DOCSLIB.ORG

Q3 2017 Internet & Digital Media Market Snapshot

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Q3 2017 Internet & Digital Media Market Snapshot STRICTLY PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL Q3 2017 Internet & Digital Media Market Snapshot Robert Berstein Frank Cordek Managing Director Director [email protected] [email protected] www.signalhill.com Baltimore│Bangalore│Boston │ Mumbai│Nashville│NewYork│Reston│San Francisco Table of Contents I. Public Company Universe and Trading Statistics II. Mergers and Acquisitions Activity III. Private Placement Activity IV. IPO Activity Strictly Private & Confidential 2 Quarterly Summary Public Company Trading Statistics1 M&A Activity 6.0x $32,000 120 4.9x 5.0x 2 96 4.1x 100 4.0x $24,000 of DealsNumber 4.0x 3.6x 3.7x 3.5x 72 80 3.0x 57 3.1x $16,000 48 51 60 2.5x 2.0x 2.8x 2.4x 2.3x 2.2x 40 3 EV / CY'17ERevenue $8,000 21 1.0x 20 Aggregate Deal Value ($M)Value DealAggregate 0.0x Q3 2016 Q3 2017 Q3 2016 Q3 2017 Q3 2016 Q3 2017 $0 0 Q3 2016 Q3 2017 Q3 2016 Q3 2017 Q3 2016 Q3 2017 Internet Content & Services e-Commerce Interactive Marketing & Marketing Services Internet Content & e-Commerce Interactive Marketing & Services Marketing Services Median Mean Private Placement Activity4 IPO Activity $4,000 40 34 2 $3,500 35 $32.00 28 $32.00 $3,000 30 of DealsNumber $26.00 $26.54 $2,500 21 25 $25.09 $24.00 $2,000 20 14 $1,500 13 15 $16.00 $15.00 9 3 $14.00 $13.56 $1,000 10 $13.00 $11.50 Aggregate DealValue ($M) $500 5 $8.90 $8.00 $0 0 Q3 2016 Q3 2017 Q3 2016 Q3 2017 Q3 2016 Q3 2017 Internet Content & Services e-Commerce Interactive Marketing & $0.00 Marketing Services RDFN DESP SECO ROKU ROVIO Offer Price Price as of 9/30/17 Source: Signal Hill Database of Core IDM Deals – Information collected from multiple industry sources Strictly Private & Confidential (1) Includes LTM’17 and ’16 Actuals (3) Includes only targets with significant North American operations 3 (2) Includes only values for which data is publicly available (4) Includes only transactions $10 million or greater PUBLIC COMPANY UNIVERSE I AND TRADING STATISTICS Signal Hill’s IDM Public Company Universe Transitioning Interactive Marketing Internet Content & Services e-Commerce Media & Marketing Services Diversified Traditional Marketing Technology Networks Data & Analytics Vertical Marketplace Ad Tech Diversified Publishers SMB-Focused Marketing Services e-Commerce Enabling Technology Note: IDM Universe excludes companies that have not achieved or maintained an Enterprise Value of at least $50M for the Strictly Private & Confidential previous 4 quarters (as of 9/30/2017) 5 IDM Public Companies Stock Price Performance LTM Sub-Sectors Performance vs. S&P 500 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% -30% 9/30/16 12/31/16 3/31/17 6/30/17 9/30/17 Signal Hill IDM Composite Internet Content and Services e-Commerce Interactive Marketing Marketing Services S&P 500 Strictly Private & Confidential 6 Internet Content & Services ($ in millions, except per share amounts) % Dec./Inc. Fully Fully Enterprise Value / (Price as of 9/30/2016) Price from LTM Diluted Diluted YoY Revenue Growth Revenue EBITDA Enterprise Value CY Revenues Company 9/30/2017 High Low Eq. Val. Net Cash Ent. Val. CY '17E CY '18E LTM CY '17E CY '18E LTM CY '17E CY '18E Revenue EBITDA Internet Content & Services Google $973.72 (3.5%) 30.9% $669,590 $90,758 $578,832 22.2% 17.6% 5.8x 5.3x 4.5x NM 13.3x 11.2x 5.8x 17.6x Microsoft 74.49 (1.9%) 32.3% 573,740 40,403 533,337 8.5% 7.8% 5.9x 5.3x 4.9x 17.5x 13.7x 12.7x 4.6x 14.3x Facebook 170.87 (2.6%) 50.5% 496,240 35,452 460,788 43.2% 30.0% 13.9x 11.8x 9.0x 25.5x 18.6x 14.6x 15.6x 31.2x Netflix 181.35 (5.3%) 85.8% 78,298 (2,672) 80,969 30.5% 22.3% 7.9x 7.0x 5.8x NM NM 45.4x 5.6x NM Weibo 98.94 (8.6%) 146.6% 21,632 606 21,026 67.3% 43.8% 28.7x 19.3x 13.4x NM 49.9x 30.3x 19.3x NM Snap Inc. 14.54 (50.6%) 28.9% 17,407 2,782 14,625 NA 84.2% 23.4x 16.5x 9.0x NM NM NM NM NM Yandex 32.95 (2.2%) 90.7% 10,709 644 10,065 33.9% 21.9% 7.1x 6.2x 5.1x 27.1x 19.1x 15.0x 5.8x 19.0x Twitter 16.87 (33.2%) 19.5% 12,389 2,334 10,055 (6.0%) 6.1% 4.1x 4.2x 3.9x NM 14.5x 13.4x 5.7x NM IAC/InterActiveCorp 117.58 (1.6%) 94.7% 9,378 (283) 9,661 1.6% 13.0% 3.1x 3.1x 2.7x 21.5x 16.3x 12.8x 1.7x 14.3x CoStar Group 268.25 (6.8%) 49.7% 9,580 260 9,320 14.5% 13.9% 10.4x 9.7x 8.5x 42.3x 34.0x 25.7x 8.8x 40.8x Zillow 40.15 (21.1%) 28.8% 7,387 223 7,165 26.2% 20.2% 7.4x 6.7x 5.6x NM 31.3x 23.0x 8.1x NM Match Group 23.19 (5.0%) 31.5% 6,256 (692) 6,948 4.6% 14.5% 5.4x 5.4x 4.7x 18.8x 15.3x 12.8x 4.9x 19.1x TripAdvisor 40.53 (38.7%) 14.7% 5,624 637 4,987 6.5% 10.1% 3.3x 3.1x 2.9x 24.9x 15.3x 14.9x 5.8x 41.2x Yelp 43.30 (2.1%) 60.8% 3,542 512 3,030 20.8% 17.9% 3.8x 3.5x 3.0x NM 20.2x 15.8x 4.5x NM Roku 26.54 (10.9%) 68.5% 2,515 (180) 2,695 NA NA 6.2x NA NA NM NA NA NM NM Zynga 3.78 (6.0%) 57.5% 3,271 739 2,532 13.1% 9.3% 3.3x 3.0x 2.8x NM 21.2x 16.9x 2.3x NM Pandora 7.70 (48.5%) 13.9% 1,868 (298) 2,166 8.8% 13.4% 1.5x 1.5x 1.3x NM NM NM 2.5x NM Chegg 14.84 (7.0%) 128.0% 1,591 66 1,525 (2.7%) 22.5% 6.0x 6.3x 5.1x NM 36.7x 22.4x 2.2x NM Blucora 25.30 (2.5%) 130.5% 1,137 (294) 1,431 11.2% 7.1% 2.9x 2.8x 2.7x 15.5x 14.3x 12.0x 3.1x 15.8x TrueCar 15.79 (27.4%) 86.4% 1,555 153 1,403 19.4% 14.4% 4.6x 4.3x 3.7x NM NM 32.4x 2.7x NM Bankrate 13.95 (2.1%) 96.5% 1,240 (108) 1,349 14.5% 12.1% 2.8x 2.7x 2.4x 13.3x 10.6x 9.6x 2.4x 10.4x Rovio 13.59 (6.8%) 1.3% 1,059 41 1,018 NA NA 3.4x NA NA 23.0x NA NA NM NM XO Group 19.67 (6.3%) 31.2% 486 98 388 6.6% 9.5% 2.5x 2.4x 2.2x 27.5x 13.8x 10.2x 2.7x 17.7x eHealth 23.89 (6.9%) 274.4% 443 66 377 (7.8%) 11.7% 2.2x 2.2x 2.0x NM NM NM 0.7x 7.6x Brightcove 7.20 (47.8%) 33.3% 247 28 220 1.8% 6.2% 1.4x 1.4x 1.3x NM NM 35.4x 2.8x NM Dice Holdings 2.60 (69.2%) 48.6% 131 (46) 178 (7.4%) 1.0% 0.8x 0.8x 0.8x 4.5x 4.2x 3.9x 1.9x 8.3x Spark Networks 1.22 (27.4%) 61.1% 39 10 29 (24.8%) 0.5% 1.0x 1.1x 1.1x NM 17.0x 15.5x 0.9x NM Median 4.1x 4.2x 3.7x 22.2x 16.3x 14.9x 3.8x 17.6x Mean 6.3x 5.4x 4.3x 21.8x 20.0x 18.5x 5.0x 19.8x Source: Capital IQ Median and Mean calculations exclude companies that have not achieved or maintained an Enterprise Value of $50m or more for four consecutive quarters EBITDA multiples >50x excluded All estimates from Capital IQ and calendarized unless otherwise noted (as of 9/30/17) Strictly Private & Confidential Enterprise Value calculated as Equity Value plus total debt, minority interest and preferred stock, less cash and equivalents 7 Internet Content & Services ($ in millions, except per share amounts) % Dec./Inc. Fully Fully Enterprise Value / (Price as of 9/30/2016) Price from LTM Diluted Diluted YoY Revenue Growth Revenue EBITDA Enterprise Value CY Revenues Company 9/30/2017 High Low Eq. Val. Net Cash Ent. Val. CY '17E CY '18E LTM CY '17E CY '18E LTM CY '17E CY '18E Revenue EBITDA Diversified Media Verizon $49.49 (9.7%) 15.6% $201,890 ($114,713) $316,603 (0.6%) 1.3% 2.6x 2.5x 2.5x 7.2x 7.0x 6.9x 2.4x 6.9x Comcast 38.48 (8.8%) 28.2% 181,371 (63,169) 244,540 5.8% 6.3% 2.9x 3.1x 2.9x 8.8x 8.6x 8.1x 2.8x 8.5x The Walt Disney Company 98.57 (15.1%) 9.1% 152,141 (21,371) 173,512 1.7% 4.9% 3.1x 3.1x 3.1x 10.3x 9.8x 9.2x 3.0x 9.3x Time Warner 102.45 (0.9%) 30.8% 79,686 (21,325) 101,011 5.9% 5.0% 3.4x 3.5x 3.3x 11.6x 11.5x 10.8x 3.0x 10.9x Twenty-First Century Fox 26.38 (19.1%) 9.7% 48,399 (15,660) 64,059 4.0% 4.8% 2.2x 2.3x 2.2x 9.0x 8.9x 8.1x 2.3x 9.6x CBS 58.00 (17.3%) 6.7% 23,312 (9,014) 32,326 (5.3%) 4.6% 2.4x 2.2x 2.4x 10.6x 10.2x 9.2x 2.3x 10.0x Viacom 27.84 (40.4%) 4.5% 11,634 (11,010) 22,644 6.0% 1.5% 1.7x 1.8x 1.7x 7.7x 7.3x 7.0x 2.1x 7.8x Discovery 21.29 (29.6%) 5.7% 11,628 (8,116) 19,744 3.9% 6.9% 3.1x 3.0x 2.9x 8.0x 7.9x 7.6x 3.7x 9.9x Scripps Networks Interactive 85.89 (2.9%) 41.7% 11,150 (3,129) 14,278 4.2% 3.9% 4.2x 4.2x 4.0x 9.3x 10.0x 9.7x 3.6x 7.6x Axel Springer 63.35 (7.3%) 35.0% 6,835 (1,974) 8,809 16.5% 4.0% 2.3x 2.5x 2.2x 14.2x 11.6x 10.7x 1.9x 11.7x News Corp.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Electronic Evidence Examiner
    2 Table of Contents About Electronic Evidence Examiner How To .......................................................................12 How to Work with Cases .........................................................................................................13 How to Create New Case .......................................................................................................13 How to Enable Automatic Case Naming .................................................................................14 How to Define Case Name During Automatic Case Creation .................................................14 How to Open Existing Case....................................................................................................15 How to Save Case to Archive .................................................................................................16 How to Change Default Case Location ...................................................................................16 How to Add Data to Case ........................................................................................................17 How to Add Evidence .............................................................................................................18 How to Acquire Devices .........................................................................................................20 How to Import Mobile Data .....................................................................................................21 How to Import Cloud Data ......................................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Machine Learning Is Driving an Innovation Wave in Saas Software
    Machine Learning is Driving an Innovation Wave in SaaS Software By Jeff Houston, CFA [email protected] | 512.364.2258 SaaS software vendors are enhancing their soluti ons with machine learning (ML) algorithms. ML is the ability of a computer to either automate or recommend appropriate actions by applying probability to data with a feedback loop that enables learning. We view ML as a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), which represents a broad collection of tools that include/leverage ML, such as natural language processing (NLP), self-driving cars, and robotics as well as some that are tangent to ML, such as logical rule-based algorithms. Although there have been multiple “AI Winters” since the 1950s where hype cycles were followed by a dearth of funding, ML is now an enduring innovation driver, in our opinion, due in part to the increasing ubiquity of affordable cloud-based processing power, data storage—we expect the pace of breakthroughs to accelerate. automation, customer support, marketing, and human resources) through both organic and M&A These innovations will make it easier for companies initiatives. As for vertical-specific solutions, we think to benefit beyond what is available with traditional that a new crop of vendors will embrace ML and business intelligence (BI) solutions, like IBM/ achieve billion-dollar valuations. VCs are making big Cognos and Tableau, that simply describe what bets that these hypotheses will come to fruition as happened in the past. New ML solutions are demonstrated by the $5B they poured into 550 amplifying intelligence while enabling consistent and startups using AI as a core part of their solution in better-informed reasoning, behaving as thought 20162.
    [Show full text]
  • Google Search Bar & Search Term History
    DFIR Review Google Search Bar & Search Term History - Are You Finding Everything? Joshua Hickman Published on: May 26, 2020 License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0) DFIR Review Google Search Bar & Search Term History - Are You Finding Everything? Synopsis Forensic question: What information can be located regarding searches conducted in the Google search bar? OS Version: Nougat (8.55.6.21) Oreo (8.91.5.21) Tools: WinHex, Version 19.7 (Specialist License) Cellebrite UFED 4PC, Version 7.10.1.1080 (Nougat) Cellebrite UFED 4PC, Version 7.12.1.100 (Oreo) DCode Version 4.02a Google Protocol Buffers, Version 3.7.1 DB Browser for SQLite, Version 3.10.1 Cellebrite Physical Analyzer, Version 7.15.1.1 Cellebrite Physical Analyzer, Version 7.16.0.93 Internet Evidence Finder, Version 6.23.1.15677 2 DFIR Review Google Search Bar & Search Term History - Are You Finding Everything? Introduction Search history. It is an excellent way to peer into someone’s mind and see what they are thinking at a particular moment in time. In a court room, search history can be used to show intent (mens rea). There are plenty of examples where search history has been used in court to establish a defendant’s intent. Probably the most gruesome was the New York City Cannibal Cop trial, where prosecutors used the accused’s search history against him. Of course, there is a fine line between intent and protected speech under the First Amendment. Over the past month and a half I have published a couple of blog posts dealing with Google Assistant and some of the artifacts it leaves behind, which you can find here and here.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Impacts of Google Cloud September 2018 Economic and Social Impacts of Google Cloud |
    Economic and social impacts of Google Cloud September 2018 Economic and social impacts of Google Cloud | Contents Executive Summary 03 Introduction 10 Productivity impacts 15 Social and other impacts 29 Barriers to Cloud adoption and use 38 Policy actions to support Cloud adoption 42 Appendix 1. Country Sections 48 Appendix 2. Methodology 105 This final report (the “Final Report”) has been prepared by Deloitte Financial Advisory, S.L.U. (“Deloitte”) for Google in accordance with the contract with them dated 23rd February 2018 (“the Contract”) and on the basis of the scope and limitations set out below. The Final Report has been prepared solely for the purposes of assessment of the economic and social impacts of Google Cloud as set out in the Contract. It should not be used for any other purposes or in any other context, and Deloitte accepts no responsibility for its use in either regard. The Final Report is provided exclusively for Google’s use under the terms of the Contract. No party other than Google is entitled to rely on the Final Report for any purpose whatsoever and Deloitte accepts no responsibility or liability or duty of care to any party other than Google in respect of the Final Report and any of its contents. As set out in the Contract, the scope of our work has been limited by the time, information and explanations made available to us. The information contained in the Final Report has been obtained from Google and third party sources that are clearly referenced in the appropriate sections of the Final Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Youtube-8M Video Classification
    YouTube-8M Video Classification Alexandre Gauthier and Haiyu Lu Stanford University 450 Serra Mall Stanford, CA 94305 [email protected] [email protected] Abstract metadata. To this end, Google has released the YouTube- 8M dataset [1]. This set of over 8 million labeled videos al- Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have been lows the public to train algorithms to learn how to associate widely applied for image classification. Encouraged by labels with YouTube videos, helping to solve the problem these results, we apply a CNN model to large scale video of video classification. classification using the recently published YouTube-8M We use multilayer convolutional neural networks to clas- dataset, which contains more than 8 million videos labeled sify YouTube-8M videos. The input to our algorithm is with 4800 classes. We study models with different archi- pre-processed video data taken from individual frames of tectures, and find best performance on a 3-layer spatial- the videos. We then use a CNN to output a score for each temporal CNN ([CNN-BatchNormzliation-LeakyReLU]3- label in the vocabulary. We briefly tried LSTM and fully- FullyConnected). We propose that this is because this connected models, but found that convolutional models per- model takes both feature and frame information into ac- form better. count. By optimizing hyperparameters including learning rate, we achieve a Hit@1 of 79.1%, a significant improve- 2. Related Work ment over the 64.5% for the best model Google trained in Large-scale datasets such as ImageNet [2] have played their initial analysis. Further improvements may be achiev- a crucial role for the rapid progress of image recognition able by incorporating audio information into our models.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Resume Book
    Class of 2019 STUDENT RESUME BOOK [email protected] CLASS OF 2019 PROFILE 46 48% WOMEN CLASS SIZE PRIOR COMPANIES Feldsted & Scolney 2 Amazon.com, Inc Fincare Small Finance Bank American Airlines Group General Electric Co AVERAGE YEARS American Family Insurance Mu Sigma, Inc PRIOR WORK Bank of New York, Qualtrics LLC EXPERIENCE Melloncorp Quantiphi Inc Brookhurst Insurance Skyline Technologies Services TechLoss Consulting & CEB Inc Restoration, Inc Cecil College ThoughtWorks, Inc Darwin Labs US Army Economists, Inc UCSD Guardian United Health Group, Inc PRIOR DEGREE Welch Consulting, Ltd CONCENTRATIONS ZS Associates Inc & BACKGROUND* MATH & STATISTICS 82.61% ENGINEERING 32.61% ECONOMICS 30.43% COMPUTER SCIENCE & IT 19.57% SOCIAL SCIENCES 13.04% HUMANITIES 10.87% BUSINESS 8.70% OTHER SCIENCES 8.70% *many students had multiple majors or OTHER 8.70% specializations; for example, of the 82.61% of students with a math and/or statistics DATA SCIENCE 2.17% background, most had an additional major or concentration and therefore are represented in additional categories. 0 20 40 60 80 100 Class of 2019 SAURABH ANNADATE ALICIA BURRIS ALEX BURZINSKI TED CARLSON IVAN CHEN ANGELA CHEN CARSON CHEN HARISH CHOCKALINGAM SABARISH CHOCKALINGAM TONY COLUCCI JD COOK SOPHIE DU JAMES FAN MICHAEL FEDELL JOYCE FENG NATHAN FRANKLIN TIAN FU ELLIOT GARDNER MAX HOLIBER NAOMI KADUWELA MATT KEHOE JOE KUPRESANIN MICHEL LEROY JONATHAN LEWYCKYJ Class of 2019 HENRY PARK KAREN QIAN FINN QIAO RACHEL ROSENBERG SHREYAS SABNIS SURABHI SETH TOVA SIMONSON MOLLY SROUR
    [Show full text]
  • Ransomware and G Suite Business: What You Need to Know
    EBOOK Pull text goes here and bold some of the copy Ransomware and G Suite Business: What You Need to Know 1 | backupify.com Pull text goes here Theand boldRansomware some Problem of the copy Small to enterprise sized businesses face an enormous computer security challenge. They have hundreds -- or thousands -- of accounts to manage. In most cases, not every account holder will ! have the training or knowledge to take the proper measures to keep the organization’s data secure. With multiple accounts, there’s a pretty good chance that someone will encounter malware. It just takes an accidental click or two to download and install. Ransomware encrypts your files then demands payment. The ransom notification promises that if you pay, you’ll receive an unlock code to decrypt your files. Of course, you have to pay in a hard-to- trace cryptocurrency. If you don’t pay, some variants delete your files -- a few at first, then more over time. Don’t think a reboot will help: that just spurs the software to delete your data. And even if you pay, you might not get your data back. You have absolutely no reason to trust the thieves behind the ransomware. Once they have your money, why would they bother to give you an unlock code that works? And why would you expect ransomware distributors to create bug-free code? There’s a decent chance they’re effective criminals, but lousy coders. Cloud apps and storage, such as G Suite and Google Drive, offer some protection from ransomware. New files you create online will be safe.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of Machine Learning with Google Cloud Platform
    Cloud Computing Implementation of Machine learning with Google cloud platform Referent : Prof. Dr. Christian Baun Submitted by: Ammar Albaalbaki(1267651) Anish Joys Yesuadimai Michael(1280214) Eigenständigkeitserklärung Ich versichere wahrheitsgemäß, die Arbeit selbstständig angefertigt, alle benutzten Hilfsmittel vollständig und genau angegeben und alles kenntlich gemacht zu haben, was aus Arbeiten anderer unverändert oder mit Abänderungen entnommen wurde. __________________ Ammar Albaalbaki Ich versichere wahrheitsgemäß, die Arbeit selbstständig angefertigt, alle benutzten Hilfsmittel vollständig und genau angegeben und alles kenntlich gemacht zu haben, was aus Arbeiten anderer unverändert oder mit Abänderungen entnommen wurde. ------------------------------ Anish joys yesuadimai michael Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation 1 1.2 Purpose 1 1.3 The aim of the work 2 2 Fundamental 4 2.1 Google Cloud 4 2.2 Machine Learning 5 2.2.1 Supervised Learning 6 2.3 Image Processing 7 2.4 Webhosting 8 2.4.1 Basic of response and request 9 2.4.2 Describe PHP 9 2.4.3 Putty to connection with host 10 3 Implementation 11 3.1 Log in Google Cloud 11 3.2 Google Cloud Storage 11 3.3 Datalab for implementing image processing 14 3.4 Create Web Host 19 4 Evaluation and results 23 5 Summary and outlook 24 5.1 Summary 24 5.2 outlook 24 List of Figures I List of tables II References III Page I 1 Introduction Cloud computing is a very hot and booming topic in the current era, lots of companies have already moved to cloud computing technologies and many companies are urging to move to cloud.
    [Show full text]
  • Transfer Your Gmail and Drive with Google Takeout for Schools
    Transfer your Gmail and Drive with Google Takeout for Schools You can take it with you! Transfer your Gmail and Drive with Google Takeout for Schools Change is a part of life: Maybe you are a high school senior or a college student and you are graduating. Or perhaps you are a student who is moving to a new school. You might be a teacher who is taking a job at a new school district. Or maybe you are an educator who is retiring after many years of service. In each situation, it is very possible you may have a Google account. G Suite may be used at your high school, your college, and any one of your jobs. So what happens to your Google account when you graduate high school, graduate college, move from one job to another, and eventually retire? You will have built up years of emails, documents, slideshows, and much more. Is there an easy way to take all those files and all that data with you? What would be great would be a simple tool to copy all of your files to a different Google account (such as your personal Gmail account). Well, thankfully we have that with Google Takeout for Schools. This is a very simple and free tool that will copy the emails and Drive files from your school account over to either a personal Gmail account or another G Suite for Education account. See below for a video demonstrating all the steps, as well as written direction on the process. Tutorial Video (9 minutes) Directions for Copying Gmail and Drive For the first step you need to have two different Google accounts, the source account that you are copying from and the destination account that you are copying to.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloud Forensics: Google
    Hackinbo 2018 Cloud Forensics: Google Extracting Google Account data © ElcomSoft Ltd. www.elcomsoft.com 1 Google Forensics In This Presentation § Cloud and Over-the-Air Acquisition § Synchronized data § Passwords § Two-Factor Authentication 2 Cloud Forensics Cloud Acquisition: Why? • Helps dealing with locked and encrypted devices • Android 6 and up encrypted by default • Google Account may contain more data than the phone itself • Last resort: may succeed where all other methods fail • Google collects information from all signed-in devices 3 Page 3 Cloud Forensics Cloud Acquisition Helps Bypass All of This: • Secure Lock Screen • Locked Bootloader • Factory Reset Protection (FRP) • Full-Disk Encryption (FDE) and File-Based Encryption (FBE) • Device is broken, wiped, or locked 4 Page 4 Google Forensics Google: Why Cloud Forensics? • Tens of thousand device models • Several thousand manufacturers • Extreme platform fragmentation • Not every Android device is a Google device • Acquisition approaches vary Google Account acquisition • Single point of entry • Unified approach • Impressive amount of information 5 Page 5 Google Forensics Android Open Source vs. Google Mobile Services • Not every Android device is a Google device • AOSP does not mean GMS • Google collects data from other sources if user signs in to: • Chrome browser • Google Maps • Gmail • Google Search • Including competing platforms 6 Page 6 Google Forensics Google Collects Data from Multiple Sources • Multiple devices • Mac • Windows • iPhone • iPad + 23 more • …and Android
    [Show full text]
  • Google Data Collection —NEW—
    Digital Content Next January 2018 / DCN Distributed Content Revenue Benchmark Google Data Collection —NEW— August 2018 digitalcontentnext.org CONFIDENTIAL - DCN Participating Members Only 1 This research was conducted by Professor Douglas C. Schmidt, Professor of Computer Science at Vanderbilt University, and his team. DCN is grateful to support Professor Schmidt in distributing it. We offer it to the public with the permission of Professor Schmidt. Google Data Collection Professor Douglas C. Schmidt, Vanderbilt University August 15, 2018 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Google is the world’s largest digital advertising company.1 It also provides the #1 web browser,2 the #1 mobile platform,3 and the #1 search engine4 worldwide. Google’s video platform, email service, and map application have over 1 billion monthly active users each.5 Google utilizes the tremendous reach of its products to collect detailed information about people’s online and real-world behaviors, which it then uses to target them with paid advertising. Google’s revenues increase significantly as the targeting technology and data are refined. 2. Google collects user data in a variety of ways. The most obvious are “active,” with the user directly and consciously communicating information to Google, as for example by signing in to any of its widely used applications such as YouTube, Gmail, Search etc. Less obvious ways for Google to collect data are “passive” means, whereby an application is instrumented to gather information while it’s running, possibly without the user’s knowledge. Google’s passive data gathering methods arise from platforms (e.g. Android and Chrome), applications (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Machine Learning in Google Drive
    Senior Staff Software Engineer, Google Google I/O Extended Boulder 8-May-2018 #io18extended ...like space :) #spaceishard Spaceflight is unforgiving and complicated. But it’s not a miracle. It can be done #intelligenceishard ● Fundamentals of machine learning are complicated; ML is easily misapplied ● Doing “toy” things with ML is easy. ○ Doing useful things is a lot harder How to get there from here? ● Start small, but real ● Measure. Be rigorous. Make sure you’re helping ● Have a compelling UX ● Launch. Iterate. Improve. ● Never forget the user #io18extended Drive Quick Access Main Idea: Prominently show the user's documents and files they likely want to open right now Benefit 1: Save Users Time ● Quick Access gets users to their files 50% faster… and with less cognitive friction Benefit 2: Enable users to make better business decisions ● Show users relevant documents to their pending business decisions, including documents they may not be aware of. (The right information at the right time.) #io18extended Drive Quick Access: Mobile (Android and iOS) #io18extended What we’ve learned: Quick Access Feature Intelligence works ● Training and using Machine Learning models results in improved metrics beyond a simple “Most Recently Used” across all metrics Quick Access saves users time ● About 50% of opens come from QA, each one saves 50% on “finding time” Starting Point for Future Work ● Quick Access has proven out our machine learning infrastructure for Drive and provides a framework for future intelligence features. #io18extended Quick Access
    [Show full text]