DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Resources Development, State of Utah, 1987

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Resources Development, State of Utah, 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers South Pacific Division Water Resources Development in Utah 1987 TC 423 .A15 UTAH 1987 This publication is authorized by the Secretary of the Army as required by PL 99-662 WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT State of Utah 1987 HECSATecImKal Library Foreword Enactment of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986 provides our Nation with a framework for water resources development until well into the 21st century. The law has made numerous changes in the way potential new projects are studied, evaluated and funded. The major change is that nonfederal cost sharing is specified for most Corps water resources projects. A new partnership now exists between the federal government and nonfederal inter­ ests that affords the latter a key role in project planning and allows the federal government to spread its resources over more water projects than would have been possible before. With the passage of this law, the federal water resources program is in better shape than at any time in the past 16 years. The law authorizes over 260 new projects for inland naviga­ tion, harbor improvement, flood control, and shore protection—with additional benefits in water supply, hydropower and recreation. I hope this booklet gives you a glimpse of the extent, variety and importance of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers water resources development activities in your state. JOHN S. DOYLE, JR. Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) To Our Readers Our Nation's water resources program, as well as our Constitution, may well have been born on the banks of the Potomac River in the 1780s out of a disagreement between Virginia and Maryland. Both states claimed jurisdiction over navigation on the Potomac and Pokemoke Rivers and the Chesapeake Bay. Under the Articles of Confederation, the Continental Congress did not have the power to resolve the dispute and regulate commerce. Fortunately, the states decided to meet to settle the matter. A convention was held at Mount Vernon in 1785; and again in Annapolis in 1786. Out of those two meetings grew the belief that a strong central government was needed. At the very least, the Articles of Confederation needed to be amended. The convention attendees petitioned Congress in February 1787 and the Constitutional Convention was held in Phila­ delphia that May. Thus, in celebrating the bicentennial of the United States Constitution this year, we are, in a way, celebrating the birth of our water resources program. The program encompasses port and river nagivation improvements, flood damage reduction, beach erosion control, hydro- power generation, water storage, development regulation in navigable waters and wetlands, and recreation. In all, the Corps manages almost 2,000 water resource projects across the nation. It does this in cooperation with local interests and other federal agencies. This year, the Corps has the additional challenges of the projects authorized by Public Law 99-662, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This act lays the foundation for water resource development for generations to come. This booklet is one of a series detailing water resources programs in the 50 states and U.S. possessions. I hope you find it interesting and useful. E.R. HEIBERG III Lieutenant General, USA Chief of Engineers Further information on specific Corps activities, projects, and programs in Utah is available from the following offices: U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Pacific 630 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-2206 (415) 556-5630 U.S. Army Engineer District, Los Angeles 300 N. Los Angeles Street Los Angeles, CA 90053-2325 (213) 894-5320 U.S. Army Engineer District, Sacramento 650 Capitol Mall Sacramento, CA 95814-4794 (916) 551-2526 U.S. Army Engineer District, Walla Walla Building 602, City-County Airport Walla Walla, WA 99362-9265 (509) 522-6660 II TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Cooperation in Projects of Other Agencies 9 Civil Works Overview 1 Drainage Basins of Utah 9 The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and its Activities in Utah 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Authority for Corps of Engineers Great Salt Lake Basin 10 Little Dell Lake 10 Authorization and Planning Process for Water Jordan River at Salt Lake City 11 Resources Projects 2 Kays Creek at Layton 11 Principles and Guidelines 2 Section 7 Projects 11 Major Steps in the Planning, Design and Jordan River Basin 11 Implementation of Civil Works Projects 2 Wasatch Front and Central Utah 12 Two-Phase Study Process 4 Great Salt Lake 12 Reconnaissance Phase 4 Bear River and Tributaries 12 Feasibility Phase 4 Weber River and Tributaries 12 Continuing Authorities Program 4 Sevier Lake Basin 13 Planning Process for Continuing Redmond Channel Improvement 13 Authorities Program Projects 5 Big Wash Diversion Dam and Channel 13 Sevier River and Tributaries 14 Projects Approved by the Public Works Committees ... 5 Green River Basin 15 Project Deauthorization 5 Section 7 Projects 15 How Local Interests Share in Federal Projects 5 Colorado River and Tributaries Above Lee Ferry.. 15 Flood Control and Flood Plain Management 5 Colorado-San Juan Basin 17 Navigation 6 Colorado River and Tributaries Above Lee Ferry.. 17 Shore and Hurricane Protection 6 Navajo Indian Reservation 17 Hydropower 7 Virgin River Near St. George 18 Water Supply 7 Environmental Quality 7 FLOODS AND EMERGENCY OPERATIONS Utah Floods 1982-1985 19 Regulatory Programs 7 Emergency Operations 1982-1985 19 Recreation 7 Dam Inspection Program 8 GLOSSARY 20 Emergency Work 8 Reevaluation of Completed Projects 8 INDEX 23 III Introduction Through its civil works program, the Corps carries out a Civil Works Overview comprehensive nationwide effort in water resources plan­ From 1775 to the present, the U.S. Army Corps of Engi­ ning, construction, and operation. These activities are car­ neers has served the nation in peace and war. ried out in accordance with directives from Congress and Formed by General George Washington during the Revo­ are supervised by the Chief of Engineers under the direction lutionary War as the engineering and construction arm of of the Secretary of the Army. In close cooperation with the Continental Army, the Corps built fortifications and other federal agencies, and with interested state and local coastal batteries to strengthen the country's defenses and authorities and organizations, the Corps works to provide went on to found the Military Academy at West Point, to beneficial improvements desired by local citizens. help open the West, and to develop the Nation's water The civil works program is directed toward developing resources. Today it is the largest engineering organization in water resources in a way that will lead to the satisfaction of the world. all water related requirements—both immediate and long Although the primary mission of the Corps has always range. Among other needs, these include improvements for been to provide combat support to our fighting Army, the navigation, flood control, major drainage, water supply for nation over the years also needed roads, railroads, light­ irrigation and municipal-industrial uses, water quality con­ houses, bridges, and other works of engineering. Conse­ trol and waste water disposal, hydropower, water oriented quently, since the period immediately following the Revolu­ recreation, enhancement of fish and wildlife resources, and tionary War, the Corps has carried out numerous civil the preservation of aesthetic and ecological values. Special works responsibilities, and since 1824, it has been the prin­ emphasis is being placed on flood plain management in cipal developer of the Nation's water resources. support of a national effort to reduce flood losses through Ever responsive to the changing needs and demands of appropriate state and local regulation of the use of flood the American people, the Corps has planned and executed prone areas. national programs for navigation, flood control, water supply, hydroelectric power, recreation, conservation, and The first Corps of Engineers civil works activities in Utah preservation of the environment. In its military role, the were investigations of navigation on the Green River in the Corps plans, designs and supervises the construction of late 1880s. The basis of the now ongoing civil works pro­ modern facilities which are necessary to ensure the combat gram was the 1938 Flood Control Act, which contained readiness of our Army and Air Force. authority for the Corps of Engineers to make flood control investigations on streams draining into the Great Salt Lake and the Great Basin, and the Upper Colorado River and The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers tributaries above Lee Ferry, Arizona. Preliminary studies and Its Activities in Utah resulted in recommendations for detailed investigations of streams in Davis County and the Bear, Weber, Jordan, and The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has been the princi­ Sevier River Basins. Subsequently, authority for other stud­ pal water resources agency of the federal government since ies was provided and flood control projects were authorized 1824. The earliest activities in Utah attributable to the and constructed. Corps of Engineers trace back to the initial surveys for the transcontinental railroad during the 1850s. In 1869, the In the 1930s, Corps of Engineers activities in Utah were Corps of Engineers began work on a series of topographical under the jurisdiction of the Los Angeles District. A subof- and geographical surveys and explorations of the area west fice of the District was established in Salt Lake City in of the 100th meridian, which includes the State of Utah. 1940, and from April 1942 to October 1943, a separate The objective of these surveys was Corps of Engineers district existed. In addition to most of ... that the physical structures of the waste and Utah, the Salt Lake District included parts of Nevada, unknown lands along the untenanted mountain fron­ Idaho, Wyoming, and Colorado. In 1943, the Salt Lake tiers shall be brought to light and made known not District was abolished and the Great Basin portion of the only for the uses of Government, but for all of the State was assigned to the Sacramento District, and the people for all time.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Stratigraphic Importance of the Brontothere (Cf. Diplacodon Elatus) in the Brennan Basin Member of the Duchesne River Formation of Utah
    Foss. Rec., 17, 69–74, 2014 www.foss-rec.net/17/69/2014/ doi:10.5194/fr-17-69-2014 © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License. The stratigraphic importance of the brontothere (cf. Diplacodon elatus) in the Brennan Basin Member of the Duchesne River Formation of Utah B. J. Burger and L. Tackett II Department of Geology, Utah State University, Uintah Basin Regional Campus 320 North Aggie Blvd. Vernal, UT 84078, USA Correspondence to: B. J. Burger ([email protected]) Received: 10 June 2014 – Revised: 6 August 2014 – Accepted: 12 August 2014 – Published: 27 August 2014 Abstract. We report on the first occurrence of an early southern Mississippia (Gazin and Sullivan, 1942), and the horned brontothere in the Brennan Basin Member of the Pacific Northwest (Mihlbacher, 2007). But nowhere is the Duchesne River Formation in northeastern Utah. This is the record of brontotheres as diverse as the fossil record ob- first record of a brontothere from the Brennan Basin Member. tained from the middle Eocene depositional basins located in Previously, brontotheres have been reported from the higher northeastern Utah, southwestern Wyoming and northwestern stratigraphic La Point Member (Duchesneodus uintensis) Colorado (Lull, 1905; Cook, 1926; Douglass, 1909; Gregory, and the lower stratigraphic Uinta Formation (Sphenocoelus 1912; Gunnell and Yarborough, 2000; Hatcher, 1895; Lucas uintensis, Fossendorhinus diploconus, Metarhinus fluviatilis, et al., 2004; Lucas and Holbrook, 2004; Lucas and Schoch, Metarhinus abbotti, Sthenodectes incisivum, Metatelmath- 1982; Mader, 2000, 2009a, b, Mihlbacher, 2008, 2011; Os- erium ultimum, Protitanotherium emarginatum, Pollyosbor- born, 1889, 1895, 1908, 1913, 1929; Peterson, 1914a, b, nia altidens, Diplacodon elatus).
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources Development by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in Utah
    DEVELOPMENT W&M U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS TC SOU TH PACIFIC DIVI SI O N 423 • A15 1977 Utah 1977 M ■ - z//>A ;^7 /WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ec by THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS in UTAH JANUARY 1977 ADDRESS INQUIRIES TO DIVISION ENGINEER U.S. Army Engineer Division South Pacific Corps of Engineers 630 Sansome Street San Fransisco, California 94111 DISTRICT ENGINEER DISTRICT ENGINEER U.S. Army Engineer District U.S. Army Engineer District Los Angeles Corps of Engineers Sacramento Federal Building Corps of Engineers 300 North Los Angeles Street Federal and Courts Building Los Angeles, California 90012 (P.O. Box 2711 650 Capitol Mall Los Angeles, California 90053) Sacramento, California 95814 TO OUR READERS: Throughout history, water has played a dominant role in shaping the destinies of nations and entire civilizations. The early settlement and development of our country occurred along our coasts and water courses. The management of our land and water resources was the catalyst which enabled us to progress from a basically rural and agrarian economy to the urban and industrialized nation we are today. Since the General Survey Act of 1824, the US Army Corps of Engineers has played a vital role in the development and management of our national water resources. At the direction of Presidents and with Congressional authorization and funding, the Corps of Engineers has planned and executed major national programs for navigation, flood control, water supply, hydroelectric power, recreation and water conservation which have been responsive to the changing needs and demands of the American people for 152 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Duchesne From: Utah Place Names
    Fort Duchesne from: Utah Place Names FORT DUCHESNE* (Uintah County) was near the Uinta River, one mile south of US-40. The site was originally a fur-trading post prior to 1841. In August 1861, the fort was established under the Lincoln presidency. On August 20, 1886, two troops of black men from the Ninth Cavalry, under Major F. W. Benteen, moved in. They served at the fort for twelve years. Because of their dark curly hair, the Indians called the troops buffalo soldiers. The fort was abandoned in 1912, then re-established as the headquarters for the Uintah Reservation. See Duchesne River below for name source. >S23,T2S,R1E,USM; 4,988' (1,520m). Bibliography: Our Pioneer Heritage, 17 vols. Daughters of the Utah Pioneers. (v17). Deseret News. Salt Lake City: Deseret News Publishing Company. (6 Oct. 1934). Greer, Deon C., et al. Atlas of Utah. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press, 1981. Personal place name manuscript records. Stegner, Wallace. Beyond the Hundredth Meridian. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1954. Utah Historical Quarterly. Salt Lake City: Utah State Historical Society. (v2,no.1). Utah State Historical Society. Unpublished Archives on Geographic Names. DUCHESNE RIVER (Duchesne County, Uintah County) originates at the southwestern section of the Uinta Mountains at the foot of Mount Agassiz. The river drains south southeast through Duchesne* into the Green River. Prior to 1875 the present Duchesne River was known as the Uinta River. As one of the more historic and prominent rivers of Utah, there has been much confusion in past writings as to the river's name history and relative relationships with the mouths of the nearby White and Uinta rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Salinity Loads and Trends in the Duchesne River Basin and Parts of the Middle Green River Basin, Utah
    9/28/2016 Comparison of Changes in Dissolved-Solids Loads Estimated from Streamflow and Water-Quality Data to Estimates from Changing Irrigation Methods, Uinta Basin Area, Utah Susan Thiros U.S. Geological Survey Utah Water Science Center August 25, 2016 Background • Dissolved solids from the Green River affect the suitability of Colorado River water for downstream uses. • Agricultural activities were estimated to contribute 43% of dissolved-solids load in Colorado River at Lees Ferry, Arizona. • Study done in cooperation with the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Forum to assess trends in dissolved-solids load in Uinta Basin. 1 9/28/2016 Green River Basin Yampa River and White River Basin Colorado River Basin Objectives • Estimate annual dissolved-solids load at selected sites in the basin that drain either natural land, agricultural land, or both • Determine trends in dissolved-solids load at these sites • Compare changes in dissolved-solids load to estimates made by the Natural Resources Conservation Service and Bureau of Reclamation 2 9/28/2016 Sprinkler Flood Urban Mean daily streamflow at selected gaging stations in the Uinta Basin study area, water years 1989 through 2013 3 9/28/2016 Dissolved-Solids Load Load = (Concentration) x (Flow) x (CF) Where • Load is estimated dissolved-solid load, in tons per unit time • Concentration is dissolved-solids concentration, in milligrams per liter • Flow is streamflow, in cubic feet per second • CF is conversion factor (0.002697 for tons per day) LOADEST Regression Models Regression equation
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Beaver County, Utah Centennial County History Series
    A HISTORY OF 'Beaver County Martha Sonntag Bradley UTAH CENTENNIAL COUNTY HISTORY SERIES A HISTORY OF 'Beaver County Martha Sonntag Bradley The settlement of Beaver County began in February 1856 when fifteen families from Parowan moved by wagon thirty miles north to Beaver Valley. The county was created by the Utah legislature on 31 January 1856, a week before the Parowan group set out to make their new home. However, centuries before, prehistoric peoples lived in the area, obtaining obsidian for arrow and spear points from the Mineral Mountains. Later, the area became home to Paiute Indians. Franciscan Friars Dominguez and Escalante passed through the area in October 1776. The Mormon settlement of Beaver devel­ oped at the foot of the Tushar Mountains. In 1859 the community of Minersville was es­ tablished, and residents farmed, raised live­ stock, and mined the lead deposits there. In the last quarter of the nineteenth century the Mineral Mountains and other locations in the county saw extensive mining develop­ ment, particularly in the towns of Frisco and Newhouse. Mining activities were given a boost with the completion of the Utah South­ ern Railroad to Milford in 1880. The birth­ place of both famous western outlaw Butch Cassidy and inventor of television Philo T. Farnsworth, Beaver County is rich in history, historic buildings, and mineral treasures. ISBN: 0-913738-17-4 A HISTORY OF 'Beaver County A HISTORY OF Beaver County Martha Sonntag Bradley 1999 Utah State Historical Society Beaver County Commission Copyright © 1999 by Beaver County Commission All rights reserved ISBN 0-913738-17-4 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 98-61325 Map by Automated Geographic Reference Center—State of Utah Printed in the United States of America Utah State Historical Society 300 Rio Grande Salt Lake City, Utah 84101-1182 Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vii GENERAL INTRODUCTION ix CHAPTER 1 Beaver County: The Places That Shape Us .
    [Show full text]
  • 2004-2011 Duchesne River Working Group Water Management Report, August 2013
    2004 – 2011 Water Management Report Duchesne River Working Group August 2013 Prepared by: Central Utah Water Conservancy District Table of Contents Purpose ...................................................................................................................................1 Location Maps and Photographs ............................................................................................1 High Flow Recommendations ................................................................................................2 Target Base Flow Recommendations ....................................................................................2 Water Supply .........................................................................................................................3 Flow Measurement.................................................................................................................5 Water Management ................................................................................................................6 Water Year Narratives ...........................................................................................................8 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................10 Recommendations ..................................................................................................................10 Literature Cited ......................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • West Fork Duchesne Fish Barrier Decision Memo
    Duchesne River Fish Barrier Project DECISION MEMO West Fork Duchesne River Fish Barrier Project USDA - FOREST SERVICE UINTA NATIONAL FOREST HEBER RANGER DISTRICT WASATCH COUNTY, UTAH INTRODUCTION The purpose of this project is to prevent upstream spread of whirling disease beyond the CUP VAT Diversion, which may act as a secondary barrier The West Fork of the Duchesne River above the Central Utah Project (CUP) VAT Diversion contains a pure Colorado River cutthroat trout (CRCT) population that is threatened by the discovery of Whirling Disease (WD) downstream at the confluence of the North and West Forks. This stream reach, classified as a blue ribbon fishery, also provided disease-certified CRCT which created the brood source in Sheep Creek Lake for the South Slope GMU. These fish are critical for future propagation efforts of CRCT, a Tier 1 Species, according to strategies within the CRCT Conservation Agreement. Moreover, should WD spread above the VAT Diversion, the CUP aqueduct system will rapidly spread the pathogen to the Currant Creek, Strawberry, Diamond Fork and Spanish Fork River drainages, threatening additional blue ribbon fisheries and cutthroat trout recovery efforts. DECISION It is my decision to implement the proposed action to construct a fish barrier in the West Fork of the Duchesne River to help prevent Whirling Disease from spreading beyond the VAT Diversion. The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) in coordination with the Heber Ranger District of the Uinta National Forest will install the fish barrier on the West Fork Duchesne River approximately 0.25 mile downstream of the Central Utah Project (CUP) VAT Diversion.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Paleozoic Rocks Exposed in the Duchesne River Area, Duchesne County, Utah
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR J. A. KRUG, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. WRATHER, Director \ CIRCULAR 16 LATE PALEOZOIC ROCKS EXPOSED IN THE DUCHESNE RIVER AREA, DUCHESNE COUNTY, UTAH By John W. Huddle and Franklin T. McCann WASHINGTON 1947 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR J. A. KRUG, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. WRATHER, Director CIRCULAR 16 LATE PALEOZOIC ROCKS EXPOSED IN THE DUCHESNE RIVER. AREA, DUCHESNE ·COUNTY, UTAH By John W. Huddle and Franklin T. McCann WASHINGTON 1947 . IATE PALEOZOIC ROCKS EXPOSED IN THE DUCHESNE RIVER AREA, DUCHESNE CO:tJNTY, UTAH. By John W. Huddle and Franklin T. McCann During 1945 two field parties of the U. S. Geological Survey investigated the stratigraphy and structure of the pre~Tertiary rocks on the south slope of the Uinta Mountains in northeastern Utah. The work was undertaken because of the increasing interest in the oil and gas possibilities of the Uinta Basin, which lies south of the Uinta Mountains. Geologic reports on these areas are in preparation but it seems advisable to present at this time a detailed section of the lata Paleozoic rocks in the Duchesne River area. The late Paleozoic rocks in the Duchesne River were/ first mappPd and described by Berkey (1905, pp. 517-530), and his work was followed by the reports of Emmons (1907, pp. 287-302), and Weeks (190')7, pp. 427-448), who recognized the same general sequence of rocks as Berkey described but disagreed regarding the thicknesses and correlations given by him. Detailed sections of the Permian and Carb~niferous formations in the Duchesne River area are inciuded in two recen~ articles by J.
    [Show full text]
  • Duchesne River Ranch
    Duchesne River Ranch Uintah County, Utah 457 Acres $879,000 3616 Elmwood Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84106 801-870-1801 [email protected] Welcome to the Duchesne River Ranch Featuring: 1.3 miles of private river frontage Pristine wildlife habitat Excellent hunting with “Any Bull” and Buck tags available “over the counter” 400 acre-feet of deeded water Existing culinary well 80 acres in alfalfa Income stream from existing oil leases Seller financing Farming Equipment Included -Case Backhoe -Massey Ferguson Tractor Intermountain Realty Group is proud to offer this beautiful gentleman’s ranch tucked away along the banks of the Duchesne River. Unencumbered by gaudy improvements, the Ranch has been carefully managed as a haven for the elk, moose, deer, turkeys, and waterfowl that reside here. In addition to beautiful scenery, unlimited outdoor recreation, and solitude, this appropriately-priced property is an attractive investment. That’s right, subsidize the cost of the property by raising hay on the 80 irrigated acres, or use the income from existing oil leases to make your dream a reality. LandRancher [email protected] 801-870-1801 Page 1 HISTORY Duchesne River Ranch is located in the central portion of the Uinta Basin, which extends sixty miles into western Colorado. The northern rim of the basin is formed by the Uinta Mountains, the western rim by the Wasatch Mountains, and the southern rim by the Roan and Book Cliffs. The basin is the geological remnant of prehistoric Uinta Lake. Prehistoric Indian sites suggest that the Uinta Basin was inhabited thousands of years ago by Archaic, and more recently, Fremont peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Duchesne County, Utah Centennial County History Series
    A HISTORY OF 'Duchesne County r>* '••'""•"•• l'j •:%*'•:•• John D. Barton UTAH CENTENNIAL COUNTY HISTORY SERIES A HISTORY OF (Duchesne County John D. Barton Duchesne County, in the Uinta Basin of northeastern Utah, was opened for home- steading in 1905, the last region in the state settled by Euro-Americans, and among the last settled areas in the continental United States. Its history is a microcosm of that of the West, featuring various groups of Native Americans, Spanish explorers, fur trappers, outlaws, cowboys, miners, and freighters. It was made part of the Uintah Ute Indian Reservation in 1861. Later, it was opened to homesteading, resulting in a land rush. County residents lived a pioneering lifestyle well into the twentieth century as they home- steaded the land and built communities. In more recent times, the county has faced booms and busts based on extractive economies, large government water projects, environ­ mental problems, and conflict between tradi­ tional and contemporary ideas about land use. In recent years, the Ute Tribe has claimed jurisdiction over the land, resulting in legal battles all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. Located on the south slope of the Uinta Mountains, Duchesne County contains many spectacular natural resources, including the highest point in the state—Kings Peak—and is loved by thousands of outdoor enthusiasts and county residents. ISBN: 0-913738-41-7 A HISTORY OF 'Duchesne County A HISTORY OF 'Duchesne County John D. Barton 1998 Utah State Historical Society Duchesne County Commission Copyright
    [Show full text]
  • Central Utah Projects Upalco, Uintah, and Ute Indian (Ultimate Phase) Units
    Central Utah Projects Upalco, Uintah, and Ute Indian (Ultimate Phase) Units Project Location................................................................................................................ 2 Historical Setting............................................................................................................... 3 Construction History ...................................................................................................... 15 Post Construction History.............................................................................................. 25 Settlement of Project Lands........................................................................................... 25 Uses of Project Water ..................................................................................................... 26 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 26 Notes................................................................................................................................. 27 Bibliography .................................................................................................................... 30 Index................................................................................................................................. 34 The Central Utah Project – Uintah, Upalco, and Ute Indian Units Historic Reclamation Projects Book Adam R. Eastman Page 1 The Central Utah Project (CUP) is the largest and most complicated
    [Show full text]
  • North Fork of the Duchesne River 33.6 Unique Rock Outcrop Associated with the West Fork of the Duchesne River
    Mileage - (only “key mileposts are shown on map) AS 0.0 Start at junction of US Highway 40 and State Road 87 in INT H U ESS HIG N DER the center of the community of Duchesne. Head north on State WIL Road 87 0.2 Turn left onto the “River Road.” MOON LAKE Route travels through an area occupied by Russian Olive Trees. UPPER STILLWATER DUCHESNE RESERVOIR River Tour 1.4 Notice the wetlands on either side of the road. These areas 41.7 are associated with the Duchesne River channel, and provide excellent habitat for wildlife, such as song birds and waterfowl. 39.6 Such wetland areas are extremely important for maintaining ² various wildlife populations. 0 2 4 8 2.2 Views of the distant High Uintas Wilderness open up to 35.5 Miles travelers at this milepost...the canyons and peaks of the Swift TO VERNAL Creek, Yellowstone, Moon Lake, and Rock Creek wilderness 32.5 areas can be seen. 29.1 3.2 Good view of the Duchesne River draining and river cor- ridor, defined on either side by moderately steep slopes. Geo- logic level of this portion of the river canyon is the Duchesne 24.4 River Formation. 22.8 Cultivated fields of alfalfa hay occupy the land adjacent to the BIG SAND ROOSEVELT LAKE river. Cottonwood, willow, maple, and other deciduous trees 18.3 TO VERNAL are found along the river banks. 15.7 9.2 5.6 Crossing of the Duchesne River 5.8 Crossing under the 345 kV (kilovolt) transmission line, 7.1 carrying electricity from the Bonanza Power Plant near Vernal ¤£40 FRUITLAND to the Mona Substation south of Provo, Utah.
    [Show full text]