DOCSLIB.ORG

Letter to Chairmen Goodlatte and Gowdy September 27, 2018 Page 1 of 6 September 27, 2018 Bob Goodlatte Chairman Committee On

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Letter to Chairmen Goodlatte and Gowdy September 27, 2018 Page 1 of 6 September 27, 2018 Bob Goodlatte Chairman Committee On Letter to Chairmen Goodlatte and Gowdy September 27, 2018 Page 1 of 6 September 27, 2018 via Electronic Mail Bob Goodlatte Chairman Committee on the Judiciary U.S. House of Representatives Trey Gowdy Chairman Committee on Oversight and Government Reform U.S. House of Representatives c/o Arthur Baker [email protected] Re: Glenn Simpson Dear Chairman Goodlatte and Chairman Gowdy: We are in receipt of your letter, dated September 24, 2018, inviting our client Glenn Simpson to participate in a transcribed interview. After due consideration, Mr. Simpson, who has already cooperated with three congressional committees regarding the same subject matter,1 will not agree to the interview. 1 See, e.g., Voluntary Transcribed Interview of Glenn R. Simpson, Senate Judiciary Committee, Aug. 22, 2017, available at https://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/politics/read-the-full-transcript-of- glenn-simpsons-senate-testimony/2700/; Voluntary Transcribed Interview of Glenn R. Simpson, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Nov. 14, 2017, available at https://docs.house.gov/meetings/IG/IG00/20180118/106796/HMTG-115-IG00-20180118-SD002.pdf. Letter to Chairmen Goodlatte and Gowdy September 27, 2018 Page 2 of 6 The so-called “task force,” formed by members of the two committees you chair, has demonstrated a propensity to flout rules of confidentiality in order to manipulate the record and prejudice witnesses. The “task force” is comprised of some of the President’s staunchest protectors, who have misspent American taxpayers’ dollars to undermine the Special Counsel’s investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election, even after the U.S. Intelligence Community and the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence both confirmed that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election for the purpose of electing Donald J. Trump.2 The “task force” justified this misuse of their committees’ powers under the false premise that the Department of Justice investigation was brought on by the President’s 2016 campaign rivals, when in fact it was initiated by a tip from the Australian government and eventually took the form of a Special Counsel investigation at the behest of the President’s own appointee, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. Part and parcel of this concerted effort by the President’s congressional allies has been a campaign of retaliation against the government’s whistleblowers, including our client Mr. Simpson, for their willingness to cooperate with US law enforcement and for their exercise of their constitutional rights to free speech and political activity as American citizens. While it is a fact that the Australian government, one of the U.S. government’s strongest and most trusted allies, provided the information that initiated the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign and Russia,3 the President and his allies on the Hill have sought to bury that fact by emphasizing the provision of information to the Justice Department by our client and Mr. Steele. Further, they have buried the impeccable professional credentials and talents of our client, a principal at one of the country’s leading research firms and a former investigative journalist with the Wall Street Journal, and Christopher Steele, one of the leading Western intelligence experts on 2 See Martin Matishak, Senate Intelligence Committee Backs Assessment of Russia Election Meddling, POLITICO, Jul. 3, 2018, available at https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/03/senate-intelligence-russia- election-meddling-692616. 3 The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence majority concluded: “Finding #17: The Federal Bureau of Investigation opened an enterprise counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign after receiving information related to Trump campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos.” HPSCI, Report on Russian Active Measures, Mar. 22, 2018, at 47, available at https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/final_russia_investigation_report.pdf; see also Sharon LaFraniere, Mark Mazzetti & Matt Apuzzo, How the Russia Inquiry Began: A Campaign Aide, Drinks and Talk of Political Dirt, N.Y. TIMES, Dec. 30, 2017, available at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/30/us/politics/how-fbi-russia-investigation-began-george- papadopoulos.html. Letter to Chairmen Goodlatte and Gowdy September 27, 2018 Page 3 of 6 Russia, by disingenuously painting them as rank partisan political operatives. Picking on these two sources from an ocean of people who shared their concerns with law enforcement about possible illegal activities involving nefarious foreign actors, the “task force” and its allies on the Hill have applied unprecedented pressure on the Justice Department to produce documents related to an ongoing investigation. Such disclosure could jeopardize sources, methods and the Justice Department investigation itself. The “task force” smears of whistleblowers and responsible government actors have continued from antecedent practices of the President’s allies on the Hill. For example, just days after the Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee sent Mr. Simpson a request for documents and information and well before the letter’s deadline,4 the Chair released to the public a letter to the Department of Justice that falsely accused Mr. Simpson of non-existent crimes.5 Likewise, the Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee smeared former British intelligence official Christopher Steele by publicly referring him to the Department of Justice for having allegedly made a false statement to the Department of Justice based on classified information that, unlike the criminal referral, the public could not see.6 It was a publicity stunt that fooled no one.7 The “task force,” for its part, has established a clear and abundant record of abusing the confidential interview process in order to mischaracterize the statements of 4 See Letter from Sen. Charles E. Grassley to Glenn R. Simpson, Mar. 24, 2017, available at https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2017-03- 24%20CEG%20to%20Fusion%20GPS%20(Trump%20Dossier).pdf. 5 See Letter from Sen. Charles E. Grassley to Acting Deputy Attorney General Dana Boente, Mar. 31, 2017, available at https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2017-03- 31%20CEG%20to%20DOJ%20(Anti-Magnitsky%20FARA%20violations)%20with%20attachments.pdf. 6 See Letter from Sen. Charles E. Grassley and Sen. Lindsey O. Graham to Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher A. Wray, Jan. 4, 2018, available at https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01- 04%20CEG%20LG%20to%20FBI%20DOJ%20(unclassified%20cover%20letter%20for%20classified%20S. ._.pdf. 7 See Nicholas Fandos & Matthew Rosenberg, Republican Senators Raise Possible Charges against Author of Trump Dossier, N.Y. TIMES, Jan. 5, 2018, available at https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/05/us/politics/christopher-steele-dossier-judiciary-committee.html. Letter to Chairmen Goodlatte and Gowdy September 27, 2018 Page 4 of 6 witnesses and unjustly slander and impugn them in public.8 My client is no stranger to this process, having already cooperated with Congress on multiple occasions in interviews held behind closed doors, only to later watch Republican members and staff knowingly obfuscate his testimony and the record as a whole, through selective leaks of what were supposed to be confidential proceedings. Mr. Simpson has already complied with demands for closed-door interviews by three congressional committees, providing a total of some 20 hours of testimony concerning his knowledge of Donald J. Trump’s questionable business practices, his extensive ties to organized crime, his presidential campaign’s surreptitious and illicit connections to Russia, and Russia’s attempts to infiltrate the Republican Party and undermine the democratic system of the United States. Much of Mr. Simpson’s information, including testimony that was harshly ridiculed by Republican members, has now been substantiated. Regrettably, Republican members and staff selectively quoted and otherwise misrepresented to the media and public the contents of Mr. Simpson’s prior confidential testimony in a series of transparent and cynical attempts to impugn him and incriminate him. This blatant manipulation of the record, in turn, caused Mr. Simpson and his business partner Peter Fritsch to exercise their First Amendment rights to publish a commentary in The New York Times summarizing the accurate substance of Mr. Simpson’s testimony and calling for the release of the actual testimony, in full.9 The disclosure of Mr. Simpson’s full transcripts severely undermined attempts by President Trump and his allies in Congress to discredit Mr. Steele’s reports in what is now referred to as the “Dossier.” Since then, the numerous Special Counsel indictments and convictions of Russian government agents and various associates of President Trump (many of whom were named in the “Dossier”) have only strengthened the credibility and validity of Mr. Simpson’s and Mr. Steele’s disclosures to the Department of Justice (to say nothing of President Trump’s alarming statements in Helsinki elevating Vladimir Putin’s credibility over that of the U.S. Intelligence Community, President Trump’s public 8 See, e.g., John Parkinson, Republicans Say They Have New Leads after Interview with Former FBI Lawyer Lisa Page, ABC NEWS, Jul. 16, 2018 (reporting leak from Congressman Darrell Issa, who slandered the witness and her testimony), available at https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/republicans- leads-interview-fbi-lawyer-lisa-page/story?id=56632046; Kimberley A. Strassel, What Bruce Ohr Told Congress, WALL ST. J., Aug. 30, 2018, available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-bruce-ohr-told- congress-1535668660?mod=hp_opin_pos2&ns=prod/accounts-wsj (paywall). 9 See Glenn R. Simpson & Peter Fritsch, The Republicans’ Fake Investigations, N.Y. TIMES, Jan. 2, 2018, available at https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/02/opinion/republicans-investigation-fusion-gps.html. Letter to Chairmen Goodlatte and Gowdy September 27, 2018 Page 5 of 6 laments about signing a sanctions bill against Russian oligarchs into law, and President Trump’s unstaffed personal meetings with Mr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JW Sues for Records of Clinton State Department
    The Judicial Watch ® MAY 2018 VOLUME 24 / ISSUE 5 A News Publication from Judicial Watch VerdictA News PublicationWWW.JUDICIALWATCH.ORG from Judicial Watch JW Files Two Lawsuits For Docs On Justice Department Officials’ Ties To Fusion GPS Justice Department official Bruce Ohr’s wife worked for Clinton- connected firm Judicial Watch filed two Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits against the Justice Department on March 1, 2018 for records about top Justice Department official Bruce Ohr’s and his wife Nellie Ohr’s involvement in the Trump dossier authored by former British spy Christopher Steele (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No.1:18-cv-00490)) and (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No.1:18-cv-00491)). Until his dossier-related demotion, Bruce Ohr was the fourth-ranked official at the Justice De- partment and an Obama-administration contact for Steele. The House Intelligence Committee WIKIPEDIA See LAWSUIT on page 2 U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 3 JW Sues For Records Of Clinton Message from State Department Protocol Officer the President 6 Judicial Watch sued the U.S. Court Report Department of State on January 31, 10 2018 for emails, calendar entries Corruption and other information in the elec- Chronicles tronic file of Dennis Cheng, who was deputy chief of protocol for two 14 years under former Secretary of State Government Hillary Clinton (Judicial Watch v U.S. Uncovered Department of State (No. 1:18-cv- 00221)). Cheng was deputy chief of pro- tocol of the United States from July 2009 – July 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • The Irs's Systematic Delay and Scrutiny Of
    THE IRS’S SYSTEMATIC DELAY AND SCRUTINY OF TEA PARTY APPLICATIONS HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JULY 18, 2013 Serial No. 113–51 Printed for the use of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov http://www.house.gov/reform U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 82–435 PDF WASHINGTON : 2013 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Aug 31 2005 11:16 Sep 03, 2013 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\DOCS\82435.TXT APRIL COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM DARRELL E. ISSA, California, Chairman JOHN L. MICA, Florida ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland, Ranking MICHAEL R. TURNER, Ohio Minority Member JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR., Tennessee CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York PATRICK T. MCHENRY, North Carolina ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of JIM JORDAN, Ohio Columbia JASON CHAFFETZ, Utah JOHN F. TIERNEY, Massachusetts TIM WALBERG, Michigan WM. LACY CLAY, Missouri JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma STEPHEN F. LYNCH, Massachusetts JUSTIN AMASH, Michigan JIM COOPER, Tennessee PAUL A. GOSAR, Arizona GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia PATRICK MEEHAN, Pennsylvania JACKIE SPEIER, California SCOTT DESJARLAIS, Tennessee MATTHEW A. CARTWRIGHT, Pennsylvania TREY GOWDY, South Carolina MARK POCAN, Wisconsin BLAKE FARENTHOLD, Texas TAMMY DUCKWORTH, Illinois DOC HASTINGS, Washington ROBIN L. KELLY, Illinois CYNTHIA M. LUMMIS, Wyoming DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois ROB WOODALL, Georgia PETER WELCH, Vermont THOMAS MASSIE, Kentucky TONY CARDENAS, California DOUG COLLINS, Georgia STEVEN A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case Study of Crossfire Hurricane
    TIMELINE: Congressional Oversight in the Face of Executive Branch and Media Suppression: The Case Study of Crossfire Hurricane 2009 FBI opens a counterintelligence investigation of the individual who would become Christopher Steele’s primary sub-source because of his ties to Russian intelligence officers.1 June 2009: FBI New York Field Office (NYFO) interviews Carter Page, who “immediately advised [them] that due to his work and overseas experiences, he has been questioned by and provides information to representatives of [another U.S. government agency] on an ongoing basis.”2 2011 February 2011: CBS News investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson begins reporting on “Operation Fast and Furious.” Later in the year, Attkisson notices “anomalies” with several of her work and personal electronic devices that persist into 2012.3 2012 September 11, 2012: Attack on U.S. installations in Benghazi, Libya.4 2013 March 2013: The existence of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server becomes publicly known.5 May 2013: o News reports reveal Obama’s Justice Department investigating leaks of classified information and targeting reporters, including secretly seizing “two months of phone records for reporters and editors of The Associated Press,”6 labeling Fox News reporter James Rosen as a “co-conspirator,” and obtaining a search warrant for Rosen’s personal emails.7 May 10, 2013: Reports reveal that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) targeted and unfairly scrutinized conservative organizations seeking tax-exempt status.8
    [Show full text]
  • The Politicization and Polarization of Climate Change
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2021 The Politicization and Polarization of Climate Change Williamson Grassle Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses Part of the American Politics Commons, Environmental Law Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Grassle, Williamson, "The Politicization and Polarization of Climate Change" (2021). CMC Senior Theses. 2663. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/2663 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Claremont McKenna College The Politicization and Polarization of Climate Change Submitted to Professor John J. Pitney, Jr. By Williamson Grassle For Senior Thesis Spring 2021 May 3rd 1 Table of Contents TITLE……………………………………………………………………………………..1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………….3 ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………………4 INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………...5 CHAPTER 1 – LATE 20TH, EARLY 21ST CENTURY………………………………....12 CHAPTER 2 – RECENT………………………………………………………………...24 CHAPTER 3 – FUTURE………………………………………………………………...39 WORK CITED…………………………………………………………………………...52 2 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Professor John J. Pitney for his guidance and support on this thesis. Throughout my time at Claremont McKenna, you have helped foster my passion for politics and define my interest in environmental policy. Without your guidance and expertise, I would not have been able to complete this project. 3 Abstract In the mid to late 20th-century, climate change and other environmental issues were addressed on a bipartisan basis, with Republican politicians like President Richard Nixon and George H.W. Bush supporting and advancing measures to combat climate change. However, since the 1990s, climate change has become increasingly polarized, with significant polarization in the last decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Politicians, Partisan Roll Calls, and the Tea Party: Evaluating the 2010 Midterm Elections
    Electoral Studies 32 (2013) 26–36 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Electoral Studies journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/electstud Strategic politicians, partisan roll calls, and the Tea Party: Evaluating the 2010 midterm elections Jamie L. Carson a,*, Stephen Pettigrew b a University of Georgia, 104 Baldwin Hall, Athens, GA 30602-1615, USA b Harvard University, Department of Government, 1737 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA article info abstract Article history: The 2010 midterm elections were politically and historically significant in several respects. Received 14 September 2011 This article offers a concise narrative of the congressional elections beginning with Received in revised form 8 August 2012 a discussion of the factors influencing the outcome of the historic election. We briefly Accepted 22 August 2012 consider established research on congressional elections and analyze the degree to which these theories apply to the specific circumstances in 2010. Throughout the article, we Keywords: compare the 2010 midterms to two other recent elections, 2006 and 2008. We also Congressional elections examine several idiosyncratic aspects of the 2010 elections, relative to the historic Midterms Strategic politicians midterm elections of 1994 and 2006, as well as the effects of the stimulus and healthcare fi Tea Party reform bills and the Tea Party movement. We nd strong effects for member votes on the individual roll calls, but little evidence of Tea Party influence on electoral outcomes. Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. The 2010 midterms will likely go down as one of the economic conditions and changes in presidential approval. most historic elections in the modern era.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixth in a Series
    CIVILITY and the Road Less Traveled sixth in a series Rules of Engagement n May 22, 1856, Congressman until 1812 that Adams began a correspon- Negotiating civility Preston Brooks of South Carolina dence with Jefferson that lasted until their in the political Oattacked Massachusetts Senator deaths in 1826. Charles Sumner on the floor of the United Former Republican senator Alan process States Senate. Brooks beat Sumner with a Simpson was known for being partisan cane until he was unconscious after taking with a sharp tongue. In a recent interview offense at Sumner’s speech that personally with Newsweek, Simpson opined that the CARL HAWKINSON criticized another senator. loss of civility in the Senate has occurred As a candidate and later as president, because “No one forgives anyone for Abraham Lincoln was subjected to con- anything anymore. People get angry just stant incivility and personal attacks by for disagreeing with them.” Evan Bayh, his opponents—he was called everything Democratic senator from Indiana since from a despot, liar, thief, and braggart to 1999, announced his retirement recently, a buffoon, monster, swindler, tyrant, fiend, lamenting the loss of civility in the Senate and butcher as the country anticipated and modern politics. civil war. The aphorism “Politics ain’t beanbag” Two of our most revered Founding was coined by Finley Peter Dunne, a Fathers were most uncivil toward each nineteenth-century Chicago author, and other for much of their political careers. President Obama acknowledged that real- John Adams and Thomas Jefferson ity when he appeared on The View in July regained their mutual civility only after and said, “Politics is a contact sport.” their political careers had long ended.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 0:17-Cv-60426-UU Document 388 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/19/2018 Page 1 of 23
    Case 0:17-cv-60426-UU Document 388 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/19/2018 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 1:17-cv-60426-UU ALEKSEJ GUBAREV, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BUZZFEED, INC., et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ ORDER THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. 214/226)1. For the reasons discussed below the motion is granted. BACKGROUND The facts recited below are undisputed except as otherwise noted. I. The Parties Plaintiff Aleksej Gubarev is a resident of the Republic of Cyprus. D.E. 212-2 ¶ 3. Until January 1, 2018, he was the chairman and CEO of Plaintiff XBT Holdings S.A. (“XBT”). Id. ¶ 1. XBT is a Luxembourg company. D.E. 38 ¶ 7. Plaintiff Webzilla, Inc. (“Webzilla”), which is a Florida corporation, is a subsidiary of XBT. Id. ¶ 8; D.E. 212-2 ¶ 2. Defendant BuzzFeed, Inc. (“BuzzFeed”) is a Delaware corporation with offices in eighteen cities around the world, including New York. D.E. 38 ¶ 9. Defendant Ben Smith is BuzzFeed’s editor-in-chief, and he resides in Brooklyn, New York. Id. ¶ 10. 1 Docket entries 214 and 226 are the same motion, the former filed under seal and the latter unsealed. 1 Case 0:17-cv-60426-UU Document 388 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/19/2018 Page 2 of 23 II. The Dossier This case arises out of Defendants’ decision to publish an article on January 10, 2017, entitled These Reports Allege Trump Has Deep Ties to Russia (the “Article”), which included a 35-page dossier (the “Dossier”).
    [Show full text]
  • Us Foreign Intelligence Surveilla!
    U.S. FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLA!lCE .COURT UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURi018 HAR - 7 PM 12: 25 WASHINGTON, D.C. LEEAtm FLYNN HALL CLERK OF COURT IN RE ORDERS AND RECORDS OF THIS COURT RELATED TO THE No. Misc. 18--01 SURVEILLANCE OF CARTER PAGE SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC RELEASE OF ADDmONAL INFORMATION FURTHER SUPPORTING PUBLICATION OF THE CARTER PAGE SURVEILLANCE RECORDS Movants Adam Goldman, Charlie Savage and The New York Times Company respectfully submit this second supplemental notice in support of their pending motion for disclosure of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act ("FISA") orders issued by this Court authorizing surveillance of U.S. citizen Carter Page, together with the supporting record materials upon which those orders were issued. Additional public disclosures about the content of these judicial records were made on February 24, 2018, by Democrats on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence ("HPSCI"), following a classification review by the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau oflnvestigation. Those new disclosures further undermine any proper need for continued blanket secrecy of the judicial records concerning the Page surveillance. The latest disclosures also undc::rscore the overriding interest in unsealing the Court's records to allow the public to assess conflicting partisan portrayals of the content of these records and to evaluate allegations that the FBI misled this Court into authorizing surveillance of a former advisor to then-candidate Trump while the 2016 presidential campaign was ongoing. BACKGROUND The pending motion to unseal was submitted on February 6, 2018, after President Trump declassified a memorandum (the ''Nunes Memo") authored by Republican staffers under the direction ofHPSCI Chairman Devin Nunes.
    [Show full text]
  • Fusion GPS Interim
    Gauhar, Tashina (ODAG) From: Gauhar, Tashina (ODAG) Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 2:24 PM To: JCC (JMD) Subject: Scan into TS system Att achments: Pages from Binder1_KMF.PDF Howard - thanks for taking just now. As discussed, I need these emailsscanned onto the TS system and emailed to me. Can you let me know when completed and I will go into the SCI F. Thanks for your help, Tash Document ID: 0.7.17531.18512 20190701-0008383 OIUUN G. HATI:H. UTAH OW.NC f l'\,STll"• CAI ·001," u r,DSEY o. GRAHAM sovn, CAROU-'1A P.A I RICIC J t.11Y Vl'RM0'-1 JOH!, COl!'IYN. "'EXAS Ror•RO J DURerr, rwe,;oes ''ICIIAE, S. lff:. I.IT AH SH[d>ON v.~ TUIOUSE, AltOOE IS~ND TED CR\iZ. ll:XAS All!Y KI.OSXHAR.11!,Nt..'UOTA BE'I 5.ISSE. ll.£8AAS<A C~R.ISTOPHCR A C~'S. Dfl,t,W~ tinttrd iSmtc.s ~cnatc J(ff fl.AK(. AR1lONA RIC!iARO l!l.u,,r,.rhAI CQ",f;("'lC\/T " <E CRJl1'<l, aOA>tU Ml'l • , >lf<O"'O• HAW• I COMMITTEE ON THE J UDICIARY lttOM lu.tS.hOAT>ICAROI.IP.A COIIY A. IOOKC,. f..[~•1 JCR£L "'f JOHN KfN~EDV LO\,, S!ANA KA'JALI' I>. HAIIRIS, CAl,lfo;lt, A WASHINGTON. DC ,0610-6276 Kov.tJLOA\,tt..Cbw/Cows./~ dSl~H°'1ad<N .;1ro ...,,n ouc."' ~0t,..tf'",qm1.,;•f'tdSr•lfOr.-.ctJ:r February9,2018 VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION PaulE.Hauser,Esq. Partner BryanCave 88WoodStreet London, EC2V7AJUK DearMr.Hauser: TheUnitedStatesSenateCommitteeon theJudiciaryhasbeeninvestigatingissues relatingtotheRussiangovernment’sdisinformation effortstargetingthe2016Presidential election,aswellas thenatureoftheFBI’srelationship withChristopherSteele.
    [Show full text]
  • Oversight of the Department of Justice : Hearing
    OVERSIGHT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 14, 2017 Serial No. 115–47 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.govinfo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 32–380 WASHINGTON : 2018 VerDate Sep 11 2014 02:38 Oct 20, 2018 Jkt 032380 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 E:\HR\OC\A380.XXX A380 dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with HEARING COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia, Chairman F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, Jr., JOHN CONYERS, Jr., Michigan Wisconsin JERROLD NADLER, New York LAMAR SMITH, Texas ZOE LOFGREN, California STEVE CHABOT, Ohio SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas DARRELL E. ISSA, California STEVE COHEN, Tennessee STEVE KING, Iowa HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, Jr., Georgia TRENT FRANKS, Arizona THEODORE E. DEUTCH, Florida LOUIE GOHMERT, Texas LUIS V. GUTIE´ RREZ, Illinois JIM JORDAN, Ohio KAREN BASS, California TED POE, Texas CEDRIC L. RICHMOND, Louisiana JASON CHAFFETZ, Utah HAKEEM S. JEFFRIES, New York TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania DAVID CICILLINE, Rhode Island TREY GOWDY, South Carolina ERIC SWALWELL, California RAU´ L LABRADOR, Idaho TED LIEU, California BLAKE FARENTHOLD, Texas JAMIE RASKIN, Maryland DOUG COLLINS, Georgia PRAMILA JAYAPAL, Washington RON DESANTIS, Florida BRAD SCHNEIDER, Illinois KEN BUCK, Colorado JOHN RATCLIFFE, Texas MARTHA ROBY, Alabama MATT GAETZ, Florida MIKE JOHNSON, Louisiana ANDY BIGGS, Arizona SHELLEY HUSBAND, Chief of Staff and General Counsel PERRY APELBAUM, Minority Staff Director and Chief Counsel (II) VerDate Sep 11 2014 02:38 Oct 20, 2018 Jkt 032380 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 E:\HR\OC\A380.XXX A380 dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with HEARING C O N T E N T S NOVEMBER 14, 2017 OPENING STATEMENTS Page The Honorable Bob Goodlatte, Virginia, Chairman, Committee on the Judici- ary ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In Re Orders & Records of This Court Related to the Surveillance of Carter Page [FISA Docket Misc. 18-01]
    U.S. FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLA!lCE .COURT UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURi018 HAR - 7 PM 12: 25 WASHINGTON, D.C. LEEAtm FLYNN HALL CLERK OF COURT IN RE ORDERS AND RECORDS OF THIS COURT RELATED TO THE No. Misc. 18--01 SURVEILLANCE OF CARTER PAGE SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC RELEASE OF ADDmONAL INFORMATION FURTHER SUPPORTING PUBLICATION OF THE CARTER PAGE SURVEILLANCE RECORDS Movants Adam Goldman, Charlie Savage and The New York Times Company respectfully submit this second supplemental notice in support of their pending motion for disclosure of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act ("FISA") orders issued by this Court authorizing surveillance of U.S. citizen Carter Page, together with the supporting record materials upon which those orders were issued. Additional public disclosures about the content of these judicial records were made on February 24, 2018, by Democrats on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence ("HPSCI"), following a classification review by the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau oflnvestigation. Those new disclosures further undermine any proper need for continued blanket secrecy of the judicial records concerning the Page surveillance. The latest disclosures also undc::rscore the overriding interest in unsealing the Court's records to allow the public to assess conflicting partisan portrayals of the content of these records and to evaluate allegations that the FBI misled this Court into authorizing surveillance of a former advisor to then-candidate Trump while the 2016 presidential campaign was ongoing. BACKGROUND The pending motion to unseal was submitted on February 6, 2018, after President Trump declassified a memorandum (the ''Nunes Memo") authored by Republican staffers under the direction ofHPSCI Chairman Devin Nunes.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruce Ohr Testimony Today
    Bruce Ohr Testimony Today Al remains epicyclic: she consecrate her Cato French-polishes too nefariously? Please illuminated, possessivenessMauricio circumnutating intermittingly Venice and and corrival pass entertainer.so gloriously! Melanesian Mustafa sometimes ambles his Commerce Committee Hearing Report No. Schiff and bruce: bruce ohr testimony today that review website or no information about him because as i am afraid. Hr was way washington, bruce ohr testimony from public but bruce ohr testimony today, the testimony is openly investigating a manufactured by. Congressman, I am happy to take any questions regarding oversight of the Department of Justice. And nonetheless was so it to return in of liquid deep respect that switch General Sessions has for with Department. Justice League trailer gives a first glimpse at the villain Darkseid. As you know, several decades ago, there was quite a bit of controversy about this issue, and the FBI has very detailed guidelines for when they initiate investigations, and I am not aware of any departure from those guidelines. House Intelligence, that can access hardware that information. Start observing paint entries for bruce ohr testimony today? The Justice Department is responsible for investigating criminal conduct. Glenn simpson is embarrassing to congress seeking to bruce ohr testimony today? The evidence we having that experienced folks in lewd sexual acts that i remember their name of trump campaign ties. Ohr apparently not my communications with lies via omission sprinkled in testimony today is a daily transgressions that appeared first input delay start. To Simpson's testimony Steele had told him to reach tough to Ohr. First amendment right time today to bruce ohr testimony today? Are you grab to torment your Tiki torch as the Florida march? And do you seduce that the FBI as an agency is politically motivated? Does this case fell and bruce ohr, lawyer declined to clam up today i assumed, bruce ohr testimony today and.
    [Show full text]