DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix a Community Profile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix a Community Profile Housing Element Appendix A Community Profile To understand San Luis Obispo’s housing needs, a demographic profile of the community is essential. Statistical information provided in this appendix forms the basis for the goals, policies and programs in Chapter 3, and for establishing quantified housing objectives in Chapter 4, as required by State law. Social, economic and housing characteristics are analyzed to determine how these factors affect housing needs, costs and availability. Main sources of statistical data in this community profile include the 2000 and 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, California Department of Finance (DOF), and the 2012 Central Coast Economic Forecast prepared by Beacon Economics. 1. Population Trends and Characteristics San Luis Obispo is one of seven cities located within San Luis Obispo County, and is the largest in terms of population. As shown in Table A-1, the City's estimated population in 2013 was 45,541 (California Department of Finance, January 1, 2013). The population of the County is estimated to be 272,177. Thus, approximately 17 percent of County residents lived in the City of San Luis Obispo in 2013. Table A-1 Population Growth, 2005-2013 City of San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo County California Rate of Rate of Rate of Population Change Population Change Population Change (%) (%) (%) 2005 44,662 - 261,558 - 35,278,768 - 2006 44,522 -0.31 263,727 0.83 36,457,549 3.34 2007 44,389 -0.30 265,786 0.78 36,553,215 0.26 2008 44,521 0.30 268,290 0.94 36,756,666 0.56 2009 44,750 0.51 270,429 0.80 36,961,664 0.56 2010 45,119 0.82 269,637 -0.29 37,253,956 0.79 2011 45,269 0.33 271,969 0.86 37,691,912 1.18 2012 45,312 0.10 271,502 -0.17 37,668,804 -0.06 2013 45,541 0.51 272,177 0.25 37,966,471 0.79 Source: U.S. Census 2010, DOF 2013 The City’s long-term population growth rate has reflected slow, steady growth of one percent or less per year. From 2005-2013, the City’s population, decreased slightly for the next two years starting from 2005, and increase slightly for the next six years. During this period, annual population change never exceeded one percent, and only three times did it change more than half a percent. Comparatively over the same period, the population of the County grew at rates of - 0.29 to 0.94 percent, and the State’s population grew annually at rates ranging from -0.06 to 3.34 percent. Page A-1 Chapter 3 City of San Luis Obispo Housing Element, January 2015 Table A-2 shows the average annual growth rate in population for the City, County, and State between 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2013. The relatively recent slow growth is apparent between 2010 and 2013, when the City population increased only 0.2 percent. The average annual growth rate for the County was the same at 0.2 percent per year and the State’s growth rate was 2.5 times higher for the same period. Between 2010 and 2013, City, County and State saw their average annual growth rates drop slightly compared to 2000 to 2010. Table A-2 Average Annual Population Growth, 1990-2013 San Luis Obispo City, County, and State of California City County State Average Average Average Annual Annual Annual Population Population Population Growth Growth Growth Rate (%) Rate (%) Rate (%) 1990 41,958 - 217,162 - 29,760,021 - 2000 44,179 0.5 246,681 1.4 33,871,648 1.4 2010 45,119 0.2 269,637 0.9 37,253,956 1.0 2013 45,541 0.2 272,177 0.2 37,966,471 0.5 Source: U.S. Census, 1990, 2000, 2010; California Department of Finance, 2013 The California Department of Finance predicts that between 2005 and 2030, the State’s population will grow by almost 11.5 million to slightly greater than 48 million residents. This is a projected annual growth rate of 1.09 percent. As part of its regional planning functions, the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) develops and publishes regional population, employment, and housing forecasts for the County and its communities. Table A-3 shows SLOCOG growth projections for the City and County prepared by Economics Research Associates, and Department of Finance projections for the State. Table A-3 San Luis Obispo Population Projections, 2015-2030 Year City County State 2015 44,668 275,590 38,801,063 2020 45,969 286,940 40,643,643 2025 46,704 296,851 42,451,760 2030 47,622 309,288 44,279,354 Annual Growth Rate 0.40% 0.72% 1.0% Source: Regional Growth Forecast for San Luis Obispo Council of Governments, 2011; California Department of Finance, 2010 SLOCOG projections for the County show an annual growth rate of 0.72 percent. This annual growth rate is their middle-range projection. SLOCOG low and high-range projections forecast County annual growth rates of 0.64 percent and 0.79 percent respectively. For the City, SLOCOG projects a continuation of the relatively slow growth rates experienced between 2000 and 2010, with a 0.40 percent annual growth rate to 2030. Page A-2 Housing Element The General Plan Land Use Element (LUE) includes policies to accommodate an eventual City population of 57,200. At a 0.5 percent growth rate, the City's anticipated residential capacity would be reached by the year 2057. a) Age Composition San Luis Obispo’s age profile is shown in Table A-4 and graphically in the form of a population pyramid in Figure A-1. When compared with the County and State, San Luis Obispo has significantly lower percentages of children, teens and adults in the primary childbearing years of 25-44. The City however has a relatively high proportion of senior citizens. While smaller than the County, there are 0.6 percent more seniors age 65 years or older in the City than in the State. Due to the concentration of students attending Cuesta College and California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, young adults age 18-24 are by far the largest age group in the City. The City’s component of residents age 18-24 is orders of magnitude greater than the County and State. With 35 percent of residents being age 18-24, the City has nearly a 2.5 times greater share of these young adults than the County, and nearly 3.4 times greater share than the State. As discussed in Appendix B, this demographic trend has important implications for the San Luis Obispo area housing market in terms of housing type, tenure and demand. Table A-4 Age Distribution, 2010 San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo California Age County Population Percent Population Percent Population Percent Under 5 1,508 3% 13,343 5% 2,531,333 7% 5-17 4,014 9% 37498 14% 6,763,707 18% 18-24 15,670 35% 39,545 15% 3,922,951 11% 25-44 9,630 21% 61,860 23% 10,500,587 28% 45-64 8,866 20% 76,369 28% 9,288,864 25% 65 + 5,431 12% 41,022 15% 4,246,514 11% Source: U.S. Census, 2010 Page A-3 Chapter 3 City of San Luis Obispo Housing Element, January 2015 Figure A-1 San Luis Obispo Population Pyramid, 2010 80-84 70-74 60-64 50-54 40-44 Age Group 30-34 Male 20-24 Female 10-14 Under 5 7500 6000 4500 3000 1500 0 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 Population Source: U.S. Census, 2010 b) Race and Ethnicity As shown in Table A-5, San Luis Obispo City and County are less diverse racially and ethnically than the State as a whole. In 2010, more than three quarters of the residents in the City and County were of white and non-Hispanic origin (note: By census definitions, Hispanic or non- Hispanic origin is an ethnic characteristic independent of race). However, the racial and ethnic compositions of both the City and the County are changing. Between 2000 and 2010, the White and non-Hispanic population components in the City dropped 3 percent and 4 percent in the County during this period. By 2010, the Hispanic population of any race was the second largest in the City and County. Asian and Pacific/Islanders were the third largest population, followed by residents of two or more races. Page A-4 Housing Element Table A-5 Racial and Ethnic Composition as a Percentage of Total Population, 1990-2010 City County State Ethnicity 1990 2000 2010 1990 2000 2010 1990 2000 2010 White 88.6 78.7 75.8 89.3 76.1 71.1 65.6 46.7 40.1 Black/African- 1.9 1.3 1.0 2.2 1.9 1.9 8.1 6.4 5.8 American American 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.4 Indian/Alaska Native Asian or Pacific 5.2 5.3 5.2 2.9 2.7 3.1 10.4 11.1 13.1 Islander Other 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 Two or More -- 2.4 2.0 -- 2.2 2.3 -- 2.7 2.6 Hispanic or Latino of 3.7 11.7 14.7 4.6 16.3 20.8 15.0 32.4 37.6 Any Race Source: U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Formerly Single Room Occupancy
    ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Marcia L. White Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received: 1· 1CJ. · 1-D Date sent to Council: 1. 2,, l£:l . 10 TO: Salt Lake City Council Chris Wharton, Chair SUBJECT: Revised Transmittal re: Petition PLNPCM2018-00066 - Shared Housing Zoning ------+e-x-t-A-11:i:fillEi-n.1ents--E-feHRe1:.iy-t-i-t-leEl---&i-ng-le--R00rn-Geeu13ane-y- E-8-RGj-'I=e*t'-Amendments-J1-------------'- STAFF CONTACT: Ashley Ogden, RDA Project Manager (formerly Principal Planner) (80 I) 535-7207, ashley.ogden@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached ordinance, which has been revised in response to feedback received during the City Council public hearing held on April 23, 2019, a meeting with local housing advocates held on Octa ber 22, 2019, and direction received from the Council during the November 19, 2019, work session. BUDGET IMP ACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This is a follow up briefing memo to the existing transmittal package for this proposal and includes the following updated infonnation: On March 19, 2019, Planning Division Staff briefed the City Council on a Mayor-initiated proposal to amend sections of the Zoning Ordinance to better define Single Room Occupancy (SRO) housing and determine appropriate locations within the City for the use. Proposed amendments included changing the existing definition of SRO Dwelling, expanding the number of zoning districts that pennit SR Os, and creating qualifying provisions for the use. The Council held a public hearing on April 23, 2019, where numerous residents with differing views provided comment: some expressed concerns with the potential negative impacts of SRO SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.S LC .GOV P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Single-Room Occupancy Uses
    City Council Report City Council Meeting: March 26, 2019 Agenda Item: 7.A To: Mayor and City Council From: David Martin, Director, City Planning Subject: Introduction and Adoption of an Urgency Interim Zoning Ordinance Regarding Single-Room Occupancy Uses Recommended Action Staff recommends Council introduce and adopt an urgency interim zoning ordinance to prohibit Single-Room Occupancy (SRO) uses citywide on an interim basis in order to prevent the proliferation and over-concentration of SRO uses that are not 100% Affordable Housing Projects or certain specialized housing uses such as emergency shelters, transitional housing, and supportive housing. This urgency interim zoning ordinance would allow for study of revised development standards, land use regulations, use classifications, and additional requirements related to physical design or amenity plans, for SRO uses in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare. Executive Summary Over the years, City staff, decisionmakers, and community members have had numerous discussions regarding housing development in the City and how to create effective housing policies, programs, and regulatory tools to address the need for more development of a variety of types and sizes of housing options. In particular, a need has been identified for development of new affordable housing and supportive housing, and market-rate multi-family projects near transit, in order to offer attractive and feasible opportunities for a range of individuals and families to live in Santa Monica. The Downtown Community Plan was adopted by Council on July 25, 2017. Framed as a “housing first” approach, it envisioned a robust mix of housing types serving a wide range of household sizes and income levels.
    [Show full text]
  • SRO Tenants: Know Your Rights
    SRO Tenants: Know Your Rights WHAT IS A SINGLE ROOM OCCUPANCY BUILDING? A single-room-occupancy (SRO) building is usually a hotel or rooming house with rooms that do not have both a kitchen and a bathroom within the room. MOST SRO HOTELS ARE RENT-STABILIZED • Rent increases are regulated by law • Services (maid service, cleaning) may not be reduced NEW RESIDENTS CAN BECOME PERMANENT, RENT-STABILIZED TENANTS New residents can become permanent tenants protected by the Rent Stabilization Law by living in the hotel for 6 months or more OR by asking for a lease in writing. You do NOT have to get an actual lease to become a Permanent Tenant -- you only have to ask for one. Permanent Tenants or anyone who has lived there more than 30 days in a row CANNOT be evicted without a Court order and warrant. WHAT NEW RESIDENTS SHOULD KNOW • You do NOT have to leave the hotel after 21 days. • You will be protected by the Rent Stabilization Law IF you ask for a lease for 6 months or more. • You may ask for a lease at any time (even after living at the hotel for only 1 day). • MFY Legal Services has easy-to-use forms and can help you ask for a lease if you have not already done so. • Once you have lived in the hotel for 30 days in a row or have asked for a lease, you CANNOT be evicted without a Court order and warrant. WHAT PERMANENT TENANTS SHOULD KNOW • Permanent tenants have a right to stay in their rooms at the rent- stabilized rate without being charged more than the legal rent.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 NYCHVS Glossary
    2014 NYCHVS Glossary 2014 New York City Housing and Vacancy Survey Glossary The following definitions were prepared by the US Census Bureau to describe characteristics of individuals, households, housing units, and neighborhoods that are available from the 2014 New York City Housing and Vacancy Survey. Accessibility. See Wheelchair Accessibility. Additional Heating Required. Additional heating refers to households that reported using additional sources of heat to supplement their regular system, because the regular system, though functioning, did not provide enough heat during the winter prior to the time of interview. Additional sources of heat, such as kitchen stoves, fireplaces, or portable heaters, may have been used only in the mornings or on extra cold days. Electric blankets, heating pads, or hot water bottles are not considered additional sources of heat. Age. Age classification is based on the age reported as of that person's last birthday. Children under 1 year of age are classified as 1 year old. Persons age 99 and over are noted as 99 years old. Air Conditioning. This item refers to whether or not an apartment (house) has functioning central or window air conditioning. If both central and window air conditioning are present, central air conditioning takes priority. Asking Rent. See Monthly Asking Rent. Average Hours Worked in 2013. This item refers to the number of hours per week in 2013 typically spent at work. Hours spent at work include any kind of leave for which the subject is paid as usual. Bedrooms. The number of bedrooms in the housing unit is the count of rooms used mainly for sleeping, even if also used for other purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report } 2006
    } Annual Report } 2006 Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation Our Offices: Main Office: Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation Our 15 South Fifth Street, suite 710 Minneapolis MN 55402 Phone: 612-339-0601 Fax: 612-339-0608 www.gmhchousing.org Mission: to preserve, improve 909Northeast Main Street Northeast Minneapolis MN 55413 and increase Phone: 612-378-7985 Fax: 612-378-7986 www.housingresourcecenter.org affordable housing 2140Northwest 44th Avenue North for low and moderate Minneapolis MN 55412 Phone: 612-588-3033 Fax: 612-588-3028 income individuals www.housingresourcecenter.org and families, as well 3749Southside Cedar Avenue South Minneapolis MN 55407 Phone: 612-722-7141 as assist communities Fax: 612-722-6367 www.housingresourcecenter.org with housing 1170NorthMetro Lepak Court Shoreview MN 55126 revitalization. Phone: 651-486-7401 Fax: 651-486-7424 www.housingresourcecenter.org 627Saint Selby AvenuePaul Saint Paul MN 55104 Phone: 651-228-1077 Fax: 651-228-1083 www.housingresourcecenter.org Cover Photos: Top photo- Groundbreaking of Central Community Housing Trust’s ‘Clover Field Marketplace’ will provide 115 apartments and 9,000 sq. ft. of commercial space in Chaska, MN. GMHC provided $350,000 in predevelopment loans for this project. Center Photo- GMHC-built single family homes. Bottom Photo-Community Housing Development Corporation’s ‘Haralson Apartments’ in Apple Valley, MN provides 40 single-room occupancy units for single adults with incomes in the $15,000 and below range. GMHC provided $190,000 in predevelopment loans for this project. Few people in Minneapolis In Loving Memory of Our could point in Founder and Friend nearly every direction and CharlesDecember R. 18, Krusell 2006 say they had a President, Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation, 1970-1991 Chuck pioneered the employment of African American residents in Minneapolis hand in the city government and development the city’s first Affirmative Action program.
    [Show full text]
  • Rooms for the Misbegotten: Social Design and Social Deviance
    The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare Volume 21 Issue 4 December Article 7 December 1994 Rooms for the Misbegotten: Social Design and Social Deviance Bruce A. Arrigo Rowan College, New Jersey Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw Part of the Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons, and the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation Arrigo, Bruce A. (1994) "Rooms for the Misbegotten: Social Design and Social Deviance," The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare: Vol. 21 : Iss. 4 , Article 7. Available at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol21/iss4/7 This Article is brought to you by the Western Michigan University School of Social Work. For more information, please contact wmu-scholarworks@wmich.edu. Rooms for the Misbegotten: Social Design and Social Deviance BRUCE A. ARRIGO Rowan College of New Jersey Department of Law and Justice Studies Housing strategies designed to create a sense of community for our nation's at-risk and poverty-stricken citizens continue to be a source of debate. One major issue is the degree to which criminal behavior exists within these environments. In this article, the results from a seven year study of one single room occupancy (SRO) facility in Pittsburgh, Penn- sylvania are described. Analysis of two models used for intervening with the vulnerable tenant population of the SRO suggest that a "strength- focused" strategy rather than a "need- focused" approach may be more effective in reducing crime and may contribute to the establishment of a viable resident community. Introduction Two issues are raised in this case study report. First, the social and organizational implications of two client-centered, empowerment models and the usefulness of these models for creating a sense of community in single room occupancy (SRO) environments are presented.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Mandatory Design Standards for Multifamily Housing Part A
    MFA 2020 Mandatory Design Standards for Multifamily Housing Part A The following Design Standards, including the MFA 2020 Submission Instructions for Preliminary Architectural Documentation for Multifamily Housing Applications, contained herein as Part B, represent the minimum requirements for New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority (MFA) financed rental housing and are herewith incorporated by reference into MFA’s 2020 Qualified Allocation Plan (QAP). Capitalized terms are defined either herein or in the QAP. MFA values excellence in design because well designed housing meets the needs of tenants, attracts market tenants and promotes community acceptance of housing financed by MFA. All Projects shall meet or exceed each of these standards, as well as the minimum requirements of all applicable building codes (hereinafter referred to as “Code”), regulations, and local zoning ordinances. In addition, Projects shall meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Fair Housing Act (FHA) requirements as applicable. Depending on the funding sources and other partners’ requirements, the Project may also be subject to Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS) requirements. Projects receiving HOME funding must meet the property standards of 24 CFR 92.251. Projects receiving National Housing Trust Funds must meet the property standards of 24 CFR 93.301 (f) (1) and (2).The development team is responsible to know and meet all accessibility requirements for their Project. MFA will not be reviewing submissions with the intent to identify compliance with these various laws, codes, and ordinances governing the design of the projects. Should we find a discrepancy in a design that does not meet a law, code, or ordinance, we will, as a courtesy, inform the designer of our findings.
    [Show full text]
  • Stoughton Affordable Housing Plan 2006
    Stoughton Affordable Housing Plan 2006 Town of Stoughton . 10 Pearl Street . Stoughton MA, 02072 1 Background The Town of Stoughton is a former mill town with 27,000 residents that has experienced slow population growth over the past ten years. The majority of the existing housing stock was built prior to 1970, and most housing in town is owner occupied. While only 63% of the housing stock is single family units, almost all new construction is single family housing. Stoughton has modest potential for residential growth, but substantial potential for commercial and industrial growth, based upon the MAPC buildout analysis of the Town. Stoughton has a history of manufacturing and an emerging cluster of regional retail, as well as a substantial base of land zoned for commercial and industrial purposes. The major commercial and industrial areas in town are located adjacent to Route 24 and along routes 138, 139 and 27, but smaller areas are interspersed with residential zones due to the community’s industrial past. The Town has significant protected open space resources, including the Bird Street Sanctuary, water department lands, recreational fields and a municipal golf course. Additional privately owned, but not protected, undeveloped lands are an important factor in the character of the community. Stoughton has good access to the regional roadway network, being served by several state routes and 3 interchanges on Route 24. Stoughton also has access to regional transit, being served by bus from Brockton and MBTA Commuter rail at the station in downtown Stoughton. Stoughton is one of the region’s most affordable, accessible towns, but future housing is likely to be less diverse, less affordable, and farther from transit.
    [Show full text]
  • A. Single-Room Occupancy Residential Housing
    COUNTY OF PLACER Commun PLANNING Michael J. Johnson, AICP SERVICES DIVISION Agency Director Paul Thompson, Deputy Director MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Board of Supervi FROM: Michael J. Johnson, AICP I'C:'- • Agency Director DATE: June 4, 2013 SUBJECT: SINGLE-ROOM OCCUPAN RESIDENTIAL HOUSING - HOUSING ELEMENT IMPLEMENTATION ACTION REQUESTED 1. Conduct a public hearing to consider the proposed amendments to County Code Chapter 17 pertaining to Single-Room Occupancy Residential Housing and associated amendments to County Code Chapter 15, Article 15.04, 2. Adopt the Revised Negative Declaration prepared for the Single-Room Occupancy Zoning Text and Building and Construction Codes Amendments, and 3. Adopt an Ordinance amending Placer County Code Chapter 17 (Zoning Ordinance), Articles 17.04, 17.06, 17.20, 17.22, 17.26, 17.30, 17.34, 17.48, and 17.56 pertaining to Single-Room Occupancy Housing in order to implement State housing law and the County's Housing Element, and 4. Adopt an Ordinance amending Placer County Code Chapter 15 (Building and Construction Codes), Article 15.04, to add Section 15.04.127 pertaining to local revisions to the standards for Efficiency Dwelling Units in order to implement State housing law and the County's Housing Element. There is no net County cost associated with these actions. BACKGROUND The proposed Zoning Text Amendment is intended to implement State Housing Law for Single-Room Occupancy (SRO) housing and the County's Housing Element Program G-4. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance would add definitions for SRO housing. SRO complexes with 30 or fewer units would be allowed by zoning clearance (I.E., by right) in the HS (Highway Service) and RES (Resort) zoning districts, and with a Minor Use Permit in those same districts for complexes with over 30 units.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Progress Report
    Dublin, GA VA Medical Center, Building 1 Department of Veterans Affairs Executive Order 13287 – Preserve America Section 3 Triennial Report September 2020 1 INTRODUCTION The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is reporting its progress on identifying, protecting, and using historic properties to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) and Secretary of the Interior (SOI) for the period 10/1/2017 to 9/30/2020, pursuant to Section 3 of Executive Order (EO) 13287 – Preserve America. VA’s mission is to fulfill President Lincoln’s promise in his second inaugural address, “to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow, and his orphan,” by serving and honoring the men and women who are America’s Veterans. Much of this work occurs in the rich historic fabric built by our nation to care for its heroes. VA consists of three administrations: the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA), and the National Cemetery Administration (NCA); and staff offices, including the Office of Construction and Facilities Management (CFM), which is responsible for preservation policy and oversight across VA. This 2020 report addresses VA’s preservation activities related to VHA and NCA real property; VBA is not currently responsible for any historic properties. The main section provides answers to the 10 specific questions posed by the ACHP for this reporting cycle. Appendices A-D address the broad topics of identification, protection, and use of historic properties, concluding with preservation successes, challenges, and opportunities for VA. Appendix E includes project photographs. 2 EO 13287 PRESERVE AMERICA SECTION 3: ACHP 2020 QUESTIONS AND VA ANSWERS Identifying Historic Properties 1.
    [Show full text]
  • House-To-Sro Conversion
    HOUSE-TO-SRO CONVERSION Eugene has a shortage of Single-Room Occupancy (SRO) housing. One way to quickly create more is to convert conventional housing into SRO facilities. A SRO is a cross between a group home and a conventional rooming house that can be tailored to meet the needs of a managing organization and selected tenants. Houses might serve specific populations, such as veterans, refugees, or people living with mental illness, people who are medically fragile or people recovering from addiction. Supervision can range from a daily or monthly staff visit to installing a full-time resident manager. SROs are ideal for individuals who use Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (VASH) or Section 8 vouchers, which do not cover conventional “roommate” situations. In a SRO tenants rent individual rooms and have access to shared bathrooms, kitchens, and other living spaces. SROs are generally more affordable, and they have the added benefit of allowing clients to build up good rental histories, so that they can more easily rent apartments in the future. What’s required for a SRO conversion? Are there zoning restrictions? To meet Section 8 / Housing and Urban Development Residential zones (R-1–R-4) have different restrictions (HUD) requirements1, most conversions require: on the number of bedrooms and other factors. So to 1. At least 110 square feet of floor space, and at least determine the zoning of a particular property you can 4 square feet of closet space with an unobstructed visit our website at www.eugene-or.gov/zoningmap. height of at least five feet, for each SRO unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding SRO January 2001
    Understanding SRO January 2001 The Single Room Occupancy (SRO) program is authorized by Section 441 of the McKinney- Vento Homeless Assistance Act. Under the program, HUD enters into Annual Contributions Contracts with public housing agencies (PHAs) in connection with the moderate rehabilitation of residential properties that, when rehabilitation is completed, will contain multiple single room dwelling units. The PHAs make Section 8 rental assistance payments to participating owners (i.e., landlords) on behalf of homeless individuals who rent the rehabilitated dwellings. The rental assistance payments cover the difference between a portion of the tenant's income (normally 30%) and the unit's rent, which must be within the fair market rent (FMR) established by HUD. Rental assistance for SRO units is provided for a period of 10 years. Owners are compensated for the cost of some of the rehabilitation (as well as the other costs of owning and maintaining the property) through the rental assistance payments. To be eligible for assistance, a unit must receive a minimum of $3,000 of rehabilitation, including its prorated share of work to be accomplished on common areas or systems, to meet housing quality standards (HQS). Assistance provided under the SRO program is designed to bring more standard SRO units into the local housing supply and to use those units to assist homeless persons. The SRO units might be in a rundown hotel, a Y, an old school, or even in a large abandoned home. SRO Terms Forms of Assistance Terms of the Assistance Eligible Participants Eligible Structures Rehab Costs Housing Quality Standards Resident Occupancy Requirements Determining the SRO Rental Payment Application Process SRO Project Development Annual and Special Adjustments 1 SRO Terms This section is intended as a general overview of key SRO terms.
    [Show full text]