pala Judicial First Class Magistrate Court. ]

Ref:- 1.Judgement of Honorable STAT in MP NO 724/2017 in MVARP No 122/2017.

2. Judgment in WPC No 27457 of 2017dtd 18/08/2017

Notes:- The regular permit issued to S/C KL 05 P 2187 on the above route is valid up to 03/07/2018. On 15/05/2012, the RTA Kottayam granted Transfer of Permit U/S 82 of MV Act in respect of the above vehicle in to the name of Sri. Jojo Antony, Edackathalackal House, Anakkallu P.O., Kanjirappally, the proposed transferee had not obtained the transfer of permit even after the lapse of long 5 years. It is evident from the file that subsequent to the grant of transfer, the possession of the stage carriage KL 05 P 2187 was transferred to another person by executing agreement between the permit holder and others. But the intention of sale of vehicle and permit was not brought to the notice of the Regional Transport Authority. Hence there is a clear violation of Rule 178 of KMV Rules 1989.

After the transfer possession of the vehicle, the route bus KL 05 P 2187 had not conducted regular service on the route Pala – Kanjirappally. Subsequently, temporary permits were being granted to Sri. K S Shereef, Kunnackattu House, Erattupetta wef. 15/05/2015. As there was an interim order from the Honorable Judicial First Class Majistrate Court Pala, the vehicle KL 05 P 2187 seen possessed by Sri. K S Shereef.

Finally on 13/10/2017, a subsequent temporary permit was granted to Sri. K S Shereef in respect of his vehicle S/C KL 35 F 6766 to operate upto 01/11/2017 in the defaulted vacancy of KL 05 P 2187. The above grant was challenged before the Honorable STAT by the permit holder of the vehicle KL 05 P 2187 Sri. Baby Antose, Parayil House, Edamaruku P O, Pala, vide order in MP NO 724/2017 in MVRP No 122/2017 dtd 09/10/2017, the tribunal directed the Secretary 138

RTA Kottayam to hear the petitioner and the 3rd respondent Sri. K S Shereef in accordance with the principles of natural justice for the grant of temporary permit to the applicant and it is also directed to consider all the contentions raised in this case in the light of Sec 82 of MV Act and Rule 178 of KMV Rules and pass orders in accordance with law.

On perusal of the permit file, it is very well clear that the 20 days temporary permits are being issued to operate in place of S/C KL 05 P 2187 on the route Pala – Kanjirappally Sri. K S Shereef, the registered owner of S/C KL 35 F 6766, was issued with substitute temporary permit in place of above route bus on consideration that he is operating service to cater the need of public on the route Pala – Kanjirappally wef 15/05/2015. In the above period, the permit holder Sri. Baby Antos had not applied for the permit by replacing the S/C KL 05 P 2187 which is possessed by other person as per the Order of Judicial First Class Majistrate Court Pala.

As the petitioner Sri. Baby Antose is the basic permit holder, he has a preferential claim for obtaining STP in place of his defaulted service. Therefore, considering the natural justice reported in the order of Honorable STAT, Sri. Baby Antose is more eligible than Sri. K S Shereef for availing substitute temporary permit in place of S/C KL 05 P 2187. Hence RTA has taken a decision by circulation of file U/R 130 of KMV Rules that to issue temporary permit to Sri. Baby Antos, the permit holder as and when the application made for that purpose. It is also observed that however, the issue related to the transfer of permit and unauthorized change of possession of the vehicle KL 05 P 2187 covered by a valid regular permit without prior sanction of the RTA is clear violation of Rule 178 of KMV Rules 1989. Therefore, the RTA, the authority granted the permit is bound to consider all the contentions with regard to the above violation and take appropriate action on regular permit and its secretary RTA is directed to place the above matter for the consideration of RTA in the very next sitting itself.

It is submitted that the permit holder Sri. Bay Antose and Sri. K S Shereef have applied for temporary permit for 4 months in place of KL 05 P 2187 on the route Pala – Kanjirappally in respect of their vehicles KL 34 C 7787 & KL 35 F 6766 respectively.

It is also submitted that both Baby Antose and K S Shereef have also applied for replacement of vehicle with their on S/Cs KL 34 C 7787 & KL3 5 F 6766 for replacing S/C KL 05 P 2187.

Hence the RTA may peruse the file, judgment, and take a decision.

139

Item No 102 G1/2017/2017/K

Agenda:- To consider the fixation of the age limit for the stage carriages in applying and grant fresh regular stage carriage permits as 8 years for Ordinary stage carriages, 7 years for city / town stage carriages and 5 years for LSOS.

Ref:- Decision of STA dtd 14/06/2017 in vide Departmental Item No 2.

Notes:- STA Thiruvanmthapuram at its sitting dtd 14/06/2017 in vide Departmental Item No 2 took the following decision.

“Perused the Judgment in WP[c] No 23980 of 2015 [V] dated 15/12/2016, heard the counsel for the applicants and objectors and decided to fix the age limit for the stage carriages in applying and grant fresh regular stage carriage permits as follows. a) 8 years for Ordinary stage carriages, b) 7 years for city / town stage carriages c) 5 years for LSOS. However the life span of the stage carriages will be the same as per the earlier decision of the STA ie., 15 years for ordinary, city services and 10 years for LSOS.”

In view of the above decision of the STA Thiruvanamthapuram, RTA may take a decision.

140

Item No 103 G1/8420/2017/K

Agenda:- Implementation of traffic system in Vaikom Town in compliance to the decision taken by RTA Kottayam on 25/07/2017.

Ref:- 1. Order No G1/5326/2001/K dated09-10-2001 of RTA, Kottayam 2. Order No G1/8531/2013/K dated16-11-2013 of RTA, Kottayam 3. Decision taken by Vaikom Traffic Regulatory Committee during 01-06-2016, 21-04-2017, 09-05-2017. 21-06-2017 and 29-06-2017 4. Meeting conducted on 16-06-2017 in the presence of MLA Vaikom 5. Representation from Taluk Residents Association’s Apex Council Vaikom dated 18-08-2016, 4-7-2017 6. Representation from Kottayam District Private Bus operators ssociations Vaikom Unit dated 20-06-2017. 7. Representation from All Kerala Bus operators Forum Kottayam District Unit Vaikom dated 22-06-2017, 7-7-2017 8.WPC No 21514/2017 beofre Hon’ble High Court of Kerala and Interim order dated 30-06-2017. 9.Order No G1/8420/2017/K dtd 25/07/2017 of RTA Kottayam.

Notes:- RTA, Kottayam held on 9-10-2001 approved the Dalavakulam Bus stand at Kizhakkenada, Vaikom. In order to implement some traffic reforms in Vaikom Town and for start functioning of Delavakulam Bus stand, the Traffic regulatory Committee Vaikom submitted recommendations before the RTA held on 16-11-2013 a decision was taken but not implemented. So many decisions were taken by the RTA & Traffic regulatory committee Vaikom in this matter. AT last, the Traffic Regulatory Committee held on 29-06-2017 examined the representations from various organizations and scrutinized the matters relating to the implementation of the traffic reforms as follows.

1. All stage carriages coming from Ernakulam, Kottayam side should proceed through the link road and halt at Dalavakulam stand after alighting passengers in the various stops at Thekke Gopuram, Padinjare Gopuram, Kacherikavala, KSRTC, Valiyakavala. Stage carriages having only passing time shall continue their service from Dalavakulam stand. 2. Stage carriages coming from Vechoor, Alappuzha, Cherthala, Kaipuzhamuttu should operate through Padinjare Gopuram, Kacherikavala Old Stand, Valiyakavala, Link road to Dalavakulam stand and those vehicles having no passing time should continue their service. 3. Stage carriages coming from T.V Puram should operate through Kacherikavala, Old stand Valiyakavala, link road and parking at Dalavakulam stand. Those vehicles having no passing time should continue service with destination board, and others should run one round service for the convenience of passengers. 4. All buses should operate through Dalavakulam Bus stand including KSRTC, Ordinary, FP, SFP and other higher class services. 5. New bus stop is to be considered at Dalavakulam Stand for all classes of KSRTC services. 141

6. No entry is allowed for stage carriages and goods vehicles through link road from south to north. 7. One way system to be insisted between Kacherikavala to Thekke Gopuram except 2&3 wheelers.

RTA Kottayam at its sitting dtd 25/07/2017 took the following decision in vide Order No G1/8420/2017/K. dated 25/07/2017. “Perused the decision taken by Vaikom Traffic Regulatory Committee on 29/06/2017 in detail. Objectors also heard at the time of sitting. It is seen that the proposal are on the basis of various discussions and studies. Considering the urgent necessity of control of traffic in Vaikom Town relating to Dalavakkulam Bus Stand, the proposals accepted and directed to implement with immediate effect. The Chairman Traffic Advisory Committee is also directed to report to the next meeting of the RTA if any variations needed in the proposed system after hearing all the objectors”.

The above decision was communicated to Joint RTO Vaikom and directed to submit report on the direction contained in the decision of RTA. Now Joint RTO Vaikom submitted a report that Chairman of Traffic Regulatory Committee Vaikom was convened a meeting on 12/10/2017 and discussed the matter in detail. There were 14 Participants in the meeting and no new proposals / suggestions were arrived at. RTA may take a decision.

142

Item No. 104 G1/9471/2017 K

Agenda-To consider the request for the sanction of Bus stop for LSOS buses at Shanthi Nagar Bus Stop.

Ref:- Complaint filed by Sri. James Mathew, Palathanathel, Marangattupilli dtd 31/05/2017 before Honorable Chief Minister of Kerala.

Notes- Vide reference cited, Sri. James Mathew filed a complaint dtd 31/05/2017 before Honorable Chief Minister of Kerala that to allow stops for LSOS vehicle at Shanthi Nagar Bus Stop which is situated between Paikkadu and . A detailed enquiry has been conducted through MVI Uzhavoor regarding the matter and he has submitted a detailed report as follows.

1.This bus stop is located in the Vaikom – Pala route between Paikkadu and Marangattupilly.

2.A bus shelter is provided at this location adjacent to the main road and having stop for Ordinary services.

3.Stopping the bus at present condition may cause probability of accident due to insufficient width of the Road for two way traffic.

4.The condition of the road at this location is very Steep with sharp curves and a dangerous spot in view of Road Safety.

5.The distance from the proposed Bus Stop in between the notified Limited Stop Bus Stops Paikkad and Marangattupilly are 1 kms and 1.4 kms respectively to both sides.

6.There is no important offices / institutions located in connection with this Bus Stop.

7.There is no provision to provide a Bus way at present road conditions especially insufficient width and steep with sharp curve.

Considering the above facts, a bus stop for LSOS vehicles is not feasible at this proposed place. Kind attention is invited in an important Road Safety matter also that, the aforementioned Santhinagar Bus Stop is not a sung area on the route and it may cause possibility of accidents and traffic conjunction due to stoppage of further stage carriages. Construction of a bus bay and modern bus waiting shelter is the basic necessity of a new bus stop also. The proposal can be considered in future along with the straitening and widening of the present road only. Also given strict directions to all the Ordinary Service Operators and Crew to avail the Bus Stop facility.

Hence RTA may hear the concerned take a decision 143

Item No. 105 G1/2751/2017 K

Agenda-To consider the request for the sanctioning of stop for LSOS, FSLS buses of KSRTC at Mattappallikkunnu Bus Stop.

Ref:-Minutes of Jilla Vikasana Samithi meeting dtd 27/09/2017 item No 16.

Notes- Vide reference cited, Jilla Vikasana Samithi meeting dtd 27/09/2017 item No 16 has taken a decision to need the needful to sanction bus stops at Mattappallikkunnu for LSOS and FSLS buses especially KSRTC. A detailed enquiry has been conducted through MVI Vaikom regarding the matter and he has submitted a detailed report as follows.

Mattappallikkunnu is situated from 1 km from the eastern side of the Jn. stop and 900 meters from western side of the Avarma Govt. LP School Stop on Vaikom – Thodupuzha Route. Majority of the busses are the Ordinary, LSOS, FSLS and FP of KSRTC. But only ordinary services of KSRTC are stopping at Mattappallikkunnu at present. More over many religious institutions are situating at this place and this highly populated area also. Hence there is much travelling difficulty is existing in this region. Hence recommended that if stops allowed at Mattappallikkunnu for LSOS, FSLS vehicles of KSRTC, will reduces the travelling difficulty of the travelling public of Mattappallikkunnu region.

Hence RTA may hear the concerned take a decision

144

Item No- 106 5/93829/2017

Agenda:-1)To consider the request to condone the delay in submitting the permit renewal application in respect of A/R KL-05-AN-3295.

2) To consider the application for the renewal of permit in respect of A/R KL-05-AN-3295.

Applicant:-Sri. Thomas Chacko, Elampurayidathil, Manganam P O, Kottayam.

Permit valid up to : 15/08/2017

Date of filing application :17/08/2017

Notes:-

A/R KL-05-AN-3295 was covered with a regular permit No-5/1585/2007, valid up to 15/08/2017. On 17/08/2017 the permit holder applied for the renewal of its regular permit for a further period of 5 years from the date of expiry.

Application was belated. Applicant has stated that he could not submit the application in time since he was under treatment and requested to condone delay in filing the application in time. He has produced a medical certificate issued by Dr. S Surendranadh Asst. Surgeon, CHC, THalappady [Reg No 28787]

The vehicle is having HPA and NOC from HP company has been produced. No C/R/LAR is pending. Remitted Rs 2000/- as compounding fee vide Rt No 5/93834/2017 towards permit less operation.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant peruse the file and take a decision.

145

Item No- 107 5/114673/2017

Agenda:-1)To consider the request to condone the delay in submitting the permit renewal application in respect of A/R KL-05-AF-4889.

2) To consider the application for the renewal of permit in respect of A/R KL-05-AF-4889.

Applicant:-Sri. T K Muhammed, Shafeeghar, Nera professional Office, Kodimatha P.O., Kottayam.

Permit valid up to : 06/10/2017

Date of filing application :12/10/2017

Notes:-

A/R KL-05-AF-4889 was covered with a regular permit No-5/513/2002, valid up to 06/10/2017. On 12/10/2017 the permit holder applied for the renewal of its regular permit for a further period of 5 years from the date of expiry.

Application was belated one. Applicant has stated that he could not submit the application in time since he was under treatment and requested to condone delay in filing the application in time. He has produced a medical certificate issued by Dr. Sadakkathulla A MBBS MD, Consulting Physician, KIMS Hospital, Kudamaloor.

The vehicle is not having HPA. No C/R/LAR is pending. Remitted Rs 2000/- as compounding fee vide Rt No 5/114716/2017 towards permit less operation.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant peruse the file and take a decision.

146

Item No- 108 5/57143/2017

Agenda:-1)To consider the request to condone the delay in submitting the permit renewal application in respect of A/R KL-05-AF-6321.

2) To consider the application for the renewal of permit in respect of A/R KL-05-AF-6321.

Applicant:-Sri. Shibu A S, Kalthiparambil, Puthuppally, Kottayam.

Permit valid up to : 26/03/2017

Date of filing application :18/05/2017

Notes:-

A/R KL-05-AF-6321 was covered with a regular permit No-5/89/2002, valid up to 26/03/2017. On 18/05/2017 the permit holder applied for the renewal of its regular permit for a further period of 5 years from the date of expiry.

Application was belated one. Applicant has stated that he could not submit the application in time since he was under treatment and requested to condone delay in filing the application in time. He has produced a medical certificate issued by Dr. Sreekesh B S, MBBS, D Ortho, Jr. Consultant District Hospital, Kottayam.

The vehicle is not having HPA. No C/R/LAR is pending. Remitted Rs 2000/- as compounding fee vide Rt No 5/57146/2017 towards permit less operation.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant peruse the file and take a decision.

147

Item No- 109 5/114527/2017

Agenda:-1)To consider the request to condone the delay in submitting the permit renewal application in respect of A/R KL-05-AB-9968.

2) To consider the application for the renewal of permit in respect of A/R KL-05-AB-9968.

Applicant:-Sri. Jayan, Chira, Karappuzha P O, Kottayam.

Permit valid up to : 05/09/2017

Date of filing application :12/10/2017

Notes:-

A/R KL-05-AB-9968 was covered with a regular permit No-5/1638/2007, valid up to 05/09/2017. On 12/10/2017 the permit holder applied for the renewal of its regular permit for a further period of 5 years from the date of expiry.

Application was belated one. Applicant has stated that he could not submit the application in time since he was under treatment and requested to condone delay in filing the application in time. He has produced a medical certificate issued by Dr. P K Neelakandan, MBBS, Reg No 9427, Modern Medicine, Kangazha.

The vehicle is not having HPA. No C/R/LAR is pending. Remitted Rs 2000/- as compounding fee vide Rt No 5/114539/2017 towards permit less operation.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant peruse the file and take a decision.

148

Item No- 110 5/116726/2017

Agenda:-1)To consider the request to condone the delay in submitting the permit renewal application in respect of A/R KL-05-AD-9709.

2) To consider the application for the renewal of permit in respect of A/R KL-05-AD-9709.

Applicant:-Sri. Jaimon, Chirakkal Veettil, Villoonni P O, Arpookara, Kottayam.

Permit valid up to : 25/12/2016

Date of filing application :13/11/2017

Notes:-

A/R KL-05-AD-9709 was covered with a regular permit No-5/100412/2006, valid up to 25/12/2016. On 13/11/2017 the permit holder applied for the renewal of its regular permit for a further period of 5 years from the date of expiry.

Application was belated one. Applicant has stated that he could not submit the application in time since he was under treatment and requested to condone delay in filing the application in time. He has produced a medical certificate issued by Dr. S Surendranath, Asst. Surgeon, G H Changanacherry, Reg. No 28787.

The vehicle is not having HPA. No C/R/LAR is pending. Remitted Rs 4000/- as compounding fee vide Rt No 5/126721/2017 towards permit less & CF less operation.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant peruse the file and take a decision.

149

Item No- 111 5/125915/2017

Agenda:-1)To consider the request to condone the delay in submitting the permit renewal application in respect of A/R KL-05-AC-8965.

2) To consider the application for the renewal of permit in respect of A/R KL-05-AC-8965.

Applicant:-Sri. Mohandas, Malayattil, Muppaikkadu, Nattakom, Kottayam.

Permit valid up to : 11/09/2016

Date of filing application :10/11/2017

Notes:-

A/R KL-05-AC-8965 was covered with a regular permit No-5/100319/2001, valid up to 11/09/2016. On 10/11/2017 the permit holder applied for the renewal of its regular permit for a further period of 5 years from the date of expiry.

Application was belated one. Applicant has stated that he could not submit the application in time since he was under treatment and requested to condone delay in filing the application in time. He has produced a medical certificate issued by Dr. Jayakrishnan G, Sree Parthasarathy Ayurvedic Centre, Moolavattom P O, Kottayam.

The vehicle is not having HPA. No C/R/LAR is pending. Remitted Rs 4000/- as compounding fee vide Rt No 5/125916/2017 towards permit less & CF less operation.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant peruse the file and take a decision.

150

Item No- 112 5/125915/2017

Agenda:-1)To consider the request to condone the delay in submitting the permit renewal application in respect of A/R KL-05-AL-8992.

2) To consider the application for the renewal of permit in respect of A/R KL-05-AL-8992.

Applicant:-Sri. Roy K Thomas, Mazhuvancheril, Ambalakadavu, Karappuzha P O, Kottayam.

Permit valid up to : 10/09/2017

Date of filing application :19/09/2017

Notes:-

A/R KL-05-AL-8992 was covered with a regular permit No-5/1214/2007, valid up to 10/09/2017. On 19/09/2017 the permit holder applied for the renewal of its regular permit for a further period of 5 years from the date of expiry.

Application was belated one. Applicant has stated that he could not submit the application in time since he was under treatment and requested to condone delay in filing the application in time. He has produced a medical certificate issued by Dr. George Cherian, MBBS, Reg No 6589 [TCMC] Kurisupally Medical Mission, Puthanangady, Kottayam.

The vehicle is not having HPA. No C/R/LAR is pending. Remitted Rs 4000/- as compounding fee vide Rt No 5/125916/2017 towards permit less & CF less operation.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant peruse the file and take a decision.

151

Item No- 113 5/112187/2017

Agenda:-1)To consider the request to condone the delay in submitting the permit renewal application in respect of A/R KL-05-D-2668.

2.To consider the application for the renewal of permit in respect of A/R KL-05-D-2668.

3.To consider the application for transfer of permit & Ownership [Death] in respect of A/R KL- 05-D-2668.

Applicant:-Sri. Selvaraj K, Edoor House, Veloor P O, Kottayam.[Legal heir of the permit holder]

Permit valid up to : 10/10/2017

Date of filing application : 06/10/2017

Notes:-

A/R KL-05-D-2668 was covered with a regular permit No-5/1991/2007, valid up to 10/10/2017. On 06/09/2017 the legal heir has applied for the renewal of its regular permit for a further period of 5 years from the date of expiry, transfer of permit & Ownership [Death] state that his father Sri. Krishnan Chettyar expired on 07/01/2017. [Death Certificate issued by the Registrar, Births & Deaths Kottayam Municipality]

Family member ship certificate issued by the Village Officer, Veloor Village Office dtd 22/09/2017 states that the following persons are the legal heirs of the deceased Krishnan Chettiyar.

Name Relationship with the Age expired Selvaraj K Son 50 Raju K Son 48 Santhamma Daughter 55 Subbammal Wife 74

All the legal heirs are appeared before me and stated that they have no objection to transfer the permit & Ownership of KL-05-D-2668 to the name of Sri. Selvaraj K. Application was belated one. Applicant has stated that he could not submit the application in time since he was under treatment and requested to condone delay in filing the application in time.

The vehicle is not having HPA. No C/R/LAR is pending.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant peruse the file and take a decision.

152

Item No – 114

Erratum 01. To correct the applicant’s name in Item No 81.

02. To correct the distance of overlapping mentioned in the notes of Item No 85.

Item No-115

Any other item permitted by the Chairman, RTA

153

Item No. 81 C1/116445/2016/K

Agenda:1.To peruse the Judgment in WPC No 17202 of 2017 dtd 11/8/2017.

2. To reconsider the application for renewal of regular permit in respect of S/C KL 05 M 3479 on the route KNJIRAM JETTY - KOTTAYAM Via ILLICKAL, MANIKUNNAM AND KARAPUZHA.

Applicant:-Sri. K A Shareef, Bahira Manzil, Kiliroor North, Illickal, Kottayam.

(a) Regular Permit valid up to :10/11/2016[ Pt No.5/3397/2011] (b) Date of filing application : 15/10/2016 (c) TP U/S 87 [i][d] valid up to : 30/11/2017 (d) Registration validity up t o :30/07/2017

Notes:- The permit holder of S/C.KL 05 M 3479on the route KNJIRAM JETTY-KOTTAYAM Via ILLICKAL,MANIKUNNAM AND KARAPUZHA has applied for the renewal of regular permit for a period of 5 years from the date of expiry of the permit. Regular permit valid up to 10/11/2016. The route portion lies in Kottayam district.

The application was placed before the RTA held on 02/02/2017 and since the permit is issued after 9/05/2006 and route portion from Pulimood Junction to Gandhisquare 100mts lies in Thiruvananthapuram –Kottayam scheme and from Seematty round to Gomathy pump 400 mts lies in Ernakulam – Thekkady and Kottayam – Thekkadky scheme , which violates GO[P] No 42/2009 dtd 14/7/2009.Hence the application for the renewal of regular permit is rejected .Now the permit holder produced Judgment in WPC No 17202 of 2017 dtd . 11/8/2017 in which it is directed to renew the permit in accordance with law as is sought for in the application at the earliest . The permit holder also submitted application for replacement with a later model stage carriage with registration mark KL 06 C 9854 since the registration validity of the vehicle KL 05 M 3479 expired on 30/07/2017 .Now the vehicle is under Form G from the period And Temporary permit issued in the vacancy of the route bus up to 30/11/2017

The enquiry report of MVI Kottayam, reveals the following facts

1.Total distance of the route :8KMkms 2.Intra/Inter district route : Intra district.

3Details of Overlapping :a)From Pulimood Junction to Gandhisquare 100 mts lies in Thiruvananthapuram –Kottayam scheme

b)Seematty round to Gomathy Pump 400 mts lies 154

in Ernakulam – Thekkady and Kottayam- Thekkady scheme 5. Details of HPA and NOC from :Nil. finance company : 6. Court direction if any : Judgment in WPC No 17202 of 2017 dtd . 11/8/2017 in which it is directed to renew the permit in accordance with law as is sought for in the application at the earliest .

7. Other relevant points : This permit is issued after 14/07/2009.

Hence RTA may hear the applicant peruse the file and take a decision in this matter

155

Item No. 85 C2/62800/2017/K

Agenda: To consider the application for renewal of permit in respect of leased S/C KL 35 B 4025 on the route Kodungoor - Cherthala via, Pallickathodu, Poovathilappu, Ayarkkunnam, Ettumanoor, Athirampuzha Market Jun, University, Attukaran Kavala, Pravattom Jun, Neendoor, Kallara, Perumthuruth, Edayazham, Bund Road & Thanneer Mukkam as ordinary service for a further period of 5 years from the date of expiry.[permit issued after 14/07/2009 ie, on 19/10/2012]

Applicant - Smt. Philip C Jhon, S/o John, Chiraykkal house, Lakkattoor North, Lakkattoor P O, Kooroppada, Kottayam

(a) Regular Permit valid up to 18/10/2017

(b) Temporary Permit valid up to 18/02/2018

(c) Date of filing application : 10/05/2017

Notes: Leased S/C KL 35 B 4025 conducts regular stage carriage service on the route Kodungoor - Cherthala via, Pallickathodu, Poovathilappu, Ayarkkunnam, Ettumanoor, Athirampuzha Market Jun, University, Attukaran Kavala, Pravattom Jun, Neendoor , Kallara, Perumthuruth, Edayazham, Bund Road & Thanneer Mukkam on the strength of regular pemit valid upto 18/10/2017. The permit holder has applied for renewal of regular permit for a further period of 5 years from the date of expiry.

The regular permit was granted by RTA at its sitting on 22/05/2012 in compliance with the judgment in M V A A 22/2012 which was stated as follows. “When it has already been found that the overlapping from Pravattom to Neendoor is mere inevitable intersection, the authority below [RTA,Kottayam] ought not to have rejected the application in case there is no other overlapping over any other sector. In the impugned order also the authority below has no case that there is overlapping over any sector other than from Pravattom to Neendoor. Matters being so, the impugned order [Order No.G1/1385/2011/K, Dated 23/11/11, of RTA,Kottayam – the fresh permit application was rejected] is liable to be set aside.

In the result, this appeal is allowed, and the impugned order is set aside, and the authority below [RTA,Kottayam] is directed to grant the fresh regular permit sought for, subject to the settlement of timings.”

Details of the route as follows.

156

1.Total distance of the route :58.5 kms.

2.Intra/Inter district route : Inter district. [ -8 kms &

Kottayam District -50.5 kms

3.Details of concurrence : N.A.

4.Details of Overlapping : Konikkal Jn - Ettumanoor - 0.7 kms. [Kottayam – Kattappana Scheme] Pravattom Jn. – Neendoor - 1.6 kms. [Kottayam – Neendoor Scheme] KSRTC Cherthala – Boys School Jun -0.2 kms [Trivandrum – Kannur Scheme] Irumpupalam Jun. – Court Junction-0.15 kms

Total overlapping is 2.65 kms which is 4.52 % of the total route length of 58.5 kms.

5. Details of HPA and NOC from

finance company : Nil.

6. Court direction if any : Nil

7. Other relevant points : This permit is issued after 14/07/2009 ie issued

on 19/10/2012.

Hence, RTA may hear the applicant, peruse the file and take a decision.