Ozploitation Revisited: Not Quite Hollywood

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ozploitation Revisited: Not Quite Hollywood ▐ ‘For every Caddie there was a Felicity. For every Picnic at Hanging Rock there was a Stunt Rock. For every Jimmie 1 Blacksmith there was an Alvin Purple.’ ▐ MARK HARTLEY Ozploitation Revisited Not Quite Hollywood direct opposition to mainstream Australian film culture. As he observes: ‘For every Mark Hartley’s new film straddles unpretentious Caddie there was a Felicity. For every Picnic at Hanging Rock there was a Stunt glee and obsessive research, writes Alexandra Rock. For every Jimmie Blacksmith there Heller-Nicholas. was an Alvin Purple.’1 Not Quite Hollywood launches with Rose Tattoo’s euphoric bogan anthem ‘We HE main intent of Mark Hartley’s Ozploitation renaissance that this docu- Can’t Be Beaten’, a track that in both lyric documentary on Australian com- mentary will no doubt trigger both here and and mood emphasizes the raucous (if Tmercial genre cinema of the 1970s abroad – is Quentin Tarantino. The Ameri- somewhat delusional) self-aggrandizing and 1980s – or, more affectionately, can cult film icon leaves little room in Not spirit that permeates many of the films Ozploitation film – is to highlight trash as Quite Hollywood for even his most vocal the documentary examines. In fact, it is an integral building block of the Australian critics to question his encyclopedic knowl- this precise tone that also governs many film industry as we know it today. edge of Australian commercial genre film of the most engaging interviews: from the of this era – a deliberate incitement to the outset, a spectacularly grumpy Bob Ellis Film scholars in Australia have very little cultural elite in this country that Tarantino clashes horns with an equally deadpan experience observing the mechanics of refers to as ‘snobs’. At the 2003 Austral- Phillip Adams and Barry Humphries as the legitimization of local cinematic trash, ian premiere of Kill Bill: Vol 1 in Sydney, they thrash out a historical framework watching it turn from fool’s gold into a rich Tarantino famously dedicated the screening upon which Hartley elegantly builds his mine of valuable cultural artefacts. While to Brian Trenchard-Smith, to the shock of a narrative. Segueing neatly from what we can view with detached fascination the few but to the bewilderment of most. Adams calls the ‘great cinematic silence of myriad instances of this occurring in for- Australian cinema’ of the 1960s, through eign contexts, Not Quite Hollywood (2008) Along with a cache of other key players, to the fascination with Australia of foreign challenges local audiences – critics and Trenchard-Smith is a central figure in Not directors such as Nicolas Roeg and Ted punters alike – to direct the mirror inwards. Quite Hollywood, and demonstrates in Kotcheff, the popularity of comedies such The result is that films that have been suc- person all the boisterous charm of his as Stork (Tim Burstall, 1971), Alvin Purple cessfully deleted from the filmic landscape films. This documentary unapologetically (Tim Burstall, 1973) and the Barry McKen- are now playing at such credible cultural aims to rescue Trenchard-Smith – and zie films (Bruce Beresford, 1972 and 1974) events as the Melbourne International Film Richard Franklin, Antony I. Ginnane, John is praised as laying the foundations for Festival (MIFF). Lamond and Terry Bourke, to name a this new mode of Australian cinema. few – from their contemporary obscurity, The informal patron of the film – and of the and Hartley actively positions their films in Encompassing both the Ocker comedies 14 • Metro Magazine 158 3 2 4 IDE FILMS W ITY C 2008 5 © 6 PHOTOS PHOTOS and sex comedies in this introductory section, Not Quite Hollywood succinctly 1: BARRY HUMPHRIES WITH DIRECTOR MARK and economically ticks the significant HARTLEY 2: THE ADVENTURES OF BARRY textual boxes: Felicity (John D. Lamond, MCKENZIE 3: MAD DOG MORGAN 4: DIRECTOR 1979), The Naked Bunyip (John B. Murray, JOHN LAMOND AND ACTRESS GLORY ANNEN 5: STORK 6: DEAD END DRIVE-IN 7: DEAD KIDS 1970), Petersen (Tim Burstall, 1974) and Eliza Fraser (Tim Burstall, 1976) are all landmarks in establishing the textual car- is here that Hartley’s hardcore insight into tography of Australian genre film from this softcore trash becomes apparent. Hartley era. The bulk of the documentary is then 7 is, in street parlance, bona fide: this is no divided neatly into two sections: horror poseur ego trip by any stretch. In fact, and action cinema. Aside from Hartley’s one of the most simple but overwhelming admirable grasp of the material in ques- selves and the motley cast of characters pleasures on offer in Not Quite Hollywood tion, it is the simple structure of the film responsible (and, in many cases, irrespon- is the chance to see – even if just in short that so effectively demonstrates both his sible) for their production. clip form – snippets of texts rarely (if ever) main claims regarding the unjust orthodox seen outside of late-night 1990s television refusal to acknowledge the influence and The conceptual logic of the ‘body genre’ or $1 ex-rental VHS cassettes, blurred, impact of Ozploitation film, and the charm rubric allows the Ocker comedies and sex chewed and almost unwatchable. Hartley and power inherent in both the films them- comedies to fluidly segue into horror, and it tips his hat enthusiastically towards Metro Magazine 158 • 15 1 ▐ Hartley tips his hat enthusiastically towards the ‘big name’ horror films, but the real treat is the humble, ‘no big deal’ manner in which almost-vanished films are treated to equal curatorial insight. ▐ his finest film. The refusal of Patrick to lose its charm despite (or perhaps because of) its self-conscious campiness is almost as 2 supernatural as the telekinesis bestowed upon its title character. The sadly underappreciated Robert Thompson (who ap- peared in Thirst [Rod Hardy, 1979] and a few episodes of Prisoner) is unrelenting in his determination to pump up the intensity of Patrick, despite his muteness throughout the film. Patrick was a huge success in the United States and Italy, the latter spawning the unau- 4 3 thorized sequel Patrick vive ancora (Mario Landi, 1980) (1981) is another cinematic treat: while a which, despite the slagging- 1: TURKEY SHOOT 2: STUNTMAN GRANT PAGE 3: RAZORBACK 4: GRANT PAGE AND JIMMY WANG qualitative ocean away from Next of Kin, off it receives in Not Quite Hollywood, is YU IN STUNT ROCK 5: ANTONY I. GINNANE it is equally innovative, captivating and an example of the bizarre lengths to which (like the bulk of Terry Bourke’s oeuvre) Italian genre film was pushed in the 1970s. deceptively haunting, despite its mediocre the ‘big name’ horror films – Razorback production qualities. Long Weekend (Colin Eggleston, 1978) is (Russell Mulcahy, 1984), Roadgames given pride of place in the horror section; (Richard Franklin, 1981), Patrick (Richard Following a brief overview of Bourke’s Tarantino in particular waxes lyrical about Franklin, 1978) – but the real treat is the chequered contribution to Australian the horror that stems from the relatively humble, ‘no big deal’ manner in which horror, Richard Franklin’s first feature film, simple storyline and the taut screenplay by almost-vanished films are treated to equal Patrick, is placed under the microscope. Everett De Roche (who also wrote Patrick). curatorial insight. Most notable of these Hartley movingly dedicates Not Quite Thirst, The Survivor (David Hemmings, is the haunting Next of Kin (Tony Williams, Hollywood to Franklin, who tragically died 1981) and Harlequin (Simon Wincer, 1980) 1982), compared by Tarantino to Stanley from prostate cancer just three weeks af- are included (again, three films that have Kubrick’s The Shining (1980) but just as ter being interviewed for this documentary. aged remarkably well, despite the latter’s easily (and flatteringly) described as an While Franklin is clearly unwell, his poor insistence on placing Robert Powell in Australian The Changeling (Peter Medak, health cannot obscure the kick he gets out snug-fitting spandex), and Russell Mulc- 1980). Terry Bourke’s Lady Stay Dead of talking about what many would argue is ahy’s self-flagellation over Razorback is 16 • Metro Magazine 158 balanced out by Tarantino’s somewhat much Australian commercial genre film relevance to contemporary Australian film backhanded compliment that Mulcahy is is directly associated with 10BA, but the culture, the hasty and far-too-tidy manner in ‘a poor man’s Ridley Scott’. film also spends much time exploring the which films like Wolf Creek (Greg McLean, significance of non-Australian person- 2005) and Undead (Spierig Brothers, 2003) Hartley also enthusiastically embraces the nel being imported to the national scene. are declared as the Next Wave with very action segment. Swiftly edited interviews Stacy Keach and Jamie Lee Curtis are little explanation seems to expose the clum- with a variety of key players hilariously both interviewed extensively in relation siness of the premise. Paradoxically, the outline the outrageous production histo- to the production of Richard Franklin’s documentary until this point goes to great ries of Stone (Sandy Harbutt, 1974) and Roadgames, and discuss, together with lengths to demonstrate that film history is Turkey Shoot (Brian Trenchard-Smith, Australian interviewees, the cultural and far from simple, and the abruptly simplistic 1982) in particular, and – as the director of industrial response to imported American conclusion appears to contradict such a the latter – Trenchard-Smith is positioned talent being utilized in a supposedly ‘Aus- view. Indicative of this awkward concession as a vital personality in the documentary tralian’ film. The question of national iden- to market relevance is the inclusion of the and seated next to Tarantino in a few tity is expanded even further in Hartley’s banal observations of the Saw (2004) snake pivotal interview scenes. Trenchard- oil merchants, Leigh Whannell and James Smith’s The Man from Hong Kong (1975) Wan, who – in comparison to auslander and Dead End Drive-In (1986), Mad Dog Tarantino – demonstrate that Australian Morgan (Philippe Mora, 1976) and George origins do not make one an expert on Aus- Miller’s Mad Max (1979) are discussed at tralian film.
Recommended publications
  • A Dark New World : Anatomy of Australian Horror Films
    A dark new world: Anatomy of Australian horror films Mark David Ryan Faculty of Creative Industries, Queensland University of Technology A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the degree Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), December 2008 The Films (from top left to right): Undead (2003); Cut (2000); Wolf Creek (2005); Rogue (2007); Storm Warning (2006); Black Water (2007); Demons Among Us (2006); Gabriel (2007); Feed (2005). ii KEY WORDS Australian horror films; horror films; horror genre; movie genres; globalisation of film production; internationalisation; Australian film industry; independent film; fan culture iii ABSTRACT After experimental beginnings in the 1970s, a commercial push in the 1980s, and an underground existence in the 1990s, from 2000 to 2007 contemporary Australian horror production has experienced a period of strong growth and relative commercial success unequalled throughout the past three decades of Australian film history. This study explores the rise of contemporary Australian horror production: emerging production and distribution models; the films produced; and the industrial, market and technological forces driving production. Australian horror production is a vibrant production sector comprising mainstream and underground spheres of production. Mainstream horror production is an independent, internationally oriented production sector on the margins of the Australian film industry producing titles such as Wolf Creek (2005) and Rogue (2007), while underground production is a fan-based, indie filmmaking subculture, producing credit-card films such as I know How Many Runs You Scored Last Summer (2006) and The Killbillies (2002). Overlap between these spheres of production, results in ‘high-end indie’ films such as Undead (2003) and Gabriel (2007) emerging from the underground but crossing over into the mainstream.
    [Show full text]
  • LAUREN BLISS the Cinematic Body in View of the Antipodes: Philip Brophy's Body Melt As the Bad Copy
    Lauren Bliss, The Cinematic Body in View of the Antipodes: Philip Brophy’s Body Melt as the bad copy LAUREN BLISS The Cinematic Body in View of the Antipodes: Philip Brophy’s Body Melt as the bad copy ABSTRACT Through a wide ranging study of Philip Brophy's academic and critical writings on horror cinema, this essay considers how Brophy's theory of the spectator's body is figured in his only horror feature Body Melt (1993). Body Melt is noteworthy insofar as it poorly copies a number of infamous sequences from classical horror films of the 1970s and 1980s, a form of figuration that this essay will theorise as distinctly Antipodean. Body Melt will be related as an antagonistic 'turning inside out' of the subjectivity of the horror movie spectator, which will be read in the light of both the usurped subject of semiotic film theory, and the political aesthetics of Australian exploitation cinema. Philip Brophy’s Body Melt, made in 1993, is a distinctly antipodean film: it not only copies scenes from classic horror movies such as The Hills Have Eyes (1977), Alien (1979), The Thing (1982) and Scanners (1981), it also copies the scenes badly. Such copying plays on and illuminates the ‘rules’ of horror as the toying with and preying upon the spectator’s expectation of fear. Brophy’s own theory of horror, written across a series of essays in academic and critical contexts between the 1980s and the 1990s, considers the peculiarity of the spectator’s body in the wake of the horror film. It relates that the seemingly autonomic or involuntary response of fear or suspense that horror movies induce in a viewer is troubled by the fact that both film and viewer knowingly intend this response to occur from the very beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSOLUTELY Press Kit Aug 25
    1 ABSOLUTELY MODERN A NEW Film BY PHILIPPE MORA “Modern paintings are like women, you'll never enjoy them if you try to understand them.” Freddie Mercury PRESS KIT Inquiries: morafilms@ gmail.com https://www.facebook.com/pages/Absolutely- Modern/429822753746917 2 ABSOLUTELY MODERN is "Absolutely funny, fresh and thought- provoking. Philippe Mora at his best." Piotr Czerkawski, Film Critic Wroclaw “..there is a genuine heart and soul to the film that is something of a passion project for Mora.” Laurence Boyce Screen Daily “The creation here (of Lord Steinway) is definitely a masterpiece.” Anna Tatarska FRED Radio, The Festival Insider “Mora’s films break all conventions, combine different styles and are nearly always saturated with rebellious, surrealistic humor.” Adam Kruk Film Critic, New Horizons “Mora tells perhaps one of his most personal stories to date as he examines art and modernism. Mora, who casual fans would most likely know from such films as Communion and cult classic The Return of Captain Invincible, unsurprisingly does not tell the tale with any regard for the norms of convention..” Screen International “Philippe Mora…French Australian director legend.” Der Spiegel May 2013 3 SYNOPSIS OF THE FILM This story of Modernism, muses and the role of sexuality in art are told by famed art critic Lord Steinway. When a soccer player, confronts Steinway as his son, the story takes a modernist twist itself. This comedy hit at the 2013 New Horizons International Film Festival takes the form of a hybrid of fact and fiction about Lord Steinway, the “Method” art critic, making his television show THE EPIC OF CIVILIZATION.
    [Show full text]
  • David Stratton's Stories of Australian Cinema
    David Stratton’s Stories of Australian Cinema With thanks to the extraordinary filmmakers and actors who make these films possible. Presenter DAVID STRATTON Writer & Director SALLY AITKEN Producers JO-ANNE McGOWAN JENNIFER PEEDOM Executive Producer MANDY CHANG Director of Photography KEVIN SCOTT Editors ADRIAN ROSTIROLLA MARK MIDDIS KARIN STEININGER HILARY BALMOND Sound Design LIAM EGAN Composer CAITLIN YEO Line Producer JODI MADDOCKS Head of Arts MANDY CHANG Series Producer CLAUDE GONZALES Development Research & Writing ALEX BARRY Legals STEPHEN BOYLE SOPHIE GODDARD SC SALLY McCAUSLAND Production Manager JODIE PASSMORE Production Co-ordinator KATIE AMOS Researchers RACHEL ROBINSON CAMERON MANION Interview & Post Transcripts JESSICA IMMER Sound Recordists DAN MIAU LEO SULLIVAN DANE CODY NICK BATTERHAM Additional Photography JUDD OVERTON JUSTINE KERRIGAN STEPHEN STANDEN ASHLEIGH CARTER ROBB SHAW-VELZEN Drone Operators NICK ROBINSON JONATHAN HARDING Camera Assistants GERARD MAHER ROB TENCH MARK COLLINS DREW ENGLISH JOSHUA DANG SIMON WILLIAMS NICHOLAS EVERETT ANTHONY RILOCAPRO LUKE WHITMORE Hair & Makeup FERN MADDEN DIANE DUSTING NATALIE VINCETICH BELINDA MOORE Post Producers ALEX BARRY LISA MATTHEWS Assistant Editors WAYNE C BLAIR ANNIE ZHANG Archive Consultant MIRIAM KENTER Graphics Designer THE KINGDOM OF LUDD Production Accountant LEAH HALL Stills Photographers PETER ADAMS JAMIE BILLING MARIA BOYADGIS RAYMOND MAHER MARK ROGERS PETER TARASUIK Post Production Facility DEFINITION FILMS SYDNEY Head of Post Production DAVID GROSS Online Editor
    [Show full text]
  • East-West Film Journal, Volume 5, No. 1
    EAST-WEST FILM JOURNAL VOLUME 5 . NUMBER 1 SPECIAL ISSUE ON MELODRAMA AND CINEMA Editor's Note I Melodrama/Subjectivity/Ideology: The Relevance of Western Melodrama Theories to Recent Chinese Cinema 6 E. ANN KAPLAN Melodrama, Postmodernism, and the Japanese Cinema MITSUHIRO YOSHIMOTO Negotiating the Transition to Capitalism: The Case of Andaz 56 PAUL WILLEMEN The Politics of Melodrama in Indonesian Cinema KRISHNA SEN Melodrama as It (Dis)appears in Australian Film SUSAN DERMODY Filming "New Seoul": Melodramatic Constructions of the Subject in Spinning Wheel and First Son 107 ROB WILSON Psyches, Ideologies, and Melodrama: The United States and Japan 118 MAUREEN TURIM JANUARY 1991 The East-West Center is a public, nonprofit educational institution with an international board of governors. Some 2,000 research fellows, grad­ uate students, and professionals in business and government each year work with the Center's international staff in cooperative study, training, and research. They examine major issues related to population, resources and development, the environment, culture, and communication in Asia, the Pacific, and the United States. The Center was established in 1960 by the United States Congress, which provides principal funding. Support also comes from more than twenty Asian and Pacific governments, as well as private agencies and corporations. Editor's Note UNTIL very recent times, the term melodrama was used pejoratively to typify inferior works of art that subscribed to an aesthetic of hyperbole and that were given to sensationalism and the crude manipulation of the audiences' emotions. However, during the last fifteen years or so, there has been a distinct rehabilitation of the term consequent upon a retheoriz­ ing of such questions as the nature of representation in cinema, the role of ideology, and female subjectivity in films.
    [Show full text]
  • Rosemary Ellen Guiley
    vamps_fm[fof]_final pass 2/2/09 10:06 AM Page i The Encyclopedia of VAMPIRES, WEREWOLVES, and OTHER MONSTERS vamps_fm[fof]_final pass 2/2/09 10:06 AM Page ii The Encyclopedia of VAMPIRES, WEREWOLVES, and OTHER MONSTERS Rosemary Ellen Guiley FOREWORD BY Jeanne Keyes Youngson, President and Founder of the Vampire Empire The Encyclopedia of Vampires, Werewolves, and Other Monsters Copyright © 2005 by Visionary Living, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher. For information contact: Facts On File, Inc. 132 West 31st Street New York NY 10001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Guiley, Rosemary. The encyclopedia of vampires, werewolves, and other monsters / Rosemary Ellen Guiley. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8160-4684-0 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN 978-1-4381-3001-9 (e-book) 1. Vampires—Encyclopedias. 2. Werewolves—Encyclopedias. 3. Monsters—Encyclopedias. I. Title. BF1556.G86 2004 133.4’23—dc22 2003026592 Facts On File books are available at special discounts when purchased in bulk quantities for businesses, associations, institutions, or sales promotions. Please call our Special Sales Department in New York at (212) 967-8800 or (800) 322-8755. You can find Facts On File on the World Wide Web at http://www.factsonfile.com Printed in the United States of America VB FOF 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 This book is printed on acid-free paper.
    [Show full text]
  • After the Ball David Williamson
    David Williamson’s first full-length play, The Coming of Stork, premiered at the La Mama Theatre, Carlton, in 1970 and later became the film Stork, directed by Tim Burstall. The Removalists and Don’s Party followed in 1971, then Jugglers Three (1972), What If You Died Tomorrow? (1973), The Department (1975), A Handful of Friends (1976), The Club (1977) and Travelling North (1979). In 1972 The Removalists won the Australian Writers’ Guild AWGIE Award for best stage play and the best script in any medium and the British production saw Williamson nominated most promising playwright by the London Evening Standard. The 1980s saw his success continue with Celluloid Heroes (1980), The Perfectionist (1982), Sons of Cain (1985), Emerald City (1987) and Top Silk (1989); whilst the 1990s produced Siren (1990), Money and Friends (1991), Brilliant Lies (1993), Sanctuary (1994), Dead White Males (1995), Heretic (1996), Third World Blues (an adaptation of Jugglers Three) and After the Ball (both in 1997), and Corporate Vibes and Face to Face (both in 1999). The Great Man (2000), Up for Grabs, A Conversation, Charitable Intent (all in 2001), Soulmates (2002), Birthrights (2003), Amigos, Flatfoot (both in 2004), Operator and Influence(both 2005) have since followed. Williamson is widely recognised as Australia’s most successful playwright and over the last thirty years his plays have been performed throughout Australia and produced in Britain, United States, Canada and many European countries. A number of his stage works have been adapted for the screen, including The Removalists, Don’s Party, The Club, Travelling North, Emerald City, Sanctuary and Brilliant Lies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cultural Traffic of Classic Indonesian Exploitation Cinema
    The Cultural Traffic of Classic Indonesian Exploitation Cinema Ekky Imanjaya Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of East Anglia School of Art, Media and American Studies December 2016 © This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. 1 Abstract Classic Indonesian exploitation films (originally produced, distributed, and exhibited in the New Order’s Indonesia from 1979 to 1995) are commonly negligible in both national and transnational cinema contexts, in the discourses of film criticism, journalism, and studies. Nonetheless, in the 2000s, there has been a global interest in re-circulating and consuming this kind of films. The films are internationally considered as “cult movies” and celebrated by global fans. This thesis will focus on the cultural traffic of the films, from late 1970s to early 2010s, from Indonesia to other countries. By analyzing the global flows of the films I will argue that despite the marginal status of the films, classic Indonesian exploitation films become the center of a taste battle among a variety of interest groups and agencies. The process will include challenging the official history of Indonesian cinema by investigating the framework of cultural traffic as well as politics of taste, and highlighting the significance of exploitation and B-films, paving the way into some findings that recommend accommodating the movies in serious discourses on cinema, nationally and globally.
    [Show full text]
  • DIRECT to YOUR INBOX EVERY MORNING Monday, April 27, 2020 | Dedicated to the Australasian Bloodstock Industry - Subscribe for Free: Click Here
    Monday, April 27, 2020 | Dedicated to the Australiasian bloodstock industry subscribe for free: Click here DIRECT TO YOUR INBOX EVERY MORNING Monday, April 27, 2020 | Dedicated to the Australasian bloodstock industry - subscribe for free: Click here WEEK AHEAD - PAGE 14 MORNING BRIEFING - PAGE 8 YESTERDAY'S RACE RESULTS - PAGE 17 Brutal’s fee set for first Read Tomorrow's Issue For: season at Newgate Stallion Watch The 2019 Doncaster Mile winner will stand for $27,500, GST What's on inclusive, as he joins Tassort at stud Race meetings: Grafton (NSW), Narromine (NSW), Wodonga (VIC), Albany (WA) Barrier trials/ Jump-outs: Warwick Farm (NSW), Grafton (NSW), Narromine (NSW), Cranbourne (VIC), Swan Hill (VIC), Moe (VIC) HONG KONG NEWS Purton creates history as Exultant takes QE II Cup Zac Purton was elated and deflated at the end Brutal SPORTPIX of Exultant's (Teofilo) glorious, grinding victory who bought the colt at the 2017 New Zealand in the HK$25 million FWD Queen Elizabeth II BY ANDREW HAWKINS | @ANZ_NEWS Bloodstock Karaka Premier Yearling Sale for Cup (Gr 1, 2000m) at Sha Tin yesterday. rutal (O’Reilly), the lightest-raced $220,000 from the draft of Mapperley Stud, sold The brave bay's willingness to stretch for winner of the Doncaster Mile (Gr 50 per cent to Newgate on the condition that he his rider through every demanding stride of the 1, 1600m) in the race’s 154-year raced on as a four-year-old. 2000-metre feature meant the champion jockey history, will serve his first mares at The Newgate Farm team, led by Slade and became the only rider in history to have won BNewgate Farm next season at a fee of $27,500 managing director Henry Field, have made every Group 1 race on the Hong Kong calendar.
    [Show full text]
  • What Killed Australian Cinema & Why Is the Bloody Corpse Still Moving?
    What Killed Australian Cinema & Why is the Bloody Corpse Still Moving? A Thesis Submitted By Jacob Zvi for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Faculty of Health, Arts & Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne © Jacob Zvi 2019 Swinburne University of Technology All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. II Abstract In 2004, annual Australian viewership of Australian cinema, regularly averaging below 5%, reached an all-time low of 1.3%. Considering Australia ranks among the top nations in both screens and cinema attendance per capita, and that Australians’ biggest cultural consumption is screen products and multi-media equipment, suggests that Australians love cinema, but refrain from watching their own. Why? During its golden period, 1970-1988, Australian cinema was operating under combined private and government investment, and responsible for critical and commercial successes. However, over the past thirty years, 1988-2018, due to the detrimental role of government film agencies played in binding Australian cinema to government funding, Australian films are perceived as under-developed, low budget, and depressing. Out of hundreds of films produced, and investment of billions of dollars, only a dozen managed to recoup their budget. The thesis demonstrates how ‘Australian national cinema’ discourse helped funding bodies consolidate their power. Australian filmmaking is defined by three ongoing and unresolved frictions: one external and two internal. Friction I debates Australian cinema vs. Australian audience, rejecting Australian cinema’s output, resulting in Frictions II and III, which respectively debate two industry questions: what content is produced? arthouse vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Episode 289 – Talking Sammo Hung | Whistlekickmartialartsradio.Com
    Episode 289 – Talking Sammo Hung | whistlekickMartialArtsRadio.com Jeremy Lesniak: Hey there, thanks for tuning in. Welcome, this is whistlekick martial arts radio and today were going to talk all about the man that I believe is the most underrated martial arts actor of today, possibly of all time, Sammo Hung. If you're new to the show you may not know my voice I'm Jeremy Lesniak, I'm the founder of whistlekick we make apparel and sparring gear and training aids and we produce things like this show. I wanna thank you for stopping by, if you want to check out the show notes for this or any of the other episodes we've done, you can find those over at whistlekickmartialartsradio.com. You find our products at whistlekick.com or on Amazon or maybe if you're one of the lucky ones, at your martial arts school because we do offer wholesale accounts. Thank you to everyone who has supported us through purchases and even if you aren’t wearing a whistlekick shirt or something like that right now, thank you for taking the time out of your day to listen to this episode. As I said, here on today's episode, were talking about one of the most respected martial arts actor still working today, a man who has been active in the film industry for almost 60 years. None other the Sammo Hung. Also known as Hung Kam Bow i'll admit my pronunciation is not always the best I'm doing what I can. Hung originates from Hong Kong where he is known not only as an actor but also as an action choreographer, producer, and director.
    [Show full text]
  • Marzo Abril 2012
    Marzo / Abril Año 3 | Nº 08 | Marzo / Abril 2012 CINÉFILO - REVISTA N° 08 | MARZO / ABRIL 2012 ¿Y si empezamos hablando de música? ¿O –peor- de Es ahora que convendría una pregunta: ¿es posible ese mundo? publicidad? Suponiendo que hemos logrado escribir la Una gran parte de lo que hoy llamamos “cultura” se parece al totalidad de esta revista en tiempo récord, diseñarla, ingresarla esfuerzo por codicar experiencias extrañas en forma de a imprenta en fecha prudente dadas las demoras herramientas susceptibles de incrementar ventas o de recaudar acostumbradas del rubro, recibirla, desempacarla y repartirla en impuestos. Es por esto que la subespecie del marketing nuestra función de apertura, podríamos decir que la semana conocida como gestión cultural resulta tan útil para acceder a pasada tocó Morrisey en Córdoba. Pero este texto está siendo cargos públicos. No es fácil, en estas circunstancias, frente a escrito antes, cuando eso aun no ocurrió. La pregunta entonces estos limitados conceptos del benecio, hacerle un lugar al arte. podría ser: ¿fue lo que se esperaba? Pero la cuestión es otra: ¿y si No es fácil saber con cuánto éxito uno consigue marcar uno no tuviera muy claro qué habría que esperar de algo? distancia. Venturosa, periódicamente, ocurre la alegría. Por ejemplo: el año pasado exhibimos un lm titulado Quei loro Por ocurrencia personal o de algún publicista, cuando lo incontri, de 2003, dirigido por Danièle Huillet y Jean-Marie retrataron para el ache de su gira actual, Morrisey posó con un Straub, la pareja más resistente del cine, también conocidos gato en la cabeza. Posiblemente un gag posmoderno de como los autores de las películas en que mayor cantidad de marketing, adquiere sin embargo una dimensión interesante al público abandona la sala.
    [Show full text]