DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Hoquiam Permit Review 40600-HS-PER-55037 Revision 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Hoquiam Permit Review 40600-HS-PER-55037 Revision 3 City of Hoquiam Permit Review 40600-HS-PER-55037 Revision 3 Proposed Grays Harbor Potash Export Facility Prepared for State Environmental Policy Act Checklist BHP Prepared by WSP USA A17.0202.00 31 July 2019 City of Hoquiam Planning and Building Division 609 8th St. Hoquiam, WA 98550-3522 Tel: 360-532-5700 ext. 211, Fax: 360-538-0938 Website: www.cityofhoquiam.com Table of Contents Section Page A. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................. 2 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ................................................................................................... 15 1. EARTH ...................................................................................................................................... 15 2. AIR ........................................................................................................................................... 22 3. WATER ..................................................................................................................................... 31 4. PLANTS ..................................................................................................................................... 57 5. ANIMALS .................................................................................................................................. 64 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES .......................................................................................... 81 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ........................................................................................................ 82 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE ..................................................................................................... 100 9. HOUSING ................................................................................................................................ 109 10. AESTHETICS .......................................................................................................................... 109 11. LIGHT AND GLARE ................................................................................................................. 110 12. RECREATION ......................................................................................................................... 112 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION ............................................................................. 116 14. TRANSPORTATION ................................................................................................................ 122 15. PUBLIC SERVICES................................................................................................................... 129 16. UTILITIES .............................................................................................................................. 129 C. SIGNATURE .............................................................................................................................. 130 References .................................................................................................................................. 132 i of iii July 2019 LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers ASIL Acceptable Source Impact Level BACT best available control technologies BMPs best management practices CFR Code of Federal Regulations CUP Conditional Use Permit DAHP Washington State Department of Historic Preservation DMMO Dredged Material Management Office DMMP Dredged Material Management Program DNR Washington State Department of Natural Resources DPM diesel particulate matter DPSs Distinct Population Segments Ecology Washington State Department of Ecology EFH Essential Fish Habitat EIS Environmental Impact Statement ELLW extreme low low water EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act ESUs Evolutionarily Significant Units FAA Federal Aviation Administration FEIS Final Environmental Impact Statement FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map GHG greenhouse gas GHNWR Grays Harbor National Wildlife Refuge GIS geographic information system HAPs hazardous air pollutants HIA Health Impact Assessment HMC Hoquiam Municipal Code IDA Dark-Sky Association IES Illuminating Engineering Society IHA Incidental Harassment Authorization IMSBC International Maritime Solid Bulk Cargoes JARPA Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application KCl potassium chloride Ldn lowest-measured day-night average sound level LWD Large woody debris MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act MHHW mean higher high water MLLW mean lower low water mtpa million metric tons per annum NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NEHRP National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program ii of iii July 2019 NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOC Notice of Construction NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service NRHP National Register of Historic Places NSPS new source performance standards OHWM Ordinary high water mark ORCAA Olympic Region Clean Air Agency PHS Priority Habitat and Species PM particulate matter PSAP Puget Sound and Pacific Railroad Quinault Quinault Indian Nation RCW Revised Code of Washington SEPA State Environmental Policy Act SLM Sound level meter SPCC spill prevention, control, and countermeasures SQERs Small Quantity Emission Rates SR State Route SWPPP stormwater pollution prevention plan TAP toxic air pollutant TESC temporary erosion and sediment control UPRR Union Pacific Railroad USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USCG U.S. Coast Guard USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service WAC Washington Administrative Code WDFW Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife WISAARD Washington Information System for Architectural and Archaeological Records Database WQC Water Quality Certification iii of iii July 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write, “do not know” or “does not apply.” Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered “does not apply.” IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words “project,” “applicant,” and “property or site” should be read as “proposal,” “proposer,” and “affected geographic area,” respectively. 1 of 135 July 2019 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Grays Harbor Potash Export Facility 2. Name of applicant: BHP Billiton Canada, Inc. (BHP) 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Val Bond BHP 130 Third Avenue South Saskatoon, SK S7K 1L3 306-385-8400 4. Date checklist prepared: July 2019 Note: The SEPA checklist for the proposed project was originally prepared and submitted in August 2017. It was revised in December 2017 to incorporate the proposed mitigation plan and revised wetland delineation and supplemented with an addendum in August 2018. Please see the SEPA Executive Summary (BHP July 2019) for a summary of changes to the proposed project and analysis conducted. This version replaces all prior versions of the SEPA checklist. 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Hoquiam 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction of the project is proposed to start in 2020 and end in 2024/2025. Operations are proposed to start in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • City of Aberdeen Water System Plan DRAFT
    City of Aberdeen Water System Plan DRAFT November 2020 Prepared By: HDR Engineering, Inc. 606 Columbia Street NW, Suite 200 Olympia, WA 98501 (360) 570-4400 November 2020 Contents 1. Description of Water System .................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Ownership and Management ......................................................................... 1-1 1.2 System Background and History..................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Service Area .................................................................................................. 1-2 1.3.1 General .............................................................................................. 1-2 1.3.2 Service Area Policies and Duty to Serve ............................................. 1-2 1.3.3 Retail Service Area ............................................................................. 1-3 1.3.4 Future Service Area ............................................................................ 1-3 1.4 Adjacent Purveyors ........................................................................................ 1-4 1.5 Inventory of Existing Facilities ........................................................................ 1-6 1.5.1 Transmission System.......................................................................... 1-6 1.5.2 Treatment Facilities ............................................................................ 1-6 1.5.3 Finished Water Storage Facilities .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The 2005 Coastal Cutthroat Trout Symposium
    THE 2005 COASTAL CUTTHROAT TROUT SYMPOSIUM Status, Management, Biology, and Conservation Major support for the 2005 Coastal Cutthroat Trout Symposium was provided by Oregon Chapter of the Pacific States Marine U.S. Fish and Wildlife American Fisheries Society Fisheries Commission Service Additional support for the symposium and for publication of these proceedings was provided by North Pacific International Chapter AFS Humboldt Chapter AFS Alaska Chapter AFS American Fisheries Society South Sound Flyfishers Clark-Skamania Flyfishers Lower Columbia Flyfishers Washington Fly Fishing Club Port Townsend Chapter of Trout Unlimited Fine Art and Books for Raffle and Auction provided by Washington Trout G. Loomis Bruce Ferguson Les Johnson THE 2005 COASTAL CUTTHROAT TROUT SYMPOSIUM Status, Management, Biology, and Conservation Proceedings of a Workshop Fort Worden State Park Port Townsend, Washington September 29-October 1, 2005 Edited by Patrick J. Connolly, Thomas H. Williams, and Robert E. Gresswell Published by Oregon Chapter of the American Fisheries Society Portland, Oregon 2008 Suggested citation formats: Entire book Connolly, P. J., T. H. Williams, and R. E. Gresswell, editors. 2008. The 2005 coastal cutthroat trout symposium: status, management, biology, and conservation. Oregon Chapter, American Fisheries Society, Portland. Article within book Anderson, J. D. 2008. Coastal cutthroat trout in Washington state: status and management. Pages 11-23 in P. J. Connolly, T. H. Williams, and R. E. Gresswell, editors. The 2005 coastal cutthroat
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Coast Sustainable Salmon Plan Page I
    WASHINGTON COAST SUSTAINABLE SALMON PLAN May 7, 2013 The Washington Coast Sustainable Salmon Partnership P.O. Box 2392, Ocean Shores, WA 98569 360-289-2499 www.wcssp.org This document was made possible with funding from Washington’s Salmon Recovery Funding Board. This document is also available online at www.wcssp.org There are points and references in this Plan – data, statistics, ESA requirements and recovery strategies – that some tribes in the Coast Region do not agree with. This Plan does not, nor is it intended to, interfere with or diminish tribal policy. WCSSP respects tribal sovereignty and strives to work cooperatively and respectfully with Coastal Tribes toward common objectives. May 7, 2013 Washington Coast Sustainable Salmon Plan Page i CONTENTS List of Figures and Tables ...................................................................................................... vi Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 1 Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................. 2 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 5 Salmon Sustainability........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Goals ........................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Cutthroat Trout in Washington State: Status and Management
    Coastal Cutthroat Trout in Washington State: Status and Management Jon. D. Anderson Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Fish Program, 600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, Washington 98501- 1091 [email protected] Introduction The coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki clarki) inhabits a diverse and ecologically varied suite of habitats in Washington State. Cutthroat have responded to this variability, as evidenced by their exhibiting four basic life history forms (Wydoski and Whitney 2003), anadromous, adfluvial, fluvial and resident. A summary of the status of the anadromous form of coastal cutthroat trout in Washington State was published by Leider (1997). The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) completed the salmonid stock inventory (SaSI) assessment process for coastal cutthroat trout (Blakley et al. 2000), which expanded upon the Washington Department of Game Sea-Run Cutthroat Status Report (DeShazo 1980). In the SaSI, the coastal cutthroat populations were described as “stock complexes”. These complexes were defined as a group of closely related stocks located within a single watershed or other relatively limited geographic area. The number of stocks within a stock complex may never be known with any confidence. The inventory identified 40 coastal cutthroat stock complexes and determined their status (healthy, depressed, critical, unknown or extinct), origin (native, non-native or unknown) and production type (wild, cultured or unknown). This paper is intended to provide updated information subsequent to that paper, and to document the response of the WDFW to the proposed listing of this population under the Endangered Species Act. In response to a petition to list coastal cutthroat trout as threatened or endangered under the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Hoquiam Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan 2020 - 2026
    City of Hoquiam Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan 2020 - 2026 City Officials Mayor: Ben Winkelman City Administrator: Brian Shay Community Services: Tracy Wood City Council Ward 1 Paul McMillian & Dave Wilson Ward 2 Steven Puvogel & Jim George Ward 3 Shannon Patterson & Bill Nelson Ward 4 Greg Grun & Al Dick Ward 5 Denise Anderson & Brenda Carlstrom Ward 6 Elizabeth Reid & Dave Hinchen Grays Harbor Council of Governments Contributing Staff: Executive Director, Vicki Cummings Office/Grant Coordinator, Planner I, Zana Dennis City of Hoquiam Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan 2020-2026 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1 – INTRODUCTION Our Community ........................................................................................................................ 1 Progress Since Previous Plan .................................................................................................... 3 Plan Purpose ............................................................................................................................. 4 Plan Organization ...................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 2 – GOALS AND OBJECTIVES System-Wide Goal .................................................................................................................... 5 Recreation Sites ........................................................................................................................ 5 Recreation Facilities ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Humptulips Quadrangle and Adjacent Areas
    (I) GEOLOGIC MAP OF (I) I ~ C!> THE HUMPTULIPS QUADRANGLE Q. < :E AND ADJACENT AREAS, (.) C!> GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY, WASHINGTON 0 ..J 0 w C, BY WELDON W. RAU 1986 GEOLOGIC MAP GM-33 •• WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT or ~~~=~ Natural Resources Brtan eoyi,. • C"'1lltUSSJoMt ot Publie Lands An Sleams • SupervLSOr Division ol Geology and E(rtfh Re10Utet!! Raymond LasmaN1. Sta"' Geologut Printed In the United States of America For sale by the Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington Price $ 2.78 .22 tax $ 3.00 Brtw, BO\"le • Coinmis&looor <JI f>u blk; t.wxi. Ar1 Slearn< • 5ull<l,-,.•t.o,- Geologic Map WASHINGTON STATE D~ARTMENT OF Dbtl*-1 o! GeolCVI' a.-.d Earth Resource> Natural Resources RayrnoM i.,,.....,n,.. Slcrta ~~ GM-33 probably most extensive during the Oeposition of the upper part of the formatio n. Hoh rocks of this area are likely no younger than the middle Eocene Ulatisian Stage. Northern outcrops of the Montesano Formation continue westw ard from the Hoh rocks of the 00/lSlal area are known to contain foraminifers ranging in age from Wynoochee Valley quadrangle, forming a belt of ou1crop extending to the East Fork miOdlc Eocene to middle Miocene. gf the Hoquiam Rive r. The formation is ma;t extensively c,;poscd in the southeastern part of the mapped area, mainly along the Ea.st Fo rk of the Hoquiam Ri~er and along the Wishkah River and itJ lower tributaries. In aOdilion, the format ion is particularly INTRUSIVE ROCKS (Ti) well exposed in the hill s within the cities of Aberdeen and Hoquiam.
    [Show full text]
  • Chehalis River Basin Draft Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan
    DRAFT Chehalis River Basin Draft Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan May 2010 Prepared for: Prepared by: Chehalis River Basin Flood Authority ESA Adolfson Chehalis River Basin Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan ACRONYMS AF acre feet BA Biological Assessment BE Biological Evaluation BMC Bucoda Municipal Code BMP Best Management Practice CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CFHMP Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan CFR Code of Federal Regulations CFRP Centralia Flood Reduction Project cfs cubic feet per second CMC Chehalis Municipal Code COE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Corps U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CMZ Channel Migration Zone CRS Community Rating System CTED Community, Trade, and Economic Development CWA Clean Water Act CWPO Closed Without Payment DOE Department of Ecology DST Decision Support Tool Ecology Washington State Department of Ecology EIS Environmental Impact Statement EO Executive Order EPA Environmental Protection Agency ER Emergency Response ESA Endangered Species Act ESSB Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill FCAAP Flood Control Assistance Account Program FEMA Federal Emergency Management Association FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FHWA Federal Highway Administration FIA Federal Insurance Administration FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map FMA Flood Mitigation Assistant grant program FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact GI General Investigation GIS Geographic Information System GMA Growth Management Act GO General Obligation HEC-RAS Hydrologic Engineering Centers River Analysis System HHS Human Health
    [Show full text]
  • WDFW 2000 Washington State Salmonid Stock Inventory (SASSI)
    2000 WASHINGTON STATE SALMONID STOCK INVENTORY COASTAL CUTTHROAT TROUT Ann Blakley Bob Leland Jim Ames Editors WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE June 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..................................................... iii INTRODUCTION ...........................................................1 TRANSBOUNDARY COASTAL CUTTHROAT ...................................49 SUMAS ............................................................49 NORTH PUGET SOUND COASTAL CUTTHROAT ................................53 NORTH PUGET SOUND TRIBS .........................................53 NOOKSACK .........................................................57 WHATCOM CREEK ..................................................61 SAMISH ............................................................65 SKAGIT COASTAL CUTTHROAT .............................................69 SKAGIT ............................................................69 STILLAGUAMISH COASTAL CUTTHROAT .....................................73 STILLAGUAMISH ....................................................73 SNOHOMISH COASTAL CUTTHROAT .........................................79 SNOHOMISH ........................................................79 GREEN RIVER COASTAL CUTTHROAT .......................................85 DUWAMISH/GREEN ..................................................85 PUYALLUP COASTAL CUTTHROAT ..........................................91 PUYALLUP .........................................................91 NISQUALLY COASTAL CUTTHROAT ..........................................95
    [Show full text]
  • State-Of-The-River Report for the Chehalis River Basin 2006
    STATE-OF-THE-RIVER REPORT FOR THE CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN 2006 - 2009 A Water Quality Study Joel Green, Ph.D. Don Loft, B.A. Randy Lehr, Ph.D. Grays Harbor College 1620 Edward P. Smith Drive Aberdeen, WA 98520 Contributors: Chehalis Basin Partnership, Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation and Washington State Department of Ecology Funded by: Washington State Department of Ecology, Grays Harbor College and the Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation September 14, 2009 Executive Summary To better manage the Chehalis Basin, it is important to understand water quality in the Chehalis River and its tributaries. Previous studies throughout the Chehalis Basin have suggested that ambient water quality conditions range widely, and the primary water quality parameters of concern are temperature, dissolved oxygen, fecal coliform, pH and turbidity due to sediment runoff. To advance knowledge of water quality in the Chehalis Basin, we initiated a study in 2006 to collect and analyze water samples from 83 sites on a monthly basis for dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, turbidity, and fecal coliform. During 2008, the number of sites was expanded to 94. The project was a collaborative effort of Grays Harbor College, which was responsible for study design, analysis, and reporting, and the Chehalis Tribal Natural Resources Department, which was responsible for collecting water samples and conducting chemical analyses of samples. The criteria used to evaluate water quality were based on Washington State standards (173-201A WAC). The rationale for these standards is that water quality meeting the standards provides for the habitat needs of fish and other aquatic life, provides a safe environment for people engaged in water recreation, and provides for the production of healthy and safe seafood.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife
    Friday, July 5, 2002 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Withdrawal of Proposed Rule To List the Southwestern Washington/ Columbia River Distinct Population Segment of the Coastal Cutthroat Trout as Threatened; Proposed Rule VerDate May<23>2002 11:50 Jul 03, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\05JYP2.SGM pfrm17 PsN: 05JYP2 44934 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 129 / Friday, July 5, 2002 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Trotter 1997) and inland from the Coast intermittent, especially during the Range of Alaska to roughly the crest of summer (Johnson et al. 1999). Fish and Wildlife Service the Cascades of Washington and Oregon Coastal cutthroat trout differ in (Trotter 1997). The southwestern appearance from other subspecies by the 50 CFR Part 17 Washington/Columbia River DPS numerous small to medium irregularly- shaped spots evenly covering virtually RIN 1018–AF45 proposed for listing as threatened includes the Columbia River and its the entire sides of the body, often Endangered and Threatened Wildlife tributaries from the mouth to the extending to the ventral surface and and Plants; Withdrawal of Proposed Klickitat River on the Washington side anal fin (Behnke 1992). Skin color on Rule To List the Southwestern of the river and Fifteenmile Creek on the sea-run fish is often silvery, and may Washington/Columbia River Distinct Oregon side; the Willamette River and mask body spots, while freshwater Population Segment of the Coastal its tributaries from its confluence with residents are darker with a copper or Cutthroat Trout as Threatened the Columbia upstream to Willamette brassy sheen.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.10 Grays Harbor Tributaries Ecological Region
    Ecological Regions: Grays Harbor Tributaries Ecological Region 5.10 Grays Harbor Tributaries Ecological Region 5.10.1 Overview The Grays Harbor Tributaries Ecological Region encompasses the tributaries that directly enter Grays Harbor (other than the Chehalis River) and the Wishkah River that enters the Chehalis River at RM 0 (Figure 5-19). This ecological region encompasses more than 600 square miles (nearly 385,000 acres) and represents approximately 22% of the overall Chehalis Basin. The ecological region is diverse, with drainages from the Olympic Mountains and lower Coast Range areas. The highest point in this ecological region is Gibson Peak at 4,390 feet. The Humptulips Important Features and Functions River arises in two forks within the Olympic National • The amount of tidally influenced Forest at about 3,000 feet in elevation and flows for freshwater wetland with Sitka spruce 60 miles to Grays Harbor. The Hoquiam River arises in swamp in the ecological region is unique in the basin and much different from the the low foothills of the Olympic Mountains in three deciduous-dominated forest in the forks at about 400 feet in elevation; the East Fork Chehalis River Tidal Ecological Region. Hoquiam River is the longest and flows for 17 miles. A • The maritime climate provides a year- significant part of the Middle Fork and West Fork round buffer to air (and water) temperatures. Hoquiam rivers are within the City of Hoquiam • The Humptulips River sub-basin municipal watershed. The Wishkah River arises in the characteristics are important and unique: foothills of the Olympic Mountains at about these feature a smaller percentage of the 1,200 feet in elevation; the upper watershed of the total length in tidewater, substantial spawning gravel, and close proximity to Wishkah River is within the City of Aberdeen’s the ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon and Steelhead Habitat Limiting Factors: Chehalis Basin and Nearby Drainages, Water Resource Inventory Areas 22 and 23
    SALMON AND STEELHEAD HABITAT LIMITING FACTORS CHEHALIS BASIN AND NEARBY DRAINAGES WATER RESOURCE INVENTORY AREAS 22 AND 23 WASHINGTON STATE CONSERVATION COMMISSION FINAL REPORT Carol J. Smith, Ph.D. Washington State Conservation Commission 300 Desmond Drive Lacey, Washington 98503 And Mark Wenger Columbia Pacific RC&D Aberdeen, Washington May, 2001 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was developed by the WRIA 22 and 23 Technical Advisory Group for Salmonid Habitat Limiting Factors. Their expertise and cooperation made this report possible. Participants included: Bob Amrine, Lewis Conservation District Bruce Baxter, WA Dept. Fish and Wildlife Scott Brummer, Thurston Conservation District Lonnie Crumley, LWC Consulting Brian Erickson, Columbia Pacific RC&D Doug Fricke, Chehalis Fisheries Task Force Craig Graber, WA Dept. Ecology Lee Hansmann, Grays Harbor County Kahle Jennings, WA Dept. Ecology Mike Kelley, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mike Madsen, Mason Conservation District Mike McGinnis, Chehalis Indian Tribe Osa Odum, NWIFC, SHHIAP John Penberth, Chehalis Basin Partnership Jim Park, WA Dept. Transportation John Sims, Quinault Indian Nation Margaret Rader, Chehalis Basin Partnership Dr. Carol Smith, WA Conservation Commission Chad Stussy, WA Dept. Fish and Wildlife Mark Wenger, Columbia Pacific RC&D Ron Wisner, Grays Harbor Conservation District In addition, an additional committee was formed to develop the prioritization processes. This committee was comprised of technical and non-technical participants, who included: Bob Amrine, Lewis Conservation District Brian Blake, Dept. Corrections, Stafford Creek Facility Lonnie Crumley, LWC Consulting Earl Emerson, Thurston County Citizen Brian Erickson, Columbia Pacific RC&D Doug Fricke, Chehalis Fisheries Task Force Craig Graber, WA Dept. Ecology Lee Hansmann, Grays Harbor County Kahle Jennings, WA Dept.
    [Show full text]