DOCSLIB.ORG

Robert Armijo, City Engineer From: Jim Nelson Subject

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Robert Armijo, City Engineer From: Jim Nelson Subject TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (FINAL VERSION) Date: October 8, 2019 To: Robert Armijo, City Engineer From: Jim Nelson Subject: Supplement No. 3 to Citywide Storm Drainage Master Plan Lammers and Mountain House Watersheds SWC File: 2014-96CC This Technical Memorandum and its supporting exhibits and tables present Supplement No. 3 to the Citywide Storm Drainage Master Plan (SDMP) that was adopted by the Tracy City Council on April 16, 2013 by Resolution No. 2013-056. This supplement has been prepared to revise and update components of the storm drainage infrastructure plan for the Lammers and Mountain House Watersheds in the City’s Sphere of Influence. The primary reasons for preparing this Supplement No. 3 to the Citywide SDMP at this time include the following: • The alignment of selected segments of the Lammers Outfall Storm Drain system is proposed to be altered. Alterations will include a northerly shift of some storm drain segments to follow the south side of Eleventh Street to more efficiently follow existing topography and allow certain storm drain and sanitary sewer trunk lines to align parallel and contiguous to each other to improve efficiency of construction and maintenance. • Extensive development has occurred in this area since the current Citywide SDMP was adopted, and an update is needed to allow for official adoption of minor changes in Sub-basin boundaries and Supplement No. 3 to Citywide Storm Drainage Master Plan (FINAL VERSION) Lammers and Mountain House Watersheds To: Robert Armijo, City Engineer October 8, 2019 Page 2 detention basin sizes and locations associated with proposed storm drainage infrastructure. • The revisions herein may improve opportunities to accelerate the construction of the Lammers Outfall Storm Drain System, facilitating the conversion of several existing temporary retention basins serving existing development to detention basins having a positive drainage outflow. Proposed revisions and updates to the Citywide SDMP presented herein have been supported by additional hydrologic and hydraulic calculations, additional investigation of physical conditions and input from City staff. Exhibit A is a portion of Figure 5-1A from the Citywide SDMP that depicts the existing adopted storm drainage plan for the broader portion of the City where changes and updates are being proposed with this Supplement No. 3. The area to be served includes Cordes Ranch, various International Park of Commerce existing and proposed development areas, the property formerly known as the Gateway property, and other properties in the area. Proposed updates to program storm drainage infrastructure and minor adjustments to Sub-basins and Watershed boundaries proposed per this Supplement No. 3 to the Citywide SDMP are depicted and listed on Exhibit B and include the following: • Changes to the alignment of selected segments of the Lammers Outfall Storm Drain system. • Minor Sub-basin changes (L17A/L17B, transfer 22 acres of the Mountain House Watershed into the Lammers Watershed, L20/L14). • DET MWH3a/3b/3c storage volume is reduced from 37 acre- feet (AF) to 33 AF due to a 22 acre reduction in the contributing drainage area per the watershed adjustment cited above. Supplement No. 3 to Citywide Storm Drainage Master Plan (FINAL VERSION) Lammers and Mountain House Watersheds To: Robert Armijo, City Engineer October 8, 2019 Page 3 • DET LW6 storage volume is increased from 101 AF to 103 AF due to minor sub-basin changes (L20/L14). • DET LW9a storage volume is increased from 89 AF to 94 AF due to minor sub-basin changes (L17A/L17B) and watershed adjustments. • DET LW8 is no longer depicted as a linear basin. • DET LW10A, LW10B, LW9a and LW6 have minor location or configuration changes. • DET LW3 is shown as an aggregate basin not located as of yet and will become three (3) or so smaller basins to be determined by the Specific Plan process for the property formerly known as Gateway. • DET LW4 and LW5 will drain to the existing Lammers Road street storm drain system and/or future onsite storm drainage facilities serving the property formerly known as Gateway that will be directed to DET LW3; DET LW4 and LW5 (1 cfs outflow, total) will be “pass through” drainage in DET LW3 and will not affect the DET LW3 storage volume. Also, the following statement contained at the top of page 5.22 in the Citywide SDMP relevant to new development within the Mountain House Watershed is proposed to be changed from: New development within the Mountain House Watershed will not be allowed by the City prior to the execution of said agreement. (“Said agreement” refers to a future drainage agreement with Mountain House CSD). to: New development within the Mountain House Watershed will not be allowed to discharge to downstream facilities operated by the Mountain House CSD Supplement No. 3 to Citywide Storm Drainage Master Plan (FINAL VERSION) Lammers and Mountain House Watersheds To: Robert Armijo, City Engineer October 8, 2019 Page 4 unless an agreement that authorizes said discharge is executed between the City and the Mountain House CSD. Supplement No. 3 does not alter the following relevant components of the Citywide SDMP as it pertains to the subject area: • The 2010 Drainage Agreement Between the City of Tracy and The West Side Irrigation District • Outflow rates from detention basins proposed to serve this area (except for a DET LW3 outflow increase from 4 cfs to 5 cfs for “pass through” of storm water already stored and detained in DET LW4 and LW5). This Supplement No. 3 to the Citywide Storm Drainage Master Plan also includes updated Opinions of Probable Cost (OPCs) for program storm drainage infrastructure that will serve the Lammers and Mountain House Watersheds. Separate OPCs have been prepared each watershed. These OPCs will be incorporated into an updated impact fee analysis performed by Harris & Associates for these watersheds. Exhibits: Exhibit A – Portion of Figure 5-1A from Existing Citywide Storm Drainage Master Plan Showing Existing and Proposed Storm Drainage Facilities in the City’s Lammers and Mountain House Watersheds Exhibit B – Proposed Revisions to the Existing Citywide Storm Drainage Master Plan per Supplement No. 3 Tables: Table 1 – Opinion of Probable Cost for Program Storm Drainage Infrastructure, Supplement No. 3 to the Citywide SDMP (Lammers Watershed) Table 2 – Opinion of Probable Cost for Program Storm Drainage Infrastructure, Supplement No. 3 to the Citywide SDMP (Mountain House Watershed) Supplement No. 3 to Citywide Storm Drainage Master Plan (FINAL VERSION) Lammers and Mountain House Watersheds To: Robert Armijo, City Engineer October 8, 2019 Page 5 Cc: Andrew Malik, City of Tracy Bill Dean, City of Tracy Al Gali, City of Tracy Ilene Macintire, City of Tracy Nanda Gottiparthy, SNG Associates Mike O’Connor, SNG Associates Alison Bouley, Harris & Associates Sarah McIlroy, Stantec RA 4 8 u EXPANSION DET LW1 WSID SUB M ILR 48" SD o ! W87 ! 4 Scale: 2 48" SD " M 1” = 1,500’ OAD S (if printed full size at 11”x17”) AIN DR W94 ! Von Sosten Rd FILIOS! 4 AIN 2-76"X48" HEPs 42" SD * L23 2-60" SDs 2- CATELLUS 60" SD W 60" s WSID LOWER MAIN CANA IR D! R S " BERG/BYRON8 4 4 2- d 8" 60 S " S DET LW2 D Ds D S ! R D " S ! 6 " 3 !24 0 " 3 B S D n D ! S D ^_ D S S 0" " D " 3 e 2 - 10' x 10' CBCs 4 4 S 2 30 2 " S 29" x 18" CMPA " * s 6 DET MHW3cV 3 DET MHW3b18" SDFM * 36" x 22" CMPA L22 L BERG/B * n = * 2 - 6' x 3' CBC W86 30" RCP 36" x 22" CMPA BRIGHT D a S * MH3 DET LW8 " 36" RCPD Culvert * Eleventh St 4 DET MHW3a 2 H V 12" SD D 54 2 - 5' x 5' CBCs ! ! L18 30" SD 48" SD V DELTA MENDOTA CANAL L19 W83 ! D D S ! DET LW7 1 " 2" 2 12" SD ! 24" SD ! SD 4 " SD F RUN 30" SD 18 M 36" RCP Culvert DET MHW2 36 ! " * DET LW9b = SD V L24 DET LW4 W84 GATEWAY D S L17B DET LW3 L20 " MH1 DET LW9a D 0 S 3 WSID UPPER MAIN CANAL " 6 3 PATTERSON L21A CORDES RANCH DET * LW6 V 12" SDFM ! 93" RCP Culvert MH2 DET = W L17A 30" SD LW5 D L14 ! L21 W82 L08 Exhibit A – Portion of Figure 5-1AL21 from Existing Citywide Storm Drainage Master Plan ShowingWESTSID ED 3.5' x 3.5' CBC S Existing and Proposed Storm Drainage Facilities in " * 0 RESIDENTIA3 DET LW10b V the City’sL08 Lammers and Mountaind House Watersheds D L16B DET LW10a S " Supplement No. 3 to the R Citywide SDMP 8 *# 1 L07 Legend from Figure 5-1A: 36" Pipe Overchute L16A s ( Existing Storm Drain r ( ProposedW80 Pump Stations 36" Pipe Overchute Proposed Storm Drain e Subbasins *# 12" SD Existing Detention L15c Watershed Boundaries2 L15d 4" m S DET LW11 Proposed Detention Sphere of Influence D OFF1 DET L15a L13 D WEST 6" S cy_nei_exhibit_A_supplement_3.ai mlm 1-28-2019 DET L15b 3 ! Pipe Change " Existing Channel ! 2 m 1 *# SIDE Overchutes Proposed GreenbeltChannel Parkway Parkway D a D * Culverts V L12 100-yrProposed Floodplain Greenbelt Parkway 78" RCP Culvert INDUSTRIAL * Proposed Culverts L 10' x 4' Overchute D DrainProposed Inlet Opento Channel C L15b L15a D L05 ^_ OutfallsL06 Delta Mendota Canal A *# L10 100W45 Fl d l i N P D= DATE: May 2019 O SWC PROJECT NO. 2014-96CC DET LW12 L11 D UNI 45' Bridge 2 - 36" CMPs 3 - 36" HDPEs 10' x 8' Overchute * *V V:\1840\active\184010206\northeast_industrial_area\graphics\tra *# V D 7.5' x 3.5' *VOverchute 4 - 6' x 3' CBCs *# *# D L04 RA 4 8 u EXPANSION DET LW1 WSID SUB M ILR 48" SD o ! W87 ! 4 Scale: 2 48"SD " M 1” = 1,500’ OAD S (if printed full size at 11”x17”) A IN W94 ! Von Sosten Rd D FILIOS! R 4 AIN 2-76"X48" HEPs 42" SD * L23 2-60" SDs 2- CATELLUS 60" S 6 D W 0" s WSID LOWER MAIN CANA IR D! R S " d BERG/BYRON8 4 4 2- R 60 8" " SD SDs DET LW2 D S D! n " ! 6 S " 3 24 0 e ! " 3 B S D D s ! S D ^_ D S S 0" " D " 3 n 2 - 10' x 10' CBCs 4 4 S 2 30 2 " S " * 29" x 18" CMPA a 6 DET MHW3cV 3 DET MHW3b L 18" * * 36" x 22" CMPA H L22 BERG/B SDFM = * 2 - 6' x 3' CBC W86 30" RCP 36" x 22" CMPA BRIGHT D S * MH3 " 36" RCPD Culvert * Eleventh St 4 DET MHW3a 2 DET LW8 V 12" SD 36” SD D 54 2 - 5' x 5' CBCs ! ! ! L18 30” SD 30" SD 48" SD V L19 W83 ! D D S 30” SD DET LW7 DET LW3 2 1 1 " 2" 2 12" SD ! 24" SD ! 24” SD SD 4 ! F RUN M 36" RCP Culvert DET MHW2 DET 36 ! " DELTA MENDOTA* CANAL LW9b = SD V L17B L24 GATEWAY DET LW4 W84 DET L20 24” SD MH1 LW9a D ! S " 6 3 PATTERSON WSID UPPERDET MAIN CANAL L21A CORDES RANCH LW6 * 1 V 18” SD 12" SDFM ! Supplement No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Framework for In-Field Analyses of Performance and Sub-Technique Selection in Standing Para Cross-Country Skiers
    sensors Article Framework for In-Field Analyses of Performance and Sub-Technique Selection in Standing Para Cross-Country Skiers Camilla H. Carlsen 1,*, Julia Kathrin Baumgart 1, Jan Kocbach 1,2, Pål Haugnes 1 , Evy M. B. Paulussen 1,3 and Øyvind Sandbakk 1 1 Centre for Elite Sports Research, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway; [email protected] (J.K.B.); [email protected] (J.K.); [email protected] (P.H.); [email protected] (E.M.B.P.); [email protected] (Ø.S.) 2 NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, 5008 Bergen, Norway 3 Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +47-452-40-788 Abstract: Our aims were to evaluate the feasibility of a framework based on micro-sensor technology for in-field analyses of performance and sub-technique selection in Para cross-country (XC) skiing by using it to compare these parameters between elite standing Para (two men; one woman) and able- bodied (AB) (three men; four women) XC skiers during a classical skiing race. The data from a global navigation satellite system and inertial measurement unit were integrated to compare time loss and selected sub-techniques as a function of speed. Compared to male/female AB skiers, male/female Para skiers displayed 19/14% slower average speed with the largest time loss (65 ± 36/35 ± 6 s/lap) Citation: Carlsen, C.H.; Kathrin found in uphill terrain.
    [Show full text]
  • World Para Nordic Skiing WC Points Winter Season 2019/20
    World Para Nordic Skiing World Cup Overall Rankings Winter Season 2019/20 World Para Nordic Skiing WC Points Winter Season 2019/20 World Cup Overall Rankings Cross Country created by IPC Sport Data Management System Period Start: 2019-07-01 | Period End: 2020-06-30 Women's VI Rank SDMS ID Name NPC Class WC Points Tie Break 1 43739 Khlyzova, Vera RUS B2 600 2 43732 Panferova, Anna RUS B2 560 3 13436 Sakhanenka, Sviatlana BLR B2 515 4 29128 Edlinger, Carina AUT B1 405 5 13605 Lysova, Mikhalina RUS B2 285 6 23918 Galitsyna, Marina RUS B1 258 7 43733 Umrilova, Vlada RUS B3 190 8 13657 Shyshkova, Oksana UKR B2 180 9 35723 Walter, Leonie Maria GER B2 165 10 19064 Klug, Clara GER B1 126 11 43734 Tereshchenkova, Margarita RUS B3 117 12 23987 Smirnova, Iuliia RUS B2 102 13 13525 Hoesch, Vivian GER B1 82 14 35103 Recktenwald, Johanna GER B2 76 15 43740 Razumnaia, Ekaterina RUS B2 66 16 40995 Kapustei, Andriana UKR B2 56 17 44280 Tkachenko, Nataliia UKR B2 52 18 13619 Remizova, Elena RUS B3 48 19 23919 Moshkovskaia, Ekaterina RUS B2 24 20 43742 Berezhnaia, Kseniia RUS B2 20 Women's Standing Rank SDMS ID Name NPC Class WC Points Tie Break 1 31597 Nilsen, Vilde NOR LW4 780 2 23402 Rumyantseva, Ekaterina RUS LW5/7 385 3 19080 Liashenko, Liudmyla UKR LW8 380 4 13643 Batenkova-Bauman, Yuliia UKR LW6 350 5 13648 Kononova, Oleksandra UKR LW8 325 6 29233 Mikheeva, Iuliia RUS LW8 264 7 30463 Faron, Iweta POL LW8 239 8 35400 Wilkie, Natalie CAN LW8 238 9 31663 Konashuk, Bohdana UKR LW8 188 10 20534 Ostroborodko, Anna RUS LW8 177 11 20641 Hudak, Brittany CAN
    [Show full text]
  • THIRU. V. LOGANATHAN, BA, LLB, D.No . 659 / 2020 Dated 16.10
    JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, TIRUTTANI PRESENT : THIRU. V. LOGANATHAN, B.A., L.L.B., D.No . 659 / 2020 Dated 16.10.2020 COVID19 ADVANCE SPECIAL CAUSE LIST, FOR 19.10.2020 (As per the OM. In D.No 5050/A/2020 dated 24.09.2020 of the Hon'ble Principal District Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur) S. Case No. Name of Parties Name of the counsel Date of Stage of the No Hearing case . 1. C.C.No.36/2017 SI of Police App for Prosecution 19.10.2020 Served Tiruttani P.S and summons of Vs Mr.V.Venkatesan Lw1, Lw4 to Babu Lw6 2. C.C.No.332/2013 Inspector of Police App for Prosecution 19.10.2020 Served Thiruvalangadu P.S and summons of Vs Mr.D.Nagaraj Lw12 & Sampathkumar Lw13 3. C.C.No.60/2015 Inspector of Police, App for Prosecution 19.10.2020 Served Thiruvalangadu P.S and summons of Vs Mr.V.Kishore Reddy Lw9 to Lw12 Narasimman (I.O) 4. C.C.2/2015 CCIW-CID App for Prosecution 19.10.2020 Served Tiruvallur and summons of Vs Mr.P.M.Narasimman Lw5 to Lw7 Rajendran 5. C.C.1/2015 CCIW-CID App for Prosecution 19.10.2020 Served Tiruvallur and summons of Vs Mr.P.M.Narasimman Lw5 to Lw7 Rajendran 6. C.C.No.40/2017 SI of Police, App for Prosecution 19.10.2020 Served DCB-Tiruvallur and summons of Vs Mr.V.Kishore Reddy Pw1 to Pw5 Venkatesan for chief continuation 7. C.C.No.224/2015 SI of police App for Prosecution 19.10.2020 Served Tiruttani P.S and summons to Vs Mr.R.Sivaraj Lw6 to Lw9 Parthiban 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification Information Sheet Para-Cross Country Skiing
    Classification Information Sheet Para-Cross Country Skiing This information is intended to be a generic guide to classification for Para-Cross Country Skiing. The classification of athletes in this sport is performed by authorised classifiers according to the World Para Nordic Skiing classification rules. What is the classification process? Trained classifiers assess an athlete using the World Para Nordic Skiing classification rules to determine the following: 1. Does the athlete have an eligible impairment type? An athlete must have a permanent eligible impairment type and provide medical documentation detailing their diagnosis and health condition. 2. Does the athlete meet the minimum impairment criteria for the sport? Specific criteria applied to each sport to determine if a person’s impairment results in sufficient limitation in their sport. This is called the minimum impairment criteria. 3. What is the appropriate class to allocate the athlete for competition? Classes are detailed in the classification rules for the sport and a classifier determines the class an athlete will compete in. Which Paralympic impairment groups compete in Para-Cross Country Skiing? Athletes are required to have a permanent, eligible impairment and will be required to provide medical diagnostic information about their diagnosis and impairment. Eligible Impairment Type Examples of health conditions Vision Reduced or no vision in both eyes caused by damage to the eye structure, optical Impairment nerves/optic pathways, or visual cortex of the brain. Includes
    [Show full text]
  • IPC Alpine Skiing Classification Rules and Regulations
    IPC Alpine Skiing Classification Rules and Regulations 05 December 2012 International Paralympic Committee Adenauerallee 212-214 Tel.+49 228 2097-200 www.paralympic.org 53113 Bonn, Germany Fax+49 228 2097-209 [email protected] Content 1 INTRODUCTION TO CLASSIFICATION ..................................................................................................... 4 1.1 GOVERNANCE ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 STRUCTURE OF CLASSIFICATION REGULATIONS .................................................................................................................. 4 1.3 PURPOSE OF CLASSIFICATION REGULATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 IPC CLASSIFICATION CODE ........................................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................................................................. 5 2 CLASSIFIERS .......................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 CLASSIFICATION PERSONNEL ......................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 CLASSIFIERS – LEVELS
    [Show full text]
  • National Officials Program LEVEL 1 Alpine, Para Alpine, Ski Cross
    National Officials Program LEVEL 1 Alpine, Para Alpine, Ski Cross Updated: November 2015 FACILITATOR: ( Insert Name ) INTRODUCTION • Name: • Club: • Child’s Race Category: • Your involvement with Racing: – Racer – Official • Why are you taking this course? • Expectations of this course? OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVES • Hierarchy of Alpine Sanctioning Bodies • Canadian Officials Program • The Race Course • Race Organization • Race Officials & Their Functions • Timing • Gate Judging & Correct Passage • Course Crew & Safety set-up OVERVIEW • Sanctioning Bodies • Competitive Racing Levels • Officials’ Program OVERVIEW ALPINE INTERNATIONAL SKI FEDERATION • World governing body • Rules and Standards, sanctions, penalties • World Cup • World Championships • Continental Cups • Olympic Winter Games with/for IOC • www.fis-ski.com NSO – Alpine Canada Alpin • National Sports Organization - ACA • National governing body - Alpine, Para-alpine, Ski Cross • National Ski Teams • National Championships • Rules and Standards, sanctions, penalties (FIS compliant and ACA) • Leadership for sport development at national level (racing, coaching, officiating) • www.alpinecanada.org PTSO Provincial Territorial Sports Organizations: • Provincial governing body • Provincial Ski Teams • Provincial Championships • Rules and Standards, sanctions, penalties (FIS & ACA compliant and ‘local’) • Leadership for sport development at provincial level (racing, coaching, officiating) DIVISIONS / ZONES • Local governing body • Local Teams • Rules and Standards, sanctions, penalties (FIS, ACA and PSO compliant) • Leadership for sport development at local level (racing, coaching, officiating) RACING LEVELS • Non-Points Races . All age groups, calendared by divisions with PSO • Club specific ‘house-league’ and ‘fun-n-glory’ programs usually are not under PSO sanction • National Points Races . U14 and older, calendared at ACA by PSO . Competitive stream to qualify for provincial and national championships • FIS Races . U18 and older, calendared at FIS by ACA .
    [Show full text]
  • World Para Alpine Skiing WC Points Winter Season 2013/14
    World Para Alpine Skiing World Cup Overall Rankings Winter Season 2013/14 World Para Alpine Skiing WC Points Winter Season 2013/14 World Cup Overall Rankings created by IPC Sport Data Management System Period Start: 2013-07-01 | Period End: 2014-06-30 Women's VI Rank SDMS ID Name NPC Class WC Points Tie Break 1 13418 Umstead, Danelle USA B2 1200 2 13286 Frantseva, Aleksandra RUS B2 1140 3 12946 Perrine, Melissa AUS B2 905 4 13140 Gallagher, Kelly GBR B3 720 5 13139 Etherington, Jade GBR B2 705 6 13349 Farkasova, Henrieta SVK B3 680 7 2142 Gallagher, Jessica AUS B3 440 8 14237 Mannella, Staci USA B3 385 9 13350 Kozickova, Petra SVK B3 230 10 16125 Yang, Jae Rim KOR B2 60 11 13414 Sarubbi, Caitlin USA B3 40 Women's Standing Rank SDMS ID Name NPC Class WC Points Tie Break 1 13116 Bochet, Marie FRA LW6/8-2 1460 2 13162 Rothfuss, Andrea GER LW6/8-2 1220 3 13288 Medvedeva, Inga RUS LW2 1072 4 13408 Jones, Allison USA LW2 875 5 13291 Papulova, Mariia RUS LW6/8-2 727 6 13261 Jochemsen, Anna NED LW2 577 7 13351 Smarzova, Petra SVK LW6/8-2 476 8 13407 Jallen, Stephanie USA LW9-1 353 9 13086 Pueyo Marimon, Ursula ESP LW2 350 10 13035 Starker, Alexandra CAN LW6/8-2 310 11 13119 Jambaque, Solene FRA LW9-2 287 12 13034 Schwartz, Melanie USA LW2 240 13 13274 Valeanu, Laura ROU LW4 150 14 19058 Latimer, Erin CAN LW6/8-2 127 15 13206 Corradini, Melania ITA LW6/8-1 120 16 14412 Mills, Heather GBR LW4 80 17 13032 Ramsay, Alana CAN LW9-2 72 IPC Sport Data Management System Page 1 of 4 26 September 2021 at 22:37:42 CEST World Para Alpine Skiing World Cup Overall
    [Show full text]
  • Les Autres Paralympic Winter Games
    Les Autres Paralympic Winter Games Paralympic Alpine Skiing Sitting – Standing – Blind Skiers Marco Bernardi Paralympic Nordic Skiing Cross Country Skiing Sitting - Standing - Blind Skiers Marco Bernardi Paralympic Nordic Skiing Biathlon Sitting - Standing - Blind Skiers Marco Bernardi Classification for Nordic Skiing Standing Athletes LW2: Athletes with disabilities in one lower limb, skiing with two skis and two poles. Example: single above-knee amputation with prosthesis. LW3: Athletes with disabilities in both lower limbs, skiing with two skis and two poles. Example: double below-knee amputation. LW4: Athletes with disabilities in one lower limb, skiing with two skis and two poles. Example: single below-knee amputation. LW5/7: Athletes with disabilities in both upper limbs, skiing with two skis but without poles. The disability must be such that the use of poles is not possible. Example: double upper-limb amputations. LW6/8: Athletes with disabilities in one upper limb, skiing with two skis and one pole. The disability must be such that the functional use of more than one pole is not possible. Example: single upper-limb amputation. LW9: Athletes with disabilities in one upper limb and one lower limb, skiing with the equipment of their choice but using two skis. Sitting Athletes LW10: Athletes with disabilities in the lower limbs, no functional sitting balance. Athletes with cerebral palsy with disabilities in all four limbs (functional classification), skiing with a sit-ski of their choice. LW11: Athletes with disabilities in the lower limbs and a fair sitting balance. Athletes with cerebral palsy with disabilities in lower extremities, skiing with a sit-ski of their choice.
    [Show full text]
  • Explanatory Guide to Paralympic Classification Winter Sports
    EXPLANATORY GUIDE TO PARALYMPIC CLASSIFICATION PARALYMPIC WINTER SPORTS JULY 2020 INTERNATIONAL PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE 2 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this guide is to explain classification and classification systems of Para sports that are currently on the Paralympic Winter Games programme. The document is intended for anyone who wishes to familiarise themselves with classification in the Paralympic Movement. The language in this guide has been simplified in order to avoid complicated medical terms. They do not replace the 2015 IPC Athlete Classification Code and accompanying International Standards but have been written to better communicate how the Paralympic Classification system works. The guide consists of several chapters: 1. Explaining what classification is 2. Guiding through the eligible impairments recognised in the Paralympic Movement 3. Explaining classification systems; and 4. Explaining sport classes per sport on the Paralympic Winter Games programme: • Para alpine skiing • Para ice hockey • Para nordic skiing • Para snowboard • Wheelchair curling INTERNATIONAL PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE 3 WHAT IS CLASSIFICATION? Classification provides a structure for competition. Athletes competing in para- sports have an impairment that leads to a competitive disadvantage. Consequently, a system has been put in place to minimise the impact of impairments on sport performance and to ensure the success of an athlete is determined by skill, fitness, power, endurance, tactical ability and mental focus. The system is called classification. Classification determines who is eligible to compete in a Para sport and it groups the eligible athletes in sport classes according to their activity limitation in a certain sport. TEN ELIGIBLE IMPAIRMENTS The Paralympic Movement offers sport opportunities for athletes with physical, visual and/or intellectual impairments that have at least one of the 10 eligible impairments identified in the table below.
    [Show full text]
  • World Para Alpine Skiing WC Points Winter Season 2016/17
    World Para Alpine Skiing World Cup Overall Rankings Winter Season 2016/17 World Para Alpine Skiing WC Points Winter Season 2016/17 World Cup Overall Rankings created by IPC Sport Data Management System Period Start: 2016-07-01 | Period End: 2017-06-30 Women's VI Rank SDMS ID Name NPC Class WC Points Tie Break 1 13349 Farkasova, Henrieta SVK B3 2060 2 19084 Knight, Millie GBR B2 1260 3 13418 Umstead, Danelle USA B2 930 4 12946 Perrine, Melissa AUS B2 900 5 14237 Mannella, Staci USA B3 726 6 19135 Fitzpatrick, Menna GBR B2 580 7 24071 Sana, Eleonor BEL B2 545 8 13140 Gallagher, Kelly GBR B3 430 9 16125 Yang, Jae Rim KOR B2 240 10 23842 Ristau, Noemi Ewa GER B2 95 Women's Standing Rank SDMS ID Name NPC Class WC Points Tie Break 1 13162 Rothfuss, Andrea GER LW6/8-2 1660 2 13032 Ramsay, Alana CAN LW9-2 1435 3 13351 Smarzova, Petra SVK LW6/8-2 919 4 19058 Latimer, Erin CAN LW6/8-2 904 5 13261 Jochemsen, Anna NED LW2 871 6 13116 Bochet, Marie FRA LW6/8-2 700 7 13407 Jallen, Stephanie USA LW9-1 618 8 17261 Schmidt, Bigna SUI LW5/7-3 576 9 13034 Schwartz, Melanie USA LW2 534 10 13274 Valeanu, Laura ROU LW4 442 11 29162 Rieder, Anna-Maria GER LW9-1 350 12 13086 Pueyo Marimon, Ursula ESP LW2 320 13 13206 Corradini, Melania ITA LW6/8-1 233 14 26952 Pemble, Mel CAN LW9-2 201 15 27516 Kunkel, Ally USA LW6/8-2 100 16 31624 Hondo, Ammi JPN LW6/8-2 50 17 17095 Chatel-Laley, Marie FRA LW9-2 45 18 20240 Turgeon, Frederique CAN LW2 32 IPC Sport Data Management System Page 1 of 3 24 September 2021 at 20:58:39 CEST World Para Alpine Skiing World Cup Overall
    [Show full text]
  • World Para Alpine Skiing Classification Rules and Regulations August 2017 O Cial World Para Alpine Skiing Supplier
    World Para Alpine Skiing Classification Rules and Regulations August 2017 O cial World Para Alpine Skiing Supplier www.WorldParaAlpineSkiing.org @ParaAlpine ParalympicSport.TV /ParaAlpine World Para Alpine Skiing Classification Rules and Regulations August 2017 World Para Alpine Skiing Adenauerallee 212-214 Tel. +49 228 2097-200 53113 Bonn, Germany Fax +49 228 2097-209 www.WorldParaAlpineSkiing.org [email protected] Table of Content Table of Content ...................................................................................................................2 Part One: General Provisions.................................................................................................5 1 Scope and Application ...................................................................................................5 2 Roles and Responsibilities .............................................................................................7 Part Two: Classification Personnel ........................................................................................9 3 Classification Personnel ................................................................................................9 4 Classifier Competencies, Training and Certification ..................................................... 10 5 Classifier Code of Conduct .......................................................................................... 12 Part Three: Athlete Evaluation ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IPC Nordic Skiing Biathlon & Cross-Country Skiing Rules and Regulations
    IPC Nordic Skiing Biathlon & Cross-Country Skiing Rules and Regulations © All rights reserved: International Paralympic Committee, 2008 IPC Nordic Skiing Rules The IPC Nordic Skiing Rules apply to all IPC sanctioned events in Biathlon and Cross-Country Skiing. These rules have been determined and supported by the IPC Sport Forum for Nordic Skiing. The below rules will from now on be the only valid means of reference for this sport, overruling any previously published rules on IPC Nordic Skiing. This rulebook will remain in force until the publication of the next FIS (International Skiing federation)/IBU (International Biathlon Union) Rulebook, at which time a new edition can be published to take account of any new FIS/IBU rules coming into force at that time, and which affect IPC Nordic Skiing Rules. Table of Contents Page IPC Cross-Country Skiing Rules 1 IPC Biathlon Rules 40 IPC NORDIC SKIING Rules & Regulations 1 CROSS-COUNTRY SKIING Season 08/09 Table of Contents 1st Section 100 IPC Cross-Country Skiing Rules 2nd Section 100 IPC Nordic Skiing ......................................................................... 3 222 Competition Equipment ............................................................. 3 Cross-Country Competitions ............................................................................. 4 A. Organisation ....................................................................................................... 4 302 The Competition Officials ......................................................... 4 303 The Jury
    [Show full text]