Human Security and Globalization

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Human Security and Globalization プール学院大学研究紀要 第54号 2013年,63~76 Human Security and Globalization KAMEI Keiji 1.Introduction 䠍䠊䠍䚷㻴㼡㼙㼍㼚㻌㻿㼑㼏㼡㼞㼕㼠㼥㻌㼣㼕㼠㼔㻌㼚㼛㼞㼙㼍㼠㼕㼢㼑㻌㼍㼚㼐㻌㼑㼙㼜㼕㼞㼕㼏㼍㼘㻌㼞㼑㼍㼟㼛㼚㼕㼚㼓㼟 Human security is a normative, ethical movement and it also rests upon empirical reasoning. Firstly, it is normative in the sense that it argues that there is an ethical responsibility to reorient security around the individual in a redistributive sense, in the context of changes in political community and the emergence of transnational norms relating to human rights. Those who have the capacity to extend security to people seriously lacking in security have a basic human obligation to do so. Secondly, it rests upon empirical reasoning regarding the foundations of stability within and between states. There is a widely held understanding that human security deprivation, such as socioeconomic deprivation and exclusion, abuses of human rights, and widespread epidemiological threats such as AIDS, has a direct impact upon peace and stability within and between states. As such, it seems in the general interests to address human security needs and build capacity for others to address theirs, in line with the interconnected peace and stability(Newman, 2001). 䠍䠊䠎䚷㼀㼞㼍㼐㼕㼠㼕㼛㼚㼍㼘㻌㻿㼑㼏㼡㼞㼕㼠㼥㻌㼠㼛㻌㻴㼡㼙㼍㼚㻌㻿㼑㼏㼡㼞㼕㼠㼥 International security has traditionally been defined as a military defense of territory. The context is an anarchic state system whose chief characteristic is a fierce competition for security based upon, primarily military, powers. In international relation theory, this is a structural realism, that is, though unit level changes may occur inside states, the system remains an anarchic and hierarchical arena that conditions or even determines the behaviors and attitudes of the units(Waltz, 2001). National security is therefore the imperative of defending territory against and deterring foreign military threats. Attitude and institutions that privilege state politics above disease, hunger, or illiteracy, are still embedded in international relations and 64 プール学院大学研究紀要第54号 foreign policy making. Yet for most people in the world, the much greater threats to security come from disease, hunger, environmental contamination, street crime, or even domestic violence.1) And for others a greater threat may come from their own state itself, rather than from foreign adversary. These facts suggest that an international security traditionally defined, such as territorial defense, does not necessarily correlate with human security, and that an overemphasis upon statist security can be to the detriment of human welfare needs. Although this is not to presume that human security is necessarily in conflict with state as an aggregation of capacity and resources and the central provider of security in the traditional security thinking, naïve cases which necessitate human security or human insecurity consideration has been gradually attracting greater attention. 䠍䠊䠏䚷㻵㼙㼜㼍㼏㼠㻌㼛㼒㻌㻳㼘㼛㼎㼍㼘㼕㼦㼍㼠㼕㼛㼚 Globalization is fundamental to this changing context. Globalization generally refers to the deregulation and marketization of national economies in the context of networks of international rules and standards that are codified and upheld, and even enforced, by regional and global organizations and regimes. The process of“complex interdependence” (Keohane and Nye, 1977)has arguably deepened, and with it the management of public goods such as trade and security. Most governments would accept, although in varying degrees, that the environment, the international economy, peace and security, population, the spread of disease, narcotics, terrorism, development, and civil conflicts are issues that demand serious policy consideration(Kamei, 2012). This agenda overlaps with the emergence of Human Security concepts, and the broader alternative security discourse. This study focuses on the now controversially debated concept of Human Security in the subject of International Security Studies, and digs into how it has been formulated, and explores to where it has been heading while struggling to establish as a solid concept under the fast- moving international situations due to globalization. 2.Peace Studies and Human Security 䠎䠊䠍䚷㻺㼑㼓㼍㼠㼕㼢㼑㻌㼍㼚㼐㻌㻼㼛㼟㼕㼠㼕㼢㼑㻌㻼㼑㼍㼏㼑 Although the term human security has been widely known and utilized at least within the developmental circles such as International Non-Governmental Organizations(INGO)and various UN agencies today, the concept of human security has began to be recognized only a Human Security and Globalization 65 few decades ago. In the age of fiercely confronted Cold War, the Strategic Studies which particularly focusing on the arms reduction and detent between eastern and western countries has positioned in the center stage in the Security Studies. In the meantime, reflecting the disaster of WWII, researches focusing on the concept of‘peace’had been introduced into the area of International Security Studies and subsequently had been formulated as Peace Studies. Peace Studies originally launched as criticism of then-dominant Strategic Studies, such as peace research branch of arms control. Therefore, for meantime, it was still an approach to security that focused on security’s military dimensions and on external threats. Researchers belonged to this, envisaged bipolarity as a structure that could be eased but not eradicated. Other branches of Peace Studies, however, began to take a more radical approach, analytically as well as politically, arguing that governments on both sides of the Iron Curtain held their populations, and the planet, hostages to nuclear disaster. This constituted‘humanity’ or the individual as the referent object rather than the state, thereby invoking the long-standing Liberal tradition of critically scrutinizing the relationship between citizens and the institutions of authority and sovereignty. As to the main research concept, Peace studies’researchers of the 1960’s and 1970s did not apply the concept of security in launching their critique of Strategic Studies but went through the oppositional concept of‘peace’. Peace researchers further divided‘peace’into positive and negative peace(Hansen and Buzan, 2009). Negative peace was defined as the absence of war, large scale physical violence or personal violence and opened up a research agenda on military security. The research logic for this group was mainly driven by a desire to lower the statistical probability of nuclear weapons being used.2) This line of thinking has close connections to nuclear disarmament, and the NPT bargain in which stopping the spread of nuclear weapons should be accompanied by efforts to eliminate those already in existence. Positive peace studies, in contrast, had a multiple connotations. In the 1950s and 1960s, it was defined as the integration of individual security, but towards the end of 1960s, it was reformulated to include‘structural violence’, which emphasized social injustice and inequality.3) 䠎䠊䠎䚷㻼㼑㼍㼏㼑㻌㻿㼠㼡㼐㼕㼑㼟㻌㼍㼟㻌㼍㻌㼒㼛㼞㼑㼞㼡㼚㼚㼑㼞 The conceptualization of positive peace was worked through Galtung’s seminal article on structural violence, defined as‘the distance between the potential and the actual, and that 66 プール学院大学研究紀要第54号 which impedes the decrease of this distance’(Galtung, 1969). Structural violence referred to manifest injustices with physical material consequences, for instance hunger-related deaths in the Third World, but also to phenomena with a less immediate bodily impact such as illiteracy (Galtung, 1969). The referent object in Galtung’s conceptualization of structural violence was thus human collectivities, neither states nor individuals, and the primary concerns include economic and societal issues. During the 1980s there is a gradual shift from‘peace’to‘security’as the guiding concept of approaches critical of the Strategic Studies mainstream. Gleditsch notes in 1989 that‘most authors avoid the word peace, possibly because it sounds too grand and pretentious(Gleditsch, 1989). At the close of the 1980s, as the Cold War confrontation began to cease, it seems that the status of‘security’has been upgraded from underdeveloped to the conceptual common ground between Strategic Studies and Peace Studies(Buzan, 1984). Aside from academic debates, there were several movements paving the way to the formulation of human security, or individual security. The most successful one was the concept of‘common security’, or‘comprehensive security’in the Japanese case. The underlying assumption of Common Security was that‘the main threats to international security come not from individual states but from global problems shared by the entire international community such as nuclear war, the heavy economic burden of militarism and war, disparities in living standards within and among nations, and global environmental degradation’(Porter and Brown, 1991). In retrospect, this concept, which rather focusing on the furtherance of human rights was the forerunner to the concept of Human Security. 䠎䠊䠏䚷㻵㼚㼠㼞㼛㼐㼡㼏㼠㼕㼛㼚㻌㼛㼒㻌㻴㼡㼙㼍㼚㻌㻿㼑㼏㼡㼞㼕㼠㼥 After many twists and turns described above, the term‘Human Security’had began to appear in the policy statements published by the UN in the 1990s. In particular, the UNDP’s Human Development Report in 1994 describes Human Security explicitly as a condition where people given relief from the traumas that besiege human development. According to UNDP, Human Security means, first, safety from such chronic threats as hunger, disease, and repression. And second, it means protection from sudden and hurtful disruptions in the patterns of daily life, whether in homes, in jobs, or in communities(UNDP
Recommended publications
  • Globalization, Human Security and Some Intervening Concerns
    European Scientific Journal August 2014 /SPECIAL/ edition ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 GLOBALIZATION, HUMAN SECURITY AND SOME INTERVENING CONCERNS Olufemi Oludimu PhD Social Sciences Department (Economics Unit), Crawford University, Igbesa, Ogun State, Nigeria Abstract Traditionally the concept of “security” has been couched in neo-realist terms, relating to protecting the territorial integrity and political sovereignty of nations. This continues to be a legitimate concern for scholars and policy-makers alike, but at the current state of human development it is clear that an alternative or even complimentary conception of “security” needs to assume critical importance. A conceptualization of security that is centered primarily on the individual or community can be understood as human security. This notion grows from the assumption that there are needs, problems, and issues that are common to all of mankind no matter what part of the world they live in, for example, poverty; the spread of communicable diseases; environmental degradation; the loss of faith in institutions; population pressures; and economic crisis. It is imperative that we view these concerns in terms of global trends and forces that affect the individual. The question then is ; how can we ensure human security? This can be achieved not through force of arms, but through policies that lead to the empowerment of people and an attack on the sources of intervening concerns and contemporary problems as such poverty,migration and income inequality challenges. These issues form the kernel of the present paper. In concluding, the paper proffers suggestions by way of some reversal policies that can mitigate some of the challenges identified so as to ensure improved human security on the global plane.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Empowerment in the Context of Human Security: a Discussion Paper by Beth Woroniuk
    WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF HUMAN SECURITY 7-8 December 1999, ESCAP, Bangkok, Thailand UN ACC Inter-Agency Committee OECD/DAC Working Party On Women and Gender Equality on Gender Equality Office of the Special Adviser on Gender Issues and Advancement of Women Department of Economic and Social Affairs {PAGE } TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Foreword 2. Final Communiqué 3. Executive Summary 4. Introductory statements Adrianus Mooy, Under-Secretary General, Executive Secretary, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific Angela E.V. King, Chairperson, ACC Inter-agency Committee on Women and Gender Equality Diana Rivington, Chairperson, OECD/DAC Working Party on Gender Equality, Director, Gender Equality Division Policy Branch, Canadian International Development Agency 5. Women’s Empowerment in the Context of Human Security Discussion paper prepared by Ms. Beth Woroniuck 6. Commentary, Ms. Shanti Dairiam, IWRAW, Asia and the Pacific 7. ANNEXES a. Annex I Programme of Work b. Annex II Framework forWorking Group Sessions c. Annex III List of Participants {PAGE } FOREWORD In the ten months since the joint InterAgency Committee on Women and Gender Equality- OECD/DAC Working Party on Women and Gender Equality Workshop on “Women’s Empowerment in the Context of Human Security” was convened, there have been several crucial developments which have expanded our understanding of the concept of human security. On 8 March 2000, International Women’s Day, the United Nations Security Council issued a Statement recognizing that peace is inextricably linked with equality between women and men. The Statement also affirmed that the equal access and full participation of women in power structures and their full involvement in all efforts for the prevention and resolution of conflicts are essential for the maintenance and promotion of peace and security.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Security and Public Health
    Editorial I am pleased to present this special issue of the Pan American Journal of Public Human security Health/Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, dedicated to the topic of human and public health security within the context of public health. Human security and its relation- ship with health, social determinants, the Millennium Development Goals, and human rights are inseparable concepts that need to be understood in greater Mirta Roses Periago1 depth by public health researchers and practitioners as well as policymakers at all levels of government. Human security is an emerging paradigm for understanding global vulnerabilities that has evolved over the past two decades from being a tradi- tional notion of national security with heavy investments in military prepared- ness and response to focusing more on the dimensions that sustain the security of people through investing in human and community development. Today, the human security paradigm maintains that a people-centered view of security is vitally essential for national, regional, and global stability. The concept’s dimensions were first presented in the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) Human Development Report 1994 (1)—considered a milestone publication in the field of human security—which put forth the criti- cal proposal that ensuring “freedom from want” and “freedom from fear” for all persons is the best path to tackle the problem of global insecurity. The UNDP devoted a chapter of the report to the need to shift the paradigm from state-centered security to people-centered security; from nuclear security to human security. The chapter on the new dimensions of human security states: The concept of security has for too long been interpreted nar- rowly as security of territory from external aggression, or as protection of national interests in foreign policy, or as global security from the threat of a nuclear holocaust.
    [Show full text]
  • Disability, Poverty and Food Sovereignty: Advancing the Human Security Agenda Vanmala Hiranandani, Ph.D
    Disability, Poverty and Food Sovereignty: Advancing the Human Security Agenda Vanmala Hiranandani, Ph.D. Dalhousie University, Canada Abstract: This essay furthers the human security discourse using the lenses of disability and food studies. The human security agenda must embrace the principle of food sovereignty that counteracts neo-liberal notions on food security. Since poverty, food insecurity, and disability are manifestations of similar development processes, horizontal alliances are imperative for systemic change. Key Words: human security, food sovereignty, poverty Introduction Food is one of the vital elements of human existence. Food consumption is the single most important determinant of good health (WHO, 1998). It is pivotal to human security, which has been defined as: “Protect[ing] the vital core of all human lives in ways that enhance human freedoms and human fulfillment. Human security…means protecting people from critical and pervasive threats and situations…It means creating political, social, environmental, economic, military and cultural systems that together give people the building blocks of survival, livelihood and dignity” (Commission on Human Security, 2003, p. 4). Human security is thus broadly understood as freedom from fear and want, and as protecting and empowering the world’s most vulnerable people – it encompasses safety from chronic threats, such as hunger, disease and political repression, and protection from sudden and hurtful disruptions, such as war and violence. Attaining food security is viewed as crucial for ensuring safety from both chronic threats and sudden disruptions (Stoett, 2000; Yoshikawa, 2007). However, several decades of research and efforts to achieve food security have been unsuccessful in finding sustainable solutions to hunger around the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Security: Implications for Public Health
    © PAHO-WHO KMC/IB-GC July 20, 2012 - H & H S Human Security: Implications for Public Health Technical Reference Document Sustainable Development and Environmental Health Area (SDE) PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION Pan American Sanitary Bureau, Regional Office for the Americas of the WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION 525 Twenty-third Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037 2012 Also published in Spanish (2012) as: Seguridad humana: implicaciones para la salud pública. Documento técnico de referencia ISBN: 978-92-75-31692-4 PAHO HQ Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Pan American Health Organization Human security: Implications for public health Washington, D.C.: PAHO © 2012 ISBN: 978-92-75-11692-0 I. Title 1. CIVIL PROTECTION 2. SAFETY 3. SAFETY MANAGEMENT 4. DISASTER MANAGEMENT 5. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 6. HUMAN RIGHTS 7. PUBLIC HEALTH NLM WA 250 The Pan American Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. Applications and inquiries should be addressed to Editorial Services, Area of Knowledge Management and Communications (KMC), Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. The Area of Sustainable Development and Environmental Health (SDE) will be glad to provide the latest information on any changes made to the text, plans for new editions, and reprints and translations already available. © Pan American Health Organization, 2012. All rights reserved. Publications of the Pan American Health Organization enjoy copyright protection in accordance with the provisions of Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. All rights are reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the Pan American Health Organization concerning the status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Solutions for Human Security and Anti-Corruption: Integrating Theories and Practices Marco Tavanti University of San Francisco, [email protected]
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Public and Nonprofit Administration School of Management 2013 Sustainable Solutions for Human Security and Anti-Corruption: Integrating Theories and Practices Marco Tavanti University of San Francisco, [email protected] A Stachowicz-Stanusch Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.usfca.edu/pna Part of the Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons Recommended Citation Tavanti, M. & Stachowicz-Stanusch, A. Sustainable Solutions for Human Security and Anti-Corruption: Integrating Theories and Practices. International Journal of Sustainable Human Security (IJSHS), Vol. 1 (December) 2013: 1-17. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Management at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Public and Nonprofit Administration by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE HUMAN SECURITY 1 Sustainable Solutions for Human Security and Anti-Corruption: Integrating Theories and Practices Marco Tavanti Agata Stachowicz-Stanusch Abstract: Corruption is a real issue affecting the understanding and practices promoting human security. This article introduces the frameworks of sustainable human security in relation to anti- corruption. Human security is explored in its historical evolution and the more recent expansion of its frameworks, including the sustainability and systemic elements. The notion of sustainable human security is examined in relation to corruption and anti-corruption, as expressed in the current challenges and opportunities on sustainable development and human international development.
    [Show full text]
  • New Threats to Human Security in the Era of Globalization*
    Journal of Human Development Vol. 4, No. 2, July 2003 New Threats to Human Security in the Era of Globalization* SAKIKO FUKUDA-PARR Sakiko Fukuda-Parr is Director, Human Development Report Office, United Nations Development Programme Abstract This paper makes a case for analysing the new insecurities introduced or worsened by globalization from a human security perspective. The author examines the ways in which globalization is changing the word — economically, politically, and in terms of information and communications technology — and then reviews the new insecurities that require policy attention. The paper specifically tackles the issues of global crime, trafficking in humans, instability in financial markets, threats to job security, the spread of disease and internal conflicts. Key words: Globalization, Human Security, Human Development, Poverty, Inequality, Human Rights, Crime, Human Trafficking, Conflict, Crisis Introduction The last decade of the twentieth century has been a historic period of rapid and dramatic changes in the world. Many of these changes are part of the process of ‘globalization’. This paper argues that the concept of human security can offer a useful perspective for assessing policy priorities to make globalization better for people, adding value to existing perspectives such as poverty, inequality, human rights and conflict resolution and prevention. The human security concept differs from these other perspectives by focusing more sharply on the ‘downside risks’ that can threaten the well- being of all people, both affluent and poor. Furthermore, it focuses on the well-being and dignity of people rather than on the protection of national borders. It also offers a more complete set of criteria for assessing the impact of globalization on human well-being, encompassing as it does socio- economic aspects and personal safety from the consequences of violent conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Security and the Sdgs
    Human Security and Agenda 2030 O T E C T I O P R N PEOPLE CENTRED PREVENTION SDGs COMPREHENSIVE ORIENTED CONTEXT SPECIFIC E T M P N O W E R M E Echoing human security principles, the 2030 Agenda emphasizes a “world free of poverty, hunger, disease and want … free of fear and violence … with equitable and universal access to quality education, health care and social protection … to safe drinking water and sanitation … where food is sufficient, safe, affordable and nutritious … where habitats are safe, resilient and sustainable … and where there is universal access to affordable, reliable and sustainable energy”. It calls for development strategies that result in more resilient societies where people are safe from chronic threats such as abject poverty, hunger, disease, violence and repression, and protected from sudden and hurtful disruptions in their daily lives. Based on a wealth of experiences in over 90 countries, the application of human security can significantly enhance actions taken by the global community, Member States, civil society and United Nations entities to fully realize the transformative promise of Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Setting priorities, Linking peace and achieving integration sustainable development Human security is grounded in the fundamental recognition Progress on the Millennium Development Goals proved slowest of the differing capacities, needs and circumstances of in fragile and conflict-affected countries. Where violence is people, civil society and Governments. It seeks to establish rife, and trust in people and institutions is lacking, development participatory solutions that protect and empower all people. that fails to address the structural and behavioural causes By being comprehensive and by drawing together all the of violence often falls short of preventing a relapse into actors necessary to respond to a challenge, the application crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Health, Resilience, and Human Security: Moving Toward Health for All
    HEALTH, RESILIENCE, AND HUMAN SECURITY: MOVING TOWARD HEALTH FOR ALL Marcelo Korc, Susan Hubbard, Tomoko Suzuki, and Masamine Jimba Copyright © 2016 Japan Center for International Exchange and Pan American Health Organization All rights reserved. Printed in the United States. ISBN:978-4-88907-147-4 Copyediting by Kimberly Gould Ashizawa. Cover design and typesetting by Patrick Ishiyama. Cover photographs by kovgabor / Shutterstock.com, Franco Volpato / Shutterstock.com, and Nguyen Anh Tuan / Shutterstock.com. Publication is available on the JCIE/USA website (www.jcie.org) and the PAHO website (www.paho.org). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate this publication should be addressed to JCIE/USA, 135 West 29th Street, Suite 303, New York, NY 10001 USA, or to the Communication Department (CMU), Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA (www.paho.org/publications/copyright-forms). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Japan Center for International Exchange and/or the Pan American Health Organization concern- ing the legal status of any country, territory, city, or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the Japan Center for International Exchange and/or the Pan American Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distin- guished by initial capital letters.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Security Handbook
    HUMAN SECURITY HANDBOOK An integrated approach for the realization of the Sustainable Development Goals and the priority areas of the international community and the United Nations system Human Security Unit · United Nations · January 2016 1 CONTENTS Acronyms . 3 Introduction . 4 The Human Security Approach and Its Added Value . 5 Towards a Stronger Response by the United Nations System . 11 Application of the Human Security Approach to Programmes and National Plans . 17 Annex 1 - Designing a Human Security Programme: A Case Study from Kenya . 30 Annex 2 - Examples of Programmes Funded by the United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security . 40 2 ACRONYMS FAO Food and Agriculture Organization ILO International Labour Organization MDGs Millennium Development Goals NGO Non-governmental organization SDGs Sustainable Development Goals UNESCO United Nations Economic, Scientific and Cultural Organization UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNFPA United Nations Population Fund UN Habitat United Nations Human Settlements Programme UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund UNIDO United Industrial Development Organization UNTFHS United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security UNV United Nations Volunteers UN Women United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women WHO World Health Organization 3 INTRODUCTION Prepared as a guide for practitioners and policymakers who plan to integrate the human security approach into their work, this handbook provides an overview of the principles that embody the approach and its added value. It introduces a step-by-step analytical process for the design and im- plementation of human security initiatives, and provides guidance for assessing the added value of the approach.
    [Show full text]
  • The Globalization of Insecurity: How the International Economic Order Undermines Human and National Security on a World Scale
    HAOL, Núm. 5 (Otoño, 2004), 113-126 ISSN 1696-2060 THE GLOBALIZATION OF INSECURITY: HOW THE INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC ORDER UNDERMINES HUMAN AND NATIONAL SECURITY ON A WORLD SCALE Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed Institute for Policy Research & Development, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected] Recibido: 15 Julio 2004 / Revisado: 13 Agosto 2004 / Aceptado: 15 Septiembre 2004 / Publicado: 15 Octubre 2004 Resumen: National and human security has throughout the world, largely in the South. The been fundamentally undermined by policies impact of globalization has also significantly promoted by the key institutions of exacerbated the emergence of conflicts largely globalization. Adopting a state-centred in the South, which directly undermines national conceptualization of security demonstrates how and individual security. globalization at once weakens and fragments the state, while militarizing both the state and sub- In the first chapter, I begin by outlining a state actors, contributing systematically to the theoretical framework for examining the impact emergence of intra- and inter-state conflicts. A of globalization on security at multiple of levels human-centred framework, however, focusing of analysis. I discuss two distinct but on the impact of globalization on individuals overlapping conceptualizations of security: and communities, shows that this process is firstly, economic security as a function of further linked to the generation of structural human security (at the level of individuals); and violence across national boundaries. Both these secondly, economic security as a function of national -and human- level processes are national security (at the level of the state). mutually interdependent and impact on one Thirdly, I put forward a description of another reciprocally.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Governance, Development and Human Security: Exploring the Links
    Third World Quarterly, Vol 22, No 2, pp 159–1 75, 2001 Global governance, development and human security: exploring the links CAROLINE THOMAS ABSTRACT This article draws attention to the convergence of the global development and security agendas at the beginning of the new millennium. It explores the links between global governance, development and human security. It argues that material sufficiency lies at the core of human security. Hence, the problems of poverty and deepening inequality are central concerns, and the unfolding of these problems in the 1980s and 1990s is highlighted. During the closing decades of the 20th century, a neoliberal vision dominated the global development policy agenda, while these problems of inequality deepened. The policy was developed, championed and implemented by a range of global gover- nance institutions, working through state governments. The idea and the institu- tions of global governance are examined critically, with a view to establishing in whose interest global governance and its associated development policies may be operating, and whether this is in support of human security. Setting the scene Poverty is the ultimate systemic threat facing humanity. The widening gaps between rich and poor nations … are …potentially socially explosive … If the poor are left hopeless, poverty will undermine societies through confrontation, violence and civil disorder. (Michel Camdessus, Managing Director of the IMF, 2000b) In a world awash with resources, wealth and technology, global poverty is certainly not the product of bad luck. (Peter Wilkin, 2000) Pervasive poverty and deepening inequality are distinctive features of the contemporary global social landscape. Powerful global governance institutions are awakening to these fault lines as potential threats to the global order.
    [Show full text]