Central Queensland Workforce Development Initiatives

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Central Queensland Workforce Development Initiatives REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUSTRALIA Central Queensland Workforce Development Initiatives Regional Engagement Project Prepared by Jenny Descovich Heather Norris June 2012 This report was produced on behalf of Regional Development Australia Mackay Whitsunday Inc and Regional Development Australia Fitzroy and Central West Inc and was funded by the Queensland Government. General Disclaimer: While every care has been taken in preparing this publication, the Regional Development Australia and the State of Queensland accepts no responsibility for decisions or actions taken as a result of any data, information, statement or advice, expressed or implied, contained within. To the best of our knowledge, the content was correct at the time of publishing. Any references to legislation are not an interpretation of the law. They are to be used as a guide only. The information in this publication is general and does not take into account individual circumstances or situations. Where appropriate, independent legal advice should be sought. Research for this project was completed prior to the Queensland Election in March 2012 therefore references and hyperlinks relate to government structures prior to the election. They have not been altered to reflect recent changes in Government agencies as it will be some before these changes are finalised and web sites amended. It is envisaged that these links will be redirected to new sites as they are established. Maps and other research material provided by the Queensland Government display the relevant department names and logos at the time they were produced and shall remain in that format which is appropriate for the timestamp displayed on that material. [2] Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 7 Project Area................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Timeframe ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Objectives...................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Deliverables................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Related Projects ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 Region Overview ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 METHODS......................................................................................................................................................... 9 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................................ 10 Workforce Demand across Industry Sectors ............................................................................................................... 10 LGA Gaps and Opportunities....................................................................................................................................... 16 Focus Areas ................................................................................................................................................................ 18 KEY FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................................... 19 Regional Workforce Strategy....................................................................................................................................... 19 Collaborative Approach ............................................................................................................................................... 19 Review initiatives and programs .................................................................................................................................. 20 Maximising Retention in the workforce ........................................................................................................................ 20 School to Industry Pathways ....................................................................................................................................... 20 Dual Sector Tertiary Education.................................................................................................................................... 20 PROJECT ASSESSMENT.............................................................................................................................. 22 Assessment against Objectives................................................................................................................................... 22 Assessment of Deliverables ........................................................................................................................................ 22 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................................... 23 Workforce Collaboration Forum June 2012 ................................................................................................................. 23 REFERENCE SOURCES................................................................................................................................ 24 ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................................................... 26 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................... 27 APPENDIX A: RESOURCE SECTOR PROFILE ........................................................................................... 28 APPENDIX B: LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA PROFILES........................................................................... 68 APPENDIX C: APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINEESHIP DATA BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA....... 129 APPENDIX D: INDUSTRY SKILLS COUNCILS AND INDUSTRY SKILLS BODIES ................................ 154 APPENDIX E: CONSULTATION .................................................................................................................. 166 APPENDIX F: SCHOOL TO INDUSTRY PATHWAYS AND PROGRAMS ................................................. 169 APPENDIX G: REGIONAL DEMOGRAPHICS ............................................................................................ 172 [3] Executive Summary The Queensland Government engaged RDA to undertake Regional Engagement for their proposed Central Queensland Resource Catchment Workforce Development Strategy (CQRCWDS). This report details the regional engagement process and the appendices detail the information collated from regional stakeholders on proposed developments across the region, the workforce implications where known and current workforce development initiatives. Project Objectives To ensure that regional stakeholders have a mechanism for input into the CQRCWDS; To catalogue current and proposed workforce development initiatives in the region across all industry sectors; To develop the regional story on future workforce requirements across all industry sectors by reviewing major projects and current and projected skills shortages; and Ensure the regional story is reflected in the Queensland Government’s CQRCWDS. Workforce Demand across Industry Sectors The Central Queensland Region has four major sectors to its economy being: Resources Construction Agriculture Tourism Whilst different sectors predominate in various parts of the region (such as tourism in the Whitsundays), the regional economy is based on the overall performance of these sectors. It is important to ensure that developments in one sector (such as resources) do not adversely impact the ability for other sectors to continue to contribute to the regional economy. Maintaining a balance across the entire region is critical to the future performance of the regional economy as sectors experience fluctuations in performance primarily due to external factors. Increased workforce demands are predicted for the Resource and Construction sectors; potentially further impacting workforce shortages in other sectors. The resource sector predicts a potential demand for an additional 17,000 workforce in the Bowen Basin with an anticipated 4,200 resident within the resource communities of the Bowen Basin1. Construction Skills Queensland estimates that 60% of total major construction projects investment will occur in the Central Queensland area. It is estimated that a peak construction workforce of 30,200 persons will be required by 2014/15, and it seems likely that Central Queensland will account for a significant portion of this anticipated workforce peak2. The agricultural sector is responding by developing career pathways as well as training and development strategies to support
Recommended publications
  • 2020 ACARP Report
    2020 THE COAL INDUSTRY’S RESEARCH PROGRAM WWW.ACARP.COM.AU 1 CHAIRMAN’S REPORT ACARP’s role is to identify the coal industry’s research needs; Welcome to our 2020 ACARP Report. select and award research projects; and manage the research Ken Singer Manager Mine Control (UMM) BMA Much has been and will be written of 2020 with the impacts program, including communicating the outcomes to the industry of COVID-19 far reaching. ACARP was not immune. Saleable in a way that best accelerates their implementation. The focus Peter Smith General Manager HS Centennial Coal production recorded by ACARP for FY20 was 444.8 million tonnes continues to be on improving safety, boosting productivity and and ACARP funded $18.7 million in direct research spend. During minimising the environmental impacts of mining. Considerable Trevor Stay General Manager Gas Anglo American the second half of 2020 coal production reduced in response to focus this year has included research of dust particulate matter depressed coal demand. COVID-19 has had a minimal impact Andrew Swiericzuk Project Manager-Studies, Coal Australia Rio Tinto measurement, impacts and prevention and mine site rehabilitation on ACARP operations as we elected to curtail some service and the re-purposing of final voids in post mining landscapes. activities such as face to face meetings and travel. Reduced work A number of significant projects included in this report are funding approved 2015 arrangements introduced by Researchers including access to continuing, and we believe that these too will provide great workplaces and laboratories, travel restrictions limiting access benefits to the industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Infrastructure Strategic Plan
    Nnpcr ^u.:^ Uric: ^2^ ` to - l-0 Member : Mvs Cam. tiwU11.5" Tabled Tabled, by leave Incorporated, Remainder incorporated, by leave by leave Clerk at the Table: Z Social Infrastructure Strategic Plan Queensland Government GLADSTONE REGIONAL COUNCIL Contents Foreword As Mayor of Gladstone Regional Council, I am proud to be a partner in the development of the Social Infrastructure Strategic Plan for the Gladstone region. The results of this extensive research and planning work have already delivered value to Council in terms of guiding current community planning activities. Adequate planning for social infrastructure and services is fundamental to managing growth. The development of the Gladstone Region Social Infrastructure - Voluntary Industry Contributions Framework will enable companies to channel funds to the areas of need as determined by a thorough analysis of the existing social infrastructure capital base, the impacts of future growth on community facilities and services as well as feedback through community engagement. I fully support the Queensland Government's proposal to establish the Gladstone Foundation as a regionally based pooled industry fund - it is essential to the successful implementation of the Social Infrastructure Strategic Plan. I urge major companies to get behind the proposed Gladstone Foundation and help to implement these important investment priorities in social infrastructure across the region. The Gladstone Region Social Infrastructure - Voluntary Industry Contributions Framework will ensure a strong and strategic structure is in place to guide industry investment in social infrastructure. The preparation of this Framework is essentially the beginning of a process - it is a "living" document and one which requires continuous update and review to ensure industry funds are directed to areas which deliver maximum benefits to the community.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic and Social Impacts of Protecting the Environmental Values of the Waters of the Capricorn and Curtis Coasts
    OCTOBER 2014 The economic and social impacts of protecting the environmental values of the waters of the Capricorn and Curtis Coasts Report prepared for the Department of Environment and Heritage Protection Marsden Jacob Associates Financial & Economic Consultants ABN 66 663 324 657 ACN 072 233 204 Internet: http://www.marsdenjacob.com.au E‐mail: [email protected] Melbourne office: Postal address: Level 3, 683 Burke Road, Camberwell Victoria 3124 AUSTRALIA Telephone: +61 3 9882 1600 Facsimile: +61 3 9882 1300 Brisbane office: Level 14, 127 Creek Street, Brisbane Queensland, 4000 AUSTRALIA Telephone: +61 7 3229 7701 Facsimile: +61 7 3229 7944 Perth office: Level 1, 220 St Georges Terrace, Perth Western Australia, 6000 AUSTRALIA Telephone: +61 8 9324 1785 Facsimile: +61 8 9322 7936 Sydney office: 119 Willoughby Road, Crows Nest New South Wales, 2065 AUSTRALIA Telephone: +61 418 765 393 Authors: Jim Binney, Gene Tunny (alphabetical order) Contact: Gene Tunny, +61 7 3229 7701 This report has been prepared in accordance with the scope of services described in the contract or agreement between Marsden Jacob Associates Pty Ltd ACN 072 233 204 (MJA) and the Client. Any findings, conclusions or recommendations only apply to the aforementioned circumstances and no greater reliance should be assumed or drawn by the Client. Furthermore, the report has been prepared solely for use by the Client and Marsden Jacob Associates accepts no responsibility for its use by other parties. Copyright © Marsden Jacob Associates Pty Ltd 2014 TABLE OF
    [Show full text]
  • Methods for the Mackay-Whitsunday-Isaac 2018
    METHODS FOR THE MACKAY-WHITSUNDAY-ISAAC 2018 REPORT CARD ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS Authorship statement The Mackay-Whitsunday-Isaac Healthy Rivers to Reef Healthy Partnership (Partnership) Methods for Environmental Indicators for the Mackay-Whitsunday-Isaac 2018 Report Card technical report was compiled by the Partnership’s Technical Officers, Alysha Lee and Jessica Gillespie. Substantial input was received from the Regional Report Cards Technical Working Group (TWG) members. Some content was also drawn from technical reports from earlier Mackay-Whitsunday- Isaac report cards. Regional Report Cards Technical Working Group members Diane Tarte (TWG Chair July 2018 onwards) Adam Fletcher Paulina Kaniewska Nicola Stokes Richard Hunt Reinier Mann Tegan Whitehead Angus Thompson Emma Maxwell Nathan Waltham Alysha Lee Alex Carter Jessica Gillespie Michael Rasheed Carl Mitchell Glynis Orr Nyssa Henry Luke Galea Michael Holmes Eddie Jebreen David Moffatt Ken Rhode Andrew Moss Travis Sydes Lynne Powell Lyndon Llewellyn Judith Wake Nadine Marshall Donna Audas Paul Groves Chris Dench Stephen Lewis Michael Nash Chris Manning Melinda Louden Adam Folkers Acknowledgements The authors also thank Phillip Trendell, Bernie Cockayne, Bronwyn Houlden, Carol Honchin, Len McKenzie, Jamie Corfield and Matt Curnock for their technical input into various aspects of document development and/or their review of the document. Members of the Reef Independent Science Panel are also gratefully acknowledged for their advice and review of this document. Suggested citation Mackay-Whitsunday-Isaac Healthy Rivers to Reef Partnership (2019). Methods for the Mackay- Whitsunday-Isaac 2018 Report Card: Environmental Indicators, Technical Report. Mackay- Whitsunday-Isaac Healthy Rivers to Reef Partnership, Mackay. This technical report was finalised and released online in November 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia Pacific LNG Project
    Australia Pacific LNG Project Volume 5: Attachments Attachment 45: Economic Baseline Report for the Gladstone Region Volume 5: Attachments Attachment 45: Economic Baseline Report for the Gladstone Region Disclaimer This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Australia Pacific LNG Pty Limited, and is subject to and issued in accordance with the agreement between Australia Pacific LNG Pty Limited and WorleyParsons Services Pty Ltd. WorleyParsons Services Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for it in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. Copying this report without the permission of Australia Pacific LNG Pty Limited or WorleyParsons is not permitted. Australia Pacific LNG Project EIS Page ii March 2010 Volume 5: Attachments Attachment 45: Economic Baseline Report for the Gladstone Region Economic Baseline Report for the Gladstone Region Report for Australia Pacific LNG project Professor John Rolfe Centre for Environmental Management CQUniversity, Rockhampton September 2009 Contributions to this report have also been made by Mr Peter Donaghy and Mr Grant O’Dea Australia Pacific LNG Project EIS Page 1 March 2010 Volume 5: Attachments Attachment 45: Economic Baseline Report for the Gladstone Region Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project background..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gladstone Region Population Report, 2016
    Queensland Government Statistician’s Office Gladstone region population report, 2016 Introduction The Gladstone region population report, 2016 provides estimates of Figure 1 Gladstone region the non-resident population of the Gladstone region during the last week of June 2016, based on surveys conducted by Queensland Government Statistician’s Office (QGSO). Information regarding the supply and take-up of commercial accommodation by non-resident workers is also summarised. The non-resident population represents the number of fly-in/fly-out and drive-in/drive-out (FIFO/DIDO) workers who were on-shift in the region at the time of collection. This group includes those involved in the production, construction, and maintenance of mining and gas industry operations, projects and related infrastructure. Non-resident workers are not included in estimated resident population (ERP) data released annually by the Australian Bureau of Statistics. As a result, the full–time equivalent (FTE) population estimates presented in this report, which combine the resident and non-resident populations, provide a more complete indicator of total demand for certain services than either measure used alone. Key findings Key findings of this report include: The non-resident population of the Gladstone region was The Gladstone region – at a glance estimated at 1,540 persons at the end of June 2016, around 3,890 persons or 72% lower than in June 2015. The Gladstone region comprises the local government area (LGA) of Gladstone (R), which Gladstone region's non-resident population in 2015–16 largely includes the city and port of Gladstone, as well as comprised FIFO/DIDO workers engaged in construction of three other residential centres and the rural hinterland.
    [Show full text]
  • Invest Capricorn Coast Region Economic Development Plan a Message from the Mayor
    Invest Capricorn Coast Region INVEST CAPRICORN COAST REGION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN A MESSAGE FROM THE MAYOR Bill Ludwig Mayor Livingstone Shire Council As one of the faster-growing detailed strategic initiatives and supporting activities that, in conjunction with enabling projects, will facilitate areas outside the southern future economic growth. corner, the Capricorn Coast While Council has a critical role to play as both a ‘champion‘ and facilitator of economic growth, the region offers unrivalled successful delivery of a plan of this scope and magnitude investment and commercial can only be achieved in partnership, and with collective input from every business and industry sector. These opportunities, as well as premier sectors must include local business, tourism, service lifestyle options. Importantly, our delivery, construction, primary production and resource industries. Extensive engagement with the community region is well-positioned with the and all sectors was undertaken in the development of critical infrastructure required this plan. to service a diverse and growing It is equally critical that our EDP has input and support from all tiers of government to ensure that, where economy. necessary, our plan is as closely aligned as possible with current and future regional, state and national economic The Invest Capricorn Coast Region Economic development strategic initiatives, many of which have Development Plan (EDP) documents our current been considered and referenced in the EDP. economic status, our assets, opportunities
    [Show full text]
  • Bowen Basin Coalfields of Central Queensland (Figure 1)
    The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy International Symposium on Stability of Rock Slopes in Open Pit Mining and Civil Engineering John V Simmons and Peter J Simpson COMPOSITE FAILURE MECHANISMS IN COAL MEASURES ROCK MASSES – MYTHS AND REALITY John V Simmons Sherwood Geotechnical and Research Services Peter J Simpson BMA Coal Pty Ltd Central Queensland Office 1. INTRODUCTION Excavated slopes in open pit coal mines are designed to be as steep as possible consistent with stability and safety requirements. Slope failures occur for many reasons, including oversteepening. This paper is concerned with slope design and excavation experience in the Bowen Basin coalfields of central Queensland (Figure 1), Bowen Basin Coalfields Figure 1 Location of Bowen Basin open pit coal mines in eastern Australia Page 31 The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy International Symposium on Stability of Rock Slopes in Open Pit Mining and Civil Engineering John V Simmons and Peter J Simpson but it deals with many issues that are common to open pit coal mining generally. After more than three decades of operational experience and technological advances in the Bowen Basin mines, sudden rock slope failures still occur in circumstances where personnel and equipment are at extreme risk. The circumstances of a selection of these sudden failures are reviewed in this paper, and some concerning trends emerge. Classical structurally-controlled slope failures occur quite rarely in the Bowen Basin, but rock mass structures appear to exert important controls on the sudden failures that are more widely experienced. The term "composite" is used in this paper to describe failures involving combinations of intact rock material fracture and shear movement on defects (Baczynski, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Extreme Weather Event Contingency Plan Gladstone Region – 2020/2021
    Extreme Weather Event Contingency Plan Gladstone Region – 2020/2021 incorporating Mary River, Hervey Bay, Tin Can Bay, Bundaberg, Gladstone, Port Alma, Fitzroy River and Rosslyn Bay Introduction Maritime Safety Queensland (MSQ) is an agency of the Dept. of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR) which works closely and cooperatively with the disaster management agencies, the industry and community on both a State wide and local basis. The recent extreme weather events throughout Queensland have highlighted the need for awareness and vigilance to the risks such events present to the maritime community. MSQ’s core focus is on the preservation of life and property on the State’s waters and in the prevention/response to ship-based pollution. Aligning itself with the MSQ mantra of 'safer and cleaner seas'. The extreme weather events of recent seasons have highlighted the need for awareness and vigilance to the risks such events present to maritime operations. MSQ has built on these recent experiences and is reissuing its contingency plans as one way of ensuring stronger resilience within the maritime community. Timely awareness and adequate preparation will reduce the impact of such events. This extreme weather event contingency plan for Gladstone Region sets out the broad framework that will apply for this region. MSQ takes advice on developing weather situations from the Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) which is the government’s primary source of weather intelligence. The Gladstone Region encompasses the area of the coast and waterways from St Lawrence in the North to Double Island Point in the South. The Region includes the Ports of Gladstone, Port Alma and Bundaberg, all boat harbours and marinas and includes all navigable rivers, creeks and streams as well as off shore islands within Queensland jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Gladstone Region Major Industry & Infrastructure Providers
    Gladstone region Major Industry & Infrastructure Providers CONTENTS NRG Gladstone Power Station 2 Central Queensland Ports Authority 3 Gladstone Area Water Board 5 Queensland Rail 6 Queensland Gas Pipeline 7 Boyne Smelters Limited 8 Cement Australia (Qld) Pty Ltd 9 Queensland Energy Resources Limited 11 Comalco Alumina Refinery 11 Queensland Alumina Limited 12 Orica Australia Pty Ltd 14 Austicks and Frost Enterprises 15 Industry Profiles: January 2005 The Gladstone Region NRG GLADSTONE POWER The station was sited to take advantage of seawater for cooling and to be near to Central STATION Queensland’s vast coal reserves. The station’s six-megawatt turbogenerators each output 16,200 volts to transformers that convert the power to a level suitable for transmission at 132,000 or 275,000 volts. CUSTOMERS The Gladstone Power Station sells most of its electricity to Boyne Smelters under a long-term contract. The station remains inter-connected with the Queensland Electricity grid and the remainder of the power generated is committed to OWNERSHIP AND OPERATION the state. The Gladstone Power Station is a world class COAL SUPPLY power station providing safe, reliable low cost electricity to customers. Since 1994 the station More than four million tonnes of coal each year has been operated by NRG Gladstone Operating are railed to the station from coalfields in Central Services on behalf of the joint venture Queensland. participants, Comalco Ltd (42.125%) and NRG Energy Inc (37.5%), as well as SLMA GPS Pty Coal is stockpiled after unloading, then reclaimed Ltd (8.50%), Ryowa II GPS Pty Ltd (7.125%) and from the stockpiles by either of two stacker YKK GPS (Queensland) Pty Ltd (4.75%).
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Government Submission to the Industry Commission Black
    Submission to the Industry Commission inquiry into the black coal industry QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT SUBMISSION TO THE INDUSTRY COMMISSION BLACK COAL INQUIRY PREPARED BY THE QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT November 1997 Queensland Government - November 1997 Submission to the Industry Commission inquiry into the black coal industry ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT This document has been compiled by the Department of Mines and Energy on behalf of the Queensland Government. Contributions have been received from Queensland Treasury, Department of Premier and Cabinet, Department of Economic Development and Trade, Department of Training and Industrial Relations, Department of Transport, Department of Natural Resources and the Department of Environment. Requests for further information or explanation of the position paper should be directed to: Mr Stephen Matheson A/Manager Resources Economics and Analysis Unit Resource Development Division Department of Mines and Energy Ph: (07) 3237 1614 Fax: (07) 3237 0470 Email: [email protected] Queensland Government - November 1997 Submission to the Industry Commission inquiry into the black coal industry TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 VISION OF THE CO AL INDUSTRY ................................ ................................ ..........1 2.0 CONCLUSIONS/RECO MMENDATIONS ................................ ................................ 3 3.0 INTRODUCTION ................................ ................................ ................................ ..............5 4.0 THE COAL INDUSTRY IN QUEENSLAND ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Gas Drainage Efficiency at the Grasstree Mine
    THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND Bachelor of Engineering Thesis Evaluation of the Gas Drainage Efficiency at the Grasstree Mine Student Name: Michael VAN DER MEER Course Code: MINE4123 Supervisor: Associate Professor Mehmet Kizil and Doctor Saiied Aminossadati Submission date: 6 November, 2017 A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Bachelor of Engineering (Hons) degree in Mining Engineering (Extended Major) UQ Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Architecture and Information Technology i ABSTRACT Inappropriate coal mine gas management has the potential to cause catastrophic disasters resulting in multiple fatalities. Gas is naturally released into the mining work environment during production and development; pre- and post-drainage form the basis of gas management. The Grasstree Mine site located in the Bowen Basin is an underground coal mine that utilises both pre- and post-drainage techniques. Unique to Grasstree is the high gas content of the mining and adjacent seams. This project studies the methane capture efficiency of the GC906 longwall panel against critical events that affect the gas management and ventilation of the mine. The aim is to identify the most effective gas management techniques for future longwall blocks with reduced ventilation at the Grasstree Mine. The data utilised in this project was post-drainage flows and concentrations provided from measurements and recordings taken for the full duration of GC906 mining. Methane capture efficiency was calculated for each hour for the duration of GC906 longwall mining; 18/11/2016-21/06/2017. The critical events analysed were: Initial longwall square-up period; Transitioning from two to three return gateroads; Full duration of a HGH well transitioning from long to short goaf gas drainage; The restriction of a return roadway to improve goaf dynamics; and Analysis of the effects of vertical post-drainage holes over the maingate side on the overall gas drainage.
    [Show full text]