DOCSLIB.ORG

King and Yolande Sustainability Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
King and Yolande Sustainability Review King and Yolande Sustainability Review Outcomes and Commitments Report - June 2021 King and Yolande Sustainability Review team Post: GPO Box 355, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia Email: [email protected] Call: 1300 360 441 (Local call cost Australia-wide) For further information on sustainability reviews and water management: www.hydro.com.au Contents 1.0 Introduction 4 1.1 Background 4 1.2 Hydro Tasmania’s Water Management Review Program 4 2.0 The King-Yolande Sustainability Review Stages 6 2.1 Stage 1 - Information Review 6 2.2 Stage 2 – Stakeholder Consultation 7 2.3 Stage 3 – Technical and Social Studies 7 2.4 Stage 4 – Outcomes and Commitments 7 3.0 Outcomes and Commitments 8 3.1 Community Engagement and Involvement 8 3.2 Recreational Access 9 3.3 Biodiversity 10 3.4 Water Quality 11 3.5 Weed Management 12 3.6 Aboriginal and Historic Heritage 13 4.0 Conclusion 14 5.0 Acknowledgements 15 6.0 For More Information 15 Hydro Tasmania King and Yolande Sustainability Review - Outcomes and Commitments Report - June 2021 3 1. Introduction he King and Yolande hydropower schemes (comprised of John Butters and Upper and Lower Lake Margaret power stations) provide a highly valued and reliable source of electricity. The total installed capacity of the hydropower schemes is 154.6 MW and the average annual generation is almost 600 gigawatt hours, which is 6.4 per cent of the total hydropower system in Tasmania. Construction of the King and Yolande hydropower schemes has resulted in the creation of Lake Burbury (King scheme) and Lake Margaret (Yolande scheme). These storages have resulted in alterations to the natural flow of downstream rivers and streams. This report documents the findings, outcomes and commitments of the Lake Margaret woodstave pipeline King-Yolande Sustainability Review. 1.1 Background 1.2 Hydro Tasmania’s Sustainability is a core value for Hydro Tasmania, Water Management underpinned by a commitment to create a sustainable Review Program future. Being sustainable involves the application of economic, environmental, social and governance Our Water Management Review program was initiated considerations to business decisions and activities. in 1999. It aims to review water and land management activities across the six major hydropower catchments We believe that these considerations will help drive in Tasmania. long-term business success and allow successive generations to enjoy the benefits of a clean energy future. Part of sustainable management is making sure that the Our Sustainability Code and Environmental Policy land and water resources we manage are available for all to are available on Hydro Tasmania’s website at use for years to come. As such, the review is undertaken www.hydro.com.au. in consultation with a broad range of stakeholders and considers impacts on environmental, social and economic Our commitment to support and collaborate with our conditions within the catchments. customers and the community is captured in Hydro Tasmania’s Recreation Principles. These principles Once a catchment has been assessed, a series of actions provide direction to facilitate recreation on our land are identified and evaluated to determine which ones and waterways for the benefit of all. would most improve management of the resource and deliver the greatest benefit most efficiently. We make commitments to the community about specific actions that lead to improved outcomes for environmental and social values in the catchment. 4 Hydro Tasmania King and Yolande Sustainability Review - Outcomes and Commitments Report - June 2021 Lake Margaret tramway In 2013 our approach to catchment reviews changed from ‘Water Management Review’ to ‘Sustainability Review’. This approach is intended to align Hydro Tasmania with the International Hydropower Association’s (IHA) Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol (HSAP) and the current known environmental and social status of the catchments as the basis for the sustainability review. The approach to identifying issues and opportunities provided by the protocol delivers consistency and clarity amongst hydropower projects world-wide. The IHA Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Gap Analysis Tool (www.hydrosustainability.org/esg-tool) was used during Stage 1 of the Sustainability Review, to assess Hydro Tasmania’s current sustainability practises in the King and Yolande catchments. Hydro Tasmania King and Yolande Sustainability Review - Outcomes and Commitments Report - June 2021 5 2.0 The King-Yolande Sustainability Review Stages The King - Yolande Sustainability Review is 2.1 Stage 1 - Information the fifth catchment review we’ve undertaken. The review is focussed on the King and Review Yolande catchments, which encompass four Stage 1 of the review commenced in 2019 and focused key waterways: Lake Burbury, the King River, on collecting, summarising, and publishing consolidated Lake Margaret and the Yolande River, on the information on operational, social and environmental west coast of Tasmania. The review is an (including water quality) aspects of the King and Yolande hydropower schemes. opportunity for us to assess our current land and water management, and, in consultation with The IHA’s ESG Gap Analysis Tool was used to assess stakeholders, identify areas where improvements the hydropower schemes to identify where there are to sustainable management practices can be opportunities for improvement and where the schemes are performing well in the social and environmental space. implemented. Stage 1 was completed in September 2019 and culminated The sustainability review was completed in four stages: in the public release of the Information Review summary 1. Information review report and a number of fact sheets, which can be found on our website. 2. Stakeholder consultation 3. Technical and social studies 4. Outcomes and commitments. This report summarises the sustainability review process, as well as the outcomes and commitments that we have made to improve the sustainability of our operations in the King and Yolande catchments. Upper Lake Margaret Power Station from above 6 Hydro Tasmania King and Yolande Sustainability Review - Outcomes and Commitments Report - June 2021 Community consultation 2.2 Stage 2 – Stakeholder 2.3 Stage 3 – Technical and Consultation Social Studies Community and stakeholder consultation was initiated We conducted three technical studies to investigate key via an information session for the general public in issues raised in Stages 1 and 2. These studies included: Queenstown in September 2019, followed by discussions with key stakeholders including the West Coast Council, • Lake Burbury short-tailed rain crayfish Ombrastacoides( the Inland Fisheries Service (IFS), and the Tasmanian parvicaudatus) survey Salmonid Growers Association. During these conversations, • Assessment of legacy metal loads entering Lake stakeholders and the general community were invited to Burbury via Linda and Idaho Creeks complete a consultation survey, which was also promoted on our website and social media pages, by the West Coast • Weeds survey and management. Community Services Hub, and on 7XS Queenstown radio. A summary of the context, aims, outcomes and The aim of the consultation survey was to gain a greater commitments for each study, together with other areas of understanding of community values and concerns relating investigation (including social), is provided in Section 3 of to the waterways within the King and Yolande catchments, this report. and areas where opportunities for improvement might exist (that would be possible under our operations). 2.4 Stage 4 – Outcomes and Direct stakeholder engagement was supported by more general engagement opportunities associated with Commitments our Community Program, local staff, school outreach Informed by an understanding of stakeholder issues programs, and participation in community-based and the outcomes from the technical studies and social committees. investigations, commitments to improve the management Stage 2 was completed in February 2020 and a summary of environmental, social, and cultural heritage values and of the outcomes can be found on our website. issues have been identified in Section 3 of this report. Hydro Tasmania King and Yolande Sustainability Review - Outcomes and Commitments Report - June 2021 7 3.0 Outcomes and Commitments We have been actively working to address Outcomes: issues raised and a number of outcomes have • Maintained engagement and involvement with been achieved. We remain committed to catchment communities (Queenstown and strengthening our community involvement in Gormanston) through activities such as our Community the King-Yolande region. The key contexts, Grants process, local community events and initiatives aims, outcomes and commitments are such as The Unconformity, power station open days, summarised below under the main themes of resident employees and our education outreach program. the review including: community engagement and involvement, recreational access, • Community feedback directly influenced the biodiversity, water quality, weed management identification of priority investigations undertaken and Aboriginal and historic heritage. in Stage 3 of the review. This included the weed management study (see section 3.5) and investigation into collaborative opportunities at the Harris Reward Trail with Sustainable Timbers Tasmania (STT), Mineral Resources Tasmania (MRT) and RoamWild 3.1 Community Engagement (see section 3.2). and Involvement • We have an agreement with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • No Ordinary Place. No Ordinary Festival
    Queenstown, Tasmania | 14–16 October 2016 | theunconformity.com.au No ordinary place. No ordinary festival. 1 WELCOME TO QUEENSTOWN and Tasmania’s West IN 2016, The Unconformity will once again Coast for The Unconformity. This festival is really like no bring an exciting program of contemporary arts other, one that must be experienced to be believed. experiences to Queenstown and surrounds. These arts experiences are as varied and An unconformity is an area of rock that shows a geological unique as the voices they represent with works break in time. The Unconformity Festival bridges every by local, national and international artists. layer of the West Coast and, like its geological namesake, indicates a break in the region’s past and present. It brings The value the Festival brings to the Queenstown the community together to celebrate Queenstown’s rugged community is significant. It encourages backbone, unique arts culture and unmatched sense of place. community members to come together and participate in the arts and the calibre of its This year’s festival program showcases local, interstate program attracts more visitors to the region and overseas artists to present a weekend for everyone each biennial year. The Unconformity compels to enjoy. It is as dramatic as the surrounding landscape. visitors to engage with and explore the unique The Tasmanian Government is proud to support The region that is Tasmania’s remote West Coast, Unconformity in 2016. Congratulations to the team behind drawing them back again and again. the festival who, along with the Queenstown community, Over the past six years, the festival bring this extraordinary mix of arts and heritage together has flourished and grown and is now a for all of us to embrace.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaspersic Contracting Pty Ltd, Rock Processing Facility, Lynchford
    Rock Processing Facility – Lynchford Environment Effects Report Prepared by: Barry Williams Date: 24 March 2020 Issue Date Recipient Organisation Revision 0 11 March 2020 Mr Joe Gaspersic Gaspersic Contracting Pty Ltd Revision 1 16 March 2020 Environment Protection Authority Revision 2 24 March 2020 Environment Protection Authority Lynchford rock processing – EER Revision 2 This Report is based entirely on information available to ILMP at the time of its creation. ILMP accepts no liability for any loss or damage, whether direct or indirect, in the event that not all relevant information that the Principal knows or should have known is provided to ILMP prior to the implementation of this Report. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................... 2 Tables ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 Part A - Proponent information .............................................................................................................. 4 Part B – Proposal description .................................................................................................................. 5 1 Overview of activity and site ........................................................................................................... 5 2 Site layout and development .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hydro 4 Water Storage
    TERM OF REFERENCE 3: STATE-WIDE WATER STORAGE MANAGEMENT The causes of the floods which were active in Tasmania over the period 4-7 June 2016 including cloud-seeding, State-wide water storage management and debris management. 1 CONTEXT 1.1 Cause of the Floods (a) It is clear that the flooding that affected northern Tasmania (including the Mersey, Forth, Ouse and South Esk rivers) during the relevant period was directly caused by “a persistent and very moist north-easterly airstream” which resulted in “daily [rainfall] totals [that were] unprecedented for any month across several locations in the northern half of Tasmania”, in some cases in excess of 200mm.1 (b) This paper addresses Hydro Tasmania’s water storage management prior to and during the floods. 1.2 Overview (a) In 2014, Tasmania celebrated 100 years of hydro industrialisation and the role it played in the development of Tasmania. Hydro Tasmania believes that understanding the design and purpose of the hydropower infrastructure that was developed to bring electricity and investment to the state is an important starting point to provide context for our submission. The Tasmanian hydropower system design and operation is highly complex and is generally not well understood in the community. We understand that key stakeholder groups are seeking to better understand the role that hydropower operations may have in controlling or contributing to flood events in Tasmania. (b) The hydropower infrastructure in Tasmania was designed and installed for the primary purpose of generating hydro-electricity. Flood mitigation was not a primary objective in the design of Hydro Tasmania’s dams when the schemes were developed, and any flood mitigation benefit is a by-product of their hydro- generation operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Margaret Power Scheme a Conservation Management Plan
    Lake Margaret Power Scheme A Conservation Management Plan Volume 1 March 2006 Paul Davies Pty Ltd Architects Heritage Consultants Lake Margaret Power Scheme Paul Davies Pty Ltd Conservation Management Plan March 2006 Lake Margaret Power Scheme Paul Davies Pty Ltd Conservation Management Plan March 2006 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 How to Use the Plan....................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Limitations ...................................................................................... 2 1.1.3 Authors ........................................................................................... 2 1.1.4 Acknowledgments .......................................................................... 2 1.1.5 Identification of the Place ............................................................... 3 2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND........................................................................... 6 2.1 Preface....................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Summary History........................................................................................ 6 2.3 Major Stages of Development of the site ................................................... 7 2.4 Development of the Power Station Building............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Commitments Factsheet
    King and Yolande Sustainability Review Outcomes and commitments Water quality and river health Sustainability reviews provide Hydro These sites were monitored in September and November Tasmania with the opportunity to evaluate 2019, and January 2020. March and May sampling did not go ahead due to impacts of COVID-19. the impacts of our hydropower operations in the catchments we operate in. Based on the Measurements of nutrients, metals and aspects necessary to information review and community support aquatic life such as dissolved oxygen, were taken at the surface and various depths to collect information on consultation we undertook baseline water quality across the lakes. monitoring on water quality and river health, and a specific study on metal loads to Lake Burbury. The outcomes and commitments regarding water quality and river health within the King and Yolande catchments are presented below. Water quality Water quality was rated as the second highest concern in the community consultation survey. Two respondents commented on pollution in the King River from mine Water quality management: Lake Burbury (source: discharge to the Queen River. Concerns regarding legacy M.Wapstra) (historic) mine discharge via Linda Creek to Lake Burbury Outcome were also raised in the information review. Water quality at both lakes Burbury and Margaret has Water quality and river health information is important to remained consistent over time. Recent data fit within historic collect for the lakes and rivers we manage. This information ranges and expectations for both sites. allows us to measure any substantial change in water quality over time and better understand our waterways.
    [Show full text]
  • 3966 Tour Op 4Col
    The Tasmanian Advantage natural and cultural features of Tasmania a resource manual aimed at developing knowledge and interpretive skills specific to Tasmania Contents 1 INTRODUCTION The aim of the manual Notesheets & how to use them Interpretation tips & useful references Minimal impact tourism 2 TASMANIA IN BRIEF Location Size Climate Population National parks Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area (WHA) Marine reserves Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) 4 INTERPRETATION AND TIPS Background What is interpretation? What is the aim of your operation? Principles of interpretation Planning to interpret Conducting your tour Research your content Manage the potential risks Evaluate your tour Commercial operators information 5 NATURAL ADVANTAGE Antarctic connection Geodiversity Marine environment Plant communities Threatened fauna species Mammals Birds Reptiles Freshwater fishes Invertebrates Fire Threats 6 HERITAGE Tasmanian Aboriginal heritage European history Convicts Whaling Pining Mining Coastal fishing Inland fishing History of the parks service History of forestry History of hydro electric power Gordon below Franklin dam controversy 6 WHAT AND WHERE: EAST & NORTHEAST National parks Reserved areas Great short walks Tasmanian trail Snippets of history What’s in a name? 7 WHAT AND WHERE: SOUTH & CENTRAL PLATEAU 8 WHAT AND WHERE: WEST & NORTHWEST 9 REFERENCES Useful references List of notesheets 10 NOTESHEETS: FAUNA Wildlife, Living with wildlife, Caring for nature, Threatened species, Threats 11 NOTESHEETS: PARKS & PLACES Parks & places,
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Margaret Feasibility Study Volume 1: Main Report
    LAKE MARGARET FEASIBILITY STUDY VOLUME 1: MAIN REPORT Prepared by: HYDRO ELECTRIC CORPORATION ARBN 072 377 158 ABN 48 072 377 158 4 Elizabeth Street, Hobart Tasmania, Australia Lake Margaret Feasibility Study This page left intentionally blank Hydro Tasmania Page ii Lake Margaret Feasibility Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction and background The Lake Margaret Power Scheme, which began producing electricity in 1914, is one of the oldest hydropower schemes in Australia and is an area of outstanding heritage significance. It is an example of the pioneering period of hydro-electric development in Australia. Due principally to its private ownership and continuous operation for most of its life, the site has retained nearly all of its early infrastructure and equipment. The scheme consists of the following major assets: • Lake Margaret Dam (post tensioned concrete gravity dam). • King Billy pine woodstave pipeline, transporting water from the dam to the penstock. • Penstock. • Upper power station. • Lower power station, (decommissioned in 1994). • Lake Margaret Village, including seven cottages and a community hall. The site has been provisionally listed on the Tasmanian Heritage Register (THR) and is currently being assessed for National Heritage Listing. The provisional listing on the THR holds the same legislative requirement as a full listing, which means any redevelopment would require approval from the Tasmanian Heritage Council. Hydro Tasmania took over ownership of the scheme in 1985 from the Mt Lyell Mining and Railway Company and, until its closure in June 2006, the scheme produced approximately 0.5% of Tasmania’s total electricity output. The aging power station was closed on 30 June 2006, primarily due to safety concerns regarding the woodstave hilltop pipeline, which had been assessed as being at end of life and at risk of failure.
    [Show full text]
  • West Coast Wilderness
    WEst COast WILDERNESS WAY This route links the three World Heritage START: Cradle Mountain EXPLORE: Tasmania’s West Coast Areas of Cradle Mountain, the wild rivers of DURATION: 3-4 days the Franklin and lower Gordon River and NATIONAL PARKS ON THIS ROUTE: the land and 3,000 lakes that surround > Franklin-Gordon Wild Rivers National Park Lake St Clair. The route starts from Cradle Mountain and explores the unique post- settlement history of the region that includes convicts, miners and railway men and their families. LEG TIME / DISTANCE Cradle Mountain to Zeehan 1 hr 35 min / 106 km Zeehan to Strahan 41 min / 44 km Strahan to Queenstown 37 min / 41 km Queenstown to Lake St Clair (Derwent Bridge) 1 hr / 86 km Cradle Mountain - Zeehan > After enjoying the Cradle Mountain experience make your next stop Tullah, a town with a chequered history of mining and hydro development that now caters to visitors. > Stop for refreshments at Tullah Lakeside Lodge or maybe a bit of fishing on Lake Rosebery. > The town of Rosebery, a short drive farther southwest, is a working mine township proud of its environmental management. Tour the mine’s surface infrastructure. > Nearby is a three-hour return walk to Tasmania’s tallest waterfall, Montezuma Falls. > Continue on to Zeehan, once Tasmania’s third-largest town with gold and silver mines, numerous hotels and more than 10,000 residents. Now it’s at the centre of the west coast’s mining heritage, with the West Coast Heritage Centre, the unusual Spray Tunnel and the Grand Hotel and Gaiety Theatre.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Burbury Spotted Galaxias (Galaxias Truttaceus) Are Found in the Catchment and Are Probably Present in Low Numbers at Lake Burbury
    EDITION 4 Native Fish Management The climbing galaxias (Galaxias brevipinnis) and the Lake Burbury spotted galaxias (Galaxias truttaceus) are found in the catchment and are probably present in low numbers at Lake Burbury. Anglers Pest Fish Management It is an offence to use fish or fish products for bait or to Access transfer fish between waters. REGION: WEST Recreational Use A good concrete boat ramp is located at Thureau Hills (West of Bradshaws Bridge). A formal camping and caravan park and boat ramp are located on the eastern side of the bridge and boat launching and informal camping is available near the Darwin Dam at the southern end of the lake. Anglers are encouraged to bring portable toilets or be sure to walk at least 100 metres from the water, dig a 15-centimetre hole and bury waste including the toilet paper. Access Rules • Keep to formed tracks. • Do not litter. • Respect Hydro land. • Shooting is prohibited. • Fires in formal fireplaces or firepots only. • Do not fell trees. CONTACT DETAILS 17 Back River Road, New Norfolk, 7140 Ph: 1300 INFISH www.ifs.tas.gov.au Mick Emmett BL11345 Inland Fisheries Service Getting There lane abundant with surface feeding rainbow and brown Protect our Waters trout. Small wet or dry flies placed in front of these fish Travel to Queenstown via the A10. The A10 crosses the can often produce results. When the fish are proving Recreational anglers have a responsibility to look after centre of Lake Burbury where access to the northern difficult a large dry fly pattern such as a royal coachman fisheries resources for the benefit of the environment camping and launching areas are sign posted.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Tasmanian Inland Recreational Fishery Management Plan 2018-28
    DRAFT Tasmanian Inland Recreational Fishery Management Plan 2018-28 DRAFT Tasmanian Inland Recreational Fishery Management Plan 2018-28 Minister’s message It is my pleasure to release the Draft Tasmanian Inland Recreational Fishery Management Plan 2018-28 as the guiding document for the Inland Fisheries Service in managing this valuable resource on behalf of all Tasmanians for the next 10 years. The plan creates opportunities for anglers, improves access, ensures sustainability and encourages participation. Tasmania’s tradition with trout fishing spans over 150 years. It is enjoyed by local and visiting anglers in the beautiful surrounds of our State. Recreational fishing is a pastime and an industry; it supports regional economies providing jobs in associated businesses and tourism enterprises. A sustainable trout fishery ensures ongoing benefits to anglers and the community as a whole. To achieve sustainable fisheries we need careful management of our trout stocks, the natural values that support them and measures to protect them from diseases and pest fish. This plan simplifies regulations where possible by grouping fisheries whilst maintaining trout stocks for the future. Engagement and agreements with land owners and water managers will increase access and opportunities for anglers. The Tasmanian fishery caters for anglers of all skill levels and fishing interests. This plan helps build a fishery that provides for the diversity of anglers and the reasons they choose to fish. Jeremy Rockliff, Minister for Primary Industries and Water at the Inland Fisheries Service Trout Weekend 2017 (Photo: Brad Harris) DRAFT Tasmanian Inland Recreational Fishery Management Plan 2018-2028 FINAL.docx Page 2 of 27 DRAFT Tasmanian Inland Recreational Fishery Management Plan 2018-28 Contents Minister’s message ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Field Investigations Mt Darwin–Mt Murchison Region
    Mineral Resources Tasmania Tasmanian Geological Survey Tasmania DEPARTMENT of Record 2002/18 INFRASTRUCTURE, ENERGYand RESOURCES Western Tasmanian Regional Minerals Program Mount Read Volcanics Compilation Report on field investigations Mt Darwin–Mt Murchison Region K. C. Morrison CONTENTS SUMMARY ……………………………………………………………………… 2 INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………… 3 SCOPE OF THE PROJECT ………………………………………………………… 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ………………………………………………………… 3 FIELD TRAVERSES ……………………………………………………………… 4 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS ……………………………………………… 6 The Tyndall Group–Eastern Quartz-Phyric Sequence problem …………………… 6 Granite and related intrusive rocks — Exploration implications …………………… 7 Exploration potential of the region ……………………………………………… 9 REFERENCES …………………………………………………………………… 12 APPENDIX 1: Rock analyses ……………………………………………………… 14 FIGURES 1. Location of traverses …………………………………………………………… 16 2. Schematic cross section showing Cu-Au exploration potential of the Jukes–Darwin area, southern Mount Read Volcanics ……………………………… 10 While every care has been taken in the preparation of this report, no warranty is given as to the correctness of the information and no liability is accepted for any statement or opinion or for any error or omission. No reader should act or fail to act on the basis of any material contained herein. Readers should consult professional advisers. As a result the Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania and its employees, contractors and agents expressly disclaim all and any liability (including all liability from or attributable
    [Show full text]
  • Walking Track List - PWS Class Wl to T4
    PWS Commercial Visitor Services - Walking Track List - PWS class Wl to T4 Track Name FieldCentre PWS class AS2156 Length - Kms and Days PWS Management Region: Southern PWS Track Class: VV1 Overview: Wheelchair Standard Nature Trail Hastings Platypus Track Huonville W1 Class 1 0.290 less than 2 hrs Hastings Pool access track Huonville W1 Class 1 0.077 less than 2 hrs Mount Nelson Signal Station Tracks Derwent W1 Class 1 0.059 less than 2 hrs Russell Falls Nature Walk Mount Field W1 Class 1 0.649 less than 2 hrs PWS Management Region: Southern PWS Track Class: W2 Overview: Standard Nature Trail Arve Falls Huonville W2 Class 2 0.614 less than 2 hrs Blowhole circuit Tasman W2 Class 2 0.248 less than 2 hrs Cape Bruny lighthouse Bruny Island W2 Class 2 0.252 less than 2 hrs Cape Deslacs Seven Mile Beach W2 Class 2 0.154 less than 2 hrs Cape Deslacs Beach Seven Mile Beach W2 Class 2 0.345 less than 2 hrs Coal Point Bruny Island W2 Class 2 0.124 less than 2 hrs Creepy Crawly NT Mount Field W2 Class 2 0.175 less than 2 hrs Crowther Point Track Huonville W2 Class 2 0.248 less than 2 hrs Garden Point to Carnarvon Bay Tasman W2 Class 2 3.138 less than 2 hrs Gordons Hill fitness track Seven Mile Beach W2 Class 2 1.331 less than 2 hrs Hot Springs NT Huonville W2 Class 2 0.839 less than 2 hrs Kingston Heights Derwent W2 Class 2 0.344 less than 2 hrs Lake Osbome Huonville W2 Class 2 1.042 less than 2 hrs Maingon Bay lookout Tasman W2 Class 2 0.044 less than 2 hrs Needwonnee Walk Huonville W2 Class 2 1.324 less than 2 hrs Newdegate Cave - Main access
    [Show full text]