Altmetrics Make Their Mark Alternative Measures Can Yield Useful Data on Achievement — but Must Be Used Cautiously

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Altmetrics Make Their Mark Alternative Measures Can Yield Useful Data on Achievement — but Must Be Used Cautiously CAREERS TURNING POINT US cancer researcher feels NATUREJOBS FACEBOOK Science-careers NATUREJOBS For the latest career squeezed by budget cuts p.493 advice and information go.nature.com/4lzxra listings and advice www.naturejobs.com IMAGEZOO/CORBIS RESEARCH IMPACT Altmetrics make their mark Alternative measures can yield useful data on achievement — but must be used cautiously. BY ROBERTA KWOK paper on his CV accompanied by the journal’s number of times a paper has been shared on impact factor and the article’s number of cita- social-media websites or saved using online teve Pettifer and his colleagues did not tions — in this case, about 80. But when he research tools. heavily promote their 2008 paper on digi- came up for promotion this year, he realized When Pettifer submitted his annotated tal library tools. So it came as a surprise that tracking citations was not going to tell CV for the first round of promotion review, Swhen, in August 2012, Pettifer got an e-mail the whole story about the paper’s influence. his mentor expressed confusion. He took a from the Public Library of Science (PLOS), Impact factor is a crude measure that applies look and said, “What the hell are these badges based in San Francisco, California. A PLOS only to the journal, not to specific articles, he doing in your CV?” recalls Pettifer. “But once representative told him that people had viewed says; citations take a long time to accumulate, I explained them, he said, ‘Well, give it a go.’” or downloaded the article (D. Hull et al. PLoS and people may not cite a paper even if it influ- Pettifer submitted his CV for the second Comput. Biol. 4, e1000204; 2008) more than ences their thinking. So he added the number round — and got his promotion. He does not 53,000 times. It was the most-accessed review of views to the CV entry. And he did not stop know for sure whether the metrics helped, but ever to be published in any of the seven PLOS there. he plans to use them on future grant applica- journals. The paper had come out just as biolo- Next to many of the papers listed, Pettifer tions. “I’m definitely a convert,” he says. gists’ interest in digital publishing was building added labels indicating scholarly and public and the number of tools was exploding, says engagement. The labels were generated by OUTSIDE THE BOX Pettifer, a computer scientist at the University ImpactStory in Carrboro, North Carolina, one ‘Altmetrics’, a term coined in 2010 by Impact- of Manchester, UK. “It hit the right note at the of several services that gauges research impact Story co-founder Jason Priem, refers to a range right time,” he says. using a combination of metrics — in this case, of measures of research impact that go beyond At one time, Pettifer would have listed the a wide range of data sources, including the citations. Several altmetrics services have 22 AUGUST 2013 | VOL 500 | NATURE | 491 © 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved CAREERS emerged in the past few years (see ‘Four a researcher’s work. ImpactStory then creates link to a particular paper; each article will have ways to score’). They produce reports that a profile showing how frequently each product multiple URLs, so conducting such a search gauge impact by taking into account not just has been viewed, saved, discussed, cited or rec- manually would be very time-consuming. academic citations, but also digital use and ommended online. The reports can even suggest potential sharing of data — which can include the num- Other services take a more article-centric collaborators or journals. For example, if an ber of times a paper has been tweeted, ‘liked’ approach. Altmetric in London allows users to informatics paper is mentioned a lot by biolo- on Facebook, covered by the media or blogs, access data on individual papers using a book- gists, the author might consider publishing downloaded, cited on Wikipedia or book- marklet — a browser bookmark that executes his or her next article in a biology journal to marked online. Some services also evaluate JavaScript commands. (Altmetric is funded increase exposure, says Heather Piwowar, research products such as software, data sets partly by Digital Science, a sister company to co-founder of ImpactStory. and slideshows by tracking the number of Nature Publishing Group.) Users install the people who have used or viewed the product bookmarklet in their Internet browsers; then, MEASURES OF CAUTION online (see Nature 500, 243–245; 2013). when they come across a paper that they are Despite the benefits, researchers and evalua- Altmetrics offer researchers a way to show- interested in, they click the bookmarklet button. tors must interpret altmetrics data cautiously. case the impact of A report pops up in the corner of the browser, Data sets might not be comprehensive: not all papers that have not providing altmetrics that include a score indi- services detect news stories that do not give yet gathered many cating how much online attention the paper has URLs for the study, for example. The popular- citations, and to received. The score takes into account the num- ity of social-media sites changes over time, so demonstrate engage- ber of people who have read or mentioned the it is unrealistic to expect a paper published in LATHAM JOHN T. ment with the public. article, as well as the relative importance of the 2008 to generate as many tweets as one pub- They can be accessed medium and the mentioner. Newspaper cover- lished in 2013. And some disciplines, such through journals or age is weighted more heavily than tweets, and as computational biology, are more active independent web- tweets by individuals more heavily than those than others on social media, so comparisons sites, and can track by journals promoting their content. between disciplines may be unfair. the impact of par- Many journals display some altmetrics on To get the most meaningful information, ticular data sets or their sites automatically; these might be gen- users should dig into the underlying data. papers, or evaluate “It hit the right erated in-house or provided by an external Although a paper’s Altmetric score can sug- the combined influ- note at the right service. Every article published by PLOS, for gest whether it is worth clicking through to the ence of publications time.” example, includes an online metrics tab show- more detailed report, “qualitative assessment and products pro- Steve Pettifer ing data such as views, downloads and social- is far more important than the number”, says duced by multiple media mentions. A feature called Article-Level Euan Adie, founder of Altmetric. researchers in a department. Metrics Reports lets users search for PLOS To help users to interpret the data, most But these services must be used wisely. They papers by criteria such as author or keyword, services put numbers in context. Impact- are not meant for strict quantitative compari- and generates a summary metrics report for the Story normalizes data by publication year and sons; nor do they always distinguish between set of results, including article usage by paper includes percentiles — it might, for example, positive and negative attention. And although age and maps of authors’ locations. Several note that a given paper has more readers on scientists can include altmetrics in job and grant journal publishers, including Nature Publishing the online reference manager Mendeley than applications and annual reports, they must Group in London and Cell Press in Cambridge, 97% of papers indexed that year. Altmetric select relevant data and clearly explain the con- Massachusetts, display data from Altmetric on shows results normalized by journal, which text to avoid provoking mistrust or confusion. their sites, and John Wiley & Sons in Hoboken, allows fairer comparison of papers in disci- Some altmetrics services generate profiles New Jersey, began a trial with the metrics firm in pline-specific publications. And in May, PLOS that summarize the impact of a researcher’s May. HighWire Press, an electronic-publishing began offering Relative Metrics, a service that products. ImpactStory allows scientists to platform at Stanford University in Palo Alto, lets users see how a paper compares to other import lists of items such as papers and soft- California, is collaborating with ImpactStory PLOS articles in the same subject area, using ware from existing user profiles at websites to add altmetrics to its journal websites. tools such as graphs of article views. such as Google Scholar, which automatically Altmetrics enable scientists to see ripples Including altmetrics in decisions on grants, tracks a researcher’s papers, or the online soft- generated by their research that might other­ hiring and tenure requires careful considera- ware-code repository GitHub. Scientists can wise go unnoticed. Individual researchers tion. Gerald Rubin, executive director of the also manually enter the digital object identifi- can try to track buzz on their own, but data- Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Janelia ers (DOIs) of their papers, or input their Open aggregation and updating services make it Farm Research Campus in Ashburn, Virginia, Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID), a much easier. These services also automate is sceptical of altmetrics that do not explicitly unique identifier that can be used to tag all of difficult tasks, such as finding all tweets that indicate quality, such as number of tweets. He FOUR WAYS TO SCORE A quartet of services offers free metrics reports that go beyond citations. ImpactStory Altmetric PLOS Article-Level Metrics Plum Analytics Products Papers, software, data sets and more Papers, data sets, some books Papers published by the Public Papers, books, patents and tracked Library of Science (PLOS) more What you get Profile page, metrics badges, application Bookmarklet, metrics badges, API Summary reports, WordPress Profile page (currently in programming interface (API; a means widget, API testing), API for software to access the altmetrics) Publishers Various, including eLife, Pensoft Include Nature Publishing Group, Cell PLOS Medwave (forthcoming Publishers, PeerJ Press, BioMed Central this year) Major Alfred P.
Recommended publications
  • Evidence for Excellence: Has the Signal Overtaken the Substance? an Analysis of Journal Articles Submitted to RAE2008
    Digital Research Reports Evidence for excellence: has the signal overtaken the substance? An analysis of journal articles submitted to RAE2008 Jonathan Adams & Karen A Gurney JUNE 2014 About the Authors Jonathan Adams joined Digital Science as Chief Scientist in October 2013. Previously he was the lead founder of Evidence Ltd (2000-2009) and Director of Re- search Evaluation for Thomson Reuters (2009-2013). Jonathan led the 2008 review of research evaluation in New Zealand and was a member of the Australian Research Council (ARC) indicators development group for its research excellence assessment (ERA). In 2004 he chaired the EC Evaluation Monitoring Committee for Framework Programme 6. In 2006 he chaired the Monitoring Group of the European Research Fund for Coal & Steel. In 2010 he was an Expert Advisor to the interim evaluation of the EU's 7th Framework Programme for Research (FP7). Karen Gurney was a co-founder of Evidence Ltd (2000-2009) and led the UK-based research evaluation arm of Thomson Reuters (2009-2013). She is now at Sheffield Hallam University. Karen has managed research evaluation projects for companies and research-funding agencies in Europe, North America and Asia-Pacific. She is an Associ- ate of the Royal College of Science and has a specialist background in biomedical sci- ences, having worked with Leukaemia Research Fund and the Paediatric Epidemiology Group at the University of Leeds. Karen has published extensively in science journals as well as research policy. About Digital Science Digital Science is a technology company serving the needs of scientific research. We offer a range of scientific technology and content solutions that help make sci- entific research more efficient.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Altmetric Scores of Open Access Articles and of Articles
    Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft Berliner Handreichungen zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft Heft 444 Altmetrics and Open Access Comparison of Altmetric Scores of open and closed access articles published by German research institutions in the field of natural sciences von Lea Satzinger Altmetrics and Open Access Comparison of Altmetric Scores of open and closed access articles published by German research institutions in the field of natural sciences von Lea Satzinger Berliner Handreichungen zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft Begründet von Peter Zahn Herausgegeben von Vivien Petras Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Heft 444 Satzinger, Lea Altmetrics and Open Access : Comparison of Altmetric Scores of open and closed access articles published by German research institutions in the field of natural sci- ences / von Lea Satzinger. - Berlin : Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswis- senschaft der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 2019. – 81 S. : 15 Abb. - (Berliner Handreichungen zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft ; 444) ISSN 14 38-76 62 Abstract Altmetrics, in contrast to traditional metrics, measure the societal impact research outputs have on the public in general, using social media platforms as their primary data sources. In this study, differences in Altmetric Scores between open and closed access articles of German research institutions in the field of natural sciences have been analyzed. For this investigation data from the years 2013 to 2017 was gathered from Web of Science, Altmetric.com and Unpaywall. Results indicated that arti- cles published in open access gain higher Altmetric Attention Scores compared to articles behind subscription paywalls, although the difference was statistically not significant. Research outputs published in gold open access had the highest scores, followed by articles in green and then hybrid open access.
    [Show full text]
  • August 1, 2019 Mr. John Sargent, Chief Executive Officer Macmillan Publishers 120 Broadway Street New York, NY 10271
    50 E. Huron, Chicago, IL 60611 August 1, 2019 Mr. John Sargent, Chief Executive Officer Macmillan Publishers 120 Broadway Street New York, NY 10271 Dear Mr. Sargent, On behalf of the 9,000 members of the Public Library Association (PLA), our nation’s largest association for public library professionals, we are writing to object to and ask Macmillan Publishers to reconsider its plan to embargo new eBook titles for U.S. public libraries starting November 1. Under this new model, we understand a public library may purchase only a single copy of each new title in eBook format upon release, after which Macmillan will impose an eight-week embargo on additional eBook sales of that title. To public libraries and the millions of people who rely on them every day, Macmillan’s new policy is patently unacceptable. The central mission of libraries is to ensure equitable access to information for all people, regardless of format. Macmillan’s new eBook lending policy will limit access to new titles by the readers who depend most on libraries. In a recent interview, you likened this embargo to delaying release of paperback titles to maximize hardcover sales, but in that case public libraries are able to purchase and lend the books at the same time our readers are seeking them. Access to eBooks through public libraries should not be denied or delayed. PLA and its parent organization the American Library Association, will explore all possible avenues to ensure that libraries can do our jobs of providing access to information for all, without arbitrary limitations that undermine libraries’ ability to serve our communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall Conference
    NAIBA Fall Conference October 6 - October 8, 2018 Baltimore, MD CONTENTS NAIBA Board of Directors 1 NOTES Letters from NAIBA’s Presidents 2 REGISTRATION HOURS Benefits of NAIBA Membership 4 Schedule At A Glance 6 Constellation Foyer Detailed Conference Schedule 8 Saturday, October 6, Noon – 7:00pm Sunday, October 7, 7:30am – 7:00pm Exhibition Hall Map 23 Monday, October 8, 7:30am – 1:00pm Conference Exhibitors 24 Thank You to All Our Sponsors 34 Were You There? 37 EXHIBIT HALL HOURS Publishers Marketplace Sunday, October 7, 2:00pm – 6:00pm ON BEING PHOTOGRAPHED Participating in the NAIBA Fall Conference and entering any of its events indicates your agreement to be filmed or photographed for NAIBA’s purposes. NO CARTS /naiba During show hours, no hand carts or other similar wheeled naibabooksellers devices are allowed on the exhibit floor. @NAIBAbook #naiba CAN WE TALK? The NAIBA Board Members are happy to stop and discuss retail and association business with you. Board members will be wearing ribbons on their badges to help you spot them. Your input is vital to NAIBA’s continued growth and purpose. NAIBA BOARD OF DIRECTORS Todd Dickinson Trish Brown Karen Torres (Outgoing President) One More Page Hachette Book Group Aaron’s Books 2200 N. Westmoreland Street 1290 6th Ave. 35 East Main Street Arlington, VA 22213 New York, NY 10104 Lititz, PA 17543 Ph: 703-861-8326 212-364-1556 Ph: 717-627-1990 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Jenny Clines Stephanie Valdez Bill Reilly (Incoming Board member) (Outgoing Board member) (Incoming President) Politics & Prose 143 Seventh Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Don Weisberg Appointed President of Macmillan Publishers U.S
    DON WEISBERG APPOINTED PRESIDENT OF MACMILLAN PUBLISHERS U.S. Macmillan announces today the appointment of Don Weisberg as President of Macmillan Publishers US. In this role, Weisberg will manage the U.S. trade publishing houses of Macmillan, the audio and podcast businesses, and the trade sales organization. He will report to Macmillan CEO John Sargent. The appointment will have no effect on the reporting responsibilities of Andrew Weber, Macmillan's COO, or Ken Michaels, the CEO of Macmillan Learning, who continue to report to Sargent. Weisberg will join Macmillan at the beginning of January 2016. Sargent stated, "Macmillan Publishers has grown significantly over the past years, and the publishing business continues to increase in complexity. Our business in the United States has expanded greatly even as we have become more integrated globally. As my role has changed, it is clear that the U.S. business needs a dedicated senior executive to lead our publishing efforts. I am delighted to welcome Don Weisberg to Macmillan. Don has a remarkable track record of success across many aspects of the publishing business, and his unique combination of skills and management style are a perfect fit for our organization. Don is smart and experienced. He has proven to be great leader with a true passion for books and the book business. He will bring tremendous focus and energy to our publishing, to the great benefit of our company and our authors." Weisberg said, "As difficult as it will be to leave my team and authors at Penguin Young Readers, I am greatly looking forward to working with the group at Macmillan that I have always admired from afar.
    [Show full text]
  • THE OA EFFECT: HOW DOES OPEN ACCESS AFFECT the USAGE of SCHOLARLY BOOKS? White Paper
    springernature.com Illustration inspired by the work of Jean-Claude Bradley Open Research THE OA EFFECT: HOW DOES OPEN ACCESS AFFECT THE USAGE OF SCHOLARLY BOOKS? White paper Open Research: Journals, books, data and tools from: 2 The OA effect: How does open access affect the usage of scholarly books? springernature.com Contents Authors Foreword . 3 Christina Emery, Mithu Lucraft, Executive summary . 4 Agata Morka, Ros Pyne Introduction . 5 November 2017 Part 1: Quantitative findings . 6 Summary . 6 Downloads . 7 Citations and mentions . 11 Part 2: Qualitative findings . 13 Summary . 13 Reasons for publishing open access . 14 Experience of publishing open access . 15 The future of open access . 16 Discussion . 18 Conclusion and recommendations . 20 Acknowledgements . 22 Contacts . 23 About Springer Nature and OA books . 24 Appendices . 26 Appendix 1: Definitions and limitations . 26 Appendix 2: Methodology . 27 Appendix 3: Top 10 downloaded books . 29 Appendix 4: Interviewed authors and funders . 30 Appendix 5: Author questionnaire . 32 Appendix 6: Funder questionnaire . 33 Appendix 7: References . 34 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0) The OA effect: How does open access affect the usage of scholarly books? springernature.com 3 Foreword Springer Nature was created in 2015, but from our earliest days as Springer, Palgrave Macmillan and Nature, we have been publishing monographs and long-form research for some 175 years. The changing environment for book publishing has created both opportunities and challenges for researchers and their funders, for publishers, and for the wider community of readers and educators. As a publisher, we have championed new models of scholarship, introducing ebooks in 2006, and our first open access (OA) book in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Tor Teen Acquires Ya Contemporary Fantasy Trilogy from Debut Black Author, Terry J
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contact: Saraciea Fennell, Publicity Manager, Tor Teen [email protected] TOR TEEN ACQUIRES YA CONTEMPORARY FANTASY TRILOGY FROM DEBUT BLACK AUTHOR, TERRY J. BENTON IN MID-SIX FIGURE DEAL NEW YORK, NY (December 3, 2020)—Tor Teen, the publisher of A Song Below Water and The Witchlands series, has acquired, in a major deal, Blood Debts, a YA contemporary fantasy trilogy by Terry J. Benton, pitched as “Dynasty with magic” set to publish in Winter 2023. The book follows two Black twins, sixteen year-old Clem and Cristina, who must put aside their differences and reunite their fractured family in order to take back the New Orleans magic council their family used to rule—all while solving a decades-old murder that sparked the rising tensions between the city’s magical and non-magical communities, before it leads to an all-out war. Tor Teen Senior Editor Ali Fisher said, “Reading Blood Debts was like binge-watching my new favorite show. I gasped, I laughed, I completely fell in love. Benton is a powerhouse new voice in YA fantasy and the relationship between race, magic, and power is fresh and observant. I was on the edge of my seat to see who'd claim the throne!” Benton's agent, Patrice Caldwell, praises the hole the book fills in the market: “I can’t think of the last YA contemporary fantasy I’ve read written by a gay, Black man, centering a gay, Black boy. I can’t wait for this book to be out in the world!” Patrice Caldwell at New Leaf Literary & Media negotiated the three book deal for North American rights.
    [Show full text]
  • SCIENCE and the MEDIA AMERICAN ACADEMY of ARTS & SCIENCES Science and the Media
    SCIENCE AND THE MEDIA AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES SCIENCE AND THE MEDIA AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS Science and the Media Edited by Donald Kennedy and Geneva Overholser AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES Science and the Media Please direct inquiries to: American Academy of Arts and Sciences 136 Irving Street Cambridge, MA 02138-1996 Telephone: 617-576-5000 Fax: 617-576-5050 Email: [email protected] Web: www.amacad.org Science and the Media Edited by Donald Kennedy and Geneva Overholser © 2010 by the American Academy of Arts and Sciences All rights reserved. ISBN#: 0-87724-087-6 The American Academy of Arts and Sciences is grateful to the Annenberg Foundation Trust at Sunnylands for supporting The Media in Society project. The statements made and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the authors and are not necessarily those of the Annenberg Foundation Trust at Sunnylands or the Officers and Fellows of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Contents vi Acknowledgments vii Preface 1 Chapter 1 Science and the Media Donald Kennedy 10 Chapter 2 In Your Own Voice Alan Alda 13 Chapter 3 Covering Controversial Science: Improving Reporting on Science and Public Policy Cristine Russell 44 Chapter 4 Civic Scientific Literacy: The Role of the Media in the Electronic Era Jon D. Miller 64 Chapter 5 Managing the Trust Portfolio: Science Public Relations and Social Responsibility Rick E. Borchelt, Lynne T. Friedmann, and Earle Holland 71 Chapter 6 Response to Borchelt, Friedmann, and Holland on Managing the Trust Portfolio: Science Public Relations and Social Responsibility Robert Bazell 74 Chapter 7 The Scientist as Citizen Cornelia Dean 80 Chapter 8 Revitalizing Science Journalism for a Digital Age Alfred Hermida 88 Chapter 9 Responsible Reporting in a Technological Democracy William A.
    [Show full text]
  • SUBMISSION from SPRINGER NATURE Making Plan S Successful
    PLAN S IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE: SUBMISSION FROM SPRINGER NATURE Springer Nature welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback to the cOAlition S Implementation Guidance and contribute to the discussion on how the transition to Open Access (OA) can be accelerated. Our submission below focuses mainly on the second question posed in the consultation: Are there other mechanisms or requirements funders should consider to foster full and immediate Open Access of research outputs? Making Plan S successful: a commitment to open access Springer Nature is dedicated to accelerating the adoption of Open Access (OA) publishing and Open Research techniques. As the world’s largest OA publisher we are a committed partner for cOAlition S funders in achieving this goal which is also the primary focus of Plan S. Our recommendations below are therefore presented with the aim of achieving this goal. As a first mover, we know the (multiple) challenges that need to be overcome: funding flows that need to change, a lack of cooperation in funder policies, a lack of global coordination, the need for a cultural change in researcher assessment and metrics in research, academic disciplines that lack OA resources, geographic differences in levels of research output making global “Publish and Read” deals difficult and, critically, an author community that does not yet view publishing OA as a priority. While this uncertainty remains, we need the benefits of OA to be better described and promoted as well as support for the ways that enable us and other publishers to cope with the rapidly increasing demand. We therefore propose cOAlition S adopt the following six recommendations which we believe are necessary to deliver Plan S’s primary goal of accelerating the take-up of OA globally while minimising costs to funders and other stakeholders: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Music Training Aids Speech Processing
    RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS THIS WEEK MARINE ECOLOGY these differences, suggesting that these compounds could be Blue whales mediating the effects on Popular articles SOCIAL SELECTION on social media bounce back gut flora and the immune system. A population of blue whales Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 252ra120 The language of deception has reached pre-whaling levels (2014) and is no longer endangered. A PLoS ONE paper on language patterns in fraudulent papers Cole Monnahan at the NEUROSCIENCE has sparked social-media speculation about new ways to spot University of Washington dishonest work. Researchers at Cornell University in Ithaca, in Seattle and his colleagues Music training aids New York, took advantage of a singular resource to study the modelled a population of speech processing linguistics of fraud: the collected works of Diederik Stapel, blue whales (Balaenoptera a Dutch social psychologist who confessed to faking data in musculus) in the eastern North The more music training many of his papers. The Cornell team analysed papers that had Pacific along with the number children receive, the better been deemed fraudulent by three investigative committees, of ships and their collisions their brains become at and compared them with his genuine publications. They with the mammals between distinguishing between similar found that the falsified papers had a linguistic signature. 1905 and 2050. They found speech sounds. Among other things, they tended to have fewer qualifying that whale numbers in this Nina Kraus at Northwestern words (such as ‘possibly’) and more amplifying words such as region were at their lowest in University in Evanston, ‘extremely’. “Lucky he had enough false papers for analysis!” 1931 and have since increased Illinois, and her colleagues tweeted Grace Lindsay, a neuroscience graduate student at to about 2,200 — nearly the studied children aged six to Columbia University in New York City.
    [Show full text]
  • Validity of Altmetrics Data for Measuring Societal Impact
    Accepted for publication in the Journal of Informetrics Validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact: A study using data from Altmetric and F1000Prime Lutz Bornmann Division for Science and Innovation Studies Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society Hofgartenstr. 8, 80539 Munich, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Can altmetric data be validly used for the measurement of societal impact? The current study seeks to answer this question with a comprehensive dataset (about 100,000 records) from very disparate sources (F1000, Altmetric, and an in-house database based on Web of Science). In the F1000 peer review system, experts attach particular tags to scientific papers which indicate whether a paper could be of interest for science or rather for other segments of society. The results show that papers with the tag “good for teaching” do achieve higher altmetric counts than papers without this tag – if the quality of the papers is controlled. At the same time, a higher citation count is shown especially by papers with a tag that is specifically scientifically oriented (“new finding”). The findings indicate that papers tailored for a readership outside the area of research should lead to societal impact. If altmetric data is to be used for the measurement of societal impact, the question arises of its normalization. In bibliometrics, citations are normalized for the papers’ subject area and publication year. This study has taken a second analytic step involving a possible normalization of altmetric data. As the results show there are particular scientific topics which are of especial interest for a wide audience.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book and Printed Culture of Mathematics in England and Canada, 1830-1930
    Paper Index of the Mind: The Book and Printed Culture of Mathematics in England and Canada, 1830-1930 by Sylvia M. Nickerson A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology University of Toronto © Copyright by Sylvia M. Nickerson 2014 Paper Index of the Mind: The Book and Printed Culture of Mathematics in England and Canada, 1830-1930 Sylvia M. Nickerson Doctor of Philosophy Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology University of Toronto 2014 Abstract This thesis demonstrates how the book industry shaped knowledge formation by mediating the selection, expression, marketing, distribution and commercialization of mathematical knowledge. It examines how the medium of print and the practices of book production affected the development of mathematical culture in England and Canada during the nineteenth and early twentieth century. Chapter one introduces the field of book history, and discusses how questions and methods arising from this inquiry might be applied to the history of mathematics. Chapter two looks at how nineteenth century printing technologies were used to reproduce mathematics. Mathematical expressions were more difficult and expensive to produce using moveable type than other forms of content; engraved diagrams required close collaboration between author, publisher and engraver. Chapter three examines how editorial decision-making differed at book publishers compared to mathematical journals and general science journals. Each medium followed different editorial processes and applied distinct criteria in decision-making about what to publish. ii Daniel MacAlister, Macmillan and Company’s reader of science, reviewed mathematical manuscripts submitted to the company and influenced which ones would be published as books.
    [Show full text]